Next Article in Journal
Towards Identification of Zircon Populations in Permo-Carboniferous Rhyolites of Central Europe: Insight from Automated SEM-Mineral Liberation Analyses
Next Article in Special Issue
High-Pressure Raman and Infrared Spectroscopic Study of Prehnite
Previous Article in Journal
Dismembered Ophiolite of the Olkhon Composite Terrane (Baikal, Russia): Petrology and Emplacement
Previous Article in Special Issue
Incorporation of Incompatible Strontium and Barium Ions into Calcite (CaCO3) through Amorphous Calcium Carbonate
Article

Structure and Behavior of the Ni End-Member Schreibersite Ni3P under Compression to 50 GPa

1
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
2
Hawai’i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2020, 10(4), 306; https://doi.org/10.3390/min10040306
Received: 15 February 2020 / Revised: 19 March 2020 / Accepted: 27 March 2020 / Published: 30 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mineral Physics—In Memory of Orson Anderson)

Abstract

To better understand the potential presence of light element alloys of Fe and Ni in the Earth’s interior, the crystal structure and compressional behavior of the Ni-P binary compound, schreibersite (Ni3P), have been investigated using synchrotron X-ray diffraction experiments. Both powder and two single-crystal samples of synthetic Ni3P (in different orientations with respect to the loading axis of the diamond anvil cell) were compressed up to approximately 50 GPa at ambient temperature. The compressional data obtained for Ni3P were fitted with a 3rd order Birch–Murnaghan equation of state. All data indicated that the c/a ratio of unit cell parameters remained approximately constant up to about 30 GPa but then increased progressively with pressure, exhibiting a second slight discontinuity at approximately 40 GPa. The changes in unit cell parameters at ~30 GPa and ~40 GPa suggested discontinuous changes in magnetic ordering. Moreover, the threshold of these subtle discontinuities is sensitive to the stress state and orientation of the crystal in the diamond anvil cell. This study is the first report on the compressional behavior of both powder and single-crystal schreibersite at high-pressure (up to 50 GPa). It offers insights into the effects of Ni3P components on the compressional behavior of the Earth’s core.
Keywords: schreibersite; high pressure; diamond anvil cell; synchrotron x-ray diffraction; single-crystal x-ray diffraction schreibersite; high pressure; diamond anvil cell; synchrotron x-ray diffraction; single-crystal x-ray diffraction

1. Introduction

Knowledge of the chemical composition and physical properties of the Earth’s interior comes mostly from seismic observations, geophysical modeling, direct observation of surface rocks, and the study of meteorites [1,2,3]. Unfortunately, at present, Earth’s deep interior cannot be directly sampled due to engineering limitations, as the deepest hole that has been drilled thus far reached only approximately 12 km [4]. Consequently, experimental investigations at high pressures and high temperatures have played an essential role in studying the Earth’s interior. The Earth’s core is believed to be comprised primarily of an iron-nickel (Fe-Ni) alloy. Still, a light element (sulfur, phosphorus, oxygen, etc.) component appears to be required as well, based upon current models and observations [1,2,3,5]. From seismic evidence, we know that the density of Earth’s core is approximately 10% lower than that of pure Fe at the estimated core pressure and temperature [2,5,6]. The current interpretation of this density deficit involves the presence of a significant amount of nickel, along with small amounts (up to 10%) of one or more light elements such as sulfur, phosphorus, oxygen, silicon, hydrogen, carbon, and potassium [1,3,7]. In addition to reducing the density, the presence of light elements in Fe-Ni alloys also affects the elastic properties and acoustic wave velocities of the core. For example, alloying of Fe with silicon increases both the compressional and shear wave velocities, whereas adding Ni decreases the compressional and shear wave velocities [8]. To better understand the evolution and formation of the Earth’s core in terms of discrete material properties, experimentally measured elasticity and other physical parameters of potential alloys present in the Earth’s core are required.
Among light elements suspected to be present in the core, phosphorus (P) is particularly interesting, because of its importance for life. P is present in the structure of living cells, helps to carry genetic information, is part of DNA, the fundamental building blocks of life, and contributes to adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the energy currency of life [9,10]. Although estimated concentration of P in the core is rather low (~0.2%) [3,11], phosphide minerals, especially Fe-Ni-P alloys that are found in iron-meteorites, such as iron monophosphide (FeP) [12,13], nickel monophosphide (NiP) [14], allabogdanite ((Fe, Ni)2P (orthorhombic)) [15], barringerite ((Fe, Ni)2P) (hexagonal)) [16,17,18], schreibersite ((Fe, Ni)3P (tetragonal)) [19,20,21], nickel-phosphide ((Ni, Fe)3P) (tetragonal)) [22,23], or melliniite ((Ni, Fe)4P) [24], have long been studied to understand the formation of planetary bodies.
Natural schreibersite ((Fe, Ni)3P), occurs as a minor phase in iron and stony-iron meteorites [19], where it usually shows a higher Fe than Ni content. Compositions with Ni content greater than 50% are called nickel phosphide [23]. Schreibersite has a metallic luster, a density of 7.0–7.3 g/cm3, and hardness of 6.5–7 on the Mohs scale. It forms tetragonal crystals with perfect 001 cleavage and non-centrosymmetric space group I-4 [25]. In the schreibersite unit cell, there are four atomic positions in crystallographically non-equivalent 8g Wyckoff sites. Three of these are occupied by a metallic atom (Fe, Ni), while the fourth holds the P atom [25,26]. Although occurrences of schreibersite on the Earth’s surface are rare, the implications of the possible presence of schreibersite in the deep interior might be important for the origin of life on Earth [10]. It is believed that meteoritic phosphide minerals, including schreibersite, could have been one of the primary sources of phosphorus on the early Earth [27,28]. Moreover, the concentration of phosphorus has a strong effect on the melting temperature in the Fe-P-S system [13].
The synthesis of minerals using high-pressure and temperature experimental techniques has given us insight into how these materials respond to the external forces that act on rocks at depth. Numerous previous studies have looked at alloys of Fe, Ni, and various light elements. Still, this research has focused primarily on Fe-rich compounds because Fe is the major component in the core. Pure Fe is stable in a hexagonal close-packed (hcp) crystal structure above ~10 GPa at 300 K [29,30], while pure Ni is stable in a face-centered cubic (fcc) structure at high pressure [31,32,33]. Alloying between iron and nickel leads to the stabilization of the fcc phase at high pressure and low temperature [30,32,33]. Another observation is that the value of the axial ratio (c/a) of the hcp-Fe phase is lower than the theoretical estimate. This has an effect on the longitudinal anisotropy of the hcp phase and might influence the seismic anisotropy of the Earth’s core [32,34].
The possibility of forming alloys and solid compounds between Fe and light elements has stimulated a range of experimental studies that consider the stability, physical properties, and behavior of such phases, including schreibersite Fe end-member, Fe3P, [19,35], as well as the isostructural Fe3S [36,37,38,39]. Intriguing discontinuous behavior has been reported in Fe3P, including, for example, a change in its c/a ratio on compression, attributed to changes in magnetic ordering [35]. A non-quenchable high-temperature phase of Fe3P was discovered above 1600 K at 64 GPa [35]. The isostructural Fe3S, is stable up to 220 GPa and 3300 K [39]. However, it also undergoes a magnetic collapse at 21 GPa, with the disordered magnetic moment affecting the elasticity and thermodynamics of this phase [36].
The Earth’s core mainly consists of Fe, but the effects of Ni, the second major element, may also be significant, although they have not been investigated systematically. Constraining the properties of the Ni end-member of schreibersite is essential for understanding schreibersite’s reactivity. It is crucial for proper modeling of solid solution phases with intermediate Fe/Ni ratios consistent with observations from meteorites. Thus, this investigation focuses on the study of the crystal structure and behavior of Ni end-member schreibersite (Ni3P), specifically its crystal structure, at high pressures using synchrotron powder x-ray diffraction and synchrotron single-crystal X-ray diffraction.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Single Crystal X-Ray Diffraction at Ambient Conditions

The Ni3P compound used in all our studies was synthesized by Dr. Nabil Boctor, at the Carnegie Institution for Science, from a stoichiometric mixture of elemental Ni and P in a molar ratio of 3:1, fused in a silica tube at 1000 °C and 1 atm in a high-temperature furnace. Ambient pressure measurements were conducted at the University of Hawai’i at Manoa X-ray Atlas Diffraction Laboratory, using a Bruker D8 Venture single crystal diffractometer equipped with a PHOTON-II CPAD detector and an Ag kα IμS microfocus source (0.56089 Å) Hawai’i. A synthetic single-crystal approximately 0.10 × 0.08 × 0.02 mm in size was mounted on a Kapton loop and then aligned with the center of the instrument using a goniometer head. The data collection was conducted using APEX3 software (Version 2018.1-0, Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, WI, USA) [40]. The atomic positions, bond lengths, and angles were determined with the SHELXL program (Version 2018, Göttingen, Germany) [41].

2.2. High-Pressure X-Ray Diffraction

High-pressure single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiments were conducted at beamline 13BM-C of Advanced Photon Source (APS), Argonne National Laboratory. Two separate experiments were performed on the synthetic Ni3P. Experiment 1 used synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction. Finely ground powder of Ni3P was loaded into the diamond anvil cell with 0.300 mm culet-size standard diamonds mounted on asymmetric backing plates (cubic boron nitride towards the X-ray source and tungsten carbide towards the detector). A piece of Re metal foil with an initial thickness of 0.255 mm was pre-indented to 0.039 mm. The sample chamber was made by drilling a 0.180 mm diameter, laser-cut hole in the pre-indented gasket. A piece of gold foil and a ruby sphere were placed in the sample chamber, next to the sample for pressure calibration [42,43,44]. The diamond anvil cell (DAC) was loaded to ~0.5 GPa with neon as a pressure medium using the GSECARS/COMPRES gas loading system [45]. A monochromatic incident beam with a wavelength of 0.434 Å (28.6 keV) was used. The incident beam was focused to a spot of approximately 0.015 by 0.015 mm with a pair of Kirkpatrick–Baez mirrors. A MAR165 charge-coupled device (CCD, Rayonix L.L.C, Evanston, IL, USA) detector for recording the diffraction images was placed approximately 180 mm from the sample. Lanthanum hexaboride (LaB6) powder was used to calibrate the distance and the tilting of the detector. The total angular opening of the DAC was ±12°. The sample was kept motionless during the exposure, with a typical exposure time of 5 s. The data were integrated and converted to 1-dimensional diffraction patterns using the Dioptas program [46].
Experiment 2 employed the synchrotron single-crystal x-ray diffraction technique. Two synthetic single-crystals of Ni3P, C1, and C2, with approximate sizes of 0.040 × 0.025 × 0.005 mm and 0.020 × 0.020 × 0.005 mm, respectively, were loaded into the DAC with standard diamonds (0.300 mm cutlets). The diamond anvils were mounted on asymmetric backing plates (cubic boron nitride towards the X-ray source and tungsten carbide towards the detector). Crystal C1 was oriented with the (001) direction perpendicular to the diamond’s cutlet, and C2 was oriented with the (001) parallel to the cutlet. The Re metal foil with an initial thickness of 0.255 mm was pre-indented to 0.045 mm, and the sample chamber was prepared by laser-cutting a 0.180 mm diameter hole in the pre-indented gasket using laser cutting. Gold foil and two ruby spheres were placed in the sample chamber, next to the samples for pressure calibration [42,43,44]. The DAC was loaded to ~0.5 GPa with neon as a pressure medium using the GSECARS/COMPRES gas loading system [45]. The characteristics of the beam and the instrument in experiment 2 were the same as in experiment 1. The total angular range (φ ) covered during the scans ranged from 57 to 123° (with a total angular opening of ±33°). A series of step and wide-step φ-exposures were collected. Step scans involved 1° angular increments, and wide-step scans used 9.8° angular increments. The sample was rotated at a constant speed during the exposure, with a typical exposure time of 1s/deg. The single-crystal X-ray diffraction data were analyzed with GSE_ADA and Reciprocal Space Viewer (RSV), as described in Reference [47]. The refinement of the crystal structure was done using the program SHELXL [41].

3. Results

3.1. Single Crystal X-Ray Diffraction at Ambient Conditions

The unit cell parameters of the Ni end-member schreibersite (Ni3P) measured in our single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiment at ambient pressure. The measurements were as follows: a = 8.9515(2) Å, c = 4.3859(1) Å, and V0 = 351.44(8) Å3, consistent with the tetragonal structure with I-4 space group [48,49,50]. The fractional atomic coordinates and interatomic distances (bonding distances) in Ni3P at ambient pressure are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. The structure of Ni3P determined in this experiment is shown in Figure 1. The final figure of merit of the structure refinement, R1 obtained in this experiment, was 0.0239.

3.2. High-Pressure X-Ray Diffraction

The powder experiment was conducted in the pressure range of 0.5–46.0 GPa at ambient temperature. The unit cell parameters obtained from the powder data at the first pressure point are a = 8.945(1) Å, and c = 4.381(1) Å, consistent with the tetragonal structure. The crystal structure of Ni3P remained tetragonal on compression to 46.0 GPa (Table 3). The ratio of the unit cell parameters (c/a) as a function of pressure remained constant with minor scatter around 0.4897(1) below 35.0 GPa. Above 35.0 GPa, the c/a ratio increased noticeably and approached 0.492(1) at 46.0 GPa (Figure 2). The normalized lattice parameters (a/a0 and c/c0) showed a decrease at a continuous rate for both parameters up to 46 GPa. Meanwhile, the slope of c changed discontinuously at 35 GPa (Figure 2), resulting in a change in the c/a ratio.
The single crystal experiment was conducted over the pressure range 1.1–49.5 GPa at ambient temperature. Given the different orientation of the two sample crystals, the corresponding diffraction patterns were different, as shown in Figure 1. The unit cell parameters of the two samples are shown in Table 4. The unit cell parameters at 1.1 GPa confirmed that both single crystals were tetragonal, with a = 8.939(1) Å, and c = 4.378(2) Å for C1 and a = 8.936(1) Å, c = 4.375(1) Å for C2. Similar to the powder experiment, the c/a ratio was approximately constant at around 0.4899(3) below 30.0 GPa but started increasing significantly above that pressure, approaching 0.4928(4) at 49.5 GPa. For crystal C2, although the ratio of the cell parameter c/a below 25 GPa was constant at around 0.4897(2), it started to increase substantially above that pressure and reaches 0.4931(6) at 49.5 GPa, as shown in Figure 2. Moreover, between 40 and 45 GPa, both single crystals exhibited a slight change in the c/a ratio, which remained approximately constant at 0.4924(4). The normalized lattice parameters (a/a0 and c/c0) for the single crystal experiment revealed that there was a slight decrease in the slope of the c-axis at 30 GPa for C1 and 25 GPa for C2. This contributed to the change in the c/a ratio in both crystals, as shown in Figure 2.
The volume and pressure data from all experiments in this project were fit with a 3rd order Birch–Murnaghan equation of state (BM-EoS) using the EOS-FIT7 program [51]. Based on the independently-constrained value for the ambient unit cell volume (V0 = 351.44(8) Å3), for all data below the first transition of both powder and two single-crystal, the bulk modulus for schreibersite (KT0) was 195(2) GPa and the first derivative of the bulk modulus (KT0) was 4.5(2). The BM-EoS fit of powder data below 35 GPa yielded a bulk modulus of KT0 = 190(4) GPa, and its pressure derivative K’= 4.9(4). A discontinuity in incompressibility was observed at 35 GPa. For the single crystal experiment, the BM-EoS fit of C1 data below 30 GPa yielded the values KT0 = 199(5) GPa, K’ = 4.7(4). Similarly, for C2, the volume data below 25 GPa were fit by 3rd BM-EoS, yielding KT0 = 194(5) GPa, K’ = 4.7(8). The results of the BM-EoS fits in each sample are plotted in Figure 3. However, the data above the first discontinuity fit with the 2nd BM-EoS yielded V0 = 352.22(2) Å3, KT0 = 194(10) GPa.
The changes in bulk modulus as a function of pressure can be represented in the form of normalized pressure (F = P(3f(1 + 2f)5/2) − 1) versus a Eulerian strain (f = 0.5((V0/V)2/3 − 1)) plot [52]. The F-f plot from all data indicates K’ > 4 (Figure 4). The linear character of all three F-f plots suggested that the second pressure derivative of the bulk modulus (K’’) was negligible. EoS fit confidence ellipses are used for a visual assessment of the quality of the correlation between KT0 and K’ (Figure 5). The confidence ellipses from all our data on Ni3P are shown in Figure 5, drawn at a 95.4% confidence level (2σ), and it indicates that all calculated KT0 and K’ values from this study are internally consistent.

4. Discussion

4.1. Crystal Structure at Ambient Condition.

The ambient unit cell parameters and interatomic distances of Ni3P determined in this study are in good agreement with previous reports [48,49,50]. The atomic coordinates of Ni3P determined in our single-crystal experiment represent the opposite absolute structure configuration of the mineral, which is a well-known phenomenon for molecules or crystals without a center of symmetry or mirror plane [53]. The space group of Ni3P (I-4) does not include an inversion center (it is acentric). The fractional atomic coordinates from our experiments have been transformed to follow the convention used by previous studies [48,49,50]. However, despite differences in the absolute configuration, the structure of Ni3P in this experiment is in excellent agreement with previously reported results.

4.2. Crystal Structure Evolution on Compression to 50 GPa

At ambient conditions, the unit cell parameters and volume of Ni3P are slightly smaller than the ones of Fe3P [19,35,54]. This shows that the unit cell parameters are controlled mainly by the cation size, as the ionic radius of nickel (~1.24 Å) is smaller than that of iron (~1.26 Å) [55].
In the powder sample, the c/a ratio starts to increase at 40 GPa; the same behavior is observed in single-crystal at 30 GPa in single crystal 1 and single-crystal 2 at 25 GPa (Figure 2). The experimental results indicate that the axial compressibility of Ni3P is almost identical up to the transition point, above which the c-axis becomes less compressible. Differences in the transition pressure observed in the three experiments (powder, C1, and C2) indicate that the stress state and the orientation of the uniaxial stress component have a controlling effect over the transition point.
The sensitivity of some phase changes to uniaxial stress has been reported in the scientific literature. For example, first-principles calculations were used to predict the formation of a previously unknown high-pressure phase of SiO2 with five-coordinated silicon that forms in response to stress applied to α-quartz, along a specific crystal orientation [56]. In SiO2 α–cristobalite, two-phase changes to cristobalite II and cristobalite X-I are either observed [57] or suppressed [58] depending on the degree of hydrostaticity and stress rate. CuGeO3 is one of the best-known examples of a material that is sensitive to uniaxial stress, with the ambient pressure phase going through two different series of phase changes depending on the degree of non-hydrostaticity [59].
In the three comparative experiments conducted in this study, the pressure medium and stress fields were very similar (Ne). Neon is a good soft quasi-hydrostatic medium, but at pressures above 20 GPa, it starts displaying signs of uniaxial stress [60]. The three samples in our experiments were oriented in different ways in the stress field of the diamond anvil cell, which featured an enhanced uniaxial component aligned with the loading axis. The two single crystals had either the [100] or [001] directions exposed explicitly to the uniaxial stress. In contrast, in the powder samples, individual grains had all possible orientations to the uniaxial stress. We do not know the exact dependence of the phase change transition point on the direction of the uniaxial stress. It is hypothetically possible, for example, that the strongest effect would be associated with the [110] or [011] directions, rather than the principal directions [100] or [001]. The observed transition pressures for the two single crystals are both lower than the transition point observed for the powder sample. It is worth noting that the nature of the discontinuity in the single crystal and powder experiments was different. Single crystals seemed to transform through an immediate single-crystal to the single-crystal mechanism, with no evidence of two-phase coexistence. In the powder sample, there was most likely a two-phase coexistence with populations of differently oriented powder grains undergoing the phase change at different pressures, and relative phase fractions changing gradually. However, this effect was difficult to quantify, given the continuous nature of changes in the unit cell parameters.
Very similar effects observed in Fe3P and Fe3S have been attributed to changes in magnetic ordering [35,37,38]; therefore, we assume that the nature of the discontinuity in Ni3P is of magnetic origin. However, we did not directly measure magnetic properties to provide direct proof of this interpretation. We were also not able to conclusively verify the existence of the second transition due to the small number of pressure points collected above 40 GPa. Gu et al. [35] reported a magnetic collapse in Fe3P around 40 GPa corresponding to a change of symmetry from I-4 to P4/mnc, based on first-principle calculations. The discontinuities in lattice parameters and volume as a function of pressure observed in our experiments at approximately 30 GPa and 40 GPa might be related to displacive phase changes. The change in the trend of the c/a ratio of Ni3P in our experiments was also very similar to the magnetic transition and analogous c/a change observed in Cr2O3 [61,62]. The decreasing compressibility of the c-axis, contributing to the discontinuity in the c/a ratio trend, suggests that there are differences in the magnetic structure of schreibersite below and above the transition point [54].
The bulk modulus (KT0) of Ni3P from this experiment was in good agreement with the results of the first-principles calculations [63]. Moreover, the values of KT0 and K’ of Ni3P from our experiments were higher than values reported for isostructural compounds such as Fe3P [19,35], Fe3S [36,37,38,39], and Ni3S [64]. This outcome suggested that the compressibility was controlled mainly by the cation size. Interestingly, KT0 and K’ of Fe3P and Fe3S have quite similar values within the uncertainty, whereas KT0 and K’ of Ni3P are higher than Ni3S. This indicates that changing the anion has a small effect on the compressibility behavior between Fe3P and Fe3S. However, the effect on the compressibility between Ni3P and Ni3S is stronger. The cause of the difference is that the synthetic Ni3P in this paper was a stoichiometric compound, while Ni3S in the earlier studies was non-stoichiometric. Moreover, the studies on Ni3S were conducted only up to about 10 GPa, whereas we compressed our sample to approximately 50 GPa. If we focus only on the first 10 GPa of compressibility data, we also find that the trend of the c/a ratio of C1 is decreasing slightly over this range. Thus, to study the effect of the anion size between Ni3P and Ni3S, one might have to compress both samples to pressures higher than 10 GPa using samples as close to stoichiometric as possible.

4.3. Implications for Planetary Cores

To assess the effect the presence of Ni-rich schreibersite would have on the Earth’s core, we compared the densities of pure iron, Fe3P, and Ni3P at pressures corresponding to the inner and outer core. It should be noted that these calculations were performed by extrapolating our results far beyond the range of conditions covered in our experiments based on a geothermal equation. The comparison showed that the density of Ni3P from this experiment and Fe3P from Gu et al. [35] was approximately 5% lower than the pure Fe at core pressure and ambient temperature. This result suggests that the presence of a significant amount of nickel and light elements such as phosphorus has the effect of lowering the density, consistent with the observed deficit in the density of the core as determined from seismic evidence [2,5,6]. Although our experiments did not include a study of the effects of high temperature on the unit cell parameter of Ni3P, to a very simplified first approximation, we can compare the cold compressibility curves.
Gu et al., [35] argued that the discontinuities observed around 17 and 40 GPa were not only consistent with the calculated magnetic transitions but also probably produced discontinuous changes in the coefficient of thermal expansion. The thermal expansion coefficient α(p) decreases with increasing pressure. By analogy, we can assume that the compressional discontinuities observed in our experiments for Ni3P at approximately 30 GPa and 40 GPa might also be related to discontinuities of thermal expansion and magnetic transitions. Thermal expansion decreases at high pressure, and with increasing bond energy, contributes to the high melting point. Therefore, at high pressure, most materials stay in the solid-state to much higher temperatures than at low pressure. At ambient pressure, Ni3P has a melting point (~960 °C) lower than Fe3P (~1100 °C) and pure iron (~1500 °C), which implies that addition of Ni3P to natural schreibersite lowers the melting point [65,66,67].
The presence of Ni leads to loss of ferromagnetic order in Fe3P because Ni causes a decrease of the magnetic moment [68,69]. Ni3P is less compressible than pure hcp-Fe or iron phosphide phase, including Fe3P [19,35]. Moreover, first-principles calculations on Ni3P, Fe3P, and pure hcp-Fe suggest that the shear modulus of Ni3P is lower than Fe3P and pure hcp-Fe by approximately 30% and 20%, respectively [63,70,71]. The higher incompressibility and lower shear modulus of Ni3P are consistent with the decrease of shear wave velocity of Fe under pressure when adding Ni to Fe-compounds [8].

5. Conclusions

The results of our diamond anvil cell experiments suggest that the volume and unit cell parameters of Ni3P experience two discontinuities, at approximately 30 GPa and 40 GPa, which may be associated with corresponding magnetic transitions. The results of this study also illustrate that the transition c-axis of Ni3P becomes less compressible than the a-axis. The discontinuity is sensitive to the stress state and orientation of the crystal in the diamond anvil cell. Moreover, the experiments suggest that substituting Ni into Fe-bearing compounds results in higher incompressibility of the mineral.
Further investigations of Fe-Ni alloys, including more direct measurements of their magnetic properties, are needed to explain the observed transitions fully more fully. Moreover, to reliably model core conditions, additional measurements will need to be conducted at a higher pressure and high temperature.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.C. and P.D.; methodology, S.C., D.Z., and P.D.; software, D.Z. and P.D.; validation, S.C., D.Z., and P.D.; formal analysis, S.C.; investigation, S.C., D.Z., and P.D.; resources, P.D.; data curation, S.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.C.; writing—review and editing, S.C., D.Z., and P.D.; visualization, S.C.; supervision, P.D.; project administration, S.C.; funding acquisition, P.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partly supported by the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the W.M Keck Foundation, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the State of Illinois. Use of the APS was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. The development of the X-ray Atlas instrument was funded by NSF EAR Infrastructure and Facilities grant 1541516.

Acknowledgments

We thank Nabil Boctor from the Carnegie Institution of Science for providing the synthesic sample. The X-ray diffraction work was conducted using the X-ray Atlas instrument at the University of Hawai’i. We are also grateful to the staff of GeoSoilEnviroCARS (Sector 13-BM-C), Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, for their assistance with data collection. We also thank Robert Rapp for help with editing the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. McDonough, W.F.; Sun, S.S. The composition of the Earth. Chem. Geol. 1995, 120, 223–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Allègre, C.J.; Poirier, J.P.; Humler, E.; Hofmann, A.W. The chemical composition of the Earth. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1995, 134, 515–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Litasov, K.D.; Shatskiy, A.F. Composition of the Earth’s core. Russ. Geol. Geophys. 2016, 57, 22–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kozlovsky, Y.A. The world’s deepest well. Sci. Am. 1984, 251, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Birch, F. Elasticity and constitution of the Earth’s interior. J. Geophys. Res. 1952, 57, 227–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, J.; Fei, Y. Experimental constraints on core composition. Treatise Geochem. 2003, 2, 568. [Google Scholar]
  7. Poirier, J.P. Light elements in the Earth’s outer core: A critical review. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 1994, 85, 319–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, J.F.; Struzhkin, V.V.; Sturhahn, W.; Huang, E.; Zhao, J.; Hu, M.Y.; Alp, E.E.; Mao, H.K.; Boctor, N.; Hemley, R.J. Sound velocities of iron-nickel and iron-silicon alloys at high pressures. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2003, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Maciá, E.; Hernández, M.V.; Oró, J. Primary sources of phosphorus and phosphates in chemical evolution. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 1997, 27, 459–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bryant, D.E.; Greenfield, D.; Walshaw, R.D.; Johnson, B.R.; Herschy, B.; Smith, C.; Pasek, M.A.; Telford, R.; Scowen, I.; Munshi, T.; et al. Hydrothermal modification of the Sikhote-Alin iron meteorite under low pH geothermal environments. A plausibly prebiotic route to activated phosphorus on the early Earth. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2013, 109, 90–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. McDonough, W.F. 3.16–Compositional model for the Earth’s core. Treatise Geochem (2nd edition). 2014, 3, 559–577. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gu, T.; Wu, X.; Qin, S.; Dubrovinsky, L. In situ high-pressure study of FeP: Implications for planetary cores. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2011, 184, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Stewart, A.J.; Schmidt, M.W. Sulfur and phosphorus in the Earth’s core: The Fe-P-S system at 23 GPa. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2007, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dera, P.; Lazarz, J.D.; Lavina, B. Pressure-induced development of bonding in NiAs type compounds and polymorphism of NiP. J. Solid State Chem. 2011, 184, 1997–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Britvin, S.N.; Rudashevsky, N.S.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Burns, P.C.; Polekhovsky, Y.S. Allabogdanite, (Fe, Ni)2P, a new mineral from the Onello meteorite: The occurrence and crystal structure. Am. Mineral. 2002, 87, 1245–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Brandstätter, F.; Koeberl, C.; Kurat, G. The discovery of iron barringerite in lunar meteorite Y-793274. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1991, 55, 1173–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Buseck, P.R. Phosphide from meteorites: Barringerite, a new iron-nickel mineral. Science 1969, 165, 169–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dera, P.; Lavina, B.; Borkowski, L.A.; Prakapenka, V.B.; Sutton, S.R.; Rivers, M.L.; Downs, R.T.; Prewitt, C.T. Structure and behavior of the barringerite Ni end-member, Ni2P, at deep Earth conditions and implications for natural Fe-Ni phosphides in planetary cores. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2009, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Geist, V.; Wagner, G.; Nolze, G.; Moretzki, O. Investigations of the meteoritic mineral (Fe, Ni)3P. Cryst. Res. Technol. J. Exp. Ind. Crystallogr. 2005, 40, 52–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Scott, H.P.; Huggins, S.; Frank, M.R.; Maglio, S.J.; Martin, C.D.; Meng, Y.; Santillán, J.; Williams, Q. Equation of state and high-pressure stability of Fe3P -schreibersite: Implications for phosphorus storage in planetary cores. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2007, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. He, X.J.; Guo, J.Z.; Wu, X.; Huang, S.X.; Qin, F.; Gu, X.P.; Qin, S. Compressibility of natural schreibersite up to 50 GPa. Phys. Chem. Miner. 2019, 46, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Britvin, S.N.; Kolomenskii, V.D.; Boldyreva, M.M.; Bogdanova, A.N.; Kretser, Y.L.; Boldyreva, O.N.; Rudashevskii, N.S. Nickelphosphide (Ni, Fe)3P, the nickel analog of schreibersite. 3AПИCKИ POCCИЙCKOГO MИHEPAЛOГИЧECKOГO OБЩECTBA 1999, 128, 64–72. [Google Scholar]
  23. Skála, R.; Drábek, M. Nickelphosphide from the Vicenice octahedrite: Rietveld crystal structure refinement of synthetic analogue. Mineral. Mag. 2003, 67, 783–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pratesi, G.; Bindi, L.; Moggi-Cecchi, V. Icosahedral coordination of phosphorus in the crystal structure of melliniite, a new phosphide mineral from the Northwest Africa 1054 acapulcoite. Am. Mineral. 2006, 91, 451–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Skála, R.; Císařová, I. Crystal structure of meteoritic schreibersite: Determination of absolute structure. Phys. Chem. Miner. 2005, 31, 721–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pritekel, C. The crystal structure of meteoritic schreibersite: Refinement of the absolute crystal structure. Bachelor’s Thesis, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA, January 2015. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pasek, M.A.; Lauretta, D.S. Aqueous corrosion of phosphide minerals from iron meteorites: A highly reactive source of prebiotic phosphorus on the surface of the early Earth. Astrobiology 2005, 5, 515–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gull, M.; Mojica, M.A.; Fernández, F.M.; Gaul, D.A.; Orlando, T.M.; Liotta, C.L.; Pasek, M.A. Nucleoside phosphorylation by the mineral schreibersite. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 17198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hemley, R.J.; Mao, H.K. In situ studies of iron under pressure: New windows on the Earth’s core. Int. Geol. Rev. 2001, 43, 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kuwayama, Y.; Hirose, K.; Sata, N.; Ohishi, Y. Phase relations of iron and iron–nickel alloys up to 300 GPa: Implications for composition and structure of the Earth’s inner core. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2008, 273, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huang, E.; Bassett, W.A.; Weathers, M.S. Phase relationships in Fe-Ni alloys at high pressures and temperatures. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 1988, 93, 7741–7746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lin, J.F.; Heinz, D.L.; Campbell, A.J.; Devine, J.M.; Shen, G. Iron-silicon alloy in Earth’s core? Science 2002, 295, 313–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mao, W.L.; Campbell, A.J.; Heinz, D.L.; Shen, G. Phase relations of Fe–Ni alloys at high pressure and temperature. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2006, 155, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Steinle-Neumann, G.; Stixrude, L.; Cohen, R.E.; Gülseren, O. Elasticity of iron at the temperature of the Earth’s inner core. Nature 2001, 413, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gu, T.; Fei, Y.; Wu, X.; Qin, S. High-pressure behavior of Fe3P and the role of phosphorus in planetary cores. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2014, 390, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fei, Y.; Li, J.; Bertka, C.M.; Prewitt, C.T. Structure type and bulk modulus of Fe3S, a new iron-sulfur compound. Am. Mineral. 2000, 85, 1830–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lin, J.F.; Fei, Y.; Sturhahn, W.; Zhao, J.; Mao, H.K.; Hemley, R.J. Magnetic transition and sound velocities of Fe3S at high pressure: Implications for Earth and planetary cores. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2004, 226, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Seagle, C.T.; Campbell, A.J.; Heinz, D.L.; Shen, G.; Prakapenka, V.B. Thermal equation of state of Fe3S and implications for sulfur in Earth’s core. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2006, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kamada, S.; Terasaki, H.; Ohtani, E.; Sakai, T.; Kikegawa, T.; Ohishi, Y.; Hirao, N.; Sata, N.; Kondo, T. Phase relationships of the Fe-FeS system in conditions up to the Earth’s outer core. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2010, 294, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bruker. APEX3 Crystallography Software Suite; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Crystallogr. 2008, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Heinz, D.L.; Jeanloz, R. The equation of state of the gold calibration standard. J. Appl. Phys. 1984, 55, 885–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mao, H.K.; Bell, P.M.; Shaner, J.T.; Steinberg, D.J. Specific volume measurements of Cu, Mo, Pd, and Ag and calibration of the ruby R1 fluorescence pressure gauge from 0.06 to 1 Mbar. J. Appl. Phys. 1978, 49, 3276–3283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mao, H.K.; Xu, J.A.; Bell, P.M. Calibration of the ruby pressure gauge to 800 kbar under quasi-hydrostatic conditions. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 1986, 91, 4673–4676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rivers, M.; Prakapenka, V.B.; Kubo, A.; Pullins, C.; Holl, C.M.; Jacobsen, S.D. The COMPRES/GSECARS gas-loading system for diamond anvil cells at the Advanced Photon Source. High Press. Res. 2008, 28, 273–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Prescher, C.; Prakapenka, V.B. DIOPTAS: A program for reduction of two-dimensional X-ray diffraction data and data exploration. High Press. Res. 2015, 35, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dera, P.; Zhuravlev, K.; Prakapenka, V.; Rivers, M.L.; Finkelstein, G.J.; Grubor-Urosevic, O.; Tschauner, O.; Clark, S.M.; Downs, R.T. High pressure single-crystal micro X-ray diffraction analysis with GSE_ADA/RSV software. High Press. Res. 2013, 33, 466–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Aronsson, B. The crystal structure of Ni3P.(Fe3P-Type). Acta Chem. Scand. 1955, 9, 137–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rundqvist, S.; Hassler, E.; Lundvik, L. Refinement of Ni3P Structure. Acta Chem. Scand. 1962, 16, 242. [Google Scholar]
  50. Jun, R.E.N.; Wang, J.G.; Li, J.F.; Li, Y.W. Density functional theory study on crystal nickel phosphides. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2007, 35, 458–464. [Google Scholar]
  51. Gonzalez-Platas, J.; Alvaro, M.; Nestola, F.; Angel, R. EosFit7-GUI: A new graphical user interface for equation of state calculations, analyses and teaching. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2016, 49, 1377–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Birch, F. Finite strain isotherm and velocities for single-crystal and polycrystalline NaCl at high pressures and 300 K. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 1978, 83, 1257–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Flack, H.D. Chiral and achiral crystal structures. Helv. Chim. Acta 2003, 86, 905–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Howard, J.W. Finite strain studies of single crystal Fe3P under high pressures. Master’s Thesis, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  55. Greenwood, N.N.; Earnshaw, A. Chemistry of the Elements; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  56. Badro, J.; Teter, D.M.; Downs, R.T.; Gillet, P.; Hemley, R.J.; Barrat, J.L. Theoretical study of a five-coordinated silica polymorph. Phys. Rev. B 1997, 56, 5797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dove, M.T.; Craig, M.S.; Keen, D.A.; Marshall, W.G.; Redfern, S.A.T.; Trachenko, K.O.; Tucker, M.G. Crystal structure of the high-pressure monoclinic phase-II of cristobalite, SiO2. Min. Mag. 2000, 64, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dera, P.; Lazarz, J.D.; Prakapenka, V.B.; Barkley, M.; Downs, R.T. New insights into the high-pressure polymorphism of SiO2 cristobalite. Phys. Chem. Miner. 2011, 38, 517–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dera, P.; Jayaraman, A.; Prewitt, C.T.; Gramsch, S.A. Structural basis for high-pressure polymorphism in CuGeO3. Phys. Rev. B 2002, 65, 134105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Klotz, S.; Chervin, J.C.; Munsch, P.; Le Marchand, G. Hydrostatic limits of 11 pressure transmitting media. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2009, 42, 075413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dera, P.; Lavina, B.; Meng, Y.; Prakapenka, V.B. Structural and electronic evolution of Cr2O3 on compression to 55 GPa. J. Solid State Chem. 2011, 184, 3040–3049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Golosova, N.O.; Kozlenko, D.P.; Kichanov, S.E.; Lukin, E.V.; Liermann, H.P.; Glazyrin, K.V.; Savenko, B.N. Structural and magnetic properties of Cr2O3 at high pressure. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 722, 593–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhao, D.; Zhou, L.; Du, Y.; Wang, A.; Peng, Y.; Kong, Y.; Sha, C.; Ouyang, Y.; Zhang, W. Structure, elastic and thermodynamic properties of the Ni–P system from first-principles calculations. Calphad 2011, 35, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Urakawa, S.; Matsubara, R.; Katsura, T.; Watanabe, T.; Kikegawa, T. Stability and bulk modulus of Ni3S, a new nickel sulfur compound, and the melting relations of the system Ni-NiS up to 10 GPa. Am. Mineral. 2011, 96, 558–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lyman, T. Metallography, Structures and Phase Diagrams, Metal Handbook; American Society for Metals: Metals Park, OH, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  66. Okamoto, H. Fe-P (Iron-Phosphorus). J. Phase Equilibria Diffus. 2007, 28, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kim, T.Y.; Son, H.J.; Lim, S.K.; Song, Y.I.; Park, H.S.; Suh, S.J. Electroless Nickel Alloy Deposition on SiO2 for Application as a Diffusion Barrier and Seed Layer in 3D Copper Interconnect Technology. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2014, 14, 9515–9524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Gambino, R.J.; McGuire, T.R.; Nakamura, Y. Magnetic Properties of the Iron-Group Metal Phosphides. J. Appl. Phys. 1967, 38, 1253–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Goto, M.; Tange, H.; Tokunaga, T.; Fujii, H.; Okamoto, T. Magnetic properties of the (Fe1−xMx)3P compounds. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1977, 16, 2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, L.H.; Wang, W.L.; Hu, L.; Wei, B.B. First-principle calculations of structural, elastic and thermodynamic properties of Fe–B compounds. Intermetallics 2014, 46, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wu, J.; Chong, X.; Zhou, R.; Jiang, Y.; Feng, J. Structure, stability, mechanical and electronic properties of Fe–P binary compounds by first-principles calculations. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 81943–81956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The crystal structure of Ni3P at ambient pressure and temperature.
Figure 1. The crystal structure of Ni3P at ambient pressure and temperature.
Minerals 10 00306 g001
Figure 2. The c/a axial ratio of Ni3P at different pressures at room temperature. The graphs at the top-left corner are the normalized lattice parameters (a/a0 and c/c0) of Ni3P from this study.
Figure 2. The c/a axial ratio of Ni3P at different pressures at room temperature. The graphs at the top-left corner are the normalized lattice parameters (a/a0 and c/c0) of Ni3P from this study.
Minerals 10 00306 g002
Figure 3. The volume-pressure curves represent the compression data of Ni3P from high-pressure syn-XRD experiments.
Figure 3. The volume-pressure curves represent the compression data of Ni3P from high-pressure syn-XRD experiments.
Minerals 10 00306 g003
Figure 4. F-f plots for the Ni3P compression below the first transition indicate that the second pressure derivative of the bulk modulus (K’’) is negligible.
Figure 4. F-f plots for the Ni3P compression below the first transition indicate that the second pressure derivative of the bulk modulus (K’’) is negligible.
Minerals 10 00306 g004
Figure 5. The confidence ellipses from all our data on Ni3P are drawn at a 95.4% level, indicating that all calculated K0 and K’ values from this study are consistent.
Figure 5. The confidence ellipses from all our data on Ni3P are drawn at a 95.4% level, indicating that all calculated K0 and K’ values from this study are consistent.
Minerals 10 00306 g005
Table 1. Fractional atomic coordinates of Ni3P at ambient pressure and temperature (numbers in parentheses represent errors in the last digit).
Table 1. Fractional atomic coordinates of Ni3P at ambient pressure and temperature (numbers in parentheses represent errors in the last digit).
Elementxyz
Ni0.9228(1)0.8887(1)0.7608(1)
Ni0.6353(1)0.9675(1)0.0219(1)
Ni0.8313(1)0.7802(1)0.2458(1)
P0.7139(1)0.9517(1)0.5192(2)
Table 2. Bonding interatomic distances in Ni3P at ambient pressure and temperature.
Table 2. Bonding interatomic distances in Ni3P at ambient pressure and temperature.
Atom pairInteratomic Distance (Å)
NiI–NiI2.425(1), 2.710(1) × 2, 2.859(1)
NiI–NiII2.649(1)
NiI–NiIII2.478(1), 2.592(1), 2.708(1), 2.732(1), 2.813(1)
NiII–NiII2.491(1), 2.669(1), 2.669(1)
NiII–NiIII2.511(1), 2.544(1), 2.618(1)
NiIII–NiIII2.687(1), 2.687(1)
NiI–P2.222(1), 2.284(1)
NiII–P2.296(1), 2.317(1), 2.318(1), 2.345(1)
NiIII–P2.214(1), 2.278(1), 2.337 (1)
Table 3. Pressure dependence of the unit cell parameters of Ni3P determined in the powder diffraction experiment.
Table 3. Pressure dependence of the unit cell parameters of Ni3P determined in the powder diffraction experiment.
Pressure (GPa)a [Å]c [Å]Volume [A3]
0.50(1)8.945(1)4.381(1)350.5(1)
3.6(2)8.901(1)4.360(1)345.5(1)
5.8(4)8.874(1)4.345(1)342.2(1)
6.9(3)8.853(4)4.336(2)339.9(4)
8.0(3)8.842(1)4.330(1)338.5(1)
9.3(3)8.824(1)4.321(1)336.5(1)
10.9 (4)8.801(2)4.311(2)334.0(2)
12.9(5)8.781(4)4.301(4)331.6(5)
15.0(5)8.755(2)4.288(2)328.6(3)
16.5(5)8.739(2)4.280(1)326.9(2)
19.0(5)8.709(4)4.267(3)323.6(4)
21.5(5)8.692(1)4.257(1)321.6(2)
21.8(1)8.683(2)4.253(1)320.6(2)
24.0(4)8.663(6)4.242(3)318.4(6)
25.8(4)8.646(2)4.233(2)316.4(2)
27.7(4)8.629(3)4.225(2)314.6(3)
29.5(5)8.616(2)4.218(1)313.1(2)
31.9(5)8.592(4)4.207(3)310.5(4)
33.4(4)8.581(3)4.200(1)309.4(3)
35.2(3)8.569(4)4.194(2)308.0(4)
36.6(4)8.556(2)4.189(2)306.7(2)
38.5(4)8.536(3)4.180(1)304.6(3)
41.0(2)8.518(4)4.174(3)302.9(4)
42.2(2)8.499(5)4.170(3)301.2(5)
44.1(1)8.480(7)4.165(5)299.5(7)
46.0(2)8.467(7)4.163(7)298.4(8)
Table 4. Pressure dependence of the unit cell parameters of Ni3P determined in the single crystal experiment.
Table 4. Pressure dependence of the unit cell parameters of Ni3P determined in the single crystal experiment.
Pressure (GPa)Crystala [Å]c [Å]Volume [A3]
1.1(1)C18.939(1)4.378(2)349.8(2)
C28.936(1)4.375(1)349.4(1)
3.1(2)C18.911(1)4.363(1)346.4(1)
C28.906(1)4.362(1)346.0(1)
5.1(3)C18.883(1)4.350(2)343.3(2)
C28.876(1)4.348(1)342.6(1)
7.4(4)C18.853(1)4.334(2)339.7(1)
C28.851(1)4.334(1)339.5(1)
10.2(5)C18.823(1)4.321(1)336.4(1)
C28.819(1)4.318(1)335.8(1)
11.9(3)C18.799(1)4.309(2)333.6(2)
C28.797(1)4.307(2)333.3(2)
14.3(1)C18.768(1)4.294(2)330.1(2)
C28.767(1)4.293(2)330.0(1)
16.2(2)C18.749(1)4.286(3)328.1(2)
C28.745(1)4.282(2)327.5(2)
18.5(8)C18.727(1)4.276(2)325.7(2)
C28.721(1)4.271(2)324.9(2)
20.2(6)C18.706(1)4.266(2)323.4(2)
C28.702(1)4.262(3)322.8(2)
22.5(5)C18.685(1)4.256(3)321.0(2)
C28.677(1)4.250(3)319.9(2)
25.0(6)C18.664(1)4.244(3)318.6(3)
C28.655(1)4.243(3)317.8(3)
27.0(7)C18.643(1)4.235(3)316.3(2)
C28.634(2)4.234(4)315.7(3)
29.1(5)C18.623(1)4.226(4)314.3(3)
C28.608(2)4.223(4)312.9(3)
30.0(3)C18.613(1)4.224(3)313.4(3)
C28.599(2)4.223(1)311.0(1)
32.3(8)C18.594(1)4.220(4)311.7(3)
C28.581(2)4.216(4)310.4(3)
33.3(3)C18.579(1)4.215(4)310.2(3)
C28.568(2)4.211(4)309.1(3)
35.2(8)C18.565(1)4.212(4)309.0(3)
C28.551(2)4.204(5)307.5(3)
38.0(7)C18.539(2)4.200(5)306.2(3)
C28.521(2)4.193(5)304.5(4)
39.4(4)C18.529(1)4.197(4)305.3(3)
C28.514(2)4.191(5)303.8(4)
40.6(3)C18.519(1)4.193(3)304.3(3)
C28.501(2)4.184(5)302.4(4)
43.3(5)C18.497(1)4.184(3)302.1(2)
C28.473(2)4.173(5)299.6(4)
45.2(1)C18.479(1)4.174(3)300.1(2)
C28.460(2)4.166(5)298.2(4)
47.4(3)C18.457(1)4.164(3)297.8(3)
C28.440(2)4.159(6)296.3(4)
49.5(3)C18.441(1)4.160(4)296.4(3)
C28.427(3)4.156(6)295.1(4)
Back to TopTop