Next Article in Journal
How Effective Is Spatial Planning for Cropland Protection? An Assessment Based on Land-Use Scenarios
Next Article in Special Issue
A Synopsis of Farmland Abandonment and Its Driving Factors in Nepal
Previous Article in Journal
The Changing Structure and Concentration of Agricultural Land Holdings in Estonia and Possible Threat for Rural Areas
Previous Article in Special Issue
Outmigration and Land-Use Change: A Case Study from the Middle Hills of Nepal
Open AccessArticle

Economic Comparison between Pasture-Based Beef Production and Afforestation of Abandoned Land in Swedish Forest Districts

Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 234, SE-532 23 Skara, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 7 January 2020 / Revised: 31 January 2020 / Accepted: 31 January 2020 / Published: 3 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agricultural Land Abandonment: Patterns, Drivers and Consequences)
Large areas of agricultural land have been abandoned or are at risk of being abandoned such as small scattered fields and pastures in forest-dominated landscapes are unsuitable for modern mechanized agriculture and cost-efficient grazing. These areas have therefore become unprofitable to cultivate and graze. Spruce planting has been seen as the obvious alternative on these lands but is today questioned from landscape points of view. Now most abandoned land is left for natural afforestation. This study aims to compare the profitability in use of abandoned or marginal agricultural land in Swedish forest districts for spruce planting, natural birch afforestation, or organic beef cattle grazing large pasture-forest mosaics. The pastures consist of remaining semi-natural pastures, abandoned and marginal agricultural land, and adjacent forest land. Calculations of contribution to land, management, and risk suggest that, given present supports and environmental payments, organic beef production with herds of more than 20 suckler cows in large pasture-forest mosaics could be more profitable than forestry, except for in the most fertile areas of southern Sweden, where spruce planting has the highest contribution. Future tree breeding progress and possible decrease of livestock-related support and environmental payments would however increase the competitiveness of resumed afforestation relative to beef production. View Full-Text
Keywords: agricultural land; pasture; abandonment; beef; suckler cow; afforestation; forestry; spruce; landscape; climate; profitability agricultural land; pasture; abandonment; beef; suckler cow; afforestation; forestry; spruce; landscape; climate; profitability
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumm, K.-I.; Hessle, A. Economic Comparison between Pasture-Based Beef Production and Afforestation of Abandoned Land in Swedish Forest Districts. Land 2020, 9, 42.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop