Abstract
Archimedean copulas form a very wide subclass of symmetric copulas. Most of the popular copulas are members of the Archimedean copulas. These copulas are obtained using real functions known as Archimedean generators. In this paper, we observe that under certain conditions the cumulative distribution functions on (0, 1) and probability generating functions can be used as Archimedean generators. It is shown that most of the well-known Archimedean copulas can be generated using such distributions. Further, we introduced new Archimedean copulas.
1. Introduction
Copulas are multivariate probability distributions with uniform marginal distributions. Hence, they are useful tools to generate multivariate distribution functions along with different dependence structures. The first appearance of copula was in 1959 by sklar [1]. Recently, there has been increasing attentions paid to copulas. This is due to two important assets of copulas that it is a proper technique to study dependence independently of the marginal distributions, besides, it is a method for constructing multivariate distributions. Accordingly, it is convenient to handle several modeling issues by copulas. Applications from different fields, such as, finance, economy, and survival analysis were studied using copulas. A review of copula applications to multivariate survival analysis can be found in Georges et al. [2].
Archimedean copulas form an important class of symmetric copulas; due to its simplicity to construct and other useful properties. Genest and MacKay [3] defined Archimedean copula in the form , where is a real-valued function satisfies certain conditions (see Section 2). The function is known as additive Archimedean generator. Marshal and Olkin [4] showed that Archimedean copulas could be easily generated using inverse Laplace transformations. Many famous copulas belong to Archimedean class. For instance, Frank family that introduced by Frank [5], the Clayton family which appeared first in [6] and the family of Ali-Mikhail-Haq [7] are Archimedean copulas.
One of the main interests when studying copulas is to estimate the dependence parameter. An ordinary method of estimation is to maximize the full likelihood function. However, a method of two-steps maximum likelihood could also be used. With this method, the parameters of the marginals are estimated in the first step, then, the dependence parameter is estimated using the copula after replacing the marginals parameters by their estimates. A Bayesian approach is a less common method of copulas estimation. For more details see [8].
In this paper, we utilize the properties of cumulative distribution functions (cdfs) on to obtain additive and multiplicative Archimedean generators. By observing that the probability generating functions (pgfs) are cdfs on , we give conditions under which these pgf and their inverses can be used as Archimedean generators.
The remainder of this paper proceeds as follows: In Section 2, we give a short review for both additive and multiplicative Archimedean generators. In Section 3, some criterions are given to generate copulas from cdfs under several monotonic conditions on their probability density functions (pdfs). Examples of these generators are also presented. Section 4 address the sufficient conditions on the pgf and its inverse to be multiplicative Archimedean generators. Using pgfs some well-known copulas and new ones are defined.
2. Additive and Multiplicative Archimedean Generators
In this section, definitions for both additive and multiplicative Archimedean generators are presented. Relevant properties of these generators and the interrelation among them are discussed.
Genest and MacKay [3] gave the following definition for Archimedean generator.
Definition 1.
A function which is continuous, strictly decreasing and convex, such that and , is called Archimedean generator.
Definition 2.
Let φ be a continuous, strictly decreasing function from I to , such that . The pseudo-inverse of φ is the function given by
Note that, if , the pseudo-inverse describes an ordinary inverse function (i.e., and in this case φ is known as a strict Archimedean generator. The definition of Archimedean copula as presented in Nelsen [9] is given by the following theorem.
Theorem 1.
Let φ be an Archimedean generator, then
defines a class of bivariate copula, the so-called Archimedean copula.
In the previous, is said to be an additive Archimedean generator of the copula C. Also, Nelson [9] gave the following definition.
Definition 3.
Let be a continuous, strictly increasing and log-concave function, such that . Then, ψ is called a multiplicative Archimedean generator.
Note that, (see [9], p. 112), is a multiplicative Archimedean generator if and only if where is additive Archimedean generator.
Definition 4.
Let ψ be a continuous, strictly increasing function from I to I, such that . The pseudo-inverse of ψ is the function
Note that, if , the pseudo-inverse describes an ordinary inverse function (i.e., and in this case is known as a strict multiplicative generator. Consequently, Theorem 1 can be restated as
Theorem 2.
Let ψ be a multiplicative Archimedean generator. Then, the function
is a copula.
3. Distribution Functions as Archimedean Generators
Distribution functions and their survival functions are monotone functions and hence certain conditions can be utilized to produce Archimedean generators.
It is very interesting to notice that a distribution function on I is increasing and satisfies and , which are conditions required by multiplicative Archimedean generator. Therefore, under further assumptions one can obtain multiplicative Archimedean generators from such distributions. On the other hand, the survival function is decreasing and satisfied and , hence, it can be used to introduce additive Archimedean generator. In the following we list some results in this direction.
Theorem 3.
Let F be a strictly increasing cdf on I with decreasing probability density function f, then the survival function is an additive Archimedean generator (non-strict) and the corresponding copula is
Proof.
Note that the assumption that F is strictly increasing on I implies is strictly decreasing. Also, the assumption that f is decreasing implies that is convex. Hence, the result follows immediately from Theorem 1. □
Note that , thus, an equivalent form of (1) in terms of the distribution function is
Example 1.
The cdf of the exponential distribution restricted to I is and , which has decreasing pdf as . Therefore, using Theorem 3, we could use as an additive Archimedean generator; which constructs the copula
The plot of this copula for different values of is shown in Figure 1. From the graph, we can notice that this copula is increasing in . Figure 2 shows the density for several values of , where the density copula is given by
Figure 1.
Copula 2 with parameters .
Figure 2.
The density of Copula 2 with parameters .
Now, consider the function . Then, is additive Archimedean generator if is decreasing or equivalently is increasing. Hence, we have the following corollary.
Corollary 1.
If F is a strictly increasing cdf on I with increasing pdf f, then
is a copula.
Now moving to multiplicative Archimedean generating functions, we observe that a strictly increasing cdf on I is a multiplicative Archimedean generator if F is log-concave. Therefore, we have the following theorem.
Theorem 4.
If F is a strictly increasing log-concave cdf on I, then
is a copula.
Proof.
Note that the condition that F is log-concave together with the properties of distribution function make F a multiplicative Archimedean generator. Hence, the result follows. □
Also, if F is a cdf on I then also a cdf. Therefore, we can get a multiplicative Archimedean generator using . This result is stated in the following theorem.
Theorem 5.
Let F be a continuous strictly increasing cdf on I with density . Suppose that is increasing on I then the function
is a copula.
Proof.
As F is cdf on I then is also a cdf on I. Therefore, from Theorem 4, is multiplicative Archimedean generator if is log-concave. But
Thus, is log concave if and only if is decreasing or equivalently is increasing. □
Example 2.
Consider the case of Gumbel distribution restricted to I, where . It is easy to check that is increasing. Thus, is multiplicative Archimedean generator, with the corresponding copula
Figure 3.
Copula 3 with parameter .
Figure 4.
The density of Copula 3 with parameter .
Example 3.
Consider the density of Beta distribution with . This density satisfies is increasing. Then, the inverse of the cdf is a multiplicative Archimedean generator. Hence, the corresponding multiplicative Archimedean copula is
This is known, in literature, as Joe copula.
Example 4.
Consider the distribution function discussed in Example 1, as . It can be easily verified that is log concave, also for , is increasing in I. We have . Therefore, the two multiplicative Archimedean copulas corresponding to Theorem 4 and Theorem 5, respectively, are
and
The first copula is the well-known Frank copula with positive dependence parameter, while the second one is a new copula. The pdf of is given by
Figure 5 and Figure 6, give plots of the new copula and its density, respectively. It appears from the graph that this copula is decreasing in θ.
Figure 5.
Copula 4 with parameter .
Figure 6.
The density of Copula 4 with parameter .
As applications of the cdf criteria to define copulas, we listed in Table A1, Table A2 and Table A3 of the Appendix A some well-known copulas with their corresponding generators.
4. Probability Generating Functions as Multiplicative Archimedean Generators
Probability generating functions (pgfs) are quite important tools due to their numerous uses. Mainly, the pgf could be used to drive the probability mass function for all possible values of the random variable and their moments. Moreover, a discrete random variable is totally determined by its pgf. For some cases, the use of pgf gives easy way to drive the distribution of the sum of two independent discrete random variables. Here, we demonstrate the use of pgfs as a class of multiplicative Archimedean generators. A sufficient condition for pgf to be a multiplicative Archimedean generator is given in terms of its probability mass function. Some well-known copulas and new ones are derived using pgfs. At first, we will present some preliminary definitions and related properties.
Definition 5.
Let X be a discrete random variable with distribution . Then the probability generating function (pgf) G of X is defined by
where .
Note that, , and ; i.e., G is absolutely monotonic function on I. Hence, it is strictly increasing convex distribution function in I with jump at zero. However, in the case , we may overcome this obstacle, if it is needed, by considering or . It is obvious that and are both continuous distribution functions on I. While implies that is continuous, strictly increasing function, with and . Then based on Theorem 4, we have the following theorem
Theorem 6.
If a pgf G is log-concave then the function
is a copula.
Note that, if , then, , but .
Example 5.
Consider the pgf for zero-truncated Poisson distribution . Then its inverse is .
Thus, applying Theorem 6, the corresponding copula is
This is known as Frank copula with negative dependence parameter.
Before proceeding to the next theorem which discusses the condition on a pgf to be log-concave, there is need to define the following terms.
Definition 6.
A non-negative sequence is log-concave if
The condition of log-concavity could be rephrased as: For the ratio is decreasing whenever . In general, the pgf is not log-concave. Keilson [10] discussed the relationship between the log-concavity of probability sequence and its generating function. Here, we try to give a sufficient condition on for the log-concavity of the corresponding pgf. We need the following definitions.
Definition 7.
A non-negative sequence is ultra-log-concave if
An equivalent condition is that, for the ratio is decreasing whenever . Note that, an ultra-log-concavity implies log-concavity. For more discussion, see the review paper [11].
The following theorem gives a sufficient condition for a pgf to be log-concave in terms of the corresponding probabilities.
Theorem 7.
Let G be a pgf of . If is ultra-log-concave, then G is log-concave.
Proof.
For proof see Appendix A. □
Remark 1.
Notice that the ultra-log-concavity condition in Theorem 7 cannot be replaced by log-concavity. Here is a simple illustrative example, let X be a discrete random variable having geometric distribution with parameter p. Note , and hence is log-concave (log-convex) sequence. However, the ultra-log-concavity condition is not applicable. Whereas its pgf is not log-concave (it is log-convex).
The next theorem considers the inverse of pgf as a multiplicative Archimedean generator.
Theorem 8.
If , then is a strict multiplicative Archimedean generator. i.e.
is a copula.
Proof.
It is clear that the function is
- Continuous on I.
- Strictly increasing on I.
- and .
- Log-concave. Because we have decreasing. Since both and are increasing.
Hence, Theorem 5, gives the result. □
Example 6.
Consider the pgf in Example 5. For easy notation, we set , i.e. . Therefore, , and hence, . Thus, applying Theorem 8, one gets the corresponding copula as
Figure 7.
Copula 5 with parameter .
Figure 8.
The density of Copula 5 with parameter .
Now consider the function . Then, W is decreasing and convex. Also, and . Thus, it is a non-strict additive Archimedean generator. Hence, we can get the following result as an immediate consequence of Corollary 1.
Corollary 2.
If G is a pgf with , then is an additive Archimedean generator with the corresponding copula
Example 7.
Consider the pgf of truncated Poisson distribution . Then, , which is the same as survival function of truncated exponential discussed in Example 1.
In Table A4 of the Appendix, we listed some well-known copulas with their corresponding generating pgfs.
5. Conclusions
In this paper, we viewed a cumulative distribution function and probability generating function as Archimedean generators. Sufficient conditions in terms of probability function were discussed. Some new copulas were given.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.A. and W.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A. and W.A.; writing—review and editing, A.A. and W.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Deanship of scientific research in King Saud University for funding and supporting this research through the initiative of DSR Graduate Students Research Support (GSR).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Appendix A
Definition A1.
A non-negative function K on , where , is totally positive of order two if for all with
(See [9]).
An important consequence of property is the variation-diminishing property.
Theorem A1
(Variation-diminishing property). Suppose , is function and changes sign times. Let
an absolutely convergent integral with μ a σ-finite measure. Then changes sign at most j times. Moreover, if actually changes sign j times, then must have the same arrangement of signs as does as x and y traverse their respective domains from left to right. (See [12]).
Proof of Theorem 7.
Note that, for every constant :
Now, if is ultra-log-concave, then is decreasing function. Hence, the sequence has at most one sign change, from + to − if one occurs. Since the function is in s and n, it follows from (A1) that has at most one sign change, from + to − if one occurs. Therefore, is decreasing in s and hence is log-concave. □
Table A1.
Some copulas generated by survival functions .
Table A1.
Some copulas generated by survival functions .
| Distribution | Generator | Parameter | Copula |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | |||
| Beta | |||
| Truncated BetaPrim | |||
| Exponential-Logarithmic |
Table A2.
Some copulas generated by .
Table A2.
Some copulas generated by .
| Distribution | Generator | Parameter | Copula |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | |||
| Beta |
Table A3.
Some copulas generated by inverses of distribution functions .
Table A3.
Some copulas generated by inverses of distribution functions .
| Distribution | Generator | Parameter | Copula |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | |||
| Lomax |
Table A4.
Some famous copulas generated by probability generating functions and their inverses.
Table A4.
Some famous copulas generated by probability generating functions and their inverses.
| Distribution | Generator | Parameter | Copula |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binomial | |||
| Geometric | |||
| Poisson | |||
| Truncated Poisson | |||
| Pascal | Integer |
References
- Sklar, M. Fonctions de Repartition an Dimensions et leurs Marges. Publ. L’Institut Stat. L’Universite Paris 1959, 8, 229–231. [Google Scholar]
- Georges, P.; Lamy, A.G.; Nicolas, E.; Quibel, G.; Roncalli, T. Multivariate Survival Modelling: A Unified Approach with Copulas. SSRN Electron. J. 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Genest, C.; MacKay, R.J. Copules Archimédiennes et Families de Lois Bidimensionnelles dont les Marges sont Données. Can. J. Stat. 1986, 14, 145–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marshall, A.W.; Olkin, I. Families of Multivariate Distributions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1988, 83, 834–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frank, M.J. On the Simultaneous Associativity of F(x,y) and x+y-F(x,y). Aequationes Math. 1979, 19, 194–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clayton, D.G. A Model for Association in Bivariate Life Tables and Its Application in Epidemiological Studies of Familial Tendency in Chronic Disease Incidence. Biometrika 1978, 65, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M.M.; Mikhail, N.; Haq, M.S. A Class of Bivariate Distributions Including the Bivariate Logistic. J. Multivar. Anal. 1978, 8, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trivedi, P.K.; Zimmer, D.M. Copula Modeling: An Introduction for Practitioners; Now Publishers Inc.: Breda, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Nelsen, R.B. An Introduction to Copulas; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Keilson, J. A threshold for Log-concavity for Probability Generating Functions and Associated Moment Inequalities. Ann. Math. Stat. 1972, 43, 1702–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saumard, A.; Wellner, J.A. Log-concavity and Strong Log-concavity: A Review. Stat. Surv. 2014, 8, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barlow, R.E.; Proschan, F. Mathematical Theory of Reliability; Siam: Bangkok, Thailand, 1996; Volume 17. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).