1. Introduction
In 1925 Hardy [
1] employed the calculus of variations and proved the inequality
where
and integrable over any finite interval
and
is integrable and convergent over
and
. The constant
is the best possible.
In 1928 Hardy [
2] generalized the inequality (1) and proved that if
and
is non-negative for
, then:
Moreover,
The constants and are the best possible.
In recent years, several scholars have examined fractional inequalities by using the fractional derivative of Caputo and Riemann–Liouville; we refer to the papers [
3,
4,
5,
6,
7] for these results.
In [
8,
9], the authors expanded the calculus of fractional order to conformable calculus. Lately, some scholars have expanded classical inequalities by applying conformable fractional formulas such as Opial’s inequality [
10,
11,
12], Hermite–Hadamard’s inequality [
13,
14,
15], Chebyshev’s inequality [
16] and Steffensen’s inequality [
17].
The original motivation for this paper is obtaining the fractional forms of some extensions of Hardy’s type inequalities and their reverses using conformable fractional calculus, and as a special case, we put to get the generalized ones.
The paper is structured as follows: In
Section 2, we will present some concepts for the conformable fractional calculus and also the Hölder’s inequality for
-fractional differentiable functions that will represent our key outcomes. In
Section 3, we shall set out generalizations of Hardy’s type inequalities and revers relations in each case for
-fractional differentiable functions.
2. Key Concepts and Lemmas
In this section, we present some basic definitions concerning the conformable fractional calculus that will be used throughout the paper. For the latest findings on conformable derivatives and integrals, we refer to [
8,
9].
Definition 1. Let
. Then the conformable fractional derivative of order
of h is defined as:for all and . For
and
be
-differentiable at a point
s, then:
Further, for
and
be
-differentiable at a point
s with
, then:
Remark 1. If h is a differentiable function, then: Definition 2. Let . Then the conformable fractional integral order of h is defined asfor all s and . Now, we state some lemmas which play important roles in our proofs of the main results. First, the integration by parts formula is given in the following lemma:
Lemma 1. Suppose that : be two functions such that is -differentiable and then: Next, we state Hölder’s and reversed Hölder’s inequality for -conformable functions, which will mainly be used to prove the results of this paper.
Lemma 2. Let be a continuous function and . Then:where . This inequality is reversed if and if or . 3. Hardy’s Type Inequalities of a Fractional Order
In this section, we state and prove the main outcomes of this paper and we begin with the following theorem:
Theorem 1. Let
be a non-decreasing function and . If is non-decreasing and , then: When
, we have
Proof. We start with the following identity:
Since
is non-decreasing, then we have:
which is (8). For
, we have (9). The proof is complete. □
The theorem below is the generalization of Hardy’s inequality (1) on conformable calculus.
Theorem 2. Let h be a non-negative -integrable function on is non-increasing andwhere . Then Proof. Since
applying Hölder’s inequality with index
and
, we get
Now, since
is non-increasing, we have:
The proof is complete. □
Corollary 1. [In Theorem 2] For then we havewhich is [[18], Theorem 2.2]. Proof. The proof follows from Theorem 2 for . □
Corollary 2. [In Theorem 2] For , then we have the classical Hardy inequality: Proof. The proof follows from Theorem 2 for □
The following finding concerns the converse of Hardy’s inequality.
Theorem 3. Let be a non-negative -integrable function on is non-decreasing andwhere . Then Proof. Since
applying reverse Hölder’s inequality with index
and
, we get
Now, since
is non-decreasing, we have:
then:
The proof is complete. □
Corollary 3. [In Theorem 3] For , then we havewhich is [[18], Theorem 2.3]. Proof. The proof follows from Theorem 3 for . □
Theorem 4. Let be a non-negative -integrable function on
is non-increasing andwhere . Then Proof. Since
applying Hölder’s inequality with index
and
, we get
Now, since
is non-decreasing, we have:
The proof is complete. □
Corollary 4. [In Theorem 4] For , then we havewhich is [[19], Theorem 2.1]. Proof. The proof follows from Theorem 4 for . □
Corollary 5. [In Theorem 4] For , then we have the classical Hardy inequality. Proof. The proof follows from Theorem 4 for □
Theorem 5. Let h be a non-negative -integrable function on is non-decreasing and:where . Then: Proof. Since
applying reverse Hölder’s inequality with index
and
, we get:
Now, since
is non-decreasing, we have:
The proof is complete. □
Corollary 6. [In Theorem 5] For , then we have:which is [[19], Theorem 2.2]. Proof. The proof follows from Theorem 5 for . □
Theorem 6. Let be a non-negative -integrable function on is non-decreasing andwhere . Then Proof. Since
applying Hölder’s inequality with index
and
, we get
Now, since
is non-decreasing, we have:
The proof is complete. □
Corollary 7. [In Theorem 6] For , we havewhich is [[20], Theorem 1]. Proof. The proof follows from Theorem 6 for . □
Corollary 8. [In Theorem 6] For , then we have the classical Hardy inequality Proof. The proof follows from Theorem 6 for □
Theorem 7. Let h be a non-negative -integrable function on is non-decreasing and:where . Then: Proof. Since
applying reverse Hölder’s inequality with index
and
we get:
Now, since
is non-decreasing, we have:
The proof is complete. □
Corollary 9. [In Theorem 7] For , then we havewhich is [[20], Theorem 2]. Proof. The proof follows from Theorem 7 for . □
4. Applications
Lyapunov’s inequality is an important result in mathematics with many different applications see ([
21,
22] and the reference therein). The result, as proved by Lyapunov in 1907 [
23], asserts that if
is real and continuous functions on [
a,
b], then a necessary condition for the boundary value problem:
to have nontrivial solutions is given by:
In this section, as the application of conformable fractional calculus, we obtain a Lyapunov-type inequality for a conformable fractional Sturm-Liouville equation subject to Dirichlet-type boundary conditions. To this aim, we must prove the following lemma.
Lemma 3. Let be a given real number and Let be a non-negative and continuous function on [a, b]. Further, Let be an absolutely continuous function on [a, b], with . Then, the following inequality holds: Proof. Since
then
and also
and so
Applying the Hölder’s inequality with index
and
, it follows that:
Now, multiplying both sides of the above inequality by and integrating the resulting inequality from a to b, we obtain the inequality (16). □
Corollary 10. In (Lemma 3) at , then we have the inequality: Theorem 8. If the following fractional boundary value problemhas a nontrivial solution
, where is real and continuous functions, then: Proof. Multiplying (18) by
and integrating by parts from
to
where:
then:
Applying the inequality (17)
then we have
□
Corollary 11. In (Theorem 8) at then we obtain the classical Lyapunov-type inequality for differential equation subject to Dirichlet-type boundary conditions.
Author Contributions
Formal analysis, G.A., M.K., M.Z. and C.C.; conceptualization, H.M.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University through the Fast-track Research Funding Program. This paper is supported financially by the Academy of Scientific Research and Technology (ASRT), Egypt, under initiatives of Science Up Faculty of Science (Grant No. 6695).
Data Availability Statement
No data were used to support this study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
- Hardy, G.H. Notes on some points in the integral calculus, (LXIT). Messenger Math. 1925, 54, 150–156. [Google Scholar]
- Hardy, G.H. Notes on some points in the integral calculus LXIV. Further inequalities between integrals. Messenger Math. 1928, 57, 12–16. [Google Scholar]
- Bogdan, K.; Dyda, B. The best constant in a fractional Hardy inequality. Math. Nach. 2011, 284, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jleli, M.; Samet, B. Lyapunov-type inequalities for a fractional differential equation with mixed boundary conditions. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2015, 18, 443–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin-Reyes, F.J.; Sawyer, E. Weighted inequalities for Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals of order one and greater. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1989, 106, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Usta, F.; Sarikays, M.Z. Some improvements of conformable fractional integral inequalities. Int. J. Anal. Appl. 2017, 14, 162–166. [Google Scholar]
- Yildiz, C.; Ozdemir, M.E.; Onelan, H.K. Fractional integral inequalities for different functions. New Trends Math. Sci. 2015, 3, 110–117. [Google Scholar]
- Abdeljawad, T. On conformable fractional calculus. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2015, 279, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalil, R.; Al Horani, M.; Yousef, A.; Sababheh, M. A new definition of fractional derivative. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2014, 264, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saker, S.; Kenawy, M.; AlNemer, G.; Zakarya, M. Some Fractional Dynamic Inequalities of Hardy’s Type Via Conformable Calculus. Mathematics 2020, 8, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sarikays, M.Z.; Budak, H. Opial type inequalities for conformable fractional integral. J. Appl. Anal. 2019, 25, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarikaya, M.Z.; Budak, H. New inequalities of Opial type for conformable fractional integrals. Turk. J. Math. 2017, 41, 1164–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, Y.M.; Khan, M.A.; Ali, T.; Dragomir, S.S. Inequalities for α-fractional differentiable functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2017, 1, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Khan, M.A.; Ali, T.; Dragomir, S.S.; Sarikaya, M.Z. Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for conformable fractional integrals. Rev. Real Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fis. Nat. Ser. A Mat. 2017, 112, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Set, E.; Cozpmar, A.; Ekinci, A. Hermit-Hadamard type inequalities via conformable fractional integrals. Acta Math. Univ. Comenian. 2017, 86, 309–320. [Google Scholar]
- Akkurt, A.; Yildirim, M.E.; Yildirim, H. On some integral inequalities for conformable fractional integrals. Asian J. Math. Comput. Res. 2017, 15, 205–212. [Google Scholar]
- Sarikaya, M.Z.; Yaldiz, H.; Budak, H. Steffensen’s integral inequality for conformable fractional integrals. Int. J. Anal. Appl. 2017, 15, 23–30. [Google Scholar]
- Sulaiman, W.T. Some Hardy type integral inequalities. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25, 520–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sroysang, B. More on some Hardy type integral inequalities. J. Math. Inequal. 2017, 8, 497–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mehrez, K. Some generalization and refined Hardy type integral inequalities. Afr. Mat. 2016, 28, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashizume, M. Minimization problem related to a Lyapunov inequality. J. Math. Anal. 2015, 432, 517–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, T.; Liu, J. Lyapunov inequality for dynamic equation with order n +1 on time scales. J. Dyn. Syst. Geom. Theor. 2015, 13, 95–101. [Google Scholar]
- Liapounoff, A.M. Probleme general de la stabilite du movement. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse 1907, 9, 203–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).