Assessing the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Vegetation Coverage in Urban Built-Up Areas
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
I read the authors’ point-by-point responses,and believe the manuscript has
been significantly improved according to comments and suggestions of minor revision,so I now warrant the manuscript publication in land.
Author Response
Thank you for your recognition of our article, your recognition has given us great encouragement, which motivates us to continue exploring in new research directions. In addition, we resubmitted the manuscript according to the journal format requirements of Land.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
Thank you for submitting your paper to Journal of Sensors. I read carefully manuscript number: Land-2124053, the manuscript entitled: " Assessing the spatio-temporal dynamics of vegetation coverage in urban built-up areas ". The aim of current study was to assess the spatio-temporal dynamic of green space in built-up areas of 31 provincial capital cities from 1990 to 2020 by using of Landsat images. In my point of view, the result of this kind of research could be interesting and useful for many applications. Please check the English grammar. The English language is moderate. The language of the manuscript should be checked and improved greatly. Some sections of paper require major revisions before any further. I attached my reviewer supplementary comments in pdf file.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Thank you for your comments and suggestions. We have carefully revised the article based on the suggestions you provided, which has greatly improved the quality of our article. Below is our point-by-point response to your comments.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
Thank you for submitting your revised paper to Journal of Land. I read the revised manuscript number: land- 2124053, the manuscript entitled: " Assessing the spatiotemporal dynamics of vegetation coverage in urban built-up areas". The added information is important and useful and led to improving the manuscript. I accept the revised manuscript in this present form. I concur; the final decision is accepted for publication.
