Next Article in Journal
Smart Technological Urban Flood Management Strategies Are “Must-Do” Approaches: The Case of Chinese Coastal Megacity, Ningbo, East Coast of China
Previous Article in Journal
Marine Pollution in Panama: A Bibliometric Approach to Knowledge Gaps and Institutional Influence
Previous Article in Special Issue
Risk-Informed Multiobjective Optimization of Reservoir Operation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Integrated Approaches to Water Resources and Environmental Management: Innovations in Simulation and Impact Assessment

1
Advanced Interdisciplinary Institute of Satellite Applications, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Disaster Risk Reduction, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Water 2026, 18(3), 428; https://doi.org/10.3390/w18030428
Submission received: 29 January 2026 / Accepted: 5 February 2026 / Published: 6 February 2026

1. Introduction

Water resources and environmental systems face unprecedented pressure from the combined effects of climate change, rapid urbanization, population growth, land-use transformation, and intensifying economic activities [1,2]. These stresses manifest not only as more frequent and severe hydrological extremes, such as floods and droughts, but also as chronic challenges, including water scarcity, ecosystem degradation, groundwater depletion, and declining water quality [3,4]. Concurrently, societal demands for greater water security, environmental protection, and sustainable development have placed water managers within an increasingly complex decision-making landscape [5].
Historically, water resources management often employed sector-specific and deterministic approaches, treating surface water, groundwater, water quality, and ecological systems in relative isolation. However, it is now widely recognized that water systems function as tightly coupled human–natural systems characterized by nonlinear interactions, feedback loops, and multi-scale dynamics [6]. Interventions in one part of the system—such as reservoir regulation, land-use change, or groundwater abstraction—can trigger cascading effects across hydrological, ecological, and socio-economic domains, often yielding unintended consequences [7]. This complexity necessitates a shift from fragmented management toward integrated approaches that explicitly account for cross-sectoral linkages, multiple objectives, and systemic uncertainties [8,9].
Recent advances in computational power, environmental monitoring, and data science offer new opportunities to support this transition. Physically based simulation models are increasingly integrated with data-driven methods, remote sensing, and real-time observations to enhance the representation of hydrological and environmental processes [10,11]. Optimization techniques are evolving from single-objective formulations toward multiobjective and risk-informed frameworks capable of explicitly addressing trade-offs among competing goals, such as water supply, flood control, energy production, ecological flows, and water quality [12]. Meanwhile, parallel developments in digital twins, data assimilation, and machine learning-assisted modeling are reshaping how water systems are monitored, simulated, and managed in both planning and operational contexts [13].
Equally important is the growing understanding that effective water and environmental management extends beyond physical system modeling. Governance structures, institutional capacity, public perception, and behavioral responses critically influence management outcomes [9]. For instance, policies aimed at pollution reduction or conservation may succeed or fail based on communication strategies, stakeholder engagement, and regional governance efficacy [14]. Thus, contemporary integrated water management must bridge engineering, environmental science, social science, and policy analysis, forming a truly interdisciplinary field [15].
Within this context, this Special Issue, “Integrated Approaches to Water Resources and Environmental Management: Innovations in Simulation and Impact Assessment”, presents nine contributions that illustrate how innovative methodologies are being developed and applied to address real-world water challenges. Spanning a wide range of spatial scales—from individual wells and reservoirs to river basins and national governance systems—the papers cover diverse themes, including reservoir operation under uncertainty, digital twin applications for groundwater resilience, coupling water management with carbon emissions and economic valuation, ecological habitat simulation, watershed water quality prediction, sediment nutrient release risks, hydrological data reconstruction, environmental communication, and governance efficiency assessment.
Despite their diversity, these studies share a common theme: they move beyond isolated analyses to embrace integration—across processes, disciplines, objectives, and data sources. They also emphasize comprehensive impact assessment, evaluating not only hydrological responses but also the ecological, environmental, economic, and institutional consequences of water-related decisions [16]. In doing so, they reflect the ongoing paradigm shift from purely supply-oriented water development toward risk-aware, sustainability-focused, and resilience-driven management [12].
It is our hope that the research compiled in this Special Issue will advance both methodological innovation and practical application, supporting decision-makers in navigating the growing complexity of water resources and environmental systems in a changing world.

2. Overview of the Published Articles

The nine contributions to this Special Issue focus on simulation and optimization as decision-support tools in complex water systems.
Tang and Wang (Contribution 1) develop a risk-informed multiobjective optimization model for reservoir operation to enhance drought management in water-scarce regions. Recognizing that traditional strategies often prioritize water supply reliability or economic efficiency while underestimating the risks of extreme droughts, the authors introduce a framework incorporating three key performance indicators: reliability, resilience, and vulnerability (RRV). This approach better captures the dynamic behavior of water supply systems under prolonged stress and balances trade-offs between maintaining supply, accelerating recovery, and minimizing shortage impacts. Applied to a multisource regional system centered on the Nierji Reservoir, the model demonstrates superior performance under drought scenarios compared to conventional strategies, reducing the duration and severity of supply disruptions while increasing overall reliability. The study identifies resilience as the most influential objective, offering a flexible framework for adaptive reservoir operation under climate-induced drought risk.
In Contribution 2, Cohen-Manrique et al. present an innovative application of digital twin (DT) technology for the resilience-based management of the confined Morroa Aquifer in Colombia. Their framework integrates historical data, hydrogeological information, in situ sensors, and satellite-derived climate data. A resilience-oriented control model regulates groundwater extraction to maintain sustainable aquifer conditions. Among the tested optimization techniques, particle swarm optimization (PSO) performed best in minimizing model error and identifying an optimal pumping rate to stabilize groundwater levels. Simulations indicate that current extraction practices are unsustainable. The study advances practical implementation by deploying a functional DT prototype in a monitoring well, illustrating how real-time monitoring coupled with virtual simulation can enhance adaptive groundwater management.
Odriozola et al. (Contribution 3) develop an integrated modeling framework that combines CO2 emission assessment with economic valuation to guide sustainable water management in the arid Segura River Basin, Spain. The framework links sector-specific water use (agriculture, industry, urban, recreational, environmental) to both carbon footprints and economic returns. Results reveal significant heterogeneity: agricultural water use is relatively low-carbon and economically productive, whereas urban and industrial uses are highly energy-intensive. The analysis also highlights the economic penalty of using desalinated water for agriculture. By quantifying trade-offs between environmental sustainability and economic performance, the framework provides actionable insights for optimizing water allocation in water-stressed regions.
In their work (Contribution 4), Gibson et al. investigate the psychological and behavioral factors influencing consumer intentions to purchase single-use bottled water, aiming to mitigate plastic pollution. Using survey data from the southeastern U.S. and structural equation modeling, the study finds that knowledge, cognitive beliefs, and affective beliefs collectively explain a significant portion of attitudes and purchase intentions. The results underscore that interventions targeting both factual knowledge and emotional attachments can effectively reduce bottled water consumption. The study offers evidence-based guidance for designing communication strategies to promote sustainable consumer behavior.
Cromwell et al. (Contribution 5) simulate the potential impacts of future water availability on protected species habitat in Barka Slough, a perennial wetland in California. Extending a historical hydrologic model to 2051 under two climate scenarios, the study projects that groundwater depletion may shift the wetland from perennial to ephemeral status. Key habitat metrics—streamflow, stream disconnection, and groundwater depth—are projected to deteriorate, adversely affecting several federally listed species, particularly under a drier, warmer future scenario. The findings provide critical guidance for water management strategies aimed at sustaining groundwater resources and protecting vulnerable aquatic habitats under climate change.
Meanwhile, Alnahit et al. (Contribution 6) evaluate the influence of land use metrics on stream water quality across 113 watersheds in the southeastern U.S. Comparing four spatial weighting methods, the study demonstrates that approaches accounting for the proximity and hydrological connectivity of land uses (e.g., agricultural and industrial areas) to streams and outlets significantly improve water quality predictions over a simple lumped method. The research underscores the importance of spatially explicit land use metrics for effective watershed-scale water quality management and planning.
Watson et al. (Contribution 7) assess the risk of internal phosphorus (P) loading from sediments in eight drinking water reservoirs. Analyzing sediment P fractions, the study finds high iron content, indicating substantial potential for redox-driven P release despite currently low labile P levels. The dominance of calcium-bound P reflects catchment geology. The findings highlight that internal loading remains a critical driver of eutrophication and water quality impairment even after external nutrient controls are implemented, emphasizing the need for routine sediment monitoring to inform reservoir management.
In Contribution 8, Can et al. present a quantitative approach for reconstructing missing groundwater level data in wells near Lake Uluabat, Turkey, using Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR). The model, driven by lake levels and seasonal indicators, achieves high predictive accuracy and preserves key statistical properties of the original time series. This work demonstrates GBR as an effective tool for data imputation, facilitating robust hydrological analysis and decision-making in data-scarce contexts.
Finally, Zhao and Yang (Contribution 9) analyze the efficiency of water environment governance (WEGE) across 283 Chinese prefecture-level cities from 2013 to 2022. Using a Super-SBM model and spatial analysis techniques, the study finds generally low WEGE, with a spatial pattern of “western > central > eastern” regions. Regional disparities are primarily driven by intra-group differences. While σ-convergence is limited, both absolute and conditional β-convergence are observed. The analysis identifies positive effects of government intervention and negative influences from factors like artificial intelligence deployment and industrial upgrading on efficiency, underscoring the need for regionally tailored and collaborative governance strategies.

3. Conclusions

The contributions to this Special Issue collectively underscore three key trends in contemporary water resources and environmental management research:
(1)
There is a clear movement toward integration across domains—hydrology, ecology, economics, climate, and governance—enabled by advances in simulation, optimization, and data analytics. Water management is increasingly framed as a multi-objective, interconnected systems challenge rather than a series of isolated sectoral problems.
(2)
Risk and uncertainty are now central considerations. From reservoir operation to groundwater resilience and ecological protection, multiple studies explicitly incorporate uncertainty, demonstrating the necessity of robust, adaptive strategies under non-stationary conditions.
(3)
The Issue reaffirms that technical innovation must be coupled with social and institutional understanding. Effective communication, governance efficiency, and policy performance are shown to be as critical as advanced hydrological modeling for achieving sustainable outcomes.
Together, these nine papers illustrate how integrated approaches—combining models, data, optimization, and comprehensive impact assessment—can support more resilient, efficient, and environmentally responsible water management. It is our hope that this collection will stimulate further interdisciplinary research and encourage the practical adoption of these innovations in managing the world’s water systems.

Acknowledgments

As Guest Editor of the Special Issue “Integrated Approaches to Water Resources and Environmental Management: Innovations in Simulation and Impact Assessment”, I would like to express my deep appreciation to all authors whose valuable work was published as part of this Issue and thus contributed to the success of the edition.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Tang, R.; Wang, Y. Risk-Informed Multiobjective Optimization of Reservoir Operation. Water 2025, 17, 2467.
  • Cohen-Manrique, C.; Villa-Ramírez, J.; Camacho-León, S.; Solano-Correa, Y.; Alvarez-Month, A.; Coronado-Hernández, O. Simulation and Optimisation Using a Digital Twin for Resilience-Based Management of Confined Aquifers. Water 2025, 17, 1973.
  • Odriozola, J.; Flores, M.; Lainez-Oyuela, W.; Maiza, M. Integrating CO2 Emissions and Economic Value Modeling for Sustainable Water Management: Insights from the Segura River Basin. Water 2025, 17, 1865.
  • Gibson, K.; Lamm, A.; Lamm, K.; Holt, J.; Woosnam, K. Communicating About Single-Use Bottled Water to Mitigate Ecosystem Pollution. Water 2025, 17, 1298.
  • Cromwell, G.; Culling, D.; Young, M.; Larsen, J. Simulated Effects of Future Water Availability and Protected Species Habitat in a Perennial Wetland, Santa Barbara County, California. Water 2025, 17, 1238.
  • Alnahit, A.; Mishra, A.; Khan, A. Evaluation of Various Land Use Metrics for Enhancing Stream Water Quality Predictions. Water 2025, 17, 849.
  • Watson, S.; Bell, V.; Kille, P.; Rand, J.; Bryant, L.; Perkins, R. Assessing the Risk of Internal Loading of Phosphorus from Drinking Reservoir Sediments. Water 2025, 17, 799.
  • Can, M.; Vaheddoost, B.; Safari, M. Data Reconstruction for Groundwater Wells Proximal to Lakes: A Quantitative Assessment for Hydrological Data Imputation. Water 2025, 17, 718.
  • Zhao, X.; Yang, D. Research on Regional Disparities, Dynamic Evolution, and Influencing Factors of Water Environment Governance Efficiency in China. Water 2025, 17, 515.

References

  1. Milly, P.C.D.; Betancourt, J.; Falkenmark, M.; Hirsch, R.M.; Kundzewicz, Z.W.; Lettenmaier, D.P.; Stouffer, R.J.; Dettinger, M.D.; Krysanova, V. On critiques of “Stationarity is dead: Whither water management?”. Water Resour. Res. 2015, 51, 7785–7789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vörösmarty, C.J.; McIntyre, P.B.; Gessner, M.O.; Dudgeon, D.; Prusevich, A.; Green, P.; Glidden, S.; Bunn, S.E.; Sullivan, C.A.; Liermann, C.R.; et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 2010, 467, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Parmesan, C.; Morecroft, M.D.; Trisurat, Y. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability; GIEC: Guangzhou, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gleeson, T.; Cuthbert, M.; Ferguson, G.; Perrone, D. Global groundwater sustainability, resources, and systems in the Anthropocene. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2020, 48, 431–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cosgrove, W.J.; Loucks, D.P. Water management: Current and future challenges and research directions. Water Resour. Res. 2015, 51, 4823–4839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sivapalan, M.; Savenije, H.H.; Blöschl, G. Socio-hydrology: A new science of people and water. Hydrol. Process. 2012, 26, 1270–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, J.; Mooney, H.; Hull, V.; Davis, S.J.; Gaskell, J.; Hertel, T.; Lubchenco, J.; Seto, K.C.; Gleick, P.; Kremen, C.; et al. Systems integration for global sustainability. Science 2015, 347, 1258832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Grigg, N.S. Integrated Water Resource Management: An Interdisciplinary Approach; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pahl-Wostl, C. Governance of the water-energy-food security nexus: A multi-level coordination challenge. Environ. Sci. Policy 2019, 92, 356–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shen, C.; Laloy, E.; Elshorbagy, A.; Albert, A.; Bales, J.; Chang, F.-J.; Ganguly, S.; Hsu, K.-L.; Kifer, D.; Fang, Z.; et al. HESS Opinions: Incubating deep-learning-powered hydrologic science advances as a community. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2018, 22, 5639–5656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Addor, N.; Melsen, L. Legacy, rather than adequacy, drives the selection of hydrological models. Water Resour. Res. 2019, 55, 378–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Herman, J.D.; Quinn, J.D.; Steinschneider, S.; Giuliani, M.; Fletcher, S. Climate adaptation as a control problem: Review and perspectives on dynamic water resources planning under uncertainty. Water Resour. Res. 2020, 56, e24389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Willard, J.; Jia, X.; Xu, S.; Steinbach, M.; Kumar, V. Integrating physics-based modeling with machine learning: A survey. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2003.04919. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cosens, B.; Gunderson, L. Practical Panarchy for Adaptive Water Governance; Springer International: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bhaduri, A.; Bogardi, J.; Siddiqi, A.; Voigt, H.; Vörösmarty, C.; Pahl-Wostl, C.; Bunn, S.E.; Shrivastava, P.; Lawford, R.; Foster, S.; et al. Achieving sustainable development goals from a water perspective. Front. Environ. Sci. 2016, 4, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Marchau, V.A.; Walker, W.E.; Bloemen, P.J.T.M.; Popper, S.W. Decision Making Under Deep Uncertainty: From Theory to Practice; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y. Integrated Approaches to Water Resources and Environmental Management: Innovations in Simulation and Impact Assessment. Water 2026, 18, 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18030428

AMA Style

Wang Y. Integrated Approaches to Water Resources and Environmental Management: Innovations in Simulation and Impact Assessment. Water. 2026; 18(3):428. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18030428

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yuntao. 2026. "Integrated Approaches to Water Resources and Environmental Management: Innovations in Simulation and Impact Assessment" Water 18, no. 3: 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18030428

APA Style

Wang, Y. (2026). Integrated Approaches to Water Resources and Environmental Management: Innovations in Simulation and Impact Assessment. Water, 18(3), 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18030428

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop