1. Introduction
In mathematics, quantum calculus or
q-calculus is the study of calculus without limits. In the early Eighteenth Century, the well-known mathematician Leonhard Euler (1707–1783) established
q-calculus in the way of Newton’s work for infinite series. Yet,
q-calculus was known to be initiated by F. H. Jackson in 1910, who introduced the
q-derivative and
q-integral in [
1] (see also [
2]).
As a connection between the fields of mathematics and physics,
q-calculus has played a significant role in physics phenomena; for instance, Fock [
3] studied the symmetry of hydrogen atoms using the
q-difference equation. Furthermore, in modern mathematical analysis,
q-calculus has many applications such as combinatorics, orthogonal polynomials, basic hypergeometric functions, number theory, quantum theory, mechanics, and the theory of relativity; see also [
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14,
15,
16,
17,
18,
19,
20,
21,
22,
23,
24] and the references cited therein. The book by V. Kac and P. Cheung [
25] covers the basic theoretical concept of
q-calculus.
In 2013, being one of the most attractive areas, some new researchers are interested in
q-calculus; in particular, J. Tariboon and S.K. Ntouyas [
26] defined the
-calculus and proved some of its significant properties. Next, J. Tariboon and S.K. Ntouyas [
27] extended some of the important integral inequalities to
q-calculus. Moreover, in 2016, J. Necmettin, Z.S. Mehmet, and İ. İmdat [
28] proved the correctness of the left part of the
q-Hermite–Hadamard inequality and the generalized
q-Hermite–Hadamard inequality. With these results, many researchers have extended some important topics of
q-calculus together with applications in many fields, such as
q-integral inequalities; see [
29,
30,
31,
32,
33,
34,
35,
36,
37] for more details.
Fractional calculus is the field of mathematical analysis that deals with the investigation and applications of integrals and derivatives of arbitrary order. In 2015, J. Tariboon, S.K. Ntouyas, and P. Agarwal [
38] proposed a new
q-shifting operator
for studying new concepts of fractional
q-calculus. Furthermore, in 2016, since inequalities play a vital role in modern analysis, as well as mathematical analysis depends on many inequalities, W. Sudsutad, S.K Ntouyas, and J. Tariboon [
39] studied some fractional
q-integral inequalities such as the fractional
q-Hermite–Hadamard integral inequality, the
q-Hölder integral inequality, the
q-Korkine equality, the
q-Grüss integral inequality, the
q-Grüss–Chebyshev integral inequality, and the
q-Polya–Szeqö integral inequality on finite intervals.
Inspired and motivated by some of the above applications, in 2016, M. Tunç and E. Göv [
40,
41] defined the
-derivative and the
-integral on finite intervals and proved some of its properties. Later on, they also extended some of the new important integral inequalities on finite intervals to
-calculus. In 2017, M. Kun, İ. İmdat, N. Alp, and M.Z. Sarikaya [
42] proved the correctness of the left part of the
-Hermite–Hadamard inequality and the generalized
-Hermite–Hadamard inequality. In addition, in 2020, J. Soontharanon and T. Sitthiwirattham [
43] introduced the new concept of
-difference operators on
, where
, and studied some fractional
-calculus properties in the sense of
-difference operators; especially, they proposed the fractional
-difference operator of the Riemann–Liouville and Caputo types.
Shortly afterward, many authors generalized and developed the
q-calculus theory into a two-parameter
-integer, which is used efficiently in many fields, and some results on the study of
-calculus can be found in [
44,
45,
46,
47,
48,
49,
50,
51,
52,
53,
54,
55,
56,
57,
58,
59,
60,
61,
62,
63,
64,
65,
66,
67,
68].
However, fractional -calculus on finite intervals via some integral inequalities has not been studied yet. This gap is the motivation and inspiration for this research. The main purpose of this paper is to study the fractional -calculus on finite intervals and to give some of its important properties. Then, we prove many fractional -integral inequalities on finite intervals, for instance the fractional -Hölder integral inequality, the -Hermite–Hadamard integral inequality, the -Korkine equality, the -Grüss integral inequality, the -Grüss–Chebyshev integral inequality, and the -Polya–Szeqö integral inequality.
2. Preliminaries
In this section, we would like to recall some well-known facts on fractional
-calculus, which can be found in [
10,
11,
38,
53,
55]. Throughout this paper, let
be an interval with
and
be constants,
A
q-shifting operator is defined as:
where
. For any positive integer
k, we have:
By computing directly, we get the following results.
Property 1. For any and for all positive integers we have:
- (i)
;
- (ii)
;
- (iii)
;
- (iv)
;
- (v)
;
- (vi)
, for ;
- (vii)
.
For
and
, the
q-Pochhammer symbol or the
q-shifted factorial is a
q-analogue of the Pochhammer symbol, which is defined by:
and the new power of
q-shifting operator is defined by:
More generally, if
, then:
and:
The -derivative of function f is defined on at as follows.
Definition 1 ([
40]).
Let be a continuous function. Then:is called the -derivative of a function f at a. Obviously,
f is
-differentiable on
if
exists for all
. In Definition 1, if
, then
, which is the
q-derivative of function
f on
, and if
, then (
8) reduces to the
q-derivative of the function
f on
; see [
25,
41] for more details.
Definition 2 ([
40]).
Let be a continuous function. Then:is called the -integral of f for . Furthermore, if
, then the
-integral is defined by:
Note that if
and
, then (
10) reduces to the
q-integral of the function, which can be found in [
26].
Theorem 1 ([
40]).
The following formulas hold for - (i)
;
- (ii)
;
- (iii)
, for .
Theorem 2 ([
40]).
If are continuous functions, and , then the following formulas hold:- (i)
;
- (ii)
;
- (iii)
.
Let us define the new
-analogue of the power function
with
and
as the following:
More generally, if
, then:
Property 2. For , the following formulas hold:
- (i)
;
- (ii)
.
Proof. To prove (ii), we use (i) and let
in (
14); we have:
□
Lemma 1. If is continuous at a, then: Proof. By Definition 2, we have:
By letting
and using Definition 2, we get:
The proof is complete. □
For
, the
-gamma function is defined by:
and an equivalent definition of (
16) was given in [
56] as:
where:
Obviously,
. For
, the definition of the
-beta function is defined by:
and (
18) can also be written as:
see [
43,
69] for more details.
3. Main Results
From Lemma 1, we shall give that which leads to a definition of the fractional
-integral of the Riemann–Liouville type with the consideration of the
n-time as follows:
The function
f in (
20) will be assumed to be continuous on
. From (
15), we have:
Integrating
n-times reduces (
20) to a single
-integral on
as follows.
Definition 3. Let f be defined on , and let The Riemann–Liouville fractional -integral is defined by: Definition 4. The fractional -derivative of the Riemann–Liouville type of order of a continuous function f on is defined by and:where and v is the smallest integer greater than or equal to α. The basic
q-hypergeometric function is defined in [
70] as:
and
q-Vandermonde reversing the order of summation is defined as:
Theorem 3. If f is a continuous function on and , then the Riemann–Liouville fractional -integral has the following semi-group property: Proof. For
, we have:
Applying the
-gamma function in (
16), we obtain:
Taking
and interchanging the order of summation, we obtain:
Substituting (
28) into (
27), we get:
Substituting (
32) into (
31), we get:
which is the series representation of
. Therefore, (
26) holds. □
Throughout this paper, the variable
s is shown inside the fractional integral, which is denoted as:
Lemma 2. If , and , then the following formula holds: Proof. Applying Definition 2, Property 2, and (
18) and (
19), we have:
The proof of Lemma 2 is complete. □
Remark 1. Define functions by and . For , we get:
- (i)
;
- (ii)
Next, we study some fractional integral inequalities on finite intervals.
Theorem 4. Let be a continuous function, , and . If , such that then we have: Proof. Using Definition 3 and the discrete Hölder inequality, we have:
Therefore, the proof of Theorem 4 is complete. □
Remark 2. If , then (35) reduces to the fractional q-Hölder inequality on as:which appeared in [39]. However, if and , then (36) reduces to the q-Hölder inequality as:which can be found in [
71].
Theorem 5. If is a convex differentiable function and , then we have: Proof. From the left-hand side of the proof in Theorem 3 and Theorem 5.1 in [
15,
42], respectively, there is a one line support:
for all
and
Multiplying by
on both sides of (
38), we obtain:
Taking the fractional
-integration of order
with respect to
s on (
39), where
, we have:
Moreover, from the left-hand side of (
40), we have:
and similar to the computation of (
41) above, we also get:
By substituting (
42) and (
41) into (
40), we obtain the first part of (
37). On the other hand, from the proof of the right-hand side of Theorem 3 in [
42], we have:
Multiplying by
on both sides of (
43) and taking the
-integral of order
with respect to
, we obtain:
By using the same computation as in (
41) and (
42) for the left-hand side of (
44), we obtain:
Substituting (
45) into (
44), we derive the second part of (
37). Therefore, the proof of Theorem 5 is complete. □
Remark 3. If , then (
37)
reduces to the fractional q-Hermite–Hadamard integral inequality as:which appeared in [15]. If , then (
37)
reduces to the -Hermite–Hadamard integral inequality on as:which appeared in [
42]
. Moreover, if and then (
47)
reduces to the classical Hermite–Hadamard integral inequality as: which can be found in [
72,
73].
Theorem 6. If : are continuous functions, , , and then we have: Proof. Using Definition 3 and applying (
18), we have:
Therefore, the proof is complete. □
Remark 4. If , then (
48)
reduces to the fractional q-Korkine equality on as:which appeared in [
39]
. Moreover, if , then (
48)
reduces to the q-Korkine equality as:which appeared in [
27].
Theorem 7. If : are continuous functions, , , and , then we have: Proof. Using Theorem 3 and Definition 3, we have:
Applying the classical discrete Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, we have:
Consequently, the proof of (
49) is finished. □
Remark 5. If , then (
49)
reduces to the fractional q-Cauchy–Bunyakovsky–Schwarz integral inequality on as:which appeared in [
39]
. Moreover, if , then (
49)
reduces to the q-Cauchy–Bunyakovsky–Schwarz integral inequality as:which can be found in [
27].
Theorem 8. If are continuous functions satisfying:for all , , , , and , then we have: Proof. Applying Theorem 7, we have:
On the other hand, we have:
From (
50), we have
. It follows that:
Applying (
52) and using the truth that
, where
, we have:
From (
50), it follows that:
Applying Theorem 6 again for (
57), we have that Theorem 8 holds. □
Remark 6. If , then (
51)
reduces to the fractional q-Grüss integral inequality as:which appeared in [
39]
. Moreover, if , , and , then (
51)
reduces to the classical Grüss integral as:which can be found in [
72,
73].
Theorem 9. If are -Lipschitzian continuous functions such that: , , , and , then we have: Proof. From the condition in (
58), we obtain:
Taking double fractional
-integration of order
with respect to
with
, we have:
From Remark 1, we get:
and:
Substituting (
63) into (
62) and applying to (
60), we complete the proof. □
Remark 7. If , then (
59)
reduces to the fractional q-Grüss–Chebyshev integral inequality on as:which appeared in [
39]
. Moreover, if and , then (59) reduces to the classical Grüss–Chebyshev integral as:which can be found in [
72,
73].
Theorem 10. If are two positive integrable functions satisfying:for all , , and , then we have: Proof. For
, from (
64), we obtain:
which yields:
and:
Multiplying (
66) and (
67), we get:
or:
Therefore, (
69) can be written as:
Multiplying
and integrating of order
on both sides of (
70), where
with
, we obtain:
Applying the AM-GMinequality, we get:
which turns into:
Therefore, Theorem 10 is proven. □
Remark 8. If , then (
65)
reduces to the fractional q-Polya–Szeqö integral inequality on [a, b] as:which appeared in [
39]
. Moreover, if , , and , then (
65)
reduces to the classical Polya–Szeqö integral inequality as:which can be found in [
74].