Abstract
This paper is devoted to new propagation and regularity results for a class of first-order Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman-type problems in a separable infinite-dimensional Hilbert space. Specifically, the related Cauchy problem is investigated by employing the Faedo–Galerkin approximation method. Under some structural assumptions, the main result is obtained by using the probabilistic representation formula of the solution in order to define the weak continuity assumptions, by assuming the existence of a symmetric positive definite Hilbert–Schmidt operator and by employing modulus continuity arguments.
1. Introduction
The mathematical modeling of complex systems requires great attention considering that it usually is based on a system of nonlinear differential equations coupled to specific initial and/or boundary conditions. Different initial/boundary value problems can be defined depending on the form of the boundary conditions (Dirichlet, Neumann, Robin [,,]). The well-posedness of the initial/boundary value problem is at the core of the mathematical analysis; the existence and uniqueness of solutions and the continuous dependence on the initial data are usually called the Hadamard conditions [,]. However, from the mathematical analysis viewpoint, the regularization and the propagation of some properties are important areas that have been recently gained much attention, particularly in infinite-dimensional spaces, where the definition of some operators and operations needs to be highlighted. In this context, a general theory is missing, and some methods derived from nonlinear analysis have been proposed; see, among others, semigroup theory and stochastic analysis theory [,].
Mathematical problems based on Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman-type equations in infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces have been investigated in [,,]. A seminal paper on the study of the convexity of a Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman-based problem is []; viscosity solution theory in an infinite-dimensional space has been also proposed in [] and further developments have been investigated in [,]. Mild solutions based on stochastic representation formulas have recently attracted much attention []. Deep neural network approximations [] and the relationships with the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations [] have also been investigated. Viscosity solutions to the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations associated with sublinear Lévy-type processes have been studied in []. Readers interested in the numerical approximation of Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations is referred to [].
A particular Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman mathematical problem is based on the heat equation with the source term
where H denotes a real separable infinite-dimensional Hilbert space. Recently, problem (1) has been mathematically analyzed in order to gain some regularization and propagation properties [].
This paper aims at generalizing the investigations of the paper [] to the following nonlinear problem based on a Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman-type equation:
A specific example of (2) is defined by the following equation:
where is a linear, bounded, positive, self-adjoint, nuclear operator on H (or is a degenerate symmetric matrix such that ), and F a time-independent function called a Hamiltonian. Readers interested in some mathematical problems based on Equation (3) are referred to papers [,,] and the references cited therein.
This paper deals with the mathematical analysis of problem (2) by employing the Faedo–Galerkin approximation method consisting of introducing finite-dimensional approximations of Equation (2); see, among others, paper []. Moreover, the probabilistic representation formula of the solution is used in order to define the weak continuity assumptions []. The main technical assumptions are based on the existence of a symmetric positive definite Hilbert–Schmidt operator B and on the B-modulus continuity arguments [].
2. Background and Notations
In what follows, denotes a real separable Hilbert space and its generic point. According to the Faedo–Galerkin method (see []), the properties in the space H can be studied by means of the introduction of the vectorial space . Let be the orthogonal projection on and the orthogonal projection on the orthogonal space of . The spaces and are isomorphic spaces.
Let and be a real value function; and denote the first- and second-order Fréchet derivatives of with respect to the “space” variable , respectively.
Let be the set of symmetric matrices and A a symmetric matrix, e.g., . By definition, means that . The 2-norm of A is defined as follows:
and, in particular, if , one has
where denotes the largest eigenvalue of .
Let be an open set of H. The following functional spaces will be employed in the present paper:
- ;
- ;
- ;
- ;
- denotes the Hölder ()/Lipschitz () space, where k is a nonnegative integer referring to .In particular, , Dv is Lipschitz on .
Let B be a bounded linear operator in H and ; u is said to be B-continuous if whenever weakly in H and in H.
The notations and denote the norm convergence and the weak convergence of to x, respectively.
It is well known that
- is dense in (see [,]);
- If X is a finite-dimensional space, then the space , is dense in ;
- If X is a infinite-dimensional, on the contrary, the density of in fails to be true for (see []).
3. Main Assumptions and Statement of the Main Result
This section deals with the main result of the present paper, related to the following Cauchy problem based on the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman-type equation:
where H denotes a real separable infinite-dimensional Hilbert space.
A time-independent Hamiltonian F is taken into account. It is worth stressing that the notation instead of is employed to remark that u is a scalar function.
For convenience, a specific case of is considered, namely . Accordingly, the Cauchy problem (4) reads
where is a given measurable function belonging to .
The following problem is now discussed in order to clarify to the reader the method of the subsequent sections. The well-known Eikonal-type problem reads
In the original approach [,], the following approximated equation is considered:
for . The operator in (7) regularizes the Eikonal equation, known as the vanishing viscosity method. The aim is to let and to study the limit of the family .
Usually, is bounded and locally equicontinuous on . By using the Arzela–Ascoli theorem [], one deduces that
for some subsequence and some limit function .
It seems that u is a type of solution of (6); however, u is only continuous and no information about and is available. Moreover, (6) is fully nonlinear and does not have a divergence structure; thus, no integration by parts or weak convergence techniques can be employed in order to justify that u is a weak solution. Then, the maximum principle is used to obtain the notion of a weak solution (viscosity solution).
The partial differential equation of problem (6) shares a property with the heat equation. Indeed, straightforward computation shows that if is a smooth solution of the above equation, then the following Hopf–Cole transform []
satisfies the following linear heat problem:
If , by classical linear theory, the solution of (9) admits the following integral representation:
and, hence, for and , and by inverting the Hopf–Cole transform (since it is Lipschitz between and ), we obtain
which is solution of the quasilinear problem (6). Consequently, transformation (8) transforms the nonlinear Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman-type equations into linear evolution equations.
The mathematical analysis performed in the present paper requires the following structural assumptions on and f.
- (H1)
- There exists a symmetric positive definite Hilbert–Schmidt operator B such that (the adjoint operator of B) and we assume (a modulus of continuity) to be continuous, increasing and subadditive as on such that and
The following further assumption is introduced (first regime).
- (H2)
- There exists a modulus of continuity such that
The third assumption that we introduce is the following (second regime).
- (H3)
- The bounded linear operator B is such that
It may be useful to remark that hypothesis (16) is equivalent to (therefore, whether for u or for , the Cole–Hopf transformation leaves it invariant).
Bearing all of the above in mind, we deduce that, in particular, is bounded (however, is not , but we have and is bounded). We are in the second regime, i.e.,
is propagated; the second regime establishes that as soon as the verifies hypothesis (16) or (17), then
- -
- the Laplacian and have a meaning;
- -
- u satisfies the Lipschitz condition for positive times.
The third regime is rewritten as follows.
- (H4)
- The operator B is such that
On the other hand, we have
from which we deduce the term that interests us, i.e., , but we have an additional term, which is :
Accordingly, the last assumption and the third regime imply the second regime.
By adapting the argument, we deduce that hypothesis (18) entails hypothesis (16) and therefore is automatically bounded using the boundedness (18).
The following main result holds true.
Theorem 1.
Let be a sequence of increasing vector subspaces of dimension N that converges to H. Let be a solution of the following problem:
such that
where m is the modulus of continuity in t, namely . Then,
- (1)
- converges uniformly in on every bounded set of H to a function :The function u is such that
- (i)
- (ii)
- Since , we haveare uniformly continuous for the norm of H on a vector subspace , which is the image of H by B in H, which allows us to give a meaning to and defines
- (2)
- Moreover, if
- (3)
The proof of Theorem 1 follows in the arguments of the following sections.
4. Formal a Priori Estimations
This section investigates the viscosity solution method for the problem
Firstly, an a priori estimate is investigated. The investigations focus on the regularity and not on the existence and uniqueness of a viscosity solution result. Most of the necessary proofs are sketched in order to ensure that this part is self-contained.
The following further assumption is required.
- (H5)
- Assume that
- (i)
- F is B-continuous;
- (ii)
- and f are Lipschitzian bounded functions on H.
The following lemma holds true.
Lemma 1.
Le u be the solution of (28) that satisfies hypotheses (H5). Then,
- (i)
- The solution u is B-continuous on ;
- (ii)
- The following estimate holds
- (iii)
- If , then
- (iv)
- Furthermore,
- (v)
- Moreover, in general,
Proof of Lemma 1.
The probabilistic representation of the solution of (28) is given by
where denotes the expectation in the probability space and represents the H-valued Brownian motion. □
Differentiating (33) with respect to and using the analytical expression of the Gaussian density of , one has [,]
By differentiating (34) twice with respect to , one has
We know that is bounded; increases by in the direction as it is divided by t and it increases with . Likewise, the same is true for . Then, necessarily, we have that
Therefore, is dominated by
where
If belongs to , we can simply replace with C; then, we would not even have a singularity. Inequality (37) is a type of Gronwall inequality, but, as is summable, this is enough. We denote
where is unknown.
It is easy to observe that
The foregoing estimate is useful, since the left-hand side of (40) is dominated by
Since is a constant on , then
The easiest consequence of (44) is that, for every , we obtain
Thus, is less than 1 provided that we choose to be large enough and then (36) is satisfied.
We finally reach the conclusion that if , then the solution is .
We have proven that if and is bounded, then
and, in general,
Bearing all of the above in mind, the following estimation for on , with a fixed T, holds true.
Claim 1.
Let be a Lipschitzian bounded function on H. Then, for , a subsolution is such that
Proof of Claim 1.
To prove the integro-differential inequality, we consider a problem with eigenvalues and we consider two different cases: and .
• The case . On the one hand, the second term on the right-hand side of (49) is an integrable kernel; by placing it on the left-hand side, we have a jump operator that verifies the principle of the maximum up to the first eigenvalue and therefore there exists a solution.
On the other hand, note that the total mass of this kernel is equal to , which is the worst case that can be obtained over the whole interval , so that if , we are not sure whether we have crossed the first eigenvalue. This is equivalent to
To this end, we look for a supersolution in the form
In order to ensure that is a supersolution, we need to evaluate the second term of (49). Using (50), we thus find
With the change in variable , the right-hand side of (52) is
Replacing this in (49), this entails that
and, therefore, again, we do not obtain a global subsolution, but, for , we have a subsolution of the form .
• For , it suffices to note that, using the estimate (49), we have a bound that, after any time, does not explode (we are far from 0, and there is no more explosion), and, since the initial condition is not , we obtain . □
Subsolution of (28). We proceed by contradiction using an argument of the maximum principle. Without loss of generality, we assume that the density .
Then, for all K and t that are small enough, one has
provided that we choose t to be small enough. Therefore, for , we can assume that
which means that is a subsolution. Moreover, we wish to be sure that ; this is certainly the case provided that we choose t to be small enough, and we will examine the first time that it occurs with , if this first time exists.
Let be defined as follows:
Then, we must have
Since, for , we have less than , by definition of this first time, this entails that
Therefore,
On the one hand, with (57), we have the equality by definition of time, and, on the other hand, by (59), we have the strict inequality. Therefore,
However, we have chosen such that this is not possible, and we reach a contradiction. Then, the fact that it is a supersolution (even a strict one is not necessary) ensures that we cannot use . This simple argument justifies the desired result.
Obtaining a -bound. We start with as small as we wish, but this is our new clock. At this moment, we start with . We will write the equation satisfied by the second derivatives and use the the integration by parts formula to obtain a bound on the third derivative, which will bring us again to . More precisely, we have
Note that the term is bounded. The worst term in (61) is . According to the previous argument, we first remark that is dominated by
In other words, the fact that we have a first-order term in the PDE (28) implies that, when we estimate the nth derivatives, we have a formula like (62) for the nth derivative. Accordingly, we have the same order derivative on the right-hand side, and this explains why we can, at this time, propagate all of the bounds.
It is interesting to obtain the propagation properties of various -bounds which are not easy to realize. In fact, the difficulty lies in obtaining the PDE from , which is a “degenerate equation”, since is monotonically increasing on .
The most difficult aspect of the proof is to gain the propagation of the -bounds so that we can justify our a priori estimates. To proceed, we will prove the following claim.
Claim 2.
lead to
Proof of Claim 2.
A key point of the proof is to notice that there is no regularization in a high-dimensional space. First of all, we observe that
and inserting it into the PDE (28), bearing in mind that , leads to the following equation:
where we assume that is Lipschitzian bounded on H. The estimate (63) implies that v is Lipschitz and the fact that on H implies
Moreover, exploiting the fact that is bounded and that is dominated by a non-negative constant , if we are able to prove that
then we will have the a priori estimate that we need. Within this scope, as in a finite dimension, let us fix a point . Let be the eigenvector associated with the largest eigenvalue of the operator (recall that has a finite trace). The largest eigenvalue (in terms of the absolute value) of is positive or negative. Let us denote by the second derivative in the direction , which is assumed to be strictly positive for the sake of simplicity.
Let be a point of the maximum of , i.e., is a point of the maximum value of the quadratic form of the absolute value of the operator. This implies, in particular, that is also a maximum point of .
We will analyze a bound in . Roughly speaking, if we complete the orthonormal basis of eigenvectors , we know that , . The next step is to write the equation solved by . From (61), we have
where is bounded. At each point t, we take a maximum point and apply the maximum principle. At this point, the derivative of the maximum is the derivative at the point of the maximum and therefore we recover that
since and . The first derivative vanishes; the left-hand side of (69) is regular since we have assumed that was bounded and therefore we have only the term to estimate. This gives
Once we have the above estimate, we direct our attention to the second term on the right-hand side of (70). Note that are vectors and is a scalar so that the second term in (70) is the inner product of the form . Hence, we obtain
The new requirement of (71) is to look at the matrix and its first coordinate after having diagonalized the matrix . We can easily check that
implies
Accordingly, the estimation (66) leads to (73) in the direction . In other words, if one looks at the vector multiplied by the weight , one has
In particular, the bound established above yields
and, consequently, the left-hand side of (75) is dominated by
Summarizing the arguments of this subsection, we have proven the following result: an inequality that, in general, would be quadratic would eventually lead to explosions, where we cannot eliminate the explosions, thanks to the regularization of the heat equation, and this is enough to transform it into a Gronwall inequality and obtain a real a priori estimate.
5. Some Consequences and Further Results
This section deals with the existence of the viscosity subsolution of the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman-type equation (5). We consider a subsequence of increasing subspaces of dimension N and we consider the following problem:
where is a known regular function and D is the Fréchet derivative operator in H. Recall that we identify a point of with a point of that shares the same non-zero N-coordinates. The space H is restricted to supplemented by 0, with . We do not devise any growth hypothesis on F, but since F is Lipschitz, we do not see the behavior of F at infinity.
Note that all of the a priori formal estimates obtained previously are still true in H and are uniform. As a consequence, we deduce that, possibly at the cost of extracting a subsequence still labelled such that
we have the B-modulus of continuity on , the Lipschitz condition, and it satisfies the properties (46), (47), (48) and (49). The only property to prove is the passage to the limit. It is easy to pass to the limit in since we have compactness with ; the difficult term is the Laplacian. To this end, we will use viscosity solution approaches.
Theorem 2.
We recall the classical definition of the subsolution or supersolution (also called the lower and upper solutions).
A bounded, uniformly continuous function is called a viscosity subsolution of (78) if, for all functions such that has a local maximum at , then
A bounded, uniformly continuous function is called a viscosity supersolution of (78) if, for all functions such that has a local minimum at , then
A viscosity solution of (78) is a function that is both a viscosity subsolution and a supersolution [].
It remains to clarify the class of the function . It is also worth noting that the maxima and minima in the above definition can be assumed to be strict and global and, for bounded sub- and supersolutions, may be assumed to be bounded and uniformly continuous on or belong to . The additional requirement is
which ensures that the Laplacian is a continuous function and that . It is worth noting that the relation (81) is equivalent to the following one:
The property (82) is sufficient for our test function and gives the sense to the Laplacian. Theorem 2 establishes the existence of viscosity solutions of the problem (78).
It is worth stressing that the results obtained in the present paper can be applied to specific partial differential equations proposed in the literature and, in particular, to optimal control problems; see, among others, the paper [] and the references therein.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, C.B. and C.D.; Formal analysis, C.B. and C.D.; Investigation, C.B. and C.D.; Writing—original draft preparation, C.B. and C.D.; Writing—review and editing, C.B. and C.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Karimov, E.; Ruzhansky, M.; Tokmagambetov, N. Cauchy type problems for fractional differential equations. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2022, 33, 47–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boolakee, O.; Geier, M.; De Lorenzis, L. Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions for a lattice Boltzmann scheme for linear elastic solids on arbitrary domains. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2023, 415, 116225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmitt, K. Boundary value problems for quasilinear second order elliptic partial differential equations. Nonlinear Anal. 1978, 2, 263–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hadamard, J. Sur les Problèmes aux Dérivées Partielles et leur Signification Physique; Princeton University Bulletin: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1902. [Google Scholar]
- Strauss, W.A. Partial Differential Equations: An Introduction, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Da Prato, G.; Kwapien, S.; Zabczyk, J. Regularity of solutions of linear stochastic equations in Hilbert spaces. Stochastics 1987, 23, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da Prato, G.; Zabczyk, J. Smoothing properties of transition semigroups in Hilbert spaces. Stochastics Stochastics Rep. 1991, 35, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chow, P.L.; Menaldi, J.L. Infinite-dimensional Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations in Gauss-Sobolev spaces. Nonlinear Anal. Theory, Methods Appl. 1997, 29, 415–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masiero, F. Hamilton Jacobi Bellman equations in infinite dimensions with quadratic and superquadratic Hamiltonian. Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. 2012, 32, 223–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertucci, C.; Lasry, J.M.; Lions, P.L. A singular infinite dimensional Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation arising from a storage problem. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2210.02780. [Google Scholar]
- Barbu, V.; Da Prato, G. Global existence for the Hamilton-Jacobi equations in Hilbert space. Ann. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa-Classe di Sci. 1981, 8, 257–284. [Google Scholar]
- Crandall, M.G.; Lions, P.L. Hamilton-Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions I. Uniqueness of viscosity solutions. J. Funct. 1985, 62, 379–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lions, P.L. Equations Aux Dérivées Partielles: HJB, MFG et les Autres; Cours Collège de France: Paris, France, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Tataru, D. Viscosity solutions of hamilton-Jacobi equations with unbounded nonlinear terms. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1992, 163, 345–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fabbri, G.; Gozzi, F.; Swiech, A. Stochastic optimal control in infinite dimension. In Probability and Stochastic Modelling; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, G. Deep neural network approximations for the stable manifolds of the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.-D.; Liu, G. On the Navier-Stokes equations and the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation on the group of volume preserving diffeomorphisms. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2403.15997. [Google Scholar]
- Kühn, F. Viscosity solutions to Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations associated with sublinear Lévy(-type) processes. Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. 2019, 16, 531–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalise, D.; Kunisch, K.; Rao, Z. (Eds.) Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equations: Numerical Methods and Applications in Optimal Control; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Bianca, C.; Dogbe, C. Regularization and propagation in the heat equation for infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Nonlinear Stud. 2021, 28, 1287–1310. [Google Scholar]
- Barbu, V.; Da Prato, G. A note on a Hamilton-Jacobi equation in Hilbert space. Nonlinear Anal. 1985, 9, 1337–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cannarsa, P.; Da Prato, G. On a functional analysis approach to parabolic equations in infinite dimensions. J. Funct. Anal. 1993, 118, 22–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Cerrai, S. Second order PDE’s in finite and infinite dimension. In Lecture Notes in Mathematics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2001; Volume 1762. [Google Scholar]
- Swiech, A. “Unbounded” second order partial differential equations in infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Comm. Partial. Differ. Equations 1994, 19, 1999–2036. [Google Scholar]
- Crandall, M.G.; Lions, P.L. Hamilton-Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions. VI. Nonlinear-A and Tatarus method refined. In Evolution Equations, Control Theory, and Biomathematics (Han sur Lesse, (1991), Volume 155 of Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics; Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 1994; pp. 51–89. [Google Scholar]
- Breneis, S. On variation functions and their moduli of continuity. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2020, 491, 124349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lions, J.L. Quelques Méthodes de Résolution des Problèmes aux Limites Non Linéaires; Gauthier-Villars: Paris, France, 1969. [Google Scholar]
- Lasry, J.M.; Lions, P.L. A remark on regularization in Hilbert spaces. Israel J. Math. 1986, 55, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nemirovski, A.S.; Semenov, A.M. The polynomial approximation of functions on Hilbert space. Mat. Sb. 1973, 92, 257–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crandall, M.G.; Evans, L.C.; Lions, P.L. Some properties of viscosity solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi equations. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1984, 282, 487–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crandall, M.G.; Lions, P.L. Viscosity solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi equations. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1983, 277, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rudin, W. Principles of Mathematical Analysis; McGraw-Hill Book Co.: New York, NY, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Hopf, E. The partial differential equation ut + uux = μuxx. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 1950, 3, 201–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fournié, E.; Lasry, J.M.; Lebuchoux, J.; Lions, P.-L. Applications of Malliavin calculus to Monte-Carlo methods in finance. II. Finance Stoch. 2001, 5, 201–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henry-Labordère, P.; Tan, X.; Touzi, N. Unbiased simulation of stochastic differential equations. Ann. Appl. Probab. 2017, 27, 3305–3341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barles, G. An introduction to the theory of viscosity solutions for first-order Hamilton-Jacobi equations and applications. In Lecture Notes in Mathematics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; Volume 2074. [Google Scholar]
- Moon, J. Stochastic optimal control in infinite dimensions with state constraints. Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl. Int. Multidiscip. J. 2022, 223, 113050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).