Next Article in Journal
Composite Ecological Spaces as Governance Units for Comprehensive Land Consolidation: Identification and Evaluation in a Water-Town Region of China
Previous Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal Evolution and Component Contributions to Urban Heat–Humidity Risk Changes in Sichuan Province, China, from 2000 to 2024
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

From Mismatch to Smart Match: Artificial Intelligence and Land Resource Misallocation

1
School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
2
Xinjiang Innovation Management Research Center, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
3
School of Tourism, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2026, 15(8), 1415; https://doi.org/10.3390/land15081415
Submission received: 8 February 2026 / Revised: 25 July 2026 / Accepted: 1 August 2026 / Published: 6 August 2026

Abstract

Optimizing the allocation of national land resources is a crucial measure for safeguarding food security and ecological security, as well as a key pathway for achieving urbanrural integration and coordinated regional development. Against the backdrop of the global digital transformation, artificial intelligence offers new opportunities for intelligent and refined land resource management. However, existing research has not sufficiently explored the impact of AI on land resource allocation. Using panel data of 265 Chinese cities from 2010 to 2023, this study investigates the effect of artificial intelligence level (AIL) on land resource misallocation (LRM) and its underlying mechanisms. The findings demonstrate the key conclusions: (1) AIL significantly reduces urban LRM. This result remains robust after adjusting the sample, accounting for province–time interactions, controlling for other policy effects, excluding outliers, and addressing endogeneity concerns. (2) Mechanism analysis indicates that AIL reduces urban LRM by enhancing government environmental concerns, promoting land transfer marketization and industrial structure upgrading. (3) Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the inhibitory effect of AIL on LRM is more pronounced in non-old industrial base cities, low-population-density cities and strong government intervention cities. These findings suggest that local governments should tailor AI research, development, and application strategies according to their cities’ resource endowments and developmental foundations. This study not only enriches empirical evidence on AI’s role in reducing LRM but also offers practical pathways and decision-making references for other countries to optimize territorial governance and achieve sustainable land resource utilization through digital and intelligent technologies.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; land resource misallocation; government environmental concern; land transfer marketization; industrial structure upgrading artificial intelligence; land resource misallocation; government environmental concern; land transfer marketization; industrial structure upgrading

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xin, L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C. From Mismatch to Smart Match: Artificial Intelligence and Land Resource Misallocation. Land 2026, 15, 1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15081415

AMA Style

Xin L, Liu Y, Wang Y, Liu C. From Mismatch to Smart Match: Artificial Intelligence and Land Resource Misallocation. Land. 2026; 15(8):1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15081415

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xin, Long, Yidan Liu, Yuyao Wang, and Chanyuan Liu. 2026. "From Mismatch to Smart Match: Artificial Intelligence and Land Resource Misallocation" Land 15, no. 8: 1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15081415

APA Style

Xin, L., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., & Liu, C. (2026). From Mismatch to Smart Match: Artificial Intelligence and Land Resource Misallocation. Land, 15(8), 1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15081415

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop