Next Article in Journal
Industrial Spatio-Temporal Distribution of High-Speed Rail Station Area from the Accommodation Facilities Perspective: A Multi-City Comparison
Next Article in Special Issue
Local and Landscape Factors Influence Plant-Pollinator Networks and Bee Foraging Behavior across an Urban Corridor
Previous Article in Journal
An Integrated Approach to Constructing Ecological Security Pattern in an Urbanization and Agricultural Intensification Area in Northeast China
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Precariousness of Walloon Peri-Urban Agricultural Lands
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing Preferences for Cultural Ecosystem Services in the English Countryside Using Q Methodology

1
Faculty of Humanities, Charles University in Prague, U Kříže 8, 158 00 Prague, Czech Republic
2
School of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, College Road, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2023, 12(2), 331; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020331
Submission received: 25 November 2022 / Revised: 10 January 2023 / Accepted: 16 January 2023 / Published: 26 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rural–Urban Gradients: Landscape and Nature Conservation)

Abstract

Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) are difficult to assess due to the subjective and diverse way in which they are experienced. This can make it difficult to apply CES research to enhance human experience of nature. This study applies Q methodology to group people according to their preferences for CES. The Q methodology survey was carried out with 47 local residents and tourists in Wiltshire, in South West England. Four groups of respondents were identified drawing value from nature through: (1) spiritual benefits and mental well-being (Group 1—Inspired by nature); (2) nature and biodiversity conservation (Group 1—Conserving nature); (3) cultural heritage in multifunctional landscapes (Group 3—Countryside mix); and (4) opportunities for outdoor activities (Group 4—Outdoor pursuits). All four groups stated that benefits from nature were enhanced by actually visiting the countryside, through a better understanding of nature itself, and through a range of sensory experiences. They particularly identified relaxation opportunities as a very important CES benefit. These findings, and the demonstrated use of the Q methodology, could support local planning and landscape management in order to provide accessible and functional landscapes that can provide a range of different CES benefits to people.
Keywords: Q methodology; cultural ecosystem services; Wiltshire; multifunctional landscapes; nature’s contributions to people Q methodology; cultural ecosystem services; Wiltshire; multifunctional landscapes; nature’s contributions to people

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hubatova, M.; McGinlay, J.; Parsons, D.J.; Morris, J.; Graves, A.R. Assessing Preferences for Cultural Ecosystem Services in the English Countryside Using Q Methodology. Land 2023, 12, 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020331

AMA Style

Hubatova M, McGinlay J, Parsons DJ, Morris J, Graves AR. Assessing Preferences for Cultural Ecosystem Services in the English Countryside Using Q Methodology. Land. 2023; 12(2):331. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020331

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hubatova, Marie, James McGinlay, David J. Parsons, Joe Morris, and Anil R. Graves. 2023. "Assessing Preferences for Cultural Ecosystem Services in the English Countryside Using Q Methodology" Land 12, no. 2: 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020331

APA Style

Hubatova, M., McGinlay, J., Parsons, D. J., Morris, J., & Graves, A. R. (2023). Assessing Preferences for Cultural Ecosystem Services in the English Countryside Using Q Methodology. Land, 12(2), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020331

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop