Next Article in Journal
The Living Palimpsest Profile: An Integrated Assessment Framework for Vernacular Rural Settlements
Previous Article in Journal
Heritage Corridor Construction in the Sui–Tang Grand Canal’s Henan Section Based on the Minimum Cumulative Resistance (MCR) Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Institutional Shifts in Urban Park Management Policies: A Policy Arrangement Approach to Apartment Construction in Korean Parks

1
Landscape Architecture Major, Sunchon National University, 255, Junang-ro, Suncheon-si 57922, Jeollanam-do (Seokhyeon-Dong), Republic of Korea
2
Department of Landscape Architecture, Chonnam National University, 77 Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2025, 14(11), 2129; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14112129 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 4 September 2025 / Revised: 15 October 2025 / Accepted: 24 October 2025 / Published: 26 October 2025

Abstract

This study investigates the institutional dynamics behind the phenomenon of apartment construction within urban parks in South Korea, using the Policy Arrangement Approach (PAA) as an analytical framework. By comparing two landmark policies—the Citizens Apartments Construction Project (CACP69) of 1969 and the Private Park Special Project (PPSP09) initiated in 2009—it will reveal how park erosion has been legitimized through shifting governance structures, legal mechanisms, and discursive strategies. CACP69 emerged under authoritarian rule to address housing shortages, leveraging public authority to repurpose park land. In contrast, PPSP09 reflects neoliberal tendencies, incentivizing private capital to develop unexecuted park sites amid looming sunset clauses. Both cases illustrate how the long-term neglect of park creation and ambiguous legal definitions have enabled the commodification of public green spaces. The study argues that park management policies in Korea have been shaped by a property-rights-oriented logic, sidelining community participation and ecological integrity. These findings offer critical insights into the intersection of urban planning, environmental governance, and the privatization of public space.
Keywords: long-term uncreated parks; privatization; public and private conflict; housing development; park management; urban park erosion long-term uncreated parks; privatization; public and private conflict; housing development; park management; urban park erosion

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oh, C.; Park, S. Institutional Shifts in Urban Park Management Policies: A Policy Arrangement Approach to Apartment Construction in Korean Parks. Land 2025, 14, 2129. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14112129

AMA Style

Oh C, Park S. Institutional Shifts in Urban Park Management Policies: A Policy Arrangement Approach to Apartment Construction in Korean Parks. Land. 2025; 14(11):2129. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14112129

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oh, Changsong, and Sangwook Park. 2025. "Institutional Shifts in Urban Park Management Policies: A Policy Arrangement Approach to Apartment Construction in Korean Parks" Land 14, no. 11: 2129. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14112129

APA Style

Oh, C., & Park, S. (2025). Institutional Shifts in Urban Park Management Policies: A Policy Arrangement Approach to Apartment Construction in Korean Parks. Land, 14(11), 2129. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14112129

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop