Next Article in Journal
Asymmetry in the Mean Free Path of Neutrinos in Hot Neutron Matter Under Strong Magnetic Fields
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Source Term from Part of the Boundary Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Construction of a Symmetrical Bi-Hydroxamate Metal–Organic Framework with Chemical Robustness

School of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2025, 17(6), 895; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17060895
Submission received: 22 March 2025 / Revised: 9 May 2025 / Accepted: 25 May 2025 / Published: 6 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Chemistry: Symmetry/Asymmetry)

Abstract

Recently, the emerging class of hydroxamate-based metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) has demonstrated significant structural diversity and chemical robustness, both essential for potential applications. Combining the favorable hard–hard Bi-O interactions and chelating chemistry of hydroxamate groups, a rigid and symmetrical three-dimensional bismuth-hydroxamate metal–organic framework was successfully prepared via solvothermal synthesis and structurally elucidated via X-ray crystallography. The MOF, namely SUM-91 (SUM = Sichuan University Materials), features one-dimensional Bi-oxo secondary building blocks (SBUs), which are bridged by chelating 1,4-benzenedihydroxamate linkers. With the demonstrated permanent porosity and molecular sieving effect (CO2 vs. N2), SUM-91 was also found to be stable under harsh chemical conditions (aqueous solutions with pH = 2–12 and various organic solvents). As the structural robustness of SUM-91 could be attributed to the finetuning of the coordinative sphere of Bi centers, this work shed light on the further development of (ultra-)microporous materials with high stability and selective adsorption properties.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), which have been around for a few decades now, are still constantly growing in terms of structural and chemical diversity as well as ranges of application [1,2]. Featuring tailorable chemical composition, topology, and porosity, MOFs have shown promising applications in gas storage and separation, heterogeneous catalysis, and many other energy- and environment-related fields [1,3,4,5]. For all avenues of material research and development, one common prerequisite for useful MOFs is stability. Therefore, the creation or modification of MOFs with elevated degrees of stability has been one of the central research questions in the community [6,7]. One traditional rule of thumb for obtaining stable MOFs is the “hard and soft acids and bases” (HSAB) principle from coordination chemistry. Therefore, for the majority of MOF ligands that have carboxylate groups, the “go-to” choice of metal would be one of the high valent ones (e.g., Zr/Hf/Cr) [8,9]. Another routinely used strategy for enhancing MOF stability is to increase the connectivity between individual building blocks within the crystal structure. This is applicable for primary building units (PBUs, a.k.a., standalone metal atoms) as well as secondary building units (SBUs) of different dimensionalities. One extreme example would be the incorporation of one-dimensional (1D) infinite SBUs, which connects with neighboring SBU chains at a large number of sites, increasing the overall structural stability as a result [9,10,11].
Recently, inspired by naturally occurring siderophores secreted by fungi and bacteria to capture FeIII from the environment, chelating hydroxamate groups have been successfully incorporated in MOF (or related material) chemistry, yielding a series of hydrolytically stable structures [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. In all these examples, hydroxamate chelators endowed the materials with exceptional chemical robustness. In fact, the power of hydroxamate group, as a hard base itself, could go well beyond the HSAB guidelines, manifesting in stable structures with softer acids (e.g., ZnII, CuI/II) [20,21,22]. Additionally, since hydroxamate-based linkers have similar bridging capabilities with carboxylate-based linkers, they are also compatible with 1D SBUs, again forming stable MOFs [23,24,25,26]. The category of hydroxamate-based MOFs has been reviewed [27], and it is clear that there is still a vast expanse of chemical diversity left underexplored, including bismuth-hydroxamate MOFs. Because of the low toxicity, abundance, and rich coordination chemistry of Bi, its incorporation in MOFs has certainly triggered research attention [28]. Concurrently, several bismuth-based hydroxamate complexes have been reported [29,30,31,32], highlighting their structural robustness under water.
Herein, we report the rational design and preparation of a Bi-hydroxamate MOF, taking advantage of the “hard-hard” interactions following the HSAB guidelines and the chelating hydroxamates. Particularly, as some conventional Bi-MOFs suffer from structural flexibility, which limits the exploration of their porosity, we propose that, when Bi centers are part of 1D SBUs in MOFs, the regularly distributed points of extension along the 1D SBU chains could be interconnected with robust chelating hydroxamate linkers. Learning from previously reported MOFs with 1D SBUs and high-valent metals, we were interested in studying the crystalline structure and properties of the product.

2. Materials and Methods

Dimethyl terephthalate (>98%), methanol (MeOH, 99.9%), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, >99%), sodium bicarbonate (>99%), hydroxylamine hydrochloride (>99%), sodium hydroxide (>99%), and Bi(NO3)3·5H2O (>99%) were purchased from Adamas Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and used without further treatment unless otherwise noted. Ultrapure water was obtained from a Millipak Express 40 system (Merk-Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany).

2.1. Synthesis of H4-BDHA

The synthesis of ligand 1,4-benzenedihydroxamic acid (H4-BDHA) was carried out according to the procedure reported in the literature [26]. A solution of hydroxylamine hydrochloride (12.6 g, 180 mmol) and sodium hydroxide (14.4 g, 360 mmol) in deionized water (90 mL) was added dropwise to a suspension of dimethyl terephthalate (11.6 g, 60 mmol) in methanol (100 mL). The mixture was stirred at 40 °C for 72 h, cooled to room temperature, and acidified to pH 5.5 using 5% HCl (~90 mL). The resulting white precipitate was collected by filtration, washed sequentially with deionized water (60 mL), saturated NaHCO3 solution (3 × 30 mL), and deionized water (2 × 30 mL), and then dried under vacuum overnight to yield H4-BDHA as a white solid. The identity and purity of the ligand were confirmed by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, shown in Figure S1 of the Supporting Information.

2.2. Synthesis of SUM-91

In total, 12.0 mg H4-BDHA and 7.3 mg Bi(NO3)3·5H2O were ultrasonically dissolved in 1.0 mL DMF and 1.0 mL MeOH in a 4 mL glass vial that was later tightly sealed. The mixture was heated in an isothermal oven at 100 °C for 12 h. Rod-shaped single crystals were then collected and washed with fresh DMF (3 × 1 mL). Yield: 4.6 mg (62%). The crystal structure was determined via single-crystal X-ray crystallography (CCDC deposition number 2432919) and named SUM-91 (SUM = Sichuan University Materials).

2.3. Activation of SUM-91

The as-synthesized SUM-91 crystals were subjected to a rigorous activation process to remove guest molecules for subsequent characterization. Initially, the crystals were washed with dry DMF (3 × 20 mL) to remove residual solvents, followed by repeated washing with acetone (6 × 20 mL) to exchange the high-boiling-point DMF for a more volatile solvent. The crystals were then dried in an oven at 80 °C for 6 h to remove the majority of the acetone. Finally, the material was activated under high vacuum (<10 Pa) at 100 °C for 12 h to completely evacuate the pores.

3. Results and Discussion

As described in Section 2.2, the solvothermal reaction between Bi(NO3)3·5H2O and 1,4-benzenedihydroxamic acid (H4-BDHA) in a mixed solvent system of DMF and MeOH (1:1, v/v) (Figure 1a) yielded rod-shaped single crystals (Figure 1b). Single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SC-XRD) revealed that SUM-91 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/n (CCDC deposition number 2432919, Table S1 of Supporting Information), with the asymmetric unit comprising two independent Bi3+ centers and two BDHA ligands (Figure S2 of Supporting Information). Overall, the formula of SUM-91 was determined to be Bi2(H2-BDHA)3, indicating that it is an electroneutral framework. Moreover, there was a presence of approx. an additional 273 electrons in the SUM-91 unit cell corresponding to free solvent molecules (e.g., 7 DMF molecules) in the cavities. The phase purity of SUM-91 was confirmed by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), comparing the experimental and simulated patterns (Figure 1c and Figure S3 of Supporting Information), with noticeable discrepancy in relative peak intensities at 2θ = 17.3°, indicating the presence of unequal distribution of different orientations for the crystallites.
One of the Bi3+ positions (denoted as Bi1 in the caption of Figure 1) is coordinated by seven oxygen atoms from three chelating hydroxamate groups and one bridging hydroxamate group (in monodentate mode) from four BDHA moieties. The other Bi3+ position (denoted as Bi2 in the caption of Figure 1) is coordinated by six oxygen atoms from two chelating and two bridging hydroxamate groups (in monodentate mode), again from four BDHA moieties. These two Bi3+ positions with distinct coordination environments alternate on the 1D SBU chain (Figure 1d). The coordination mode of the BDHA linker in SUM-91, while significantly differing from other reported BDHA-linked MOF structures featuring PBUs (e.g., MUV-11 [13], SUM-1 [17], SUM-9 [18], etc.), showed a certain degree of structural similarity to a couple of other examples featuring 1D SBUs and BDHA linkers [25,26]. The 1D chains are further interconnected by BDHA moieties to form a three-dimensional framework, with narrow triangular channels along the [100] direction (Figure 1e and Figure S4 of Supporting Information). On the sides of the 1D chains, multiple N–H···O hydrogen bonding interactions (d = 1.932 Å) are present between neighboring hydroxamate groups on BDHA moieties (Figure S7 of Supporting Information). From this angle, the cross-section of SUM-91 conforms to the two-dimensional hxl (hexagonal lattice) net, as shown in Figure 1f (also illustrated in Figure S8 as a rod-packing net). The structural features of 1D SBUs with regularly spaced points of extension and chelating hydroxamate linkers enable SUM-91 to inherit the stability that has been previously observed in hydroxamate-based MOFs [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,33], as evidenced by its thermogravimetric analysis profile (Figure 1g). We note that a thermal decomposition temperature of approx. 230 °C for SUM-91 is very close to previously reported entries of the same MOF category [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,33].
Traditionally, one major challenge that MOFs constantly face is maintaining the original crystalline structures in solvents differing from the synthetic mother liquor. Therefore, PXRD was used to study SUM-91’s crystallinity after soaking in aqueous solutions with varied pH values and a range of organic solvents. Experimental results confirmed that SUM-91 could completely maintain its structural integrity across a wide range of organic solvents (Figure 2a,b) and also in acidic and basic aqueous solutions (Figure 2c,d, pH ranging from 2 to 12).
To investigate the porosity of SUM-91, a Connolly representation (probe radius = 1.65 Å, corresponding to CO2) of the crystal structure was generated in Materials Studio 2020 first (Figure 3a). It was revealed that 1D channels run in the [100] direction of the SUM-91 unit cell, measuring approx. 3.40 Å across, closely matching a calculated pore size distribution plot (Figure 3b) produced by Zeo++ [34]. Next, N2 adsorption experiments that were conducted at 77 K revealed only negligible N2 uptake (<2 cm3 g−1) for SUM-91 after activation under high vacuum (<10 Pa) at 100 °C for 12 h (described in Section 2.3). In contrast to several previously reported Bi-based MOFs [35,36,37,38,39,40], which exhibited negligible gas adsorption (N2 or CO2), the CO2 sorption isotherms of SUM-91 exhibited a saturated uptake of 25 cm3 g−1 (Figure 3c), indicating an appreciable molecular sieving effect (over N2), even though the absolute uptake value was only moderate compared to benchmark MOF materials designed for CO2 sorbents (Table S2 of Supporting Information). Additionally, the CO2/N2 adsorptive behavior of SUM-91 also differed significantly from other BDHA-based MOFs (i.e., SUM-1 [17], SUM-9 [18]). We attributed the selective adsorption to the different kinetic diameters of N2 and CO2 molecules (3.64 Å vs. 3.30 Å) considering SUM-91’s narrow channels (vide supra), which would significantly restrict the diffusion of N2 molecules. Moreover, the 1D triangular channels are rich in -NH- groups, which could form N−H⋯O hydrogen bonds with the CO2 molecules, enhancing adsorption [41]. But, the narrow channels and small cavities in SUM-91 would ultimately limit the CO2 uptake in the materials when compared to benchmark CO2 sorbents (vide supra). After N2/CO2 sorption experiments, the SUM-91 sample remained highly crystalline, as revealed by PXRD, with a diffractogram aligning well with that of an as-synthesized sample (Figure 3d).

4. Conclusions

In this study, SUM-91, a novel bismuth-hydroxamate MOF with a rigid three-dimensional structure, has been successfully constructed. Single-crystal crystallography shows that SUM-91 is formed by interconnecting 1D infinite Bi-oxo SBU chains with linear bidentate hydroxamate linkers. These structural and chemical features endowed the MOF with marked thermal stability and particularly exceptional chemical robustness (crystallinity retention in aqueous solutions with pH 2–12). Moreover, the highly symmetrical and ultra-microporous triangular channels in SUM-91, which run along the [100] direction and measure approx. 3.40 Å in diameter, exhibited a significant molecular sieving effect for CO2 over N2. The rational design and successful preparation of the robust Bi-hydroxamate MOF have shed light on new directions for environmentally friendly yet chemically robust porous matrices.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/sym17060895/s1, Figure S1: 1H NMR spectrum of H4-BDHA in DMSO-d6; Figure S2: ORTEP diagram of the asymmetric unit of SUM-91 (50% probability factor for the thermal ellipsoids) generated via Olex2-1.5. Bi: black ellipsoids; C: gray ellipsoids; N: blue ellipsoids; O: red ellipsoids; H: white spheres; Figure S3: Comparison of simulated (green) and experimental (light purple) PXRD patterns of SUM-91; Figure S4: Crystal structure of SUM-91, viewed along the [100] direction; Figure S5: Crystal structure of SUM-91, viewed along the [010] direction; Figure S6: Crystal structure of SUM-91, viewed along the [001] direction; Figure S7: Illustration of the hydrogen bonding interactions between hydroxamate groups within SUM-91; Figure S8: Representation of the hxl rod-packing net of SUM-91; Figure S9: FT-IR spectrum of SUM-91; Figure S10: 1H NMR spectrum of the digested MOF (SUM-91); Table S1: Crystal data and structure refinement details for SUM-91; Table S2: Summary of CO2 adsorption properties of select MOFs. References [42,43,44,45,46,47] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.D., C.X. and C.L.; methodology, Y.D., C.X. and Z.-W.S.; formal analysis, Y.D., C.X. and Z.-W.S.; investigation, Y.D. and C.X.; data curation, C.X.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.D. and C.X.; writing—review and editing, C.X. and C.L.; visualization, C.X.; supervision, C.L.; project administration, C.L.; funding acquisition, C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 22176135 (C.L.). Additionally, this research was funded by the Continuous-Support Basic Scientific Research Project, grant number BJ030261224862 (C.L.).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Ejsmont, A.; Andreo, J.; Lanza, A.; Galarda, A.; Macreadie, L.; Wuttke, S.; Canossa, S.; Ploetz, E.; Goscianska, J. Applications of reticular diversity in metal–organic frameworks: An ever-evolving state of the art. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 430, 213655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Moosavi, S.M.; Nandy, A.; Jablonka, K.M.; Ongari, D.; Janet, J.P.; Boyd, P.G.; Lee, Y.; Smit, B.; Kulik, H.J. Understanding the diversity of the metal-organic framework ecosystem. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Martínez-Ahumada, E.; Díaz-Ramírez, M.L.; Velásquez-Hernández, M.d.J.; Jancik, V.; Ibarra, I.A. Capture of toxic gases in MOFs: SO2, H2S, NH3 and NOx. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 6772–6799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jeong, C.; Ansari, M.Z.; Hakeem Anwer, A.; Kim, S.-H.; Nasar, A.; Shoeb, M.; Mashkoor, F. A review on metal-organic frameworks for the removal of hazardous environmental contaminants. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 305, 122416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bobbitt, N.S.; Mendonca, M.L.; Howarth, A.J.; Islamoglu, T.; Hupp, J.T.; Farha, O.K.; Snurr, R.Q. Metal–organic frameworks for the removal of toxic industrial chemicals and chemical warfare agents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3357–3385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yang, D.; Gates, B.C. Catalysis by Metal Organic Frameworks: Perspective and Suggestions for Future Research. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 1779–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, J.; Goetjen, T.A.; Wang, Q.; Knapp, J.G.; Wasson, M.C.; Yang, Y.; Syed, Z.H.; Delferro, M.; Notestein, J.M.; Farha, O.K.; et al. MOF-enabled confinement and related effects for chemical catalyst presentation and utilization. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 1045–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Férey, G.; Mellot-Draznieks, C.; Serre, C.; Millange, F.; Dutour, J.; Surblé, S.; Margiolaki, I. A Chromium Terephthalate-Based Solid with Unusually Large Pore Volumes and Surface Area. Science 2005, 309, 2040–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cavka, J.H.; Jakobsen, S.; Olsbye, U.; Guillou, N.; Lamberti, C.; Bordiga, S.; Lillerud, K.P. A New Zirconium Inorganic Building Brick Forming Metal Organic Frameworks with Exceptional Stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13850–13851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rosi, N.L.; Kim, J.; Eddaoudi, M.; Chen, B.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Rod Packings and Metal-Organic Frameworks Constructed from Rod-Shaped Secondary Building Units. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1504–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. An, J.; Geib, S.J.; Rosi, N.L. Cation-Triggered Drug Release from a Porous Zinc-Adeninate Metal-Organic Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8376–8377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pereira, C.F.; Howarth, A.J.; Vermeulen, N.A.; Almeida Paz, F.A.; Tomé, J.P.C.; Hupp, J.T.; Farha, O.K. Towards hydroxamic acid linked zirconium metal–organic frameworks. Mater. Chem. Front. 2017, 1, 1194–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Padial, N.M.; Castells-Gil, J.; Almora-Barrios, N.; Romero-Angel, M.; da Silva, I.; Barawi, M.; García-Sánchez, A.; de la Peña O’Shea, V.A.; Martí-Gastaldo, C. Hydroxamate Titanium–Organic Frameworks and the Effect of Siderophore-Type Linkers over Their Photocatalytic Activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 13124–13133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chiong, J.A.; Zhu, J.; Bailey, J.B.; Kalaj, M.; Subramanian, R.H.; Xu, W.; Cohen, S.M.; Tezcan, F.A. An Exceptionally Stable Metal–Organic Framework Constructed from Chelate-Based Metal–Organic Polyhedra. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 6907–6912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lerma-Berlanga, B.; Castells-Gil, J.; Ganivet, C.R.; Almora-Barrios, N.; González-Platas, J.; Fabelo, O.; Padial, N.M.; Martí-Gastaldo, C. Permanent Porosity in Hydroxamate Titanium–Organic Polyhedra. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 21195–21199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhu, J.; Samperisi, L.; Kalaj, M.; Chiong, J.A.; Bailey, J.B.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, C.-J.; Sikma, R.E.; Zou, X.; Cohen, S.M.; et al. Metal-hydrogen-pi-bonded organic frameworks. Dalton Trans. 2022, 51, 1927–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lai, Q.; Chu, Z.-Q.; Xiao, X.; Dai, D.; Song, T.; Luo, T.-Y.; Tang, W.; Feng, X.; Zhang, Z.; Li, T.; et al. Two-dimensional Zr/Hf-hydroxamate metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 3601–3604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Feng, X.; Qin, Z.; Lai, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Shao, Z.-W.; Tang, W.; Wu, W.; Dai, Z.; Liu, C. Mixed-matrix membranes based on novel hydroxamate metal–organic frameworks with two-dimensional layers for CO2/N2 separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 305, 122476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shao, Z.-W.; Zhang, Z.; Kuang, Y.; Xiong, C.; Yang, J.; Wu, W.; Liu, Y.; Xiong, L.; Duan, X.; Liu, C. Bayesian Optimized Crystallization of a Hydroxamate-Functionalized Covalent Organic Framework for Enhanced Uranyl Uptake. Small 2025, 21, 2411788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sugamata, K.; Zhang, Y.; Amanokura, N.; Shirai, A.; Minoura, M. Alkoxy-Functionalized Hydroxamate/Zinc Metal–Organic Frameworks and the Effects of Substituents and Acid Addition on Their Structures. Inorg. Chem. 2024, 63, 2454–2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sugamata, K.; Takagi, C.; Awano, K.; Iihama, T.; Minoura, M. Structural analysis of and selective CO2 adsorption in mixed-ligand hydroxamate-based metal–organic frameworks. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 9948–9952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xiong, L.; Tang, W.; Xiong, C.; Du, J.; Zhang, Z.; Qiu, Y.; Shao, Z.-W.; Zhou, X.; Liu, C. Construction of robust Cu-MOFs from bifunctional pyridine-hydroxamate linkers for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Chem. Commun. 2025, 61, 4030–4033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yan, Y.; Zhang, N.-N.; Fuhrmann, D.; Merker, S.; Krautscheid, H. A stable lanthanum hydroxamate metal–organic framework with radical character and electrical conductivity. Dalton Trans. 2022, 51, 15946–15953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Feng, X.; Li, W.; Yang, L.; Song, T.; Xia, Z.; Lai, Q.; Zhou, X.; Xiao, H.; Liu, C. Ce-hydroxamate metal–organic frameworks for photocatalytic H2 generation. Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 13503–13506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zheng, Z.; Rong, Z.; Iu-Fan Chen, O.; Yaghi, O.M. Metal-Organic Frameworks with Rod Yttrium Secondary Building Units. Isr. J. Chem. 2023, 63, e202300017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xiong, C.; Shao, Z.-W.; Zhang, Z.; Dong, Y.; Xiong, L.; Qiu, Y.; Duan, X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, C. Charge-Tunable Bismuth-Hydroxamate Metal–Organic Frameworks for Photocatalytic Cr(VI) Mitigation. Cryst. Growth Des. 2024, 24, 8688–8694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sugamata, K. Hydroxamate-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem.—Eur. J. 2025, 31, e202403812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Z.; Zeng, Z.; Wang, H.; Zeng, G.; Xu, P.; Xiao, R.; Huang, D.; Chen, S.; He, Y.; Zhou, C.; et al. Bismuth-based metal–organic frameworks and their derivatives: Opportunities and challenges. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 439, 213902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Keogan, D.M.; Twamley, B.; Fitzgerald-Hughes, D.; Griffith, D.M. Novel class of Bi(iii) hydroxamato complexes: Synthesis, urease inhibitory activity and activity against H. pylori. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 11008–11014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Keogan, D.M.; Fagan, L.E.; Passos, T.M.; Müller-Bunz, H.; Quilty, B.; Griffith, D.M. Synthesis of polymeric bismuth chlorido hydroxamato complexes; X-ray crystal structure and antibacterial activity of a novel Bi(III) salicylhydroxamato complex. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2017, 460, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pathak, A.; Blair, V.L.; Ferrero, R.L.; Junk, P.C.; Tabor, R.F.; Andrews, P.C. Synthesis and structural characterisation of bismuth(iii) hydroxamates and their activity against Helicobacter pylori. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 16903–16913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pathak, A.; Blair, V.L.; Ferrero, R.L.; Mehring, M.; Andrews, P.C. Bismuth(iii) benzohydroxamates: Powerful anti-bacterial activity against Helicobacter pylori and hydrolysis to a unique Bi34 oxido-cluster [Bi34O22(BHA)22(H-BHA)14(DMSO)6]. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 15232–15234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Song, T.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Z.; Mei, Z.; Shao, Z.-W.; Liu, C. A Robust Zn-Hydroxamate Metal–Organic Framework Constructed from an Unsymmetrical Ligand for Iodine Capture. Symmetry 2024, 16, 1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Willems, T.F.; Rycroft, C.H.; Kazi, M.; Meza, J.C.; Haranczyk, M. Algorithms and tools for high-throughput geometry-based analysis of crystalline porous materials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012, 149, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Thirumurugan, A.; Tan, J.-C.; Cheetham, A.K. Heterometallic Inorganic-Organic Frameworks of Sodium−Bismuth Benzenedicarboxylates. Cryst. Growth Des. 2010, 10, 1736–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Burrows, A.D.; Jurcic, M.; Mahon, M.F.; Pierrat, S.; Roffe, G.W.; Windle, H.J.; Spencer, J. Bismuth coordination networks containing deferiprone: Synthesis, characterisation, stability and antibacterial activity. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 13814–13817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wibowo, A.C.; Smith, M.D.; zur Loye, H.-C. New 3D bismuth-oxo coordination polymers containing terephthalate-based ligands: Observation of Bi2O2-layer and Bi4O3-chain motifs. CrystEngComm 2011, 13, 426–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kan, L.; Li, J.; Luo, X.; Li, G.; Liu, Y. Three novel bismuth-based coordination polymers: Synthesis, structure and luminescent properties. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2017, 85, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, X.; Jiang, S.; Sun, L.X.; Xing, Y.H.; Bai, F.Y. Synthesis and structure of a 3D supramolecular layered Bi-MOF and its application in photocatalytic degradation of dyes. J. Mol. Struct. 2022, 1270, 133895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Thirumurugan, A.; Cheetham, A.K. Anionic Metal–Organic Frameworks of Bismuth Benzenedicarboxylates: Synthesis, Structure and Ligand-Sensitized Photoluminescence. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 2010, 3823–3828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xie, W.; Fu, Q.; Chen, G.; Yan, L.; Yang, L.; Yuan, X.; Wen, S.; Ge, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, X. Fast diffusion and high C2H2 capture in a 2D MOF with oxygen-riched wide channels for efficient C2H2/CO2 separation. Compos. Part B Eng. 2025, 299, 112414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. A 2008, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. C Struct. Chem. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bose, S.; Sengupta, D.; Rayder, T.M.; Wang, X.; Kirlikovali, K.O.; Sekizkardes, A.K.; Islamoglu, T.; Farha, O.K. Challenges and opportunities: Metal–organic frameworks for direct air capture. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2307478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mutyala, S.; Jonnalagadda, M.; Ibrahim, S.M. Effect of modification of UiO-66 for CO2 adsorption and separation of CO2/CH4. J. Mol. Struct. 2021, 1227, 129506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Neubertová, V.; Švorčík, V.; Kolská, Z. Amino-modified ZIF-8 for enhanced CO2 capture: Synthesis, characterization and performance evaluation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2024, 366, 112956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Synthesis of SUM-91. (b) Optical microscopic image of SUM-91 crystals. (c) Comparison of simulated (green) and experimental (light purple) PXRD patterns of SUM-91. (d) The Bi-oxo 1D SBU in SUM-91. Color code: Bi1, light purple spheres; Bi2, dark green spheres; C, gray spheres; N, blue spheres; O, red spheres; H, white spheres. (e) Crystal structure of SUM-91, viewed along the [100] direction. (f) Illustration of the hxl topology. (g) TGA profile (black) and heat flow curve (red) of SUM-91.
Figure 1. (a) Synthesis of SUM-91. (b) Optical microscopic image of SUM-91 crystals. (c) Comparison of simulated (green) and experimental (light purple) PXRD patterns of SUM-91. (d) The Bi-oxo 1D SBU in SUM-91. Color code: Bi1, light purple spheres; Bi2, dark green spheres; C, gray spheres; N, blue spheres; O, red spheres; H, white spheres. (e) Crystal structure of SUM-91, viewed along the [100] direction. (f) Illustration of the hxl topology. (g) TGA profile (black) and heat flow curve (red) of SUM-91.
Symmetry 17 00895 g001
Figure 2. PXRD patterns of SUM-91 crystals after 24 h of immersion in various (a) acidic/basic and (b) not-so-polar organic solvents. PXRD patterns of SUM-91 crystals after 24 h exposure to aqueous solutions of various pH values: (c) acidic to neutral and (d) neutral to basic.
Figure 2. PXRD patterns of SUM-91 crystals after 24 h of immersion in various (a) acidic/basic and (b) not-so-polar organic solvents. PXRD patterns of SUM-91 crystals after 24 h exposure to aqueous solutions of various pH values: (c) acidic to neutral and (d) neutral to basic.
Symmetry 17 00895 g002
Figure 3. (a) Connolly representation of a SUM-91 unit cell, viewed in the [100] direction. (b) Pore size distribution plot of SUM-91 as calculated by Zeo++. (c) CO2 adsorption–desorption isotherms at 273 K (adsorption: brown; desorption: green). (d) PXRD pattern of SUM-91 after N2/CO2 adsorption experiments (turquoise) compared to that of an as-synthesized sample (gray).
Figure 3. (a) Connolly representation of a SUM-91 unit cell, viewed in the [100] direction. (b) Pore size distribution plot of SUM-91 as calculated by Zeo++. (c) CO2 adsorption–desorption isotherms at 273 K (adsorption: brown; desorption: green). (d) PXRD pattern of SUM-91 after N2/CO2 adsorption experiments (turquoise) compared to that of an as-synthesized sample (gray).
Symmetry 17 00895 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dong, Y.; Xiong, C.; Shao, Z.-W.; Liu, C. Construction of a Symmetrical Bi-Hydroxamate Metal–Organic Framework with Chemical Robustness. Symmetry 2025, 17, 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17060895

AMA Style

Dong Y, Xiong C, Shao Z-W, Liu C. Construction of a Symmetrical Bi-Hydroxamate Metal–Organic Framework with Chemical Robustness. Symmetry. 2025; 17(6):895. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17060895

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dong, Yue, Chaozhi Xiong, Zhen-Wu Shao, and Chong Liu. 2025. "Construction of a Symmetrical Bi-Hydroxamate Metal–Organic Framework with Chemical Robustness" Symmetry 17, no. 6: 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17060895

APA Style

Dong, Y., Xiong, C., Shao, Z.-W., & Liu, C. (2025). Construction of a Symmetrical Bi-Hydroxamate Metal–Organic Framework with Chemical Robustness. Symmetry, 17(6), 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17060895

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop