Next Article in Journal
Impact of Transhumant Livestock Grazing Abandonment on Pseudo-Alpine Grasslands in Greece in the Context of Climatic Change
Previous Article in Journal
The Hornsby Quarry Geosite, NSW, Australia—A Geoheritage Treasure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spatial Analysis of Aridity during Grapevine Growth Stages in Extremadura (Southwest Spain)

by
Abelardo García-Martín
1,*,
Cristina Aguirado
1,
Luis L. Paniagua
1,
Virginia Alberdi
2,
Francisco J. Moral
2 and
Francisco J. Rebollo
3
1
Departamento de Ingeniería del Medio Agronómico y Forestal, Escuela de Ingenierías Agrarias, Universidad de Extremadura, Avda. Adolfo Suárez, s/n., 06007 Badajoz, Spain
2
Departamento de Expresión Gráfica, Escuela de Ingenierías Industriales, Universidad de Extremadura, Avda. de Elvas, s/n., 06006 Badajoz, Spain
3
Departamento de Expresión Gráfica, Escuela de Ingenierías Agrarias, Universidad de Extremadura, Avda. Adolfo Suárez, s/n., 06007 Badajoz, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2022, 11(12), 2125; https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122125
Submission received: 2 November 2022 / Revised: 18 November 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 25 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Land–Climate Interactions)

Abstract

:
Aridity is a key determinant of agriculture worldwide due to rising temperatures, rainfall variability, and drought frequency and intensity, amongst other factors. The De Martonne aridity index is particularly useful to evaluate the spatial and temporal variations in aridity in agricultural regions for characterising the climate of these areas and evaluating their susceptibility to climate change. From the mean precipitation and maximum–minimum daily temperature values recorded at 108 weather stations over 32 years (1989–2020) in Extremadura (southwest Spain), spatial analysis of aridity was performed at different grapevine growth stages. The present study aimed to (1) determine the mean aridity conditions in Extremadura according to year and growth stage and (2) assess aridity in six grapevine-growing areas of Ribera del Guadiana de Extremadura (Spain) protected designation of origin (PDO). To visualise aridity patterns, maps were generated using a geographic information system and a multivariate regression geostatistical algorithm (ordinary kriging). The climate of Extremadura is primarily Mediterranean at the annual scale, and aridity widely varies from extremely humid at the dormancy stage to arid at the berry development and ripening stages. This variation shapes the conditions of the studied grapevine-growing region. Furthermore, large differences were noted amongst the sub-areas of the Rivera del Guadiana PDO at the initial and final grapevine growth stages, requiring differential crop management. In addition, analysis according to growth stage allowed us to identify the most vulnerable areas and periods to climate change and potential grapevine-growing areas highly suitable for this climate.

1. Introduction

Climate is a determinant of many sectors, ranging from the economic to social sectors. One of the sectors most affected by climate is the economy and, more specifically, the agricultural sector. The agricultural sector is highly sensitive to climate because climatic conditions determine crop distribution and viability. Therefore, crop sustainability largely depends on climate [1]. Climate change has altered the optimal conditions for crops worldwide [2]. Therefore, the association between climate and agriculture has been and remains the subject of numerous studies (e.g., [1,2,3,4]).
Mediterranean Spain is characterised by a high spatial and temporal heterogeneity of water resources, and numerous areas are affected by water scarcity and frequent droughts [5].
The effects of climate change on the wine sector have raised great concern because both wine growing and production are sensitive to climate. The physiological behaviour of grapevines, as well as the ripening and organoleptic characteristics of berries, are strongly affected by temperature [6,7,8]. Meanwhile, the effect of precipitation on grapevines depends on the phenological stage. Although more precipitation is desirable during winter and at the beginning of the growing season [9], a lack of rainfall is conducive to ripening [10]. The effects of worsening water deficit and rising temperatures in Mediterranean vineyards have been extensively studied [11,12,13]. In addition to the season and cultivar, the climate of an area affects grapevine-growing operations [14,15]. The water deficit in the development phase of the berry causes a significant reduction in the weight of the berries, especially in periods of high temperature. However, during the maturation phase, this effect has not been found [16].
The effects of climate in southwest Spain must be explored, because Extremadura is the second autonomous community with the largest vineyard area (~83.763 ha) [17] in Spain and boasts, in addition to the Ribera del Guadiana protected designation of origin (PDO), two other protected geographical indications (PGIs) for wine, namely Cava de Denominación de Origen [designation-of-origin Cava] and Vino de la Tierra de Extremadura [Extremadura wine].
In Extremadura, approximately 80% of the total vineyard area is cultivated under arid conditions, without any water supply [18]; therefore, this region is highly vulnerable to increased temperature and decreased precipitation, as expected due to climate change. These changes may reduce grape and wine quality [19,20]. Climate change has been anticipated to reduce the suitability of warm and arid areas for grapevine cultivation [21]. Given the decrease in rainfall, particularly in the Mediterranean, irrigation is crucial to maintain wine production and quality [22]. This implies growing demand for water, which may be unsustainable due to the decreasing trend of precipitation in this area [23,24].
Aridity is a climate state, the average conditions of which in a region must be understood to identify the lack of moisture for the existing vegetation [25]. Aridity is the quotient between precipitation and temperature for a given period [26]. Aridity indices have been widely used to determine changes in climatic conditions and their effects on vegetation [25].
Numerous aridity indices have been used in the scientific literature, ranging from those based on evapotranspiration and precipitation, such as the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) aridity index (e.g., [27,28]), to others based on temperature and precipitation, such as the De Martonne index (IDM) and Pinna combinative index [29,30]. These indices are particularly valuable when applied to a specific crop. For grapevines, aridity indices have been used by Vyshkvarkova et al. [31] in Sevastopol, by Fraga et al. [13] in Portugal, by Tonietto and Carbonneau [32] globally, by Anderson et al. [33] in Australia, by Micah et al. [34] in Canada, and by Jones and Davis [10] in France. High or extreme aridity may be one of the key determinants of human activity [35]. Moreover, the spatiotemporal distribution of aridity has been studied in various European regions [24,29,36,37]. Ullah et al. [38] recommended using aridity in the indices at regional and local scales to obtain more robust results and formulate better planning, adaptation, and mitigation measures, thereby ensuring the sustainability of agriculture and water resources. It has been described that aridity in Extremadura is increasing in spring and summer [39]. This trend could influence the vine growing conditions in its different phases.
Due to the high interannual variability of the Mediterranean climate, aridity must be analysed according to crop stages in order to determine the most vulnerable stage and the possible impact on production and quality. The vine cycle is divided into different stages [40,41,42]. In Extremadura, the following stages have been described: vegetative growth, berry development, berry ripening, from the final stage to leaf fall, and from dormancy to new budding [43].
To this end, the main objective of the present study was to analyse the spatiotemporal patterns of aridity in Extremadura using IDM at the different grapevine growth stages, focusing on the area of PDO and its subareas, as well as the current grapevine-growing regions. Our findings will allow for assessing the impact of climate change in different grapevine-growing areas of Extremadura in terms of aridity for informing the design and adoption of agronomic measures and agricultural policies aimed at mitigating these effects.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The Extremadura region (37°57 to 40°29 N, 4°39 to 7°33 W) is located in southwest Spain, at the border with Portugal. This region is characterised by a rich diversity of ecosystems combined with topographic diversity across a territory spanning 41,633 km2, with an average elevation of 425 m above sea level (m.a.s.l), as shown by the digital elevation model (DEM) (Figure 1). Extremadura is considered one of the most important ecological enclaves in Europe and displays a marked contrast between large agricultural and forest areas [44,45].
The climate of Extremadura is typically Mediterranean, characterised by interannual variations that affect both temperature and precipitation. The Atlantic influence, southern location, and low altitude in much of its territory favour moderate winter temperatures [46]. Typically, the monthly mean minimum temperature ranges from 3.3 °C to 4 °C in January and the maximum from 33.6 °C to 34.8 °C in July [47]. However, Extremadura is a landlocked region and, as such, shows a strong thermal amplitude, predominantly with dry and hot summers and maximum temperatures exceeding 40 °C [26,48].
The average monthly precipitation surpassed 600 mm in December and January from 1989 to 2020, with the average annual precipitation ranging from 380 to 700 mm in 84% of Extremadura; however, in the north, the average annual precipitation ranges from 710 to 1000 mm in Las Hurdes and Sierra de Gata counties, and may reach up to 1500 mm in the mountainous areas of Sierra de Gredos and La Vera. Extremadura has a dry season from June to September and a rainy season from October to May (accounting for 80% rainfall). Periodic droughts lasting two or more years are common, occurring every 8–9 years [49]. In addition, this region shows remarkable variability of microclimatic conditions due to its topographical diversity. Two large rivers (Tagus and Guadiana) cross Extremadura from the east to the west, and their drainage basins are located in the areas with the lowest altitude in the region. In 1999, Extremadura vineyards were recognised for their uniqueness, receiving the ‘Ribera del Guadiana’ PDO from the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food (Ministerio de Agricultura Pesca y Alimentación, MAPA) [50]. In total, six subareas have been established under this PDO.

2.2. Database

From daily maximum (Tx) and minimum (Tn) temperature and precipitation (Rr) data corresponding to the 1989–2020 period, provided by the State Meteorological Agency (Agencia Estatal de Meteorología, AEMET), recorded at 108 weather stations located in Extremadura and its surroundings (Figure 1), a homogeneous database was built. This homogeneity enabled us to complete the missing data. Our database passed the quality controls established by the World Meteorological Organisation [51]. From the initial data, the aridity index was calculated and incorporated into the database.

2.3. De Martonne Aridity Index (IDM)

In the study carried out by Moral et al. [26], in which different indices were compared, in Extremadura, the IDM was the index that best discriminated between both annual and seasonal climatic types in the region. In addition, Paltineanu et al. [52] found a strong correlation between the IDM and the ETc over the entire growing season, and monthly values were also found for all crops studied, including the vine. Therefore, in the present study, IDM was used, because this index yields reliable results in characterising the arid/humid conditions of a territory [26,35,53]. The IDM was calculated using the following equation:
I D M = P a T a + 10  
where Pa is the mean annual precipitation (in mm), and Ta is the mean annual temperature (in °C).
According to the IDM values calculated using the equation above, the climate of a region can be classified, as outlined in Table 1.
Moreover, IDM can be calculated for a specific period. For a season, IDM was calculated as follows:
I S D M = 4 P S T S + 10  
where Ps and Ts are the precipitation volume and mean air temperature in the corresponding season, respectively.
For a specific month, IDM was calculated as follows:
I m D M = 12 P m T m + 10  
where Pm and Tm are the precipitation volume and mean air temperature in the corresponding month, respectively.
Furthermore, IDM was calculated according to the grapevine growth phases (Figure 2).

2.4. Interpolation

A geostatistical algorithm has been used to model spatial variations of the IDM. These spatial variations are described by a stochastic surface; that is, it is assumed that IDM has values everywhere in the study area and they are considered random, taking a series of values according to a probability distribution.
Predictions obtained using a regression-kriging algorithm used in the present study separated the estimation into two components, namely a component for the trend and another for the residuals, which were subsequently summed. In other words, any climate variable, Z RK * x —IDM in the present study—at a point without data was estimated using regression-kriging, as follows:
Z R K * x = m x + r x  
where m x   is the adjusted trend derived using linear regression analysis, and r(x) is the residual, estimated using the ordinary kriging algorithm. Therefore, the predictive model can be presented as follows:
Z R K * x = j = 0 p   c j v j x + i = 1 n w i x r x i ,   w i t h   v 0 x = 1
where c j is the coefficient of the estimated trend model, v j x   is the jth predictor in x , p is the number of predictors, and wi(x) is the weight, determined by solving the ordinary kriging system for the residual r(xi) at n sample points.
In the present study, elevation ( h ) and latitude ( l ) were used as predictors; therefore m(x) = a + b h(x) + cl(x) and, consequently,
Z R K * = a + b h x + c   l x + i = 1 n w i x r x i
At each point, the residual r(xi) was calculated as the difference between the land value and the estimate given by the trend; that is, r(xi) = Z(xi) − m(xi).
Height was extracted from the Extremadura elevation model in raster format at a 1000 × 1000 resolution (Figure 1). Based on point data at weather stations, this model provides estimates for any other non-sampled place to generate a continuous surface covering the entire region. In the present case, the value of IDM at any point in the Extremadura region was determined with a minimum resolution (pixel).
Finally, many digital models were generated for IDM when grapevine growth stages were considered (Figure 2), focusing on the areas with PDO. The entire process, including the graphical representation of IDM, was performed using ArcGIS v. 10.1. Geostatistical analysis was performed using the Geostatistical Analyst extension of ArcGIS.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. IDM in Extremadura According to Year and Growth Stage

The mean annual IDM corresponded to the Mediterranean climate. The period of grapevine vegetative growth, which spans from budding to leaf fall, has been globally classified as semi-arid. However, during the dormancy period, once the leaves have fallen, aridity decreases, and the weather becomes extremely humid (Table 2). This classification is typical of a climate with sharp interannual contrasts, in addition to high coefficients of variation reflecting a high interannual variability. These two aspects highlight the strong grapevine resilience to these climates.
During the growing season, climate conditions widely ranged from highly arid to extremely humid phases (Figure 3). This season was initially humid, favouring the vegetative growth of buds and the formation of flower clusters. Subsequently, the climate became more arid at the berry development and ripening stages, enabling adequate ripening for quality production. However, the lack of soil water reserves may compromise both the quantity and quality of harvest, because rainfall is very low during these stages. Climate during the final growth phase, from harvest to leaf fall, is classified as Mediterranean, with plants accumulating reserves under average conditions; mild temperatures and slight rainfall during autumn. Finally, at the dormancy stage, once the leaves have fallen, aridity bottoms, and the climate is classified as extremely humid, which is essential for the creation of soil water reserves for the start of the subsequent crop cycle without water restrictions. These conditions are propitious for the advance and shortening of the berry development and ripening phases, as suggested by Webb et al. [54], Arrizabalaga-Arriazu et al. [55], Ramos [56], and Ramos and de Toda [57]. These average conditions indicate that grapevines are highly adapted to the Mediterranean climate [42] and to arid areas [58].
Our analysis of data variability revealed a large difference between the maxima and minima, with a high standard deviation at all crop stages, also exhibiting high spatial and interannual climate variability in Extremadura, as previously described by Moral et al. [26,59]. As a result of this variability, in some years, the crop stages displayed aridity indices far from their optimal values, which is expected to considerably affect vine growth and development due to very humid ripening stages, or very arid initial and dormancy stages (Figure 3).

3.2. Spatial Distribution of IDM in Extremadura

Before producing the maps where the spatial distribution of IDM was displayed, the reliability of the kriged maps was assessed by means of cross-validation processes, estimating the variability of the predictions from the true values. Some prediction error statistics [60] were used as diagnostics (Table 3): the root mean square error was between 0.72 and 8.80, which is around 20% of the mean value for each phase; the mean standard error was between 0.76 and 8.97; the mean standardized error was lower than 0.07; and the root mean squared standardized error was between 0.90 and 1.07. Since all these statistics were very low and the root mean square errors were close to the mean standard errors, the kriged maps were appropriate. Moreover, the assessment of uncertainty was completed with some additional information: since the mean standard errors were close to the root mean squared prediction errors and the root mean squared standardized errors were close to one, the variability in predictions was correctly assessed in all cases.
Spatial analysis of IDM in Extremadura at the annual scale revealed five different aridity categories, albeit without extremely humid and arid categories (Figure 4). The predominant category was the Mediterranean (69.77% of the territory), followed by the semi-humid climate (23.33%). However, at the vegetative growth stage, the semi-arid category prevailed, covering almost 92% of the Extremadura territory and indicating limited water availability for plants during the growing season. In contrast, at the dormancy stage, the very humid category accounted for 96% of the Extremadura territory (Figure 4), when the plants no longer had a high water demand because the crop was dormant. These results indicate sharp climate contrasts.
During the initial growth stages, aridity widely varied in Extremadura across five categories, with the semi-humid climate prevailing in areas near the large drainage basins of Tajo and Guadiana (Figure 5), and accounting for 51.51% of the Extremadura territory.
In second place, humid areas (38.88%) were found at moderate altitudes (northeast and southeast Extremadura). The berry development and ripening stages showed an arid climate across virtually all of the Extremadura territory. The final stage was characterised as a transition to the dormancy stage and exhibited a pattern similar to the initial stage, with predominant semi-arid (65.8%) and Mediterranean climatic conditions.

3.3. IDM in the Ribera del Guadiana PDO

IDM analysis revealed that in 65.8% of the grapevine-growing areas in the Ribera del Guadiana PDO, the annual climate is classified as Mediterranean (Table 4). At the different growth stages, the spatial distribution of climates was similar to that in Extremadura, except at the final stage, when the percentage of semi-arid areas (53.3%) of the Ribera del Guadiana PDO was lower than that in the entire Extremadura region (66%). Consequently, the percentage of areas with a Mediterranean climate was higher. These climatic conditions are more suitable for the accumulation of plant reserves, which occurs during this stage. These reserves are essential for the initial stage of the next crop year. In addition, these conditions favour the hardening of grapevine shoots, which is essential for the crop to withstand the rigours of winter.

3.4. IDM in the Subareas of the Ribera del Guadiana PDO

At the annual scale, Cañamero and Matanegra showed the highest values of IDM (Figure 6), and most of their territory was classified as semi-humid (57% and 76%, respectively) (Table 5). In the other four areas, the Mediterranean climate prevailed (Table 5). Ribera Baja was the subarea with the largest percentage of the semi-arid category (over a third of its territory was classified in this category), which clearly limits the expansion of grapevine-growing areas. Most vines grown in this subarea are not located in the semi-arid area, as shown in Figure 5.
Overall, during the grapevine vegetative growth, the semi-arid climate prevailed, although Matanegra and Cañamero included large areas with a Mediterranean climate (55% and 48%, respectively), indicating favourable conditions for growing grapevines. Furthermore, at the dormancy stage, all subareas were classified as very humid, which implies average conditions favouring the accumulation of much-needed water reserves for the following vegetative growth cycle (Figure 6).
Aridity significantly varied at the initial growth stage of the crop (Figure 6). Subareas with the largest humid and very humid categories were, once again, Cañamero and Matanegra, followed by Montánchez, with a predominantly humid climate. Tierra de Barros and Ribera Alta showed similar distributions, with predominantly semi-humid and humid climates. Finally, Ribera Baja showed a predominantly semi-humid climate (Table 5). This variability across subareas shapes the type of viticulture and wine produced in these areas, because most of the grapevine leaf growth and development occurs at the initial stage, which is crucial for both wine production and quality.
Although no differences were noted between the berry development and ripening stages (Figure 6), the final growth stage (from harvest to leaf fall), once again, showed significant variability, as described for the entire region of Extremadura. The specific percentages for each subarea and their distribution are outlined in Table 5.
In summary, our analysis of subareas showed that, according to both year and growth stage, Matanegra and Cañamero have the largest surface areas with less arid and more suitable climate conditions for growing grapevines. In particular, lower aridity at the final growth stage during the accumulation of reserves may improve the composition, colour, and aroma of berries in these subareas [61]. Rivera Baja is the most arid subarea, whereas Montánchez, Rivera Alta, and Tierra de Barros are moderately arid. However, at the second and third growth stages, berry development and ripening, aridity conditions were comparable across all subareas due to high temperatures, which is evidently a hallmark of the PDO, denoting a highly peculiar viticulture, as described by Moral et al. [39]. The observed differences between the initial and final growth stages are expected to impact variety selection [62], cultivation techniques [58,63], and production quality [64].

3.5. IDM in a Vineyard Area in Ribera del Guadiana PDO

At the initial growth stage, most of the vineyard area of the Ribera del Guadiana PDO presented semi-humid and humid climate conditions (Table 6), enabling adequate vegetative growth of the shoots. At the berry development and ripening stages, however, the entire area was classified as arid. From the final growth stage to leaf fall, 81.4% of the territory exhibited semi-arid conditions, whilst the remaining 18.5% exhibited Mediterranean climatic conditions, which are more favourable at this stage. Finally, during dormancy, 99.7% of the region was classified as very humid (Table 6).
These findings indicate strong dependence of grapevine growth stages on winter and spring rainfall, as well as the particularly limiting conditions in terms of high temperatures and low rainfall at the other stages of the crop cycle. This implies that the quality of the grapes can be very different depending on the place of cultivation. These conditions may lead to advances in berry ripening [65] and an imbalance of sugar composition and acidity, whilst reducing the anthocyanin content [66]. Therefore, such variations in aridity during the grapevine growth cycle characterises the unique viticulture of this PDO.
Although these conditions are conducive to quality viticulture, decreased aridity (due to lower temperatures) at the ripening stage is more favourable [67,68,69]. Overall, our climate analysis across different grapevine-growing areas showed that the climatic conditions may be improved at the initial and final stages, particularly in the Tierra de Barros and Rivera Alta subareas, by expanding grapevine growing to higher areas with lower aridity at these stages, as recommended by van Leeuwen et al. [58].

4. Conclusions

In Extremadura, the average annual aridity conditions for grapevine growing are Mediterranean, characterised by a sharp contrast between the vegetative growth (semi-arid) and dormancy (very humid) stages. This contrast characterises viticulture in Extremadura.
According to growth stage, the region shows variable territorial distribution and good climatic (semi-humid to humid) conditions at the initial stage; however, from the intermediate stages to harvest, the climate is predominantly arid, with intermediate (Mediterranean–semi-arid) conditions from harvest to leaf fall.
The six subareas of the PDO region present marked differences in climate between the initial and final growth stages. Matanegra, Cañamero, and Montánchez are clearly more humid, whereas Ribera Baja is more arid than the other subareas.
Most of the current grapevine-growing areas endure arid conditions ranging from semi-humid (budding–flowering) to arid (flowering–harvest) and Mediterranean (harvest–leaf fall). These conditions are propitious for an advance and shortening of the berry development and ripening phases and are conducive to grapevine growth and harvest quality; however, a rise in temperatures due to climate change at the ripening stage may decrease wine yield and quality.
At present, certain PDO areas that are not cultivated exhibit more favourable climate conditions at the initial and final growth stages than the current grapevine-growing areas, which may be a viable expansion strategy for coping with climate change and ensuring sustainable crop production. In the most arid areas, cultivation techniques must be adapted, such as the choice of more resistant varieties and rootstocks, changes in the management systems and orientation of the rows, the use of antiperspirants, and the use of controlled deficit irrigation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization A.G.-M., C.A. and V.A.; methodology, A.G.-M., L.L.P. and F.J.M.; software, L.L.P.; validation, A.G.-M., F.J.M. and F.J.R.; formal analysis, F.J.M., L.L.P. and F.J.R.; investigation, A.G.-M., F.J.M., L.L.P. and F.J.R.; resources, A.G.-M. and C.A.; data curation, L.L.P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G.-M.; writing—review and editing, A.G.-M.; visualization, L.L.P. and F.J.R.; supervision, F.J.M.; project administration A.G.-M.; funding acquisition, A.G.-M. and F.J.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Junta de Extremadura and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the projects GR21022 (RMN028) “Investigación en Climatología Agroforestal” and IB18001 (“Análisis y modelización del impacto del cambio climático sobre la distribución de zonas vitícolas en Extremadura”).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agovino, M.; Casaccia, M.; Ciommi, M.; Ferrara, M.; Marchesano, K. Agriculture, Climate Change and Sustainability: The Case of EU-28. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 105, 525–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Calzadilla, A.; Rehdanz, K.; Betts, R.; Falloon, P.; Wiltshire, A.; Tol, R.S.J. Climate Change Impacts on Global Agriculture. Clim. Change 2013, 120, 357–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Krishna Kumar, K.; Rupa Kumar, K.; Ashrit, R.G.; Deshpande, N.R.; Hansen, J.W. Climate Impacts on Indian Agriculture. Int. J. Climatol. 2004, 24, 1375–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Khanal, R.C. Climate Change and Organic Agriculture. J. Agric. Environ. 2009, 10, 116–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Moreno, J.; Aguiló, E.; Alonso, S.; Álvarez Cobelas, M.; Anadón, R.; Ballester, F.; Benito, G.; Catalán, J.; de Castro, M.; Cendrero, A.; et al. Evaluación Preliminar de Los Impactos En España Por Efecto Del Cambio Climático; Centro de Publicaciones, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2005; ISBN 84-8320-303-0. [Google Scholar]
  6. Jackson, R.S. 6—Chemical Constituents of Grapes and Wine. In Wine Science (Third Edition); Jackson, R.S., Ed.; Food Science and Technology; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2008; pp. 270–331. ISBN 978-0-12-373646-8. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ramos, M.C.; Martínez-Casasnovas, J.A. Impacts of Annual Precipitation Extremes on Soil and Nutrient Losses in Vineyards of NE Spain. Hydrol. Process. Int. J. 2009, 23, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mullins, M.G.; Bouquet, A.; Williams, L.E. Biology of the Grapevine; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  9. Novikova, L.Y.; Naumova, L.G. Dependence of Fresh Grapes and Wine Taste Scores on the Origin of Varieties and Weather Conditions of the Harvest Year in the Northern Zone of Industrial Viticulture in Russia. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jones, G.V.; Davis, R.E. Climate Influences on Grapevine Phenology, Grape Composition, and Wine Production and Quality for Bordeaux, France. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2000, 51, 249–261. [Google Scholar]
  11. Camps, J.O.; Ramos, M.C. Grape Harvest and Yield Responses to Inter-Annual Changes in Temperature and Precipitation in an Area of North-East Spain with a Mediterranean Climate. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2012, 56, 853–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. de Cortázar-Atauri, I.G.; Daux, V.; Garnier, E.; Yiou, P.; Viovy, N.; Seguin, B.; Boursiquot, J.M.; Parker, A.K.; van Leeuwen, C.; Chuine, I. Climate Reconstructions from Grape Harvest Dates: Methodology and Uncertainties. Holocene 2010, 20, 599–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fraga, H.; Malheiro, A.C.; Moutinho-Pereira, J.; Cardoso, R.M.; Soares, P.M.M.; Cancela, J.J.; Pinto, J.G.; Santos, J.A. Integrated Analysis of Climate, Soil, Topography and Vegetative Growth in Iberian Viticultural Regions. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e108078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dubuordieu, D. Complementarity of Grape Varieties and Their Sensory Influence in the Style of Red and White Great Bordeaux Wine. In Proceedings of the Seventh Australian Wine Industry Technical Conference, Adelaida, Australia, 13–17 August 1989. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gladstones, J. Viticulture and Environment: A Study of the Effects of Environment on Grapegrowing and Wine Qualities, with Emphasis on Present and Future Areas for Growing Winegrapes in Australia; Winetitles: Adelaide, Australia, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mccarthy, M.G. The Effect of Transient Water Deficit on Berry Development of Cv. Shiraz (Vitis vinifera L.). Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 1997, 3, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. OEMV Observatorio Español del Mercado del Vino OEMV—Informes. Available online: https://www.oemv.es/informes (accessed on 28 October 2022).
  18. INE Cultivos Leñosos: Viñedo. Available online: https://www.ine.es/jaxi/Tabla.htm?path=/t01/p044/a2016/ccaa11/l0/&file=0412.px&L=0 (accessed on 21 July 2021).
  19. Escalona, J.M.; Flexas, J.; Medrano, H. Stomatal and Non-Stomatal Limitations of Photosynthesis under Water Stress in Field-Grown Grapevines. Funct. Plant Biol. 2000, 27, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Costa, J.M.; Ortuño, M.F.; Chaves, M.M. Deficit Irrigation as a Strategy to Save Water: Physiology and Potential Application to Horticulture. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2007, 49, 1421–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mosedale, J.R.; Abernethy, K.E.; Smart, R.E.; Wilson, R.J.; Maclean, I.M.D. Climate Change Impacts and Adaptive Strategies: Lessons from the Grapevine. Glob. Change Biol. 2016, 22, 3814–3828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Phogat, V.; Cox, J.W.; Šimůnek, J. Identifying the Future Water and Salinity Risks to Irrigated Viticulture in the Murray-Darling Basin, South Australia. Agric. Water Manag. 2018, 201, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Bladé, I.; Castro-Díez, Y.; Gutiérrez, J.M.; Herrera, S.; López-Moreno, J.I.; Serrano, S.M.V. Tendencias Atmosféricas en la Península Ibérica en Período Instrumental en el Contexto de la Variabilidad Natural; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación: Madrid, España, 2010; pp. 25–42. [Google Scholar]
  24. Paniagua, L.L.; García-Martín, A.; Moral, F.J.; Rebollo, F.J. Aridity in the Iberian Peninsula (1960–2017): Distribution, Tendencies, and Changes. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2019, 138, 811–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Agnew, C.; Anderson, E. Water Resources in the Arid Realm; Routledge: London, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  26. Moral, F.J.; Rebollo, F.J.; Paniagua, L.L.; García-Martín, A.; Honorio, F. Spatial Distribution and Comparison of Aridity Indices in Extremadura, Southwestern Spain. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2016, 126, 801–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Spinoni, J.; Micale, F.; Carrao, H.; Naumann, G.; Barbosa, P.; Vogt, J. Global and Continental Changes of Arid Areas Using the FAO Aridity Index over the Periods 1951–1980 and 1981–2010. In Proceedings of the Geophysical Research Abstracts, European Geosciences Union General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, 7–12 April 2013. EGU2013-9262-1. [Google Scholar]
  28. Spinoni, J.; Vogt, J.; Naumann, G.; Carrao, H.; Barbosa, P. Towards Identifying Areas at Climatological Risk of Desertification Using the Köppen–Geiger Classification and FAO Aridity Index. Int. J. Climatol. 2015, 35, 2210–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hrnjak, I.; Lukić, T.; Gavrilov, M.B.; Marković, S.B.; Unkašević, M.; Tošić, I. Aridity in Vojvodina, Serbia. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2014, 115, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Radaković, M.G.; Tošić, I.; Bačević, N.; Mladjan, D.; Gavrilov, M.B.; Marković, S.B. The Analysis of Aridity in Central Serbia from 1949 to 2015. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2018, 133, 887–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vyshkvarkova, E.; Rybalko, E.; Marchukova, O.; Baranova, N. Assessment of the Current and Projected Conditions of Water Availability in the Sevastopol Region for Grape Growing. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tonietto, J.; Carbonneau, A. A Multicriteria Climatic Classification System for Grape-Growing Regions Worldwide. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2004, 124, 81–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Anderson, K.; Findlay, C.; Fuentes, S.; Tyerman, S. Viticulture, Wine and Climate Change. Garnaut Clim. Change Rev. 2008, 560, 22. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hewer, M.J.; Gough, W.A. Climate Change Impact Assessment on Grape Growth and Wine Production in the Okanagan Valley (Canada). Clim. Risk Manag. 2021, 33, 100343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Şarlak, N.; Mahmood Agha, O.M.A. Spatial and Temporal Variations of Aridity Indices in Iraq. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2018, 133, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Costa, A.C.; Soares, A. Local Spatiotemporal Dynamics of a Simple Aridity Index in a Region Susceptible to Desertification. J. Arid Environ. 2012, 87, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Croitoru, A.-E.; Piticar, A.; Imbroane, A.M.; Burada, D.C. Spatiotemporal Distribution of Aridity Indices Based on Temperature and Precipitation in the Extra-Carpathian Regions of Romania. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2013, 112, 597–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ullah, S.; You, Q.; Sachindra, D.A.; Nowosad, M.; Ullah, W.; Bhatti, A.S.; Jin, Z.; Ali, A. Spatiotemporal Changes in Global Aridity in Terms of Multiple Aridity Indices: An Assessment Based on the CRU Data. Atmos Res. 2022, 268, 105998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Moral, F.J.; Rebollo, F.J.; Paniagua, L.L.; García, A.; de Salazar, E.M. Application of Climatic Indices to Analyse Viticultural Suitability in Extremadura, South-Western Spain. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2016, 123, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Martínez de Toda Fernández, F. Biología de la Vid: Fundamentos Biológicos de la Viticultura; Mundi-Prensa: Madrid, Spain, 1991; ISBN 8471143135. [Google Scholar]
  41. Reynier, A. Manual de Viticultura: Guía Técnica de Viticultura; Mundi-Prensa Libros: Madrid, Spain, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hidalgo Fernández-Cano, L. Tratado de Viticultura General, 3rd ed.; Mundi-Prensa Libros: Madrid, Spain, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  43. Uriarte, D.; Mancha Ramírez, L.; Román, O.; Prieto, M. Manual Práctico de Riego Vid Para Vinificación; Centro de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas de Extremadura (CICYTEX): Badajoz, Spain, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  44. Moral, F.J.; Rebollo, F.J.; Valiente, P.; López, F. Modeling of Atmospheric Pollution in Urban and Rural Sites Using a Probabilistic and Objective Approach. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Blanco Salas, J.; Labrador, J.; Monago, F.; Vallejo, J.R.; Morán-López, R.; Vázquez, F.M.; Ruiz Téllez, T. Resultados Del Proyecto “Valorización de La Biodiversidad Vegetal Del Espacio Protegido ZIR Sierra Grande de Hornachos Como Fuente de Innovación Para El Desarrollo”. Conserv. Veg. 2020, 24, 10. [Google Scholar]
  46. Roig, F.A.; Barriopedro, D.; García Herrera, R.; Patón Dominguez, D.; Monge, S. North atlantic oscillation signatures in western iberian tree-rings. Geogr. Ann. Ser. A Phys. Geogr. 2009, 91, 141–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. AEMET Agencia Estatal de Meteorología. Calendario Meteorológico 2022; Agencia Estatal de Meteorología (AEMET): Madrid, Spain, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  48. Labajo, Á.L.; Egido, M.; Martín, Q.; Labajo, J.; Luis Labajo, J. Definition and Temporal Evolution of the Heat and Cold Waves over the Spanish Central Plateau from 1961 to 2010. Atmósfera 2014, 27, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mata, C.A. El Clima y la Humedad del Suelo: Balances Hídricos Normales; Archivo Climatológico y Meteorológico Institucional: Madrid, Spain, 1984; Available online: https://repositorio.aemet.es/bitstream/20.500.11765/743/1/clima_cal85.pdf (accessed on 24 November 2022).
  50. Gobierno de España. Orden de 16 de Abril de 1999 Por La Que Se Ratifica El Reglamento de La Denominación de Origen «Ribera Del Guadiana» y de Su Consejo Regulador. In Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE-A-1999-9922); 1999; pp. 16247–16256. Available online: https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-1999-9922 (accessed on 24 November 2022).
  51. WMO World Meteorological Organization. Annual Report of the World Meteorological Organization 1966; WMO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  52. Paltineanu, C.; Tanasescu, N.; Chitu, E.; Mihailescu, I.F. Relationships between the De Martonne Aridity Index and Water Requirements of Some Representative Crops: A Case Study from Romania. Int. Agrophys. 2007, 21, 81–93. [Google Scholar]
  53. Baltas, E. Spatial Distribution of Climatic Indices in Northern Greece. Meteorol. Appl. 2007, 14, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Webb, L.B.; Whetton, P.H.; Bhend, J.; Darbyshire, R.; Briggs, P.R.; Barlow, E.W.R. Earlier Wine-Grape Ripening Driven by Climatic Warming and Drying and Management Practices. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2012, 2, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Arrizabalaga-Arriazu, M.; Morales, F.; Irigoyen, J.J.; Hilbert, G.; Pascual, I. Growth Performance and Carbon Partitioning of Grapevine Tempranillo Clones under Simulated Climate Change Scenarios: Elevated CO2 and Temperature. J. Plant Physiol. 2020, 252, 153226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ramos, M.C. Projection of Phenology Response to Climate Change in Rainfed Vineyards in North-East Spain. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2017, 247, 104–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ramos, M.C.; Martínez de Toda, F. Variability in the Potential Effects of Climate Change on Phenology and on Grape Composition of Tempranillo in Three Zones of the Rioja DOCa (Spain). Eur. J. Agron. 2020, 115, 126014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. van Leeuwen, C.; Destrac-Irvine, A.; Dubernet, M.; Duchêne, E.; Gowdy, M.; Marguerit, E.; Pieri, P.; Parker, A.; de Rességuier, L.; Ollat, N. An Update on the Impact of Climate Change in Viticulture and Potential Adaptations. Agronomy 2019, 9, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Moral, F.J. Comparison of Different Geostatistical Approaches to Map Climate Variables: Application to Precipitation. Int. J. Climatol. 2010, 30, 620–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Webster, R.; Oliver, M.A. Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  61. van Leeuwen, C.; Seguin, G. The Concept of Terroir in Viticulture. J. Wine Res. 2006, 17, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Destrac-Irvine, A.; van Leeuwen, K. VitAdapt, an Experimental Program to Study the Behavior of a Wide Range of Grape Varieties of Vitis Vinifera in a Context of Climate Change in the Bordeaux Vineyards. In Proceedings of the Climwine, Sustainable Grape and Wine Production in the Context of Climate Change, Bordeaux, France, 10–13 April 2016; pp. 165–171. [Google Scholar]
  63. Martínez-Moreno, A.; Sanz, F.; Yeves, A.; Gil-Muñoz, R.; Martínez, V.; Intrigliolo, D.S.; Buesa, I. Forcing Bud Growth by Double-Pruning as a Technique to Improve Grape Composition of Vitis Vinifera L. Cv. Tempranillo in a Semi-Arid Mediterranean Climate. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 256, 108614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. le Menn, N.; van Leeuwen, C.; Picard, M.; Riquier, L.; de Revel, G.; Marchand, S. Effect of Vine Water and Nitrogen Status, as well as Temperature, on Some Aroma Compounds of Aged Red Bordeaux Wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 7098–7109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Molitor, D.; Junk, J. Climate Change Is Implicating a Two-Fold Impact on Air Temperature Increase in the Ripening Period under the Conditions of the Luxembourgish Grapegrowing Region. Oeno One 2019, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sadras, V.O.; Moran, M.A. Elevated Temperature Decouples Anthocyanins and Sugars in Berries of Shiraz and Cabernet Franc. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2012, 18, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. van Leeuwen, C.; Destrac-Irvine, A. Modified Grape Composition under Climate Change Conditions Requires Adaptations in the Vineyard. Oeno One 2017, 51, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tonietto, J. Les Macroclimats Viticoles Mondiaux et L’influence Du Mésoclimat Sur La Typicité de La Syrah et Du Muscat de Hambourg Dans Le Sud de La France; Méthodologie de Caractérisation. Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Nationale Superieure Agronomique de Montpellier, Montpellier, France, 12 May 1999. [Google Scholar]
  69. Ramos, M.C. Soil Water Content and Yield Variability in Vineyards of Mediterranean Northeastern Spain Affected by Mechanization and Climate Variability. Hydrol. Process. Int. J. 2006, 20, 2271–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location map of Extremadura. Digital elevation model, vineyards, weather stations, and subzones of the Ribera del Guadiana Protected Denomination of Origin are shown.
Figure 1. Location map of Extremadura. Digital elevation model, vineyards, weather stations, and subzones of the Ribera del Guadiana Protected Denomination of Origin are shown.
Land 11 02125 g001
Figure 2. Analysed periods of the vine cycle.
Figure 2. Analysed periods of the vine cycle.
Land 11 02125 g002
Figure 3. Mean, maximum, minimum IDM, and standard deviation for the vine phases in Extremadura (1989–2020).
Figure 3. Mean, maximum, minimum IDM, and standard deviation for the vine phases in Extremadura (1989–2020).
Land 11 02125 g003
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of the De Martonne aridity index in Extremadura (1989–2020) for the anual, vegetative, and dormancy phases. Vineyards and subzones of the Ribera del Guadiana Protected Denomination of Origin are also shown.
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of the De Martonne aridity index in Extremadura (1989–2020) for the anual, vegetative, and dormancy phases. Vineyards and subzones of the Ribera del Guadiana Protected Denomination of Origin are also shown.
Land 11 02125 g004
Figure 5. Spatial distribution of the De Martonne aridity index in Extremadura (1989–2020) for the initial, growth, middle, and final phases. Vineyards and subzones of the Ribera del Guadiana Protected Denomination of Origin are also shown.
Figure 5. Spatial distribution of the De Martonne aridity index in Extremadura (1989–2020) for the initial, growth, middle, and final phases. Vineyards and subzones of the Ribera del Guadiana Protected Denomination of Origin are also shown.
Land 11 02125 g005
Figure 6. IDM for the subzones of the Ribera del Guadiana Protected Denomination of Origin, for the vine phases (1989–2020).
Figure 6. IDM for the subzones of the Ribera del Guadiana Protected Denomination of Origin, for the vine phases (1989–2020).
Land 11 02125 g006
Table 1. Type of climate according to the De Martonne aridity index (IDM, adapted after Baltas, 2007 [53]).
Table 1. Type of climate according to the De Martonne aridity index (IDM, adapted after Baltas, 2007 [53]).
ClassificationValues
AridIDM < 10
Semi-Arid10 ≤ IDM < 20
Mediterranean20 ≤ IDM < 24
Semi-humid24 ≤ IDM < 28
Humid28 ≤ IDM < 35
Very Humid35 ≤ IDM ≤ 55
Extremely humidIDM > 55
Table 2. Descriptive statistics of the De Martonne index in Extremadura for the annual, vegetative, and dormancy periods (1989–2020).
Table 2. Descriptive statistics of the De Martonne index in Extremadura for the annual, vegetative, and dormancy periods (1989–2020).
IDMMeanClassificationMaxMinCV%SD
IDM Annual23.8Mediterranean55.412.433.48
IDM Vegetative18.8Semi-Arid43.410.932.16.1
IDM Dormancy46.9Extremely humid11220.236.617.2
CV: Coefficient of variation; SD: Standard deviation.
Table 3. Statistic for validation of each IDM map.
Table 3. Statistic for validation of each IDM map.
Phases
Prediction ErrorsAnnualVegetativeInitialB.DevelopmentRipeningFinalDormancy
Root-Mean-Square6.314.737.351.850.735.588.80
Mean Standardized0.010.010.070.070.060.070.01
Root-Mean-Square-Standardized0.910.900.910.990.930.941.07
Average Standard Error7.055.328.061.760.775.938.98
Table 4. Spatial classification (%) of the Ribera del Guadiana Protected Denomination of Origin, according to the IDM for the vine phases (1989–2020).
Table 4. Spatial classification (%) of the Ribera del Guadiana Protected Denomination of Origin, according to the IDM for the vine phases (1989–2020).
PhasesAridSemi-AridMediterranSemi-HumidHumidVery Humid
Annual06.565.826.21.40
Vegetative Cycle095.34.50.200
Initial0014.655.130.30
Berry Develop.98.41.580000
Ripening10000000
Final053.344.66.40.10
Dormancy00000100
Table 5. Spatial classification of the subzones of the Ribera del Guadiana Protected Denomination of Origin (%) according to the IDM for the vine phases (1989–2020).
Table 5. Spatial classification of the subzones of the Ribera del Guadiana Protected Denomination of Origin (%) according to the IDM for the vine phases (1989–2020).
PhasesClassificationCañameroMatanegraMontánchezRibera AltaRibera BajaTierra de
Barros
AnnualSemi-arid000236.30
Mediterranean26.523.87085.663.760.5
Semi-humid57.376.227.612.4039.4
Humid16.202.4000
VegetativeSemi-arid38.552799510075.3
Mediterranean55.348215024.7
Semi-humid6.200000
InitialMediterranean0007.110.10.1
Semi-humid11.34.144.666.68943.7
Humid69.495.951.926.20.956.2
Very humid19.303.60.100
FinalSemi-arid18.61156.281.499.752.6
Mediterranean69.58942.918.60.347.4
Semi-humid11.801000
Humid0.100000
Table 6. Spatial classification in vineyard areas of the Ribera del Guadiana Protected Denomination of Origin (%) according to the IDM for the vine phases (1989–2020).
Table 6. Spatial classification in vineyard areas of the Ribera del Guadiana Protected Denomination of Origin (%) according to the IDM for the vine phases (1989–2020).
Vineyard Area (%)Initial PhaseBerry Development and Ripening PhasesFinal PhaseDormancy Phase
Arid0.010000
Semi-arid0.0081.40
Mediterranean4.9018.50
Semi-humid67.500.10
Humid26.9000
Very humid0.60099.7
Extremely humid0000.3
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

García-Martín, A.; Aguirado, C.; Paniagua, L.L.; Alberdi, V.; Moral, F.J.; Rebollo, F.J. Spatial Analysis of Aridity during Grapevine Growth Stages in Extremadura (Southwest Spain). Land 2022, 11, 2125. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122125

AMA Style

García-Martín A, Aguirado C, Paniagua LL, Alberdi V, Moral FJ, Rebollo FJ. Spatial Analysis of Aridity during Grapevine Growth Stages in Extremadura (Southwest Spain). Land. 2022; 11(12):2125. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122125

Chicago/Turabian Style

García-Martín, Abelardo, Cristina Aguirado, Luis L. Paniagua, Virginia Alberdi, Francisco J. Moral, and Francisco J. Rebollo. 2022. "Spatial Analysis of Aridity during Grapevine Growth Stages in Extremadura (Southwest Spain)" Land 11, no. 12: 2125. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122125

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop