Next Article in Journal
Evaluating Landscape Attractiveness with Geospatial Data, A Case Study in Flanders, Belgium
Previous Article in Journal
Monitoring and Modeling the Patterns and Trends of Urban Growth Using Urban Sprawl Matrix and CA-Markov Model: A Case Study of Karachi, Pakistan
Review

Situating China in the Global Effort to Combat Desertification

1
Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
2
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
3
Institute of Desertification Studies, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Saskia Keesstra
Land 2021, 10(7), 702; https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070702
Received: 31 May 2021 / Revised: 25 June 2021 / Accepted: 29 June 2021 / Published: 2 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Soil-Sediment-Water Systems)
International efforts to tackle desertification led by the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) support participatory approaches. The emphasis has been on dialogue between different perspectives, which are often grounded in individualism rather than prioritizing society as a whole, and as a result progress in implementation has been slow. China has made substantial progress in tackling desertification, but its approaches have been controversial, and the sustainability of its achievements has been questioned. While China has been active in UNCCD processes, its approach to addressing desertification has differed from those of other countries. China can thus offer important insights into the international campaign, while acknowledging that China can also learn from the efforts of others. We compare the UNCCD’s “bottom-up” approach and China’s “top-down” approach to better understand the challenges of tackling desertification. We examine the evolution in how desertification has been addressed and shed light on the context behind the changes, focusing on the role of science, policies, and public participation. We find a convergence between top-down and bottom-up approaches and that similar challenges have been experienced. Constant communications with outsiders have enabled adjustments and changes in both China and the international community, even though their approaches remain distinct. We conclude that both approaches are moving toward solutions that start from proactive investments of governments in financial, legal, institutional, and organizational aspects, draw on scientific insights, and which are grounded in the motivated and voluntary participation of non-state actors. Improved sharing of lessons across these approaches would help to create a better enabling form of environmental governance that contributes to tackling desertification. View Full-Text
Keywords: land degradation; UNCCD; bottom-up; top-down; environmental governance; science into policy land degradation; UNCCD; bottom-up; top-down; environmental governance; science into policy
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kong, Z.-H.; Stringer, L.; Paavola, J.; Lu, Q. Situating China in the Global Effort to Combat Desertification. Land 2021, 10, 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070702

AMA Style

Kong Z-H, Stringer L, Paavola J, Lu Q. Situating China in the Global Effort to Combat Desertification. Land. 2021; 10(7):702. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070702

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kong, Zheng-Hong, Lindsay Stringer, Jouni Paavola, and Qi Lu. 2021. "Situating China in the Global Effort to Combat Desertification" Land 10, no. 7: 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070702

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop