The Impact of Surface Water Organic Matter Characteristics on Coagulation Efficiency
Highlights
- High-molecular-weight organic fractions (>2.0 kDa) showed the highest coagula-tion removal efficiency
- UV254 absorbance and color at 410 nm proved effective surrogate parameters for process monitoring
- Organic matter characteristics strongly influenced coagulant demand and treat-ment performance
- Spectrophotometric measurements enabled optimization of coagulation and re-duction in treatment costs
Abstract
1. Introduction
- to determine the relationships between changes in water quality parameters during coagulation,
- to assess the feasibility of using routine spectrophotometric measurements to evaluate the course of the coagulation process,
- determining the relationships between changes in water quality parameters during coagulation that enable the prediction of required coagulant doses, and thus the optimization of its consumption and the reduction in water treatment costs.
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Properties of Raw Waters
3.2. Coagulation Efficiency
4. Conclusions
- Coagulation efficiency primarily depends on the TOC content in the raw waters and increases with higher values of this parameter. Furthermore, the presence of high-molecular-weight fractions affects the achieved removal of all fractions of organic matter. The absence of particles with molecular weights of 2.3–2.5 kDa in water from WTP1 was a key factor contributing to the lowest overall organic matter removal efficiency observed among the studied systems.
- The efficiency of removing high-molecular-weight organic substances (>2.0 kDa) can be monitored and optimized using UV254 absorbance and color at 410 nm as surrogate parameters, and with molecular weights in the range of 1.3–1.5 kDa, monitoring and optimization should be based on UV272 absorbance and color at 340 nm.
- Regardless of the properties of organic substances present in the water undergoing coagulation, humic substances are preferentially removed, whereas fulvic acids are removed to a much lesser extent.
- The second stage of coagulation requires higher specific coagulant dosages (gAl/gC), which results from the presence of particles with lower molecular weights that are significantly less susceptible to coagulation.
- While the coagulant type did not alter the fundamental relationships observed, achieving comparable efficiency with iron-based coagulants required significantly higher dosages than with aluminum salts.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Edzwald, J.K. Water Quality and Treatment: A Handbook on Drinking Water; AWWA, McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2011. Available online: https://hero.epa.gov/reference/2772990/ (accessed on 3 June 2026).
- Duan, J.; Gregory, J. Coagulation by hydrolysing metal salts. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 100–102, 475–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matilainen, A.; Vepsäläinen, M.; Sillanpää, M. Natural organic matter removal by coagulation during drinking water treatment. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 159, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sillanpää, M.; Ncibi, M.C.; Matilainen, A.; Vepsäläinen, M. Removal of natural organic matter in drinking water treatment by coagulation: A comprehensive review. Chemosphere 2018, 190, 54–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schwarzenbach, R.P.; Escher, B.I.; Fenner, K.; Hofstetter, T.B.; Johnson, C.A.; von Gunten, U.; Wehrli, B. The challenge of micropollutants in aquatic systems. Science 2006, 313, 1072–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vieno, N.M.; Härkki, H.; Tuhkanen, T.; Kronberg, L. Occurrence of pharmaceuticals in river water and their elimination in a pilot-scale drinking water treatment plant. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 5077–5084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Akinnawo, S.O. Adsorptive removal of pesticides from wastewater using conventional and framework materials. Desalination Water Treat. 2025, 321, 100905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Westerhoff, P.; Yoon, Y.; Snyder, S.; Wert, E. Fate of Endocrine-Disruptor, Pharmaceutical, and Personal Care Product Chemicals during Simulated Drinking Water Treatment Processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 6649–6663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Snyder, S.A.; Adham, S.; Redding, A.M.; Cannon, F.S.; DeCarolis, J.; Oppenheimer, J.; Wert, E.C.; Yoon, Y. Role of membranes and activated carbon in the removal of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals. Desalination 2007, 202, 156–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nissinen, T.K.; Miettinen, I.T.; Martikainen, P.J.; Vartiainen, T. Molecular size distribution of natural organic matter in raw and drinking waters. Chemosphere 2001, 45, 865–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knap-Bałdyga, A.; Żubrowska-Sudoł, M. Natural organic matter removal in surface water treatment via coagulation. Current Issues, Potential Solutions, and New Findings. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Łukasiewicz, E. Coagulation–sedimentation in water and wastewater treatment: Removal of pesticides, pharmaceuticals, PFAS, and natural organic matter. Water 2025, 17, 3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andersson, A.; Powers, L.; Harir, M.; Gonsior, M.; Hertkorn, N.; Schmitt-Kopplin, P.; Kylin, H.; Hellström, D.; Pettersson, Ä.; Bastviken, D. Molecular level seasonality of dissolved organic matter in freshwater and its impact on drinking water treatment. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2024, 10, 1964–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baatache, O.; Benalia, A.; Derbal, K.; Khalfaoui, A.; Pizzi, A. Optimized coagulation flocculation of drinking water using pine cone-based bio-coagulants: A comparative study of different extracts. Water 2025, 17, 1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maaghloud, F.E.; Elfoulani, A.A.; Abdou, A.; Chafi, M.; El Hakmaoui, A.; Elmakssoudi, A.; Eddine, J.J.; Akssira, M.; Dakir, M. Improvement of humic acid (HA) removal using a new inorganic–organic composite coagulant: α-costic acid as a modifier of polyaluminum chloride properties. Anal. Sci. 2024, 40, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosińska, A. Emerging Pollutants Challenges for Water and Wastewater Management; Wydawnictwo Politechniki Częstochowskiej: Częstochowa, Poland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Hailu, A.; Sishu, F.K. Application of enhanced coagulation in drinking water treatment to reduce NOM: A major DBP precursor. Water Supply 2025, 25, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- A.P. Instruments. Zeta Potential Monitoring as a Key Element in Controlling the Coagulation Process in Water Treatment; Technical Report; A.P. Instruments: Warsaw, Poland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Song, Q.; Graham, N.; Tang, Y.; Siddique, M.S.; Kimura, K.; Yu, W. The role of medium molecular weight organics on reducing disinfection by-products and fouling prevention in nanofiltration. Water Res. 2022, 215, 118263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jarvis, P.; Jefferson, B.; Parsons, S.A. Floc structural characteristics using conventional coagulation for a high DOC, low alkalinity surface water source. Water Res. 2006, 40, 2727–2737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sillanpää, M. Natural Organic Matter in Water: Characterization and Treatment Methods, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Zafar, R.; Lee, Y.K.; Bibi, M.; Hur, J. Potential impacts of microplastic-derived dissolved organic matter in water and wastewater treatment systems: A critical review and future research needs. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2026, 56, 654–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krupińska, I. Podstawy Teoretyczne i Praktyczne Oczyszczania Wód Podziemnych; Monografie Komitetu Inżynierii Środowiska PAN: Warszawa, Poland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Krupińska, I. Wpływ wybranych czynników na skuteczność usuwania związków próchnicznych z wody w procesie koagulacji. Ochr. Środ. 2012, 34, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
- Gumińska, J.; Kłos, M. Wykorzystanie parametrów barwy i absorbancji UV do oceny efektywności oczyszczania wody. Ochr. Środ. 2012, 34, 23–27. [Google Scholar]
- Delpla, I.; Jung, A.V.; Baures, E.; Clement, M.; Thomas, O. Impacts of climate change on surface water quality in relation to drinking water production. Environ. Int. 2021, 35, 1225–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zularisam, A.S.; Ismail, A.F.; Salim, R. Behaviors of natural organic matter in membrane filtration and coagulation. Desalination 2006, 194, 211–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tak, S.; Vellanki, B.P.; Ahuja, S. A Review on Disinfection and Disinfection Byproducts; Chapter 6; ACS Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, H.; Sun, N.; Li, L.; Ai, J.; Zhou, H.; Yang, X.; Zhang, W. Effects of dissolved organic matter removal and molecular transformation in different water treatment processes on formation of disinfection byproducts. Water Res. 2023, 245, 120626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| Parameter | WTP1 | WTP2 | WTP3 I st | WTP3 II st |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coagulant type | Al2(SO4)3 | Fe2(SO4)3 | Al2(SO4)3 | Al2(SO4)3 |
| Coagulant dose, gAl/m3; gFe/m3 | 2.1–5.4 | 58.6–75.9 | 4.8–6.1 | 3.4–4.2 |
| Sedimentation/flotation time; h | 8–11 | 3–4 | 0.5 | 6–8 |
| Parameter | Unit | WTP1 | WTP2 | WTP3 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I st | II st | ||||||||||||
| Min | Max | SD | Min | Max | SD | Min | Max | SD | Min | Max | SD | ||
| pH | - | 7.0 | 8.0 | 0.1 | 7.1 | 7.8 | 0.1 | 7.6 | 7.9 | 0.1 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 0.1 |
| TOC | gC/m3 | 3.39 | 4.79 | 0.31 | 12.80 | 15.10 | 0.93 | 10.40 | 13.40 | 2.12 | 8.11 | 8.95 | 0.52 |
| DOC | gC/m3 | 2.90 | 4.53 | 0.44 | 11.10 | 13.30 | 0.90 | 9.55 | 11.80 | 1.59 | 7.44 | 7.95 | 0.38 |
| Color410 | gPt/m3 | 8.3 | 16.9 | 2.6 | 40.4 | 74.0 | 7.9 | 40.4 | 53.8 | 9.4 | 11.8 | 14.0 | 0.7 |
| Color340 | gPt/m3 | 6.1 | 11.3 | 1.2 | 38.8 | 53.0 | 5.2 | 28.3 | 39.4 | 7.8 | 11.6 | 12.6 | 0.7 |
| BDOC | gC/m3 | 0.30 | 1.39 | 0.29 | 2.00 | 2.76 | 0.35 | 1.99 | 2.16 | 0.12 | 1.57 | 2.20 | 0.51 |
| UV254 | m−1 | 7.17 | 11.70 | 1.13 | 33.50 | 51.70 | 6.86 | 33.50 | 44.70 | 7.91 | 15.50 | 17.30 | 1.34 |
| UV272 | m−1 | 5.81 | 9.61 | 0.95 | 29.00 | 41.80 | 5.37 | 27.00 | 35.90 | 6.29 | 12.60 | 14.20 | 1.14 |
| ƺ potential | mV | −14.20 | −10.20 | 0.95 | −9.08 | −8.06 | 0.53 | −8.66 | −7.66 | 0.71 | −9.78 | −8.27 | 0.07 |
| 2.3–2.5 kDa | mg/m3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 61.9 | 132.8 | 26.5 | 71.3 | 132.8 | 43.5 | 23.3 | 31.8 | 6.3 |
| 2.3–2.0 kDa | mg/m3 | 1.2 | 4.3 | 0.9 | 34.2 | 56.4 | 9.7 | 38.6 | 57.6 | 13.4 | 27.7 | 36.7 | 7.2 |
| 1.5–1.3 kDa | mg/m3 | 1.9 | 5.8 | 0.8 | 17.9 | 28.8 | 4.7 | 28.2 | 39.4 | 7.9 | 22.8 | 29.2 | 5.3 |
| 0.9–0.7 kDa | mg/m3 | 0.4 | 3.6 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| <0.15 kDa | mg/m3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| SUVA | m2/g | 1.90 | 3.61 | - | 3.19 | 3.88 | - | 3.51 | 3.79 | - | 2.08 | 2.18 | - |
| Relationships | R | α |
|---|---|---|
| Color340 = 0.9796 × UV254 − 1.369 | 0.99 | 0.05 |
| Color410 = 0.5773 × UV272 + 1.0283 | 0.99 | 0.05 |
| UV254 = 1.343 × (2.0–2.5 kDa) − 39.736 | 0.99 | 0.05 |
| Color340 = 4.2389 × (2.0–2.5 kDa) − 32.541 | 0.97 | 0.05 |
| UV272 = 0.8941 × (1.3–1.5 kDa) − 3.0868 | 0.94 | 0.05 |
| Color410 = 0.4979 × (1.3–1.5 kDa) − 1.7398 | 0.90 | 0.05 |
| Parameter | WTP1 | WTP2 | WTP3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I st | II st | |||||||
| Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | |
| TOC | 9.4 | 24.4 | 32.6 | 37.0 | 22.0 | 33.2 | 13.5 | 13.6 |
| DOC | 3.3 | 24.0 | 30.1 | 36.1 | 22.1 | 32.6 | 16.2 | 17.7 |
| Color410 | 24.5 | 42.6 | 67.0 | 73.5 | 65.3 | 78.1 | 45.1 | 46.3 |
| Color340 | 20.3 | 37.0 | 66.2 | 73.2 | 59.0 | 68.0 | 38.6 | 42.8 |
| BDOC | −40.9 | 55.6 | 21.7 | 39.7 | −2.0 ** | 21.1 | −19.1 ** | −18.2 ** |
| UV254 | 16.6 | 100.0 | 63.7 | 69.6 | 53.7 | 61.3 | 26.6 | 30.3 |
| UV272 | 16.6 | 32.5 | 64.1 | 69.1 | 53.3 | 60.4 | 30.9 | 35.0 |
| ƺ potential | 13.4 | 46.4 | −8.6 ** | 9.9 | −12.9 ** | −8.0 ** | −9.7 ** | 6.2 |
| 2.3–2.5 kDa | 82.5 | 88.9 | 67.3 | 76.0 | 36.8 | 76.0 | ||
| 2.3–2.0 kDa | 6.6 | 56.9 | 40.4 | 63.3 | 28.2 | 36.2 | 28.2 | 50.5 |
| 1.5–1.3 kDa | 2.1 | 55.0 | 17.8 | 45.4 | 19.2 | 25.9 | 19.2 | 48.3 |
| 0.9–0.7 kDa | −5.7 ** | 80.2 | −121.9 ** | −23.8 ** | * | * | * | * |
| <0.15 kDa | −11.5 ** | 45.8 | −24.6 ** | 71.6 | * | * | * | * |
| SUVA | 5.3 | 21.5 | 45.1 | 52.4 | 40.6 | 42.6 | 12.4 | 15.3 |
| Correlation | R | α |
|---|---|---|
| ΔUV254 = 0.86 × Δ2.0–2.3 kDa − 1.76 | 0.973 | 0.05 |
| ΔUV272 = 0.38 × Δ1.3–1.5 kDa + 0.04 | 0.965 | 0.05 |
| ΔB410 = 0.56 × Δ2.0–2.3 kDa − 1.72 | 0.967 | 0.05 |
| ΔB340 = 0.29 × Δ1.3–1.5 kDa + 0.06 | 0.954 | 0.05 |
| ηColor410 = 1.7461 × ηTOC + 9.8782 | 0.86 | 0.05 |
| ηColor340 = 1.8294 × ηTOC + 3.7039 | 0.89 | 0.05 |
| ηUV254 = 1.9504 × ηTOC − 3.8892 | 0.94 | 0.05 |
| ηUV272 = 1.8826 × ηTOC − 2.2396 | 0.92 | 0.05 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Solipiwko-Pieścik, A.; Wolska, M.; Kabsch-Korbutowicz, M.; Urbańska-Kozłowska, H. The Impact of Surface Water Organic Matter Characteristics on Coagulation Efficiency. Water 2026, 18, 1427. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18121427
Solipiwko-Pieścik A, Wolska M, Kabsch-Korbutowicz M, Urbańska-Kozłowska H. The Impact of Surface Water Organic Matter Characteristics on Coagulation Efficiency. Water. 2026; 18(12):1427. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18121427
Chicago/Turabian StyleSolipiwko-Pieścik, Anna, Małgorzata Wolska, Małgorzata Kabsch-Korbutowicz, and Halina Urbańska-Kozłowska. 2026. "The Impact of Surface Water Organic Matter Characteristics on Coagulation Efficiency" Water 18, no. 12: 1427. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18121427
APA StyleSolipiwko-Pieścik, A., Wolska, M., Kabsch-Korbutowicz, M., & Urbańska-Kozłowska, H. (2026). The Impact of Surface Water Organic Matter Characteristics on Coagulation Efficiency. Water, 18(12), 1427. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18121427

