1. Introduction
The general second-order linear homogeneous recurrence relation is
Sometimes we call this sequence as a Horadam sequence after the work of Horadam [
1] and is denoted by
. We usually omit the
if it does not cause ambiguity. Let
and
denote the Lucas sequence of the first kind and the second kind, respectively, which are defined by
Fibonacci numbers , Lucas numbers , Pell numbers , Pell–Lucas numbers , Jacobsthal numbers , and Jacobsthal–Lucas numbers are some most famous particular cases of Lucas sequences.
There are many known connections between tridiagonal matrix determinants and Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. Some examples follow. Strang and Borre [
2] and Strang [
3]:
In this paper, we systematically study the relationship between Horadam sequences and tridiagonal determinants. In fact, we investigate the following
tridiagonal matrices, which we denote
. The elements of
are given by
,
,
,
, where
, and
,
, where
. That is,
We also define the
tridiagonal Toeplitz matrices by
Their corresponding determinants are denoted as
It is clear that, if we write Equation (
1) as our notations, they are
In fact, these results can be covered by our theorems. Horadam sequences have the determinantal representations as follows.
for a positive integer
n and any complex numbers
(see Theorem 1).
We use these determinantal representations of
and the basic properties of determinants to get some identities among Horadam sequences. For example (see [
1] [Equation (3.14)]),
Here, we give a new formula.
Note that there is another formula obtained by the author and Pan [
6] [Equation (
10)]. Moreover, since the determinant of a matrix can be found by the product of all its eigenvalues. Cahill, D’Errico, and Spence [
7] used this fact to get the complex factorization of Fibonacci numbers
:
for
. Here, we extend this result to any Horadam sequences. For example, we have
Setting the parameters
and
, we have [
5] [Equation (
3)]
where
are integers and
. In fact, Equation (
8) gives more formulas, including
This paper is organized as follows. In
Section 2, we introduce some basic properties of the determinant
. In
Section 3, we transform
to its corresponding determinant
. Then, we use some properties of determinants to derive some well-known identities among Horadam sequences. In
Section 4, we evaluate the eigenvalues of the matrix
and their corresponding eigenvectors in order to give the complex factorizations of any Horadam sequences. In
Section 5, we give explicitly the complex factorizations of the Lucas sequences of the first kind and the second kind. In
Section 6, we substitute some particular integers into the formulas in
Section 5 to give some expressions among some famous sequences: Fibonacci numbers
, Lucas numbers
, Pell numbers
, and Pell–Lucas numbers
.
2. Preliminaries
We list some basic properties of
:
Since
and
have only one nonzero element in the first row and in the first column, respectively, if we expand them along the row or the column, Equation (
9) will be obtained. Equation (10) is resulted from multiplying the first row or the first column by
.
From the basic operations of determinants, we also have
We evaluate
by using the Laplace expansion along the first row; we have
Applying Equation (
9) to the above identity, we have
On the other hand, if we evaluate
by using the Laplace expansion from the bottom, we have the recurrence relation:
All the above determinant properties are basic (see [
2,
3]); we only use our notations to represent them, which is convenient for the subsequent use of this paper.
Lemma 1. If and , then Proof. Using Equation (
14) and
, we have
Then, we use induction on
n to prove that
. For the trivial case
and
. For
, we assume that this identity is true for
and
. Applying the recurrence relation Equation (
15), we have
□
Using this lemma, we can transform to a symmetric tridiagonal determinant or a skew-symmetric tridiagonal determinant .
We reduce the order n of by the following identity.
Lemma 2. For any positive integer n, Proof. If
, then we multiply
a to the second row.
Multiplying
to the first row and adding it to the second row:
Expanding the determinant along the first column, we have the desired formula.
If
, we use Equation (
14) and get
On the other hand, we use Equation (
9) and get
Therefore, we get Equation (
17). □
The following is a quick result of the above theorem.
Corollary 1. For any positive integer n, 3. Some Properties of Horadam Sequences
Theorem 1. In particular, if we set in the above identity, then Proof. First, we observe that the values
Therefore, these two sequences
and
have the same initial values. Using Equation (
15), we have the recurrence relation of the sequence
:
It appears that the sequence
has the same recurrence relation with
. Thus, for all integer
,
The particular identities are substituted by
and Equation (
17) is applied to the above determinant. □
Using Equation (
20), we can get the determinantal representations of the sequence
and
.
Applying Equations (
14) and (
21), we have the well-known identity [
1] [Equation (2.14)]
Proposition 1. For any nonnegative integer n, we have Proof. Using Equation (
20) and Lemma 1, we get
Now, we substitute
into the recurrence relation of the sequence
.
Therefore, the sequence
satisfies the recurrence relation:
The initial values
and
Again, if we use Equation (
20) and Lemma 1, then we have
This completes our proof. □
Note that there is another formula obtained by the author and Pan [
6] [see Equation (
10)]:
We list the formulas of the sequences
and
(see [
1] [Equation (2.17), (2.19)]):
Proposition 2. Given a sequence , where are arbitrary complex numbers, and n is an integer, for any integer with , we have Proof. Using Equation (
17), we have
Continuing this process, we reach
□
Using some basic operations of determinants and Equation (
30), we can easily get the following properties among the sequences
and
.
Proposition 3. For a positive integer n, we have Proof. Since we use the methods similarly, we only state how to obtain Equations (
32) and (35). Applying Equation (
30), we have
where
. Therefore,
This is Equation (
32). Applying Equation (
30) to
and
, we have
This completes our proof. □
These identities are generalizations of the well-known formulas between
and
(see [
8] [Equations (5.14–16)]):
We derive one more identity (see [
1] [Equation (3.14)]) at the end of this section.
Proposition 4. For a positive integer n, we have Proof. We write the numbers and as their corresponding determinantal forms of order n.
Using Equation (
30), the last term of the above identities becomes
. □
4. Eigenvalues of
We assume that the sequence is a nontrivial second-order linear sequence, that is the parameters a and b are not both zeroes, and .
If
, then
. Thus, we use Equation (
17) to transform the determinant form of
to the special form
:
Therefore, if we want to investigate the complex factorizations of any Horadam sequences, we only need to investigate the eigenvalues of the special matrix form .
Theorem 2. For any integer and any complex numbers with , the eigenvalues of are for ,with an associated eigenvectorwhere the parameter satisfies the conditions: , for any and Proof. Let
be an eigenvalue of the matrix
with an associated eigenvector
. The equations of
are
We let
. Then, the sequence
satisfies
for
, and
, where
,
, for any nonnegative integer
. Note that
, since, if
, then
(the zero vector), which contradicts with the definition of an eigenvector.
Let
be the ordinary generating function of the sequence
. Multiplying
and summing up
k from zero to infinity, we get
Since
, we get an expression of
from the above identity:
Let
be the two roots of
, where
. If
, then
and the Vieta’s formula gives
We rewrite the right-hand side of Equation (
42) as a power series expansion.
Comparing the coefficient of
, we have
Since
and
, we get
This formula must be valid for any
, which implies that
However, this contradicts with the fact
. Therefore,
. The roots
, and we also have the Vieta’s formula:
From this assumption, we know that
By the method of partial fractions, we rewrite the form of
in Equation (
42) as follows.
Using De Moivre’s theorem, we get
Comparing the coefficients of
, for
, we have
Since
, we can rule out this factor from the first identity. Then,
This gives the restriction of
that
, for any
. Since
, the last identity of Equation (
45) gives the other restriction on
:
Furthermore, if we set
, then for
,
These numbers,
,
, form an associated eigenvector corresponding with the eigenvalue
. Since the determinant of a matrix can be found by the product of all its eigenvalues, we have
□
In general, the roots
in Equation (
39) are not easy to solve. To give some applications of Theorem 2, we discuss three particular cases: (1)
; (2)
; and (3)
. Firstly, if
, then Equation (
39) becomes
Since
, for any
, the roots are
Therefore, all the
n eigenvalues of
are
where
. Secondly, if
, then Equation (
39) becomes
Since , for any , the factor . This implies that .
All the
n eigenvalues of
are
where
. Thirdly, if
, then Equation (
39) becomes
Since
, for any
, the factor
. This implies that
. Therefore,
All the
n eigenvalues of
are
where
. We apply these three results to evaluate their corresponding determinants.
Proposition 5. Let be any complex numbers, with , and n be any positive integer. Then, we have 5. Complex Factorizations of Some Lucas Sequences
When we deal with the complex factorizations of
, it is hard to solve
from Equation (
39) explicitly. Thus, we use another method to settle these factorizations.
The Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind
are defined by
In fact, we can write the sequence
as
Rivlin [
9] showed that, if we set
, then
Therefore, the roots of
are given by
Please note that some methods of orthogonal polynomial sequences based on matrix calculus have recently been proposed (see [
10,
11] and references therein).
Lemma 3. The eigenvalues of of are Proof. The eigenvalues of
of
are the solutions of
From Equation (
53), we know that
are solutions of
Using Equation (
54), we have
This gives all explicit values of , for . □
Theorem 3. For and , Proof. Since
, we apply Lemma 1 and Equation (10) to the following determinant.
Applying
into the above identity, we have
Using Lemma 3, we know that the eigenvalues of
are
Hence, all the eigenvalues of
are
This completes our proof. □
For any sequence
, a subsequence
with indices in an arithmetic sequence is again a second-order recurrence sequence (see [
6] [Lemma 8]). Moreover,
We use the fact (see [
1] [Equation (4.10)]) that
and Equation (10) in the above identity.
Moreover, we can apply Equation (
49) and
to give a complex factorization of
.
Proposition 6. For any integers with , the subsequence has the following determinantal representation and a complex factorization: Using Equation (
57), the subsequence
can be handled by the following process.
We use the fact that [
1] [Equation (4.13)]
and Equation (10) in the above identity.
Moreover, we can apply Equations (50) and (51) to give a complex factorization of .
Proposition 7. For any integers with , the subsequence has the following determinantal representation and a complex factorization: Now, we deal the subsequences of
. Firstly, we consider the subsequence
. From Equation (
57), we have
We apply Theorem 3 to the above identity and we can give a complex factorization of as follows.
Proposition 8. For any integers with , the subsequence has the following determinantal representation and a complex factorization: Using Equation (
57), the subsequence
can be handled by the following process.
We use the fact the ([
1], Equation (4.14))
and Equation (10) in the above identity.
Moreover, we can apply Equations (50) and (51) to give a complex factorization of .
Proposition 9. For any integers with , the subsequence has the following determinantal representation and a complex factorization: 6. Some Applications and Concluding Remarks
In this section, we give some applications on some famous sequences: Fibonacci numbers , Lucas numbers , Pell numbers , and Pell–Lucas numbers .
Firstly, we give the applications of Proposition 6. Let
,
in Equation (
58) where
, we have (see [
5] [Equation (
3)])
We find that
in [
3] and we list the complex factorization with
in the above identity (note that
):
Let
,
in Equation (
58), where
; we have
We find that
in [
2,
4]. We list two identities with
and
:
If we set
, then
and
. Substituting these parameters into Equation (
58), we have
Here, we list the representations for
and
:
Secondly, we give the applications of Proposition 7. Let
and
k be an even or odd integer in Equation (
60); we have the identities among Fibonacci numbers:
We find that
appeared in [
3] and we list the representations for
and
:
If we change the values of the parameters
p and
q to
,
. Then, Equation (
60) becomes
We list the representations of
and
:
Thirdly, we give the applications of Proposition 8. Let
in Equation (
61); we have the identities among Lucas numbers:
We find that
in [
7] [Equation (3.3)] and also its complex factorization in [
7] [Equation (1.2)]. Note that, by Lemma 1 and Equation (10), we know that the determinant is equivalent to our determinant form
. The following we list the representations of
and
:
Now, we consider the Pell–Lucas numbers
, that is, we set
,
in Equation (
61).
We list the representations of
and
.
At last, we give the applications of Proposition 9. Let
in Equation (
62), we have the identities among Lucas numbers:
We list the representations of
and
.
Setting
in Equation (
62), we have
The representations of
and
are
Cahill and Narayan [
5] constructed two families of tridiagonal matrices whose determinants are
and
. The
symmetric tridiagonal matrices
M whose elements are given by
,
,
,
, where
,
, where
. That is
Maybe we can say that they use three layers at the top-left of the matrix. There are two layers at the top-left in our matrix
. Using a similar spirit as our notations, we may write their results as follows. (see [
5] [Theorem 2–3])
where
. In this paper, we get simpler forms of the values
and
.
Note that, if we allow
k and
t being all integers, our evaluations also cover all results in [
12]. However, we think that, if we use three layers forms
, then we might be able to deal with more complicated cases. However, this is another story.