Next Article in Journal
Fiber Hemp Biomass Yield and Quality on Shallow Stony Soil in Southwest Germany
Next Article in Special Issue
Associations Between Physical Features and Behavioral Patterns in Macau Outdoor Community Public Spaces and Older Adults’ Performance of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Non-Landslide Sample Selection Methods on Landslide Susceptibility Prediction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Towards Equitable Representations of Ageing: Evaluation of Gender, Territories, Aids and Artificial Intelligence
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

GIS-Based Analysis of Elderly Care Facility Distribution and Supply–Demand Coordination in the Yangtze River Delta

1
School of Geomatics Science and Technology, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
2
Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment (Ministry of Education of PRC), Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
3
Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 211212, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2025, 14(4), 723; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14040723
Submission received: 24 January 2025 / Revised: 22 March 2025 / Accepted: 26 March 2025 / Published: 27 March 2025

Abstract

:
This study addresses the challenges related to the distribution of elderly care facilities in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region, which is experiencing a rapidly aging population. With over 176 million people aged 65 and above in China as of 2019 and the elderly population in the YRD continuing to grow, the study analyzes the spatial distribution, evolution, and supply–demand balance of elderly care facilities. Using GIS technologies, multi-source data analysis, and spatial autocorrelation techniques, the research identifies key regional patterns. Shanghai exhibits a clear hierarchical distribution of facilities, Jiangsu shows a “south strong, north weak” trend, while Zhejiang and Anhui demonstrate the opposite. The study also highlights a shift towards smaller, community-based care facilities, reflecting the growing demand for more localized services. It uncovers significant spatial mismatches and low coordination between supply and demand, particularly in rural and urban fringe areas, indicating the need for better regional coordination and more balanced resource distribution. To address these challenges, the study recommends (a) establishing cross-regional elderly care resource-sharing mechanisms; (b) promoting the development of small, community-based facilities; (c) integrating urban and rural services; and (d) leveraging technology for smart elderly care, including the use of big data and AI to optimize service delivery. These strategies aim to improve the equity and accessibility of elderly care services, ensuring that underserved areas receive better support. The findings provide a comprehensive framework for elderly care policies, offering valuable insights for other rapidly urbanizing regions and countries facing similar demographic challenges.

1. Introduction

Population aging is one of the major challenges facing modern societies and represents an inevitable trend accompanying social development [1]. This demographic shift is a global phenomenon affecting both developed and developing countries. According to the United Nations, the global population aged 60 and above has more than doubled over the past 30 years, and it is projected to nearly triple by 2050, reaching 2.1 billion people [2]. The rapid aging of the population places immense pressure on healthcare systems, pension schemes, and social services while also influencing economic productivity and intergenerational relationships [3,4,5]. Addressing the challenges posed by aging societies requires comprehensive strategies to ensure that elderly individuals receive adequate medical care, social welfare, and support systems, enabling them to live independently and with dignity [6,7].
As the world’s most populous developing country, China faces significant challenges related to population aging. According to the 2020 National Population Census released by the National Bureau of Statistics of China, the old people (aged 60 and above) had reached 264 million, accounting for 18.7% of the total population—an increase of 5.5 percentage points compared to 2010. At this rate of growth, China is expected to enter a “super-aged society” by 2035, with individuals aged 65 and above exceeding 20% of the total population [8]. In response to these demographic changes, the Chinese government has actively aligned with the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, incorporating “ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all at all ages” (Goal 3) [9] and “building sustainable cities and communities” (Goal 11) [10] into its national strategic priorities. In recent years, policy frameworks such as the Medium- and Long-Term Plan for Actively Responding to Population Aging (2019) [11] and the report from the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China [12] have been issued, outlining key policy pathways for strengthening elderly care services, promoting the development of the aging industry, optimizing resource allocation, and enhancing the quality of care services.
At the regional level, aging-related challenges are particularly pronounced. The Yangtze River Delta (YRD), one of the first regions in China to enter an aging society, has experienced one of the most rapid demographic shifts, placing significant pressure on elderly care services [13]. The YRD region, covering Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Anhui provinces, spans approximately 350,000 square kilometers and is home to over 200 million people [14]. As a region characterized by high population density and advanced economic development, the continuous improvement of economic conditions and healthcare services has led to an increase in life expectancy and a significant rise in the number of old people. Recent statistical data indicate that the proportion of the population aged 65 and above in Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Anhui has reached 16.28%, 16.20%, 13.27%, and 15.01%, respectively [15]. With the exception of Zhejiang, the other provinces have already entered a moderately aged society. However, significant disparities exist in aging patterns between urban and rural areas and among cities within the YRD region [16,17]. Furthermore, the escalating demand for elderly care services is exerting tremendous pressure on the regional public service system. Particularly in terms of elderly care facilities, the YRD faces structural issues such as unbalanced facility distribution, resource misallocation, and mismatches between urban and rural service demands [18,19]. These challenges necessitate a spatially oriented, data-driven research approach to identify the distribution patterns and dynamic evolution of elderly care facilities across different geographical areas, thereby supporting evidence-based policymaking and targeted interventions.
This study focuses on the spatial distribution and supply–demand imbalance of elderly care facilities in the Yangtze River Delta. By integrating information geography, web scraping techniques, geographic information systems (GISs), and statistical modeling, this research constructs a comprehensive dataset of elderly care facilities in the YRD region. It analyzes spatial distribution patterns, temporal trends, and the alignment of facility supply with population needs. The findings of this study not only contribute to enhancing the scientific precision of local government decision-making in elderly care service provision but also provide an analytical framework applicable to the global discourse on aging. This research offers insights into promoting equity in elderly care services and advancing sustainable urban development in the context of global population aging.

2. Literature Review

With the growing severity of population aging, elderly care facilities have become crucial components in ensuring the quality of life and well-being of old people [20,21]. These facilities play a key role in urban sustainable development strategies, serving not only as places for caregiving [22], rehabilitation [23,24], and psychological support [25,26] but also directly influencing the convenience of daily life and the social participation of elderly populations [27]. Therefore, the spatial configuration and service equity of elderly care facilities have become critical topics in the field of aging studies. Many countries are now focusing on integrating elderly care facilities into broader territorial planning strategies. Urban and regional policies are increasingly addressing the need for equitable access to care services by ensuring that facilities are strategically located to serve both urban and rural populations. The overlap between territorial planning and elderly care facility policies is particularly evident in efforts to improve accessibility, integrate services across regions, and create environments that support aging in place, all while balancing the distribution of resources to meet the growing demands of an aging population.
Existing research primarily focuses on identifying the spatial distribution characteristics of elderly care service facilities. Descriptive statistical and visualization techniques are commonly used to reveal the density, spatial clustering, and dispersion patterns of various types of facilities. Frochen et al. [28] applied the Getis-Ord Gi* index to conduct spatial clustering and hotspot analysis, revealing significant spatial aggregation of elderly care facilities in the Los Angeles area. Huang [29] utilized kernel density estimation (KDE) to systematically explore the spatial distribution and clustering characteristics of eight types of elderly care facilities, highlighting notable spatial imbalances in facility layouts. Tan et al. [20] analyzed the spatial pattern of elderly care facilities in Tianjin using Moran’s I, identifying significant spatial clustering in central urban areas. Most studies widely apply Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques for spatial visualization, employing methods such as standard deviational ellipse (SDE) [30,31,32], kernel density estimation (KDE) [33,34,35], and Moran’s I [20,36,37] to examine the spatial aggregation and evolutionary trends of elderly care facilities, providing essential technical support for optimizing facility layouts.
As research progresses, scholars have shifted from focusing solely on “spatial visualization of facility distribution” to analyzing “service accessibility,” emphasizing the spatial interactions between elderly care facilities and aging populations. Accessibility analysis has become a core research focus, with commonly used methods including Euclidean distance, network distance, and population demand-weighted models [38,39,40]. Among these, the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method has been widely adopted for assessing the accessibility of elderly care facilities. Cheng et al. [41] utilized the 2SFCA method to analyze the geographic accessibility of multi-tiered healthcare services for the old people, emphasizing the importance of improving elderly healthcare accessibility in optimizing public health resource allocation. Guida and Carpentieri [42] further refined the 2SFCA model by incorporating a distance decay function and multimodal transportation network modeling. By integrating pedestrian pathways, bus routes, and urban rail transit, they developed a more realistic accessibility evaluation system.
In recent years, with the advancement of the “aging-in-place” concept and age-friendly city initiatives, research has expanded to regional-scale analyses of service supply–demand equity. Scholars have begun examining the spatial disparities in elderly care resources across different administrative units, such as streets, communities, and districts. For example, Ellen et al. [43] conducted a systematic evaluation of 86 types of elderly care services in Australia, assessing their effectiveness in meeting the needs of aging populations. Higgs [44] analyzed the spatial disparities in social care service provision using the Welsh national database of residential and care home beds, focusing on localized resource allocation challenges. Sagara [45] investigated the employment mechanisms and structural challenges faced by elderly care assistants in nursing institutions through fax surveys and questionnaires. The study found that large institutions generally provide more comprehensive training and support systems, whereas small- and medium-sized institutions suffer from workforce shortages, exacerbating structural imbalances within the elderly care service system.
Despite the theoretical foundations and methodological advancements provided by existing studies, several key gaps remain in the spatial analysis of elderly care facilities. First, most current research relies on static cross-sectional data, lacking systematic tracking and quantitative analysis of the dynamic evolution of elderly care facility distribution over time. This limitation hinders the accurate depiction of spatial changes in facility layouts in the context of urban development and demographic aging. Second, while accessibility and equity have become central research themes, the coordinated mechanisms underlying supply–demand matching remain underexplored. Additionally, in terms of data acquisition, traditional government statistical data often suffer from delayed updates and insufficient spatial resolution, limiting the real-time applicability and granularity of research findings.

3. Methodology

Given the existing research gaps in the dynamic evolution of elderly care facilities and the coordination mechanisms of supply and demand, this study focuses on the YRD region and constructs a comprehensive analytical framework integrating “spatial distribution–evolutionary characteristics–supply–demand coupling.” By leveraging web scraping and geocoding techniques, a spatial database of elderly care facilities is established. The study employs Moran’s I, nearest neighbor index, kernel density analysis, and standard deviational ellipse to analyze the spatial evolution of these facilities. Additionally, a coupling coordination model and the entropy weight method are utilized to assess the spatial matching between facilities and elderly people. The objective is to comprehensively depict the spatiotemporal evolution patterns and supply–demand equilibrium of elderly care facilities in the YRD region, thereby providing theoretical support and empirical insights for optimizing regional elderly care service systems. The research methodology consists of three main aspects.

3.1. Development of a Regional Elderly Care Facility Dataset Based on Web Scraping and GIS Technology

This study selected elderly care facility data published by the Integrated Civil Affairs Service Platform as the baseline dataset. Based on this, web scraping and relevant GIS analysis methods were utilized to spatially locate and enrich the attributes of the elderly care facilities, ultimately constructing a spatial distribution dataset. The dataset fields include information such as institution name, credit code, number of beds, and address. The data processing workflow is as follows (Figure 1):
(1) Based on the elderly care facility data provided by the Integrated Civil Affairs Service Platform, the facility directory was cleaned and verified. Given the limitations in attribute information, such as the lack of time-based data, additional information was gathered from civil affairs bureaus (departments) of the three provinces and one municipality, as well as from corporate data sources like Qichacha, Tianyancha, and various elderly care websites to enrich the dataset.
(2) The enhanced elderly care facility data were then geocoded to convert the addresses into geographic coordinates, which were imported into the GIS for spatial visualization.
(3) For quality control, regional Points of Interest (POI) data products, maps, and remote sensing imagery were used, along with official data on elderly care facilities and statistical yearbooks published by provincial (municipal) civil affairs bureaus (departments), to verify the spatial locations and attribute information.
Figure 1. Data development process.
Figure 1. Data development process.
Land 14 00723 g001
This study focuses on elderly care service facilities, encompassing both public and private institutional care facilities as well as community-based elderly care facilities. These facilities provide comprehensive services for people aged 60 and above, including daily living support, health care, recreational activities, and more. The types of facilities include nursing homes, elderly care homes, senior apartments/elderly apartments, care homes, dementia care institutions, small-scale community institutions, and retirement communities [46]. Moreover, the study uses Python’s Requests and Beautiful Soup libraries for web scraping, adheres to legal and ethical standards, and complies with the requirements of the website’s robots.txt file.
The other data sources are as follows. The transportation network data were derived from the National 1:1,000,000 Basic Geographic Information Data (2021) from the National Geomatics Center of China (https://www.ngcc.cn/, accessed on 12 July 2024). Information on elderly care facilities, related attributes, and Points of Interest (POI) data were sourced from the Yangtze River Delta Data Center (http://nnu.geodata.cn/, accessed on 18 July 2024).

3.2. Spatiotemporal Pattern Evolution Analysis

To better analyze the distribution and evolution trends of regional elderly care facilities, this study analyzes by calculating the global Moran’s index and nearest neighbor index, detecting whether the current layout of elderly care facilities exhibits spatial clustering or dispersion within the study area and examining the evolution of distribution characteristics. Additionally, kernel density estimation is employed to analyze the development trends and characteristics of elderly care facilities at different stages, while the standard deviation ellipse (SDE) is used to observe their expansion direction and range trends (Figure 2).
Global Moran’s Index
Global Moran’s I is used to analyze the overall spatial distribution trends of a given attribute within a specific region. It plays an important role in understanding the spatial distribution patterns and spatial interactions of geographic phenomena [47]. This index reflects whether spatial data exhibit clustering or dispersion trends, as well as the strength and significance of these trends. Based on previous research [48], this study uses the Global Moran’s I to analyze the spatial clustering of elderly care facilities and determine whether these facilities are clustered or dispersed in geographic space. Moran’s I value ranges between [−1, 1], where positive values indicate clustering, negative values indicate dispersion, and zero represents no spatial autocorrelation. The calculation formula is presented in Equation (1).
I = n S 0 i = 1 n j = 1 n w i j x i x x j x i = 1 n x i x 2
where n is the total number of observations, x i and x j are the attribute values of regions i and j , x is the mean of observed values, w i j represents the spatial weight between i and j , S 0 is the sum of all spatial weights.
Nearest Neighbor Index
The nearest neighbor index (NNI) [49] is a spatial statistical method commonly used to analyze the spatial distribution characteristics of point patterns (such as the distribution of buildings or facilities in a city or the distribution of plants and animals in nature). It is widely used in fields like geography, ecology, and urban planning. The NNI analyzes the distance between a specific point and its nearest neighboring point to determine whether the distribution tends toward randomness, clustering, or uniformity.
N N I = r o b s r e x p
where r o b s is the observed average distance between each point and its nearest neighbor, and r e x p is the expected nearest neighbor distance for a randomly distributed set of points, calculated as:
r e x p = 1 2 n A
where n is the number of points (sample size) in the study area, A is the area of the study region.
Kernel Density Estimation
Kernel density estimation (KDE) is a non-parametric spatial analysis method often used to analyze areas of spatial concentration [50]. The kernel function can take various forms, such as triangular, quadrilateral, Gaussian, and Epanechnikov kernel [51]. Referring to previous studies [52], this paper uses the Gaussian kernel function to study the dynamic evolution trend of elderly care facility distribution. The formula is:
f x = 1 n h i = 1 n K x x i h
where n is the number of observations, h is the bandwidth, K is the kernel function, x x i is the distance from the estimation point to the observation point.
Standard Deviation Ellipse
The SDE [53] is mainly used to quantify and visualize the spatial distribution patterns of geographic data. By calculating the center of geographic point data, distribution directionality, and dispersion (standard deviation), the spatial distribution is represented as an elliptical shape. This ellipse intuitively reflects the spatial range, trends, and directionality of data distribution. Referring to previous studies [54], this method is applied to observe the spatial range and directional trends in the distribution of elderly care facilities. Assume there are n elderly care facilities with coordinates ( x i , y i ). The main calculation formulas are as follows:
Center point:
x = 1 n i = 1 n x i , y = 1 n i = 1 n y i
Axis lengths:
σ x = 1 n i = 1 n x i x 2 , σ y = 1 n i = 1 n y i y 2
Ellipse rotation angle:
θ = 1 2 a r c t a n 2 i = 1 n x i x y i y i = 1 n x i x 2 i = 1 n y i y 2

3.3. Supply–Demand Equilibrium Analysis

Coupling Coordination Degree Model
The coupling coordination model [55] is specifically designed to analyze the relationship between supply and demand systems, assessing the degree of matching and coordination between them. This model is widely used in fields such as ecological environment coordination [56], tourism resource management [57], and the layout of public service facilities [58], making it an effective tool for evaluating balanced regional development. Drawing on previous research [57,59], this study uses the coupling coordination model to calculate the coupling coordination degree between the supply and demand of elderly care facilities across counties and districts. The specific formulas are as follows:
1. Calculation of the Comprehensive Evaluation Index for Supply and Demand:
u X i = j = 1 m W j × X i j
where W j represents the weight of each indicator (calculated using the entropy weight method), X i j is the j-th indicator of the i-th sample, m is the total number of indicators.
2. Calculation of development level, reflecting the overall situation of supply and demand:
T = α u 1 X i + β u 2 X i
where α and β represent the weights of supply and demand, generally taken as equal.
3. Calculation of the coupling degree, which measures the strength of the interaction between the supply and demand systems. A higher coupling degree indicates a more significant supply–demand relationship:
C = 2 × u 1 × u 2 u 1 + u 2 2
where u 1 and u 2 are the comprehensive evaluation functions of the supply and demand systems, respectively.
4. Calculation of the coupling coordination degree:
D = C × T

4. Study Area

The study area for this paper is located in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) of China (Figure 3). According to the Development Plan Outline for the Integrated Development of the YRD, approved by China’s State Council in 2019, the YRD includes Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Anhui, and Shanghai [60]. This region consists of 41 cities, spans an area of 358,000 square kilometers, and is home to more than 200 million people. The YRD is distinguished by its advanced economy, geographical proximity, close social connections, and shared cultural heritage. As one of the most densely populated regions in China, the YRD has a significant aging population, with challenges associated with aging becoming increasingly prominent. The growing trend of population aging in recent years has resulted in a continuous rise in the demand for elderly care services, making elderly care facilities a focal point of social attention. According to the Overview of the Elderly Care Industry Development in the Yangtze River Delta Region (2021), the national strategy of YRD regional integration has encouraged the three provinces and one municipality to actively establish institutional environments conducive to the development of the elderly care industry. This strategy has fostered innovation in the sector, positioning the YRD as a leading region for elderly care industry development in China. In China’s administrative hierarchy, the highest level includes provinces and municipalities. Below this are prefecture-level cities. These cities are further divided into counties and districts. Counties are generally rural administrative units, while districts are urban subdivisions within prefecture-level cities or municipalities.
China’s population census data are systematically collected by the National Bureau of Statistics to provide comprehensive insights into the country’s demographic characteristics, structure, distribution, and socio-economic features [61]. Since the first national census in 1953, China has conducted seven censuses, typically every ten years, with the 2000, 2010, and 2020 censuses being particularly notable. Population censuses are essential for accurately understanding the demographic status of China and addressing population-related and socio-economic challenges. They also serve as a critical data source for addressing population aging and supporting the country’s high-quality development strategy. According to the latest data from the seventh national census, the proportion of people aged 65 and older in Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Anhui provinces are 16.28%, 16.20%, 13.27%, and 15.01%, respectively. Compared to the 2010 census, the proportion of people aged 65 and older increased by 6.20%, 5.32%, 3.93%, and 4.78%, respectively. Figure 4 illustrates the aging trends in each district and county within the YRD region, categorized into five stages (Table 1) based on the proportion of individuals aged 65 and above.

5. Analysis and Results

5.1. Analysis of the Spatial Distribution of Elderly Care Facilities in the Yangtze River Delta

This study employs ArcGIS to conduct a comprehensive spatial visualization analysis of elderly care facilities and their bed capacities across counties in the YRD region. Utilizing the Natural Breaks (Jenks) classification method, we stratify these indicators into five distinct levels, providing a nuanced cartographic representation that reveals subtle spatial variations in elderly care infrastructure (Figure 5). The results reveal significant inter-provincial and regional disparities in the allocation of elderly care resources. Shanghai, as the core city of the region, exhibits a marked advantage in this regard, with the highest number of facilities and bed capacities, characterized by a concentric spatial distribution where resources are more concentrated in the central urban areas, gradually decreasing toward the outer suburbs. Jiangsu Province shows a “South Strong, North Weak” pattern, with the southern cities like Suzhou, Wuxi, and Nantong having a high density of elderly care facilities and beds, while the northern cities such as Xuzhou, Suqian, and Lianyungang have fewer facilities and beds, reflecting regional developmental imbalances. This highlights the dominance of southern Jiangsu in elderly care resource allocation while also underscoring the internal disparities within the province. In Zhejiang and Anhui, elderly care resources follow a “North Strong, South Weak” distribution. In Zhejiang, northern cities such as Hangzhou and Ningbo have a high concentration of facilities and beds, while regions like Lishui and Quzhou in the west are comparatively underdeveloped, aligning with the province’s regional economic disparities. Similarly, in Anhui, the northern cities such as Suzhou, Fuyang, and Bozhou have relatively dense elderly care resources, while the southern cities like Huangshan, Chizhou, and Anqing face a scarcity of such resources.
Further analysis of the spatial distribution of elderly care resources across 41 cities in the region (Figure 6 and Figure 7) reveals marked urban–rural disparities. In Shanghai, elderly care resources are predominantly urban-oriented, with a concentration of facilities in central and suburban urban areas where individual facility sizes are larger, while rural areas in the outer suburbs have fewer and smaller facilities. In Jiangsu, the southern region is dominated by urban facilities, while the northern region exhibits a more balanced urban–rural distribution, with smaller facilities overall. Zhejiang displays a regional gradient in resource allocation, with developed cities like Hangzhou and Ningbo leading in the number and size of elderly care facilities, while less developed areas like Lishui and Quzhou have more rural facilities, though their scale is smaller. Anhui’s distribution is notably rural-centric, with rural elderly care facilities predominating in cities such as Lu’an, Wuhu, Anqing, and Huangshan, and in some areas, rural bed numbers even exceed those in urban areas.
To further explore the spatial distribution and development characteristics of elderly care facilities in the YRD from a macro perspective, global spatial autocorrelation and nearest neighbor index analyses were conducted. As shown in Table 2, the global Moran’s I index is 0.51, statistically significant at the 99% confidence level, indicating a spatial clustering pattern of elderly care facilities. To examine changes in clustering or dispersion over different time periods, the spatial distribution data of elderly care facilities were extracted based on the timing of three population censuses, focusing on 2000, 2010, and 2020. Nearest neighbor index analysis was performed for each of these years (Table 3). From 2000 to 2010, the nearest neighbor index rose from 0.86 to 0.89, indicating a trend toward greater dispersion of elderly care facilities during this period. However, from 2010 to 2020, the nearest neighbor index decreased from 0.89 to 0.76, showing a shift toward greater clustering. By 2020, the nearest neighbor index further dropped to 0.76, suggesting that elderly care facilities began to concentrate significantly in certain areas.

5.2. Analysis of Spatiotemporal Evolution Trends of Elderly Care Facilities in the Yangtze River Delta

Employing a Gaussian kernel function for kernel density estimation, this study meticulously analyzes the spatiotemporal dynamics of elderly care facility development, revealing the evolution and migration of hotspots across different periods. The results of the kernel density analysis are shown in Figure 8. From 2000 to 2020, the spatial distribution of elderly care facilities experienced a significant evolution. In 2000, high-density areas for elderly care facilities were mainly concentrated in Shanghai and its surrounding areas. By 2010, elderly care facilities began to expand to other cities in the YRD, especially in cities such as Suzhou and Nanjing, where the density increased. By 2020, the spatial distribution of elderly care facilities had further expanded, with high-density areas no longer limited to Shanghai and its surrounding cities. More cities in the YRD, such as Hefei and Nanjing (provincial capitals), as well as the Su-Xi-Chang metropolitan area (the urban agglomeration centered around the cities of Suzhou, Wuxi, and Changzhou in Jiangsu Province, China, which are closely interconnected in terms of economic, transportation, and social activities), had developed high-density zones. The distribution in northern Anhui and coastal areas in eastern Zhejiang had also increased significantly. Although the distribution improved, imbalances remained, with some remote areas, such as Huangshan and Lishui in Zhejiang, still facing insufficient elderly care services.
To better understand the expansion range and evolutionary direction of elderly care facility distribution, this study uses the standard deviation ellipse method to analyze elderly care facilities between 2000 and 2020. As shown in Figure 9, the region has undergone a significant spatial restructuring. In terms of the evolution of the spatial center of gravity, the center point of facilities shows a clear trend of southeastward migration. From 2000, when the facility center was around the Nanjing area, it gradually moved southeastward, and by 2020, it had shifted to the Zhenjiang–Changzhou urban belt. This migration reflects the development trend of the core region of the YRD and also demonstrates how the spatial layout of elderly care facilities responds to regional socio-economic development levels. From the shape changes of the standard deviation ellipse, the range of the ellipse shows a continuous contraction from 2000 to 2020, but it has always maintained a northwest–southeast-oriented axis. The distribution range was widest in 2000, with a high elongation ratio of the ellipse, indicating a more scattered spatial distribution of elderly care facilities in the early period. The ellipse area gradually shrank over time, and by 2020, a more concentrated spatial pattern had formed. This evolutionary feature reveals that the spatial organization of elderly care facilities is shifting from a dispersed model to a more concentrated one, gradually forming an intensive layout centered around regional core cities.
The study also provides a statistical analysis of elderly care facilities of different scales over time (Figure 10). The data show significant changes in the scale structure of elderly care facilities in the YRD between 2000 and 2020. The proportion of small-scale elderly care facilities (0–99 beds) increased from about 33% in 2000 to around 42% in 2020, a rise of 9 percentage points. The proportion of medium- and large-scale facilities (200 beds and above) remained relatively stable, maintaining around 25% over the 20-year period. Meanwhile, the proportion of medium- and small-scale facilities (100–199 beds) decreased from about 32% in 2000 to around 26% in 2020, a decline of 8 percentage points. This shift indicates a structural adjustment in the elderly care facilities in the YRD, transitioning from large institutions dominating the sector to a greater prevalence of smaller facilities.

5.3. Discussion-Coupling Coordination Degree of Supply and Demand for Elderly Care Services in the Yangtze River Delta

To investigate the balance between the supply and demand of elderly care facilities in the YRD, this study conducts a supply–demand matching analysis of these at the county level for the year 2020. The evaluation indicators were divided into two subsystems: supply and demand. Using the entropy method to determine the weight of each indicator and following principles of scientific validity, data availability, and systematization, a coupling evaluation index system for the supply and demand of elderly care services in the YRD was constructed, as shown in Table 4. The coupling coordination model was employed to calculate the comprehensive evaluation indices of elderly care service supply and demand levels, as well as the coupling coordination index for 306 counties and districts in the YRD. This model provides a quantitative measure of the degree of coordination between the supply and demand for elderly care facilities across the region.
The spatial distribution of the comprehensive supply and demand indices for elderly care facilities in the YRD reveals significant disparities in supply–demand matching across the region (Figure 11). Overall, the level of elderly care service supply is relatively low and unevenly distributed. High supply index areas are primarily concentrated in the northern Anhui region and a few economically developed cities and their surrounding areas along the southeastern coast, with scattered distribution in central areas. Most regions exhibit relatively low supply indices. In comparison, high-demand index areas are more concentrated, especially in the eastern coastal and certain inland regions, where the demand for elderly care services is higher and more concentrated.
From the perspective of supply–demand coupling coordination, the overall coordination degree of elderly care facilities in the YRD is relatively low, with significant spatial variation in the types of coupling coordination between elderly care demand and facility supply (Figure 12). Severely uncoordinated areas are concentrated in the southwestern part of the region, forming a band-like pattern, particularly in western Huangshan (Anhui) and western Lishui (Zhejiang), which are characterized by mountainous terrain and poor transportation. Moderately uncoordinated areas are more widespread, primarily located in central parts of the YRD. Marginally coordinated areas are mainly concentrated in the southeastern coastal region and the northwestern part of the YRD. The southeastern coastal areas include cities like Nantong and the Suzhou-Wuxi-ChangzhouSu-Xi-Chang metropolitan area, while the northwestern areas include southern Bozhou, southern Fuyang, and northern Lu’an. Moderately coordinated areas are relatively few and scattered, mainly found in urban districts such as Pudong, Baoshan, and Minhang in Shanghai; Gulou in Nanjing; Gusu in Suzhou; Liangxi in Wuxi; and Shangcheng and Xiacheng in Hangzhou. Highly coordinated areas are sparsely concentrated in the core region of Shanghai. Based on local autocorrelation analysis, it can be observed that both H-H and L-L clusters exhibit significant spatial agglomeration characteristics. H-H clusters are primarily concentrated in the entire Shanghai area and the core of Nanjing, forming contiguous clusters. These regions are economically developed, have convenient transportation, and exhibit a well-coordinated development of elderly care services and demand. In contrast, L-L clusters are relatively concentrated in peripheral areas with relatively underdeveloped economies, poor transportation, and a location far from the center of the YRD, such as Huangshan and Lishui. H-L (high-low) and L-H (low-high) clusters are relatively rare and do not form significant spatial clusters, mainly appearing near the H-H and L-L cluster areas.

6. Discussion

The spatial distribution of elderly care facilities in the YRD exhibits significant regional differentiation, reflecting disparities in regional economic development as well as inefficiencies in elderly care resource allocation. The metropolitan cluster centered around Shanghai demonstrates a notable concentration of elderly care resources, driven primarily by the city’s role as a national economic center, enhancing its capacity for population aggregation and service provision. However, such a concentrated distribution pattern also reveals a pronounced “Matthew Effect” [62] in resource allocation, whereby economically developed areas attract a disproportionately high share of high-quality elderly care resources, leaving less-developed regions unable to effectively meet the growing service demands. Addressing this imbalance necessitates systematic adjustments through regional coordination strategies aimed at optimizing elderly care service allocation on a broader spatial scale. From an urban–rural perspective, the elderly care facility distribution presents a clear dual structure, with distinct development pathways emerging across provinces and cities. Shanghai and southern Jiangsu primarily feature urban-oriented elderly care facilities, indicative of a highly urbanized area’s preference toward institution-based elderly care service systems. In contrast, Anhui Province exhibits a higher proportion of rural elderly care facilities, reflecting the continuation of traditional family-based and rural collective care models. These urban–rural differences illustrate not only varying stages of socio-economic development but also underscore the diversity in elderly care provision shaped by regional cultural traditions, lifestyles, and institutional practices. Therefore, future elderly care service planning should adhere to the principle of localized adaptation, balancing urban–rural developmental stages and integrating local cultural traditions to foster differentiated and specialized care models.
From a temporal perspective, the spatial evolution of elderly care facilities in the YRD demonstrates distinct developmental phases. Between 2000 and 2010, elderly care facilities exhibited a dispersed spatial pattern, reflecting widespread initial investment and broad infrastructure establishment in elderly care service development. Between 2010 and 2020, however, the distribution shifted toward increasing centralization within urban core areas, indicating an advanced stage characterized by resource integration and efficiency enhancement. This evolutionary trajectory aligns with general developmental logic observed in public service facilities and highlights an ongoing trend towards the professionalization and scaling-up of elderly care services. Nevertheless, excessive centralization may inadvertently exacerbate regional disparities in resource redistribution, underscoring the necessity for policies to enhance service protection mechanisms targeting peripheral areas and vulnerable populations, thus balancing efficiency-driven goals with equity-oriented objectives. Additionally, shifts in the scale and structure of elderly care facilities highlight transitions in service models. The rising prominence of small-scale and community-based elderly care facilities reflects the increasing popularity of the “aging-in-place” concept and growing demand for personalized, refined elderly services. While this trend enhances accessibility and convenience for elderly residents, it also poses new challenges, such as reduced operational efficiency and increased difficulties in standardizing service quality. Consequently, future optimization of elderly care systems must carefully balance intimacy and accessibility of community-based care with operational efficiency and service standardization through targeted policy guidance and technological support.
Examining supply–demand relationships, significant regional disparities characterize the spatial match between elderly care facility supply and elderly population demand in the YRD region. High-supply areas are concentrated in economically developed southeastern coastal regions and parts of northern Anhui; the former benefit from abundant financial and human resources, while the latter enjoy preferential policy support and local investments. In contrast, demand for elderly care services is primarily concentrated in eastern coastal regions and certain inland areas with high aging populations, closely linked to demographic characteristics and urbanization processes. This study identifies three distinct patterns of spatial coordination between elderly care facility supply and demand. Severely unbalanced areas mainly occur in remote mountainous or peripheral regions with poor transportation infrastructure, highlighting the constraint of infrastructure limitations on service accessibility. Moderately unbalanced areas are widespread across the region, indicating an ongoing developmental phase of the elderly care system, with significant potential for improvement in overall coordination efficiency. Highly coordinated areas, meanwhile, are primarily centered around major urban cores like Shanghai, reflecting the institutional and systemic advantages possessed by economically advanced regions in integrating and optimizing elderly care services.
Further analysis using local spatial autocorrelation reveals significant clustering in supply–demand coordination. High-High (H-H) clusters—areas characterized by both high supply and high demand—predominantly occur in economically developed, well-equipped regions, effectively meeting diverse elderly care needs. Conversely, Low-Low (L-L) clusters—areas with both low supply and low demand—are typically found in resource-deficient regions with lower rates of aging, facing dual pressures from insufficient resource investment and gaps in service coverage. The interwoven distribution of High-Low (H-L) and Low-High (L-H) clusters illustrates transitional spatial mismatches in supply–demand relationships. These “potential mismatch zones” suggest that targeted policy interventions are necessary to enhance service efficiency and spatial equity in elderly care provision precisely.

7. Conclusions

This study, based on the perspective of information geography, takes the YRD region as the research subject. Using methods such as information collection, GIS spatial analysis, and statistical modeling, the study systematically analyzes the spatial distribution characteristics, evolution path, and supply–demand matching pattern of elderly care facilities in the YRD. It constructs a comprehensive analysis framework integrating “spatial differentiation–evolution characteristics–supply–demand coupling.” The study finds that elderly care facilities in the YRD exhibit significant regional differences and stage-specific evolution characteristics. There is a spatial mismatch and uneven coordination between supply and demand, providing empirical evidence for regional elderly care policy formulation and optimization of elderly care resource allocation. Based on the findings and theoretical framework, we propose the following conclusions and policy recommendations:
1. Uneven spatial distribution of elderly care facilities and significant regional differences: Elderly care facilities in the YRD region exhibit a clear urban–rural dual distribution, with a high density in urban areas and a shortage in suburban and rural areas. This creates a “center-periphery” spatial structure, reflecting the imbalances in resource distribution observed globally and regional development theories on resource tilt and policy selectivity. To address this spatial imbalance, we recommend implementing targeted policy interventions including (a) establishing financial incentives and subsidies specifically for rural elderly care facility development; (b) creating cross-regional elderly care service networks that enable resource sharing between urban and rural areas; and (c) developing integrated transportation systems to improve accessibility to existing facilities for rural elderly populations. Additionally, the observed shift toward smaller, community-based facilities represents a positive development that can partially mitigate the center-periphery imbalance by bringing care services closer to where elderly people live.
2. Spatial mismatch and coordination imbalance between supply and demand of elderly care facilities in the YRD: There is a significant spatial misalignment between the high-demand elderly population areas and the supply of elderly care facilities, particularly in urban–rural fringe and rural areas with severe aging. This mismatch reduces service efficiency and exacerbates accessibility issues for elderly groups. To address this challenge, we recommend implementing a multi-scale precise allocation and supply–demand matching mechanism to optimize resource distribution. Specific measures include establishing a real-time monitoring system for elderly population density and care demand to dynamically guide facility layout optimization, formulating differentiated regional elderly care policies to prioritize resource allocation in severely aging areas, and introducing intelligent demand forecasting models to enable proactive allocation of elderly care resources, thereby enhancing service accessibility and equity.
From an international perspective, the findings of this study align with the welfare geography views proposed by Pinch [63] and Smith [64] and the spatial justice theories of Soja [65] and Harvey [66], which state that the distribution of public service facilities is often positively correlated with socio-economic status, resulting in unequal spatial distribution of resources. The observed phenomenon of elderly care facility agglomeration in urban core areas is consistent with these theories, and the uneven distribution of elderly care facilities reflects inequality in spatial resource allocation. This theoretical framework helps explain why elderly care services are more advanced in economically developed areas. By drawing on the path dependency theory of Martin and Sunley [67], we find that the spatial distribution pattern of elderly care facilities in the YRD is profoundly influenced by historical development trajectories and institutional inertia, explaining why the supply model is slow to adjust despite changes in demand.
Based on the research findings, the following recommendations are proposed to address the issues of large-scale aging and supply–demand imbalance in the Yangtze River Delta region. Firstly, it is crucial to strengthen regionally coordinated development by establishing a cross-regional elderly care resource-sharing mechanism, focusing on supporting the construction of elderly care facilities in underdeveloped areas to reduce provincial and urban–rural gaps. This could be achieved by learning from the EU’s regional balanced development policies [68] and Australia’s cross-regional resource-sharing models [69]. Secondly, the elderly care service system should be improved by promoting the professionalization and scaling-up of services while also actively supporting the development of small, community-based elderly care facilities and enhancing the integration of urban and rural services. This can be achieved by adopting the Nordic “continuum of care” [70] model and Japan’s “community-inclusive care system” [71] to build a multi-level elderly care network covering community, home, and institutional services. Finally, technology should be leveraged to enhance elderly care services by establishing a smart elderly care platform that integrates big data, the Internet of Things, and artificial intelligence. Drawing on Singapore’s “smart nation” [72] initiatives and South Korea’s remote care systems [73], information technology should be deeply integrated into elderly care to address spatial distribution gaps and improve both temporal and spatial accessibility of services.
As one of the six globally recognized world-class metropolitan areas, the elderly care service system and development model in the Yangtze River Delta region provide diverse solutions for global aging governance, especially suitable for densely populated and rapidly urbanizing Asian countries and developing countries undergoing economic transformation. In the future, its regional collaboration mechanism and smart elderly care model can be further promoted, offering a Chinese solution to the global challenge of aging.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.H. and Y.L.; methodology, H.H.; software, H.S.; validation, H.H., Y.L. and H.S.; formal analysis, Y.L.; resources, M.G. and J.T.; data curation, M.G. and J.T.; writing—original draft preparation, H.H.; writing—review and editing, Y.L. and H.S.; visualization, H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFF0711600).

Data Availability Statement

The elderly care facility dataset for the Yangtze River Delta constructed in this study has been publicly published in the National Earth System Science Data Sharing Infrastructure. The access URL is https://nnu.geodata.cn/data/datadetails.html?dataguid=259020829163433&docid=34, accessed on 1 January 2025.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgement for the data support from “Yangtze River Delta Science Data Center National Earth System Science Data Center, National Science & Technology Infrastructure of China (http://geodata.nnu.edu.cn/, accessed on 1 July 2024)”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Opinions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council on Strengthening Aging Work in the New Era. 2021. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-11/24/content_5653181.htm (accessed on 1 July 2024).
  2. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Population Ageing 2019; United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. Blome, A.; Keck, W.; Alber, J. Family and the Welfare State in Europe: Intergenerational Relations in Ageing Societies. In Family and the Welfare State in Europe; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2009; ISBN 978-1-84980-187-4. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mason, A.; Lee, R. Population Aging and the Generational Economy: Key Findings. In Population Aging and the Generational Economy; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2011; ISBN 978-0-85793-058-3. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rouzet, D.; Sánchez, A.C.; Renault, T.; Roehn, O. Fiscal Challenges and Inclusive Growth in Ageing Societies. OECD Econ. Policy Pap. 2019, 27, 1–69. [Google Scholar]
  6. Araujo de Carvalho, I.; Epping-Jordan, J.; Pot, A.M.; Kelley, E.; Toro, N.; Thiyagarajan, J.A.; Beard, J.R. Organizing Integrated Health-Care Services to Meet Older People’s Needs. Bull World Health Organ 2017, 95, 756–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lewis, B.; Purser, K.; Mackie, K. Health and Aged Care. In The Human Rights of Older Persons: A Human Rights-Based Approach to Elder Law; Lewis, B., Purser, K., Mackie, K., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 275–316. ISBN 978-981-15-6735-3. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhan, H.; Xizhe, P. Strategic Changes and Policy Choices in the Governance of China’s Aging Society. Soc. Sci. China 2020, 41, 185–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chang, M.-C.; Hu, J.-L.; Liu, C.-W. A Regional Efficiency Assessment of Long-Term Care Services in Taiwan. Systems 2024, 12, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ionescu, G.H.; Firoiu, D.; Manda, A.-M.; Pîrvu, R.; Jianu, E.; Antoniu, M.-E. Progress towards the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals for EU Urban Communities (SDG11). Sustainability 2024, 16, 4513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council Issued the “National Medium- and Long-Term Plan for Proactively Responding to Population Aging”. 2019. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-11/21/content_5454347.htm (accessed on 16 July 2024).
  12. Guo, J.; Chen, T.; Zhai, D. Scientific Connotation, Times Value and Practice Path of the National Strategy in Proactive Response to Population Aging. Forw. Position 2022, 03, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, W.; Li, D.S.; Hu, H.; Hu, S.L. The spatial pattern and influencing factors of the pension industry in Yangtze River Delta. World Reg. Stud. 2024, 33, 123–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, W.; Zhang, T.; Xie, X.; Huang, Z. Regional Low Carbon Development Pathways for the Yangtze River Delta Region in China. Energy Policy 2021, 151, 112172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, S.; Chen, P.; Peng, W. Environmental Assessment of Regional Cooperative Elderly Care: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta. Econ. Change Restruct. 2023, 56, 3979–4007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huang, J. A Comparative Study of Smart Elderly Care Policies in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China: A Policy Quantitative Analysis Based on the Subject-Objective-Tool Framework. J. Inf. Resour. Manag. 2020, 10, 122–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, W.; Ma, L.; Hou, M.; Bao, L. Research on the Integration of the Yangtze River Delta Regional Integra-tion and Elderly Care Development Mechanism. Mod. Econ. Explor. 2018, 04, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Te, M. Research on the Regional Integration of Elderly Care Services under the Yangtze River Delta Integration. Macroecon. Manag. 2019, 08, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, J. Research on the Coordinated Development Mechanism of the Yangtze River Delta from a Global Perspective. People’s Forum Acad. Front. 2015, 18, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cheng, T.; Liu, C.; Yang, H.; Wang, N.; Liu, Y. From Service Capacity to Spatial Equity: Exploring a Multi-Stage Decision-Making Approach for Optimizing Elderly-Care Facility Distribution in the City Centre of Tianjin, China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 85, 104076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Leung, M.; Famakin, I.O.; Olomolaiye, P. Effect of Facilities Management Components on the Quality of Life of Chinese Elderly in Care and Attention Homes. Facilities 2017, 35, 270–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Song, Y.; Scales, K.; Anderson, R.A.; Wu, B.; Corazzini, K.N. Resident Challenges with Daily Life in Chinese Long-Term Care Facilities: A Qualitative Pilot Study. Geriatr. Nurs. 2018, 39, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Talukder, M.D.S.; Sorwar, G.; Bao, Y.; Ahmed, J.U.; Palash, M.D.A.S. Predicting Antecedents of Wearable Healthcare Technology Acceptance by Elderly: A Combined SEM-Neural Network Approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2020, 150, 119793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shepperd, S.; Butler, C.; Cradduck-Bamford, A.; Ellis, G.; Gray, A.; Hemsley, A.; Khanna, P.; Langhorne, P.; Mort, S.; Ramsay, S.; et al. Is Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Admission Avoidance Hospital at Home an Alternative to Hospital Admission for Older Persons? Ann. Intern. Med. 2021, 174, 889–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Newman, M.G.; Zainal, N.H. The Value of Maintaining Social Connections for Mental Health in Older People. Lancet Public Health 2020, 5, e12–e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Blazer, D. Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults—A Mental Health/Public Health Challenge. JAMA Psychiatry 2020, 77, 990–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ma, X.; Tian, Y.; Du, M.; Hong, B.; Lin, B. How to Design Comfortable Open Spaces for the Elderly? Implications of Their Thermal Perceptions in an Urban Park. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 768, 144985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Frochen, S.; Ailshire, J.; Rodnyansky, S. Residential Care in Los Angeles: Evaluating the Spatial Distribution of Facilities and Neighbourhood Access to Care among Older Adults. Local Environ. 2019, 24, 274–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Huang, X.; Gong, P.; White, M.; Zhang, B. Research on Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Pension Resources in Shanghai Community-Life Circle. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11, 518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wan, D.; Liu, H.; Guo, J.; Guo, L.; Qi, D.; Zhang, S.; Li, P.; Fukuda, H. Spatial Distribution and Accessibility Measurements for Elderly Day Care Centers in China’s Urban Built-up Area: The Case of Tianjin Nankai District. Buildings 2022, 12, 1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, F.; Zhou, J.; Wei, W.; Yin, L. Spatial Distribution Pattern and Evolution Characteristics of Elderly Population in Wuhan Based on Census Data. Land 2023, 12, 1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sherman, J.E.; Spencer, J.; Preisser, J.S.; Gesler, W.M.; Arcury, T.A. A Suite of Methods for Representing Activity Space in a Healthcare Accessibility Study. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2005, 4, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jeang, B.-W.; Sun, X.; Wu, X.; Hsu, W.-L. Applying Big Data of Geographic Information to Analyze the Accessibility of Elderly Care Institutions. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 3rd Eurasia Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Healthcare and Sustainability (ECBIOS), Tainan, China, 28–30 May 2021; pp. 251–254. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wei, L.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, L. Identifying Accessibility and Equity Defects of Elderly Care Services in Developing Countries: Insights From Xiamen City. J. Nurs. Manag. 2024, 2024, 9340456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Groß, M.; Rendtel, U.; Schmid, T.; Schmon, S.; Tzavidis, N. Estimating the Density of Ethnic Minorities and Aged People in Berlin: Multivariate Kernel Density Estimation Applied to Sensitive Georeferenced Administrative Data Protected Via Measurement Error. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A Stat. Soc. 2017, 180, 161–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zainol, R.; Pettit, C.J. Elderly and community health care facilities: A spatial analysis. Plan. Malays. J. 2016, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, X.; Li, C.; Huang, Y. Spatial-Temporal Analysis of Urban-Rural Differences in the Development of Elderly Care Institutions in China. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 1086388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Comber, A.; Dickie, J.; Jarvis, C.; Phillips, M.; Tansey, K. Locating Bioenergy Facilities Using a Modified GIS-Based Location–Allocation-Algorithm: Considering the Spatial Distribution of Resource Supply. Appl. Energy 2015, 154, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Page, N.; Langford, M.; Higgs, G. Measuring Spatial Accessibility to Services within Indices of Multiple Deprivation: Implications of Applying an Enhanced Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (E2SFCA) Approach. Appl. Spat. Anal. 2019, 12, 321–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yu, P.; Jian, I.Y.; Yung, E.H.K.; Chan, E.H.W.; Wong, M.S.; Chen, Y. Spatial Vertical Equity in Public General Hospitals: Towards a Sustainable Healthcare System. Land 2023, 12, 1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cheng, L.; Yang, M.; De Vos, J.; Witlox, F. Examining Geographical Accessibility to Multi-Tier Hospital Care Services for the Elderly: A Focus on Spatial Equity. J. Transp. Health 2020, 19, 100926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guida, C.; Carpentieri, G. Quality of Life in the Urban Environment and Primary Health Services for the Elderly during the Covid-19 Pandemic: An Application to the City of Milan (Italy). Cities 2021, 110, 103038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vlaeyen, E.; Stas, J.; Leysens, G.; Van der Elst, E.; Janssens, E.; Dejaeger, E.; Dobbels, F.; Milisen, K. Implementation of Fall Prevention in Residential Care Facilities: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2017, 70, 110–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Higgs, G.; Langford, M.; Llewellyn, M. Towards an Understanding of Inequalities in Accessing Residential and Nursing Home Provision: The Role of Geographical Approaches. Health Soc. Care Community 2022, 30, 2218–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sagara, T.; Takase, M.; Sugiura, K.; Nakamoto, I.; Ma, P.; Muto, Y.; Higashi, K.; Fujiwara, Y.; Murayama, H. Current conditions and challenges of employing older assistant care workers based on geriatric health services facilities’ scale. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi 2024, 71, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, M.; Peng, P.; Zhu, H.; Ao, Y.; Zhou, Z. Exploring the Equitable Spatial Planning on the Accessibility of Institutional Elderly Care in Megacity: A Study Based on Chengdu, China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 117, 105998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kumari, M.; Sarma, K.; Sharma, R. Using Moran’s I and GIS to Study the Spatial Pattern of Land Surface Temperature in Relation to Land Use/Cover around a Thermal Power Plant in Singrauli District, Madhya Pradesh, India. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2019, 15, 100239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, Z.; Zhao, H.; Li, S.; Chen, Y.; Yao, E. Understanding Evolution Process of Community-Embedded Elderly Care Facilities with Big Data: A Spatiotemporal Analytical Framework. Trans. Urban Data Sci. Technol. 2022, 1, 142–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sage Journals: Discover World-Class Research. Available online: https://journals.sagepub.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1177%2F27541231221136406&mobileUi=0 (accessed on 13 September 2024).
  50. Zhang, C.; Xiao, D.; Huang, Y. Spatial Differentiation and Influencing Factors of Beautiful Village in Guangzhou. Trop. Geogr. 2020, 40, 551–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guo, M. Spatial Difference and Dynamic Evolution of Chinese Brand Development. J. Quant. Technol. 2020, 37, 165–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, M.; Wang, Z.; Xie, L.; Li, Q. The Spatiotemporal Pattern Evolution and Formation Mechanism of High-Quality Development in Central China. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2023, 78, 859–876. [Google Scholar]
  53. Xin, H.; Bu, C. Research on Spatial Pattern Change of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Services based on Standard Deviation Ellipse Analysis. J. Hebei Univ. Econ. Bus. Compr. Ed. 2018, 18, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, Q.; Tian, Q. Spatial Distribution of Pension Institutions in Shanghai Based on the Perspective of Wisdom Grade. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2023, 12, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lv, T.; Wang, L.; Zhang, X.; Xie, H.; Lu, H.; Li, H.; Liu, W.; Zhang, Y. Coupling Coordinated Development and Exploring Its Influencing Factors in Nanchang, China: From the Perspectives of Land Urbanization and Population Urbanization. Land 2019, 8, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Guo, D.; Wang, D.; Zhong, X.; Yang, F.; Yang, Y.; Jia, H. The Coupling Coordination and Interaction Mechanism of Land Ecological Security and High-Quality Economic Development in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, Z.; Gong, J.; Ma, H.; Zhang, J. The Spatial and Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of the Coupling and Coordinated Development of Basic Public Services, Urbanization, and Tourism in China. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhu, Y.; Jiao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Huo, X. Sustainable Development of Urban Metro System: Perspective of Coordination between Supply and Demand. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, C.; Wu, J.; Huang, Y. Spatial-Temporal Patterns and Coupling Characteristics of Rural Elderly Care Institutions in China: Sustainable Human Settlements Perspective. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wu, J.; Sun, W. Regional Integration and Sustainable Development in the Yangtze River Delta, China: Towards a Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda. Land 2023, 12, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ross, C.; Reeve, N. Survey and Census Methods: Population Distribution and Density. Field Lab. Methods Primatol. 2003, 6, 90–109. [Google Scholar]
  62. Perc, M. The Matthew Effect in Empirical Data. J. R. Soc. Interface 2014, 11, 20140378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pinch, S. Worlds of Welfare: Understanding the Changing Geographies of Social Welfare Provision; Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  64. Smith, D.M. Human Geography: A Welfare Approach; Edward Arnold: London, UK, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  65. Soja, E.W. Seeking Spatial Justice; University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, MI, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  66. Harvey, D. Social Justice and the City; Edward Arnold: Maidenhead, UK, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  67. Martin, R.; Sunley, P. Path Dependence and Regional Economic Evolution. J. Econ. Geogr. 2006, 6, 395–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gough, J. Regional development strategies: A European perspective. Political Geogr. 1998, 17, 121–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Robins, L.; Dovers, S. NRM Regions in Australia: The ‘Haves’ and the ‘Have Nots’. Geogr. Res. 2007, 45, 273–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ebrahimi, Z.; Eklund, K.; Dahlin-Ivanoff, S.; Jakobsson, A.; Wilhelmson, K. Effects of a Continuum of Care Intervention on Frail Elders’ Self-Rated Health, Experiences of Security/Safety and Symptoms: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Nord. J. Nurs. Res. 2017, 37, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hsieh, P.L.; Wang, S.H.; Chen, C.M.; Wake, J.; Yeh, C.C. Community Integrated Support Centers: The Experience of Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan. J. Nurs. 2016, 63, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hoe, S.L. Defining a Smart Nation: The Case of Singapore. J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc. 2016, 14, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hwang, Y.; Bae, H. The First Pilot Study on Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardiac Electronic Devices in South Korea: Rationale and Study Protocol of a REMOTE-CARE; Research Square: Rockville, MD, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 2. Methodological framework.
Figure 2. Methodological framework.
Land 14 00723 g002
Figure 3. Map of the Yangtze River Delta study area (based on National 146 1:1,000,000 Basic Geographic Data) (https://www.getwemap.com, accessed on 18 July 2024).
Figure 3. Map of the Yangtze River Delta study area (based on National 146 1:1,000,000 Basic Geographic Data) (https://www.getwemap.com, accessed on 18 July 2024).
Land 14 00723 g003
Figure 4. Degree of population ageing in various districts and counties in the Yangtze River Delta: (a) 2010 census data; (b) 2020 census data.
Figure 4. Degree of population ageing in various districts and counties in the Yangtze River Delta: (a) 2010 census data; (b) 2020 census data.
Land 14 00723 g004
Figure 5. Spatial distribution of the number of elderly care facilities (ECF) and beds in the Yangtze River Delta in 2020: (a) Spatial distribution of the number of elderly care facilities in the Yangtze River Delta, (b) spatial distribution of the number of beds in the Yangtze River Delta.
Figure 5. Spatial distribution of the number of elderly care facilities (ECF) and beds in the Yangtze River Delta in 2020: (a) Spatial distribution of the number of elderly care facilities in the Yangtze River Delta, (b) spatial distribution of the number of beds in the Yangtze River Delta.
Land 14 00723 g005
Figure 6. Spatial distribution of urban–rural ratios of elderly care facilities and beds in the Yangtze River Delta: (a) Elderly care facilities, (b) beds.
Figure 6. Spatial distribution of urban–rural ratios of elderly care facilities and beds in the Yangtze River Delta: (a) Elderly care facilities, (b) beds.
Land 14 00723 g006
Figure 7. Comparison of urban–rural elderly care facilities and beds in the Yangtze River Delta: (a) Elderly care facilities, (b) beds(each rectangle corresponds to a specific second-tier administrative division, such as cities or districts, depending on the provincial structure).
Figure 7. Comparison of urban–rural elderly care facilities and beds in the Yangtze River Delta: (a) Elderly care facilities, (b) beds(each rectangle corresponds to a specific second-tier administrative division, such as cities or districts, depending on the provincial structure).
Land 14 00723 g007
Figure 8. Kernel density analysis of elderly care facilities from 2000 to 2020: (a) 2000, (b) 2010, (c) 2020.
Figure 8. Kernel density analysis of elderly care facilities from 2000 to 2020: (a) 2000, (b) 2010, (c) 2020.
Land 14 00723 g008
Figure 9. Standard deviation ellipse analysis of elderly care facilities from 2000 to 2020.
Figure 9. Standard deviation ellipse analysis of elderly care facilities from 2000 to 2020.
Land 14 00723 g009
Figure 10. Changes in the percentage of elderly facilities by size.
Figure 10. Changes in the percentage of elderly facilities by size.
Land 14 00723 g010
Figure 11. Supply and demand index of elderly care facility services in the Yangtze River Delta: (a) Comprehensive supply evaluation index (CSEI), (b) comprehensive demand evaluation index (CDEI).
Figure 11. Supply and demand index of elderly care facility services in the Yangtze River Delta: (a) Comprehensive supply evaluation index (CSEI), (b) comprehensive demand evaluation index (CDEI).
Land 14 00723 g011
Figure 12. Coupling coordination of supply and demand for elderly care facility services and LISA clustering in the Yangtze River Delta in 2020: (a) Coupling coordination of supply and demand, (b) LISA (Local Indicators of Spatial Association) clustering.
Figure 12. Coupling coordination of supply and demand for elderly care facility services and LISA clustering in the Yangtze River Delta in 2020: (a) Coupling coordination of supply and demand, (b) LISA (Local Indicators of Spatial Association) clustering.
Land 14 00723 g012
Table 1. Aging society stages.
Table 1. Aging society stages.
Stage of AgingPercentage Range
Not Yet Entered the Aging Society Stage0–7%
Entered the Mildly Aging Society Stage7–10%
Entered the Moderately Aging Society Stage10–14%
Entered the Deeply Aging Society Stage14–20%
Entered the Super-Aged Society Stage20% and above
Table 2. Global Moran’s Index calculation results (99% confidence level).
Table 2. Global Moran’s Index calculation results (99% confidence level).
Category ValueValue
Moran’s I0.51
Z-Value11.99
p-Value<0.001
Table 3. Nearest neighbor index for different years.
Table 3. Nearest neighbor index for different years.
YearNNIZ-Valuep-Value
20000.86−8.61<0.001
20100.89−10.49<0.001
20200.76−38.90<0.001
Table 4. Supply and demand indicators for elderly care facilities services.
Table 4. Supply and demand indicators for elderly care facilities services.
System LayerPrimary IndicatorSecondary IndicatorIndicator AttributeWeight
SupplyElderly Care FacilitiesNumber of Elderly Care Facilities+0.12
Number of Elderly Care Beds+0.12
Number of Elderly Care Beds per 1000 People+0.07
Density of Elderly Care Facilities+0.69
DemandElderly Care Facilities
Elderly Population+0.13
Proportion of Elderly Population+0.06
Density of Elderly Population+0.72
TrafficRoad Network Density+0.09
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, H.; Shao, H.; Li, Y.; Guan, M.; Tong, J. GIS-Based Analysis of Elderly Care Facility Distribution and Supply–Demand Coordination in the Yangtze River Delta. Land 2025, 14, 723. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14040723

AMA Style

Hu H, Shao H, Li Y, Guan M, Tong J. GIS-Based Analysis of Elderly Care Facility Distribution and Supply–Demand Coordination in the Yangtze River Delta. Land. 2025; 14(4):723. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14040723

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Huihua, Hua Shao, Yang Li, Mengfan Guan, and Jiaxing Tong. 2025. "GIS-Based Analysis of Elderly Care Facility Distribution and Supply–Demand Coordination in the Yangtze River Delta" Land 14, no. 4: 723. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14040723

APA Style

Hu, H., Shao, H., Li, Y., Guan, M., & Tong, J. (2025). GIS-Based Analysis of Elderly Care Facility Distribution and Supply–Demand Coordination in the Yangtze River Delta. Land, 14(4), 723. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14040723

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop