Next Article in Journal
Ways Forward for Advancing Ecosystem Services in Municipal Planning—Experiences from Stockholm County
Next Article in Special Issue
Understanding the Importance of Dynamic Landscape Connectivity
Previous Article in Journal
Integrating Ecosystem Services and Disservices in Valuing Smallholder Livestock and Poultry Production in Three Villages in South Africa
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Landscape Connectivity and Ecological Network Construction in Long Yangxia Basin at the Upper Yellow River
Article

Supporting Adaptive Connectivity in Dynamic Landscapes

1
Biology Department, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182-4614, USA
2
Institute for Ecological Monitoring and Management, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-4614, USA
3
Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute, Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Missoula, MT 59801, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2020, 9(9), 295; https://doi.org/10.3390/land9090295
Received: 28 July 2020 / Revised: 23 August 2020 / Accepted: 25 August 2020 / Published: 26 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dynamic Landscape Connectivity)
A central tenet of landscape conservation planning is that natural communities can be supported by a connected landscape network that supports many species and habitat types. However, as the planning environment, ecological conditions, and risks and stressors change over time, the areas needed to support landscape connectivity may also shift. We demonstrate an approach designed to assess functional and structural connectivity of an established protected area network that has experienced landscape and planning changes over time. Here we present an approach designed to inform adaptive planning for connectivity with a complementary suite of analytical techniques. Using existing occurrence, movement, and genetic data for six focal species, we create a spatially explicit connectivity assessment based on landscape resistance, paired with a landscape feature geodiversity analysis. Although factors such as cost, conservation goals, and land management strategies must be taken into account, this approach provides a template for leveraging available empirical data and robust analyses to evaluate and adapt planning for protected area networks that can preserve and promote both functional and structural connectivity in dynamic landscapes. View Full-Text
Keywords: corridor; dynamic connectivity; ecological network; focal species; land facet; landscape conservation; linkage; multi-species corridor; dynamic connectivity; ecological network; focal species; land facet; landscape conservation; linkage; multi-species
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Jennings, M.K.; Zeller, K.A.; Lewison, R.L. Supporting Adaptive Connectivity in Dynamic Landscapes. Land 2020, 9, 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9090295

AMA Style

Jennings MK, Zeller KA, Lewison RL. Supporting Adaptive Connectivity in Dynamic Landscapes. Land. 2020; 9(9):295. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9090295

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jennings, Megan K., Katherine A. Zeller, and Rebecca L. Lewison. 2020. "Supporting Adaptive Connectivity in Dynamic Landscapes" Land 9, no. 9: 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9090295

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop