Next Article in Journal
Determination of Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Agricultural Land Use in the GAP-Harran Plain of Turkey
Next Article in Special Issue
Local Perceptions of Ecosystem Services Across Multiple Ecosystem Types in Spain
Previous Article in Journal
When Peace and Quiet Is Not Enough: Place-Shaping and the Role of Leaders in Sustainability and Quality of Life in Rural Estonia and Latvia
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Conceptual Framework to Design Green Infrastructure: Ecosystem Services as an Opportunity for Creating Shared Value in Ground Photovoltaic Systems
Open AccessEditor’s ChoiceReview

Measuring Multifunctional Agricultural Landscapes

Department of Geography, Environment and Population, School of Social Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2020, 9(8), 260; https://doi.org/10.3390/land9080260
Received: 15 July 2020 / Revised: 30 July 2020 / Accepted: 31 July 2020 / Published: 3 August 2020
Multifunctional agriculture (MFA) has attracted increased attention from academics and policymakers in recent years. Academic researchers have utilised various approaches to assess and measure the multifunctionality of agriculture and rural landscapes. This paper outlines the nature of MFA and key supporting policies, before reviewing the applied research approaches, drawing primarily from the European Union and China where specific policies on MFA have been implemented to support rural development and promote sustainable rural communities. Four distinct types of valuation of modern MFA are recognised: economic, biophysical, socio-cultural, and holistic. Following a search of both the recent and older MFA literature, evaluations of the strengths and weaknesses of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods applications are provided using examples from a range of recent studies. The review illustrates the diversity of approaches to measure MFA. While noting that many studies operate at a landscape scale, the challenge remains that the lack of commonality in the research approaches applied means it is difficult to provide effective comparisons between studies or to compare findings. A future research agenda will need to emphasise the need for more consideration of the roles of MFA research to support decision-makers, especially policy makers, but also farmers who largely make decisions for individual farms but, if considered collectively, can transform production systems at a landscape scale. View Full-Text
Keywords: multifunctionality; agriculture; landscape; ecosystems; rural development multifunctionality; agriculture; landscape; ecosystems; rural development
MDPI and ACS Style

Song, B.; Robinson, G.M.; Bardsley, D.K. Measuring Multifunctional Agricultural Landscapes. Land 2020, 9, 260.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop