Abstract
The Hosoya index of a graph is defined by the total number of the matchings of the graph. In this paper, we determine the maximum Hosoya index of unicyclic graphs with n vertices and diameter 3 or 4. Our results somewhat answer a question proposed by Wagner and Gutman in 2010 for unicyclic graphs with small diameter.
1. Introduction
Numerous topological and chemical indices/measures have been used for analyzing molecular graphs [1,2,3,4]. A prominent example is the Hosoya index introduced by Hosoya [5] in 1971 as a molecular-graph based structure descriptor. Hosoya discovered that certain physico-chemical properties of alkanes (= saturated hydrocarbons)—in particular, their boiling points—are well correlated with this index. Gutman et al. further considered it in the chemical view [6]. As is known, structural graph descriptors have been investigated extensively in chemistry, drug design and related disciplines [1,2,3,4].
The Hosoya index got much attention by many researchers in the past decades. They have been interested in identifying the maximum or minimum value of Hosoya index for various classes of graphs (with certain restrictions), such as trees [7,8,9], unicyclic graphs [10,11,12,13,14], bicyclic graphs [15] and so on. For an exhaustive survey for this topic, we refer to [16].
Even though there is a considerable amount of literature on the topic of maximizing or minimizing the Hosoya index, there are still many interesting open questions left. In [16], it is mentioned that:
- -
- It seems to be difficult to obtain results of the maximum Hosoya index among trees with a given number of leaves or given diameter. However, partial results are available, so the problem might not be totally intractable, and results in this direction would definitely be interesting.
- -
- If the aforementioned questions can be answered for trees, then it is also natural to consider the analogous questions for treelike graphs (such as unicyclic graphs).
For two vertices in a graph G, the distance between u and v is the length of a shortest path connecting them. The diameter of G is . Confirming a conjecture proposed by Ou [12], Liu [8] considered the maximum Hosoya index of trees with diameter 4. Motivated by this line of research, we here consider the maximal Hosoya index of unicyclic graphs with small diameter. It seems that unicyclic graphs are only one more edge than trees, however, some of their properties change drastically such as the girth.
At the end of this section, we define some notation as well as some preliminary results that we frequently use in the sequel.
Let G be a simple connected graph with vertex set . For , we denote its neighborhood by , and denote . A pendent vertex is a vertex of degree 1. For two vertices and , the distance between and is the number of edges in a shortest path joining and . We use to denote the graph that arises from G by deleting the vertex . For other undefined notations, we refer to [17].
Given a molecular graph G, let be the number of k matchings of G. It would be convenient to define The Hosoya index is defined as the number of subsets of in which no edges are incident, in other words, the total number of the matchings of the graph G. Then,
For the star of order , when , we have . Then, .
The double star is a tree of order n obtained from and , by identifying a pendent vertex of with the center of , where . For , when , we have , therefore
The following two lemmas are needed in this paper, which can be found on page 337 of [16].
Lemma 1.
Let G be a graph and v be a vertex of G. Then,
Lemma 2.
If are the components of a graph G, then
For , the unique unicyclic graph with diameter two is obtained from the star by adding an edge. For unicyclic graphs with diameter at least 5, things become more complicated, and we believe more techniques are needed. Thus, we only consider the cases for diameter 3 and 4. In Section 2, we determine the maximal Hosoya index of unicyclic graphs with n vertices and diameter 3 (see Theorem 5). In Section 3, we determine the maximal Hosoya index of unicyclic graphs with n vertices and diameter 4 (see Theorem 15).
2. The Unicyclic Graphs with Diameter 3
In this section, we study the maximal Hosoya index of unicyclic graphs with n vertices and diameter 3.
Let be the set of all unicyclic graphs with n vertices and diameter 3. According to the length of the unique cycle and the distribution of other vertices, we may classify all the members in . Let be the set of unicyclic graph of the form , . It is easy to see that the graphs from , , , and , and , , and are all unicyclic graphs with diameter 3.
Let be the set of unicyclic graphs of the form (as depicted in Figure 1), where , and at least two of are greater than 2. Let be the graph of the form satisfying almost equal (hereafter “almost equal” means the difference of any two numbers is at most one).
Figure 1.
Four unicyclic graphs with diameter 3.
Theorem 1.
The graph has the maximum Hosoya index among all graphs in .
Proof.
Assume with . By Lemmas 1 and 2, we obtain
where y is one of pendent vertex adjacent to in .
If , then we get
As have the same status as shown in the graph, we conclude that, when are almost equal, has the maximal Hosoya index. □
Let be the set of unicyclic graphs of the form (as depicted in Figure 1), where , . Let be the graph of the form satisfying .
Theorem 2.
The graph has the maximum Hosoya index among all graphs in .
Proof.
Assume . By Lemmas 1 and 2, we obtain
where y is one of pendent vertexs adjacent to in .
If , then we get
If , then we get
Thus, we obtain the result. □
Let be the set of unicyclic graph of the form (as depicted in Figure 1), where and are two vertices with , pendent vertices satisfying , one of a and b is at least 2. Let be the graph of the form satisfying almost equal.
Theorem 3.
The graph has the maximum Hosoya index among all graphs in .
Proof.
For with , by Lemmas 1 and 2, we obtain
where y is one of pendent vertex adjacent to in .
If , then we get
Therefore, when a and b are almost equal, has the maximal Hosoya index. □
Let be the set of unicyclic graphs of the form (as depicted in Figure 1), where and are two vertices with , pendent vertices, respectively, , . Let be the graph of the form satisfying .
Theorem 4.
The graph has the maximum Hosoya index among all graphs in .
Proof.
Assume with . By Lemmas 1 and 2, we obtain
where is a pendent vertex adjacent to , y is a pendent vertex adjacent to .
If , then we get
This implies the result. □
Theorem 5.
The graph has the maximum Hosoya index among all graphs in if .
Proof.
We only need to compare the Hosoya indices of for .
For , we assume that . As are almost equal and , then we have . Thus,
For , as and , we have and thus . Thus
The last inequality holds for a function that is strictly increasing for .
For , as are almost equal and , then we have
For , as are almost equal and , then we have
By using the software “Mathematica”, we see for , for A direct computation yields to .
From above, we obtain the result. □
3. The Unicyclic Graphs with Diameter 4
In this section, we aim to determine the maximal Hosoya index of unicyclic graphs with n vertices and diameter 4.
Let be the set of all unicyclic graphs with n vertices and diameter 4. According to the length of the unique cycle and the distribution of other vertices, we may classify all the members in . Let be the set of unicyclic graphs of the form , . It is easy to see that the graphs from , , , , , , , , and and two cycles and are all members of the unicyclic graphs with diameter 4.
Let be the set of unicyclic graphs of the form (as depicted in Figure 2), where , , and are three vertices with , , and pendent vertices, , . Let be the graph of the form satisfying .
Figure 2.
Eight unicyclic graphs with diameter 4.
Theorem 6.
The graph has the maximum Hosoya index among all graphs in .
Proof.
For , by Lemmas 1 and 2, we have
where y is one pendent vertex adjacent to in .
Case 1. If , then
Case 2. If , then
Cases 1 and 2 imply that, if has maximum Hosoya index, then we infer .
Case 3. If , then
Case 4. If , then
Cases 3 and 4 imply that, if has maximum Hosoya index, then we infer .
Case 5. If , then
Case 6. If , then
Cases 5 and 6 imply that if has maximum Hosoya index, then we infer are almost equal.
From the above, we get the result. □
Let be the set of unicyclic graphs of the form (as depicted in Figure 2), where , , , and are four vertices with , , , and pendent vertices, respectively, . As the diameter is 4, we infer and one value of c and d is at least 2. Let be the graph of the form satisfying , , .
Theorem 7.
The graph has the maximum Hosoya index among all graphs in .
Proof.
For , by Lemmas 1 and 2, we have
where y is one of pendent vertex adjacent to in .
Case 1. If , then
Case 2. If , we infer
Cases 1 and 2 imply that, if has maximum Hosoya index, then we infer .
Case 3. If , then
Case 4. If , then
Cases 3 and 4 imply that, if has maximum Hosoya index, then infer .
Case 5. If , then
Case 6. If , then
Cases 5 and 6 imply that, if has maximum Hosoya index, then we infer .
From the above cases, we get the result. □
Let be the set of unicyclic graphs of the form (as depicted in Figure 2), where , , , and are four vertices with , , , and pendent vertices, , . As the diameter is 4, a and c, or b and d, are at least 2. Let be the graph of the form satisfying almost equal.
Theorem 8.
The graph has the maximum Hosoya index among all graphs in .
Proof.
For , by Lemmas 1 and 2, we have
For , by Lemma 1, we have
where y is one pendent vertex adjacent to in .
For , by Lemmas 1 and 2, we have
where w is one of pendent vertex adjacent to in . Therefore,
Case 1. If , then
From Case 1, we have, when a and c are almost equal, has larger Hosoya index. Similarly, as have the same status as shown in the graph, we conclude that, when b and d are almost equal, has larger Hosoya index.
Case 2. If , then
Therefore, from Case 2, when has maximum Hosoya index, we infer that a and b are almost equal, and, similarly, a and d are almost equal.
From Case 1, b and d are almost equal, so a, b and d are almost equal. Similarly, a, b and c are almost equal. Hence, we get are almost equal. □
Let be the set of unicyclic graphs of the form (as depicted in Figure 2), where , , , and are four vertices with , , , and pendent vertices with , . Let be the graph of the form satisfying .
Theorem 9.
The graph has the maximum Hosoya index among all graphs in .
Proof.
For , by Lemmas 1 and 2, we have
For , by Lemma 1, we get
where y is one pendent vertex adjacent to in . For , by Lemmas 1 and 2,
where w is one pendent vertex adjacent to in . Hence, it follows that
Case 1. If , then
Similarly, if , then we have
Cases 1 implies that, if has the maximum Hosoya index, we conclude .
Case 2. If , then
Case 3. If , then
Cases 2 and 3 imply that, if has the maximum Hosoya index, we conclude .
Case 4. If , then
Case 5. If , then
Thus, we have .
Cases 4 and 5 imply that, if has the maximum Hosoya index, we conclude .
All the above cases imply the desired result. □
Let be the set of unicyclic graphs of the form (as depicted in Figure 2), where , , , and are four vertices with , , , and pendent vertices, , and . Let be the graph of the form satisfying .
Theorem 10.
The graph has the maximum Hosoya index among all graphs in .
Proof.
For , by Lemmas 1 and 2,
where y is one pendent vertex adjacent to in .
For , By Lemma 1, we have
where w is one pendent vertex adjacent to in , , and . Therefore,
Case 1. If , then
Case 2. If , this yields to
Cases 1 and 2 imply that, if has the maximum Hosoya index, we infer .
Case 3. If , then
Case 4. If , then
Cases 3 and 4 imply that, if has the maximum Hosoya index, we conclude .
Case 5. If , then
Case 6. If , then
Cases 5 and 6 imply that, if has the maximum Hosoya index, we conclude .
From all above, we get the result. □
Let be the set of unicyclic graphs of the form (as depicted in Figure 2), where , , , , and are five vertices with , , , , and pendent vertices, , and . As the diameter is 4, from symmetry, we may assume a and c, or a and d, are at least 2. Let be the graph of the form satisfying almost equal.
Theorem 11.
The graph has the maximum Hosoya index among all graphs in .
Proof.
For , by Lemmas 1 and 2, we have
where y is one pendent vertex adjacent to in .
For , by Lemma 1, we have
where is one pendent vertex adjacent to in , is one pendent vertex adjacent to , , and
Therefore, we obtain
If , let be the graph obtained from by removing a pendent edge at to . Then, we get
As have the same status as depicted in Figure 2, we obtain that, when are almost equal, has the maximal Hosoya index. □
Let be the set of unicyclic graphs of the form (as depicted in Figure 2), where , , and are three vertices with , , and pendent vertices, , , and one of is at least 2. Let be the graph of the form satisfying almost equal.
Theorem 12.
The graph has the maximum Hosoya index among all graphs in .
Proof.
For , by Lemmas 1 and 2, we have
where is one pendent vertex adjacent to in .
For , by Lemma 1, we have
where is one pendent vertex adjacent to , is one pendent vertex adjacent to in , , and
Therefore, we obtain
Case 1. If , then
Case 2. If , then we conclude
Cases 1 and 2 imply that, if has the maximum Hosoya index, we conclude . Similarly, by using symmetry, we may obtain .
Case 3. If , then
Case 4. If , then get
Cases 3 and 4 imply that, if has the maximum Hosoya index, we conclude .
In conclusion, when are almost equal, has the maximal Hosoya index. □
Let be the set of unicyclic graphs of the form (as depicted in Figure 2), where , , and are three vertices with , , and pendent vertices, , , NS one of is at least 2. Let be the graph of the form satisfying almost equal.
Theorem 13.
The graph has the maximum Hosoya index among all graphs in .
Proof.
For , by Lemmas 1 and 2, we have
where is one pendent vertex adjacent to in .
For , by Lemma 1, we have
where is one pendent vertex adjacent to in , is one pendent vertex adjacent to in , , and
Therefore,
Case 1. If , then
Case 2. If , then
Cases 1 and 2 imply that, if has the maximum Hosoya index, we conclude . Similarly, we obtain .
Case 3. If , then
Case 4. If , then we have
Cases 3 and 4 imply that, if has the maximum Hosoya index, we conclude .
In conclusion, when are almost equal, has the maximal Hosoya index. □
Let be the set of unicyclic graphs of the form (as depicted in Figure 2), where , , and are three vertices with , , and pendent vertices, , , and one of is at least 2. Let be the graph of the form satisfying almost equal.
Theorem 14.
The graph has the maximum Hosoya index among all graphs in .
Proof.
For , from Lemmas 1 and 2, we have
For , by Lemmas 1 and 2, we have
Here, x is a pendent vertex attached at .
Observe that ,
where y is one pendent vertex attached at .
Thus, we obtain
If , then we have
Thus, we have .
This implies that, if has the maximum Hosoya index, we conclude .
As (resp. a, c) have the same status as shown in Figure 2, we also have . . This is the desired result. □
Theorem 15.
The graph has the maximum Hosoya index among all graphs in for .
Proof.
We need only compare for .
For , as , we have , and . Since , we get , this leads to . Therefore,
The last inequality holds for a function that is strictly increasing for .
For , we have , , . We may assume without loss of generality. Then, , and . Thus, , and hence . Therefore,
The last inequality holds for a function that is strictly increasing for .
For , as are almost equal and , we have
For , . We may assume without loss of generality. Then, , and . Thus, , and hence . Therefore,
The last inequality holds for a function that is strictly increasing for .
For , . We may assume without loss of generality. Then, , and . Thus, , and hence . Therefore,
The last inequality holds for a function that is strictly increasing for .
For , are almost equal. Then, as . Therefore,
For , are almost equal. We may assume . Then, we have , and . Thus, , and hence . Therefore,
The last inequality holds for a function which is strictly increasing for .
Let , are almost equal. We may assume . Then, we have , and . Thus, , and hence . Therefore,
The last inequality holds for a function is strictly increasing for .
For , since are almost equal, We may assume . Then , . As , therefore . Thus, we have
The last inequality holds as is strictly increasing for .
By using the software “Mathematica”, we obtain the following comparison.
for .
for .
for .
for .
for .
The direct computation yields to .
From the above discussion, we get the result. □
4. Summary and Conclusions
In this paper, we investigate extremal properties of the famous Hosoya index for unicyclic graphs with diameter at most four. There is no doubt that topological indices have been proven useful for analyzing molecules by means of their graph structure. Especially the Hosoya index is demanding to calculate for general graphs. Thus, special analytical results for the Hosoya index contribute to a better understanding of molecular topology when using this measure. Because of the problem of calculating the Hosoya index efficiently, we also believe that our results can be used for QSAR/QSPR problems. Moreover, the Hosoya index could be calculated on existing drugbanks to determine the value distributions and using them within QSAR/QSPR. Note that this index has a meaningful structural interpretation. As future work, we would like to continue to prove analytical results when establishing interrelations between the Hosoya index and known graph measures which have been proven useful for drug design and QSAR/QSPR.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, W.L., J.B., L.F., F.E.-S. and M.D.; investigation, W.L. and M.D.; data curation, F.E.-S. and T.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.D.; L.F. and J.B.; writing—review and editing, J.B., L.F., F.E.-S. and M.D.; supervision, J.B., L.F. and M.D.; project administration, M.D.
Funding
This research was supported by NSFC (Nos. 11671402 and 11871479) (L.F. and W.L.), Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2016JJ2138 and 2018JJ2479) (L.F. and W.L.) and Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences Project of CSU (L.F. and W.L.). NSFC (No. 11701339) (T.C.), the Austrian Science Fund for financial support (P 33001) (M.D.).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Basak, S.C. Information-theoretic indices of neighborhood complexity and their applications. In Topological Indices and Related Descriptors in QSAR and QSPR; Balaban, A.T., Devillers, J., Eds.; Gordon and Breach Science Publishers: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999; pp. 563–595. [Google Scholar]
- Basak, S.C.; Gute, B.D.; Balaban, A.T. Interrelationship of major topological indices evidenced by clustering. Croat. Chem. Acta 2014, 77, 331–344. [Google Scholar]
- Basak, S.; Magnuson, V.R. Molecular topology and narcosis. Arzeim. Forsch. Drug Des. 1983, 33, 501–503. [Google Scholar]
- Todeschini, R.; Consonni, V.; Mannhold, R. Handbook of Molecular Descriptors; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Hosoya, H. Topological index. A newly proposed quantity characterizing the topological nature of structural isomers of saturated hydrocarbons. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1971, 44, 2332–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutman, I.; Hosoya, H.; Uraković, G.; Ristić, L. Two variants of the topological index and the relations between them. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1992, 65, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, Y. On acyclic systems with minimal Hosoya index. Discret. Appl. Math. 2002, 119, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H. The proof of a conjecture concerning acyclic molecular graphs with maximal Hosoya index and diameter 4. J. Math. Chem. 2008, 43, 1199–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagner, S. Extremal trees with respect to Hosoya index and Merrifield-Simmons index. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2007, 57, 221–233. [Google Scholar]
- Deng, H.; Chen, S. The extremal unicyclic graphs with respect to Hosoya index and Merrifield-Simmons index. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2008, 59, 171–190. [Google Scholar]
- Hua, H. Hosoya index of unicyclic graphs with prescribed pendent vertices. J. Math. Chem. 2008, 43, 831–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ou, J. On extremal unicyclic molecular graphs with prescribed girth and minimal Hosoya index. J. Math. Chem. 2007, 42, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, K.; Xu, B. Some extremal unicyclic graphs with respect to Hosoya index and Merrifield-Simmons index. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2009, 62, 629–648. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, G.; Feng, L.; Ilić, A. The largest n − 1 Hosoya indices of unicyclic graphs. Filomat 2016, 30, 2573–2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, H. The largest Hosoya index of (n, n + 1)-graphs. Comput. Math. Appl. 2006, 56, 2499–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagner, S.; Gutman, I. Maxima and minima of the Hosoya index and the Merrifield-Simmons index: A survey of results and techniques. Acta Appl. Math. 2010, 112, 323–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bollobás, B. Modern Graph Theory; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).