Next Article in Journal
Coordinated Development of Ecological Resilience and the Tourism Economy in Forest Parks of the Yellow River Basin
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial Planning and Land-Use Management—2nd Edition: Expanding the Agenda of Integrated and Multiscalar Spatial Governance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quantitative Morphological Resolution of Preservation–Renewal Conflicts for “Shanghai-Style Jiangnan” Villages, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Public Space Utilization in a Multi-Ethnic Co-Residential Village: An Empirical Study of Cizhong Village, China

Faculty of Architecture and City Planning, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650032, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2026, 15(5), 878; https://doi.org/10.3390/land15050878 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 3 April 2026 / Revised: 14 May 2026 / Accepted: 15 May 2026 / Published: 19 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rural Space: Between Renewal Processes and Preservation)

Abstract

In multi-ethnic villages, public space serves as more than just a venue for social interaction; it is the vital ground where cultural integration and community identity take root. This study examines Cizhong Village in the Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Yunnan, employing a mixed-methods approach that combines questionnaire surveys (N = 120), semi-structured interviews (N = 32), and Social Network Analysis (SNA) to compare the village’s planned spatial network with residents’ actual movement patterns. Findings reveal a significant structural mismatch: while the planned network exhibits higher density (0.32) and clustering (0.70), the behavioral network demonstrates a stronger small-world index (2.14 vs. 1.94), indicating that villagers organically form compact activity clusters around key social hubs such as the church and supermarket. QAP correlation analysis further shows that Tibetan and Naxi behavioral networks are highly similar (r = 0.833, p < 0.001), whereas Han networks exhibit weaker correlations (r = 0.527–0.607, p < 0.05), revealing a spatial pattern of “broad integration with localized ethnic preferences”. Grounded theory coding of interview data (55 initial concepts, 14 categories, 4 core categories) validates these structural findings and identifies the core theme of “superposed space of multi-ethnic dynamic sharing”. Based on these results, three optimization strategies are proposed: improving connectivity between public spaces, revitalizing key social hubs, and respecting established ethnic spatial traditions. These insights provide an evidence-based framework for managing public spaces in multi-ethnic rural communities.
Keywords: multi-ethnic co-residential village; public spaces; spatial usage characteristics; social network analysis; cultural adaptation; layout optimization multi-ethnic co-residential village; public spaces; spatial usage characteristics; social network analysis; cultural adaptation; layout optimization

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Sun, Z.; Wang, H. Public Space Utilization in a Multi-Ethnic Co-Residential Village: An Empirical Study of Cizhong Village, China. Land 2026, 15, 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15050878

AMA Style

Wang Y, Yuan Z, Sun Z, Wang H. Public Space Utilization in a Multi-Ethnic Co-Residential Village: An Empirical Study of Cizhong Village, China. Land. 2026; 15(5):878. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15050878

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Ying, Zhuojuan Yuan, Zongyao Sun, and Hao Wang. 2026. "Public Space Utilization in a Multi-Ethnic Co-Residential Village: An Empirical Study of Cizhong Village, China" Land 15, no. 5: 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15050878

APA Style

Wang, Y., Yuan, Z., Sun, Z., & Wang, H. (2026). Public Space Utilization in a Multi-Ethnic Co-Residential Village: An Empirical Study of Cizhong Village, China. Land, 15(5), 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15050878

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop