Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Water Footprint of Industrial Tomato Cultivations in the Pinios River Basin: Soil Properties Interactions
Previous Article in Journal
A New Rapid Simplified Model for Urban Rainstorm Inundation with Low Data Requirements
Previous Article in Special Issue
Using Water Footprints to Identify Alternatives for Conserving Local Water Resources in California
Article

Analysis of Influencing Factors of Water Footprint Based on the STIRPAT Model: Evidence from the Beijing Agricultural Sector

by 1, 1,*, 2 and 1
1
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2
Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Science and Engineering, School of Materials Science & Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Arjen Y. Hoekstra
Water 2016, 8(11), 513; https://doi.org/10.3390/w8110513
Received: 17 August 2016 / Revised: 29 October 2016 / Accepted: 1 November 2016 / Published: 5 November 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Footprint Assessment)
Beijing suffers from a severe water shortage. To find the key factors that impact the agricultural water footprint (WF) within Beijing to relieve the pressure on water resources, this study quantifies the agricultural WF within Beijing from 1980 to 2012 and examines the factors of population, urbanization level, GDP per capita, Engel coefficient, and total rural power using an extended stochastic impact by regression on population, affluence and technology (STIRPAT) model. Ridge regression is employed to fit the extended STIRPAT model. The empirical results reveal that the Engel coefficient, which is defined as the total amount of food expenses accounted for the proportion of total personal consumption expenditures, has the largest positive impact on the increase in the agricultural WF, followed by urbanization. In contrast, total rural power, population, and GDP per capita can decrease the agricultural WF. Finally, policy recommendations from technological development, agriculture plantation structure adjustment, and virtual water imports are provided to cope with water shortages. View Full-Text
Keywords: water footprint; STIRPAT model; agricultural sector; influencing factors; Beijing water footprint; STIRPAT model; agricultural sector; influencing factors; Beijing
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, C.; Huang, K.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, Y. Analysis of Influencing Factors of Water Footprint Based on the STIRPAT Model: Evidence from the Beijing Agricultural Sector. Water 2016, 8, 513. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8110513

AMA Style

Jin C, Huang K, Yu Y, Zhang Y. Analysis of Influencing Factors of Water Footprint Based on the STIRPAT Model: Evidence from the Beijing Agricultural Sector. Water. 2016; 8(11):513. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8110513

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Chen, Kai Huang, Yajuan Yu, and Yue Zhang. 2016. "Analysis of Influencing Factors of Water Footprint Based on the STIRPAT Model: Evidence from the Beijing Agricultural Sector" Water 8, no. 11: 513. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8110513

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop