Abstract
Let be a simple undirected graph with finite vertex set and edge set . A total -labeling is called a total edge irregular labeling on if for any two different edges and in the numbers and are distinct. The smallest positive integer n such that can be labeled by a total edge irregular labeling is called the total edge irregularity strength of the graph . In this paper, we provide the total edge irregularity strength of some asymmetric graphs and some symmetric graphs, namely generalized arithmetic staircase graphs and generalized double-staircase graphs, as the generalized forms of some existing staircase graphs. Moreover, we give the construction of the corresponding total edge irregular labelings.
1. Introduction
Graph theory has been developed widely in both theory and application (see [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]). According to [8], regarding the application side, graph theory plays a vital role as it is at the foundations, for instance, of the internet, parallel computing, distributed computing, molecular topology, dynamics, energy, electricity, and electronic circuit design. Among many subjects in graph theory, labeling is one that is also continuing to develop for both undirected and directed graphs (see [9,10,11,12,13,14]). In addition, labeling itself is also playing an important role in many fields, such as coding theory, physics, astronomy, circuit design, and computer science (see [15]). One from various labelings mentioned in [9] is that which is called total edge irregular labeling, introduced by Bača et al. [16]. Given a simple connected undirected graph (later written as “a graph” for simplification) with non-empty finite vertex set and edge set . A labeling on graph is a function from the graph elements into some sets that are usually consisting of numbers. When the codomain of the labeling is the set , then the labeling is called n-labeling on . Furthermore, if the domain of the n-labeling is the set ( or ), then is called a vertex (edge or total, respectively) n-labeling. A total -labeling is called a total edge irregular labeling on if for any two different edges and in the numbers and are distinct. For any edge , the number is considered as the weight of edge under labeling and denoted by . The total edge irregularity strength of graph , denoted by , is defined as the smallest number n such that we can label by an edge irregular total n-labeling. Bača et al. [16] gave a hint on the lower bound of the total edge irregularity strength of an arbitrary graph, that is, for any graph , is always greater or equal to where is the maximum vertex degree of . Thus, to obtain the exact value of the total edge irregularity strength of graph , it is sufficient to show that the upper bound of is equal to the lower bound. This can be done by showing that there exists a total edge irregular n-labeling with . In [16], moreover, the authors found the edge irregularity strength of some families of graphs, including path and cycle graphs. For tree, the total edge irregularity strength was given by Ivančo and Jendrol [17], and complete graphs and complete bipartite graphs were given by Jendrol et al. [18]. For some other graphs, the result on the total edge irregularity strength can be found in [19] for generalized Petersen graphs, in [20] for copies of the generalized Petersen graphs, in [21] for the strong product of two paths, in [22] for some large graphs, in [23] for hexagonal girth graphs, in [24] for some series parallel graphs, in [25] for some cartesian products of graphs, in [26] for generalized prism graphs, in [27] for some cactus chain graphs, in [28] for accordion graphs, and in [29] for the disjoint union of sun graphs.
In [30], the author presented the total edge irregularity strength of some staircase graphs. Later, the staircase graphs were modified arithmetically into some odd and even staircase graphs and their total edge irregularity strength were given in [31]. In this paper, we introduce the generalization of the graphs investigated in [30,31] into some generalized arithmetic staircase graphs and generalized arithmetic double-staircase graphs. This generalization is aimed to give a more general setting of staircase graphs containing the existing concept of staircase graphs. Therefore, we obtain a wider scope of the graph class. In this paper, we also give the total edge irregularity strength of these graphs. For each of the graphs, we construct the corresponding total edge irregular labelings.
2. Results
In this section, we introduce the definition of the generalized arithmetic staircase graph, which is a non-symmetric graph, and the generalized arithmetic double-staircase graph, which is a symmetric graph. Moreover, we determine the exact value of the total edge irregularity strength of the graphs by constructing the corresponding total edge irregular n-labelings where n meets the lower bound of the graphs. We also give some examples of the graphs and some labeled ones.
2.1. Generalized Arithmetic Staircase Graph
The first graph we study is the generalized arithmetic staircase graph which is defined as follows.
Definition 1.
Given three arbitrary positive integers . The generalized arithmetic staircase graph of level n with a initial grids and difference b is a graph with vertex set
and edge set
Clearly, the in general is not symmetric. The maximum degree of is or for and is for . Moreover, it is a routine that Therefore,
The graph is isomorphic to the staircase graph [30]. The graphs and are isomorphic to the odd staircase graph and the even staircase graph , respectively [31]. Moreover, from [31], we know that for and for any positive number . Now, as an example, we give a visual representation of for and , as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Generalized arithmetic staircase graph .
Before we give the exact value of for arbitrary positive numbers such that , first we give the following lemmas.
Lemma 1.
For any positive integers and , we have
Proof.
It is sufficient to show that there is a total l-labeling with that gives different weights for the edges. Before we give the labeling, we determine the biggest positive number such that
Now, we give the labeling, namely
defined in the following way.
- (i)
- CaseThe vertex and edge labels are given as follows
vertex and edge label i and j - (ii)
- CaseThe vertex labels are
and the edge labels arevertex label i and j edge label , . From the labeling , it is easy to check that the weights of ’s edges constitute numbers from 3 up to . Thus, we complete the proof.
□
Lemma 2.
For arbitrary positive integers and , we have
Proof.
Just like the previous lemma, we first fix a positive integer satisfying
And further, to prove the assertion sufficiently, we construct a total labeling
defined in the following way:
- (i)
- CaseThe vertex and edge labels are
vertex and edge label i and j . - (ii)
- CaseWe label the vertices as follows
and for the edges, we give labels in the following wayvertex label i and j
with .edge label , Based on the definition of the labeling , the edge weights of vary from 3 up to .
□
From the above two lemmas, then we derive the following theorem on the total edge irregularity strength of any generalized arithmetic staircase graphs .
Theorem 1.
For arbitrary positive integers and , it follows that
Proof.
It is already clear that Hence, it is sufficient to show that there is a total edge irregularity l-labeling on with . Prior, it is necessary to determine the largest positive integer s such that
As an example, we give several integers s for various and n in Table 1.
Table 1.
Largest s for several values of , and n satisfying .
Then, we construct a function
defined in the following manner:
- (i)
- CaseThe vertex and edge labels are
vertex and edge label i and j - (ii)
- CaseThe vertices are labeled in the following way
and the edge labels are as followsvertex label i and j
withedge label , With respect to the labeling , the weights of ’s edges are varying from 3 up to .
□
As an example of the labeling for the graph given in Theorem 1, we give an example of the labeled graph , as shown in Figure 2. The vertex labels are given inside the circles while the edge labels are given in blue. For the graph , the corresponding value of s is equal to 2.
Figure 2.
Generalized arithmetic staircase graph with its total edge irregular 17-labeling.
2.2. Generalized Arithmetic Double-Staircase Graph
For the second observation, we give the definition of generalized arithmetic double-staircase graph as the following.
Definition 2.
Given three arbitrary positive integers . The generalized arithmetic double-staircase graph of level n with a initial grids and difference b is a graph with vertex set
with
and edge set consisting of edges given as the following
whenever a is odd and the following edges
whenever a is even.
| edge | i and j |
| . | |
| edge | i and j |
By the definition, it is obvious that the graph is a symmetric graph in the sense that it has a symmetric form. As examples, in Figure 3 and Figure 4, we give the graphs for and for , respectively.
Figure 3.
Generalized arithmetic double-staircase graph .
Figure 4.
Generalized arithmetic double-staircase graph .
The maximum degree of is obviously or for and is for . Furthermore, it is easy to see that
if a is odd and
if a is even. Hence, clearly the lower bound of is given as follows
Particularly, the graphs and are obviously isomorphic to the double-staircase graph and the mirror staircase , respectively, as presented in [30]. Moreover, the graphs and are isomorphic to the double odd staircase graph and mirror odd staircase graph , respectively, given in [31]. It has been shown in [30,31] that for each graph from those four types of staircase graphs, their total edge irregularity strengths are precisely equal to the lower bound given in [16]. In Theorem 2, we will prove that the same result also holds for arbitrary positive numbers with .
Before we proof Theorem 2, we give several lemmas below.
Lemma 3.
For arbitrary positive integers and , it follows that
Proof.
First, we determine the largest positive integer satisfying
We then define a total p-labeling with
in the following manner. The labeling is defined as the following.
- (i)
- CaseThe labels of the vertices and the edges are
vertex and edge label i and j - (ii)
- CaseThe vertex labels are
vertex label i and j . The edge labels are
with . With respect to the labeling , it is easy to see that all edges in have different weights.edge label
□
Lemma 4.
For arbitrary positive numbers and , it follows that
Proof.
We will show that the upper bound of meets the lower bound. We first determine the biggest positive integer satisfying
Let us construct -labeling with as follows
with labels for the vertices, and the edges are defined in the following way:
- (i)
- CaseFor a odd, the vertices and the edges are labeled in the following manner:
vertex and edge label i and j For a even, the labels of the vertices and the edges arevertex and edge label i and j - (ii)
- CaseFor a odd, the vertex labels are
vertex label i and j For a even, the vertex labels arevertex label i and j For a odd, the edge labels are as follows
with .edge label For a even, the edge labels are
with .edge label
It is easy to seet that all edge weights of , with respect to , are different numbers. Thus, the proof is complete. □
From the Lemmas 3 and 4, we then have Theorem 2 on total edge irregularity strength of the graph .
Theorem 2.
For arbitrary and , it follows that
Proof.
Again, we only need to show that the upper bound of meets the lower bound. For this, we will construct -labeling with so that all edge weights are different and constitute numbers from 3 up to . Now, we first find the largest positive integer t satisfying
Table 2.
Largest t for several values of , and n satisfying .
We define a total p-labeling with as follows
Labels for the vertices and the edges are defined as follows
- (i)
- CaseFor a odd, the vertex and edge labels are
vertex and edge label i and j For a even, the labels of the vertices and edges arevertex and edge label i and j - (ii)
- CaseFor a odd, the vertices are labeled as the following
vertex label i and j For a even, the vertex labels are given as followsvertex label i and j For a odd, the edge labels are as follows
with .edge label For a even, the edge labels are
with .edge label
Under the labeling , all edges in have different weights and the proof is complete. □
In order to make clear the construction of the labeling given in Theorem 2, we give the following examples of total edge irregular labeling on and , as given in Figure 5 and Figure 6. The labels of the vertices are as shown inside the circles, and the labels of the edges are given in blue. For the graphs and , the corresponding values of t are 2 and 1, respectively.
Figure 5.
Generalized arithmetic double-staircase graph and its total edge irregular 11-labeling.
Figure 6.
Generalized arithmetic double-staircase graph and its total edge irregular 12-labeling.
3. Conclusions
From the previous section, we have that the total edge irregularity strength of the generalized arithmetic staircase graph for any positive integers with is . In addition, the total edge irregularity strength of the generalized arithmetic double-staircase graph for arbitrary with is equal to = . From [30,31], we have that is equal to for and for any positive integer and is equal to for any positive numbers with and for any positive integer . Therefore, we conclude that for all positive integers , it follows that and =
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Y.S. and S.W.; methodology, A.S. and S.S.; validation, A.S. and S.S.; formal analysis, Y.S. and I.E.; investigation, Y.S., A.S. and S.S.; resources, S.W.; data curation, I.E.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.S.; writing—review and editing, S.W. and I.E.; visualization, Y.S.; supervision, S.W.; project administration, Y.S.; funding acquisition, S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research is funded by the Department of Mathematics Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Universitas Gadjah Mada, Grant Number 296/J01.1.28/PL.06.02/2022.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all reviewers for the valuable comments and suggestion.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Juan, J.S.-T.; Chen, Y.-C.; Lin, C.-H.; Chen, S.-C. Efficient Approaches to the Mixture Distance Problem. Algorithms 2020, 13, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cherkashin, D.; Kulikov, A.; Raigorodskii, A. On the Chromatic Numbers of Small-Dimensional Euclidean Spaces. Discret. Appl. Math. 2018, 243, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jäntschi, L. The Eigenproblem Translated for Alignment of Molecules. Symmetry 2019, 11, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bobu, A.V.; Kupriyanov, A.É.; Raigorodskii, A.M. A Generalization of Kneser Graphs. Math. Notes 2020, 107, 392–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jordán, C.; Murillo-Arcila, M.; Torregrosa, J.R. The STEM Methodology and Graph Theory: Some Practical Examples. Mathematics 2021, 9, 3110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Werner, F. Graph-Theoretic Problems and Their New Applications. Mathematics 2020, 8, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angelini, P.; Eades, P.; Hong, S.-H.; Klein, K.; Kobourov, S.; Liotta, G.; Navarra, A.; Tappini, A. Graph Planarity by Replacing Cliques with Paths. Algorithms 2020, 13, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomescu, M.A.; Jäntschi, L.; Rotaru, D.I. Figures of Graph Partitioning by Counting, Sequence and Layer Matrices. Mathematics 2021, 9, 1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gallian, J.A. A Dynamic Survey of Graph Labelling. Electron. J. Comb. 2021, 1, DS6. [Google Scholar]
- Su, J.; Wang, H.; Yao, B. Matching-Type Image-Labelings of Trees. Mathematics 2021, 9, 1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marr, A.; Simanjuntak, R. D-Magic Oriented Graph. Symmetry 2021, 13, 2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nada, S.; Elrokh, A.; Elsakhawi, E.A.; Sabra, D.E. The Corona between Cycles and Paths. J. Egypt. Math. Soc. 2017, 25, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lozano, A.; Mora, M.; Seara, C. Antimagic Labelings of Caterpillars. Appl. Math. Comput. 2019, 347, 734–740. [Google Scholar]
- Simanjuntak, R.; Nadeak, T.; Yasin, F.; Wijaya, K.; Hinding, N.; Sugeng, K.A. Another Antimagic Conjecture. Symmetry 2021, 13, 2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Siddiqui, M.K.; Ibrahim, M.; Ahmad, S.; Ahmad, A. Computing the Irregularity Strength of Planar Graphs. Mathematics 2018, 6, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bača, M.; Jendrol, S.; Miller, M.; Ryan, J. On irregular total labellings. Discrete Math. 2007, 307, 1378–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivančo, J.; Jendrol, S. The Total Edge Irregularity Strength of Trees. Discuss. Math. Graph Theory 2006, 26, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jendrol, S.; Miskuf, J.; Sotak, R. Total Edge Irregularity Strength of Complete Graphs and Complete Bipartite Graphs. Discret. Math. 2010, 310, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, A.; Siddiqui, M.K.; Ibrahim, M.; Asif, M. On the Total Irregularity Strength of Generalized Petersen Graph. Math. Rep. 2016, 18, 197–204. [Google Scholar]
- Naeem, M.; Siddiqui, M.K. Total Irregularity Strength of Isomorphic Copies of Generalized Petersen Graph. Discret. Math. Algorithms Appl. 2017, 9, 1750071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, A.; Bača, M.; Bashir, Y.; Siddiqui, M.K. Total Edge Irregularity Strength of Strong Product of Two Paths. Ars Combinatoria 2012, 106, 449–459. [Google Scholar]
- Pfender, F. Total Edge Irregularity Strength of Large Graphs. Discrete Math. 2012, 312, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Al-Mushayt, O.; Ahmad, A.; Siddiqui, M.K. On the Total Edge Irregularity Strength of Hexagonal Grid Graphs. Australas. J. Comb. 2012, 53, 263–271. [Google Scholar]
- Rajasingh, I.; Arockiamary, S.T. Total Edge Irregularity Strength of Series Parallel Graphs. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2015, 99, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Ramdani, R.; Salman, A.N.M. On the Total Irregularity Strength of Some Cartesian Product Graphs. AKCE Int. J. Graphs Comb. 2013, 10, 199–209. [Google Scholar]
- Bača, M.; Siddiqui, M.K. Total Edge Irregularity Strength of Generalized Prism. Appl. Math. Comput. 2014, 235, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosyida, I.; Indriati, D. Computing Total Edge Irregularity Strength of Some n-Uniform Cactus Chain Graphs and Related Chain Graphs. Indones. J. Comb. 2020, 4, 53–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siddiqui, M.K.; Afzal, D.; Faisal, M.R. Total Edge Irregularity Strength of Accordion Graphs. J. Comb. Optim. 2017, 34, 534–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siddiqui, M.K.; Ahmad, A.; Nadeem, M.F.; Bashir, Y. Total Edge Irregularity Strength of the Disjoint Union of Sun Graphs. Int. J. Math. Soft Comput. 2013, 3, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Susanti, Y.; Puspitasari, Y.I.; Khotimah, H. On Total Edge Irregularity Strength of Staircase Graphs and Related Graphs. Iran. J. Math. Sci. Inform. 2020, 15, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Susanti, Y.; Haq, M.A. On the Total Edge Irregularity Strength of Odd and Even Staircase Graphs. Preprints 2022, 2022080259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).