Hydrodynamic Mechanisms and Collaborative Optimization of Perforated Plate Grid Revetments: Integrating Flume Tests with LES
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Scaled Physical Model Tests
2.2. Measurement Methods and Data Analysis
2.2.1. Hydrodynamic Parameter Measurement
2.2.2. Quantitative Measurement of Bed Morphology
2.2.3. Data Processing and Uncertainty Analysis
2.3. Development and Validation of the CFD Framework
2.3.1. Computational Domain and Mesh Strategy
2.3.2. Turbulence Model and Numerical Schemes
2.3.3. Initialization and Statistical Sampling
2.3.4. Model Validation
2.4. Integrated Study of Flume Tests and LES Numerical Simulation
2.4.1. Flume Tests for Scour Resistance Curves
2.4.2. LES-Based Water Exchange Capacity Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Results of Scour Resistance Optimization Tests
3.2. Results of Water Exchange Capacity Optimization Tests
3.2.1. Flow Field Characteristics
3.2.2. Water Exchange Capacity Statistics
4. Discussion
4.1. Roughness Hydrodynamics and Flow Regime Classification
4.2. Hierarchical Optimization Strategy
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Grill, G.; Lehner, B.; Thieme, M.; Geenen, B.; Tickner, D.; Antonelli, F.; Babu, S.; Borrelli, P.; Cheng, L.; Crochetiere, H.; et al. Mapping the world’s free-flowing rivers. Nature 2019, 569, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arora, S.; Kumar, B. Effect of emergent vegetation on riverbank erosion with sediment mining. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 11193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Labelle, L.; Baudron, P.; Barbecot, F.; Bichai, F.; Masse-Dufresne, J. Identification of riverbank filtration sites at watershed scale: A geochemical and isotopic framework. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 864, 160964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, S.; Yang, L.; Fang, J. Comprehensive evaluation of urban river ecological bank protection based on AHP-TOPSIS method. Environ. Technol. 2025, 46, 1201–1214. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Gonçalves, C.; Verdelhos, T.; Caçador, I.; Oliveira, P.J.V.; Marques, D.; Veríssimo, H. Effectiveness of eco-engineering structures to promote sediment particles retention in estuarine salt marshes. Water 2023, 17, 678. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, J.Z.; Berkowitz, J.F.; White, J.R. Trajectory of coastal wetland soil physical and microbial properties 6+ years after thin layer placement sediment amendment. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2023, 13, 1605785. [Google Scholar]
- Ławniczak-malińska, A. Effect of water level reduction on the littoral zone in terms of its efficiency in lake protection. Water 2023, 15, 5563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, C.; Yang, Z.; Liu, C.; Dong, X.; Wang, X.; Zhuang, C.; Zhao, L. Win-win-win pathway for ecological restoration by balancing hydrological, ecological, and agricultural dimensions: Contrasting lessons from highly eroded agroforestry. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 774, 145140. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Xiao, Q.; Lu, Y.; Fu, Z.; Chen, F. Study on hydrodynamic characteristics of ecological slope protection structure with hole plate grid. In Proceedings of the 24th IAHR-APD Congress, Wuhan, China, 14–17 October 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Y.; Su, C.; Zhu, Q.; Yang, C.; Yang, Y. Field study of a new ecological slope protection method applied to expansive soil slope. Arab. J. Geosci. 2021, 14, 2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, M.T.T.; Chueasamat, A.; Saito, H.; Kohgo, Y. Performance of filter gabion with pipe as a simple countermeasure against slope failures due to torrential rainfalls. In Proceedings of the 7th Asia-Pacific Conference on Unsaturated Soils (AP-UNSAT2019); Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication: Tokyo, Japan, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, S.; Melville, B.W.; Khan, M.M.; Shoaib, M.; Shamseldin, A. Effect of baffles on the hydraulic performance of sediment retention ponds. Water Sci. Technol. 2017, 75, 1991–1996. [Google Scholar] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Leonardi, S.; Orlandi, P.; Antonia, R.A. Properties of d- and k-type roughness in a turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 2007, 19, 125101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castro, I.P.; Cheng, H.; Reynolds, R. Turbulence over urban-type roughness: Deductions from wind-tunnel measurements. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 2006, 118, 109–131. [Google Scholar]
- De Marchis, M.; Saccone, D.; Milici, B.; Napoli, E. Large Eddy Simulations of Rough Turbulent Channel Flows Bounded by Irregular Roughness: Advances Toward a Universal Roughness Correlation. Flow Turbul. Combust. 2019, 105, 627–648. [Google Scholar]
- Bruno, F.; Leonardi, S.; De Marchis, M. Towards a new roughness parametrization through the effective distribution function. J. Fluid Mech. 2024, 999, A26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashrafian, A.; Andersson, H.I.; Manhart, M. DNS of turbulent flow in a rod-roughened channel. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 2004, 25, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazzarotto, G.; Camporese, M.; Salandin, P. Insights on Permeable Pavement Hydraulic Performance from Large-Scale Laboratory Experiments and Physically Based Modelling; European Geosciences Union General Assembly: Vienna, Austria, 2024; p. EGU24-19732. [Google Scholar]
- Oumeraci, H.; Staal, T.; Pfoertner, S.; Kudella, M.; Schimmels, S.; Verhagen, H.J. Hydraulic performance of elastomeric bonded permeable revetments and subsoil response to wave loads. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Coastal Engineering, Shanghai, China, 30 June–5 July 2010; p. 509. [Google Scholar]
- Das, V.K.; Hansda, S.; Debnath, K.; Chaudhuri, S. Riverbank stabilization based on the modulation of the near bank turbulence scales. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 15290–15313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mulahasan, S.; Saleh, M.S.; Muhsun, S.S. Simulation of flow around a permeable dike using physical and 3D-CFD models. Int. J. River Basin Manag. 2023, 21, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.Y.; Huai, W.X.; Ji, B. Characteristics of the flow structures through and around a submerged canopy patch. Phys. Fluids 2021, 33, 035144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.H.; Liu, B.Q.; Zhu, R.Y. Investigation on unsteady flow characteristics of an artificial-submerged cavitating jet based on the LES approach. Ocean Eng. 2025, 316, 119989. [Google Scholar]
- Wang Zy Li, S. Numerical simulation of cubic artificial reef under large eddy in passive scalar model. Oceanol. Limnol. Sin. 2021, 52, 1376–1387. [Google Scholar]
- Valentine, E.M.; Wood, I.R. Longitudinal dispersion with dead zones. J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE 1977, 103, 975–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weitbrecht, V.; Socolofsky, S.A.; Jirka, G.H. Experiments on mass exchange between groin fields and main stream in rivers. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2008, 134, 1734–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tafarojnoruz, A.; Loprieno, P.; Fiorini Morosini, A.; Leone, E.; Francone, A.; Fella, N.; Lupo, F.; Dell’Anna, F.; Lauria, A.; Tomasicchio, G.R. CFD-Based Hydraulic Performance Improvement of a Chlorine Contact Tank: The Case Study of a Southern Italy Plant. Fluids 2025, 10, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Yan, J.; Chen, S.; Liu, J.; Jin, F.; Wang, B. Gridded cemented riprap for scour protection around monopile in the marine environment. Ocean Eng. 2023, 272, 113876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chabokpour, J. Experimental and analytical investigation of hydraulic conductivity, energy dissipation, and drag forces in gradually varied flow conditions through rockfill media. Adv. Res. Water Wastewater 2024, 11, 116–123. [Google Scholar]
- Maslov, D.; Pereira, E.; Duarte, D. Numerical analysis of the flow field and cross section design implications in a multifunctional artificial reef. Ocean Eng. 2023, 272, 113817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayes, E.; Higgins, S.; Mullan, D.; Geris, J. High-resolution assessment of riverbank erosion and stabilization techniques with associated water quality implications. Int. J. River Basin. Manag. 2024, 22, 611–625. [Google Scholar]
- Fall, M.; Sarr, D.; Abdoulaye, S.O. Modelling and dimensioning of a natural riprap protection dike against coastal erosion on the Djiffère and Joal Spit. Int. J. Res. Rev. 2025, 12, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Z.; Xie, Y.; Zou, W. Hydromechanical responses of geogrid-reinforced expansive soil cutting slopes: Field monitoring and numerical simulation. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 2025, 47, 1757–1766. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, P.; Wang, L.; Xu, J.; Wang, Z.; Ahmerkamp, S.; Bartzke, G.; Wu, M.; Han, J.; Zhu, H. Effects of porous structures on point source dispersion across the sediment–water interface. AQUA 2024, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rathjens, H.; Miguez, M.B.; Winchell, M.; Sur, R. Evaluation of SEAWAVE–QEX in a high agricultural intensity catchment in Belgium. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2022, 19, 513–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Slavin, E.I.; Wain, D.J.; Bryant, L.D.; Amani, M.; Perkins, R.G.; Blenkinsopp, C.; Simoncelli, S.; Hurley, S. The effects of surface mixers on stratification, dissolved oxygen, and cyanobacteria in a shallow eutrophic reservoir. Water Resour. Res. 2022, 58, e2021WR030068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]









| Parameter | Prototype/Criterion | Model/Value | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geometric scale, | - | 3 | Undistorted model |
| Velocity scale, | 1.732 | Froude similitude | |
| Reynolds number, | Turbulent regime | Fully turbulent | |
| Froude number, | Subcritical | <0.3 | Supports rigid-lid LES |
| Shields parameter, | Mobile-bed range | Mobile-bed range | Scour is dynamically representative |
| Aperture ratio, | Preserved | Preserved | Geometric similarity maintained |
| Incipient velocity | m/s | m/s | Tang Cunben’s criterion satisfied |
| Morphological time scale, | - | 13.6 | 1.5 h model ≈ 3 days prototype |
| LES Test No. | Opening Ratio (φ ) | Offset Angle (°) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.24 | 0 |
| 2 | 0.40 | 0 |
| 3 | 0.56 | 0 |
| 4 | 0.24 | 15 |
| 5 | 0.40 | 15 |
| 6 | 0.56 | 15 |
| Opening Ratio (φ ) | Mean Inter-Cavity Exchange Rate | Mean Cavity Mainstream Exchange Rate |
|---|---|---|
| 0.24 | 1.0 × 10−3 | 0.16 |
| 0.40 | 3.9 × 10−3 | 0.13 |
| 0.56 | 1.6 × 10−3 | 0.12 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Lu, Y.; Xiao, Q.; Fu, Z.; Chen, F.; Jiang, T. Hydrodynamic Mechanisms and Collaborative Optimization of Perforated Plate Grid Revetments: Integrating Flume Tests with LES. Water 2026, 18, 1572. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18131572
Lu Y, Xiao Q, Fu Z, Chen F, Jiang T. Hydrodynamic Mechanisms and Collaborative Optimization of Perforated Plate Grid Revetments: Integrating Flume Tests with LES. Water. 2026; 18(13):1572. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18131572
Chicago/Turabian StyleLu, Yang, Qinghua Xiao, Zhongmin Fu, Fei Chen, and Tengyu Jiang. 2026. "Hydrodynamic Mechanisms and Collaborative Optimization of Perforated Plate Grid Revetments: Integrating Flume Tests with LES" Water 18, no. 13: 1572. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18131572
APA StyleLu, Y., Xiao, Q., Fu, Z., Chen, F., & Jiang, T. (2026). Hydrodynamic Mechanisms and Collaborative Optimization of Perforated Plate Grid Revetments: Integrating Flume Tests with LES. Water, 18(13), 1572. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18131572

