Next Article in Journal
Inventory, Susceptibility Assessment, and Morphometric Characteristics of Landslides in Lanping County, Yunnan, China
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Policy-Based Rice Insurance on Cultivated Land Quality Protection Behavior Among Large-Scale Farmers: Evidence from Pesticide Use Reduction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Assessing Landscape Ecological Sensitivity and Simulating Land Use Patterns with a DPSI-PLUS Framework

1
Langfang Integrated Natural Resources Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Tianjin 300304, China
2
Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Command Center, China Geological Survey, Beijing 100055, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2026, 15(9), 1569; https://doi.org/10.3390/land15091569
Submission received: 29 July 2026 / Revised: 19 August 2026 / Accepted: 25 August 2026 / Published: 26 August 2026
(This article belongs to the Topic Land Cover and Ecological Change)

Abstract

Rapid urbanization has significantly altered land use patterns in Deqing County, placing increasing pressure on its ecosystem. This study establishes a Driving Force–Pressure–State–Impact (DPSI) framework and selects ten indicators to evaluate ecological sensitivity for 2014, 2019, and 2024. It then couples this framework with the PLUS model to simulate land use and ecological sensitivity changes under the following three 2034 scenarios: natural development (ND), ecological protection (EP), and urban development (UD). Results show that ecological sensitivity exhibits a “high west, low east” spatial pattern and it fluctuated with an initial decline followed by a rise from 2014 to 2024, though the overall trend was a slow decrease. Land use type (weight 0.342), distance to rivers (weight 0.191), and distance to roads (weight 0.146) were the dominant influencing factors, together depicting Deqing’s ecological landscape of “western forests, eastern farmlands, and dense water networks”. The PLUS model demonstrated good validation accuracy (Kappa = 0.81), and the contributions of driving factors shifted over time. Multi-scenario simulation indicates that the ecological protection (EP) scenario is more suitable for sustainable urban development. We recommend implementing differentiated ecological control zones, integrating sensitivity evaluation into planning decisions, and improving the differentiated ecological compensation mechanism.
Keywords: ecological sensitivity; DPSI framework; PLUS model; land use change; multi-scenario simulation ecological sensitivity; DPSI framework; PLUS model; land use change; multi-scenario simulation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, E.; Liu, X.; Bai, J.; Shi, J.; Li, M.; Yuan, S. Assessing Landscape Ecological Sensitivity and Simulating Land Use Patterns with a DPSI-PLUS Framework. Land 2026, 15, 1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15091569

AMA Style

Zhao E, Liu X, Bai J, Shi J, Li M, Yuan S. Assessing Landscape Ecological Sensitivity and Simulating Land Use Patterns with a DPSI-PLUS Framework. Land. 2026; 15(9):1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15091569

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Enquan, Xiaodong Liu, Jie Bai, Jingtao Shi, Ming Li, and Shisong Yuan. 2026. "Assessing Landscape Ecological Sensitivity and Simulating Land Use Patterns with a DPSI-PLUS Framework" Land 15, no. 9: 1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15091569

APA Style

Zhao, E., Liu, X., Bai, J., Shi, J., Li, M., & Yuan, S. (2026). Assessing Landscape Ecological Sensitivity and Simulating Land Use Patterns with a DPSI-PLUS Framework. Land, 15(9), 1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15091569

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop