Next Article in Journal
Regularity Index of Uncertain Random Graph
Previous Article in Journal
Periodic, Singular and Dark Solitons of a Generalized Geophysical KdV Equation by Using the Tanh-Coth Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
On Nonlinear Ψ-Caputo Fractional Integro Differential Equations Involving Non-Instantaneous Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Note on Modified Degenerate Changhee–Genocchi Polynomials of the Second Kind

by
Waseem Ahmad Khan
1,* and
Maryam Salem Alatawi
2
1
Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, P.O. Box 1664, Al Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2023, 15(1), 136; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15010136
Submission received: 21 October 2022 / Revised: 26 December 2022 / Accepted: 29 December 2022 / Published: 3 January 2023

Abstract

:
In this study, we introduce modified degenerate Changhee–Genocchi polynomials of the second kind, and analyze some properties by providing several relations and applications. We first attain diverse relations and formulas covering addition formulas, recurrence rules, implicit summation formulas, and relations with the earlier polynomials in the literature. By using their generating function, we derive some new relations, including the Stirling numbers of the first and second kinds. Moreover, we introduce modified higher-order degenerate Changhee–Genocchi polynomials of the second kind. We also derive some new identities and properties of this type of polynomials.

1. Introduction

Many researchers [1,2,3,4,5] defined and constructed generating maps for novel families of special polynomials, such as Bernoulli, Euler, and Genocchi by utilizing Changhee and Changhee–Genocchi polynomials. These studies provided fundamental properties and diverse applications for these polynomials. For instance, not only several explicit and implicit summation formulas, recurrence formulas, symmetric properties, and many correlations with the well-known polynomials in the literature have been derived intensely, but we also derived some beautiful correlations between some special polynomials. Additionally, the aforementioned polynomials allow for the derivation of utility properties in a quite basic procedure and assist in defining the novel families of special polynomials. By motivating the above, here, we introduce modified degenerate Changhee–Genocchi polynomials of the second kind, and analyze some properties by providing several relations and applications. We first attain diverse relations and formulas covering addition formulas, recurrence rules, implicit summation formulas, and relations with the earlier polynomials in the literature.
The ordinary Bernoulli, Euler and Genocchi polynomials are defined by (see [6,7,8]):
ω e ω 1 e ξ ω = υ = 0 B υ ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! ω < 2 π ,
2 e ω + 1 e ξ ω = υ = 0 E υ ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! ω < π ,
and
2 ω e ω + 1 e ξ ω = υ = 0 G υ ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! ω < π .
In the case when ξ = 0 , B υ = B υ ( 0 ) , E υ = E υ ( 0 ) and G υ = G υ ( 0 ) , ( υ N 0 ) are called the ordinary Bernoulli Euler and Genocchi numbers.
We note that
G 0 ( ξ ) = 0 , E υ ( ξ ) = G υ + 1 ( ξ ) υ + 1 ( υ 0 ) .
Stirling numbers of the first kind are given by (see [1,6,9,10,11,12,13]):
1 k ! ( log ( 1 + ω ) ) k = υ = k S 1 ( υ , k ) ω υ υ ! ( k 0 ) .
Stirling numbers of the second kind are given by (see [2,3,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]):
1 k ! ( e ω 1 ) k = υ = k S 2 ( υ , k ) ω υ υ ! ( k 0 ) .
The Daehee polynomials are defined by (see [18]):
log ( 1 + ω ) ω ( 1 + ω ) ξ = υ = 0 D υ ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
When ξ = 0 , D υ = D υ ( 0 ) are called the Daehee numbers. We find that
D υ = ( 1 ) υ υ ! υ + 1 ( υ N 0 ) .
The first few are
D 0 = 1 , D 1 = 1 2 , D 2 = 2 3 , D 3 = 3 2 , .
The Changhee polynomials are defined by (see [14]):
2 2 + ω ( 1 + ω ) ξ = υ = 0 C h υ ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
When ξ = 0 , C h υ = C h υ ( 0 ) , ( υ N 0 ) are called the Changhee numbers.
Changhee–Genocchi polynomials are defined via generating function (see [10])
2 log ( 1 + ω ) 2 + ω ( 1 + ω ) ξ = υ = 0 C G υ ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
When ξ = 0 , C G υ = C G υ ( 0 ) are called the Changhee–Genocchi numbers.
Recently, Kim et al. [16] introduced modified Changhee–Genocchi polynomials defined by
2 ω 2 + ω ( 1 + ω ) ξ = υ = 0 C G υ * ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
When ξ = 0 , C G υ * = C G υ * ( 0 ) are called the modified Changhee–Genocchi numbers.
The Bernoulli numbers of the second kind are defined by (see [11]):
ω log ( 1 + ω ) = υ = 0 b υ ω υ υ ! ( υ N 0 ) .
Via (10), we see that
ω log ( 1 + ω ) r ( 1 + ω ) ξ 1 = υ = 0 B υ ( υ r + 1 ) ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! ,
where B υ ( r ) ( ξ ) are the higher-order Bernoulli polynomials defined by
ω e ω 1 r e ξ ω = υ = 0 B υ ( r ) ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
For ξ = 1 and r = 1 in (11) and (12), we obtain
b υ = B υ ( υ ) ( 1 ) .
The degenerate Changhee–Genocchi polynomials are defined by (see [15]):
2 λ log 1 + 1 λ log ( 1 + λ ω ) 2 λ + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 + 1 λ log ( 1 + λ ω ) ξ = υ = 0 C G υ , λ ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
Via (8) and (13), we see that
lim λ 0 C G υ , λ ( ξ ) = C G υ ( ξ ) ( υ 0 ) .
The modified degenerate Changhee–Genocchi polynomials are defined by (see [10]):
2 λ ω 2 λ + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 + 1 λ log ( 1 + λ ω ) ξ = υ = 0 C G υ , λ * ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
From (9) and (14), we have
lim λ 0 C G υ , λ * ( ξ ) = C G υ * ( ξ ) ( υ 0 ) .
Replacing ω by 1 λ ( e λ ω 1 ) in (13), we obtain
2 log ( 1 + ω ) 2 + ω ( 1 + ω ) ξ = σ = 0 C G σ , λ ( ξ ) λ σ 1 σ ! ( e λ ω 1 ) σ = σ = 0 C G σ , λ λ σ υ = σ S 2 ( υ , σ ) λ υ ω υ υ ! = υ = 0 σ = 0 υ C G σ , λ λ υ σ S 2 ( υ , σ ) ω υ υ ! .
Thus, from (8) and (15), we obtain
C G υ ( ξ ) = σ = 0 υ C G σ , λ λ υ σ S 2 ( υ , σ ) ( υ 0 ) .
The degenerate Changhee polynomials (or λ -Changhee polynomials) are defined by (see [19]):
2 λ 2 λ + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 + 1 λ log ( 1 + λ ω ) ξ = υ = 0 C h υ , λ ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
When ξ = 0 , C h υ , λ = C h υ , λ ( 0 ) , ( υ N 0 ) are called the degenerate Changhee numbers.
The higher-order partially degenerate Changhee–Genocchi polynomials are defined by (see [17]):
2 log ( 1 + ω ) 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ k 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ξ = υ = 0 C G υ , λ ( k ) ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
When ξ = 0 , C G υ , λ ( k ) = C G υ , λ ( k ) ( 0 ) are called the higher-order partially degenerate Changhee–Genocchi numbers.
Inspired by the works of Kim and Kim [10,17], in this paper, we define modified degenerate Changhee–Genocchi numbers and polynomials of the second kind, investigate some new properties of these numbers and polynomials, and derive some new identities and relations between the modified degenerate Changhee–Genocchi numbers and polynomials of the second kind. We also derive higher-order modified degenerate Changhee–Genocchi polynomials and construct relations between some beautiful special polynomials and numbers.

2. Modified Degenerate Changhee–Genocchi Polynomials of the Second Kind

In this section, we introduce modified degenerate Changhee–Genocchi polynomials of the second kind, and investigate some explicit expressions for degenerate Changhee–Genocchi polynomials and numbers of the second kind. We begin with the following definition.
For λ R , we consider the modified degenerate Changhee–Genocchi polynomials of the second kind, defined by means of the following generating function:
2 log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ξ = υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
At point ξ = 0 , C G υ , λ * = C G υ , λ * ( 0 ) , ( υ N 0 ) are called the modified degenerate Changhee–Genocchi numbers of the second kind. Here, the function log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ is called the degenerate function of ω .
We note that
υ = 0 lim λ 0 C G υ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! = lim λ 0 2 log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ξ = 2 ω 2 + ω ( 1 + ω ) ξ = υ = 0 C G υ * ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
From (19) and (20), we have
lim λ 0 C G υ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) = C G υ * ( ξ ) ( υ 0 ) .
Theorem 1.
For υ 0 , we have
C G υ * ( ξ ) = σ = 0 υ C G σ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) λ υ σ S 2 ( υ , σ ) .
Proof. 
Replacing ω by 1 λ ( e λ ω 1 ) in (19) and using (5), we obtain
2 ω 2 + ω ( 1 + ω ) ξ = σ = 0 C G σ , λ * ( ξ ) λ σ 1 σ ! ( e λ ω 1 ) m = σ = 0 C G σ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) λ σ υ = σ S 2 ( υ , σ ) λ υ ω υ υ ! = υ = 0 σ = 0 υ C G σ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) λ υ σ S 2 ( υ , σ ) ω υ υ ! .
Therefore, via (22), we obtain the result.  □
Theorem 2.
For υ 0 , we have
C G υ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) = σ = 0 υ C G σ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) S 1 ( υ , σ ) λ υ σ .
Proof. 
By using (4) and (19), we see that
2 log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ξ = σ = 0 C G σ , λ * ( ξ ) 1 σ ! 1 λ log ( 1 + λ ω ) σ = σ = 0 C G σ , λ * ( ξ ) υ = σ S 1 ( υ , σ ) λ υ σ ω υ υ ! = υ = 0 σ = 0 υ C G σ , λ * ( ξ ) S 1 ( υ , σ ) λ υ σ ω υ υ ! .
Therefore, via (19) and (24), we obtain the result.  □
Theorem 3.
For υ 0 , we have
C G υ , λ * ( ξ ) = σ = 0 υ ρ = 0 σ υ σ ( ξ ) ρ λ σ ρ S 1 ( σ , ρ ) C G υ σ , λ * .
Proof. 
Through (4) and (19), we obtain
υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! = 2 log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ξ = υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 * ω υ υ ! σ = 0 ξ σ log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ σ = υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 * ω υ υ ! σ = 0 ( ξ ) σ 1 σ ! λ σ ( log ( 1 + λ ω ) ) σ = υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 * ω υ υ ! σ = 0 ( ξ ) σ λ σ σ = ρ S 1 ( σ , ρ ) λ σ ω σ σ ! = υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 * ω υ υ ! σ = 0 ρ = 0 σ ( ξ ) ρ λ σ ρ S 1 ( σ , ρ ) ω σ σ ! = υ = 0 σ = 0 υ ρ = 0 σ υ σ ( ξ ) ρ λ σ ρ S 1 ( σ , ρ ) C G υ σ , λ , 2 * ω υ υ ! .
Therefore, via (19) and (27), we obtain at the required result.  □
Theorem 4.
For υ 0 , we have
C G υ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) = σ = 0 υ C G σ * ( ξ ) λ υ σ S 1 ( υ , σ ) .
Proof. 
Replacing ω by log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ in (9) and applying (4), we obtain
2 log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ω ξ = σ = 0 C G σ * ( ξ ) 1 σ ! ( log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) σ = σ = 0 C G σ * ( ξ ) λ υ σ υ = σ S 1 ( υ , σ ) ω υ υ ! = υ = 0 σ = 0 υ C G σ * ( ξ ) λ υ σ S 1 ( υ , σ ) ω υ υ ! .
By using (19) and (28), we acquire at the desired result.  □
Theorem 5.
For υ 0 , we have
C G υ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) = σ = 0 υ υ σ C G υ σ , λ ( ξ ) D σ λ σ .
Proof. 
From (14) and (19), we note that
υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! = 2 log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ξ = 2 ω 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ξ log ( 1 + λ ω ) λ ω = υ = 0 C G υ , λ * ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! σ = 0 D σ λ σ ω σ σ ! = υ = 0 σ = 0 υ υ σ C G υ σ , λ * ( ξ ) D σ λ σ ω υ υ ! .
Therefore, via (19) and (30), we obtain the result.  □
Theorem 6.
For υ 0 , we have
G υ ( ξ ) = r = 0 υ l = 0 r σ = 0 l υ r C G σ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) λ l σ S 2 ( l , σ ) S 2 ( r , l ) B υ r .
Proof. 
Replacing ω by e ω 1 in (22) and using Equation (1), we obtain
2 ( e ω 1 ) e ω + 1 e ξ ω = l = 0 σ = 0 l C G σ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) λ l σ S 2 ( l , σ ) 1 l ! ( e ω 1 ) l 2 ω e ω + 1 e ξ ω = ω e ω 1 r = 0 l = 0 r σ = 0 l C G σ , λ * ( ξ ) λ l σ S 2 ( l , σ ) S 2 ( r , l ) ω r r ! = υ = 0 r = 0 υ l = 0 r σ = 0 l υ r C G σ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) λ l σ S 2 ( l , σ ) S 2 ( r , l ) B υ r ω υ υ ! .
Through (3) and (32), we obtain the result.  □
Theorem 7.
For υ 0 , we have
C G υ * ( ξ ) = l = 0 υ σ = 0 l C G σ , λ * ( ξ ) S 1 ( l , σ ) λ υ σ S 2 ( υ , l ) .
Proof. 
Replacing ω by 1 λ ( e λ ω 1 ) in (24), we obtain
2 ω 2 + ω ( 1 + ω ) ξ = l = 0 σ = 0 l C G σ , λ * ( ξ ) S 1 ( l , σ ) λ l σ λ l 1 l ! ( e λ ω 1 ) l = l = 0 σ = 0 l C G σ , λ * ( ξ ) S 1 ( l , σ ) λ l σ λ l υ = l S 2 ( υ , l ) λ υ ω υ υ ! = υ = 0 l = 0 υ σ = 0 l C G σ , λ * ( ξ ) S 1 ( l , m ) λ υ σ S 2 ( υ , l ) ω υ υ ! .
Therefore, via (9) and (28), we obtain the result.  □
Theorem 8.
For υ 0 , we have
C G υ , λ * ( ξ ) = l = 0 υ υ l b υ l λ υ l C G l , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) ,
where b υ are called the Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind (see Equation (10)).
Proof. 
Using (14) and (19), we have
υ = 0 C G υ , λ * ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! = 2 ω 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ξ = λ ω log ( 1 + λ ω ) 2 log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ξ = υ = 0 b υ λ υ ω υ υ ! l = 0 C G l , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) ω l l ! = υ = 0 b υ λ υ ω υ υ ! l = 0 C G l , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) ω l l ! = υ = 0 l = 0 υ υ l b υ l λ υ l C G l , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
Via (19) and (36), we obtain the result.  □
Theorem 9.
For υ 0 , we have
2 D υ λ υ = C G υ + 1 , λ * 2 υ + 1 + σ = 0 υ υ σ D σ λ σ C G υ σ , λ , 2 * .
Proof. 
From (19), we have
2 log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ = ( 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ω = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 * ω υ υ ! 2 υ = 0 D υ λ υ ω υ υ ! = 2 υ = 1 C G υ + 1 , λ , 2 * 1 υ + 1 ω υ υ ! + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ω υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 * ω υ υ ! 2 υ = 1 D υ λ υ ω υ υ ! = 2 υ = 1 C G υ + 1 , λ , 2 * 1 υ + 1 ω υ υ ! + υ = 1 σ = 0 υ υ σ D σ λ σ C G υ σ , λ , 2 * ω υ υ ! .
Via (38), we obtain (37).  □
Theorem 10.
For υ 0 , we have
C G υ , λ ( ξ ) = ρ = 0 υ σ = 0 ρ υ ρ ( 1 ) σ σ + 1 λ ρ σ 1 σ ! S 1 ( ρ , σ ) C G υ ρ , λ * ( ξ ) .
Proof. 
From (4) and (19), we have
υ = 0 C G υ , λ ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! = 2 log ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ξ = 2 log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ξ log ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ = υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! 1 log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ σ = 1 ( 1 ) σ 1 σ λ σ ( log ( 1 + λ ω ) ) σ = υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! σ = 1 ( 1 ) σ 1 σ λ σ ( log ( 1 + λ ω ) ) σ 1 = υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! σ = 0 ( 1 ) σ σ + 1 λ σ 1 σ ! ( log ( 1 + λ ω ) ) σ σ ! = υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! σ = 0 ( 1 ) σ σ + 1 λ σ 1 σ ! k = σ S 1 ( k , σ ) λ k ω k k ! = υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! k = 0 σ = 0 k ( 1 ) σ σ + 1 λ k σ 1 σ ! S 1 ( k , σ ) ω k k ! = υ = 0 k = 0 υ σ = 0 k υ k ( 1 ) σ σ + 1 λ k σ 1 σ ! S 1 ( k , σ ) C G υ k , λ , 2 * ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
Therefore, via (40), we obtain the result.  □
Theorem 11.
For υ 0 , we have
C G υ , λ ( ξ ) = σ = 0 υ S 1 ( υ , σ ) λ υ σ C G σ ( ξ ) .
Proof. 
Replacing ω by log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ in (8), we obtain
2 log ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ξ = σ = 0 C G σ , λ ( ξ ) ( log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) σ σ ! = σ = 0 C G σ , λ ( ξ ) λ σ υ = σ S 1 ( υ , σ ) λ υ ω υ υ ! = υ = 0 σ = 0 υ S 1 ( υ , σ ) λ υ σ C G σ , λ ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
On the other hand,
2 log ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ξ = υ = 0 C G υ , λ ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
Through (42) and (43), we obtain (41).  □
Here, we consider the higher-order modified degenerate Changhee–Genocchi polynomials by the following definition.
Let r N ; we consider the higher-order modified degenerate Changhee–Genocchi polynomials of the second kind given by the following generating function:
2 log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ r ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ξ = υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 ( * , r ) ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
When ξ = 0 , C G υ , λ , 2 ( * , r ) = C G υ , λ , 2 ( * , r ) ( 0 ) are called the higher-order modified degenerate Changhee–Genocchi numbers of the second kind.
lim λ 0 C G υ , λ , 2 ( * , r ) ( ξ ) = C G υ ( * , r ) ( ξ ) ( υ 0 ) ,
are called the higher-order modified Changhee–Genocchi polynomials.
Theorem 12.
For υ 0 , we have
C G υ , λ , 2 ( * , r ) ( ξ ) = σ = 0 υ υ σ λ σ D σ ( r ) C G υ σ , λ ( * , r ) ( ξ ) .
Proof. 
From (6), (14) and (44), we note that
υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 ( * , r ) ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! = log ( 1 + λ ω ) λ ω r 2 ω 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ r ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ξ = σ = 0 D σ ( r ) λ σ ω σ σ ! υ = 0 C G υ , λ ( * , r ) ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! = υ = 0 σ = 0 υ υ σ λ σ D σ ( r ) C G υ σ , λ ( * , r ) ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
Therefore, via (44) and (46), we obtain the result.  □
Theorem 13.
For υ 0 , we have
C G υ , λ , 2 ( * , r ) ( ξ ) = σ = 0 υ υ σ S 1 ( σ + r , r ) λ σ σ + r r C G υ σ , λ ( * , r ) ( ξ ) .
Proof. 
From (44), we note that
υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 ( * , r ) ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! = log ( 1 + λ ω ) λ ω r 2 ω 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ r ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ξ = σ = 0 S 1 ( σ + r , r ) λ σ σ + r r ω σ σ ! υ = 0 C G υ , λ ( * , r ) ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! = υ = 0 σ = 0 υ υ σ S 1 ( σ + r , r ) λ σ σ + r r C G n m , λ ( * , r ) ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
Therefore, via (44) and (48), we obtain the result.  □
Theorem 14.
For υ 0 , we have
C G υ , λ , 2 ( * , r ) ( ξ ) = l = 0 υ σ = 0 l υ l l σ S 1 ( σ + r , r ) λ σ σ + r r B l σ ( l r + 1 ) ( 1 ) C G υ l , λ ^ ( ξ ) .
Proof. 
From (18) and (44), we note that
υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 ( * , r ) ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! = 2 log ( 1 + ω ) 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ r ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ξ log ( 1 + λ ω ) λ ω r ω log ( 1 + ω ) r = υ = 0 C G υ , λ ^ ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! σ = 0 S 1 ( σ + r , r ) λ σ σ + r r ω σ σ ! l = 0 B l ( l r + 1 ) ( 1 ) ω l l ! = υ = 0 C G υ , λ ^ ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! l = 0 m = 0 l l m S 1 ( m + r , r ) λ m m + r r B l σ ( l r + 1 ) ( 1 ) ω l l ! = υ = 0 l = 0 υ σ = 0 l υ l l σ S 1 ( σ + r , r ) λ σ σ + r r B l σ ( l r + 1 ) ( 1 ) C G υ l , λ ^ ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
Therefore, via (44) and (50), we obtain the result.  □
Theorem 15.
For r , k N , with r > k and υ 0 , we have
C G υ , λ , 2 ( * , r ) ( ξ ) = l = 0 υ υ l C G l , λ , 2 ( * , r k ) C G n l , λ , 2 ( * , k ) ( ξ ) .
Proof. 
Through (44), we see that
2 log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ r ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ξ = 2 log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ r k 2 log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ k ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ξ = l = 0 C G l , λ , 2 ( * , r k ) ω l l ! σ = 0 C G σ , λ , 2 ( * , k ) ( ξ ) ω σ σ ! = υ = 0 l = 0 υ υ l C G l , λ , 2 ( * , r k ) C G n l , λ , 2 ( * , k ) ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! .
Therefore, via (44) and (52), we obtain the result.  □
Theorem 16.
For υ 0 , we have
C G υ , λ , 2 ( * , r ) ( ξ + η ) = k = 0 υ σ = 0 k υ k C G υ k , λ , 2 ( * , r ) ( ξ ) ( η ) σ λ k σ S 1 ( k , σ ) .
Proof. 
Now, we observe that
υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 ( * , r ) ( ξ + η ) ω υ υ ! = 2 log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ r ( 1 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ ) ξ + η = l = 0 C G l , λ , 2 ( * , r ) ( ξ ) ω l l ! σ = 0 ( η ) σ λ σ ( log ( 1 + λ ω ) ) σ σ ! = υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 ( * , r ) ( ξ ) ω υ υ ! k = 0 σ = 0 k ( η ) σ λ k σ S 1 ( k , σ ) ω k k ! = υ = 0 k = 0 υ σ = 0 k υ k C G υ k , λ , 2 ( * , r ) ( ξ ) ( η ) σ λ k σ S 1 ( k , σ ) ω υ υ ! .
coefficients of ω υ on both sides, we obtain the result.  □
Theorem 17.
For υ 0 , we have
C G υ , λ , 2 ( * , r ) = σ = 0 υ υ σ C G υ σ , λ , 2 ( * , r ) b σ ( r ) λ σ .
Proof. 
By using of (14) and (44), we have
2 ω 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ r = λ ω log ( 1 + λ ω ) r υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 ( * , r ) ω υ υ ! = σ = 0 b σ ( r ) λ σ ω σ σ ! υ = 0 C G υ , λ , 2 ( * , r ) ω υ υ ! = υ = 0 σ = 0 υ υ σ C G υ σ , λ , 2 ( * , r ) b σ ( r ) λ σ ω υ υ ! .
On the other hand,
2 ω 2 + log ( 1 + λ ω ) 1 λ r = υ = 0 C G υ , λ ( * , r ) ω υ υ ! .
Therefore, via (56) and (57), we obtain the result.  □

3. Conclusions

In the present paper, we introduced modified degenerate Changhee–Genocchi polynomials of the second kind, and analyzed some properties and relations by using the generating function. We also acquired several properties and formulas covering addition formulas, recurrence relations, implicit summation formulas, and relations with the earlier polynomials in the literature. Moreover, we derived the higher-order degenerate Changhee–Genocchi polynomials of the second kind, and constructed relations between some special polynomials and numbers. In addition, for advancing the purpose of this article, we will proceed with this idea in several directions in our next research studies.

Author Contributions

Writing-original draft, W.A.K.; Writing-review & editing, M.S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

There is no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alatawi, M.S.; Khan, W.A. New type of degenerate Changhee-Genocchi polynomials. Axioms 2022, 11, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Khan, W.A.; Alatawi, M.S. Analytical properties of degenerate Genocchi polynomials the second kind and some of their applications. Symmetry 2022, 14, 1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sharma, S.K.; Khan, W.A.; Araci, S.; Ahmed, S.S. New type of degenerate Daehee polynomials of the second kind. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 2020, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Khan, W.A. A note on q-analogue of degenerate Catalan numbers associated with p-adic integral on Z p . Symmetry 2022, 14, 1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khan, W.A. A study on q-analogue of degenerate 1 2 -Changhee numbers and polynomials. South East Asian Math. Math. Sci. 2022, 18, 71–82. [Google Scholar]
  6. Khan, W.A.; Haroon, H. Some symmetric identities for the generalized Bernoulli, Euler and Genocchi polynomials associated with Hermite polynomials. SpringerPlus 2016, 5, 1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Khan, W.A.; Alatawi, M.S.; Duran, U. A note on degenerate Catalan-Daehee numbers and polynomials. Symmetry 2022, 14, 2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Khan, W.A.; Younis, J.; Duran, U.; Iqbal, A. The higher-order type 2 Daehee polynomials associated with p-adic integral on Z p . Appl. Math. Sci. Eng. 2022, 30, 573–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Khan, W.A.; Nisar, K.S.; Duran, U.; Acikgoz, M.; Araci, S. Multifarious implicit summation formulae of Hermite-based poly-Daehee polynomials. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 2018, 12, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, B.M.; Jang, L.-C.; Kim, W.; Kwon, H.I. Degenerate Changhee-Genocchi numbers and polynomials. J. Ineq. Appl. 2017, 2017, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T. Higher-order Bernoulli and poly-Bernoulli mixed type polynomials. Georgian Math. J. 2015, 22, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khan, W.A.; Kamarujjama, D. Construction of partially degenerate Bell-Bernoulli polynomials of the first kind and their certain properties. Analysis 2022, 42, 171–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Khan, W.A.; Haroon, H. Higher order degenerate Hermite-Bernoulli polynomials arising from p-adic integrals on Z p . Iran. J. Math. Sci. Inform. 2022, 17, 171–189. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T.; Seo, J. A note on Changhee polynomials and numbers. Adv. Stud. Theor. Phys. 2013, 7, 993–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kwon, H.-I.; Kim, T.; Park, J.W. A note on degenerate Changhee-Genocchi polynomials and numbers. Glob. J. Pure Appl. Mat. 2016, 12, 4057–4064. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim, B.-M.; Jeong, J.; Rim, S.-H. Some explicit identities on Changhee-Genocchi polynomials and numbers. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2016, 2016, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kim, Y.; Kwon, J.; Sohn, G.; Lee, J.G. Some identities of the partially degenerate Changhee-Genocchi polynomials and numbers. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. 2019, 29, 537–550. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T. Daehee numbers and polynomials. Appl. Math. Sci. 2013, 120, 5969–5976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Seo, J.J.; Kwon, H.I. Differential equations associated with λ-Changhee polynomials. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2016, 9, 3098–3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Pathan, M.A.; Khan, W.A. On a class of generalized Humbert-Hermite polynomials via generalized Fibonacci polynomials. Turk. J. Math. 2022, 46, 929–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khan, W.A.; Alatawi, M.S. A Note on Modified Degenerate Changhee–Genocchi Polynomials of the Second Kind. Symmetry 2023, 15, 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15010136

AMA Style

Khan WA, Alatawi MS. A Note on Modified Degenerate Changhee–Genocchi Polynomials of the Second Kind. Symmetry. 2023; 15(1):136. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15010136

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khan, Waseem Ahmad, and Maryam Salem Alatawi. 2023. "A Note on Modified Degenerate Changhee–Genocchi Polynomials of the Second Kind" Symmetry 15, no. 1: 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15010136

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop