Integrating Landscape Pattern into Characterising and Optimising Ecosystem Services for Regional Sustainable Development
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Methodology
2.2.1. Questionnaire for Retrieving the ES Matrix
2.2.2. Global Spatial Modelling of ESVs
2.2.3. Local Spatial Adjustment of ESVs
3. Results
3.1. Matrix of Land Use and Ecosystem Service
3.2. The Driving Factors for ESV Change
3.3. Spatial Adjustment of ESVs
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Metzger, J.P.; Villarreal-Rosas, J.; Suárez-Castro, A.F.; López-Cubillos, S.; González-Chaves, A.; Runting, R.K.; Hohlenwerger, C.; Rhodes, J.R. Considering landscape-level processes in ecosystem service assessments. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 796, 149028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yohannes, H.; Soromessa, T.; Argaw, M.; Warkineh, B. Spatio-temporal changes in ecosystem service bundles and hotspots in Beressa watershed of the Ethiopian highlands: Implications for landscape management. Environ. Chall. 2021, 5, 100324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costanza, R.; d’Arge, R.; De Groot, R.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; O’Neill, R.V.; Paruelo, J.; et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Groot, R.S.; Wilson, M.A.; Boumans, R.M. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41, 393–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Costanza, R.; De Groot, R.; Sutton, P.; Van der Ploeg, S.; Anderson, S.J.; Kubiszewski, I.; Farber, S.; Turner, R.K. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Change 2014, 26, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, J.; Li, Y.; Cui, S.; Xu, L.; Ding, S.; Nie, W. Linking land-use change, landscape patterns, and ecosystem services in a coastal watershed of southeastern China. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 23, e01177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Degefu, M.A.; Argaw, M.; Feyisa, G.L.; Degefa, S. Dynamics of urban landscape nexus spatial dependence of ecosystem services in rapid agglomerate cities of Ethiopia. Sci. Total Env. 2021, 798, 149192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Egoh, B.; Rouget, M.; Reyers, B.; Knight, A.T.; Cowling, R.M.; van Jaarsveld, A.S.; Welz, A. Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: A review. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63, 714–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ehrlich, P.; Ehrlich, A. Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species; Random House: New York, NY, USA, 1981; p. 305. [Google Scholar]
- Schröter, M.; Van der Zanden, E.H.; van Oudenhoven, A.P.; Remme, R.P.; Serna-Chavez, H.M.; De Groot, R.S.; Opdam, P. Ecosystem services as a contested concept: A synthesis of critique and counter-arguments. Conserv. Lett. 2014, 7, 514–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brück, M.; Abson, D.; Fischer, J.; Schultner, J. Broadening the scope of ecosystem services research: Disaggregation as a powerful concept for sustainable natural resource management. Ecosyst. Serv. 2022, 53, 101399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jericó-Daminello, C.; Schröter, B.; Garcia, M.M.; Albert, C. Exploring perceptions of stakeholder roles in ecosystem services coproduction. Ecosyst. Serv. 2021, 51, 101353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torres, A.V.; Tiwari, C.; Atkinson, S.F. Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners. Ecosyst. Serv. 2021, 49, 101267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aryal, K.; Maraseni, T.; Apan, A. How much do we know about trade-offs in ecosystem services? A systematic review of empirical research observations. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 806, 151229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Song, W.; Deng, X. Land-use/land-cover change and ecosystem service provision in China. Total Environ. 2017, 576, 705–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fang, L.; Wang, L.; Chen, W.; Sun, J.; Cao, Q.; Wang, S.; Wang, L. Identifying the impacts of natural and human factors on ecosystem service in the Yangtze and Yellow River Basins. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 314, 127995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abera, W.; Tamene, L.; Kassawmar, T.; Mulatu, K.; Kassa, H.; Verchot, L.; Quintero, M. Impacts of land use and land cover dynamics on ecosystem services in the Yayo coffee forest biosphere reserve, southwestern Ethiopia. Ecosyst. Serv. 2021, 50, 101338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ketema, H.; Wei, W.; Legesse, A.; Wolde, Z.; Endalamaw, T. Quantifying ecosystem service supply-demand relationship and its link with smallholder farmers’ well-being in contrasting agro-ecological zones of the East African Rift. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2021, 31, e01829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruno, D.; Sorando, R.; Álvarez-Farizo, B.; Castellano, C.; Céspedes, V.; Gallardo, B.; Jiménez, J.J.; López, M.V.; López-Flores, R.; Moret-Fernández, D.; et al. Depopulation impacts on ecosystem services in Mediterranean rural areas. Ecosyst. Serv. 2021, 52, 101369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, H.; Kong, W.; Zhou, G.; Sun, O.J. Impacts of landscape patterns on water-related ecosystem services under natural restoration in Liaohe River Reserve, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 792, 148290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, M.; Jiang, C.; Huang, W.; Chen, W.; Gong, Q.; Yang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhuang, C.; Wang, J.; Yang, Z. Quantifying the supply-demand balance of ecosystem services and identifying its spatial determinants: A case study of ecosystem restoration hotspot in Southwest China. Ecol. Eng. 2022, 174, 106472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palacios-Agundez, I.; Onaindia, M.; Barraqueta, P.; Madariaga, I. Provisioning ecosystem services supply and demand: The role of landscape management to reinforce supply and promote synergies with other ecosystem services. Land Use Policy 2015, 47, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jahanishakib, F.; Salmanmahiny, A.; Mirkarimi, S.H.; Poodat, F. Hydrological connectivity assessment of landscape ecological network to mitigate development impacts. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 296, 113169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, Z.; Peng, J.; Dong, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Q.; Lyu, D.; Qiao, R.; Zhang, Z. Spatial correlation between the changes of ecosystem service supply and demand: An ecological zoning approach. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2002, 217, 104258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botzas-Coluni, J.; Crockett, E.T.; Rieb, J.T.; Bennett, E.M. Farmland heterogeneity is associated with gains in some ecosystem services but also potential trade-offs. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2021, 322, 107661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.; Yu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wu, P.; Axmacher, J.C. Taxon-and functional group-specific responses of ground beetles and spiders to landscape complexity and management intensity in apple orchards of the North China Plain. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2022, 323, 107700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Yang, P.; Tao, Y.; Bian, H. Improving ecosystem services supply provides insights for sustainable landscape planning: A case study in Beijing, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 802, 149849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, S.M.; Montalto, F.A. Stakeholder perceptions of the ecosystem services provided by Green Infrastructure in New York City. Ecosyst. Serv. 2019, 37, 100928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okada, T.; Mito, Y.; Tokunaga, K.; Sugino, H.; Kubo, T.; Akiyama, Y.B.; Endo, T.; Otani, S.; Yamochi, S.; Kozuki, Y. A comparative method for evaluating ecosystem services from the viewpoint of public works. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2021, 212, 105848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Csurgó, B.; Smith, M.K. The value of cultural ecosystem services in a rural landscape context. J. Rural. Stud. 2021, 86, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, W.; Wu, T.; Fu, B. The value of ecosystem services in China: A systematic review for twenty years. Ecosyst. Serv. 2021, 52, 101365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, G.; Lu, C.; Leng, Y.; Zheng, D.; Li, S. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. J. Nat. Resour. 2003, 18, 189–196. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, G.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, C.; Zheng, D.; Cheng, S. Study on valuation of rangeland ecosystem services of China. J. Nat. Resour. 2001, 16, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
- Mo, H.W.; Ren, Z.Y.; Wang, Q.X. Images analysis of land use change and its eco-environmental effects in wind drift sand region-a case study on Yuyang district of the northern Shaanxi Province. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 2008, 28, 770–775. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, X.; Chen, Y.; Ma, J.; Hao, X. Research of the sustainable development of Tarim River based on ecosystem service function. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2011, 10, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wan, L.; Ye, X.; Lee, J.; Lu, X.; Zheng, L.; Wu, K. Effects of urbanization on ecosystem service values in a mineral resource-based city. Habitat Int. 2015, 46, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, D.; Yan, C.; Xiu, L.; Feng, K. The impact of mining changes on surrounding lands and ecosystem service value in the Southern Slope of Qilian Mountains. Ecol. Complex. 2018, 36, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, J.; Wu, J.; Gong, Y. Valuing wetland ecosystem services based on benefit transfer: A meta-analysis of China wetland studies. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 122988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, X.; Yu, J.; Zhao, X.; Wang, J. Spatiotemporal evolution of ecosystem service values in an area dominated by vegetation restoration: Quantification and mechanisms. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 131, 108191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, G.; Zheng, D.; Xie, L.; Zhang, X.; Wu, H.; Li, S. Mapping changes in the value of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Middle Reaches Megalopolis, China. Ecosyst. Serv. 2021, 48, 101252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bi, J.; Hao, R.; Li, J.; Qiao, J. Identifying ecosystem states with patterns of ecosystem service bundles. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 131, 108195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, P.; Hu, Y.; Jia, W. Land use optimization research based on FLUS model and ecosystem services–setting Jinan City as an example. Urban Clim. 2021, 40, 100984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halkos, G.; Gkampoura, E.C. Where do we stand on the 17 Sustainable Development Goals? An overview on progress. Econ. Anal. Policy 2021, 70, 94–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, C.; Zhao, W.; Cherubini, F.; Pereira, P. Integrate ecosystem services into socio-economic development to enhance achievement of sustainable development goals in the post-pandemic era. Geogr. Sustain. 2021, 2, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bieng, N.; Finegan, B.; Sist, P. Active restoration of secondary and degraded forests in the context of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. For. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 503, 119770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hardaker, A.; Pagella, T.; Rayment, M. Integrated assessment, valuation and mapping of ecosystem services and dis-services from upland land use in Wales. Ecosyst. Serv. 2020, 43, 101098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, L.; Hu, M.; Wang, Y. Integrating ecosystem services value and uncertainty into regional ecological risk assessment: A case study of Hubei Province, Central China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 740, 140126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alignier, A.; Petit, S.; Bohan, D.A. Relative effects of local management and landscape heterogeneity on weed richness, density, biomass and seed rain at the country-wide level, Great Britain. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2017, 246, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hillmann, E.R.; Rivera-Monroy, V.H.; Nyman, J.A.; La Peyre, M.K. Estuarine submerged aquatic vegetation habitat provides organic carbon storage across a shifting landscape. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 717, 137217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Johnson, R.K.; Carlson, P.; McKie, B.G. Contrasting responses of terrestrial and aquatic consumers in riparian–stream networks to local and landscape level drivers of environmental change. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2021, 57, 115–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pal, S.; Singha, P.; Lepcha, K.; Debanshi, S.; Talukdar, S.; Saha, T.K. Proposing multicriteria decision based valuation of ecosystem services for fragmented landscape in mountainous environment. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2021, 21, 100454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bélisle, A.C.; Wapachee, A.; Asselin, H. From landscape practices to ecosystem services: Landscape valuation in Indigenous contexts. Ecol. Econ. 2021, 179, 106858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosenfield, M.F.; Brown, L.M.; Anand, M. Increasing cover of natural areas at smaller scales can improve the provision of biodiversity and ecosystem services in agroecological mosaic landscapes. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 303, 114248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Fang, C. Factors influencing ecosystem services in the Pearl River Delta, China: Spatiotemporal differentiation and varying importance. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 168, 105477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, M.; Cummings, A.R. An analysis of the influence of the human presence on the distribution of provisioning ecosystem services: A Guyana case study. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 122, 107255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, D.X.; Pearson, D.; Palmer, A.; Lowry, J.; Gray, D.; Dominati, E.J. Quantifying spatial non-stationarity in the relationship between landscape structure and the provision of ecosystem services: An example in the New Zealand hill country. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 808, 152126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rolo, V.; Roces-Diaz, J.V.; Torralba, M.; Kay, S.; Fagerholm, N.; Aviron, S.; Burgess, P.; Crous-Duran, J.; Ferreiro-Dominguez, N.; Graves, A.; et al. Mixtures of forest and agroforestry alleviate trade-offs between ecosystem services in European rural landscapes. Ecosyst. Serv. 2021, 50, 101318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, Y.C.E.; Smith, D.A.E.; Ramesh, T.; Downs, C.T. Landscape-scale drivers of mammalian species richness and functional diversity in forest patches within a mixed land-use mosaic. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 113, 106176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huai, Y.; Lo, H.K.; Ng, K.F. Monocentric versus polycentric urban structure: Case study in Hong Kong. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2021, 151, 99–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mirghaed, F.A.; Mohammadzadeh, M.; Salmanmahiny, A.; Mirkarimi, S.H. Decision scenarios using ecosystem services for land allocation optimization across Gharehsoo watershed in northern Iran. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 117, 106645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Service | Cultivated land | Forest | Grassland | Water | Construction land | Unused land | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Provision | Food provision | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.26 |
Freshwater supply | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.24 | |
Regulation | Gas regulation | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.40 |
Climate regulation | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.39 | |
Hydrological regulation | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.49 | |
Soil maintenance | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.49 | |
Cultural service | Culture and entertainment | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.24 |
Aesthetic value | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.36 | |
Natural heritage and diversity | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.53 |
Service | Cultivated Land | Forest | Grassland | Water | Construction Land | Unused Land | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Provision | Food provision | 1277.00 | 390.50 | 31.51 | 190.89 | 0.00 | 2.34 |
Freshwater supply | 383.10 | 390.50 | 31.51 | 272.69 | 0.00 | 2.16 | |
Regulation | Gas regulation | 638.50 | 702.91 | 44.12 | 190.89 | 0.00 | 3.60 |
Climate regulation | 638.50 | 702.91 | 44.12 | 163.62 | 0.00 | 3.51 | |
Hydrological regulation | 766.20 | 702.91 | 50.42 | 245.42 | 0.00 | 4.41 | |
Soil maintenance | 893.90 | 702.91 | 56.72 | 136.35 | 0.00 | 4.41 | |
Cultural service | Culture and entertainment | 383.10 | 468.60 | 37.81 | 190.89 | 158.37 | 2.16 |
Aesthetic value | 510.80 | 702.91 | 50.42 | 245.42 | 118.78 | 3.24 | |
Natural heritage and diversity | 638.50 | 702.91 | 44.12 | 218.15 | 79.18 | 4.77 |
City | Capital City | Prefecture-Level City | County-Level City | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | Urban Districts | Suburban District | County | District | County-Level City | |
Provision | Food provision (2020) | 0.21 | 2.68 | 7.84 | 1.49 | 6.70 |
Freshwater supply (2020) | 0.17 | 1.45 | 4.94 | 0.91 | 3.34 | |
Provision ESV (2020) | 0.39 | 4.13 | 12.78 | 2.39 | 10.04 | |
Optimisation value | 0.44 | 4.56 | 13.52 | 2.60 | 11.24 | |
Growth rate | 12.55% | 10.52% | 5.85% | 8.44% | 11.97% | |
Regulation | Gas regulation (2020) | 0.16 | 1.81 | 7.87 | 1.19 | 4.77 |
Climate regulation (2020) | 0.15 | 1.74 | 7.80 | 1.15 | 4.68 | |
Hydrological regulation (2020) | 0.20 | 2.14 | 8.49 | 1.36 | 5.50 | |
Soil maintenance (2020) | 0.16 | 2.09 | 8.67 | 1.33 | 5.69 | |
Regulation ESV (2020) | 0.68 | 7.78 | 32.83 | 5.03 | 20.64 | |
Optimisation value | 0.79 | 8.82 | 36.02 | 5.64 | 23.61 | |
Growth rate | 16.23% | 13.33% | 9.71% | 12.18% | 14.37% | |
Cultural service | Culture and entertainment (2020) | 0.27 | 1.56 | 5.62 | 1.05 | 3.90 |
Aesthetic value (2020) | 0.28 | 1.94 | 7.84 | 1.32 | 4.94 | |
Natural heritage and diversity (2020) | 0.25 | 2.01 | 8.11 | 1.32 | 5.18 | |
Cultural service ESV (2020) | 0.80 | 5.51 | 21.57 | 3.69 | 14.02 | |
Optimisation value | 0.83 | 5.72 | 21.76 | 3.78 | 14.76 | |
Growth rate | 4.50% | 3.64% | 0.88% | 2.35% | 5.27% |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, Y.; Zeng, C.; Liu, Z.; Cai, B.; Zhang, Y. Integrating Landscape Pattern into Characterising and Optimising Ecosystem Services for Regional Sustainable Development. Land 2022, 11, 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010140
Li Y, Zeng C, Liu Z, Cai B, Zhang Y. Integrating Landscape Pattern into Characterising and Optimising Ecosystem Services for Regional Sustainable Development. Land. 2022; 11(1):140. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010140
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Yangbiao, Chen Zeng, Zhixin Liu, Bingqian Cai, and Yang Zhang. 2022. "Integrating Landscape Pattern into Characterising and Optimising Ecosystem Services for Regional Sustainable Development" Land 11, no. 1: 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010140
APA StyleLi, Y., Zeng, C., Liu, Z., Cai, B., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Integrating Landscape Pattern into Characterising and Optimising Ecosystem Services for Regional Sustainable Development. Land, 11(1), 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010140