Next Article in Journal
Anthropogenic Biomes: 10,000 BCE to 2015 CE
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of China’s Collective Forestland Tenure Reform Policies on Forest Product Firm Values
Open AccessEditor’s ChoiceArticle

Inclusive Landscape Governance for Sustainable Development: Assessment Methodology and Lessons for Civil Society Organizations

1
Tropenbos International, Wageningen, 6700 AE Gelderland, The Netherlands
2
EcoAgriculture Partners, Washington DC, USA & Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA
3
NTFP-EP Philippines, Quezon City, Metro Manila 1100, Philippines
4
Tropenbos DR Congo, Kisangani, #6, 3ème avenue Plateau Boyoma, Democratic Republic of the Congo
5
Forest Foundation Philippines, Manila, Makati 1229, Philippines
6
Tropenbos Vietnam, Hué 530000, Vietnam
7
Tropenbos Indonesia, Bogor 16163, West Java, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2020, 9(4), 128; https://doi.org/10.3390/land9040128
Received: 31 March 2020 / Revised: 20 April 2020 / Accepted: 21 April 2020 / Published: 24 April 2020
Landscape governance refers to the combination of rules and decision-making processes of civic, private, and public actors with stakes in the landscape, that together shape the future of that landscape. As part of the Green Livelihoods Alliance, a program that supports civil society organizations (CSOs) to strengthen the governance of tropical forested landscapes, we developed and implemented a method that facilitates stakeholders to assess the status of governance in their own landscape and to identify options for improvement. In this article, we aim to reflect on landscape governance, based on our work within the Green Livelihoods Alliance. We present the method, summarize the results of its implementation, and draw practical lessons regarding the role of CSOs to improve landscape governance. We conducted workshops with stakeholders in 17 forested landscapes across 10 countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. During each workshop, participants scored and discussed a set of governance indicators, developed a common vision for landscape governance, and identified the practical steps that would need to be taken to achieve that vision. Analyzing the results from the workshops, we found that landscape stakeholders tend to perceive that: opportunities to influence decision-making are unequal; integrated landscape planning efforts remain noncommittal; and implementation and enforcement of regulations is weak. To improve governance in the future, it is common to call for the development of multi-stakeholder processes, to allow different actors to discuss, negotiate, and develop collaborative action to address landscape-level challenges. CSOs can support such processes, by helping to develop a shared understanding of landscape governance, differences in interests, and possibilities for collaborative action. CSOs can also help stakeholders to develop multi-stakeholder procedures, and build trust and capacity among stakeholders to take an active role in such processes. View Full-Text
Keywords: landscape; governance; assessment; inclusive; sustainable; multi-stakeholder landscape; governance; assessment; inclusive; sustainable; multi-stakeholder
MDPI and ACS Style

Kusters, K.; De Graaf, M.; Buck, L.; Galido, K.; Maindo, A.; Mendoza, H.; Nghi, T.H.; Purwanto, E.; Zagt, R. Inclusive Landscape Governance for Sustainable Development: Assessment Methodology and Lessons for Civil Society Organizations. Land 2020, 9, 128.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop