Next Article in Journal
Conversion of Forest Hillslopes into Tea Fields Increases Soil Nutrient Losses through Surface Runoff
Previous Article in Journal
New Approaches to Modelling Wilderness Quality in Iceland
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mismatch in Urban Construction Land Use and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from China

1
School of Marxism, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
2
School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
3
College of Civil Engineering, Longdong University, Qingyang 745000, China
4
School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2023, 12(2), 447; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020447
Submission received: 20 December 2022 / Revised: 28 January 2023 / Accepted: 6 February 2023 / Published: 9 February 2023

Abstract

Seeking land use development strategies is an effective policy tool to support economic development, especially in developing countries. Previous studies evidence the indispensable role of urban construction land use (UCLU) in regional economic development. However, neglecting the two-stage characteristic and mismatch of UCLU could misinterpret the strategy. This study, considering a two-stage characteristic, aims to explore how land use development strategy affects economic development. First, we create a measure for UCLU mismatch. Second, using both linear and nonlinear models, we explore the possible relationship between the land use strategy and economic development. Subsequently, robustness and the potential path-dependent reinforcement loop (PDRL) are discussed further. Finally, the fundamental channels are investigated in the mechanism analysis section. The results confirm that temporary positive effects stimulate economic development, whereas permanent potential negative effects undermine robust economic development. In addition, the PDRL shows that irrational adoption of the strategy would mean succumbing to low- and medium-industries. We also find that land and capital demonstrate exogenous properties that function as visible hands, with economic regulation exploring UCLU mismatches and misallocation of resources. However, the overuse of these two policies could lead to an unhealthy cycle of mutually reinforcing adverse effects. Based on these findings, we propose policy recommendations to support the rational use of this strategy.
Keywords: land-use development; urban land development mismatch; resource misallocation; economic development; urban construction land use land-use development; urban land development mismatch; resource misallocation; economic development; urban construction land use

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, M.; Gao, J.; Du, Y.; Ren, P. Mismatch in Urban Construction Land Use and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from China. Land 2023, 12, 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020447

AMA Style

Lin M, Gao J, Du Y, Ren P. Mismatch in Urban Construction Land Use and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from China. Land. 2023; 12(2):447. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020447

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Mu, Jingxin Gao, Yongjie Du, and Pengyu Ren. 2023. "Mismatch in Urban Construction Land Use and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from China" Land 12, no. 2: 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020447

APA Style

Lin, M., Gao, J., Du, Y., & Ren, P. (2023). Mismatch in Urban Construction Land Use and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from China. Land, 12(2), 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020447

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop