Next Article in Journal
Successes of Restoration and Its Effect on the Fish Community in a Freshwater Tidal Embayment of the Potomac River, USA
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of a Station Based Climate Database for SWAT and APEX Assessments in the US
Previous Article in Journal
Probabilistic Models for the Peak Residential Water Demand
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sensitivity of Calibrated Parameters and Water Resource Estimates on Different Objective Functions and Optimization Algorithms
Open AccessArticle

Using Modeling Tools to Better Understand Permafrost Hydrology

ECOLAB, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INPT, UPS, 31055 Toulouse, France
P.I. Melnikov Permafrost Institute, SB RAS, Merzlotnaya Str. 36, 677010 Yakutsk, Sakha Republic, Russia
Ugra Research Institute of Information Technologies, Mira Str. 151, 628011 Khanty-Mansiysk, Russia
Spatial Science Laboratory in the Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Karim Abbaspour
Water 2017, 9(6), 418;
Received: 27 April 2017 / Revised: 23 May 2017 / Accepted: 26 May 2017 / Published: 10 June 2017
Modification of the hydrological cycle and, subsequently, of other global cycles is expected in Arctic watersheds owing to global change. Future climate scenarios imply widespread permafrost degradation caused by an increase in air temperature, and the expected effect on permafrost hydrology is immense. This study aims at analyzing, and quantifying the daily water transfer in the largest Arctic river system, the Yenisei River in central Siberia, Russia, partially underlain by permafrost. The semi-distributed SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) hydrological model has been calibrated and validated at a daily time step in historical discharge simulations for the 2003–2014 period. The model parameters have been adjusted to embrace the hydrological features of permafrost. SWAT is shown capable to estimate water fluxes at a daily time step, especially during unfrozen periods, once are considered specific climatic and soils conditions adapted to a permafrost watershed. The model simulates average annual contribution to runoff of 263 millimeters per year (mm yr−1) distributed as 152 mm yr−1 (58%) of surface runoff, 103 mm yr−1 (39%) of lateral flow and 8 mm yr−1 (3%) of return flow from the aquifer. These results are integrated on a reduced basin area downstream from large dams and are closer to observations than previous modeling exercises. View Full-Text
Keywords: permafrost; modeling; hydrology; water; Yenisei River; SWAT permafrost; modeling; hydrology; water; Yenisei River; SWAT
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Fabre, C.; Sauvage, S.; Tananaev, N.; Srinivasan, R.; Teisserenc, R.; Sánchez Pérez, J.M. Using Modeling Tools to Better Understand Permafrost Hydrology. Water 2017, 9, 418.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop