Next Article in Journal
Asymmetry in Three-Dimensional Sprinting with and without Running-Specific Prostheses
Next Article in Special Issue
Linear Differential Equations on Some Classes of Weighted Function Spaces
Previous Article in Journal
Fire Behavior Prediction in Larch Forests of the Kazakhstan Altai
Previous Article in Special Issue
Estimates on Some General Classes of Holomorphic Function Spaces
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Note on Type-Two Degenerate Poly-Changhee Polynomials of the Second Kind

1
Kwangwoon Glocal Education Centre, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 139-701, Korea
2
Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, P.O. Box 1664, Al Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2021, 13(4), 579; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13040579
Submission received: 11 March 2021 / Revised: 24 March 2021 / Accepted: 26 March 2021 / Published: 1 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Complex Analysis, in Particular Analytic and Univalent Functions)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we first define type-two degenerate poly-Changhee polynomials of the second kind by using modified degenerate polyexponential functions. We derive new identities and relations between type-two degenerate poly-Changhee polynomials of the second kind. Finally, we derive type-two degenerate unipoly-Changhee polynomials of the second kind and discuss some of their identities.

1. Introduction

As is well known, Changhee polynomials C h n ( x ) are defined by means of the following generating function
Z p ( 1 + t ) x + y d μ 1 y = 2 2 + t ( 1 + t ) x = n = 0 C h n ( x ) t n n !
(see [1,2]).
In the case when x = 0 , C h n ( 0 ) = C h n are called Changhee numbers.
The Euler polynomials are defined by the following generating function:
Z p e ( x + y ) t d μ 1 y = 2 e t + 1 e x t = n = 0 E n ( x ) t n n !
(see [3]).
When x = 0 , E n ( 0 ) = E n are called the Euler numbers.
From (1) and (2), we note that
C h n ( x ) = l = 0 n E l ( x ) S 1 ( n , l ) ,
and
E n ( x ) = l = 0 n C h n ( x ) S 2 ( n , l ) , ( n 0 )
(see [1]).
For any non-zero λ R , the degenerate exponential functions are defined by (see [4,5,6]):
e λ x ( t ) = ( 1 + λ t ) x λ , e λ ( t ) = e λ 1 ( t ) = ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ .
Here, we note that
e λ x ( t ) = n = 0 ( x ) n , λ t n n ! ,
where ( x ) 0 , λ = 1 , ( x ) n , λ = x ( x λ ) ( x 2 λ ) ( x ( n 1 ) λ ) , ( n 1 ) .
In [7,8], Carlitz considered degenerate Bernoulli polynomials, which are given by
t e λ ( t ) 1 e λ x ( t ) = t ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ 1 ( 1 + λ t ) x λ = n = 0 β n , λ ( x ) t n n ! .
On setting x = 0 , β n , λ ( 0 ) = β n , λ are called degenerate Bernoulli numbers.
For k Z , the modified degenerate polyexponential function [9] was defined by Kim and Kim to be
Ei k , λ ( x ) = n = 1 ( 1 ) n , λ x n ( n 1 ) ! n k , ( x < 1 ) .
Note that
Ei 1 , λ ( x ) = n = 1 ( 1 ) n , λ x n n ! = e λ ( x ) 1 .
In [9], Kim et al. introduced degenerate poly-Genocchi polynomials, which are given by
Ei k , λ log λ ( 1 + t ) e λ ( t ) + 1 e λ x ( t ) = n = 0 G n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! , ( k Z ) .
In the case when x = 0 , G n , λ ( k ) ( 0 ) = G n , λ ( k ) are called degenerate poly-Genocchi numbers.
Let λ C p with λ 1 . The degenerate Changhee polynomials of the second kind C h n , λ ( x ) are defined by
Z p ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + λ t ) ) x + y λ d μ 1 y = 2 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + λ t ) ) x λ = n = 0 C h n , λ ( x ) t n n !
(see [10]).
When x = 0 , C h n , λ ( 0 ) = C h n , λ are called the degenerate Changhee numbers of the second kind.
In [11], the degenerate Daehee polynomials D n , λ ( x ) are defined by
log λ ( 1 + t ) t ( 1 + t ) x = n = 0 D n , λ ( x ) t n n ! , ( λ R ) .
For x = 0 , D n , λ ( 0 ) = D n , λ are called degenerate Daehee numbers.
Note that lim λ 0 D n , λ ( x ) = D n ( x ) , ( n 0 ) (see [12]).
The degenerate Stirling numbers of the first kind are defined by
1 k ! ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) k = n = k S 1 , λ ( n , k ) t n n ! , ( k 0 )
(see [6,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]).
Note here that lim λ 0 S 1 , λ ( n , k ) = S 1 ( n , k ) , where S 1 ( n , k ) are the Stirling numbers of the first kind given by
1 k ! ( log ( 1 + t ) ) k = n = k S 1 ( n , k ) t n n ! , ( k 0 )
(see [5,20]).
The degenerate Stirling numbers of the second kind are given by
1 k ! e λ ( t ) 1 k = n = l S 2 , λ ( n , l ) t n n !
(see [21]).
We note here that lim λ 0 S 2 , λ ( n , k ) = S 2 ( n , k ) , where S 2 ( n , k ) are the Stirling numbers of the second kind given by
1 k ! ( e t 1 ) k = n = l S 2 ( n , l ) t n n !
(see [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]).
In this article, we introduce type-two degenerate poly-Changhee polynomials of the second kind and derive explicit expressions and some identities of those polynomials. In addition, we introduce type-two degenerate unipoly-Changhee polynomials of the second kind and derive explicit multifarious properties.

2. Type-Two Degenerate Poly-Changhee Polynomials of the Second Kind

In this section, we define degenerate Changhee polynomials of the second kind by using the modified degenerate polyexponential function; these are called type-two degenerate poly-Changhee numbers and polynomials of the second kind in the following.
Let λ C and k Z ; we consider that the type-two degenerate poly-Changhee polynomials of the second kind are defined by
2 Ei k , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) x λ = n = 0 C h n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! .
In the special case, when x = 0 , C h n , λ ( k ) ( 0 ) = C h n , λ ( k ) are called type-two degenerate poly-Changhee numbers of the second kind, where log λ ( t ) = 1 λ ( t λ 1 ) is the compositional inverse of e λ ( t ) that satisfies
log λ ( e λ ( t ) ) = e λ ( log λ ( t ) ) = t .
For k = 1 in (16), we get
2 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) x λ = n = 0 C h n , λ ( x ) t n n ! ,
where C h n , λ ( x ) are called degenerate Changhee polynomials of the second kind (see Equation (10)).
Obviously,
lim λ 0 2 Ei k , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) x λ = n = 0 lim λ 0 C h n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! = 2 Ei k ( log ( 1 + t ) ) t ( 2 + t ) ( 1 + t ) x = n = 0 C h n ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! ,
where C h n ( k ) ( x ) are called type-two poly-Changhee polynomials.
By using Equations (7), (10), and (16), we observe that
n = 0 C h n , λ ( k ) t n n ! = 2 Ei k , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) = 2 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ 1 t m = 0 ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) m + 1 ( m + 1 ) ! ( m + 1 ) k 1 = 2 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ 1 t m = 0 1 ( m + 1 ) k 1 l = m + 1 S 1 , λ ( l , m + 1 ) t l l ! = 2 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ 1 t m = 0 1 ( m + 1 ) k 1 l = m S 1 , λ ( l + 1 , m + 1 ) t l ( l + 1 ) ! = s = 0 C h n , λ t n n ! l = 0 m = 0 l 1 ( m + 1 ) k 1 S 1 , λ ( l + 1 , m + 1 ) l + 1 t l l ! L . H . S = n = 0 l = 0 n m = 0 l n l C h n l , λ S 1 , λ ( l + 1 , m + 1 ) l + 1 ( m + 1 ) k 1 t n n ! .
Therefore, using (19), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 1.
For n 0 and k Z , we have
C h n , λ ( k ) = l = 0 n m = 0 l n l C h n l , λ S 1 , λ ( l + 1 , m + 1 ) l + 1 ( m + 1 ) k 1 .
Corollary 1.
For n 0 and k Z , we have
C h n , λ ( 1 ) = l = 0 n m = 0 l n l C h n l , λ S 1 , λ ( l + 1 , m + 1 ) l + 1 .
From (16), we observe that
n = 0 C h n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! = 2 Ei k , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) x λ = n = 0 C h n , λ ( k ) t n n ! m = 0 x λ m λ m log ( 1 + t ) m = n = 0 C h n , λ ( k ) t n n ! m = 0 ( x ) m , λ l = m S 1 ( l , m ) t s s ! = n = 0 C h n , λ ( k ) t n n ! l = 0 m = 0 l ( x ) m , λ S 1 ( l , m ) t l l ! n = 0 C h n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! = n = 0 l = 0 n m = 0 l n l C h n l , λ ( k ) ( x ) m , λ S 1 ( l , m ) t n n ! .
By comparing the coefficients on both sides of (22), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2.
Let n 0 and k Z . Then, we have
C h n , λ ( k ) ( x ) = l = 0 n m = 0 l n l C h n l , λ ( k ) ( x ) m , λ S 1 ( l , m ) .
In [4], the degenerate Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind are defined by
t log λ ( 1 + t ) ( 1 + t ) x = n = 0 b n , λ ( x ) t n n !
(see [30]).
For x = 0 , b n , λ ( 0 ) = b n , λ are called degenerate Bernoulli numbers of the second kind.
From (7), we note that
d d x Ei k , ˘ ( log ˘ ( 1 + x ) ) = d dx n = 1 ( 1 ) n , ˘ ( log ˘ ( 1 + x ) ) n ( n 1 ) ! n k = ( 1 + x ) λ 1 log λ ( 1 + x ) n = 1 ( 1 ) n , λ ( log λ ( 1 + x ) ) n ( n 1 ) ! n k 1 = ( 1 + x ) λ 1 log λ ( 1 + x ) Ei k 1 , ˘ ( log λ ( 1 + x ) ) .
Thus, from (16) and (25), we have
n = 0 C h n , λ ( k ) x n n ! = 2 x ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + x ) ) 1 λ ) Ei k , λ log λ ( 1 + x ) = 2 x ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + x ) ) 1 λ ) 0 x ( 1 + t ) λ 1 log λ ( 1 + t ) 0 t ( 1 + t ) λ 1 log λ ( 1 + t ) 0 t ( k 2 ) times ( 1 + t ) λ 1 log λ ( 1 + t ) t d t d t = 2 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + x ) ) 1 λ m = 0 m 1 + + m k 1 = m m m 1 + + m k 1 × b m 1 , λ ( λ 1 ) m 1 + 1 b m 2 , λ ( λ 1 ) m 1 + m 2 + 1 b m k 1 , λ ( λ 1 ) m 1 + + m k 1 + 1 x m m ! n = 0 C h n , λ ( k ) x n n ! = 1 2 n = 0 m = 0 n n m m 1 + + m k 1 = m m m 1 + + m k 1 × b m 1 , λ ( λ 1 ) m 1 + 1 b m 2 , λ ( λ 1 ) m 1 + m 2 + 1 b m k 1 , λ ( λ 1 ) m 1 + + m k 1 + 1 C h n m , λ x n n ! .
Therefore, using (26), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 3.
For n 0 , we have
C h n , λ ( k ) = 1 2 m = 0 n n m m 1 + + m k 1 = m m m 1 + + m k 1 × b m 1 , λ ( λ 1 ) m 1 + 1 b m 2 , λ ( λ 1 ) m 1 + m 2 + 1 b m k 1 , λ ( λ 1 ) m 1 + + m k 1 + 1 C h n m , λ .
Corollary 2.
For n 0 , we have
C h n , λ ( 2 ) = 1 2 m = 0 n n m b m , λ ( λ 1 ) m + 1 C h n m , λ .
Let k 1 be an integer. For s C , we define the function η k , λ ( s ) as
η k , λ ( s ) = 1 Γ ( s ) 0 t s 1 t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) 2 Ei k , λ log λ ( 1 + t ) d t = 1 Γ ( s ) 0 1 t s 1 t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) 2 Ei k , λ log λ ( 1 + t ) d t + 1 Γ ( s ) 1 t s 1 t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) 2 Ei k , λ log λ ( 1 + t ) d t .
The second integral converges absolutely for any s C , and hence, the second term on the right-hand side vanishes at non-positive integers. That is,
lim s m 1 Γ ( s ) 1 t s 1 t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) 2 Ei k , λ log λ ( 1 + t ) d t 1 Γ ( m ) M = 0 .
On the other hand, for ( s ) > 0 , the first integral in (29) can be written as
1 Γ ( s ) l = 0 C h l , λ ( k ) l ! 1 s + l ,
which defines an entire function of s. Thus, we may conclude that η k , λ ( s ) can be continued to an entire function of s.
Further, from (28) and (29), we obtain
η k , λ ( m ) = lim s m 1 Γ ( s ) 0 1 t s 1 t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) 2 Ei k , λ log λ ( 1 + t ) d t = lim s m 1 Γ ( s ) 0 1 t s 1 l = 0 C h l , λ ( k ) t l l ! d t = lim s m 1 Γ ( s ) l = 0 C h l , λ ( k ) s + l 1 l ! = + 0 + + 0 + lim s m 1 Γ ( s ) 1 s + m C h m , λ ( k ) m ! + 0 + 0 + = lim s m Γ ( 1 s ) sin π s π s + m C h m , λ ( k ) m ! = Γ ( 1 + m ) cos ( π m ) C h m , λ ( k ) m ! = ( 1 ) m C h m , λ ( k ) .
Therefore, using (30), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 4.
Let k 1 and m N { 0 } , s C ; we have
η k , λ ( m ) = ( 1 ) m C h m , λ ( k ) .
From (16), we note that
2 Ei k , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) = t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) n = 0 C h n , λ ( k ) t n n ! = t n = 0 C h n , λ ( k ) t n n ! 1 + m = 0 1 λ m λ m ( log ( 1 + t ) ) m = t n = 0 C h n , λ ( k ) t n n ! 1 + m = 0 ( 1 ) m , λ l = m S 1 ( l , m ) t l l ! = t n = 0 C h n , λ ( k ) t n n ! 1 + l = 0 m = 0 l ( 1 ) m , λ S 1 ( l , m ) t l l ! = t n = 0 C h n , λ ( k ) + l = 0 n m = 0 l n l ( 1 ) m , λ S 1 ( l , m ) C h n l , λ ( k ) t n n ! = n = 1 n C h n 1 , λ ( k ) + l = 0 n 1 m = 0 l n l ( 1 ) m , λ S 1 ( l , m ) C h n 1 l , λ ( k ) t n n ! .
On the other hand,
2 Ei k , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) = 2 m = 1 ( 1 ) m , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) m ( m 1 ) ! m k = 2 m = 1 ( 1 ) m , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) m ( m 1 ) ! m k m ! m ! = 2 m = 1 ( 1 ) m , λ m k 1 n = m S 1 , λ ( n , m ) t n n ! L . H . S = 2 n = 1 m = 1 n ( 1 ) m , λ S 1 , λ ( n , m ) m k 1 t n n ! .
Therefore, using (31) and (32), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 5.
Let k 1 and m N { 0 } , s C ; we have
m = 1 n ( 1 ) m , λ S 1 , λ ( n , m ) m k 1
= n 2 C h n 1 , λ ( k ) + l = 0 n 1 m = 0 l n l ( 1 ) m , λ S 1 ( l , m ) C h n 1 l , λ ( k ) .
For k = 1 in Theorem 5, we get the following corollary.
Corollary 3.
For m N { 0 } , s C , we have
m = 1 n ( 1 ) m , λ S 1 , λ ( n , m )
= n 2 C h n 1 , λ + l = 0 n 1 m = 0 l n l ( 1 ) m , λ S 1 ( l , m ) C h n 1 l , λ .
From (16), we note that
n = 0 C h n , λ ( k ) ( x + 1 ) + C h n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! = 2 Ei k , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) x λ ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ = n = 0 C h n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! m = 0 1 λ m λ m ( log ( 1 + t ) ) m = n = 0 C h n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! m = 0 ( 1 ) m , λ l = m S 1 ( l , m ) t l l ! = n = 0 C h n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! l = 0 m = 0 l ( 1 ) m , λ S 1 ( l , m ) t l l ! = n = 0 l = 0 n m = 0 l n l ( 1 ) m , λ S 1 ( l , m ) C h n l , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! .
By comparing the coefficients on both sides of (33), we get the following theorem.
Theorem 6.
Let k Z and n 0 ; we have
C h n , λ ( k ) ( x + 1 ) + C h n , λ ( k ) ( x ) = l = 0 n m = 0 l n l ( 1 ) m , λ S 1 ( l , m ) C h n l , λ ( k ) ( x ) .

3. Type-Two Degenerate Unipoly-Changhee Polynomials of the Second Kind

The unipoly function u k ( x | p ) is defined by Kim and Kim to be (see [20]):
u k ( x | p ) = n = 1 p ( n ) n k x n , ( k Z ) ,
where p is any arithmetic function that is a real or complex valued function defined on the set of positive integers N .
Moreover,
u k ( x | 1 ) = n = 1 x n n k = Li k ( x )
(see [22,23,28]) is the ordinary polylogarithm function.
In this paper, we consider the degenerate unipoly function attached to polynomials p ( x ) as follows:
u k , λ ( x | p ) = i = 1 p ( i ) ( 1 ) i , λ x i i k .
It is worth noting that
u k , λ x | 1 Γ = Ei k , λ ( x )
is the modified degenerate polyexponential function.
By using (36), we define type-two degenerate unipoly-Changhee polynomials of the second kind by
2 u k , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) | p ) t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) x λ = n = 0 C h n , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! .
In the case when x = 0 , C h n , λ , p ( k ) ( 0 ) = C h n , λ , p ( k ) are called type-two degenerate unipoly-Changhee numbers of the second kind. Let us take p ( n ) = 1 Γ λ . Then, we have
n = 0 C h n , λ , 1 Γ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! = 2 u k , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) | 1 Γ p ) t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) x λ = 2 t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) m = 1 ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) m m k ( m + 1 ) ! ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) x λ = 2 Ei k , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) x λ = n = 0 C h n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! .
Thus, using (39), we have the following theorem.
Theorem 7.
Let n 0 and k Z , and let Γ n be a Gamma function. Then, we have
C h n , λ , 1 Γ ( k ) ( x ) = C h n , λ ( k ) ( x ) .
From (38), we get
n = 0 C h n , λ , p ( k ) t n n ! = 2 u k , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) | p ) t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) = 2 t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) m = 1 p ( m ) ( 1 ) m , λ m k ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) m = 2 t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) m = 0 p ( m + 1 ) ( 1 ) m + 1 , λ ( m + 1 ) ! ( m + 1 ) k l = m + 1 S 1 , λ ( m + 1 , l ) t l l ! = j = 0 C h j , λ t j j ! m = 0 l = 0 m p ( m + 1 ) ( 1 ) m + 1 , λ ( m + 1 ) ! ( m + 1 ) k S 1 , λ ( m + 1 , l + 1 ) l + 1 t l l ! = n = 0 l = 0 m = 0 l n l p ( m + 1 ) ( 1 ) m + 1 , λ ( m + 1 ) ! S 1 , λ ( m + 1 , l + 1 ) C h n l , λ ( m + 1 ) k ( l + 1 ) t n n ! .
Therefore, by comparing the coefficients on both sides of (41), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 8.
Let n N and k Z . Then, we have
C h n , λ , p ( k ) = l = 0 m = 0 l n l p ( m + 1 ) ( 1 ) m + 1 , λ ( m + 1 ) ! S 1 , λ ( m + 1 , l + 1 ) C h n l , λ ( m + 1 ) k ( l + 1 ) .
In particular,
C h n , λ , 1 Γ ( k ) = C h n , λ ( k ) = l = 0 m = 0 l n l S 1 , λ ( m + 1 , l + 1 ) C h n l , λ ( m + 1 ) k 1 ( l + 1 ) .
From (38), we observe that
n = 0 C n , λ ( k , p ) ( x ) t n n ! = 2 u k , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) | p ) t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) x λ = 2 u k , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) | p ) t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) m = 0 x λ m λ m log ( 1 + λ t ) m = n = 0 C h n , λ , p ( k ) t n n ! m = 0 ( x ) m , λ l = m S 1 ( l , m ) t l l ! = n = 0 C h n , λ , p ( k ) t n n ! l = 0 m = 0 l ( x ) m , λ S 1 ( l , m ) t l l ! L . H . S = n = 0 l = 0 n m = 0 l n l C h n l , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) m , λ S 1 ( l , m ) t n n ! .
From (44), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 9.
Let n 0 and k Z . Then, we have
C h n , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) = l = 0 n m = 0 l n l C h n l , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) m , λ S 1 ( l , m ) .
From (38), we observe that
n = 0 C h n , λ , p ( k ) t n n ! = 2 u k , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) | p ) t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) = 2 t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) m = 0 p ( m + 1 ) ( 1 ) m + 1 , λ m ! ( m + 1 ) k m ! ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) m + 1 = 2 log λ ( 1 + t ) t ( 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ ) m = 0 p ( m + 1 ) ( 1 ) m + 1 , λ m ! ( m + 1 ) k m ! ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) m = log λ ( 1 + t ) t 2 1 + ( 1 + λ log ( 1 + t ) ) 1 λ m = 0 p ( m + 1 ) ( 1 ) m + 1 , λ m ! ( m + 1 ) k l = m S 1 , λ ( l , m ) t l l ! = s = 0 D s , λ t s s ! a = 0 C h a , λ t a a ! l = 0 m = 0 n p ( m + 1 ) ( 1 ) m + 1 , λ m ! ( m + 1 ) k S 1 , λ ( l , m ) t l l ! = b = 0 a = 0 b b a D b a , λ C h a , λ t b b ! l = 0 m = 0 n p ( m + 1 ) ( 1 ) m + 1 , λ m ! ( m + 1 ) k S 1 , λ ( l , m ) t l l ! L . H . S = n = 0 l = 0 n a = 0 n l m = 0 l n l D n l a , λ C a , λ p ( m + 1 ) ( 1 ) m + 1 , λ m ! ( m + 1 ) k S 1 , λ ( l , m ) t n n ! .
By comparing the coefficients on both sides of (46), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 10.
Let n 0 and k Z . Then, we have
C h n , λ , p ( k ) = l = 0 n a = 0 n l m = 0 l n l D n l a , λ C h a , λ p ( m + 1 ) ( 1 ) m + 1 , λ m ! ( m + 1 ) k S 1 , λ ( l , m ) .

4. Conclusions

In this article, we introduced type-two degenerate poly-Changhee polynomials of the second kind and derived some beautiful identities and relations between type-two degenerate poly-Changhee numbers of the second kind and Stirling numbers of first and second kind. In addition, we gave the relation between degenerate Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind and type-two degenerate poly-Changhee numbers of the second kind. Again, we defined type-two degenerate unipoly-Changhee polynomials of the the second kind and obtained some properties and relationships of degenerate unipoly-Changhee numbers of the second kind and the Daehee numbers.

Author Contributions

Both authors contributed equally to the manuscript and typed, read, and approved the final manuscript. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T.; Seo, J. A note on Changhee polynomials and numbers. Adv. Stud. Theor. Phys. 2013, 7, 993–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S. A note on nonlinear Changhee differential equations. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2016, 23, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Dolgy, D.V.; Kwon, J. Some identities on degenerate Genocchi and Euler numbers. Informatica 2020, 31, 42–51. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kim, T.; Jang, L.-C.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, H.-Y. Some identities on type 2 degenerate Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind. Symmetry 2020, 12, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S. Degenerate polyexponential functions and degenerate Bell polynomials. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2020, 487, 124017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T. A note on a new type of degenerate Bernoulli numbers. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2020, 27, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Carlitz, L. Degenerate Stirling, Bernoulli and Eulerian numbers. Util. Math. 1979, 15, 51–88. [Google Scholar]
  8. Carlitz, L. A degenerate Staudt-Clausen theorem. Arch. Math. 1956, 7, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Kwon, J.; Kim, H.Y. A note on degenerate Genocchi and poly-Genocchi numbers and polynomials. J. Ineq. Appl. 2020, 110, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S. Degenerate Changhee numbers and polynomials of the second kind. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1707.09721v1. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, H.-Y.; Kwon, J. Some results on degenerate Daehee and Bernoulli numbers and polynomials. Adv. Differ. Eq. 2020, 311, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sharma, S.K.; Khan, W.A.; Araci, S.; Ahmed, S.S. New type of degenerate Daehee polynomials of the second kind. Adv. Differ. Eq. 2020, 428, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Khan, W.A.; Acikgoz, M.; Duran, U. Note on the type 2 degenerate multi-poly-Euler polynomials. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, H.Y.; Kwon, J. Some identities of degenerate Bell polynomials. Mathematics 2020, 8, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, H.Y.; Kwon, J. Degenerate Stirling polynomials of the second kind and some applications. Symmetry 2019, 11, 1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S. Degenerate Laplace transform and degenerate gamma function. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2017, 24, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kim, T.; Khan, W.A.; Sharma, S.K.; Ghayasuddin, M. A note on parametric kinds of the degenerate poly-Bernoulli and poly-Genocchi polynomials. Symmetry 2020, 12, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Kwon, J.; Lee, H. Degenerate polyexponential functions and type 2 degenerate poly-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials. Adv. Differ. Eq. 2020, 168, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Muhiuddin, M.; Khan, W.A.; Duran, U. Two variable type 2 Fubini polynomials. Mathematics 2021, 9, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T. A note on polyexponential and unipoly functions. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2019, 26, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, T. A note on degenerate Stirling polynomials of the second kind. Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 2017, 20, 319–331. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hamahata, Y. Poly-Euler polynomials and Arakwa-Kaneko type zeta function. Funct. Approx. 2014, 51, 7–22. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kaneko, M. Poly-Bernoulli numbers. J. Théor Nombres Bordx. 1997, 9, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Khan, W.A. A new class of degenerate Frobenius-Euler-Hermite polynomials. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. 2018, 28, 567–576. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T. Higher-order Bernoulli and poly-Bernoulli mixed type polynomials. Georgian Math. J. 2015, 22, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kucukoglu, I.; Simsek, B.; Simsek, Y. An approach to negative hypergeometric distribution by generating function for special numbers and polynomials. Turk. J. Math. 2019, 43, 2337–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kim, H.Y.; Khan, W.A. Some identities of a new type of degenerate poly-Frobenius polynomials and numbers. Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 2021, 24, 33–45. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lewin, L. Polylogarithms and Associated Functions; North-Holland Publishing Co.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; New York, NY, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee, D.S.; Kim, H.-Y.; Jang, L.-C. Type 2 degenerate poly-Euler polynomials. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Roman, S. The Umbral Calculus, Pure and Applied Mathematics; Academic Press, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1984; ISBN 0-12-594380-6. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dolgy, D.V.; Khan, W.A. A Note on Type-Two Degenerate Poly-Changhee Polynomials of the Second Kind. Symmetry 2021, 13, 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13040579

AMA Style

Dolgy DV, Khan WA. A Note on Type-Two Degenerate Poly-Changhee Polynomials of the Second Kind. Symmetry. 2021; 13(4):579. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13040579

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dolgy, Dmitry V., and Waseem A. Khan. 2021. "A Note on Type-Two Degenerate Poly-Changhee Polynomials of the Second Kind" Symmetry 13, no. 4: 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13040579

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop