Next Article in Journal
REDD+ Implementation in Community-Based Muyong Forest Management in Ifugao, Philippines
Previous Article in Journal
‘Not One More Bloody Acre’: Land Restitution and the Treaty of Waitangi Settlement Process in Aotearoa New Zealand
Previous Article in Special Issue
Towards Responsible Consolidation of Customary Lands: A Research Synthesis
Open AccessArticle

Capitalising on the European Research Outcome for Improved Spatial Planning Practices and Territorial Governance

Institute of Civil Engineering and Real Estate Economics, Riga Technical University, Kalnciema street 6—210, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia
Land 2019, 8(11), 163; https://doi.org/10.3390/land8110163
Received: 24 September 2019 / Revised: 24 October 2019 / Accepted: 31 October 2019 / Published: 1 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Land, Innovation, and Social Good)
If distinguishing between spatial planning systems and practices, the latter reflect on the continuity and perspective of planning cultures and are concerned with the values, attitudes, mindsets and routines shared by those taking part in concrete planning processes. Some recent studies demonstrated comparative assessment of European spatial planning. Thus, the coexistence of continuity and change, as well as convergence and divergence concerning planning practices, was delineated. Moreover, the trends and directions in the evolution of spatial planning and territorial governance were explored when focusing on linkages between diverse national planning perspectives and EU policies. The relevant outcome of European projects met their visionary statements in general and are towards the inspiration of policymaking by territorial evidence. However, it showed a highly differential landscape for territorial governance and spatial planning across Europe in terms of terminology, concepts, tools and practices. Therefore, the paper focuses on how the most relevant outcome of European research may initiate a reasonable in-depth study of concrete planning practices and substantiate an effective planning approach. Mainly based on critical literature review and comparative analysis and synthesis techniques, the overviewed key research results led (1) to agenda-setting for comprehensive evidence gathering (CEG) if exploring spatial planning practices and territorial governance in selected European countries, and (2) to a set of objectives for a values-led planning (VLP) approach to be introduced for improvement of land use management.
Keywords: spatial planning practices; territorial governance; Europe; comprehensive evidence; values-led planning spatial planning practices; territorial governance; Europe; comprehensive evidence; values-led planning
MDPI and ACS Style

Auziņš, A. Capitalising on the European Research Outcome for Improved Spatial Planning Practices and Territorial Governance. Land 2019, 8, 163.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop