Next Article in Journal
Central Place and Liminal Landscape in the Territory of Populonia
Next Article in Special Issue
Fairness and Transparency Are Required for the Inclusion of Privately Protected Areas in Publicly Accessible Conservation Databases
Previous Article in Journal
An Overview of the Impacts of Land Use Land Cover Changes (1980–2014) on Urban Water Security of Kolkata
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tropical Protected Areas Under Increasing Threats from Climate Change and Deforestation
 
 
Article

Setting and Implementing Standards for Management of Wild Tigers

1
WWF Singapore, 354 Tanglin Road, Tanglin Block, Tanglin International Centre, Singapore 247672, Singapore
2
Equilibrium Research, 47 The Quays, Spike Island, Cumberland Road, Bristol BS1 6UQ, UK
3
School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
4
Global Wildlife Conservation, 500 N Capital of Texas Hwy Building 1, Suite 200, Austin, TX 78746, USA
5
International Union for Conservation of Nature, Global Species Programme, Rue Mauverney 28, 1196 Gland, Switzerland
6
Global Tiger Forum, 200, Jor Bagh Road, Third Floor (Near Jor Bagh Metro Station), New Delhi 110003, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 June 2018 / Revised: 25 July 2018 / Accepted: 27 July 2018 / Published: 31 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biodiversity and Protected Areas)
Tiger numbers have collapsed so dramatically that conservationists are adopting a strategy of securing populations in priority conservation landscapes. This includes improving management effectiveness in these sites. The Conservation Assured|Tiger Standards (CA|TS) are designed to help ensure effectiveness and provide a benchmark against which to measure progress. CA|TS is a distillation of best practice and a roadmap to management effectiveness, linking management to expert-driven standards covering all aspects of management, including those which are tiger-specific (monitoring, maintenance of prey, control of poaching). Sites are audited against a set of standards and if met, are accredited as CA|TS Approved. We describe CA|TS in the context of tiger conservation, describe the evolution and philosophy of the system and consider its application across the tiger range, before drawing on lessons learned from 5 years of development. Important benefits include the independence of CA|TS from existing governmental or NGO institutions, the emphasis on regional governance and the existence of active support groups. Conversely, the participatory approach has slowed implementation. CA|TS remains more attractive to well managed sites than to sites that are struggling, although building capacity in the latter is its key aim. The close connections between people working on tiger conservation make some aspects of independent assessment challenging. Finally, if CA|TS is to succeed in its long term aims, it needs to go hand in hand with secure and adequate funding to increase management capacity in many tiger conservation areas. View Full-Text
Keywords: Tiger; conservation standards; protected area management; management effectiveness; accreditation; conservation assured Tiger; conservation standards; protected area management; management effectiveness; accreditation; conservation assured
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Pasha, M.K.S.; Dudley, N.; Stolton, S.; Baltzer, M.; Long, B.; Roy, S.; Belecky, M.; Gopal, R.; Yadav, S.P. Setting and Implementing Standards for Management of Wild Tigers. Land 2018, 7, 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7030093

AMA Style

Pasha MKS, Dudley N, Stolton S, Baltzer M, Long B, Roy S, Belecky M, Gopal R, Yadav SP. Setting and Implementing Standards for Management of Wild Tigers. Land. 2018; 7(3):93. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7030093

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pasha, M. K. S., Nigel Dudley, Sue Stolton, Michael Baltzer, Barney Long, Sugoto Roy, Michael Belecky, Rajesh Gopal, and S. P. Yadav. 2018. "Setting and Implementing Standards for Management of Wild Tigers" Land 7, no. 3: 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7030093

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop