Next Article in Journal
Insights into Public Visual Behaviors through Eye-Tracking Tests: A Study Based on National Park System Pilot Area Landscapes
Next Article in Special Issue
Land Administration Maintenance: A Review of the Persistent Problem and Emerging Fit-for-Purpose Solutions
Previous Article in Journal
The Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Urban-Rural Coordinated Development and Its Driving Forces in Yangtze River Delta
Previous Article in Special Issue
Do Design Science Research and Design Thinking Processes Improve the ‘Fit’ of the Fit-For-Purpose Approach to Securing Land Tenure for All in South Africa?
Article

Quality Assurance for Spatial Data Collected in Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration Approaches in Colombia

Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá 11021-110231588, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Stig Enemark and Christiaan Lemmen
Land 2021, 10(5), 496; https://doi.org/10.3390/land10050496
Received: 9 February 2021 / Revised: 7 April 2021 / Accepted: 22 April 2021 / Published: 7 May 2021
The Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration (FFPLA) approach uses flexible techniques under basic regulations, avoiding complicated systems and aiming to fulfill the objective of land tenure security for all. In addition, a land administration system should evolve, starting as a simple system in rural areas and gradually evolving into a more complex system in more populated areas where requirements and quality increase progressively. The system can develop to a precision system. Implementing the FFPLA methodology in Colombia has allowed processes to be developed for data capture in the field using real-time technology and efficient methods for information management. These processes are under quality control by applying technical specifications in alignment with the FFPLA principles. This article presents the results of creating a FFPLA quality assurance model, which includes the application of the ISO 19100 family of technical standards based on the product’s life cycle and quality model concepts. Furthermore, the article documents essential aspects for controlling the quality of the parcel boundary data collected in the field, using direct and indirect methods to measure the applicable spatial data quality elements (logical consistency and positional accuracy) preserving FFPLA principles. View Full-Text
Keywords: land administration; fit for purpose; spatial data quality; spatial data quality assurance land administration; fit for purpose; spatial data quality; spatial data quality assurance
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Rocha, L.A.; Montoya, J.; Ortiz, A. Quality Assurance for Spatial Data Collected in Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration Approaches in Colombia. Land 2021, 10, 496. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10050496

AMA Style

Rocha LA, Montoya J, Ortiz A. Quality Assurance for Spatial Data Collected in Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration Approaches in Colombia. Land. 2021; 10(5):496. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10050496

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rocha, Luz A.; Montoya, Jonathan; Ortiz, Alvaro. 2021. "Quality Assurance for Spatial Data Collected in Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration Approaches in Colombia" Land 10, no. 5: 496. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10050496

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop