Next Article in Journal
Simultaneous Sequestration of Co2+ and Mn2+ by Fungal Manganese Oxide through Asbolane Formation
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Co-Reduction Conditions of Nickel Laterite Ore and Red Mud on Ferronickel Particle Size Characteristics and Grindability of Carbothermic Reduction Products
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Meteoric 10Be, 137Cs and 239+240Pu as Tracers of Long- and Medium-Term Soil Erosion—A Review

1
Institute of Soil Science, Plant Nutrition and Environmental Protection, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzka 53, 50-357 Wroclaw, Poland
2
Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Lwowska 1, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
3
Department of Geography, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2022, 12(3), 359; https://doi.org/10.3390/min12030359
Submission received: 20 February 2022 / Revised: 11 March 2022 / Accepted: 11 March 2022 / Published: 15 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)

Abstract

:
Isotopes of meteoric 10Be, 137Cs, 239+240Pu have been proposed as a soil redistribution tracer and applied worldwide as an alternative method to classical field-related techniques (e.g., sediment traps). Meteoric 10Be provides information about long-term soil redistribution rates (millennia), while 137Cs and 239+240Pu give medium-term rates (decades). A significant progress in developing new models and approaches for the calculation of erosion rates has been made; thus, we provide a global review (n = 59) of research articles to present these three isotopes (meteoric 10Be, 239+240Pu and 137Cs) as soil erosion markers in different environments and under different land-use types. Understanding the dynamics and behaviours of isotopes in the soil environment is crucial to determine their usefulness as soil erosion tracers; thus, we discuss the chemical–physical behaviour of meteoric 10Be, 137Cs and 239+240Pu in soils. The application of these isotopes sometimes has strong limitations, and we give suggestions on how to overcome them or how to adapt them to a given situation. This review also shows where these isotopic methods can potentially be applied in the future. A lack in knowledge about soil redistribution rates exists particularly in loess-dominated areas where the tillage system has changed or in areas with strong wind erosion.

1. Introduction

The geochemical composition of soils reflects the chemical weathering of the parent material, atmospheric deposition, dust input and biological processes [1,2]. As a result, certain elements accumulate and are preserved over time in soils in stable landforms, such as plains and low-inclination slopes [2]. However, on slopes that experience mass wasting processes, including physical mixing, erosion and downslope sediment transport, the primary distribution of elements in the soil profile is disrupted, potentially resulting in selective elemental loss or accumulation over time [2,3].
Isotopes of beryllium (meteoric 10Be), plutonium (239+240Pu) and caesium (137Cs) are widely used in Earth sciences to reconstruct, for example, Earth’s palaeomagnetic field [4,5,6], snow palaeoaccumulation rates [7], seafloor sedimentation rates [8] and denudation rates [9] and to determine the age of fluvial terraces [10,11,12], evaluate seawater exchange cycles [13] and long-distance Asian dust transport [14], among several other processes. More recently, these isotopic tools have been used to investigate soil erosion processes in various environments, such as grasslands and forests of the European Alps or the Rocky Mountains [15,16,17,18,19,20,21], in arable lands, forests and grasslands of tropical and subtropical areas and the wet–dry tropics [22,23,24,25,26], in forested mountainous regions [21,27], forests and arable lands under continental Mediterranean climates [28,29,30,31], in moraine landscapes used as farmlands and forests [2,32,33,34,35], in loess regions that are dominated by agriculture [36,37,38,39,40] or in post-fire forests and deserts areas [41,42].
The isotopes 10Be, 239+240Pu and 137Cs allow the tracing of sediment transport and erosion and deposition processes. Thus, they are essential for understanding the evolution of hillslopes and landscapes [2,43,44,45,46,47]. However, although they have a wide range of applications in environmental research, a comprehensive overview of meteoric 10Be, 239+240Pu and 137Cs, as soil erosion tracers, is lacking, which would facilitate identifying the most appropriate tools to study soil processes. Thus, the main aims of this review were: (1) to characterise 10Be, 239+240Pu and 137Cs as soil redistribution tracers and their chemical and physical behaviours in the soil environment; (2) to compile published worldwide articles from various environments with different types of land use where these isotopes were applied; (3) to compare erosion rates determined with isotopes with values obtained from the generally used RUSLE approach and (4) to show potential future applications.

2. Chemical Mechanisms and Behaviour Isotopes of 10Be, 239+240Pu and 137Cs

Understanding the dynamics and behaviours of isotopes in the soil environment is crucial to determining their usefulness as soil erosion tracers [48,49]. Therefore, in this section, we present the origin of meteoric 10Be, 137Cs and 239+240Pu and their chemistry and distribution in soils.

2.1. Formation of Meteoric 10Be

Meteoric 10Be is a cosmogenic radionuclide, produced constantly in the upper atmosphere and at the Earth’s surface as a result of the spallation of 14N and 16O by high-energy cosmic rays to form 10BeO or 10Be(OH)2 [50,51,52] (Figure 1 and Table 1). 10Be formed in the atmosphere is adsorbed onto aerosols and is primarily delivered to the Earth’s surface by wet and dry deposition [48,52,53]. The fluxes of 10Be mainly depend on the precipitation rates and/or latitude [54,55]. At high latitudes, the precipitation rates are very low, which limit the meteoric 10Be flux, whereas, at mid-latitudes, the precipitation tends to be higher; thus, 10Be deposition is also higher [53,54]. Dry deposition is less important, because it represents <10% of the total 10Be flux, except in areas with very low precipitation rates, such as deserts or the inner part of Antarctica [52,53,54,56].

2.2. Meteoric 10Be in Soils

After deposition, meteoric 10Be is steadily adsorbed on clay and fine-particle surfaces having a diameter 0–2 μm (Figure 2 and Figure 3) [37,52,57,58]. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient based on data from various environments (n = 59) also confirms the strong correlation between 10Be and the clay fraction (Figure 3). The magnitude of the adsorbed amount of beryllium is ultimately driven by the sorption capacity system [58]. The adsorption potential and, thus, the fixation of meteoric 10Be in soils depends on pH, soil texture, organic matter, the oxyhydroxide content and its cation exchange capacity [2,48,59,60]. An increase in pH caused a net increase in the negative surface charge and related enhanced affinity for metal ions; thus, the cation exchange capacity also increased [61]. At a soil pH over 4, and in the absence of organic acids, 10Be mostly occurs as hydrolysed species: BeOH+, Be(OH)2 and Be(OH)3 (Figure 4) that are reactive and, thus, are readily adsorbed onto clay minerals.
Accumulation of meteoric 10Be begins in the upper part of soil (because it reaches the surface with rainwater), from where it penetrates to greater depths until the whole soil column is saturated [53]. Willenbring and von Blackenburg [52], however, stated that concentrations of 9Be and 10Be in soils are too low to saturate the adsorption site; thus, a rather partial release of 10Be occurs when pH < 4 and Be2+ competes with dissolved Al3+ for the exchange sites. In such acidic soils, 10Be may be translocated to a greater soil or saprolite depth or lost through leaching [25]. Nevertheless, meteoric 10Be still can be used for soil denudation research in acidic environments when its loss can be estimated [25,62]. Although some of the factors that influence the behaviour of meteoric 10Be are described above, some of the mechanisms still need a better explanation.

2.3. Origin of Anthropogenic Radionuclides—137Cs and 239+240Pu

Fallout radionuclides (FRNs), such as 137Cs and 239+240Pu, are also called anthropogenic radionuclides. They have been distributed across the globe by nuclear weapons fabrication and testing, nuclear power plant accidents and nuclear fuel reprocessing (Figure 1 and Table 1) [17]. The Southern Hemisphere is characterised by a lower total fallout of radionuclides than the Northern Hemisphere, because more atmospheric nuclear testing occurred in the latter one [65]. 137Cs is characterised by a short half-life of 30.17 y. About 70% of its global fallout has already disappeared through radioactive decay [66]. The plutonium isotopes, however, have a much longer half-life, namely 24,110 y for 239Pu and 6561 y for 240Pu. Therefore, they are becoming more popular as a replacement for 137Cs [66].

2.4. Anthropogenic Nuclides in Soils

In soils, plutonium exists in four oxidation states: Pu(III), Pu(IV), Pu(V) and Pu(VI) [49,67]. 239+240Pu sorption depends on pH and redox conditions. In strongly acidic or anoxic soil conditions, organic compounds reduce Pu(VI) and Pu(V) to immobile Pu(III), which often occurs as an organic complex [49,67,68,69]. Therefore, 239+240Pu has a high affinity towards organic matter. Additionally, 239+240Pu is strongly bound to clay particles, which retain it in the soil [49,70,71,72]. Our data compilation from 25 soil profiles (Figure 3 and Table S1) showed a strongly positive correlation between 239+240Pu and organic carbon; however, a strong association with clay was not obvious. 239+240Pu is a relatively “new” soil erosion tracer. Thus, its sorption–desorption mechanisms in soil are not yet fully understood.
137Cs shows a strong affinity towards clay minerals, whereas its affinity towards organic matter is rather low [71,73,74,75]. Based on data from various environments (n = 38 soil profiles), a significant positive correlation between the 137Cs activity and clay content was found (Figure 3). Additionally, a positive correlation between the 137Cs activity and organic carbon (n = 28) was calculated, but it might be caused by the relatively high SOC content in the samples considered. In general, 137Cs components are readily soluble in water, although strong adsorption by the clay fraction in soils is highly likely [76]. Thus, the sorption of 137Cs in the soil system mainly depends on the clay content but also on the pH or the redox conditions. In acidic environments, Cs+ competes with H+ for selective sorption sites, and due to the stronger dissolution of clay minerals in such environments, the sorption of 137Cs is lower, whilst under redox conditions, Cs+ competes with NH4+ [74,77,78]. The binding of 137Cs increases with the increasing pH (Figure 5), because under such conditions, a greater electrostatic attraction of the cation surface occurs; thus, more Cs+ is sorbed onto the negatively charged clay minerals [74]. When the soil organic content is higher than 5%, it starts to outmatch the fixation of Cs+ on clay minerals and becomes available for plant uptake or leaching into deeper soil layers [79,80]. Thus, in peaty or podzolic soils, 137Cs is considerably more mobile than in other soils [81,82].

2.5. Profile Depth Distribution of Meteoric 10Be, 137Cs and 239+240Pu

10Be is a useful geochronometer and long-term erosion tracer due to its long half-life (1.387 ± 0.012 Myr), worldwide occurrence and strong binding by fine soil particles [2,33,86]. Adsorbed meteoric 10Be can be moved along the soil profile because of fine particles translocation via soil water and physical mixing and the percolation of water that may desorb 10Be and transporting it [2]. In general, the highest content of meteoric 10Be is measured in horizons having the highest clay contents (Figure 2) [2,10,11,27,37,52,57]. Thus, the distribution of 10Be within a soil profile in nonacidic conditions as a declining, humped or uniform trend reflects soil evolutionary processes, the degree of surface erosion and soil mass movements [2,18,48,52]. Undisturbed soil profiles are characterised by a declining 10Be content, with the highest value occurring in the topmost horizons (Figure 6(A1,B1)). Soils on actively eroding hillslopes are also characterised by declining 10Be contents [48]. However, their highest content is up to one order of magnitude lower compared to noneroded soils (Figure 6(A3,B3)) [48,87]. The highest 10Be content in subsurface horizons (Figure 6(A2,B2)) is typically found in soils where clay illuviation or intense podzolisation has occurred [11,15,37,57]. Soils that have undergone deep mixing by physical and paedogenic processes or colluvial soils where eroded material from the upper parts of a slope has been deposited (Figure 6 (A4,B4)) are, however, characterised by a uniform 10Be content [38,48,88]. In cases where the topsoil has a different origin (e.g., due to the addition of aeolian silt) to the underlying horizons, significantly lower 10Be concentrations occur in the upper part of the soil profile in contrast to the deeper horizons (Figure 6(A5,B5)) [27].
Additionally, the FRNs from global fallout are strongly adsorbed onto the fine earth fraction in the topsoil [65,89], and their distribution occurs as a result of soil particle movements [65]. Consequently, the profile depth distributions of 137Cs and 239+240Pu (Figure 6) are similar to meteoric 10Be and provide information about soil erosion and accumulation, since they were introduced into the environment [49,90].

3. Calculation of Soil Erosion Rates Using Meteoric 10Be

Most erosion calculations are based on the approaches defined by Lal [91], Egli et al. [15] and Zollinger et al. [19]. However, recently, a few advanced models were proposed to study the distribution of meteoric 10Be. One of them is the soil–hillslope model (Be2D) that simulates vertical and lateral redistribution of soil and 10Be along a hillslope and enables insight into processes that influence its transport [92]. The Be2D model considers soil formation, clay translocation, bioturbation and the chemical mobility of 10Be [92]. Additionally, this model considers soil creep, tillage and water erosion reflecting lateral transport and is fully described in Campforts et al. [92].
Another one is the relatively new LODO (Loss Only, Diffusion Only) model presented by Jeliński et al. [32]. This model simulates 10Be concentration profiles in soils over time. It considers vertical diffusion and the net soil flux. In the LODO model, the downward migration of 10Be from the topsoil is modelled as a diffusive process with the depth dependent on diffusivity. It considers that, prior to diffusion, all 10Be enter the surficial depth increment equally [32].

4. Reference Sites and Conversion Models for Anthropogenic Radionuclides

4.1. The Importance of Reference Sites

FRN techniques are used to calculate soil erosion or accumulation rates by comparing the total radionuclide inventory per unit area of a reference site with the FRN activity of a study site or by comparing the temporal evolution of the FRN stocks over time (i.e., by revisiting the sites) [49,93]. When the inventory of the study site is lower than that of reference site, this indicates erosion, whereas a higher stock indicates the deposition of soil material [49]. Thus, the choice of reference site plays a crucial role, because inaccurate values ascribed to the reference inventory will lead to underestimation or overestimation of erosion rates [93]. The undisturbed reference site where soil denudation is absent or negligible should be located, e.g., on a flat, well-vegetated, unploughed site [49]. According to Sutherland [94], the isotope content at a reference site can be used to calculate soil erosion if the variance coefficient is <30%. Recently, especially in the case of 239+240Pu, attention is paid to measure from five up to ten replicate cores per study site or to take a large amount of sample material (around 1–2 kg per sample) and homogenised them to overcome the large sampling number and measurements.

4.2. Soil Redistribution Rates

One usually assumes that the source of isotopes is just one, and if not, the percentage deposition from each source has to be known to use the calculation models properly [20,49,95]. This is especially the case with 137Cs (see Section 4.3). Therefore, the separation of global and Chernobyl fallout may be done by estimating the initial inventory of 137Cs related to atmospheric nuclear weapon tests. This estimation is based on the approach of Sarmiento and Gwinn [96] and precipitation data [95].
For the estimation of soil erosion and/or deposition rates using 137Cs and 239+240Pu, various models like the Proportional Model (PM), Mass Balance Model (MBM), Profile Distribution Model (PDM) and Diffusion and Migration model (DDM) were widely applied [97,98,99,100,101,102,103]. Furthermore, a two-dimensional spatial integration of the MBM for 137Cs was developed [104]. Van Oost et al. [104] described the crucial processes for 137Cs redistribution that may be independently simulated in this complex approach. Soil mixing and tillage redistribution are modelled by the combination of the spatial distribution of 137Cs with a displacement distribution, and water erosion is simulated using topographic equations [104]. Additionally, an approach exists that combines the MBM with models estimating the spatial soil redistribution, like WATEM/SEDEM (Water and Tillage Erosion Model/Sediment Delivery Model). Such a combination enables calibrating the parameters of spatial models and a detailed determination of the soil redistribution [31].
In 2016, a new algorithm was proposed—modelling deposition and erosion rates using radio nuclides (MODERN) [49,89]. MODERN is a new concept characterised by several noticeable advantages; it more accurately describes the measured FRN inventory in a soil profile. It does not make any distinct assumptions for the reference site and allows the conversion of isotope inventories into soil gain/loss rates, independent of the type of land use [49].

4.3. Radionuclide Ratios

The main assumption of using atmospheric isotopes is that their spatial distributions should be homogeneous [20,95]. However, in Western and Central Europe, the deposition of 137Cs was rather heterogeneous [49]. Most of the fallout 137Cs originates from the 1986 Chernobyl incident and not nuclear weapons tests. Additionally, on the East Coast of Honshu Island (Japan), the spatial distribution of 137Cs fallout is heterogenous due to the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) accident in 2011 [66]. Thus, the proportion of 137Cs Chernobyl or FDNPP fallout at reference sites should be known [20]. 239+240Pu is not present in the volatile fraction of fuel debris from nuclear reactor accidents. Therefore, the Chernobyl 239+240Pu fallout is more limited to Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Poland and the Baltic countries [105,106], and the FDNPP 239+240Pu fallout is mainly centred around Fukushima Prefecture [107]. Other countries, however, have a homogeneous deposition of 239+240Pu that originated mainly from the atmospheric nuclear weapons tests conducted in the 1950s and 1960s [17,20]. Therefore, to determine the origin of radionuclides, their ratios are used, because the values of the ratio vary significantly depending on the source [66]. In the Northern Hemisphere, the ratio of 240Pu/239Pu for global fallout ranges from 0.14 to 0.24, with an average of 0.18; for the Chernobyl fallout, the ratios are between 0.37 and 0.41, and for FDNPP, the range is between 0.30 and 0.33 [66,108,109].

5. Application in Different Environments in Agricultural and Natural Landscapes

The use of isotopes for the study of soil erosion began in the late 1950s [110]. Since then, 10Be, 137Cs and 239+240Pu isotopes have been used for the estimation of erosion rates at the temporal and spatial scale. However, the rates can drastically differ as a response to land-use changes and modifications in land management. Thus, in this section, we briefly discuss the use of isotopes in different environments (Figure 7 and Figure 8 and Table 2). Erosion rates determined with isotopes are compared with values from RUSLE. Potential problems in their application and how to avoid methodological problems are addressed (Table 3). Additionally, Mabit et al. [111] pointed out that FRNs should be used for studying soil redistribution within watersheds, the conversion models used should be improved and a conjunctive use of isotopes that cover different timescales provide more information about a study site. Below, we present whether these points are met in the current studies by analysing 83 soils from alpine sites, 35 from loess deposits, 28 from moraine landscapes, 35 from coral reef terraces and Mediterranean areas and 17 soils from the tropics (Figure 7).

5.1. Alpine Sites

Although, there are certain limitations in the application of the discussed isotopes at Alpine sites, they have been widely used to determine soil redistribution rates [15,16,17,18,19,27,92,129,130,144,145]. For example, Alewell et al. [17] employed 239+240Pu and 137Cs as tools in measuring soil erosion in mountainous grasslands in the Swiss Alps. At such sites, the distribution of 137Cs was chiefly due to the fallout from the Chernobyl accident. This incident occurred at a time when the mountains were still snow-covered. Following snowmelt, the spatial distribution of 137Cs became very patchy, because part of it was lost due to the overland surface flow, whereas, at sites that had been snow-free, the 137Cs remained and accumulated in the soil. The spatial distribution of 239+240Pu, however, was not affected by the nuclear accident. Therefore, the erosion rates were determined using 239+240Pu (Table 2). The application of 137Cs at such Chernobyl-affected sites is, however, still possible. To overcome this limitation, Meusburger et al. [20] determined the 239+240Pu/137Cs activity ratios at the reference sites. The calculation of this ratio provided information about the relative influence of the global versus Chernobyl deposition and allowed the consideration of two 137Cs sources by a using conversion model. The values of the 239+240Pu/137Cs activity ratios increased with the soil depth, indicating the predominant origin of the 137Cs in the topsoil being Chernobyl, while the deeper layers were characterised by a higher proportion of the 137Cs from global fallout. Therefore, the average Chernobyl contribution was estimated to be 75%, which was used to convert the 137Cs inventories (Table 2), and the obtained results were in the range of those determined with RUSLE [131] (Table 2).
The soil erosion rates using 137Cs and 239+240Pu were also determined in the Lake Soyang catchment, which has a total area of 65 km2 [89]. The rates agree well with data from RUSLE [141]. The calculation model is crucial for the interpretation of long-term erosion rates based on meteoric 10Be at Alpine sites. As discussed by Zollinger et al. [19] and Egli et al. [15], an approach using steady-state conditions gives unreliable results and does not detect deposition processes. In addition, the interpretation of meteoric 10Be data becomes difficult in soils developed from heterogenous parent materials. This problem was addressed by Waroszewski et al. [27], where a thin aeolian silt drape overlayed periglacial mica schist deposits; thus, two calculations were used and compared to estimate the erosion rates in mountainous forests. The first based on the assumption that the uppermost horizon had the same origin as the underlying layers, and the second did not consider the uppermost horizon due to its different origin. Version 1 overestimated the erosion rates, while version 2 produced erosion values (Table 2) that seemed more plausible for this mountainous region. The better suitability of the second version was also supported by RUSLE data (Table 2).
Recently, using a combination of isotopes that cover different intervals of time (e.g., 239+240Pu and 10Be) has been applied. This can help in deciphering processes over different timescales. It may shed light onto changes of soil redistribution caused by evolving environmental settings or anthropogenic forcing and allow for the comparison of different time ranges. For instance, Zollinger et al. [19] showed that the short- to mid-term soil redistribution rates in the alpine tundra are dramatically higher than the long-term rates (covering a period of ~15 kyr). This has been mainly caused by climate warming and melting of the permafrost, which has distinctly increased soil redistribution over the last few decades.

5.2. Loess Deposits

Loess deposits are very susceptible to erosion processes [124,139,146,147,148,149]. Thus, isotopic techniques were widely applied in such landscapes [36,38,39,95,104,121,126,150]. Poręba et al. [38,95] applied 137Cs measurements to a loess colluvium to interpret soil erosion in a Polish loess area under agriculture use (arable lands). In this case, about 45–90% of 137Cs derived from the Chernobyl accident. When taking this into account, the erosion rates were in a typical range for loess environments, as shown by RUSLE (Table 2). Other results showed, by using 239+240Pu, that the soil erosion rates of loess landscapes of Southwestern Poland are often much higher than tolerable rates but still in the range of values from RUSLE [40]. For the Chinese Loess Plateau, Zhang et al. [39] showed that soil erosion determined using 137Cs is considerably lower than the modelled rates using the RUSLE model or sediment yields. This issue was explained by the simulation errors and the effect of the topography. Additionally, in arable areas of the Chinese Loess Plateau, 137Cs was involved to determine wind erosion by subtracting the water erosion from the total erosion calculated using 137Cs [36,123,151]. However, such an approach can cause some uncertainty. The RUSLE model, which is used to calculate water erosion, may underestimate or overestimate erosion rates [36,151]. Thus, the issue of determining wind erosion with isotopes definitely requires more research. In loess landscapes, the methodological combination of soil redistribution rates based on 137Cs measurements with spatial soil erosion models was applied in forests and arable lands [104,126]. Recently, 239+240Pu and 137Cs were used for the assessment of rehabilitation effectiveness at sites that were used in the past for agriculture and now are afforested or are grasslands [121,124,127,134]. Examples showing the effect of changes in a tillage system on erosion rates in loess landscapes are still scarce.

5.3. Moraine Landscapes

In moraine landscapes, radioisotopes may help to decipher the evolution of soil erosion rates with soil development. Portes et al. [21], by using 239+240Pu, showed that soil erosion rates in forests and the tundra on moraine hillslopes have strongly decreased over time. Both applied models—the profile distribution model [98,100] and the inventory model [22]—detected the same trend. The application of 239+240Pu in forests of such landscapes may provide information if the erosion in a studied area is recent or ancient, as presented by Calitri et al. [34]. The combination of 239+240Pu (last few decades) and meteoric 10Be (integration over millennia) in arable lands often confirms that the intensification of agriculture in recent decades has strongly influenced soil redistribution rates [33]. Moreover, recent investigations of Jelinski et al. [32] exhibited that natural and anthropogenic soil redistribution rates can be discerned when meteoric 10Be is combined with the LODO, Be2D and WaTEM models.
Some investigations, however, did not focus on the calculation of soil erosion and considered only isotope inventories [2,35]. Ouimet et al. [35] presented the spatial and temporal variations of meteoric 10Be inventories in moraines and fluvial terraces, which allowed to identify specific slope processes. Soil erosion seemed to have occurred even at the older sites (>90 ka), whereas the younger sites (15–21 ka) exhibited higher 10Be inventories, indicating the dynamic aspects of 10Be deposition, like snow drift that caused spatial variations in measured inventories at individual sites.

5.4. Coastal and Coral Reef Terraces and Mediterranean Soils

Isotopes were also applied in soils on coral reef, coastal and fluvial terraces [11,12,35,60,113,120] and Mediterranean landscapes [29,30,31,118]. Maejima et al. [11] and Tsai et al. [12] applied (meteoric) 10Be to the soils of uplifted coral reef terraces in Southwestern Japan and in fluvial terraces in Taiwan, respectively. These cases showed the importance of the calculation model for the determination of soil erosion rates. In both publications, the mathematical model of Lal [91] was used. Therefore, processes such as eluviation/illuviation or vertical mixing were not considered in the model, which resulted in an overestimation of the soil erosion rates.
Radioisotopes are suitable tracers of soil erosion rates in such environments [35,60]. For instance, Meliho et al. [30] applied 137Cs to determine the erosion on terraces with different land uses (forestry and agriculture) in the High Atlas (Ourika watershed) of Morocco, whereas Mabit et al. [29] and Quijano et al. [31] applied radioisotopes to study soil erosion alone or in combination with spatial models in Mediterranean landscapes. The obtained results were reliable, because they lie in the range of data provided by RUSLE (Table 2; Panagos et al. [133,138]).

5.5. Tropics

Radioisotopes have been widely used in the tropics [22,23,79,127,128] and comparable with results from USLE model [132,136]. Lal et al. [23] applied 239+240Pu to analyse soil losses and gains in the wet–dry tropics of Northern Australia on three major land-use types (grazing fields, mahogany and peanut plantation). Wilken et al. [26] demonstrated that pristine forests show no indication of soil redistribution based on 239+240Pu along topographical gradients. They, however, have measured tremendously high soil erosion and sedimentation rates up 87 t ha−1 y−1 during the last 55 years. Hoo et al. [128] also used 239Pu to determine the recent soil erosion rates at the scale of a Canberra water supply catchment of a few hundred km2 in a fire-ravaged area. Here, erosion and water quality are tightly interconnected. Fifield et al. [127] combined meteoric 10Be and 137Cs to compare the long- and medium-term soil erosion and production rates. The authors showed that modern soil loss is considerably higher than soil production. 137Cs also traced erosion processes on hillslopes in Haiti, where tillage is performed with traditional manual tools. Thus, cultivated sites did not exhibit any evidence of significant tillage mixing, and it was not possible to apply a standard conversion model for cultivated soils. Consequently, a conversion model developed for undisturbed sites had to be used to calculate the soil erosion rates, which seemingly provided reliable results [24].

5.6. Acidic Soils

Under acidic conditions, the discussed isotopes may occur in mobile forms, and they may be transported to the saprolite and/or lost through leaching [52,59,62,74,152]. To overcome this limitation for meteoric 10Be, Bacon et al. [62] proposed to use the stable isotope 9Be that is mobilised from the parent material through weathering to determine the potential loss of meteoric 10Be [25]. This approach is based on the chemical mass losses of 9Be in a regolith profile being used to constrain the chemical depletion of 10Be. Adding chemical losses of 9Be to the measured 9Be inventory and assuming that 9Be and meteoric 10Be behave similarly in the regolith, the reactive 9Be fractions are positively related to the 10Be concentrations. Therefore, the ratio between the corrected and measured 9Be concentrations enables a correction of the 10Be concentrations, so that erosion rates can be calculated. Additionally, in acidic environments such as forests, the Be2D model, which considers meteoric 10Be translocation within a soil profile, was applied, and the results seemed reasonable [92].

6. Conclusions and Outlook

Meteoric 10Be, 137Cs and 239+240Pu are useful tracers of soil redistribution. They have been applied in different environments, such as moraines, loess landscapes, alpine sites, coastal and coral reef terraces, Mediterranean soils, tropics, acidic soils and forest soils and used as forests, grasslands and arable lands. The results determined with isotopes were in a good agreement with the values from RUSLE, which proves their usefulness as soil erosion tracers. Meteoric 10Be allows the calculation of long-term redistribution rates (often since the start of soil formation), while 137Cs and 239+240Pu give possibility to calculating the medium-term (decades) rates. The application of 137Cs, however, has increasing limitations caused by its short half-life and its heterogeneous distribution in European soils owing to the Chernobyl nuclear accident. Thus, 239+240Pu has been suggested as a promising alternative. Its high precision and increasing application have indicated its success.
When using these isotopes, a crucial issue is selecting the most suitable conversion model for calculating the soil redistribution rates. For meteoric 10Be, the most popular models are those proposed by Lal [91] and Egli et al. [15]; however, the latter appears to work better, because it assumes that soils are an open system. New models such as LODO with Be2D provide insights into the natural and anthropogenic soil redistribution rates. For 137Cs and 239+240Pu, the mass balance, diffusion and migration, profile distribution models and inventory method are often used, whereas MODERN is a recently developed model that stimulates the stock and the FRN profile distribution.
When using 239+240Pu and 137Cs, the choice of a reference profile is crucial, as the results of sites exhibiting soil redistribution are referenced. Choosing an unrepresentative (disturbed and eroded) reference profile will lead to under- or overestimation of these rates.
Many examples have proved the usefulness of these isotopes in estimating the soil redistribution rates. There are, however, also several limitations with these isotopic methods, although solutions exist for some of them. For example, the distribution of 137Cs may not be homogeneous. In such cases, 239+240Pu may be helpful in correcting any bias. Likewise, in deeply weathered and acidic soils, losses of the inventory of 10Be may be corrected by using 9Be.
Moreover, the simultaneous application of 10Be and 137Cs and/or 239+240Pu enables tracing back changes in the soil erosion rates over time. It has been shown that global warming has accelerated the soil redistribution rates in Alpine regions and on agriculture land. Using a combination of several isotopes at the same study sites enables cross-checking whether the obtained results are comparable and, therefore, reliable. This kind of approach was presented by Mabit et al. [111] as a challenge and necessity in the use of isotopes.
Isotopic tools are still underexplored in soils, but they could be increasingly applied under different agroecological conditions, with soil redistribution rates being quantified over decades to millennia. Still, several gaps in the knowledge about soil redistribution exists, e.g., in loess areas under different tillage systems or applying isotopes in larger scales like watersheds. The determination of wind erosion and the application of new calculation models are additional challenges.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/min12030359/s1. Table S1: Data for Spearmann’s correlation calculation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, A.L., J.W., M.E. and M.S.; investigation, A.L., M.E. and M.S.; supervision, J.W., M.E. and C.K.; data visualisation, A.L. and M.S.; writing—initial draft, A.L. and writing—reviewing and editing, A.L., J.W., M.E. and C.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Center (Poland), project number 2018/29/B/ST10/01282 (Opus 15).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Krzysztof Papuga, Czesław Adamiak and Barbara Szyda for their help in the statistical analysis. The APC is financed by Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dethier, D.P.; Birkeland, P.W.; McCarthy, J.A. Using the accumulation of CBD-extractable iron and clay content to estimate soil age on stable surfaces and nearby slopes, Front Range, Colorado. Geomorphology 2012, 173–174, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wyshnytzky, C.E.; Ouimet, W.B.; McCarthy, J.; Dethier, D.P.; Shroba, R.R.; Bierman, P.R.; Rood, D.H. Meteoric 10Be, clay, and extractable iron depth profiles in the Colorado Front Range: Implications for understanding soil mixing and erosion. Catena 2015, 127, 32–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dixon, J.L.; von Blanckenburg, F. Soils as pacemakers and limiters of global silicate weathering. C. R. Geosci. 2012, 344, 597–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Frank, M.; Schwarz, B.; Baumann, S.; Kubik, P.W.; Suter, M.; Mangini, A. A 200 kyr record of cosmogenic radionuclide production rate and geomagnetic field intensity from 10Be in globally stacked deep-sea sediments1. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1997, 149, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Simon, Q.; Suganuma, Y.; Okada, M.; Haneda, Y. High-resolution 10Be and paleomagnetic recording of the last polarity reversal in the Chiba composite section: Age and dynamics of the Matuyama–Brunhes transition. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2019, 519, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wagner, G.; Beer, J.; Masarik, J.; Muscheler, R.; Kubik, P.W.; Mende, W.; Laj, C.; Raisbeck, G.M.; Yiou, F. Presence of the Solar de Vries Cycle (~205 years) during the Last Ice Age. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2001, 28, 303–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wagner, G.; Laj, C.; Beer, J.; Kissel, C.; Muscheler, R.; Masarik, J.; Synal, H.-A. Reconstruction of the paleoaccumulation rate of central Greenland during the last 75 kyr using the cosmogenic radionuclides 36Cl and 10Be and geomagnetic field intensity data. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2001, 193, 515–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Frank, M.; Backman, J.; Jakobsson, M.; Moran, K.; O’Regan, M.; King, J.; Haley, B.A.; Kubik, P.W.; Garbe-Schönberg, D. Beryllium isotopes in central Arctic Ocean sediments over the past 12.3 million years: Stratigraphic and paleoclimatic implications. Paleoceanography 2008, 23, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dannhaus, N.; Wittmann, H.; Krám, P.; Christl, M.; von Blanckenburg, F. Catchment-wide weathering and erosion rates of mafic, ultramafic, and granitic rock from cosmogenic meteoric 10Be/9Be ratios. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2018, 222, 618–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Maejima, Y.; Matsuzaki, H.; Nakano, C. 10Be concentrations of Red soils in Southwest Japan and its possibility of dating. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2004, 223–224, 596–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Maejima, Y.; Matsuzaki, H.; Higashi, T. Application of cosmogenic 10Be to dating soils on the raised coral reef terraces of Kikai Island, southwest Japan. Geoderma 2005, 126, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tsai, H.; Maejima, Y.; Hseu, Z.Y. Meteoric 10Be dating of highly weathered soils from fluvial terraces in Taiwan. Quat. Int. 2008, 188, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hao, Y.; Xu, Y.; Pan, S.; Song, X.; Zhang, K.; Guo, H.; Gu, Z. Sources of plutonium isotopes and 137Cs in coastal seawaters of Liaodong Bay and Bohai Strait, China and its environmental implications. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 130, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dong, W.; Zheng, J.; Guo, Q. Particle-size speciation of Pu isotopes in surface soils from Inner Mongolia (China) and its implications for Asian Dust monitoring. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2017, 120, 133–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Egli, M.; Brandová, D.; Böhlert, R.; Favilli, F.; Kubik, P.W. 10Be inventories in Alpine soils and their potential for dating land surfaces. Geomorphology 2010, 119, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Konz, N.; Prasuhn, V.; Alewell, C. On the measurement of alpine soil erosion. Catena 2012, 91, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alewell, C.; Meusburger, K.; Juretzko, G.; Mabit, L.; Ketterer, M.E. Suitability of 239+240Pu and 137Cs as tracers for soil erosion assessment in mountain grasslands. Chemosphere 2014, 103, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zollinger, B.; Alewell, C.; Kneisel, C.; Meusburger, K.; Brandová, D.; Kubik, P.; Schaller, M.; Ketterer, M.; Egli, M. The effect of permafrost on time-split soil erosion using radionuclides (137Cs, 239+240Pu, meteoric 10Be) and stable isotopes (δ13C) in the eastern Swiss Alps. J. Soils Sediments 2015, 15, 1400–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zollinger, B.; Alewell, C.; Kneisel, C.; Brandová, D.; Petrillo, M.; Plötze, M.; Christl, M.; Egli, M. Soil formation and weathering in a permafrost environment of the Swiss Alps: A multi-parameter and non-steady-state approach. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2017, 42, 814–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Meusburger, K.; Porto, P.; Mabit, L.; La Spada, C.; Arata, L.; Alewell, C. Excess Lead-210 and Plutonium-239+240: Two suitable radiogenic soil erosion tracers for mountain grassland sites. Environ. Res. 2018, 160, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Portes, R.; Dahms, D.; Brandová, D.; Raab, G.; Christl, M.; Kühn, P.; Ketterer, M.; Egli, M. Evolution of soil erosion rates in alpine soils of the Central Rocky Mountains using fallout Pu and δ13C. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2018, 496, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Lal, R.; Tims, S.G.; Fifield, L.K.; Wasson, R.J.; Howe, D. Applicability of 239Pu as a tracer for soil erosion in the wet-dry tropics of northern Australia. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2013, 294, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lal, R.; Fifield, L.K.; Tims, S.G.; Wasson, R.J.; Howe, D. A study of soil erosion rates using 239Pu, in the wet-dry tropics of Northern Australia. J. Environ. Radioact. 2020, 211, 106085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Velasco, H.; Astorga, R.T.; Joseph, D.; Antoine, J.S.; Mabit, L.; Toloza, A.; Dercon, G.; Walling, D.E. Adapting the Caesium-137 technique to document soil redistribution rates associated with traditional cultivation practices in Haiti. J. Environ. Radioact. 2018, 183, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schoonejans, J.; Vanacker, V.; Opfergelt, S.; Christl, M. Long-term soil erosion derived from in-situ 10Be and inventories of meteoric 10Be in deeply weathered soils in southern Brazil. Chem. Geol. 2017, 466, 380–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wilken, F.; Fiener, P.; Ketterer, M.; Meusburger, K.; Muhindo, D.I.; van Oost, K.; Doetterl, S. Assessing soil redistribution of forest and cropland sites in wet tropical Africa using 239+240 Pu fallout radionuclides. Soil 2021, 7, 399–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Waroszewski, J.; Egli, M.; Brandová, D.; Christl, M.; Kabala, C.; Malkiewicz, M.; Kierczak, J.; Glina, B.; Jezierski, P. Identifying slope processes over time and their imprint in soils of medium-high mountains of Central Europe (the Karkonosze Mountains, Poland). Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2018, 43, 1195–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Mabit, L.; Bernard, C.; Laverdière, M.R. Assessment of erosion in the Boyer River watershed (Canada) using a GIS oriented sampling strategy and 137Cs measurements. Catena 2007, 71, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mabit, L.; Chhem-Kieth, S.; Toloza, A.; Vanwalleghem, T.; Bernard, C.; Amate, J.I.; González de Molina, M.; Gómez, J.A. Radioisotopic and physicochemical background indicators to assess soil degradation affecting olive orchards in southern Spain. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 159, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Meliho, M.; Nouira, A.; Benmansour, M.; Boulmane, M.; Khattabi, A.; Mhammdi, N.; Benkdad, A. Assessment of soil erosion rates in a Mediterranean cultivated and uncultivated soils using fallout 137Cs. J. Environ. Radioact. 2019, 208–209, 106021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Quijano, L.; Beguería, S.; Gaspar, L.; Navas, A. Estimating erosion rates using 137Cs measurements and WATEM/SEDEM in a Mediterranean cultivated field. Catena 2016, 138, 38–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jelinski, N.A.; Campforts, B.; Willenbring, J.K.; Schumacher, T.E.; Li, S.; Lobb, D.A.; Papiernik, S.K.; Yoo, K. Meteoric Beryllium-10 as a Tracer of Erosion Due to Postsettlement Land Use in West-Central Minnesota, USA. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 2019, 124, 874–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Calitri, F.; Sommer, M.; Norton, K.; Temme, A.; Brandová, D.; Portes, R.; Christl, M.; Ketterer, M.E.; Egli, M. Tracing the temporal evolution of soil redistribution rates in an agricultural landscape using 239+240Pu and 10Be. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2019, 44, 1783–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Calitri, F.; Sommer, M.; van der Meij, M.W.; Egli, M. Soil erosion along a transect in a forested catchment: Recent or ancient processes? Catena 2020, 194, 104683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ouimet, W.; Dethier, D.; Bierman, P.; Wyshnytzky, C.; Shea, N.; Rood, D.H. Spatial and temporal variations in meteoric 10Be inventories and long-term deposition rates, Colorado Front Range. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2015, 109, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tuo, D.; Xu, M.; Gao, G. Relative contributions of wind and water erosion to total soil loss and its effect on soil properties in sloping croplands of the Chinese Loess Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 633, 1032–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jagercikova, M.; Cornu, S.; Bourlès, D.; Antoine, P.; Mayor, M.; Guillou, V. Understanding long-term soil processes using meteoric 10Be: A first attempt on loessic deposits. Quat. Geochronol. 2015, 27, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Poręba, G.J.; Śnieszko, Z.; Moska, P. Application of OSL dating and 137Cs measurements to reconstruct the history of water erosion: A case study of a Holocene colluvium in Świerklany, south Poland. Quat. Int. 2015, 374, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, X.; Quine, T.A.; Walling, D.E. Soil erosion rates on sloping cultivated land on the Loess Plateau near Ansai, Shaanxi Province, China: An investigation using 137Cs and rill measurements. Hydrol. Process. 1998, 12, 171–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Loba, A.; Waroszewski, J.; Tikhomirov, D.; Calitri, F.; Christl, M.; Sykuła, M.; Egli, M. Tracing erosion rates in loess landscape of the Trzebnica Hills (Poland) over time using fallout and cosmogenic nuclides. J. Soils Sediments 2021, 21, 2952–2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kaste, J.M.; Elmore, A.J.; Vest, K.R.; Okin, G.S. Groundwater controls on episodic soil erosion and dust emissions in a desert ecosystem. Geology 2016, 44, 771–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Abrahams, E.R.; Kaste, J.M.; Ouimet, W.; Dethier, D.P. Asymmetric hillslope erosion following wildfire in Fourmile Canyon, Colorado. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2018, 43, 2009–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. McKean, J.A.; Dietrich, W.E.; Finkel, R.C.; Southon, J.R.; Caffee, M.W. Quantification of soil production and downslope creep rates from cosmogenic 10Be accumulations on a hillslope profile. Geology 1993, 21, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Small, E.E.; Anderson, R.S.; Hancock, G.S. Estimates of the rate of regolith production using 10Be and 26Al from an alpine hillslope. Geomorphology 1999, 27, 131–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jungers, M.C.; Bierman, P.R.; Matmon, A.; Nichols, K.; Larsen, J.; Finkel, R. Tracing hillslope sediment production and transport with in situ and meteoric 10Be. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 2009, 114, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. West, N.; Kirby, E.; Bierman, P.; Slingerland, R.; Ma, L.; Rood, D.; Brantley, S. Regolith production and transport at the Susquehanna Shale Hills Critical Zone Observatory, Part 2: Insights from meteoric 10Be. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 2013, 118, 1877–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. West, N.; Kirby, E.; Bierman, P.; Clarke, B.A. Aspect-dependent variations in regolith creep revealed by meteoric 10Be. Geology 2014, 42, 507–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Graly, J.A.; Bierman, P.R.; Reusser, L.J.; Pavich, M.J. Meteoric 10Be in soil profiles—A global meta-analysis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2010, 74, 6814–6829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Alewell, C.; Pitois, A.; Meusburger, K.; Ketterer, M.; Mabit, L. 239+240Pu from “contaminant” to soil erosion tracer: Where do we stand? Earth-Sci. Rev. 2017, 172, 107–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. McHargue, L.R.; Damon, P.E. The global beryllium 10 cycle. Rev. Geophys. 1991, 29, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Monaghan, M.C.; Krishnaswami, S.; Turekian, K.K. The global-average production rate of 10Be. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1986, 76, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Willenbring, J.K.; von Blanckenburg, F. Meteoric cosmogenic Beryllium-10 adsorbed to river sediment and soil: Applications for Earth-surface dynamics. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2010, 98, 105–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Beer, J.; McCracken, K.; von Steiger, R. Cosmogenic Radionuclides. Theory and Applications in the Terrestial and Space Environments; Physics of Earth and Space Environments; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 53, ISBN 978-3-642-14650-3. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kaste, J.M.; Baskaran, M. Meteoric 7Be and 10Be as Process Tracers in the Environment. In Handbook of Environmental Isotope Geochemistry; Baskaran, M., Ed.; Advances in Isotope Geochemistry; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 1, pp. 61–85. ISBN 978-3-642-10636-1. [Google Scholar]
  55. Graly, J.A.; Reusser, L.J.; Bierman, P.R. Short and long-term delivery rates of meteoric10Be to terrestrial soils. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2011, 302, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kaste, J.M.; Norton, S.A.; Hess, C.T. Environmental Chemistry of Beryllium-7. Rev. Mineral. Geochemistry 2002, 50, 271–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pavich, M.J.; Brown, L.; Valette-Silver, J.N.; Klein, J.; Middleton, R. 10Be analysis of a Quaternary weathering profile in the Virginia Piedmont. Geology 1985, 13, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Boschi, V.; Willenbring, J.K. Chemical and physical drivers of beryllium retention in two soil endmembers. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 141591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. You, C.-F.; Lee, T.; Li, Y.-H. The partition of Be between soil and water. Chem. Geol. 1989, 77, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pavich, M.J.; Brown, L.; Harden, J.; Klein, J.; Middleton, R. 10Be distribution in soils from Merced River terraces, California. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1986, 50, 1727–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Vesely, J.; Norton, S.A.; Skrivan, P.; Majer, V.; Kram, P.; Navratil, T.; Kaste, J.M. Environmental Chemistry of Beryllium. Rev. Mineral. Geochemistry 2002, 50, 291–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bacon, A.R.; Richter, D.D.B.; Bierman, P.R.; Rood, D.H. Coupling meteoric 10Be with pedogenic losses of 9Be to improve soil residence time estimates on an ancient North American interfluve. Geology 2012, 40, 847–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pavich, M.J.; Brown, L.; Klein, J.; Middleton, R. 10Be accumulation in a soil chronosequence. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1984, 68, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Takahashi, Y.; Minai, Y.; Ambe, S.; Makide, Y.; Ambe, F. Comparison of adsorption behavior of multiple inorganic ions on kaolinite and silica in the presence of humic acid using the multitracer technique. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1999, 63, 815–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ritchie, J.C.; McHenry, J.R. Application of Radioactive Fallout Cesium-137 for Measuring Soil Erosion and Sediment Accumulation Rates and Patterns: A Review. J. Environ. Qual. 1990, 19, 215–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Xu, Y.; Qiao, J.; Pan, S.; Hou, X.; Roos, P.; Cao, L. Plutonium as a tracer for soil erosion assessment in northeast China. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 511, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nelson, D.M.; Lovett, M.B. Oxidation state of plutonium in the Irish Sea. Nature 1978, 276, 599–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Penrose, W.R.; Metta, D.N.; Hylko, J.M.; Rinckel, L.A. The reduction of plutonium(V) by aquatic sediments. J. Environ. Radioact. 1987, 5, 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Choppin, G.R. Actinide speciation in aquatic systems. Mar. Chem. 2006, 99, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Eakins, J.D.; Morgan, A.; Baston, G.M.N.; Pratley, F.W.; Strange, L.P.; Burton, P.J. Measurements of α-emitting plutonium and americium in the intertidal sands of West Cumbria, UK. J. Environ. Radioact. 1990, 11, 37–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Iurian, A.-R.; Phaneuf, M.O.; Mabit, L. Mobility and Bioavailability of Radionuclides in Soils. In Radionuclides in the Environment. Influence of Chemical Speciation and Plant Uptake on Radionuclide Migration; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 38–59. [Google Scholar]
  72. Kim, C.S.; Lee, M.H.; Kim, C.K.; Kim, K.H. 90Sr, 137Cs, 239+240Pu and 238Pu concentrations in surface soils of Korea. J. Environ. Radioact. 1998, 40, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chibowski, S.; Zygmunt, J. The influence of the sorptive properties of organic soils on the migration rate of 137Cs. J. Environ. Radioact. 2002, 61, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Giannakopoulou, F.; Haidouti, C.; Chronopoulou, A.; Gasparatos, D. Sorption behavior of cesium on various soils under different pH levels. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 149, 553–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Livens, F.R.; Loveland, P.J. The influence of soil properties on the environmental mobility of caesium in Cumbria. Soil Use Manag. 1988, 4, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kabata-Pendias, A.; Mukherjee, A.B. (Eds.) Trace Elements of Group 1 (Previously Group Ia) BT—Trace Elements from Soil to Human; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 87–104. ISBN 978-3-540-32714-1. [Google Scholar]
  77. Tamura, T.; Jacobs, D.G. Structural implications in cesium sorption. Health Phys. 1960, 2, 391—398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Bertsch, P.M. Cesium-137 in floodplain sediments of the Lower Three Runs Creek on the DOE Savannah River Site. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2005, 264, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. García-Oliva, F.; Lugo, R.M.; Maass, J.M. Soil 137Cs activity in a tropical deciduous ecosystem under pasture conversion in Mexico. J. Environ. Radioact. 1995, 26, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Van Bergeijk, K.E.; Noordijk, H.; Lembrechts, J.; Frissel, M.J. Influence of pH, soil type and soil organic matter content on soil-to-plant transfer of radiocesium and -strontium as analyzed by a nonparametric method. J. Environ. Radioact. 1992, 15, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Matisoff, G.; Whiting, P.J. Measuring Soil Erosion Rates Using Natural (7Be, 210Pb) and Anthropogenic (137Cs, 239,240Pu) Radionuclides. In Handbook of Environmental Isotope Geochemistry; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 1–2, pp. 487–519. ISBN 9783642106378. [Google Scholar]
  82. Sanchez, A.L.; Wright, S.M.; Smolders, E.; Naylor, C.; Stevens, P.A.; Kennedy, V.H.; Dodd, B.A.; Singleton, D.L.; Barnett, C.L. High Plant Uptake of Radiocesium from Organic Soils Due to Cs Mobility and Low Soil K Content. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 2752–2757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sheppard, S.C. Robust Prediction of Kd from Soil Properties for Environmental Assessment. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2011, 17, 263–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wissocq, A.; Beaucaire, C.; Latrille, C. Application of the multi-site ion exchanger model to the sorption of Sr and Cs on natural clayey sandstone. Appl. Geochem. 2018, 93, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Siroux, B.; Beaucaire, C.; Tabarant, M.; Benedetti, M.F.; Reiller, P.E.; Wissocq, A.; Beaucaire, C.; Latrille, C. Adsorption of strontium and caesium onto an Na-MX80 bentonite: Experiments and building of a coherent thermodynamic modelling. Appl. Geochem. 2018, 93, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Nishiizumi, K.; Imamura, M.; Caffee, M.W.; Southon, J.R.; Finkel, R.C.; McAninch, J. Absolute calibration of 10Be AMS standards. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2007, 258, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Harden, J.W.; Fries, T.L.; Pavich, M.J. Cycling of beryllium and carbon through hillslope soils in Iowa. Biogeochemistry 2002, 60, 317–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Knudsen, M.F.; Egholm, D.L.; Jansen, J.D. Time-integrating cosmogenic nuclide inventories under the influence of variable erosion, exposure, and sediment mixing. Quat. Geochronol. 2019, 51, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Meusburger, K.; Mabit, L.; Ketterer, M.; Park, J.H.; Sandor, T.; Porto, P.; Alewell, C. A multi-radionuclide approach to evaluate the suitability of 239+240Pu as soil erosion tracer. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 566–567, 1489–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Mabit, L.; Martin, P.; Jankong, P.; Toloza, A.; Padilla-Alvarez, R.; Zupanc, V. Establishment of control site baseline data for erosion studies using radionuclides: A case study in East Slovenia. J. Environ. Radioact. 2010, 101, 854–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lal, D. New Nuclear Methods for Studies of Soil Dynamics Utilizing Cosmic Ray Produced Radionuclides. In Sustaining the Global Farm-10th International Soil Conservation Organization Meeting; Stott, D.E., Mohtar, R.H., Steinhardt, G.C., Eds.; Purdue University: West Lafayette, IN, USA; USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory: Washington, DC, USA, 2001; pp. 1044–1052. [Google Scholar]
  92. Campforts, B.; Vanacker, V.; Vanderborght, J.; Baken, S.; Smolders, E.; Govers, G. Simulating the mobility of meteoric 10Be in the landscape through a coupled soil-hillslope model (Be2D). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2016, 439, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Owens, P.N.; Walling, D.E. Spatial variability of caesium-137 inventories at reference sites: An example from two contrasting sites in England and Zimbabwe. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1996, 47, 699–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Sutherland, R.A. Examination of caesium-137 areal activities in control (uneroded) locations. Soil Technol. 1991, 4, 33–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Poręba, G.; Śnieszko, Z.; Moska, P.; Mroczek, P.; Malik, I. Interpretation of soil erosion in a Polish loess area using OSL, 137Cs, 210Pbex, dendrochronology and micromorphology—Case study: Biedrzykowice site (s Poland). Geochronometria 2019, 46, 57–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Sarmiento, J.L.; Gwinn, E. Strontium 90 fallout prediction. J. Geophys. Res. 1986, 91, 7631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Poreba, G.J. Caesium-137 as a soil erosion tracer: A review. Geochronometria 2006, 25, 37–46. [Google Scholar]
  98. Walling, D.E.; Quine, T.A. Calibration of caesium-137 measurements to provide quantitative erosion rate data. Land Degrad. Dev. 1990, 2, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kachanoski, R.G.; de Jong, E. Predicting the Temporal Relationship between Soil Cesium-137 and Erosion Rate. J. Environ. Qual. 1984, 13, 301–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhang, X.; Higgit, D.L.; Walling, D.E. A preliminary assessment of the potential for using caesium-137 to estimate rates of soil erosion in the Loess Plateau of China. Hydrol. Sci. J. 1990, 35, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Walling, D.E.; He, Q. Improved Models for Estimating Soil Erosion Rates from Cesium-137 Measurements. J. Environ. Qual. 1999, 28, 611–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. He, Q.; Walling, D.E. The distribution of fallout 137Cs and 210Pb in undisturbed and cultivated soils. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1997, 48, 677–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Owens, P.N.; Walling, D.E. The use of a numerical mass-balance model to estimate rates of soil redistribution on uncultivated land from 137Cs measurements. J. Environ. Radioact. 1998, 40, 185–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Van Oost, K.; Govers, G.; Van Muysen, W. A process-based conversion model for caesium-137 derived erosion rates on agricultural land: An integrated spatial approach. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2003, 28, 187–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Mietelski, J.W.; Was, B. Plutonium from Chernobyl in Poland. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1995, 46, 1203–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ketterer, M.E.; Zheng, J.; Yamada, M. Applications of Transuranics as Tracers and Chronometers in the Environment. In Handbook of Environmental Isotope Geochemistry; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 1–2, pp. 395–417. ISBN 9783642106378. [Google Scholar]
  107. Zheng, J.; Tagami, K.; Watanabe, Y.; Uchida, S.; Aono, T.; Ishii, N.; Yoshida, S.; Kubota, Y.; Fuma, S.; Ihara, S. Isotopic evidence of plutonium release into the environment from the Fukushima DNPP accident. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Kelley, J.M.; Bond, L.A.; Beasley, T.M. Global distribution of Pu isotopes and 237Np. Sci. Total Environ. 1999, 237–238, 483–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ketterer, M.E.; Hafer, K.M.; Link, C.L.; Kolwaite, D.; Wilson, J.; Mietelski, J.W. Resolving global versus local/regional Pu sources in the environment using sector ICP-MS. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2004, 19, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mabit, L.; Benmansour, M.; Walling, D.E. Comparative advantages and limitations of the fallout radionuclides 137Cs, 210Pbex and 7Be for assessing soil erosion and sedimentation. J. Environ. Radioact. 2008, 99, 1799–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Mabit, L.; Dercon, G.; Benmansour, M.; Walling, D.E. Use of 137Cs,210Pbex and 7Be for documenting soil redistribution: The future. In Guidelines for Using Fallout Radionuclides to Assess Erosion and Effectiveness of Soil Conservation Strategies; IAEA-TECDOC-1741; IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 2014; pp. 203–208. ISBN 978–92–0–105414–2. [Google Scholar]
  112. Pennock, D.J.; Lemmen, D.S.; De Jong, E. Cesium-137-measured erosion rates for soils of five parent-material groups in southwestern Saskatchewan. Can. J. Soil Sci. 1995, 75, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Monaghan, M.C.; Krishnaswami, S.; Thomas, J.H. 10Be concentrations and the long-term fate of particle-reactive nuclides in five soil profiles from California. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1983, 65, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Van Pelt, R.S.; Zobeck, T.M.; Ritchie, J.C.; Gill, T.E. Validating the use of 137Cs measurements to estimate rates of soil redistribution by wind. Catena 2007, 70, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Schuller, P.; Walling, D.; Sepúlveda, A.; Trumper, R.; Rouanet, J.; Pino, I.; Castillo, A. Use of 137Cs measurements to estimate changes in soil erosion rates associated with changes in soil management practices on cultivated land. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2004, 60, 759–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Evans, R.; Collins, A.L.; Zhang, Y.; Foster, I.D.L.; Boardman, J.; Sint, H.; Lee, M.R.F.; Griffith, B.A. A comparison of conventional and 137Cs-based estimates of soil erosion rates on arable and grassland across lowland England and Wales. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2017, 173, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Quijano, L.; Gaspar, L.; Navas, A. Spatial patterns of SOC, SON, 137Cs and soil properties as affected by redistribution processes in a Mediterranean cultivated field (Central Ebro Basin). Soil Tillage Res. 2016, 155, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Benmansour, M.; Mabit, L.; Nouira, A.; Moussadek, R.; Bouksirate, H.; Duchemin, M.; Benkdad, A. Assessment of soil erosion and deposition rates in a Moroccan agricultural field using fallout 137Cs and 210Pbex. J. Environ. Radioact. 2013, 115, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Porto, P.; Callegari, G. Using 137Cs measurements to estimate soil erosion rates in forest stands affected by wildfires. Results from plot experiments. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2021, 172, 109668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Saç, M.M.; İçhedef, M. Application of 137Cs technique for evaluation of erosion and deposition rates within cultivated fields of Salihli region, Western Turkey. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2015, 8, 477–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Zhang, W.; Xing, S.; Hou, X. Evaluation of soil erosion and ecological rehabilitation in Loess Plateau region in Northwest China using plutonium isotopes. Soil Tillage Res. 2019, 191, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zhang, K.; Pan, S.; Liu, Z.; Li, G.; Xu, Y.; Hao, Y. Vertical distributions and source identification of the radionuclides 239Pu and 240Pu in the sediments of the Liao River estuary, China. J. Environ. Radioact. 2018, 181, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Li, M.; Li, Z.; Liu, P.; Yao, W. Using Cesium-137 technique to study the characteristics of different aspect of soil erosion in the Wind-water Erosion Crisscross Region on Loess Plateau of China. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2005, 62, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Gharibreza, M.; Zaman, M.; Porto, P.; Fulajtar, E.; Parsaei, L.; Eisaei, H. Assessment of deforestation impact on soil erosion in loess formation using 137Cs method (case study: Golestan Province, Iran). Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 2020, 8, 393–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Hua-juni, F.; Xue-ming, Y.; Xiao-ping, Z.; Ai-zhenl, L. Using 137Cs Tracer Technique to Evaluate Erosion and Deposition of Black Soil in Northeast China. Pedosphere 2006, 16, 201–209. [Google Scholar]
  126. Yang, M.-Y.; Tian, J.-L.; Liu, P.-L. Investigating the spatial distribution of soil erosion and deposition in a small catchment on the Loess Plateau of China, using 137Cs. Soil Tillage Res. 2006, 87, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Fifield, L.K.; Wasson, R.J.; Pillans, B.; Stone, J.O.H. The longevity of hillslope soil in SE and NW Australia. Catena 2010, 81, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hoo, W.T.; Fifield, L.K.; Tims, S.G.; Fujioka, T.; Mueller, N. Using fallout plutonium as a probe for erosion assessment. J. Environ. Radioact. 2011, 102, 937–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Arata, L.; Alewell, C.; Frenkel, E.; A’Campo-Neuen, A.; Iurian, A.R.; Ketterer, M.E.; Mabit, L.; Meusburger, K. Modelling Deposition and Erosion rates with RadioNuclides (MODERN)—Part 2: A comparison of different models to convert 239+240Pu inventories into soil redistribution rates at unploughed sites. J. Environ. Radioact. 2016, 162–163, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. Musso, A.; Ketterer, M.E.; Greinwald, K.; Geitner, C.; Egli, M. Rapid decrease of soil erosion rates with soil formation and vegetation development in periglacial areas. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2020, 45, 2824–2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Schmidt, S.; Alewell, C.; Meusburger, K. Monthly RUSLE soil erosion risk of Swiss grasslands. J. Maps 2019, 15, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Lu, H.; Prosser, I.P.; Moran, C.J.; Gallant, J.C.; Priestley, G.; Stevenson, J.G. Predicting sheetwash and rill erosion over the Australian continent. Soil Res. 2003, 41, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Panagos, P.; Borrelli, P.; Poesen, J.; Ballabio, C.; Lugato, E.; Meusburger, K.; Montanarella, L.; Alewell, C. The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 54, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Fu, B.; Liu, Y.; Lü, Y.; He, C.; Zeng, Y.; Wu, B. Assessing the soil erosion control service of ecosystems change in the Loess Plateau of China. Ecol. Complex. 2011, 8, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Yang, X.M.; Zhang, X.P.; Deng, W.; Fang, H.J. Black soil degradation by rainfall erosion in Jilin, China. Land Degrad. Dev. 2003, 14, 409–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Borrelli, P.; Robinson, D.A.; Fleischer, L.R.; Lugato, E.; Ballabio, C.; Alewell, C.; Meusburger, K.; Modugno, S.; Schütt, B.; Ferro, V.; et al. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Sun, W.; Shao, Q.; Liu, J.; Zhai, J. Assessing the effects of land use and topography on soil erosion on the Loess Plateau in China. Catena 2014, 121, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ayt Ougougdal, H.; Khebiza, M.Y.; Messouli, M.; Bounoua, L.; Karmaoui, A. Delineation of vulnerable areas to water erosion in a mountain region using SDR-InVEST model: A case study of the Ourika watershed, Morocco. Sci. Afr. 2020, 10, e00646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Sheikh, V.; Kornejady, A.; Ownegh, M. Application of the coupled TOPSIS–Mahalanobis distance for multi-hazard-based management of the target districts of the Golestan Province, Iran. Nat. Hazards 2019, 96, 1335–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Fülöp, R.H.; Bishop, P.; Fabel, D.; Cook, G.T.; Everest, J.; Schnabel, C.; Codilean, A.T.; Xu, S. Quantifying soil loss with in-situ cosmogenic10Be and14C depth-profiles. Quat. Geochronol. 2015, 27, 78–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Arnhold, S.; Lindner, S.; Lee, B.; Martin, E.; Kettering, J.; Nguyen, T.T.; Koellner, T.; Ok, Y.S.; Huwe, B. Conventional and organic farming: Soil erosion and conservation potential for row crop cultivation. Geoderma 2014, 219–220, 89–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Meusburger, K.; Konz, N.; Schaub, M.; Alewell, C. Soil erosion modelled with USLE and PESERA using QuickBird derived vegetation parameters in an alpine catchment. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2010, 12, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Meusburger, K.; Evrard, O.; Alewell, C.; Borrelli, P.; Cinelli, G.; Ketterer, M.; Mabit, L.; Panagos, P.; van Oost, K.; Ballabio, C. Plutonium aided reconstruction of caesium atmospheric fallout in European topsoils. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 11858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Arata, L.; Meusburger, K.; Frenkel, E.; A’Campo-Neuen, A.; Iurian, A.R.; Ketterer, M.E.; Mabit, L.; Alewell, C. Modelling Deposition and Erosion rates with RadioNuclides (MODERN)—Part 1: A new conversion model to derive soil redistribution rates from inventories of fallout radionuclides. J. Environ. Radioact. 2016, 162–163, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Schaub, M.; Konz, N.; Meusburger, K.; Alewell, C. Application of in-situ measurement to determine 137Cs in the Swiss Alps. J. Environ. Radioact. 2010, 101, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Evrard, O.; Vandaele, K.; van Wesemael, B.; Bielders, C.L. A grassed waterway and earthen dams to control muddy floods from a cultivated catchment of the Belgian loess belt. Geomorphology 2008, 100, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Haase, D.; Fink, J.; Haase, G.; Ruske, R.; Pécsi, M.; Richter, H.; Altermann, M.; Jäger, K.D. Loess in Europe-its spatial distribution based on a European Loess Map, scale 1:2,500,000. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2007, 26, 1301–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Šimanský, V.; Juriga, M.; Mendyk, Ł. Slope position and management practices as factors influencing selected properties of topsoil. Soil Sci. Annu. 2019, 70, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Licznar, M.; Kowaliński, S.; Drozd, J. Changes of some physical properties of soils of the głubczyce plateau under the water erosion effect. Rocz. Glebozn. 1981, XXXII, 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  150. Poręba, G.; Śnieszko, Z.; Moska, P. Some aspects of age assessment of Holocene loess colluvium: OSL and 137Cs dating of sediment from Biała agricultural area, South Poland. Quat. Int. 2011, 240, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Zhang, J.; Yang, M.; Sun, X.; Zhang, F. Estimation of wind and water erosion based on slope aspects in the crisscross region of the Chinese Loess Plateau. J. Soils Sediments 2018, 18, 1620–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Aldahan, A.; Haiping, Y.; Possnert, G. Distribution of beryllium between solution and minerals (biotite and albite) under atmospheric conditions and variable pH. Chem. Geol. 1999, 156, 209–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Origin of meteoric 10Be, 137Cs and 239+240Pu in soils.
Figure 1. Origin of meteoric 10Be, 137Cs and 239+240Pu in soils.
Minerals 12 00359 g001
Figure 2. Meteoric 10Be concentrations and clay contents in soils of various environments [2,10,11,12,15,18,27,33,57,62,63].
Figure 2. Meteoric 10Be concentrations and clay contents in soils of various environments [2,10,11,12,15,18,27,33,57,62,63].
Minerals 12 00359 g002
Figure 3. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients calculated using data from 27 publications (Table S1) between soil properties of the bulk samples.
Figure 3. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients calculated using data from 27 publications (Table S1) between soil properties of the bulk samples.
Minerals 12 00359 g003
Figure 4. Beryllium speciation in aqueous solutions (total concentration of dissolved 10Be is = 0.02 M) from Takahashi et al. [64]. (A) In the absence of organic (“humic”) acid and (B) in the presence of organic acid (30 mg L−1). Reprinted from Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, vol. 63, Y. Takahashi, Y. Minai, S. Ambe, Y. Makide, F. Ambe, Comparison of adsorption behavior of multiple inorganic ions on kaolinite and silica in the presence of humic acid using the multitracer technique, pp. 815–836, 1999, with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 4. Beryllium speciation in aqueous solutions (total concentration of dissolved 10Be is = 0.02 M) from Takahashi et al. [64]. (A) In the absence of organic (“humic”) acid and (B) in the presence of organic acid (30 mg L−1). Reprinted from Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, vol. 63, Y. Takahashi, Y. Minai, S. Ambe, Y. Makide, F. Ambe, Comparison of adsorption behavior of multiple inorganic ions on kaolinite and silica in the presence of humic acid using the multitracer technique, pp. 815–836, 1999, with permission from Elsevier.
Minerals 12 00359 g004
Figure 5. Sorption coefficient (kd) of 137Cs in soils as a function of pH [74,83,84,85].
Figure 5. Sorption coefficient (kd) of 137Cs in soils as a function of pH [74,83,84,85].
Minerals 12 00359 g005
Figure 6. Examples of different profile depth distributions of the studied isotopes in ploughed (A) and unploughed (B) soils: (A1,B1)—typical distribution, (A2,B2)—distribution with clay illuviation, (A3,B3)—distribution under erosion processes, (A4,B4)—distribution forced by deep mixing and (A5,B5)—distribution in polygenetic soils.
Figure 6. Examples of different profile depth distributions of the studied isotopes in ploughed (A) and unploughed (B) soils: (A1,B1)—typical distribution, (A2,B2)—distribution with clay illuviation, (A3,B3)—distribution under erosion processes, (A4,B4)—distribution forced by deep mixing and (A5,B5)—distribution in polygenetic soils.
Minerals 12 00359 g006
Figure 7. Worldwide isotopic studies (meteoric 10Be, 137Cs and 239+240Pu) dealing with the soil redistribution rates [2,11,12,15,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,32,33,34,35,36,38,39,40,41,42,57,60,62,63,66,79,87,89,92,95,104,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130].
Figure 7. Worldwide isotopic studies (meteoric 10Be, 137Cs and 239+240Pu) dealing with the soil redistribution rates [2,11,12,15,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,32,33,34,35,36,38,39,40,41,42,57,60,62,63,66,79,87,89,92,95,104,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130].
Minerals 12 00359 g007
Figure 8. Compilation of published soil erosion rates determined with meteoric 10Be, 137Cs and 239+240Pu in different environments. Negative values = erosion and positive values = accumulation.
Figure 8. Compilation of published soil erosion rates determined with meteoric 10Be, 137Cs and 239+240Pu in different environments. Negative values = erosion and positive values = accumulation.
Minerals 12 00359 g008
Table 1. Comparison of 10Be, 137Cs and 239+240Pu characteristics.
Table 1. Comparison of 10Be, 137Cs and 239+240Pu characteristics.
Meteoric 10Be239+240Pu137Cs
Element categoryalkaline earth metalactinide metalalkali metal
Oxidation stateIIIII, IV, V and VII
Origincosmogenic radionuclide that is constantly produced by the spallation of oxygen and nitrogen by cosmic rays in the upper atmosphere and at the Earth’s surfacedistributed globally due to nuclear weapon fabrication and testing and nuclear power plants accidents, as well as nuclear fuel reprocessingdistributed globally due to nuclear weapon fabrication and testing, nuclear power plants accidents, as well as nuclear fuel reprocessing
Adsorptionon clay and fine particles, organic matterassociated with organic matter, sesquioxides and clay particlesmostly bound to the fine mineral (clay) fraction
Half-life1.387 Myr239Pu 24 110 y and 240Pu 6561 y30.17 y
Time range in erosion studieslong-term erosion rates (millennia)medium-term erosion rates (50–60 years)medium-term erosion rates (50–60 years)
MeasurementAMSICP-MS and AMSgamma-ray spectrometry (counting the 662 keV gamma line), ICP MS
RemarksThe depth distribution of meteoric 10Be might be used to assess the occurrence of soil-mixing processes.New tool which has been applied since more than one decade in a few countries. Proposed as an alternative to 137Cs.Difficulties in application in large part of Europe due to heterogeneous fallout caused by the Chernobyl accident. Moreover, due to short half-life over 70% of 137Cs decayed.
The depth distribution might be used to assess the occurrence of soil-mixing processes.The depth distribution might be used to assess the occurrence of soil-mixing processes.
Table 2. Published soil erosion rates based on various isotopes and conversion models (only publications considered where both were available: isotope content and calculation of the soil redistribution rates).
Table 2. Published soil erosion rates based on various isotopes and conversion models (only publications considered where both were available: isotope content and calculation of the soil redistribution rates).
NoAuthorLocationSoil TextureNumber of ProfilesLand UseSoil Erosion Rates (t ha−1 y1)
Meteoric 10Be137Cs239+240Pu(R)USLE ***
1Maejima et al. [11]Coral reef terraces, Southwest JapanC, SiC, CL9Arable land−0.098 to −0.31 a,*--n.d. **
2Tsai et al. [12]Fluvial terraces, TaiwanC, SiC, CL3n.d. **−0.125 to −0.263 a--n.d. **
3Egli et al. [15]Swiss and Italian AlpsLS, SL6Mixed forest/alpine grassland−0.6 to −2.50 a−0.03 to −0.6 b--−0.1 to −0.5 [131]
4Fifield et al. [127]Fingerpost Hill, Burra Creek, NW and SE Australian.d. **13Forest and Pasture−0.03 to −0.19 a −0.1 to −5.0 [132]
5Campforts et al. [92]Susquehanna Shale Hills Observatory, USAn.d.n.d. **Arable land−0.10 to 1.37 c n.d.
6Zollinger et al. [19]Swiss AlpsLS, SL18Alpine grassland−0.34 to −1.29 a−0.08 to 1.8 b--−1.0 to −0.3 [131]
7Schoonejans et al. [25]Critical Zone Observatory, Southern Braziln.d. **3Subtropical forest−0.33 to −0.42 d−0.05 to −0.06 e--n.d.
8Waroszewski et al. [27]Karkonosze Mountains, PolandSL, SiL5Mountain forest−1.3 to −6.4 f−0.8 to −2.0 g--−2.0 to −5.0 [133]
9Jelinski et al. [32]West-Central Minnesota, USAL5Arable land−0.06 to 4.13 hn.d. n.d.
10Zhang et al. [39]Ansai, ChinaSiL9Arable land −65.0 to 110.0 i-−50 to −80 [134]
11Van Oost et al. [104]Huldenberg, central BelgiumSiLn.d. **Arable land −10.3 to 9.0 j-−0.5 to −1.0 [133]
12Schuller et al. [115]Coastal Mountain range of the 9th Region of Chilen.d. **6Arable land −28.0 to 12.0 i-n.d.
13Fang et al. [125]Jilin Province, ChinaCL5Arable land −26.43 to 27.28 k−37.63 to 34.33 i-−45.0 to −4.0 [135]
14Yang et al. [126]Shaanxi Province, ChinaSiL197Forest and arable land −25.0 to 150.0 i,m-−23.1 [135]
15Mabit et al. [28]Boyer River watershed, CanadaSL, SCL412Arable land-−9 to 6.4 i-−3.0 [28]
16Mabit et al. [29]Montefrio, SpainCL8Arable land −19.0 to 25.0 i-−10 to −20 [133]
17Benmansour et al. [118]Marchouch, MoroccoC45Arable land −4.0 to −30.0 i-−4.0 to −56.0 [118]
18Murat Sac and Ichedef [120]Salihi Region, Western Turkeyn.d. **4Arable land-−21.1 to 11.3 i−9.6 to 19.4 k-n.d.
19Poręba et al. [38]Świerklany, South PolandSiL4Arable land-−26.7 to 85.1 i-−10.0 to −20.0 [133]
20Quijano et al. [117]Ebro Basin, Spainn.d.156Arable land −19.8 to 7.4 i-−10.0 to −20.0 [133]
21Velasco et al. [24]Forêts des Pins, HaitiC12Arable land-−23 to 71 l-−20 to −50 [136]
22Tuo et al. [36]Chinese Loess PlateauSL7Arable land-−21.39 to −37.31 i-−23.1 [137]
23Poręba et al. [95]Biedrzykowice, South PolandSiL4Arable land-−4.9 to 39.9 i, k-−10.0 to −20.0 [133]
24Meliho et al. [30]Ourika Watershed, High Atlas of MoroccoSL, L33Arable land and forest-−32.23 to −0.06 i−11.42 to 2.27 m-up to −45.0 [138]
25Gharibreza et al. [124]Golestan Province, IranSiL, SiC93Arable land and forest-−10 to −35.9 i-up to −70.0 [139]
26Xu et al. [140]Liaodong Bay, Northeast Chinan.d.6Arable land and uncultivated land with low vegetation cover-−14.0 to −42.5 i−20.3 to −72.0 jn.d.
27Meusburger et al. [89]headwater catchment of Lake Soyang, South KoreaSL25Forest and arable land-−23.8 to 2.9 m−17.5 to 3.6 l−30.6 to −54.8 [141]
28Meusburger et al. [20]Swiss Central AlpsLS, SL14Alpine grassland-−5.2 to −6.7 l−3.3 to −7.0 o−2.0 to −12.0 [142]
29Lal et al. [22]Daly river basin, Northern Australian.d.6Arable land--−7.5 to −19.5 k−8.5 to −19.7 i−10.0 to −50.0 [132]
30Alewell et al. [17]Swiss Central AlpsLS, SL44Alpine grassland--−8.9 to 8.3 m−1.9 to 7.0 k−0.2 to −16.4 n−2.0 to −12.0 [142]
31Arata et al. [129]Swiss Central AlpsLS, SL5Mountain grassland--−8.4 to 9.8 o−2.0 to −12.0 [142]
32Portes et al. [21]Central Rocky Mountains, USALS, SL3Alpine tundra/forest--−2.60 to −5.20 k,mn.d.
33Zhang et al. [121]Gansu Province, ChinaSiL6Forest (before agriculture) -−9.4 to 7.2 i−23.1 [137]
34Lal et al. [23]The Daily River Catchment, Northern AustraliaL3Pasture, mahogany and peanut plantations--−8.4 to 7.2 i−10 to −50 [132]
35Loba et al. [40]Trzebnica Hills, Southwest PolandSiL, L Arable land −1.17 to 10.93 o−5.0 to −10.0 [133]
36Zollinger et al. [18]Eastern Swiss AlpsLS, SL19Alpine tundra/natural forest−0.40 to 0.04 b−1.35 to 1.41 m−1.20 to 2.04 m−1.0 to −2.0 [131]
37Calitri et al. [33]Uckermark Region, Northeast GermanySL, L3Arable land−2.11 to 0.26 b-−0.25 to 7.6 mup to −0.5 [133]
* Negative values mean erosion, positive deposition. ** No data. *** Authors are given in the brackets. Soil texture: SL—sandy loam, LS—loamy sand, L—loam, SiL—silt loam, SCL—sandy clay loam, SiC—silty clay, CL—clay loam and C—clay. Models: a Steady-state approach, b non-steady-state approach, c Be2D model, d not-corrected values, e corrected values, f assuming that the uppermost horizon has the same origin as the underlying soil, g the uppermost horizon is not considered due to its different origin, h integration of Be2D and LODO, i mass balance model, j integration of mass balance and spatial models, k proportional model, l diffusion and migration model, m profile distribution model, n inventory method and o MODERN.
Table 3. Summary of some main potential problems in applying isotopes as a soil tracer and possibilities for overcoming them.
Table 3. Summary of some main potential problems in applying isotopes as a soil tracer and possibilities for overcoming them.
EnvironmentLand UseDifficultiesSolutions
Alpine sites, Loess areasGrasslands, Forests,
Arable lands
Heterogenous fallout of 137Cs (Nuclear weapons tests and nuclear power plants fallout), which affects the calculation of soil erosion rates.To overcome this limitation, both sources of 137Cs have to be taken into account in the calculation model. The separation of global fallout from e.g., the Chernobyl fallout may be done by estimating the initial inventory of 137Cs (described in Poręba et al. [95]) or by the determination of 239+240Pu/137Cs activity ratios at reference sites (described in Meusburger et al. [20,143]).
Coral reef and fluvial terraces, Alpine sitesGrasslands, Forests,
Arable lands
When meteoric 10Be is used, the erosion/deposition rates obtained with the model of Lal [91], sometimes may raise doubts. Especially in soils exhibiting clay illuviation or podzolisation.Application of different models, e.g., proposed by Egli et al. [15], Be2D model [92] and LODO [32]
TropicsArable landsWhen soil is cultivated with traditional manual tillage practices, features of significant tillage mixing does not occur. Thus, conversion models for cultivated sites cannot be used.A conversion model developed for undisturbed soils has to be applied [24].
Alpine sitesForestsCover beds or different overlaying parent materials for soil development exist. The topsoil, for example, may have aeolian silt admixture, whereas this is not the case for the subsoil. The interpretation of long-term erosion rates may be hampered.Calculation of erosion rates with and without considering the topsoil may give indications about the range of results [27].
Acidic soilsForestsIn acidic soils, the considered isotopes may in part be solubilised and, thus, be leached.Determination of a potential loss of meteoric 10Be from the parent material, using chemical mass losses of stable 9Be in a regolith profile [25,62]. The concepts and models for 137Cs and 239+240Pu under acidic conditions still need to be improved.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Loba, A.; Waroszewski, J.; Sykuła, M.; Kabala, C.; Egli, M. Meteoric 10Be, 137Cs and 239+240Pu as Tracers of Long- and Medium-Term Soil Erosion—A Review. Minerals 2022, 12, 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12030359

AMA Style

Loba A, Waroszewski J, Sykuła M, Kabala C, Egli M. Meteoric 10Be, 137Cs and 239+240Pu as Tracers of Long- and Medium-Term Soil Erosion—A Review. Minerals. 2022; 12(3):359. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12030359

Chicago/Turabian Style

Loba, Aleksandra, Jarosław Waroszewski, Marcin Sykuła, Cezary Kabala, and Markus Egli. 2022. "Meteoric 10Be, 137Cs and 239+240Pu as Tracers of Long- and Medium-Term Soil Erosion—A Review" Minerals 12, no. 3: 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12030359

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop