Next Article in Journal
Robust Initial Wetness Condition Framework of an Event-Based Rainfall–Runoff Model Using Remotely Sensed Soil Moisture
Previous Article in Journal
Determination of the Geogenic Metal Background in Surface Water: Benchmarking Methodology for the Rivers of Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
Open AccessArticle

Extreme Precipitation Frequency Analysis Using a Minimum Density Power Divergence Estimator

1
Department of Civil Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea
2
Department of Statistics, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2017, 9(2), 81; https://doi.org/10.3390/w9020081
Received: 11 October 2016 / Accepted: 24 January 2017 / Published: 27 January 2017
The recently observed hydrologic extremes are unlike what has been experienced so far. Both the magnitude and frequency of extremes are important indicators that determine the flood safety design criteria. Therefore, how are design criteria updated faced with these extremes? Both a sudden increase of design rainfall by the inclusion of these extremes and complete ignorance are inappropriate. In this study, the changes in extremes were examined and an alternative way to estimate the design rainfall amounts was developed using the data from 60 stations in South Korea. The minimum density power divergence estimator (MDPDE) with the optimal value of a tuning parameter, α, was suggested as an alternative estimator instead of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE); its performance was evaluated using the Gumbel (GUM) and the generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution. The results revealed an increase in both the frequency and magnitude of extreme events over the last two decades, which imply that the extremes are already occurring. The performance of the MDPDE was evaluated. The results revealed decreased and adjusted values of the design rainfall compared to MLE. On the other hand, the MDPDE of the GEV distribution with a positive shape parameter, ξ, does not show its advantage conditionally because the GEV distribution has a heavier right tail than the GUM distribution (ξ = 0). In contrast, the results showed the high sensitivity of the MLE to the extremes compared to MDPDE. View Full-Text
Keywords: flood frequency analysis; minimum density power divergence estimator; extreme rainfall; robust estimation flood frequency analysis; minimum density power divergence estimator; extreme rainfall; robust estimation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Seo, Y.; Hwang, J.; Kim, B. Extreme Precipitation Frequency Analysis Using a Minimum Density Power Divergence Estimator. Water 2017, 9, 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9020081

AMA Style

Seo Y, Hwang J, Kim B. Extreme Precipitation Frequency Analysis Using a Minimum Density Power Divergence Estimator. Water. 2017; 9(2):81. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9020081

Chicago/Turabian Style

Seo, Yongwon; Hwang, Junshik; Kim, Byungsoo. 2017. "Extreme Precipitation Frequency Analysis Using a Minimum Density Power Divergence Estimator" Water 9, no. 2: 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9020081

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop