The Multidisciplinary Approach in the Study of Landscape Evolution: The Fluvial Capture of the San Donato Creek (Gubbio, Central Italy), an Example of Hydrological Regime and Hydrogeological Risk Changes

Abstract

Historical maps, especially those at a small scale and rich in detail (e.g., the old “Cadastres”), represent an exceptionally important tool for understanding the recent historical evolution of landscapes. The note describes the example of the territory of Gubbio, in Umbria (Central Italy), where a map from the end of the 16th century shows a drawing of the hydrographic network partially different from the current one. A multidisciplinary study based on field surveys, observations of satellite images, archaeological discoveries, and archival research proved useful to confirm what was reported by the cartographer at the time. The possible causes that led to this variation of the surface hydrography up to its current configuration are then discussed in the light of other documentary finds from the archives, taken from the chronicles of the time, which have made it possible to identify, with sufficient approximation, the period where this change occurred. All this leads to a highlighting of a profound evolution of fluvial and slope morphogenetic processes that have affected the study area in recent centuries, in which the regulation of surface waters and afforestation, conducted during the 20th century, have played a decisive role.

1. Introduction

The study of landscape evolution, especially in the case of areas characterized by anthropic presence since ancient times, requires a multidisciplinary approach due to the great variety of sources to be used (historical maps, archival documents, field investigation data both geological-geomorphological and archaeological, the latter being connected with anthropological aspects). The morphogenetic processes often underwent changes in historical times, almost always induced by human activity, i.e., the upsets of the hydrographic network due to the building of dams and the hydraulic works in the riverbeds and hydrographic basins, conducted mainly during the 19th and 20th centuries [1,2,3,4]; the land use change from forest to agriculture, or from agriculture to urbanization [5,6,7]. These interventions have frequently led to a mitigation of the hydrogeological risk but, at times, also to its increase [8,9,10,11,12].

Historical cartographic documents have been an important source of data for identifying the changes, natural and/or induced, which have characterized the evolution of the landscape over the last few centuries [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Among these, large-scale and handwritten administrative maps are particularly useful, as they constitute the most reliable and rich in content original sources compared to printed maps [20]. In Italy, for example, between the end of the 18th and the beginning of the 19th century, various “Cadastres” were produced which, although they only report information of a planimetric type, provide excellent information, especially about the configuration of streams, before the important hydraulic works that significantly modified the planimetric track of the streams themselves. The Napoleonic Cadastre was published in 1812 for northern Italy. The Gregorian Cadastre (1816–1835) and the Lorraine Cadastre (1776–1832) were published for central Italy; the Bourbon Cadastre, also created in the first half of the 19th century were published for southern Italy. Furthermore, modern territorial analysis techniques that use geographic information systems (GIS) allow comparisons between historical maps and the current conformation of natural and man-made environments with a high degree of accuracy [21,22,23,24].

This study describes an emblematic case that highlights the importance of historical cartographic analysis in understanding the recent evolution of the landscape. One of the main and oldest historical maps of the territory of Gubbio (Umbria, Central Italy) was examined; according to scholars, this is the first example of the use of mapping for demographic survey purposes [25]. From the map, dated to the 16th century, albeit stylized, a hydrographic network emerges within the plain of Gubbio, which is partially different from the current one. This induced research includes the use of a field survey of geomorphological clues and historical finds. It also prompted the analysis of documents and other subsequent cartographic sources of causes that may have produced the transformation of the hydrographic network itself up to its current configuration. The identification of these causes implies that the recognition of morphogenetic processes is significantly different from those in progress today, with the consequent modifications of the hydrogeological risk conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

The Gubbio basin (Umbria, Central Italy) is examined, of which the geological-geomorphological peculiarities are described below, as well as the “Georgi’s Map” (1570), one of the most important historical cartographic documents, which is specifically the object of the note.

2.1. Geological-Geomorphological Framework of the Study Area

To understand the evolution of the landscape in the study area, it is essential to refer to its geological-structural characteristics, which have strongly controlled the “footprint” of the landscape itself, as normally occurs in areas affected by recent tectonics. Indeed, the Gubbio Plain represents one of the classic intermontane basins located on the western side of the Apennine Chain in Central Italy (Figure 1) [26].

This is a fold mountain belt, verging towards the Adriatic Sea, which was formed due to compressive tectonic induced by the counterclockwise rotation of the Italian peninsula. The compressive tectonic phase, still underway on the eastern (Adriatic) side of the chain, was superimposed in a spatial-temporal sense by an extensional phase of crustal thinning which produced the formation of tectonic trenches, i.e., graben and semi-graben [27,28,29,30]. The Apennine intermontane basins—of which that of Gubbio is the most recent and easternmost, together with Gualdo Tadino—represent the geomorphological expression of this extensional tectonic phase which begun in the Pliocene and still affects the western slope of the Apennine Chain. It is thus responsible for the seismicity present in this area [31,32,33].

The two tectonic phases have left evident traces in the territory of Gubbio. The compressive phase produced the formation of a brachyanticline (Figure 2) [34], where the marine environment formations, mainly calcareous and calcareous-marly (dating from the Jurassic to the Miocene) of the Umbria-Marche stratigraphic series, outcrop and today constitute the structure of the relief that overlooks the city.

The extensional phase was superimposed from the previous one, cutting the aforesaid anticline precisely in correspondence with its nucleus via an important normal fault [35]. It produced a large tectonic trench, i.e., the Gubbio Plain, which spans about 24 km in a NW-SE direction. The subsidence of this basin, with endorheic characteristics, initially allowed the formation of a lake, in the Plio-Pleistocene age, subsequently drained and filled by sediments in lacustrine and fluvial-lacustrine facies transported by streams flowing from both sides (north-eastern and south-western) of the basin itself [36,37]. The establishment of the graben generated a local base level of erosion for all these rivers which, from the area in subsidence, began their process of regressive erosion [38]. The result, from the geomorphological point of view, is the alignment of a series of reliefs (Gubbio Mountains), structurally constituted by what remains of the anticline fold and divided from each other by narrow valleys, produced from the streams that flow into the Gubbio Plain forming large alluvial fans (Figure 3) [39].

There are concerns regarding the hydrographic network in the Gubbio Plain. It is bordered to the NW and SW, and at its ends, by two rivers: the Assino River, which drains at the northern portion of the plain, and the Chiascio River, which drains at its central-southern portion. The divide between the two basins is located properly inside the Gubbio Plain, in correspondence with the large, low-sloping alluvial fan formed by the San Donato Creek at its outlet in the plain area. This aspect is important and will be discussed later.

2.2. The Georgi’s Map

The “Georgi’s Map”—also titled “Diocese della città di Ugubbio, descritta dal R.mo don Ubaldo Georgii clerico Eugubino. Ad istanza di monsignore Ill.mo Et Re.mo Mariano Savello vescovo dignissimo” (Figure 4)—was made in the second half of the 16th century and represents one of the most important historical cartographic documents of the Gubbio area. One specimen is kept in the Municipal Museum of Gubbio (inv. No. 2414 (6505)). It consists of two copper plates, each measuring 475 × 680 mm, and owes its origin to the decisions taken within the Council of Trent (1563) during which a document was approved asking parish priests to draw up a status animarum of their own parish through a real demographic census [25,40,41,42,43].

In 1567, the bishop of Gubbio (mons. Mariano Savelli) ordered all parish priests of the Diocese to indicate the number of families belonging to their own parish and the distances that separated them from their respective churches. In 1570, the bishop commissioned the cleric don Ubaldo Georgi, who was considered to be an excellent geographer [44], to graphically transpose all the information received. From the data found by Allegrucci [25], it can be deduced that in 1571 Georgi went to Venice with the design of the map and stayed there for a year to have the map engraved; the “coppers” were then brought to Gubbio.

The document, a real topographic map, depicts a relatively large territory, at a scale of extreme detail for the period in which it was drawn up (normally, the maps of this period are at a significantly smaller scale), and it is also a thematic map, considering that it represents the population of the Diocese. In fact, the territory is divided into squares and rectangles, each of which delimits, albeit approximately, the various parish districts. The particularity of the map consists in the fact that it represents a unicum, as in no other Diocese the surveys promoted by the Council of Trent were graphically converted into a map. Furthermore, it represents the first cartography created specifically in the Gubbio area.

2.3. The Anomaly of the Hydrographic Network Represented in the Georgi’s Map

By carefully examining Georgi’s Map, a substantial difference in the hydrographic network represented by the cartographer compared to the current situation can be observed. The map, in its lower portion, represents the plain of Gubbio, bordered on the right (SE) by the Chiascio River and on the left (NW) by the Assino River. The divide between the two hydrographic catchments, which drain towards the Assino and Chiascio Rivers, respectively, is moved much more to the left (NW) than the current one, so much so that, to the NW of the town of Gubbio, the San Donato Creek, although represented in a stylized way, unequivocally flows into the Saonda River, a tributary of the Chiascio River. Currently, it is an integral part of the hydrographic network which belongs to the Assino River. The same applies to a minor tributary, the creek located between Nerbisci and S. Martino in Colle, on the opposite side of the Gubbio basin: it too, today flowing into the San Donato stream, is represented in Georgi’s Map as a tributary of the Saonda River (Figure 5).

An error by the cartographer can reasonably be excluded, considering the extreme detail with which the natural and anthropic elements are represented and above all the proximity of the place to the city of Gubbio (therefore in an area that is not impervious and easily accessible). The problem then arises of the search for clues, from land and documents, which testify to the presence of a fluvial track of the San Donato Creek different from the current one, as well as the causes and the period in which the diversion, which led to the present situation, may have occurred.

2.4. The Data Available

The study was carried out following two lines of research: (1) The field investigation, which attempted to search for geomorphological clues and archaeological finds that could highlight the presence of a fluvial track of the San Donato Creek different from the current one; (2) the search for archival material (cartographic and possibly documentary) on the subject.

2.4.1. The Field Investigation

The direct investigation in the field proved difficult, considering that the area in question has always been developed and is used mainly for agriculture. Therefore, there are no outcrops of autochthonous and unaltered material along the presumed ancient fluvial track of the San Donato Creek, which can be attributed to infill of sediments of fluvial origin.

On the other hand, the analysis of aerial photos proved to be more important and useful, from which it is possible to identify, through a wider aerial view, any indications of a paleo-riverbed. In fact, the identification of ancient river tracks, especially in lowland areas, is facilitated by the fact that the sub-surface channel deposits are clearly evident, above all following precipitation events, for the different colors they assume due to their degree of humidity and their permeability, different from the neighboring areas. Therefore, the search for aerial photos via Google Earth was very useful, exploiting its potential and above all the fact that the photos present refer to different periods (which can be inspected via the menu item “show historical images”). Among the photos available in this area, there is one in particular whose acquisition date is 29 May 2017. It shows with extraordinary evidence the indications of a drainage line placed along the San Donato Creek at its outlet in the plain of Gubbio, which most likely follows the ancient fluvial track of this stream, as reported in Georgi’s Map (Figure 6), i.e., directed towards the Saonda River.

Furthermore, there is another important element in favor of this interpretation. During the works carried out in 2014 for the construction of the new church of the Madonna del Ponte (church of the Mother of the Savior), today located precisely according to the direction of the presumed paleo-riverbed of the San Donato Creek, very interesting archaeological and geological data emerged. The preparatory excavation works for the construction of the new church have brought to light an ancient artifact consisting of a small chapel which had probably incorporated a pre-existing rural aedicule dating back to the 15th century (Figure 7). This is located close to the place where the old church of the Madonna del Ponte was built during the 16th century.

In particular, the excavations of 2014 highlighted the presence of a sedimentary body, which transversely cut the entire construction site at a depth of 0.5–1 m from ground level. This lithosome was clearly distinguishable from the neighboring alluvial sediments and consisted of well-processed pebbles with a good degree of rounding, with an average size of 6–8 cm (also used for the construction of the perimeter walls of the aedicule) in an abundant silty-sandy matrix (Figure 8).

The position of this sedimentary body, located right along the line of the hypothetical paleo-riverbed of the San Donato Creek, as represented by Georgi, and its lithological-sedimentary characteristics make the presence of a river channel probable in this area.

Currently, on the main altar of the church of the Madonna del Ponte, near the bridge over the San Donato Creek, there is a detached block fresco coming from the chapel described above. It is assumed that the aedicule, contained in it, was placed near the bank of the San Donato Creek to invoke protection from any damage that the stream could cause with its floods, as was the custom in that period and in the following centuries [45]. See, for example, the still present aedicule, located on the right bank of the Camignano River, near the bridge that crosses it in the San Martino district, within the historic center of Gubbio (Figure 9). The fresco in question (Figure 10) depicts the Madonna and Child enthroned between St. Bernardino and a holy bishop (perhaps St. Ubaldo or St. Donato) and is attributed to the Gubbio painter Jacopo Bedi who realized it shortly after the mid-15th century.

Some archival documents relating to Jacopo Bedi, dated between 1460 and 1478 [46], ensure that the painter owned land in the Villa of Spognola, located on the right bank of the San Donato Creek, near the bridge already called at that time “of San Donato”.

It cannot be excluded, though it is possible, that the majesty or the small chapel where the fresco was originally placed, was located precisely in one of the lands owned by the 15th-century painter from Gubbio near the San Donato bridge. Even the dimensions of the small building found in the area now occupied by the new church of the Mother of the Savior, especially those of its back wall, are compatible with those of the detached fresco (150 × 150 cm).

2.4.2. The Historical-Cartographic Investigation

Next, we analyzed historical maps subsequent to Georgi. We referred to the same area of study to search for the one closest in time to Georgi’s Map, in which the San Donato Creek was depicted in the position in which it is currently located. This was done to identify the time interval in which the diversion phenomenon of the San Donato Creek may have occurred. The maps examined are listed in

Table 1. The historical maps examined.

Title	Author	Year	Location	Notes
Tavola Nuova della Marca d’Ancona	Girolamo Ruscelli	1561	In: “Geographia” of Claudio Tolomeo	printed
Novo et vero dissegno della Marca di Ancona con li sui confini	Ferrando Bertelli	1565	British Museum, London	printed
Marcha Anconae olim Picenum	Abramo Ortelio	1572	Municipal Library of Fermo	printed
Urbini Ducatus	Egnatio Danti	1580–1582	Vatican Museums	wall painting
Marchia Anconitana cum Spoletano Ducatu	Gerhard Mercatore	1589	private collection	printed
Ducatus Urbini nova et exacta descriptio	Abramo Ortelio	1606	“Federiciana” Library of Fano	printed
Marca d’Ancona olim Picenum	Giovanni Antonio Magini	1620	“Oliveriana” Library of Pesaro	printed
Urbini Ducatus	Giovanni Antonio Magini	1620	“Federiciana” Library of Fano	printed
Gli Stati dei Serenissimi Duchi della Rovere	Francesco Mingucci	1626	Vatican manuscript code 4434	hand drawn
Urbini Ducatus	Jodoco Hondio	1627	“Federiciana” Library of Fano	printed
Stato d’Urbino	Marco Ferrante Gerlassa	circa 1630	National Gallery of Marche, Urbino	hand drawn
Ducato di Urbino	Henricus Hondius	1635	“Federiciana” Library of Fano	printed
Marchia Anconitana olim Picenum	Henricus Hondius	1640	Municipal Library of Civitanova Marche	printed
Legatione del Ducato d’Urbino	Filippo Titi	1697	“Federiciana” Library of Fano	printed
Marca d’Ancona	Vincenzo Coronelli	1708	Franciscan and Picene Historical Library of Falconara	printed
Provincia Piceni	Giovanni di Montecavallero	1711	Franciscan and Picene Historical Library of Falconara	printed
Marca Anconae, olim Picenum	Lasor a Varea	1713	“Federiciana” Library of Fano	printed
Ducato d’Urbino		1723	In: “Memorie istoriche concernenti la Devoluzione dello Stato di Urbino alla Santa Sede Apostolica” (Riveriana)	printed
Nuova Carta Geografica dello Stato Ecclesiastico	Ruđer Josip Bošković e Christoper Maire	1755	National Library of Florence	printed
Nuova Delineazione della Legazione di Urbino	Christoper Maire	1757	“Oliveriana” Library of Pesaro	printed
Catasto geometrico-particellare del territorio di Gubbio	Giuseppe Maria Ghelli	1768	State Archive Section of Gubbio	27 hand drawn maps and 48 “brogliardi” (descriptive registers)
Lo Stato della Chiesa	Antonio Zatta	1782	Franciscan and Picene Historical Library of Falconara	printed
Legazione d’Urbino e Governo di Città di Castello	Antonio Zatta	1783	Franciscan and Picene Historical Library of Falconara	printed
Catasto gregoriano	AA.VV.	1816–1835	State Archive of Perugia	unit 287, hand drawn

, in increasing order of age.

We found the examined cartography, which was produced before Georgi’s Map (1570), to be unhelpful, as it is not detailed enough to confirm that how the San Donato Creek flowed into the Saonda River (Chiascio River basin). These maps are drawn on too small a scale, which does not allow for a degree of detail that can correctly identify the hydrograph network of the Gubbio Plain (Figure 11).

Some maps produced after Georgi’s present the same problem because the Gubbio area is located on the edges of the cartographic representation and is therefore not well sketched (Figure 12). Others, which are in any case the majority, all show the San Donato Creek with a track like the current one, i.e., flowing into the Assino River (Figure 13). Among the latter, the closest in time to Georgi’s Map is “Urbini Ducatus” by Egnatio Danti, produced between 1580 and 1582 and preserved as a mural painting in Rome, in the Vatican Museums (Figure 14 and Figure 15).

3. Results

From the available field and historical-cartographic data, two important elements emerge. The first is that there are numerous clues of a geological and geomorphological nature linked to the discovery of architectural and pictorial finds, which seem to confirm what Georgi represented regarding a track of the San Donato Creek different from the current one. The second concerns the period in which this diversion of the track may have occurred. It can reasonably be assumed that this occurred between 1571 (the year Georgi went to Venice to have the “coppers” of his paper engraved, as reported by Allegrucci [25]) and 1582 (the year Danti finished his painting).

Some questions remain unresolved, such as what the causes are that could produce the modification of the river track—i.e., natural or anthropogenic causes?

The Causes of the Modification of the Fluvial Track of the San Donato Creek

The possibility of an error by Georgi in drawing the fluvial track of the San Donato Creek on his map can be excluded. This hypothesis, in fact, appears unlikely, both taking note of the recognized competence and professionalism of Georgi himself, and because the area was easily accessible even for those times, and just as directly “verifiable.” Furthermore, the purpose of the map must be considered: the abundance of details with which it was drawn up does not make credible that it could be an error, which would have been too obvious to remain unnoticed.

Two possible hypotheses remain:

• a “forced” deviation, artificially induced by hydraulic works in the riverbed, which would therefore have constrained it to modify its track;
• a natural cause, whereby the stream would have changed direction “spontaneously” caused by a flood event, such as often occur on alluvial fans (such as the one that the San Donato Creek forms), at their mouth on a plain.

The first of the two hypotheses mentioned above seems scarcely credible. In fact, no archival document has been found in the “Riformanze” contained in the Historical Archive of Gubbio (dating from 1326 to 1815, which faithfully report any works of public utility carried out in the area) that testify to the implementation of hydraulic works in that period. This was a period in which Gubbio, under the regency of the Della Rovere, was in a non-florid state of the municipality and its economy [47,48]. Furthermore, the reasons that would have led to carrying out works of this kind are absent (i.e., modifying a riverbed and making it flow towards another hydrographic basin). The drainage and rectification works of the riverbed of the San Donato Creek, as seen today, must have taken place no earlier than the 19th century. Graphic indications relating to a possible rectification project of some reaches, for hydraulic protection purposes, are already present in the Ghelli’s Cadastre (1768; Figure 16). The San Donato Creek still has a sinuous pattern; plans of adjustment of the San Donato Creek riverbed are present in the Gregorian Cadastre, affixed after the creation of the map, probably after 1880, when its maps were “redrawn” [49] (Figure 17).

Instead, the second hypothesis, which attributes the diversion of the San Donato Creek to natural causes, seems realistically not only possible but probable. The alluvial fan formed by the San Donato Creek has a morphology characterized by a gentle slope, the lowest found in the Gubbio Plain at the mouth of the streams which, crossing the Gubbio hills, form these systems. It is precisely this feature that makes the riverbed extremely mobile: in such cases, even a single flood is sufficient to cause a diversion of the track. It should also be remembered that the alluvial fan of the San Donato Creek, despite its gentle morphology, constitutes, within the Gubbio plain, a divide between the hydrographic basins of the Assino River and the Chiascio River: a diversion of a few degrees could easily have diverted the stream into one or the other catchment area. On the other hand, it is sufficient to observe any “active” fan (i.e., growing by sedimentation; Figure 18) to verify how diversions, even sensitive ones, of the feeder channel can occur very quickly, especially as alluvial fans have low slopes.

In essence, it would be that phenomenon which in geomorphology is defined as “river capture by spill (or overflow)” [50] (Figure 19): a stream, changing direction due to a sudden sedimentary input, can cause its waters to flow into a neighboring hydrographic basin that is different from the one in which it was located. Figure 20 shows an essential geomorphological map of the study area, where the San Donato fluvial perfectly follows what is reported in the sketch of Figure 19.

This remains the most probable hypothesis and seems to be supported by an archival document.

In “Memoirs” (written from 1557 to 1604) by don Paris Montanari, the Gubbio parish priest at the time, consulted in the State Historical Archive, Gubbio Section, it states “1571. I remember that on July 18th the River known as Camignano made a huge flood, and did huge damage by flooding houses and churches, and passed over the bridges of the city: the closest houses along the river, those above St. Biagio, those of the Market, the Macelli, and the Houses of Borgo: and the churches it flooded were St. Biagio, the Mastadella, St. Bernardino, St. Rocco, and the Monastery of Good Jesus: and it carried very large beams, a frightening and terrible thing: and I don Paris was in St. Belardino with some friends of mine”—(Sezione Archivio Storico di Gubbio i.e., State Historical Archive, Gubbio Section—SASG, Fondo Armanni, II.B.13).

The “river known as Camignano” is the one that crosses the city of Gubbio (Figure 3), parallel to, and a short distance from the San Donato Creek which, evidently, suffered the same effects.

Could this be the flood event that caused the diversion of the route? The date should also be noted: 18 July 1571, indicated by don Paris as the day on which the event occurred. Georgi must have already drawn up his map if, as Allegrucci says [25], precisely on that year the cartographer went to Venice to have the “coppers” of his work engraved.

Beyond the fact that the diversion of the San Donato Creek can be attributed to this specific event described by don Paris Montanari, documentary evidence highlights an important element, namely flood events in the streams that cross the Gubbio Mountains, were certainly present in that historical period (see also

Table 2. List of the most important flood events in the Gubbio area which are traced in the historical documentation. The most cited refer to the Camignano River, as it crosses the city of Gubbio, but the references often extend to the surrounding rivers.

Data	Fonte	Note
1388 ca.	Luongo [51], 1.11	Flood of Camignano River
18 July 1571	Montanari, Memorie [52]	Flood of Camignano River
20 October 1613	SASG, Fondo Pesci, n. 12, p. 696	Flood of Camignano River
25 August 1616	SASG, Fondo Pesci, b. 12, Effemeridi Orsaioli, p. 446	Great flood of San Donato Creek
September 1619	SASG, Fondo Pesci, n. 12, p. 505	Flood of Camignano River
3 June 1772	SASG, Fondo Comunale, Registri Parrocchiali (san Giovanni e sant’Agostino)	“per impetuosa pioggia si rompì […] il Bottaccione”; flood and damages in Gubbio, 9 dead
End of July, 1792	Cece, personal communication, 2020	Flood of Camignano River
8 September 1835	Lucarelli, Memorie [53], pp. 196–197	“Tutti i fiumi hanno straripato in modo tale che non vi era memoria di casi simili”; flood of Camignano River and other streams
18 September 1859	Lucarelli, Memorie [53], p. 344	“il debordamento de fiumi ha recato immensi danni non solo nelle campagne, ma benanche in città”; generalized floods
26 May 1866	ADG, Fondo del Capitolo dei Canonici, I.C. 21, p. 136	Flood of Camignano River

). This is no longer the case today, thanks to the works of hydraulic regulation of the running waters and the arrangement of the slopes carried out in later times.

As evidence that such flood events were frequent in the Gubbio Plain, the text of the epigraph is reported, affixed after two important alluvial events in Camignano River occurred. One occurred in the aedicule (already mentioned, located on the right bank of the Camignano River and the other in the district of San Martino, which is located within the historic center of Gubbio) (Figure 21). The citizens of Gubbio thank the effigy of the Madonna with the words, translated from the Italian: “To you, Great Virgin Help of Christians who, motionless in this poor location among the ruins of repeated floods in 1859 and 1866, wanted to save the lives of so many citizens in danger, the elite of the districts, as to a dear, most vigilant, compassionate mother, as a sign of filial gratitude, this memory they put.”

Such events could easily have ben produced between 1570 and 1582. The phenomenon of “capture by overflow” was identified based on the comparison between Georgi’s Map and the current situation.

4. Discussion

From the data and results described, different conditions and morphogenetic factors emerge between the period under consideration (16th century) and the current situation. Different from past periods, the streams flowing from the Gubbio Mountains towards the Gubbio basin present a regime strongly controlled by the riverbed and slope arrangements. This, presumably, only began in the last century, up to the paving of the Camignano River, which took place near the end of the 1970s (Figure 22).

Proof of this is the photographic evidence that, already from the 1800s and up to the 1950s, showed slopes bare of vegetation and affected by debris flows (Figure 23 and Figure 24), such as that of 1341, described by Luongo [38]. The detrital material easily poured into the streams, which presented a greater solid transport than the current one (Figure 25). Moreover, in the absence of regulation of rainwater and runoff on the slopes, the rivers were subject to sudden floods, causing frequent and severe damage to the structures and the resident population. Historical testimonies document these conditions of hydrogeological risk (Table 2).

From the point of view of hydraulic risk, the present situation is profoundly different. The afforestation carried out on the hills facing the city (Figure 26) has had the effect of greatly reducing the possibility of triggering debris flows and, above all, has increased the run-off time and the concentration time within the hydrographic basins of the streams flowing into the lowland area, effectively preventing the onset of catastrophic alluvial events such as the one described by don Paris Montanari in his memoirs. The channeling and construction of embankments in the river reaches of the plain have to be added (as well as the paving of the stream which crosses the city of Gubbio, the Camignano River), which have allowed for greater hydraulic efficiency of the outflow sections, thus avoiding inundation and flooding in the urban reaches.

Profound changes of the landscape, the evidence of which was made possible precisely by the historical-cartographic and documentary analysis.

5. Conclusions

Georgi’s Map, which depicts the territory of Gubbio (Umbria, Central Italy) at the end of the 16th century, shows a design of the hydrographic network that is partly different from the current one. In particular, the San Donato Creek, today a left tributary of the Assino River in the northern portion of the Gubbio basin, is represented in this map as a tributary of the Saonda River, which belongs to another hydrographic basin, that of the Chiascio River, which occupies the central-southern portion of the basin itself.

The investigation carried out through direct surveys in the field, also with the support of the observation of satellite images, seems to confirm what Georgi has represented. This hypothesis is also supported by other elements, thanks to the excavations carried out for the construction of a new cult building, precisely in the hypothetical direction of flow of the paleo-riverbed of the San Donato Creek. These, in fact, have brought to light a sedimentary body of evident fluvial origin and an archaeological find, in particular a votive aedicule, dating back to the 15th century, which are similar to those that are still present today along the banks of the streams in the territory.

Furthermore, the study has allowed us to hypothesize the period in which this variation of the hydrographic network may have occurred, and the causes that may have produced it.

About this period, the comparison between Georgi’s Map and the ones created subsequently allowed us to identify a precise time slice between 1570 (presumed date of creation of the Georgi’s Map) and 1582 (date in which it was completed the mural painting by Egnatio Danti, preserved in the Vatican Museums, which represents a drawing of the hydrographic network substantially like the current one).

With regard to the causes of the modification of the track of the San Donato Creek, this suggests natural processes, in particular a diversion of the stream (river capture by overflow) induced by an alluvial event. This seems to be confirmed by the chronicles of time that highlight more severe hydrogeological risk conditions, characterized by a higher frequency of flood events than the current situation.

Therefore, a substantial evolution of the morphogenetic processes (fluvial and slope) in the study area should be highlighted, due both to the afforestation carried out along the slopes of the Gubbio Mountains and to the numerous surface water regulation interventions, both carried out during the 20th century. These have greatly reduced erosion processes, the triggering of debris flows, and the consequent solid transport of the streams that drain the slopes of the Gubbio hills, contributing to a decisive mitigation of the hydrogeological risk connected to the flooding phenomena of the lowland area.

Therefore, the present study is an excellent example of the validity of a multidisciplinary study method in the reconstruction of landscape evolution in areas of ancient and persistent human presence.