Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Patterns of Water Conservation and Its Soil Driving Forces
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data
2.3. Methods
2.3.1. Water Conservation
2.3.2. Spatiotemporal Trend Analysis
2.3.3. Principal Component Analysis and OLS Regression
3. Results
3.1. Spatiotemporal Variation in WC in Guangdong Province
3.2. Spatiotemporal Variation in WC in Different Soil Types
3.3. Soil Components Associated with WC in Guangdong Province
4. Discussion
4.1. Spatiotemporal Pattern of WC in Guangdong Province
4.2. Differences in WC of Different Soil Types
4.3. Analysis of Soil Factors Affecting WC in Guangdong Province
4.4. Limitations and Future Directions
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| WC | Water conservation |
| NGD | Northern Guangdong |
| EGD | Eastern Guangdong |
| WGD | Western Guangdong |
| PRD | Pearl River Delta |
| GD | Guangdong |
| PCA | Principal component analysis |
| PC | Principal component |
| SAND | Soil sand content ratio |
| CLAY | Soil clay content ratio |
| ORG_CARBON | Soil organic carbon content ratio |
| BULK | Bulk density |
| TEXTURE | Soil texture |
| PH | PH in water |
| CEC_SOIL | The cation exchange capacity of soil |
| CEC_CLAY | The cation exchange capacity of clay |
| TEB | Total exchangeable bases |
| BSAT | Base saturation |
| TAWC | Total available water capacity |
| ECEC | Effective cation exchange capacity |
| ESP | Exchangeable sodium percentage |
| ALSA | Aluminum saturation |
| TCEQ | Total carbonate carbon |
| ELCO | Electrical conductivity |
| TOTN | Total nitrogen content |
| CNRT | Carbon-to-nitrogen ratio |
References
- Wang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Fu, J.; Wei, W. Effects of the Grain for Green Program on the water ecosystem services in an arid area of China—Using the Shiyang River Basin as an example. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 104, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, S.; Xiao, Y.; Zheng, H.; Xiao, Y.; Ouyang, Z. Spatial patterns of ecosystem water conservation in China and its impact factors analysis. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2017, 37, 2455–2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denissen, J.M.C.; Teuling, A.J.; Pitman, A.J.; Koirala, S.; Migliavacca, M.; Li, W.; Reichstein, M.; Winkler, A.J.; Zhan, C.; Orth, R. Widespread shift from ecosystem energy to water limitation with climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 2022, 12, 677–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van den Berg, T.E.; Dutta, S.; Kaiser, E.; Vialet-Chabrand, S.; van der Ploeg, M.; van Emmerik, T.; Coenders-Gerrits, M.; ten Veldhuis, M.-C. Plants, vital players in the terrestrial water cycle. In Instrumentation and Measurement Technologies for Water Cycle Management; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Gudmundsson, L.; Hauser, M.; Qin, D.; Li, S.; Seneviratne, S.I. Soil moisture dominates dryness stress on ecosystem production globally. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yin, J.; D’Odorico, P.; Porporato, A. Soil moisture dynamics in water-limited ecosystems. In Dryland Ecohydrology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 31–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wankmüller, F.J.P.; Delval, L.; Lehmann, P.; Baur, M.J.; Cecere, A.; Wolf, S.; Or, D.; Javaux, M.; Carminati, A. Global influence of soil texture on ecosystem water limitation. Nature 2024, 635, 631–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Li, Q.; Yu, E.; Deng, L.; Deng, S.; Liu, Z.; Lian, H. Upscaling subalpine forest soil water-holding capacity based on vegetation and environmental factors: An example of the Zagunao River watershed in the upper reach of the Minjiang River in China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2023, 43, 5614–5626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Du, S.; Deng, L.; Zhu, W.; Liu, G. Effects of different soil porosity on the water conservation of typical vegetation system in western Sichuan. Sci. Soil Water Conserv. 2023, 21, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monneveux, P.; Rekika, D.; Acevedo, E.; Merah, O. Effect of drought on leaf gas exchange, carbon isotope discrimination, transpiration efficiency and productivity in field grown durum wheat genotypes. Plant Sci. 2006, 170, 867–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, G.; Tian, S.; Liang, S.; Jing, Y.; Chen, R.; Wang, W.; Han, B. Dynamic evolution trend and driving mechanisms of water conservation in the Yellow River Basin, China. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 26304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, M.; Di, Z.; Yao, Y.; Ma, Q. Variations in water conservation function and attributions in the Three-River Source Region of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau based on the SWAT model. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2024, 349, 109956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.; Xiang, Y.; Heng, C.K.; Li, X. Spatiotemporal evolution and interaction of water constraints and their socio-ecological drivers in the Taihu Lake Basin. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 949, 175155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dai, L.; Xu, Z. The effect of soil porosity size distribution on integral energy content of water in different moisture slopes. Water Supply 2023, 23, 3950–3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, F.; Wang, S.; Qin, F.; Luo, Y.; Wang, D.; Liu, J.; Sun, Y. Effect of Different Fruit-Crop Compounds on Soil Phys-io-chemical Properties and Soil-water Conservation in Gully Region of Plateau. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2020, 34, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, G.; Chen, H.H.; Li, J.; Wu, D.; Xu, X.L. Exploring the spatiotemporal evolution and risk factors for total factor energy productivity in Guangdong Province, China. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 373, 123395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nkonya, E.M. Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Yao, L.; Leng, G.; Yu, L.; Li, H.; Tang, Q.; Python, A.; Hall, J.W.; Liao, X.; Li, J.; Qiu, J.; et al. Emergent constraints on global soil moisture projections under climate change. Commun. Earth Environ. 2025, 6, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, G.; Han, X.; Zhang, C.; Li, J.; Liu, J. Virtual Water Flows Embodied in International and Interprovincial Trade of Yellow River Basin: A Multiregional Input-Output Analysis. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Shen, X.; Wei, Y.; Zhou, X.; Cai, C. Soil depth mapping and its linkage to gully erosion rate prediction in granite areas of southern China. Soil Tillage Res. 2023, 231, 105711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xian, C.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L. Assessing sustainable water utilization from a holistic view: A case study of Guangdong, China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 76, 103428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Liu, L.; Zhang, S. Integrated model framework for the evaluation and prediction of the water environmental carrying capacity in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 130, 108083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, S.; Fang, L.; Yang, J.; Zhou, R.; Bai, G.; Qiu, Y. The Spatial-Temporal Matching Characteristics of Water Resources and Socio-Economic Development Factors: A Case Study of Guangdong Province. Water 2024, 16, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, L.; Wu, Z.; Huang, X. Exploring the relationship between ecosystem services and sustainable development goals in Guangdong province, China. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 169, 112907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Government GPPs. Guangdong Provincial Main Function Zone Plan (Gov. Order No. 120). 2012. Available online: https://www.gd.gov.cn/gkmlpt/content/0/146/post_146572.html (accessed on 14 June 2026).
- Sharp, R.; Chaplin-Kramer, R.; Wood, S.; Guerry, A.; Douglass, J. InVEST User’s Guide; Stanford University: Stanford, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, J.; Li, S.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Liu, Q.; Meng, Q.; Lin, A.; Li, J. Trade-off analyses and optimization of water-related ecosystem services (WRESs) based on land use change in a typical agricultural watershed, southern China. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 279, 123851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Sun, X.; Ma, J.; Xu, S. Scale effects on the relationships of water-related ecosystem services in Guangdong Province, China. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 2022, 44, 101278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, C.; Qiu, D.; Gao, P.; Mu, X.; Zhao, G. Application of the InVEST model for assessing water yield and its response to precipitation and land use in the Weihe River Basin, China. J. Arid. Land 2022, 14, 426–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brauman, K.A.; Daily, G.C.; Duarte, T.K.; Mooney, H.A. The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2007, 32, 67–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, J.; Li, Z.; Feng, Q.; Gui, J.; Zhang, B. Spatiotemporal variations of water conservation and its influencing factors in ecological barrier region, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 2022, 42, 101164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Qiao, J.; Li, M.; Huang, M. Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of ecosystem service interactions and their drivers at different spatial scales in the Yellow River Basin. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 908, 168486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Ye, A.; Peng, D.; Miao, C.; Di, Z.; Gong, W. Spatiotemporal variations in water conservation function of the Tibetan Plateau under climate change based on InVEST model. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 2022, 41, 101064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, K.; Ma, L.; Xu, J.; Yu, H.; Zhang, X. Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics and Driving Factors of Water Conservation Service in Jiangxi Province from 2001 to 2020. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, M.; Hu, J.; Chen, X.; Lü, Y.; Yang, L. Comparison of Five Models for Estimating the Water Retention Service of a Typical Alpine Wetland Region in the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 6306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, X.; Zhou, B.; Lü, X.; Yang, Z. Evaluation of water conservation function in mountain forest areas of Beijing based on InVEST model. Sci. Silvae Sin. 2012, 48, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, W.; Li, G.; Li, Z. Spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of the water conservation function and its driving factors in regional lake wetlands—Two types of homogeneous lakes as examples. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 130, 108069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geng, X.; Wang, X.; Yan, H.; Zhang, Q.; Jin, G. Land Use/Land Cover Change Induced Impacts on Water Supply Service in the Upper Reach of Heihe River Basin. Sustainability 2015, 7, 366–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Gao, M.; Li, Z.; Ma, J.; Peng, J. How Do Driving Factors Affect Vegetation Coverage Change in the Shaanxi Region of the Qinling Mountains? Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Musonda, B.; Jing, Y.; Iyakaremye, V.; Ojara, M. Analysis of Long-Term Variations of Drought Characteristics Using Standardized Precipitation Index over Zambia. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Wu, G.; Ma, B.; Wu, T.; Wang, X.; Wu, Q. Revealing climatic and groundwater impacts on the spatiotemporal variations in vegetation coverage in marine sedimentary basins of the North China Plain, China. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 10085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, H.-J.; Zhao, C.-Y.; Wang, X.-P.; Chen, S.-Y.; Shan, S.-Y.; Chen, T.; Qi, X.-L. Spatial differentiation of determinants for water conservation dynamics in a dryland mountain. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 362, 132574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouslihim, Y.; John, K.; Miftah, A.; Azmi, R.; Aboutayeb, R.; Bouasria, A.; Razouk, R.; Hssaini, L. The effect of covariates on Soil Organic Matter and pH variability: A digital soil mapping approach using random forest model. Ann. GIS 2024, 30, 215–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pouladi, N.; Jafarzadeh, A.A.; Shahbazi, F.; Ghorbani, M.A.; Greve, M.H. Assessing the soil quality index as affected by two land use scenarios in Miandoab region. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Xie, X.; Wang, X.; Feng, X.; Hou, X.; Wang, S.; Lin, K.; Huang, M.; Jia, S.; Hou, Y. Distribution Pattern of Soil Organic Carbon and Its Regional Humification Constant in the Coastal Monsoon Region of Eastern China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, Q.; Yang, Y.; Yang, R.; Zha, L.-S.; Lin, Z.-Q.; Shang, S.-H. Spatial Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services in Guangdong Province, China. Land 2024, 13, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Q.; Li, Y.; Guo, J.; Wu, X. Assessment of Water Conservation Function of Forest Ecosystem in Yunhe County, Zhejiang Province. Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Pekin. 2015, 51, 888–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Kong, L.; Yang, H.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, Y. Water Content Variations and Pepper Water-Use Efficiency of Yunnan Laterite Under Root-Zone Micro-Irrigation. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 918288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qian, Z.; Tang, L.; Zhuang, S.; Zou, Y.; Fu, D.; Chen, X. Effects of biochar amendments on soil water retention characteristics of red soil at south China. Biochar 2020, 2, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Ning, K.; Chen, J.; Liu, C.; Wang, D.; Nie, X.; Hu, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, T. Soil and water conservation effects driven by the implementation of ecological restoration projects: Evidence from the red soil hilly region of China in the last three decades. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 260, 121109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olorunfemi, I.; Fasinmirin, J.; Ojo, A. Modeling cation exchange capacity and soil water holding capacity from basic soil properties. Eurasian J. Soil Sci. 2016, 5, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dey, R.; Sharma, S.B.; Thakkar, M.G. Maximising ecological value and assessing land suitability for sustainable grassland management in Asia’s largest tropical grassland, Western India. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 13658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shetty, R.; Prakash, N.B. Effect of different biochars on acid soil and growth parameters of rice plants under aluminium toxicity. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liang, Y.; Bai, T.; Liu, B.; Yu, W.; Teng, W. Different antioxidant regulation mechanisms in response to aluminum-induced oxidative stress in Eucalyptus species. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 241, 113748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lu, H.-L.; Dong, G.; Hua, H.; Zhao, W.-R.; Li, J.-Y.; Xu, R.-K. Method for initially selecting Al-tolerant rice varieties based on the charge characteristics of their roots. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 187, 109813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, L.; Cui, J.; Cai, Y.; Yang, S.; Liu, J.; Wang, W.; Gai, J.; Hu, Z.; Li, Y. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Two Contrasting Soybean Varieties in Response to Aluminum Toxicity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ganiyu, S.A.; Are, K.S.; Olurin, O.T. Assessment of geotechnical and physico-chemical properties of age-long greywater-contaminated soils in basement complex areas, southwest Nigeria. Appl. Water Sci. 2020, 10, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nsengumuremyi, C.; Fischer, E.; Nsabimana, D.; Zaninka, M.C.; Senyanzobe, J.; Uwimana, B. Sustainable Agroforestry for Soil Chemical Properties Improvement and Nutrients Availability in Agriculture Landscape around Cyamudongo Isolated Forest, Rwanda. Turk. J. Agric.-Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 10, 2516–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, C.; Guo, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Guo, Y.; Chai, M.; Liang, X.; Bi, R. Spatial and temporal changes of farmland soil acidification and their influencing factors in different regions of Guangdong Province, China. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2019, 30, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pikaar, I.; de Vrieze, J.; Rabaey, K.; Herrero, M.; Smith, P.; Verstraete, W. Carbon emission avoidance and capture by producing in-reactor microbial biomass based food, feed and slow release fertilizer: Potentials and limitations. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 644, 1525–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pries, C.E.H.; Ryals, R.; Zhu, B.; Min, K.; Cooper, A.; Goldsmith, S.; Pett-Ridge, J.; Torn, M.; Berhe, A.A. The Deep Soil Organic Carbon Response to Global Change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2023, 54, 375–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soinne, H.; Keskinen, R.; Tähtikarhu, M.; Kuva, J.; Hyväluoma, J. Effects of Organic Carbon and Clay Contents on Structure-Related Properties of Arable Soils with High Clay Content. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2023, 74, e13424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bachofen, C.; Tumber-Dávila, S.J.; Mackay, D.S.; McDowell, N.G.; Carminati, A.; Klein, T.; Stocker, B.D.; Mencuccini, M.; Grossiord, C. Tree Water Uptake Patterns across the Globe. New Phytol. 2024, 242, 1891–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pushpanjali; Reddy, K.S.; Dhimate, A.S.; Karthikeyan, K.; Samuel, J.; Reddy, A.G.K.; Kumar, N.R.; Rao, K.V.; Pankaj, P.K.; Rohit, J.; et al. Soil Preferential Flow Dynamics in the Southern Drylands of India—A Watershed Based Approach. Front. Water 2025, 6, 1457680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Truong, T.H.H.; Marschner, P. Plant residues differing in C/N ratio in mulch and soil—The effect of the mulch on nutrient availability and microbial biomass is more pronounced with higher leaching amount. Soil Ecol. Lett. 2020, 2, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, C.; Liu, W.; Li, J.; Wu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Kader, R. Dynamic change of soil aggregate stability and infiltration properties during crop growth under four tillage measures in Mollisols region of northeast China. Front. Earth Sci. 2024, 12, 1357467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rupngam, T.; Messiga, A.J. Unraveling the Interactions between Flooding Dynamics and Agricultural Productivity in a Changing Climate. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, H.; Zeng, F.; Peng, W.; Wang, K.; Zhang, H.; Liu, L.; Song, T. Carbon Storage in a Eucalyptus Plantation Chronosequence in Southern China. Forests 2015, 6, 1763–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Göl, C.; ÇiçEk, M. The Investigation of Some Soil and Morphological Properties of Trees in Conversion of Marsh into Eucalyptus camaldulensis (Dehn) Different Ages Plantation, (Mediterranean Region—Turkey). Kastamonu Univ. J. For. Fac. 2019, 19, 197–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, J.; Yuan, W.; Wang, Y.-P.; Zhang, Q. Adaptive Carbon Allocation by Plants Enhances the Terrestrial Carbon Sink. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]










| The Region | Area/km2 | Area Percentage/% | The Municipal Administrative Units Included |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGD | 76,751 | 42.71 | Shaoguan, Heyuan, Meizhou, Qingyuan, and Yunfu. |
| EGD | 15,496 | 8.62 | Shantou, Chaozhou, Jieyang and Shanwei. |
| WGD | 32,682 | 18.17 | Zhanjiang, Maoming and Yangjiang. |
| PRD | 54,767 | 30.50 | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Zhuhai, Foshan, Jiangmen, Dongguan, Zhongshan, Huizhou and Zhaoqing. |
| Data | Source | Data Description |
|---|---|---|
| Meteorological data | National Tibetan Plateau Science Data Center (https://data.tpdc.ac.cn) (accessed on 14 June 2026) | The dataset includes precipitation and annual average evapotranspiration, with a resolution of 1000 m |
| Land use and land cover | China Land Cover Dataset (CLCD) (https://zenodo.org/record/5210928#.YuXtgtBBw2y) (accessed on 14 June 2026) | 30 m resolution |
| Root depth | International Soil Reference and Information Centre (https://data.isric.org/) (accessed on 14 June 2026) | 1000 m resolution |
| Plant available water content (PAWC) | International Soil Reference and Information Centre (https://data.isric.org/) (accessed on 14 June 2026) | 1000 m resolution |
| Biophysical table | According to the InVEST model manual [26] and the relevant studies [27,28] | The dataset includes parameter values such as plant evapotranspiration coefficient and velocity coefficient, with a resolution of 1000 m |
| Digital elevation model (DEM) | Geospatial Data Cloud Platform of Chinese Academy of Sciences (http://www.gscloud.cn) (accessed on 14 June 2026) | 500 m resolution |
| Ksat | Harmonized World Soil Database (https://www.fao.org/) (accessed on 14 June 2026) | Based on the soil texture data, calculated by the SPAW software (version 6.02.75; Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA ) |
| Soil type | Resource and Environmental Science Data Center (RESDC), Chinese Academy of Sciences (http://www.resdc.cn) (accessed on 14 June 2026) | 1000 m resolution |
| HWSD2.0 | Harmonized World Soil Database (https://www.fao.org/) (accessed on 14 June 2026) | The dataset includes material such as sand content (%) and clay content (%), with a resolution of 1000 m |
| The WISE30sec database | International Soil Reference and Information Centre (https://data.isric.org/) (accessed on 14 June 2026) | The dataset includes material such as total nitrogen content and exchangeable sodium percentage, with a resolution of 1000 m |
| Lucode | LULC_desc | Kc | Root_depth (mm) | LULC_veg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cropland | 0.65 | 1000 | 1 |
| 2 | Forest | 0.9 | 6500 | 1 |
| 3 | Grassland | 0.65 | 2000 | 1 |
| 4 | Water | 1 | 1000 | 0 |
| 5 | Building land | 0.3 | 10 | 0 |
| 6 | Unutilized land | 0.2 | 10 | 0 |
| Z | Trends | |
|---|---|---|
| Extremely significant improvement | ||
| Significant improvement | ||
| Stability | ||
| Significant degradation | ||
| Extremely significant degradation |
| Abbreviation | Full Name |
|---|---|
| SAND | Sand content |
| CLAY | Clay content |
| ORG_CARBON | Soil organic carbon content |
| BULK | Bulk density |
| TEXTURE | Soil texture |
| PH | Soil pH |
| CEC_SOIL | Cation exchange capacity of soil |
| CEC_CLAY | Cation exchange capacity of clay |
| TEB | Total exchangeable bases |
| BSAT | Base saturation |
| TAWC | Total available water capacity |
| ECEC | Effective cation exchange capacity |
| ESP | Exchangeable sodium percentage |
| ALSA | Aluminum saturation |
| TCEQ | Total carbonate carbon |
| ELCO | Electrical conductivity |
| TOTN | Total nitrogen content |
| CNRT | Carbon-to-nitrogen ratio |
| The Z Value | R2 | PBIAS | NSE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.84 | 8.44% | 0.48 |
| 1.5 | 0.70 | 4.04% | 0.42 |
| 2 | 0.85 | −1.17% | 0.72 |
| 2.5 | 0.85 | −3.90% | 0.67 |
| Region | Precipitation vs. Mean WC Depth, r | p | Precipitation vs. WC Volume, r | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRD | 0.986 | <0.001 | 0.990 | <0.001 |
| NGD | 0.997 | <0.001 | 0.997 | <0.001 |
| EGD | 0.986 | <0.001 | 0.990 | <0.001 |
| WGD | 0.980 | <0.001 | 0.980 | <0.001 |
| Region | n | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2015 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GD | 21 | 263.82 ± 29.76 | 259.29 ± 29.38 | 292.00 ± 38.65 | 230.14 ± 26.55 | 228.67 ± 29.31 |
| NGD | 5 | 324.29 ± 103.59 | 331.67 ± 59.92 | 381.59 ± 63.81 | 294.09 ± 54.52 | 300.83 ± 57.15 |
| EGD | 4 | 244.24 ± 31.41 | 218.09 ± 31.78 | 215.71 ± 36.01 | 187.77 ± 41.89 | 165.78 ± 37.01 |
| WGD | 3 | 208.81 ± 84.45 | 227.92 ± 219.38 | 327.95 ± 305.20 | 246.00 ± 188.78 | 234.82 ± 196.78 |
| PRD | 9 | 257.25 ± 42.83 | 247.85 ± 38.51 | 264.15 ± 45.18 | 208.17 ± 32.13 | 214.48 ± 34.92 |
| Region | Sen’s Slope mm/Year | Z | p | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRD | 2.196 | 0.815 | 0.415 | Non-significant increase |
| NGD | 3.030 | 0.755 | 0.450 | Non-significant increase |
| EGD | 0.230 | 0.030 | 0.976 | Non-significant increase |
| WGD | 4.433 | 1.600 | 0.110 | Non-significant increase |
| LULC_desc | 2000 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cropland | Forest | Grassland | Water | Building Land | Unutilized Land | Sum (km2) | ||
| 2020 | Cropland | 11,914.35 | 1824.94 | 21.53 | 977.1 | 194.11 | 0.76 | 14,932.86 |
| Forest | 2079.28 | 27,211.52 | 5.35 | 48.69 | 12.28 | 0.05 | 29,357.17 | |
| Grassland | 15.28 | 10.99 | 2.13 | 3.120 | 0.55 | 0.21 | 32.37 | |
| Water | 591.60 | 46.43 | 6.63 | 2041.44 | 42.23 | 1.91 | 2730.24 | |
| Building land | 2835.70 | 226.57 | 37.66 | 475.66 | 3189.27 | 2.04 | 6766.89 | |
| Unutilized land | 7.82 | 1.07 | 0.69 | 7.30 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 17.82 | |
| Sum (km2) | 17,444.03 | 29,321.51 | 73.99 | 3553.46 | 3438.91 | 5.44 | 53,837.36 | |
| Soil Type | Average Annual WC/mm | Sen’s Slope/mm·yr−1 | Z | p | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red soil | 419.05 | 3.548 | 0.755 | 0.4503 | Non-significant increase |
| Paddy soil | 308.97 | 1.599 | 0.574 | 0.5661 | Non-significant increase |
| Latosol | 209.37 | 2.251 | 1.178 | 0.2389 | Non-significant increase |
| Lateritic red soil | 208.34 | 3.061 | 1.419 | 0.1558 | Non-significant increase |
| Soil Type | Mean PNWC | Min | Max | Theil–Sen Slope | Z | p | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red soil | 0.2480 | 0.183 | 0.3043 | 0.001215 | 0.513 | 0.608 | Stable |
| Paddy soil | 0.1763 | 0.1350 | 0.2092 | 0.000419 | 0.393 | 0.695 | Stable |
| Latosol | 0.1176 | 0.0838 | 0.1457 | 0.000797 | 0.996 | 0.319 | Stable |
| Lateritic red soil | 0.1171 | 0.0757 | 0.1455 | 0.001685 | 2.265 | 0.024 | Significant improvement |
| Soil Layer | Cumulative Variance (%) | R2 | Adjusted R2 | F | p | DW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | 87.857 | 0.184 | 0.183 | 394.256 | <0.001 | 2.007 |
| L2 | 86.924 | 0.184 | 0.184 | 395.769 | <0.001 | 1.991 |
| L3 | 87.999 | 0.219 | 0.219 | 392.578 | <0.001 | 1.990 |
| L4 | 84.071 | 0.041 | 0.040 | 75.244 | <0.001 | 1.946 |
| L5 | 86.638 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 206.712 | <0.001 | 1.996 |
| L6 | 87.441 | 0.153 | 0.153 | 322.492 | <0.001 | 2.002 |
| L7 | 85.394 | 0.398 | 0.398 | 722.023 | <0.001 | 2.023 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Yan, X.; Zhan, Q.; Dai, S.; Zang, C. Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Patterns of Water Conservation and Its Soil Driving Forces. Water 2026, 18, 1508. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18121508
Yan X, Zhan Q, Dai S, Zang C. Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Patterns of Water Conservation and Its Soil Driving Forces. Water. 2026; 18(12):1508. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18121508
Chicago/Turabian StyleYan, Xiaolei, Qianwen Zhan, Seping Dai, and Chuanfu Zang. 2026. "Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Patterns of Water Conservation and Its Soil Driving Forces" Water 18, no. 12: 1508. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18121508
APA StyleYan, X., Zhan, Q., Dai, S., & Zang, C. (2026). Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Patterns of Water Conservation and Its Soil Driving Forces. Water, 18(12), 1508. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18121508

