Next Article in Journal
The Positive Feedback Loop between the Impacts of Climate Change and Agricultural Expansion and Relocation
Next Article in Special Issue
Adaptation to New Climate by an Old Strategy? Modeling Sedentary and Mobile Pastoralism in Semi-Arid Morocco
Previous Article in Journal
Comparing Path Dependence and Spatial Targeting of Land Use in Implementing Climate Change Responses
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatially-Explicit Simulation of Urban Growth through Self-Adaptive Genetic Algorithm and Cellular Automata Modelling
Open AccessArticle

Integrating Land Cover Modeling and Adaptive Management to Conserve Endangered Species and Reduce Catastrophic Fire Risk

1
NASA Ecological Programs, InoMedic Health Applications, IHA-300, Kennedy Space Center, Merritt Island, FL 32899, USA
2
Southeast Climate Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 127H David Clark Labs, North Carolina State University, Box 7617, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
3
Southeast Ecological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 7920 NW 71 Street, Gainesville, FL 32653, USA
4
Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 12100 Beech Forest Road, Laurel, MD 20708, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2014, 3(3), 874-897; https://doi.org/10.3390/land3030874
Received: 2 May 2014 / Revised: 3 July 2014 / Accepted: 10 July 2014 / Published: 24 July 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Land Change Modeling: Connecting to the Bigger Picture)
Land cover modeling is used to inform land management, but most often via a two-step process, where science informs how management alternatives can influence resources, and then, decision makers can use this information to make decisions. A more efficient process is to directly integrate science and decision-making, where science allows us to learn in order to better accomplish management objectives and is developed to address specific decisions. Co-development of management and science is especially productive when decisions are complicated by multiple objectives and impeded by uncertainty. Multiple objectives can be met by the specification of tradeoffs, and relevant uncertainty can be addressed through targeted science (i.e., models and monitoring). We describe how to integrate habitat and fuel monitoring with decision-making focused on the dual objectives of managing for endangered species and minimizing catastrophic fire risk. Under certain conditions, both objectives might be achieved by a similar management policy; other conditions require tradeoffs between objectives. Knowledge about system responses to actions can be informed by developing hypotheses based on ideas about fire behavior and then applying competing management actions to different land units in the same system state. Monitoring and management integration is important to optimize state-specific management decisions and to increase knowledge about system responses. We believe this approach has broad utility and identifies a clear role for land cover modeling programs intended to inform decision-making. View Full-Text
Keywords: adaptive management; fire management; Florida scrub-jays; structured decision-making; state transitions; land cover modeling adaptive management; fire management; Florida scrub-jays; structured decision-making; state transitions; land cover modeling
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Breininger, D.; Duncan, B.; Eaton, M.; Johnson, F.; Nichols, J. Integrating Land Cover Modeling and Adaptive Management to Conserve Endangered Species and Reduce Catastrophic Fire Risk. Land 2014, 3, 874-897.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop