Next Article in Journal
Molecular Modeling of Ammonia Gas Adsorption onto the Kaolinite Surface with DFT Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Organically Templated Layered Uranyl Molybdate [C3H9NH+]4[(UO2)3(MoO4)5] Structurally Based on Mineral-Related Modular Units
Previous Article in Journal
Mineralogy and Geochemistry of Late Permian Coals within the Tongzi Coalfield in Guizhou Province, Southwest China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Crystal Chemistry of Chlormagaluminite, Mg4Al2(OH)12Cl2(H2O)2, a Natural Layered Double Hydroxide
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Minerals
Volume 10
Issue 1
10.3390/min10010045
minerals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of Zn-Saponite Using a Microwave Circulating Reflux Method under Atmospheric Pressure

by
Bing-Sheng Yu
1,*,
Wei-Hsiang Hung
1,
Jiann-Neng Fang
2 and
Yu-Ting Yu
3
1
Institute of Mineral Resources Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan
2
Department of Research, National Taiwan Museum, Taipei 10046, Taiwan
3
Geotechnical Engineering Department, Sinotech Engineering Consultants, Ltd., Taipei 10570, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2020, 10(1), 45; https://doi.org/10.3390/min10010045
Submission received: 30 October 2019 / Revised: 25 December 2019 / Accepted: 29 December 2019 / Published: 1 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Layered Minerals and Materials: Crystal Structures, Properties and Applications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

Smectite is a common clay mineral in nature. Due to its tendency to swell and its strong cation exchange capacity (CEC), smectite is prevalently used in industrial and technological applications. Numerous scholars have explored smectite synthesis, which usually involves autoclaving under high pressure. However, this approach requires an array of expensive equipment, and the process consumes time and energy. This study adopted self-developed equipment to synthesize zinc saponite (Zn-saponite), a type of trioctahedral smectite, using a microwave circulating reflux method under atmospheric pressure. Compared with the conventional hydrothermal methods, the proposed method entails fewer constraints regarding the synthesis environment and can be more easily applied to large-scale synthesis. The phase purity of the synthetic product was examined using X-ray diffraction and the CEC of the product was tested. The results revealed that the microwave circulating reflux method could synthesize Zn-saponite in 16 h under atmospheric pressure, and the CEC of the product reached 120 cmol(+)/kg. In addition, the product exhibited larger basal spacing and a 32% increase in CEC compared with Zn-saponite synthesized using a hot-plate under atmospheric pressure.

1. Introduction

Smectite is a clay mineral commonly found in nature and an essential ceramic material [1]. Due to its unique properties, smectite is prevalently used in various industries, including oil drilling, metallurgy, construction, chemical engineering, food manufacturing, aquaculture, and environmental engineering. However, its chemical composition, uneven microporous structure, and high concentration of impurities impede its use in high-level applications such as organo-modifications and catalytic reactions [2]. Although naturally formed smectite can undergo purification pretreatment, such processes are complex, expensive, and time-consuming, and result in environmental pollution. In addition, the resulting products contain impure phases. Synthetic smectite exhibits an even composition and structure, and its physical and chemical properties can be controlled during synthesis. Accordingly, numerous scholars have explored smectite synthesis [2,3,4,5].
According to its crystalline structure, smectite is categorized into trioctahedral smectite (including hectorite, saponite, and sauconite) and dioctahedral smectite (including montmorillonite, beidellite, and nontronite). Researchers have attempted to synthesize smectite of all types, but these synthesis processes have mostly been performed using hydrothermal methods under high temperatures. For example, saponite is typically synthesized under a hydrothermal condition of 5–17 MPa and 150–500 °C [6,7,8] by using specialized equipment. Conventional hydrothermal methods involve placing a reactor inside an autoclave, where the energy is transferred inward to the reactants. However, this synthesis process consumes considerable amounts of energy.
The development of microwave synthesis enables direct heating inside a reactor, which facilitates completing the reaction under a lower temperature and in a shorter time [9,10,11]. For example, Trujillano’s group successfully synthesized saponite and saponite-like materials by using microwave irradiation at 180 °C [11,12,13,14]. Vicente et al. [15] used the microwave hydrothermal method at 120 °C to synthesize hectorite in 8 h. The resulting product exhibited a cation exchange capacity (CEC) of 68 cmol(+)/kg, and the synthesis time was notably shorter than the 192-h reaction time required for conventional hydrothermal methods. Vicente et al. [16] also adopted the microwave hydrothermal method at 180 °C to synthesize saponite in 6 h. The product exhibited a CEC of 65 cmol(+)/kg.
Conventional hydrothermal methods entail using a specialized autoclave. Although microwave hydrothermal methods can reduce the reaction temperature and time, it also has certain drawbacks. Previous studies adopting such methods to synthesize smectite have used temperatures higher than 100 °C, and the reaction must also be conducted inside an autoclave. Such methods involve substantial equipment requirements and are difficult to apply in large-scale production. Therefore, developing alternative synthesis methods to produce smectite in large batches is imperative.
Of various alternative, nonhydrothermal methods (i.e., synthesis under the atmospheric pressure) have seen the most development [17]. Klopproge et al. [18] reported several cases of smectites synthesis below 100 °C. Vogels et al. [17] prepared saponites at 90 °C and 1 atmosphere over several hours. Prikhod’ko et al. [19] used a hot-plate under atmospheric pressure to synthesize saponite-like materials at 90 °C. Other researchers also synthesized Zn-saponite [20,21] and stevensite [22] under atmospheric pressure.
Scholars have used microwave hydrothermal methods to synthesize saponite in autoclaves or autoclave-like containers, but not under atmospheric pressure. In addition, no study has used microwave-assisted methods to synthesize saponite under atmospheric pressure. Therefore, this study developed a microwave circulating reflux method to produce Zn-saponite under atmospheric pressure. The phrase purity and CEC of the product are discussed herein.

2. Experimental Methods

For comparison, reagents used for synthesizing Zn-saponite were based on Prikhod’ko et al. [19]. Na1.2[Zn6](Si6.8Al1.2)·O20(OH)4·nH2O was used to prepare the precursor. The final precursor was a mixture of precursors A and B, where 1.1 L of final precursor was a mixture of 600 mL of precursor A and 500 mL of precursor B. For precursor A, an Al(OH)4 solution was prepared by dissolving 4.22 g of Al(NO3)3·9H2O (99%) in 28 mL of 2 M NaOH (99%). This solution was then added to another solution containing 30.0 g of Na2SiO3·9H2O (99%) in 75 cm3 of deionized water under vigorous stirring. The resulting gel was kept at room temperature for 1 h without stirring. Next, the gel was loaded into deionized water, to a volume of 600 mL, and mixed evenly. For precursor B, 500 mL of a separately prepared aqueous solution containing 32.60 g of Zn(NO3)2·6H2O (99%) and 0.80 mol of CO(NH2)2 (98%) in deionized water. According to Prikhod’ko et al. [19], urea can be used as a hydrolyzing agent because of its thermally initiated decomposition, which makes it possible to smoothly vary the pH of the reaction medium, and thus, its hydrolysis rate when forming the target material can be controlled. The two precursors (A and B) were evenly mixed to acquire the final precursor.
This study self-developed an atmospheric pressure microwave circulating reflux device (Figure 1) consisting of three microwave reaction chambers (with a total power of 100 w) and a reaction tube with a diameter of 1 cm. The initial precursor volume was set as 1 L and added in the flask. A peristaltic pump was used to transfer the precursor from the near bottom of the flask into the microwave device and then back to the flask. To prevent precipitation of saponite products, the pump was used to maintain a circulating flow at 1200 mL/min. Although there was a temperature maintenance device under the flask, the temperature in the flask was mainly maintained using the hot liquid refluxed by the microwave reaction. However, the residual temperature in the flask may have also promoted saponite formation. Therefore, in this study, a control experiment using only a hot plate was performed for comparison.
The temperature of the microwave device outlet was maintained at about 95 °C. After the reacting solution passed through the outlet, the solution temperature gradually decreased and remained at approximately 90 °C. The reaction times were set as 16 and 24 h. To achieve significantly different results, the experimental conditions were set to change considerably. Other synthesis processes were performed using the same microwave power but with half the precursor volume (0.5 L) and using the same precursor volume but with the microwave power reduced by half (total: 50 w). The resulting products were compared.
To synthesize the control sample, this study adopted the method used in Prikhod’ko et al. [19]; a hot-plate was used to synthesize smectite. In the control experiment, the reaction temperature of the precursor in the flask was set at 95 °C.
After the reaction was complete, the products were washed three times with water, separated centrifugally, and then, placed in a 70 °C oven. The dried product underwent X-ray diffraction (XRD) to verify its crystalline phase. XRD analysis of the synthesized samples was conducted using a D2-Phaser powder diffractometer (Bruker, Germany, Cu-Kα radiation), with 2θ of 5–70°, step size of 0.02°, and scanning rate of 3°/min. For the quantitative analysis of phase purity, part of each product was taken, added to 10% alumina powder as an internal standard, mixed well, and then, measured through XRD.
According to Yu and Liu [23], a software environment that combines a Profex graphical user interface with the software BGMN can handle models for structural disorder of smectites [24]; this software environment was thus selected for the Rietveld refinement quantitative phase analysis of the synthetic saponite samples. In addition, the mineralogical compositions of impurities were determined through the Rietveld refinement of the synthetic smectite products. The software simulated and calculated repeatedly until the content of alumina powder in the composition was close to 10% to obtain an accurate content of each phase. After the alumina content was deducted, the true content of each mineral phase in the original product was converted.
The method discussed by Bergaya and Vayer [25] was used to measure the CEC.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Crystalinity and Phase Purity

Some synthetic products were subjected to saponite confirmation experiments. In the ethylene glycol experiment, d(001) of the products expanded to approximately 1.82 nm, and when heated to 400 °C d(001) shrunk to approximately 0.98 nm. Furthermore, with CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide or hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide) intercalation, its d(001) could be increased to 1.92–2.03 nm. These experimental results suggested that the synthesized product belongs to the smectite mineral group.
Figure 2 displays the XRD pattern of the products obtained using the two methods. When the hot-plate method [19] was applied for 16 h, the crystalline phase of the product (Hot-plate-16) was slightly noticeable. The 2θ pattern displayed only three faint peaks at approximately 28°, 35°, and 60°. When the synthesis time was extended to 24 h, the XRD pattern of the product (Hot-plate-24) exhibited more noticeable diffraction peaks of Zn-saponite.
When the atmospheric pressure microwave reflex method was employed for 16 h (Microwave-16), the XRD pattern did not exhibit noticeable diffraction peaks. When the reaction time was extended to 24 h (Microwave-24), despite the appearance of Zn-saponite diffraction peaks, the peak intensity was lower than that of the product synthesized using the hot-plate (Figure 2).
The basal spacing (d001) of Hot-plate-24 was 1.298 nm at ambient humidity, slightly smaller than that of Microwave-24 (1.325 nm). All D-values of the (060) reflections were 0.1539 nm, suggesting that trioctahedral saponite was synthesized successfully [26,27].
After the addition of 10% alumina powder as an internal standard, phase purity analyses of the products were conducted for the two synthesis methods for 24 h on BGMN. The results revealed that the product synthesized using the hot-plate exhibited a phase purity of 97.3%. By contrast, the product synthesized using the microwave circulating reflux method only exhibited a phase purity of 45.0% (Table 1). In addition to saponite, the remaining constituents of the product were only amorphous, without other impurity phases.
The amount of the crystallized phase, determined through XRD pattern (Figure 2), and the calculated phase purity (Table 1) indicated that the crystalline quality of the products synthesized using the microwave circulating reflux method were inferior to the products synthesized using a hot-plate.
Although many studies have reported that microwave reactions can substantially reduce the synthesis time of a mineral or material, some studies have demonstrated that microwave radiation occasionally damages the crystalline structure of a synthetic mineral or material during synthesis. For example, Girnus et al. [28] noted that microwave radiation might destroy H-bridges, resulting in rapid gel dissolution and the formation of Al–O–P bonds during AlPO4 synthesis. During the synthesis of zinc oxide nanorods, Zhu et al. [29] discovered that a too high or too low working microwave power will destroy crystal structures. Zhang et al. [30] indicated that the crystalline structures of zeolite were destroyed when microwave power was above 480 W. Fan et al. [31] suggested that microwave heating tends to destroy the lamellar structure within starch granules before the disordering of the double helixes within amylopectin due to its rapid heating rate.
The microwave device used in this study had only three small chambers, each had a reaction space with a height of 10 cm and an inner diameter of 1 cm. The volume of the total reaction space was only 23.6 mL. This means that if the reactant volume is 1000 mL, the reactant only undergoes a microwave reaction for 2.36% of the entire reaction time. Consequently, despite the reaction time being 24 h, the precursor only underwent a microwave reaction for approximately 0.57 h because of the limited space in the reaction chambers. However, in this short period of time, the precursor is exposed to strong microwave radiation. The excessively strong energy emitted by the microwave device resulted in Zn-saponite having unfavorable phase purity and crystallinity.
To further explore the effect of microwave radiation on the crystalline structure of synthetic Zn-saponite, this study reduced either the precursor volume (Microwave-24-0.5V) or microwave power by half (Microwave-24-0.5E) and compared the obtained synthetic products. When the volume of the solution is halved, it circulates at a double rate, and thus its exposure time under microwave irradiation is double. If the supposition regarding the negative effect of overly strong microwave radiation on Zn-saponite crystallinity is valid, reducing the precursor volume by half would result in less crystalized products because the exposure time of precursor to microwave radiation was increased. This would also reduce the XRD peak intensity. By contrast, reducing the microwave power by half would reduce the energy of the microwave reaction, resulting in more crystalized products with stronger XRD peak intensities.
Figure 3 presents the XRD pattern of Microwave-24, Microwave-24-0.5V, and Microwave-24-0.5E. The results revealed that Microwave-24-0.5V, which was exposed to microwave radiation for the longest duration, exhibited the least noticeable peak in the basal plane (001), indicating unfavorable crystallinity. Additionally, this sample exhibited a slightly lower phase purity (43.9%) than did Microwave-24 (Table 1) and had an increased basal spacing of 1.383 nm.
The basal plane (001) peak of Microwave-24-0.5E was stronger than that of Microwave-24, indicating favorable crystallinity. This sample also exhibited slightly higher phase purity (50.2%) than did Microwave-24 and a slightly reduced basal spacing of 1.303 nm.
The aforementioned results verified that although the proposed device can be used to synthesize Zn-saponite in 24 h, during which the solid phase is exposed to microwave for only 0.57 h, the overly strong microwave energy produced by the device can damage the crystalline structure of the synthetic product, resulting in unfavorable phase purity and crystallinity.

3.2. Cation Exchange Capacity

The cation exchange capacity (CEC) of smectite is a critical property affecting its applicability. Under atmospheric pressure, this study used a hot-plate to heat the precursor for 16 and 24 h to synthesize smectite, resulting in CEC of 84 and 91 cmol(+)/kg, respectively (Table 2). When the microwave circulating reflux method was adopted to synthesize smectite under atmospheric pressure, the CEC of the product was higher than that synthesized using the hot-plate (Hot-plate-24) regardless of the reaction time, reaching 96 and 105 cmol(+)/kg, respectively. Reducing the microwave power or precursor volume by half also resulted in Zn-saponite (Microwave-24-0.5E and Microwave-24-0.5V) having a higher CEC, reaching 112 and 120 cmol(+)/kg, respectively.
The permanent layer charge of synthesized saponites according to their theoretical structural formulas was calculated to be 1.20 ζTOT(per O20(OH)4). Therefore, in this study, the highest CEC of pure saponite products could theoretically be 120 cmol(+)/kg. However, the saponite purity of the microwave-24–0.5-V sample was only 43.9%, and the measured CEC was 120 cmol(+)/kg. If the CEC of amorphous material on the product is ignored, the CEC of saponite in the product might be as high as 270 cmol(+)/kg—indicating that the CEC of the saponite product is not entirely due to the permanent layer charge, but that a large part of it might be from the surface charge origin.
Numerous scholars have reported that crystal defects can increase the CEC of a mineral. For example, Murray and Lyons [32] stated that the differences in the CEC of various clay minerals have been attributed to differences in the degree of crystallinity. Ormsby et al. [33] explored the exchange behavior of kaolines with various degrees of crystallinity and mentioned that the CEC was well correlated with the surface areas that were affected by changing from well crystallized to poorly crystallized kaolines. Peigneur et al. [34] asserted that broken bonds on the edges of montmorillonite crystals affect ion exchange behavior. Siantar and Millman [35] demonstrated that CEC could be correlated with the number of defects created in the zeolite structure.
The XRD results indicated that Zn-saponite synthesized using the microwave circulating reflux method exhibited weaker peaks than did that synthesized using the hot-plate method, indicating that it had unfavorable crystallinity. However, the proposed method could create synthetic products with higher CEC levels.

4. Conclusions

This study successfully adopted the microwave circulating reflux method at approximately 90 °C and under atmospheric pressure to synthesize Zn-saponite in 24 h. Compared with the product obtained using the hot-plate, Zn-saponite synthesized using the proposed method exhibited larger basal spacing, which can be conducive to subsequent property modification through intercalation. Although Zn-saponite synthesized using the proposed method exhibited unfavorable crystallinity, its CEC was increased by approximately 32% compared with that of the product from the hot-plate method, reaching 120 cmol(+)/kg. Compared with conventional hydrothermal methods, the microwave circulating reflux method has fewer constraints regarding the synthesis environment and can be easily applied in large-scale production. Therefore, it holds considerable potential for synthesizing smectite with high applicability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and Project administration, B.-S.Y.; Methodology, B.-S.Y. and J.-N.F.; Validation, W.-H.H.; Formal Analysis, W.-H.H.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, B.-S.Y. and Y.-T.Y.; Writing—Review and Editing, B.-S.Y., J.-N.F. and Y.-T.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China, grant number MOST-106-2116-M-027-003.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The sponsors had no role in the design, execution, interpretation, or writing of the study.

References

  1. Bergaya, F.; Lagaly, G. General introduction: Clays, clay minerals, and clay science. In Developments in Clay Science; Faïza, B., Benny, K.G.T., Gerhard, L., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  2. Vaccari, A. Clays and catalysis: A promising future. Appl. Clay Sci. 1999, 14, 161–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Thomas, J.M.; Theocharis, C.R. Perspectives in Catalysis; Blackwell Scientific: London, UK, 1992; 431p. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lambert, J.-F.; Chevelier, S.; Frank, R.; Barthomeuf, D. Al-Pillared saponites. Part 2.-NMR studies. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1994, 90, 675–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Golubeva, O.Y.; Gusarov, V.V. Layered silicates with a montmorillonite structure: Preparation and prospects for the use in polymer nanocomposites. Glass Phys. Chem. 2007, 33, 237–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Whitney, G. Hydrothermal reactivity of saponite. Clays Clay Miner. 1983, 31, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bisio, C.; Gatti, G.; Boccaleri, E.; Marchese, L.; Superti, G.B.; Pastore, H.O.; Thommes, M. Understanding physico-chemical properties of saponite synthetic clays. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2008, 107, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Costenaro, D.; Gatti, G.; Carniato, F.; Paul, G.; Bisio, C.; Marchese, L. The effect of synthesis gel dilution on the physico-chemical properties of acid saponite clays. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012, 162, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vicente, I.; Salagre, P.; Cesteros, Y. Preparation of pure hectorite using microwaves. Phys. Procedia. 2010, 8, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Trujillano, R.; Rico, E.; Vicente, M.A.; Rives, V.; Sobrados, I.; Sanz, J. Saponites containing divalent transition metal cations in octahedral positions—Exploration of synthesis possibilities using microwave radiation and NMR characterization. Appl. Clay Sci. 2015, 115, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Baron, F.; SC Pushparaj, S.; Fontaine, C.; V Sivaiah, M.; Decarreau, A.; Petit, S. Microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of Ni–Mg layered silicate clays. Curr. Miccowave Chem. 2016, 3, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Trujillano, R.; Rico, E.; Vicente, M.A.; Rives, V.; Bergaoui, L.; Ben Chaabene, S.; Ghorbel, A. Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Fe3+ Saponites. Characterization by X-Ray Diffraction and FT-IR Spectroscopy. Rev. Soc. Esp. Miner. 2009, 11, 189–190. [Google Scholar]
  13. Trujillano, R.; Rico, E.; Vicente, M.A.; Herrero, M.; Rives, V. Microwave radiation and mechanical grinding as new ways for preparation of saponite-like materials. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 48, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Trujillano, R.; Rico, E.; Vicente, M.A.; Rives, V.; Ciuffi, K.J.; Cestari, A.; Gil, A.; Korili, S.A. Rapid microwave-assisted synthesis of saponites and their use as oxidation catalysts. Appl. Clay Sci. 2011, 53, 326–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vicente, I.; Salagre, P.; Cesteros, Y.; Guirado, F.; Medina, F.; Sueiras, J.E. Fast microwave synthesis of hectorite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2009, 43, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vicente, I.; Salagre, P.; Cesteros, Y.; Medina, F.; Sueiras, J.E. Microwave-assisted synthesis of saponite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 48, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vogels, R.J.M.J.; Kerkhoffs, M.J.H.V.; Geus, J.W. Non-hydrothermal synthesis, characterisation and catalytic properties of saponite clays. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 1995, 91, 1153–1161. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kloprogge, J.T.; Komarneni, S.; Amonette, J.E. Synthesis of smectite clay minerals: A critical review. Clays Clay Miner. 1999, 47, 529–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Prikhod’ko, R.V.; Sychev, M.V.; Astrelin, I.M.; Erdmann, K.; Hensen, E.J.M.; Van Santen, R.A. Nonhydrothermal synthesis and properties of saponite-like materials. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2003, 76, 700–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vogels, R.J.M.J.; Kloprogge, J.T.; Geus, J.W. Synthesis and characterization of saponite clays. Am. Miner. 2005, 90, 931–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, C.; He, H.; Tao, Q.; Ji, S.; Li, S.; Ma, L.; Zhu, J. Metal occupancy and its influence on thermal stability of synthetic saponites. Appl. Clay Sci. 2017, 135, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Petit, S.; Righi, D.; Decarreau, A. Transformation of synthetic Zn-stevensite to Zn-talc induced by the Hofmann-Klemen effect. Clays Clay Miner. 2008, 56, 645–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yu, B.S.; Liu, Y.Y. Improvement in phase purity and yield of hydrothermally synthesized smectite using Taguchi method. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 161, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bergmann, J.; Friedel, P.; Kleeberg, R. BGMN—A new fundamental parameter based Rietveld program for laboratory X-ray sources, its use in quantitative analysis and structure investigations. CPD Newsl. 1998, 20, 5–8. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bergaya, F.; Vayer, M. CEC of clays: Measurement by adsorption of a copper ethylenediamine complex. Appl. Clay Sci. 1997, 12, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Grauby, O.; Petit, S.; Decarreau, A.; Baronnet, A. The beidellite–saponite series: An experimental approach. Eur. J. Miner. 1993, 5, 623–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pascua, C.S.; Ohnuma, M.; Matsushita, Y.; Tamura, K.; Yamada, H.; Cuadros, J.; Ye, J. Synthesis of monodisperse Zn-smectite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 48, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Girnus, I.; Jancke, K.; Vetter, R.; Richter-Mendau, J.; Caro, J. Large AlPO4-5 crystals by microwave heating. Zeolites 1995, 15, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhu, J.Y.; Zhang, J.X.; Zhou, H.F.; Qin, W.Q.; Chai, L.Y.; Hu, Y.H. Microwave-assisted synthesis and characterization of ZnO-nanorod arrays. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2009, 19, 1578–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, Y.; Zhong, S.; Zhang, M.; Lin, Y. Antibacterial activity of silver-loaded zeolite A prepared by a fast microwave-loading method. J. Mater. Sci. 2009, 44, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fan, D.; Wang, L.; Chen, W.; Ma, S.; Ma, W.; Liu, X.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H. Effect of microwave on lamellar parameters of rice starch through small-angle X-ray scattering. Food Hydrocoll. 2014, 35, 620–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Murray, H.H.; Lyons, S.C. Further correlations of kaolinite crystallinity with chemical and physical properties. Clays Clay Miner. 1960, 8, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ormsby, W.C.; Shartsis, J.M.; Woodside, K.H. Exchange behavior of kaolins of varying degrees of crystallinity. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1962, 45, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Peigneur, P.; Maes, A.; Cremers, A. Heterogeneity of charge density distribution in montmorillonite as inferred from cobalt adsorption. Clays Clay Miner. 1975, 23, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Siantar, D.P.; Millman, W.S. Structural defects and cation exchange capacity in dealuminated Y zeolites. Zeolites 1995, 15, 556–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Minerals 10 00045 g001
Figure 1. Atmospheric pressure microwave reflux device for Zn-saponite synthesis.
Figure 1. Atmospheric pressure microwave reflux device for Zn-saponite synthesis.
Minerals 10 00045 g001
Minerals 10 00045 g002
Figure 2. XRD pattern of products synthesized using a hot-plate under atmospheric pressure (a) and by using the microwave reflex method (b).
Figure 2. XRD pattern of products synthesized using a hot-plate under atmospheric pressure (a) and by using the microwave reflex method (b).
Minerals 10 00045 g002
Minerals 10 00045 g003
Figure 3. XRD pattern of Zn-saponite synthesized using the microwave circulating reflux method with different parameters.
Figure 3. XRD pattern of Zn-saponite synthesized using the microwave circulating reflux method with different parameters.
Minerals 10 00045 g003
Table 1. Phase purity and basal spacing of Zn-saponite synthesized using various methods.
Table 1. Phase purity and basal spacing of Zn-saponite synthesized using various methods.
Sample NumberPhase Purity (%)Basal Spacing (nm)d060 (nm)
Hot-plate-2497.31.298 ± 0.0030.1539 ± 0.0004
Microwave-2445.01.325 ± 0.0030.1539 ± 0.0004
Microwave-24-0.5E50.21.303 ± 0.0030.1538 ± 0.0004
Microwave-24-0.5V43.91.383 ± 0.0030.1539 ± 0.0004
Table 2. Cation exchange capacity (CEC) of Zn-saponite synthesized using various methods.
Table 2. Cation exchange capacity (CEC) of Zn-saponite synthesized using various methods.
Sample NumberReaction Time (h)CEC (cmol(+)/kg)
Hot-plate-161684
Hot-plate-242491
Microwave-161696
Microwave-2424105
Microwave-24-0.5E24112
Microwave-24-0.5V24120

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, B.-S.; Hung, W.-H.; Fang, J.-N.; Yu, Y.-T. Synthesis of Zn-Saponite Using a Microwave Circulating Reflux Method under Atmospheric Pressure. Minerals 2020, 10, 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10010045

AMA Style

Yu B-S, Hung W-H, Fang J-N, Yu Y-T. Synthesis of Zn-Saponite Using a Microwave Circulating Reflux Method under Atmospheric Pressure. Minerals. 2020; 10(1):45. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10010045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Bing-Sheng, Wei-Hsiang Hung, Jiann-Neng Fang, and Yu-Ting Yu. 2020. "Synthesis of Zn-Saponite Using a Microwave Circulating Reflux Method under Atmospheric Pressure" Minerals 10, no. 1: 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10010045

APA Style

Yu, B.-S., Hung, W.-H., Fang, J.-N., & Yu, Y.-T. (2020). Synthesis of Zn-Saponite Using a Microwave Circulating Reflux Method under Atmospheric Pressure. Minerals, 10(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10010045

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop