1. Introduction
One of the main goals of the Millennium Development Report is to ensure environmental sustainability [
1], which is responsible maintenance of natural resources and the avoidance of jeopardizing the ability of future generations to meet their needs [
2]. Environmental sustainability is a core prerequisite for lasting socio-economic development. Mitigating future environmental problems and improving livelihoods everywhere depend on healthy and diverse ecosystems and natural resources [
1]. One crucial area playing the main role in maintaining natural resources and achieving environmental sustainability is protected areas (PAs), which have high sensitivity because of their recognized natural, ecological, or cultural values [
3,
4], and they must be widely preserved. The core issue in PAs is habitat integrity, which helps maintain natural resources and biodiversity, especially when habitat is complementary [
5,
6,
7]. Habitat integrity is associated with how pristine an environment is and its function relative to an ecosystem’s potential or original state before imposed human exploitations and alterations [
8,
9]. It is built on the assumption that a decline in the values of an ecosystem’s functions is primarily caused by human activity [
9].
Unprincipled land use/land cover (LULC) change is one of the most critical problems in most PAs of Iran because it disrupts environmental planning and increases landscape fragmentation. Iran ranks 5th globally in terms of its high diversity in plant and animal species [
10]; thus, it is essential to maintain habitat integrity in its PAs. Tehran Province (as the capital of Iran), with 11 PAs [
11], is one of the wealthiest provinces of Iran and can be a good platform for the development of plant and animal species. Unfortunately, in recent decades and for various reasons, PAs in this province has undergone several changes. Therefore, habitat integrity in these areas has been seriously threatened. Many factors have contributed to the growing habitat fragmentation in these areas, such as LULC changes, the illegal activities of multiple organizations in the various development projects, road construction, the development of various infrastructures, the establishment of industrial spaces, and overexploitation of mines, even while these areas are protected by the Department of Environment of Iran and must have the highest protection conditions. Other problems, such as livestock overgrazing by the nomads and the widespread development of tourism activities, have been insufficiently monitored by the Provincial Department of Environment, thus resulting in the destruction of pastures, depletion of water resources and vegetation, and severe damage to ecosystems in these areas. The existence of numerous tourist attractions (like Mount Damavand, Lar dam, Kamard waterfall, the unique forests of wild pistachio (
Pistacia atlantica Desf.), Latian Dam, Jajrud River, the beautiful landscapes of TangehVashi Natural Monument, and diverse medicinal plant species) that have national and regional importance has encouraged tourism and the development of tourism activities. In addition to the low level of monitoring in the area has affected the destruction of natural resources in these areas. Undoubtedly, the continuation of this process will decrease landscape integrity and increase environmental unsustainability. Moreover, due to the rapid physical growth of the Tehran metropolis in recent decades, some PAs are now located in the city’s interior. This issue has led to increased LULC changes. Therefore, controlling LULC changes and developing conservation approaches to decrease habitat fragmentations are essential to achieving environmental sustainability in PAs.
The landscape ecology approach is one of the main methods of identifying the integrity level of ecosystems. This approach examines the relationship between patterns and functions on spatial and temporal scales and the impacts of ecological processes and natural habitats [
12]. Accordingly, landscape ecologists have developed metrics to quantify ecological patterns and the effects of human activities on ecosystem processes, each of which can elucidate a visible change in the landscape [
5]. Several researchers have evidenced the usefulness of these metrics for evaluating the state of habitat integrity in PAs, including Paolaet et al. [
13], who studied “using landscape structure to develop quantitative baselines for PAs monitoring”. They also used landscape metrics, including COHESION (cohesion index), MESH (effective mesh size), PD (patch density), CWED (contrast-weighted edge density), TECI (total edge contrast index), CONTAG (contagion), and SHDI (Shannon’s diversity index), and focused on the spatial characteristics of LULC classes in the landscape. The results revealed that PD, CWED, and TECI had been increased at the level of LULC classes, while COHESION, MESH, CONTAG, and SHDI have been decreased, which elucidates the decrease in integrity patches. Scariot et al. [
14] studied connectivity dynamics of Araucaria forest and grassland surrounding a national forest in Southern Brazil. Because changes in the structure of natural habitats surrounding PAs interfere with biodiversity conservation measures, this research analyzed the fragmentation and loss of vegetation in three landscape levels surrounding Passo Fundo National Forest, RS, Brazil, in 1986, 1997, and 2011, and identified the degree of isolation/connectivity of these patches. Another study was the work of Castillo et al. [
15] on the “evaluation of forest cover change using remote sensing techniques and landscape metrics in Moncayo Natural Park (Spain)”. This research analyzed LULC changes to assess the state of habitat integrity in PAs through quantitative landscape metrics over LULC maps. The metrics used in this study included PD, NP (number of patches), COHESION, LPI (largest patch index), PLAND (percentage of landscape), AREA-MN (mean of patch area), ENN-MN (mean of Euclidean nearest neighbor distance), and CA (class area) and focused on the class level. These metrics were selected based on past research on forest evolution, natural parks, or urban expansion [
16,
17,
18,
19,
20]. De Matos et al. [
21] studied “PAs and forest fragmentation: sustainability index for prioritizing fragments for landscape restoration” and developed a forest sustainability index based on the landscape ecology approach. Accordingly, a LULC map was used to calculate landscape metrics at two levels: landscape and patch. Hence, the metrics combination which best represented their goal included CA, NP, MPS (mean path size), MSI (mean shape index), TCAI (total core area index), and ENNM (mean distance from the nearest neighboring patch). Landscape structure analysis showed that MSI, MPS, and NP metrics decreased at the forest level, explaining the decrease in the number of patches, total edge, and mean patch size. On the other hand, CA, TCAI, and ENNM metrics were increased at the forest level, explaining the increase in integrity patches. Moreover, Adriana-Chetan and Dornik [
22] studied 20 years of landscape dynamics within the world’s largest international network of PAs. Accordingly, the suitable metrics applied to analyze the change in fragmentation were NP, MPS, DI (division index), and DOM (dominance index). The results indicated that NP and DOM were increased, while MPS and DI were decreased.
According to different studies, landscape metrics are generally classified into landscape composition and configuration. Landscape composition metrics evaluate the landscape regardless of spatial features, while landscape configuration examines the spatial arrangement of landscape elements, and their calculation requires spatial information [
23]. Metrics such as SHDI or PLAND are commonly used to study landscape composition, while landscape configuration metrics involve MNN (mean nearest neighbor distance), PLAD (percentage of like adjacency), MSI, or MPI [
24]. These metrics are essential in the study of habitat fragmentation, where patch isolation causes the extinction of species populations by decreasing dispersion in patches [
25,
26]. In some cases, habitat fragmentation reduces the continuity of the population in the face of natural hazards (e.g., fires and storms) [
27]. In addition, the MSI and MPS metrics were used to examine various environmental features, animal search strategies and flows between patches [
28]. The MSI metric is directly related to the overall heterogeneity of the landscape, while the CA metric provides space to support appropriate populations in terms of ecological relevance [
29]. In general, not enough attention is given to classifying and selecting related landscape composition and configuration metrics in different studies. Accordingly, the current research has considered this issue, and landscape configuration metrics have been used. The purpose of these metrics is to quantify ecological patterns and the impacts of human activities on habitats. Hence, the most common metrics used in this study are CA, CAP (class area percentage), NP, TE (total edge), MSI, MNN, and MPS. The research’s main questions were: (1) What extent were the LULC changes in the studied areas during recent decades? (2) What is the level of habitat fragmentation in the studied areas? (3) What are the major impacts of habitat fragmentation on the ecosystem’s structure and functions in the studied areas? Finally, (4) what is the situation of habitat integrity in the studied sites? Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the state of habitat integrity in PAs through quantitative landscape metrics and compared the results of LULC changes and fragmentation in three different PAs, including a national park, protected area, and national natural monument. Then, as no other studies have done, the impacts of habitat fragmentation on the structure and function of the ecosystem were analyzed. In addition, habitat integrity was assessed in various study sites.
4. Discussion
Insufficient knowledge to assess habitat integrity in PAs is a significant challenge. The results of some studies have revealed that habitat integrity leads to high protection of biodiversity and achieves environmental sustainability [
14,
71]. Accordingly, habitat integrity was investigated using landscape ecology metrics in Lar National Park, Jajrud PA, and TangehVashi Natural Monument. Based on the conservation approaches in PAs of Iran, national parks and natural monuments have high sensitivity and low flexibility for the development of human activities [
72]; therefore, the exploitation of these areas is prohibited, while in PAs, the development of some restricted economic activities is possible according to the rules and regulations. Hence, to recognize the state of habitat integrity in PAs, this study identified and monitored LULC changes from 1989 to 2019.
Among the LULC in Lar National Park, low-density pasture had the top increasing trend with 69% in 2019 compared to 65% in 1989 (
Figure 7). One of the main reasons for this increased volume in a low-density pasture is livestock overgrazing by nomads (the number of livestock is more than the capacity and potential of pastures), which has decreased high-density pasture volume and increased low-density pasture in this area. In previous studies, overgrazing was reported as the most important reason for pasture degradation [
73,
74]. Another reason is the uncontrolled movement of visitors for hunting, walking, mountaineering, rock climbing, and off-road vehicle driving in this area. There are various famous tourist attractions in this area (such as Mount Damavand, Lar Dam, etc.); therefore, most of the time, many tourists visit the area and cause ecosystem degradation, landscape fragmentation, and environmental unsustainability. For example, off-road vehicle driving is considered as the main contributor to land degradation in semiarid and arid pastures [
75]. Insufficient monitoring is one main reason for the uncontrolled entry of nomads and tourists into the area, and they have many negative impacts on habitat integrity. These findings have also been confirmed in literature reviews [
32,
33,
59]. Moreover, Jahani and Saffariha [
76] assessed the impacts of livestock and tourism activities on vegetation in Lar National Park. Their results indicated that vegetation diversity has decreased due to overgrazing and the development of tourism activities. Accordingly, the results of many studies have suggested that the diversity and density of vegetation have declined because of the development of human activities [
55,
56,
77,
78,
79,
80,
81].
According to the results, Jajrud PA, one of the oldest PAs in Tehran Province, had the top increase in built-up trend with 12% in 2019 compared to 10% in 1989. Accordingly, in the Jajrud PA, habitat integrity has been extensively destroyed due to multiple factors, particularly the interference of different institutions with the management of the PA through the development of physical and economic activities. Through overwhelming influence, different parts of this PA have been assigned to various organizations for financial exploitation, and they could quickly destroy the ecosystem and habitats of the area. The diversity of decision-making institutions has diminished the role of the Department of the Environment of Iran as custodian of the management and decision-making process related to the protection of these areas. Several issues must be analyzed to determine whether the Department of the Environment of Iran are accomplishing their goal to preserve natural resources and biodiversity in PAs, like the conservation budget and logistical shortcomings [
82,
83,
84]. Moreover, another important issue increasing the LULC changes in this area is the growth of human activities, particularly dams, roads, residential complexes, factories, industrial and mining activities, canalization, and gas pipes. The inability of the Department of the Environment of Tehran to monitor and manage the area, along with the influence of some governmental stakeholders, has led to extensive human activities in the area. Furthermore, the deterioration of the PAs was not accounted for due to a lack of monitoring [
85]. In addition, the lack of cooperation among different organizations and the Department of the Environment of Tehran in protecting this area has caused extensive destruction and unsustainability in the PAs. As seen in
Table 4, during 1989–2019, built-up had the top increasing trend in this area, which led to a decrease in the volume of vegetation, especially high-density pasture. Other studies have confirmed these findings [
33,
34,
62,
86,
87], which have demonstrated that habitat fragmentation and unsustainability of societies have increased because of human activities such as the development of transportation infrastructures and growth in population and cities.
According to the protection laws and regulations of the Department of the Environment of Iran, TangehVashi Natural Monument has high legal restrictions against all physical and economic activities; however, low-level monitoring and high tourist volume have led to the destruction of vegetation in this area, thus decreasing habitat integrity. Many tourism activities are available in the TangehVashi area, such as mountaineering and rock climbing (especially on weekends and holidays). These activities have caused the destruction of high-density pastures and increased habitat fragmentation. As the results revealed, bare land had the top increasing trend with 81.4% in 2019 compared to 80.8% in 1989. One of the foremost issues affecting the direction of LULC changes in TangehVashi is many tourists to this area. As per statistics from Tehran Province’s Department of the Environment, more than 600,000 tourists visit this area annually [
11]. Various factors, such as livestock overgrazing, the widespread development of tourism activities, and natural disasters (e.g., soil erosion and abrupt floods), have reduced vegetation density, especially in the high-density pasture. Other important reasons for LULC changes in the TangehVashi area include the lack of monitoring and control stations, insufficient number of guard stations and environmental guardians, a lack of the necessary protective equipment, and intelligent cameras to monitor the density of tourists. Our literature reviews would support these interpretations [
35,
88,
89,
90]. Tourist numbers, vegetation types, and seasonality (both visitor use and plant growth) can affect how soil and vegetation react to tourists’ trampling [
91,
92]. Additionally, interviews with 93 PA managers globally discovered that the number of guards within the PA was significantly related to PAs’ ability to deter habitat change [
93]. Literature reviews suggest that the growing demand for tourism in the PAs may also play a role in driving population increase as a driving force for LULC change [
94]. The decreasing trend in changes to the high-density pastures class is related to Lar National Park from 1989 to 2019. The main reasons for these changes are livestock overgrazing, proximity to the metropolis of Tehran, having pristine natural attractions, and the effect of a suitable climate for developing tourism activities.
According to landscape ecology principles, habitat fragmentation leads to an increased number of patches and finally changes in the structure and function of the ecosystem [
64]. Landscape metrics can be used to measure the impacts of LULC changes on habitats at different spatial and temporal scales. For example, researchers explain that scale and zoning effects associated with changes in the size, shape, and connectivity of natural and semi-natural LULC affect critical ecological processes such as species migration or influence landscape management [
95]. Moreover, different studies have demonstrated that metrics used to examine human activities and LULC types perform well in documenting structural changes through time and investigating the dynamics of LULC changes [
96,
97]. The results indicated that CA, CAP, and MPS metrics decreased at the level of high-density pastures during the studied years, which explains the increase in the size of fragmentation patches. However, NP, MSI, MNN, and TE increased, which illustrates an increase in the number of patches and a decrease in habitat integrity. Moreover, the most decreasing trend was related to CA among the metrics, while the lowest decreasing trend during the studied years was associated with TE. The findings further demonstrate that the class of high-density pasture had the highest fragmentation during the studied years due to the trend in LULC changes. Hence, increasing the number and distance between patches has caused habitat fragmentation to grow in these areas. One of the main reasons for this issue is the uncontrolled development of human activities, which has decreased habitat integrity; the continuation of this trend will lead to increased unsustainability in these areas.
According to the experts, many authors have highly acknowledged the importance of knowledge-sharing as an integral part of decision-making. The synergy of experts’ knowledge, which can be realized through a collaborative knowledge-sharing process, can be further pursued by devising a workable policy framework [
98]. Accordingly, in this study, and based on the experts’ viewpoints, the main impacts of habitat fragmentation in different types of PAs were evaluated, which may help prevent the negative consequences of LULC changes in these areas. A comparison of the studied areas (
Table 6) indicated that in Lar National Park, the most significant impacts are related to decreased habitat integrity and increased sink habitat patches. “Source-sink” landscape theory separates all landscape types into source and sink types; it aims to explain ecological processes by looking at landscape patterns and determining suitable landscaping patterns [
99]. “Source-sink” landscape theory offers effective practical framework for integrating landscape patterns and ecological processes, and it has been applied successfully to environmental issues [
100]. Sources are habitats of high quality that permit population growth. Sinks consist of low-quality habitats that, on their own, cannot sustain a population and have a negative population growth rate [
101]. Decreasing habitat integrity leads to dysconnectivity between species and, ultimately, their extinction [
102]. Accordingly, conservation biologists believe that connectivity and habitat integrity increase the species’ survival, while the impacts of fragmentation lead to increased habitat isolation [
103,
104]. The source-sink landscape theory states that incremental habitat loss caused by fragmentation can have a negative impact on population growth, resulting in abrupt thresholds in population viability [
99,
100]. This study further clarified that, in Jajrud PA, the most increasing fragmentation is in the landscape and animal habitats due to the development of built-up and LULC changes in this area. These findings have also been confirmed in the study of Sadegh-Oghli et al. [
62]. Therefore, according to the experts’ viewpoints, the greatest possible impacts of habitat fragmentation relate to changes in the patterns and structure of spatial elements (size, shape, number, type, composition, and status of habitat). Finally, the study of the impacts of fragmentation in the TangehVashi Natural Monument elucidated that the increase in habitat patches in this area (due to the development of many tourism activities) has led to a decrease in the stability of the area and increased edge effect. Hence, the possible impacts of habitat fragmentation relate to decreased stability and the increased edge effect of patches. Therefore, studying habitat fragmentation in this area is necessary to achieve proper planning and management. These findings have also been confirmed in the study of Paziresh et al. [
88].
In the present study, the issue of habitat integrity and connectivity in PAs as a fundamental basis for the evaluation and development of conservation strategies has been primarily addressed in terms of protection and development in these areas. Protected area managers do not strictly enforce many of the regulations and laws on PAs. This is particularly true when protecting objectives conflict with socio-economic demands [
83]. According to the methodology of this study, the capability of quantifying ecological patterns and impacts of human activities on natural ecosystems, especially PAs, and quantifying the landscape patterns can help managers protect these areas and achieve environmental sustainability. Therefore, controlling LULC changes and developing conservation approaches are essential steps to decreasing habitat fragmentation in PAs. Despite the mentioned strengths, one weakness of this study is the relatively short description of study areas and their main ecological features. In other words, less attention was given to habitat structural differences, pattern changes, and signs related to ecological processes in the study areas. Hence, the results of this study emphasize the use of the landscape ecology approach for evaluating the management of PAs and identifying protection patches to prioritize and protect these areas as much as possible.
A key limitation of the Delphi method is that there are no comprehensive and universal guidelines, a lack of adequate policies, a lack of consensus for a conclusion, and no explicit definition of the expert for the Delphi group [
105,
106]. Our research had many limitations to using the Delphi method, including different definitions and principles for defining/performing Delphi steps, respondents failing to complete questionnaires with seriousness, and concerns about written comments.