Next Article in Journal
Accuracy of the Digital Terrain Model and Its Impact on the Results of Hydraulic Modelling in Floodplains
Previous Article in Journal
Channel Reshaping and Adaptive Management of Inland Tail-End Deltas Under River–Lake Interaction: Model Experiments and Empirical Evidence from the Comprehensive Regulation of the Ganjiang Tail-End Delta
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Statistical Optimization of Eggshell-Derived Bioflocculants for the Harvesting of Chlorella spp. and Nutrient Mitigation in Agricultural Wastewater

by
Katherine Guzmán
1,2,*,
Andrés Izquierdo
1 and
Milton Quinga
3,*
1
Centro de Nanociencia y Nanotecnología, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE, Av. Gral. Rumiñahui s/n, Sangolquí 171103, Ecuador
2
Programa de Doctorado en Química, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (UTPL), Calle París s/n y Praga, Loja 110107, Ecuador
3
Departamento de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE, Av. Gral. Rumiñahui s/n, Sangolquí 171103, Ecuador
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2026, 18(11), 1311; https://doi.org/10.3390/w18111311
Submission received: 10 February 2026 / Revised: 17 March 2026 / Accepted: 19 March 2026 / Published: 29 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Wastewater Treatment and Reuse)

Abstract

This study explores the application of a bioflocculant derived from poultry eggshell waste for the removal of Chlorella spp. and related contaminants from agricultural wastewater using a statistically guided experimental design. In accordance with circular bioeconomy principles, eggshell residues were repurposed as a low-cost and sustainable biomaterial for water treatment. Chlorella spp. was selected as the target microalga due to its rapid proliferation, tolerance to eutrophic environments, and frequent presence in agricultural effluents. A two-level factorial design with center points was applied to evaluate the individual and interactive effects of key operational parameters, including pH, temperature, initial biomass concentration, and bioflocculant dosage. The highest biomass removal efficiency (94%) was achieved at pH 10, a temperature of 18.5 °C, a bioflocculant dose of 100 mg L−1, and an initial biomass concentration of approximately 3.76 × 107 cells mL−1, with a contact time of 360 min. Under these optimized conditions, notable reductions were also observed in chemical oxygen demand (78%), nitrates (87%), phosphates (21%), and coliform bacteria (99.6%). The developed regression model exhibited strong predictive capability (R2 = 0.97), indicating high reproducibility within the investigated experimental conditions. Overall, the findings suggest that eggshell-derived bioflocculants may represent a promising alternative to conventional chemical flocculants for agricultural wastewater treatment. High removal efficiency was achieved at relatively low dosages under operational conditions, supporting the potential of this approach for improving microalgae harvesting and the wastewater treatment processes.

1. Introduction

The uncontrolled discharge of agricultural wastewater, often rich in nitrogen and phosphorus compounds, has become a critical driver of eutrophication and harmful algal blooms (HABs) in freshwater ecosystems. These processes result in oxygen depletion, biodiversity loss, and water quality deterioration, posing serious environmental and public health threats [1,2].
Among the microalgae commonly detected in agricultural effluents, Chlorella spp. is of particular concern due to its rapid growth rate, high resistance to environmental stressors, and strong capacity to assimilate excess nutrients. These characteristics make it both a reliable bioindicator of contamination and an active contributor to eutrophication processes [3,4]. Furthermore, several Chlorella strains have been linked to the production of cyanotoxins, including microcystins, which can accumulate along the food chain and pose significant risks to human health [5]. Its frequent occurrence in agricultural discharges, combined with its metabolic versatility, supports its selection as the target organism for removal in this study.
Although conventional flocculants such as alum and ferric chloride are widely used in water treatment, their application is limited by several drawbacks, including high operational costs, potential toxicity, and the generation of chemically contaminated sludge [6]. In response, bioflocculants have gained attention for their biodegradability and lower toxicity compared to synthetic flocculants [7]. Recent research has investigated a variety of natural sources, including chitosan, plant-derived residues, and microbial exopolysaccharides; however, their production often involves complex processing steps or high resource demands, which restrict large-scale applicability [6,8,9].
Despite their advantages, bioflocculants also present several challenges compared with conventional chemical flocculants. In some cases, higher dosages or longer settling times may be required to reach similar removal efficiencies. In addition, their performance may be influenced by operational parameters such as pH, temperature, and biomass concentration. Furthermore, challenges associated with large-scale production and process stability remain important considerations for their broader industrial implementation [10,11].
Eggshell waste has emerged as a particularly promising raw material for bioflocculant development due to its abundance as a by-product of the poultry industry. Eggshells consist primarily of calcium carbonate (approximately 94% CaCO3), along with smaller fractions of magnesium carbonate, calcium phosphate, type X collagen, sulfated polysaccharides, and proteins. This composition confers a favorable adsorption capacity and effective charge-neutralization properties [12,13,14]. Moreover, the active calcium species can be efficiently extracted using dilute hydrochloric acid (HCl), which increases the solubility of mineral-bound compounds through the following reaction:
CaCO3 + 2HCl → CaCl2 + CO2↑ + H2O
The process involves acid-mediated dissolution of calcium carbonate, thereby releasing soluble calcium ions. The recovered calcium species later participate in the flocculation process. Subsequently, during the flocculation stage, the system pH is raised to alkaline conditions, which promotes destabilization of negatively charged Chlorella cells and enhances aggregation. Under these conditions, the deprotonation of functional groups on Chlorella spp., including amino, carboxyl, phosphate, and hydroxyl moieties, alters the surface charge balance and reduces electrostatic repulsion between cells. Calcium ions present in the system contribute to charging neutralization and cation-bridging interactions, facilitating the formation of larger, staler flocs. As a result, cell–cell interactions are strengthened, promoting aggregation, improving sedimentation, and enhancing the simultaneous removal of biomass and dissolved nutrients [11].
Several authors have reported the preliminary flocculation potential of this material under fixed or single-variable experimental conditions [15,16]. However, most previous studies have not addressed comprehensive multivariate optimization, and only a limited number have evaluated its combined effectiveness in both microalgal biomass harvesting and nutrient removal.
In this context, the present study proposes a novel, integrated approach based on the two-level factorial design (2ᵏ with center points) to optimize the operational parameters for Chlorella spp. removal using eggshell-derived bioflocculants. Variables such as temperature, pH, flocculant dosage, and initial biomass concentration are statistically analyzed for their individual and interactive effects on removal efficiency.
Although previous studies have examined the use of eggshell-derived bioflocculants, many of them have relied on One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) experimental approaches [17]. While this methodology is suitable for preliminary screening, it does not allow the simultaneous evaluation of interactions among variables. In water treatment processes, system performance is typically controlled by multiple interdependent factors, including pH, temperature, biomass concentration, and flocculant dosage. Under such conditions, multivariate strategies become particularly valuable for identifying optimal operating conditions with greater experimental efficiency [18,19]. To overcome these limitations, the present study applies a factorial experimental design with center points, which enables systematic assessment of both main effects and interaction terms while reducing the total number of experimental runs. This approach supports robust prediction of removal performance while minimizing experimental workload.
Beyond the optimization of Chlorella spp. removal, this study also examines the broader bioremediation potential of the eggshell-derived bioflocculant by evaluating reductions in chemical oxygen demand (COD), nitrates, phosphates, and coliform bacteria. This integrated assessment provides a more comprehensive perspective on overall improvements in water quality. By combining principles of green chemistry, waste valorization, and statistically guided process optimization, the present work contributes to developing low-cost, environmentally responsible approaches to agricultural wastewater treatment, aligned with the objectives of the circular bioeconomy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Axenic Cultivation of Chlorella spp.

The Chlorella spp. used in this study were grown in agricultural wastewater to simulate conditions typically encountered in real-world applications. Surface water samples were collected from Laguna de San Pablo-Ibarra, located in northeastern Quito, Ecuador. The pure cultivation of Chlorella spp. was carried out in photobioreactors using a selective culture medium consisting of NaNO3 (25 g/L), MgSO4·7H2O (7.5 g/L), NaCl (2.5 g/L), and K2HPO4 (7.5 g/L). All reagents used in this medium were analytical grade and used without further purification. The medium was prepared by dissolving 10 mL of the solution in 1 L of sterile distilled water and sterilized by autoclaving at 121 °C.
Aeration was maintained at a constant flow rate of 4 vvm. Illumination was provided by a 6500 K LED light source operating at 120 V and 150 mA. The initial pH of the medium was adjusted to 6.8 and maintained under a room temperature of 18.5–20 °C. Growth was monitored for 15 days by measuring optical density (OD) at 688 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (OPTIZEN QX, Mecasys Co., Ltd., Daejeon, Republic of Korea). This wavelength lies within the characteristic absorption range of chlorophyll a (approximately 660–690 nm), the primary photosynthetic pigment in Chlorella spp., and is commonly employed for biomass estimation. Measurements in this spectral region provide a reliable proxy for cell concentration while minimizing interference from other cellular components [20].
A cell number was quantified using a Neubauer chamber (0.100 mm2–0.0025 mm2 grid area). Dilution factor (1:10) and counting across five squares per replicate. Cell density was calculated and expressed as cells mL−1 [19].

2.2. Wastewater Preparation

To simulate realistic wastewater conditions, organic chicken compost was selected as the nutrient source. The compost was initially sieved manually using a 1 mm mesh to remove coarse particles and improve sample homogeneity. Subsequently, 2 g of the sieved material were mixed with 600 mL of tap water and stirred at 300 rpm for 24 h to promote nutrient release. The resulting suspension was then filtered under vacuum through a 0.45 μm membrane to reduce the microbial load while preserving soluble nutrients. Thermal sterilization was intentionally avoided to prevent alterations to the natural composition of the organic matter [17].
A final solution was prepared by mixing 300 mL of the filtered compost extract with 300 mL of tap water, adjusting the pH to 3.5 using 0.5 mol/L HCl. Subsequently, 100 mL of the pre-cultivated Chlorella spp. Suspension was added to this solution to initiate growth under eutrophic conditions [20,21].

2.3. Eggshell Bioflocculant Preparation

Eggshells used in this study were collected from a single poultry farm to ensure consistency of the raw material. The shells were thoroughly washed with distilled water and subsequently dried at 102 °C for 60 min using a laboratory drying oven. After drying, the shells were manually crushed into a fine powder using a mortar and pestle. The resulting eggshell powder was stored in hermetically sealed vials at room temperature (18.5–20 °C) until further use.
To prepare the bioflocculant solutions, eggshell powder (100 mg, 55 mg, and 10 mg) was individually mixed with 10 mL of 0.5 mol L−1 hydrochloric acid and stirred continuously at 600 rpm for 30 min to promote dissolution of calcium carbonate from the eggshell matrix. The filtrates were then diluted to a final volume of 100 mL with distilled water, yielding bioflocculant solutions with final concentrations of 1000 mg L−1, 550 mg L−1, and 100 mg L−1, based on the initial mass of eggshell material used.

2.4. Flocculation-Sedimentation Assay

The flocculation experiments were conducted in 250 mL beakers containing 100 mL of the Chlorella spp. suspension, to which 9 mL of the eggshell-derived bioflocculant solution was added. The mixture was gently stirred manually for 1 min to initiate flocculation and ensure preliminary dispersion. Subsequently, the suspension pH was adjusted to the target range of 8.5–10.0 using 0.5 mol L−1 NaOH and verified with a calibrated pH meter.
Flocculation tests were then performed using a digital jar-test apparatus (SF4 Digital Flocculator, MTOPS). The stirring corresponded to the lowest operating temperature range (50 rpm). This low-speed agitation was intentionally selected to promote homogeneous dispersion and prevent shear forces that could disrupt floc formation.
To ensure that the system remained within biologically tolerable conditions, pH was measured before and after adding the eggshell-derived bioflocculant. Measurements were obtained for each biomass level tested (Initial optical density (OD688) values of 2.0 and 3.0) at the three target pH levels of 8.5, 9.5, and 10.0. The initial pH adjustment was carried out prior to the flocculation step using 0.5 mol L−1 NaOH, and final pH values were recorded after 360 min of sedimentation with a calibrated digital pH meter to ±0.01.
The flocculation contact time was fixed at 360 min based on preliminary experiments showing that this duration yielded consistent, reproducible sedimentation of Chlorella spp. biomass. Shorter contact times led to incomplete floc formation, whereas longer settling periods did not yield further improvements in sedimentation performance. The selected time frame is consistent with previous studies on bioflocculants derived from natural materials for microalgal harvesting, which reported that settling periods of 4 to 6 h enhance sedimentation efficiency and ensure effective clarification [21].
Shorter contact times resulted in incomplete floc formation, whereas longer settling periods did not produce further improvements in sedimentation performance. The selected time frame is in agreement with previous studies on bioflocculants derived from natural materials for microalgal harvesting, which have reported that settling periods ranging from 4 to 6 h enhance sedimentation efficiency and ensure effective clarification [20].
The system was observed at 60-min intervals to record changes in optical density (OD) using the OPTIZEN UV/VIS QX spectrophotometer. The removal efficiency was calculated by comparing the initial and final OD measurements of the treated samples. The removal efficiency of Chlorella spp. was calculated using the following Equation (2):
R e m o v a l   r a t e ( % ) = O D 688 n m ( t 0 ) O D 688 n m ( t i ) O D 688 n m ( t 0 ) × 100
where O D 688 n m ( t 0 ) is the optical density of the sample measured at time 0, and O D 688 n m ( t ) is the optical density of the sample recorded at time t. A graph of optical density vs. time was presented for each of the experiments [20].
The selected flocculant concentrations of 100, 550, and 1000 mg L−1 were determined based on preliminary experiments and values reported in the literature for calcium-based or shell-derived bioflocculants. The lowest concentration tested (100 mg L−1) represents the minimum effective dose, whereas the highest concentration (1000 mg L−1) approaches saturation conditions. An intermediate level of 550 mg L−1 was included to examine potential non-linear responses and to support optimization of material usage. Together, these concentration levels allow evaluation of removal efficiency across a broad operational range.

2.5. Design of Experiment (DOE) and Statistical Analysis

A non-replicated two-level factorial experimental design (2k) with center points was employed to evaluate the influence of four key variables: temperature (A), pH (B), bioflocculant concentration (C), and the optical density (OD) of the Chlorella spp. suspension (D). This design enabled the systematic assessment of both main effects and interaction terms while minimizing the total number of experimental runs. Each factor was examined at low (−1) and high (+1) levels, with additional center points (0) included to detect potential curvature in the response surface (Table 1).
The design of experiments (DOE) framework was applied to optimize the flocculation process by maximizing Chlorella spp. removal efficiency while reducing experimental effort and cost. The experimental design followed the methodology described by Montgomery for non-replicated factorial experiments, incorporating center points to estimate experimental error and detect curvature in the response surface. This approach enables efficient screening of significant factors while reducing the number of experimental runs required [22].
Statistical analyses, including analysis of variance (ANOVA), regression modeling, and significance testing, were conducted using Design-Expert® software (version 13). Model adequacy and reliability were evaluated based on the coefficient of determination (R2), adjusted R2, and predicted R2 (PRESS), confirming the suitability of the proposed model. Statistical significance was evaluated at a 95% confidence level (p < 0.05).
The experimental ranges were selected based on literature reports and environmental relevance. Acid conditions were not considered because they are known to reduce microalgal removal efficiency, whereas alkaline conditions favor charge neutralization and particle aggregation [12,21].
Experimental variability of the model was estimated from the residual error; the central points were incorporated to assess variability and potential curvature in the response, rather than to obtain an independent estimate of pure experimental error. Achieving the exact target temperature, pH, and initial optical density under laboratory conditions is constrained by instrumental precision and environmental fluctuations; therefore, experiments were conducted at the closest attainable setpoints. The resulting deviations were kept within a controlled, measurable range and are reflected in the model residuals. Consequently, factors related to variability are implicitly captured within the error term without compromising the reliability of the statistical analysis. Statistical evaluation was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA).

2.6. Water Quality Characterization After Bioflocculant Exposure

The quality of the treated wastewater was evaluated by measuring nitrate, phosphate, chemical oxygen demand (COD), and coliform bacteria. These parameters were selected to assess the broader environmental performance of the bioflocculation process. Nitrate concentrations were determined using the HACH NitraVer®5 reagent method (cadmium reduction method) with a detection range of 0–30 mg L−1, while phosphate concentrations were measured using the HACH PhosVer® 3 reagent method (ascorbic acid method), with a detection range of 0–2.5 mg L−1. Both nutrients were analyzed with an OPTIZEN UV/VIS QX spectrophotometer. COD was quantified using the high-range DR/2010 method, which covers a concentration range of 0–1500 mg L−1, at a wavelength of 620 nm [23].
Coliform bacteria were detected using MacConkey agar as the culture medium. Samples were incubated under controlled laboratory conditions. After incubation, bacterial counts were quantified using the colony-forming unit (CFU) method following standard microbiological procedures for water quality analysis [24].

3. Results

3.1. Chlorella spp. Growth and pH Behavior During Cultivation in Wastewater

The cultivation of Chlorella spp. in photobioreactors (PBRs) using nutrient-enriched chicken compost wastewater resulted in a gradual increase in optical density (OD) over the cultivation period. The microalgal culture reached the exponential growth phase after 9–10 days of cultivation under experimental conditions. At this stage, the biomass concentration reached an optical density (OD) of 2.0 ± 0.2, equivalent to 3.76 × 107 cells mL−1. By day 15, the system stabilized at an OD of 3.0 ± 0.1, corresponding to a cell density of 5.93 × 107 cells mL−1, which was subsequently used to define the inoculum conditions for the flocculation experiments (Figure 1). The linear relationship between optical density and cell concentration enabled monitoring of microalgal proliferation under wastewater cultivation conditions.
These growth profiles confirm that compost-derived wastewater provides a nutrient-rich environment that sustains high-density microalgal growth, effectively reproducing the eutrophic conditions commonly observed in agricultural effluent.

3.2. Model Fitting and Statistical Significance

Table 2 presents the experimental matrix of the two-level factorial design with center points, and the corresponding removal rate of Chlorella spp. The table summarizes all experimental runs performed in this study, allowing direct comparison between operating conditions and observed responses. Central point replicates were included to evaluate experimental reproducibility and assess potential curvature in the response.
The experimental results obtained from the factorial design are summarized in Table 3 and Table 4.
Statistical analysis through ANOVA and regression modeling demonstrated strong model performance, with a high coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.97), indicating that the selected factors and their interactions adequately explain the variability in removal efficiency.
The Shapiro–Wilk test confirmed the normality of the residuals, while the lack-of-fit test was not statistically significant (F = 5.60, p = 0.0929), supporting the adequacy of the linear model. Moreover, the curvature term was not significant (F = 1.10, p = 0.3207), suggesting that the system response is linear within the tested experimental domain and that no higher-order polynomial terms are required.
In addition to the main effects, several interaction terms were statistically significant, indicating synergistic relationships among the variables evaluated. In particular, the interaction between temperature and pH (AB) showed a strong effect on the response (F = 34.60, p = 0.0002). Significant interactions were also observed for temperature and Initial optical density (OD688) (AD) and (BC), as well as for the three-factor interaction involving temperature, flocculant concentration, and Initial optical density (OD688) (ACD). These findings highlight the multivariate nature of the flocculation process and underscore the importance of considering the combined effects of parameters when optimizing treatment conditions.
This behavior is further illustrated by the Pareto chart of standardized effects (Figure 2), which confirms the dominant influence of temperature and Initial optical density (OD688) on removal efficiency. Among the interaction terms, temperature–Initial optical density (OD688) (AD) and temperature–pH (AB) ranked among the most influential, supporting their relevance and retention in the regression model. In contrast, the four-factor interaction (ABCD) was not statistically significant, indicating that including higher-order interactions does not improve model performance.
In parallel, pH monitoring throughout the cultivation and flocculation stages revealed a high degree of stability. As summarized in Table 5, the adjusted pH values remained essentially constant throughout the experiment, with variations of less than ±0.1 pH units in most cases. This behavior indicates the system’s effective buffering capacity and supports the operational robustness of the selected treatment conditions.
The ANOVA results indicate that temperature was the most influential factor affecting removal efficiency (F = 102.95, p < 0.0001). In contrast, flocculant concentration and initial optical density did not exhibit statistically significant individual effects within the evaluated experimental range (p > 0.05). However, several interaction terms involving these variables were statistically significant, indicating that their influence on flocculation performance occurs primarily through combined effects rather than isolated contributions.
Overall, these results confirm the statistical robustness and predictive capability of the reduced model and demonstrate the effectiveness of the factorial design in identifying the most relevant operational parameters for practical wastewater treatment applications. The final regression model, expressed in coded variables, is presented in Equation (3).
Y = 0.7151 − 0.0815A − 0.0199B − 0.0473AB + 0.0545AD − 0.0246BC + 0.0261CD − 0.0448ACD − 0.0349BCD
where:
  • A = Temperature
  • B = pH
  • C = Flocculant concentration
  • D = Initial optical density (OD688)
  • Y = Removal rate
The statistical results are further supported by the response surface analysis shown in Figure 3, which describes the combined effect of temperature (A) and pH (B) on the removal efficiency of Chlorella spp. Both the contour and three-dimensional surface plots indicate that removal efficiency is favored at lower temperatures and higher pH values, confirming a synergistic interaction between these two operational variables. At low temperatures, changes in pH had a clear effect on flocculation performance, with higher pH values leading to improved removal efficiency. This behavior indicates that alkaline conditions favor microalgal destabilization, most likely by reducing surface charge and promoting calcium-related precipitation processes. In contrast, as temperature increased, removal efficiency gradually decreased, suggesting that higher thermal conditions negatively affect floc formation. These results emphasize the need to carefully control temperature to maintain stable and effective flocculation.
To further examine higher-order interactions, Figure 3 also presents cube plots illustrating three-factor effects on biomass removal. When temperature (A) is fixed at its low level (−1), the combined influence of pH (B), bioflocculant concentration (C), and initial optical density (OD688) (D) results in the highest removal efficiency (0.94), indicating a strong cooperative effect under mild thermal conditions. In contrast, when pH (B) is maintained at a high level (+1), the maximum removal efficiency decreases to approximately 0.78, even under comparable settings for the remaining variables. This behavior highlights the context-dependent nature of multivariate interactions and demonstrates that optimal performance arises from balanced parameter combinations rather than isolated adjustments to individual factors. Overall, the combined response surface and cube plot analyses provide clear visual support for the model’s predictive reliability and its applicability to optimizing biomass recovery under realistic wastewater treatment conditions.

3.3. Optimization of Bioflocculant Dosage and Flocculation Conditions

Maximum removal efficiency (94%) was obtained at a temperature of 18.5 °C, pH 10, a bioflocculant concentration of 100 mg L−1, and an initial sample optical density of 2.0 ± 0.2, corresponding to an estimated biomass of 3.76 × 107 cells mL−1. Under these conditions, flocculation was efficient and reproducible, defining the optimal operating window for biomass removal.
When biomass concentration increased, a higher bioflocculant dosage (1000 mg L−1) was necessary to achieve comparable removal efficiencies. In contrast, the intermediate concentration tested (550 mg L−1) did not yield statistically significant improvements, indicating non-linear dose–response behavior and suggesting a practical upper limit for efficient material use (Figure 4).
Under most effective parameters, the system showed rapid clarification and effective biomass aggregation. This behavior is consistent with calcium-ion-driven charge destabilization and is enhanced under alkaline conditions, which facilitate surface charge reduction on microalgal cells.

3.4. Visual and Analytical Confirmation of Flocculation

Under the highest removal efficiency observed (18.5 °C, pH 10, and 100 mg L−1 of bioflocculant), a clear decrease in optical density was observed, accompanied by visible sedimentation of the microalgal biomass. As shown in Figure 5, the control corresponds to the untreated culture (OD = 2.0 ± 0.2; 3.76 × 107 cells mL−1), whereas the final state represents the suspension after 360 min of settling. The noticeable reduction in turbidity and the formation of compact flocs indicate that the eggshell-derived bioflocculant effectively promoted biomass aggregation and sedimentation under these conditions.

3.5. Contaminant Removal and Water Quality Enhancement

Water quality analysis of the treated samples showed clear reductions in several key contaminants under the optimized conditions (100 mg L−1 bioflocculant, pH 10, Initial optical density (OD688) 2.0 ± 0.2). Nitrate concentration decreased from 398.01 to 50.3 mg L−1, phosphate from 5.12 to 4.1 mg L−1, COD from 1041 to 231 mg L−1, and coliform counts from 7.80 × 105 to 2.56 × 105 CFU mL−1, as summarized in Table 6. These results indicate that the flocculation process contributed not only to biomass removal but also to an overall improvement in water quality (Figure 6). A detailed interpretation of these trends, together with a visual assessment of treated samples, is provided in the following section.

4. Discussion

The flocculation behavior observed in this study results from the combined effects of surface charge interactions and calcium-mediated aggregation, which are strongly influenced by pH, temperature, and biomass concentration. The eggshell-derived bioflocculant, mainly composed of calcium carbonate with minor organic components, acted as an effective destabilizing agent for Chlorella spp. Suspensions, promoting aggregation and subsequent sedimentation under suitable operating conditions. Similar behavior has been reported for calcium-rich bioflocculants derived from shell waste, where divalent ions play a central role in microalga destabilization and aggregation processes [25].
At lower pH values, algal surface groups remain largely protonated, while calcium species are more readily released from the eggshell matrix. As the system shifts toward alkaline conditions, deprotonation of functional groups on the algal surface, including carboxyl and phosphate moieties, reduces electrostatic repulsion between cells. Under these conditions, the available calcium ions interact with negatively charged sites on the cell surface, favoring aggregation through charge neutralization and ionic bridging. This combination of effects explains the improved floc formation and settling performance observed at higher pH values [11,19,25]. Comparable observations have been reported in studies on bioflocculant of Chlorella vulgaris, where alkaline conditions enhanced aggregation efficiency due to increased ionic bridging between algal cells and flocculant polymers [20].
These physicochemical mechanisms are supported by both experimental measurements and direct visual observations. Under the optimized conditions tested (18.5 °C, 100 mg L−1 bioflocculant, pH 10), dense microalgal aggregates formed and settled rapidly, producing visibly clarified supernatants. As shown in Figure 6, the untreated control maintained a turbid green appearance, whereas the treated sample exhibited a marked reduction in suspended solids and pigments. Similar rapid settling behavior has been documented for calcium-based bioflocculants applied to microalgal harvesting, where the formation of dense aggregates significantly enhances biomass recovery efficiency [25].
These visual changes are consistent with the quantitative results. As presented in Figure 6, treatment at pH 10 achieved the highest removal efficiencies among the conditions evaluated, including an 87% reduction in nitrate concentration, a 78% decrease in COD, and an almost complete removal of coliform bacteria (approximately 99.6%). Together, these outcomes indicate that the eggshell-derived material functions not only as a biomass flocculant but also contributes to the reduction in dissolved nutrients and microbial load. Comparable reductions in nutrient concentration have been reported in wastewater treatment studies involving microalgae flocculation, where the simultaneous removal of biomass and associated contaminants is attributed to the adsorption and cosettling of dissolved compounds within the formed flocs.
The reduction In coliform bacteria observed under the highest biomass removal treatment may be explained by the coagulation-flocculation mechanism promoted by the eggshell-derived bioflocculant. During floc formation, microbial cells can become entrapped within the aggregated particles and subsequently removed from the water column through sedimentation. In addition, bacterial cells may adsorb onto the surface of the flocs, which further facilitates their removal during settling. The experiments were conducted at ambient temperature (~18.5 °C), which corresponds to the natural laboratory conditions rather than a controlled thermal treatment. Therefore, the observed decrease in coliforms is primarily attributed to physical removal via flocculation and settling, despite the relatively high nutrient load in the wastewater. Temperature was identified as a relevant factor influencing flocculation performance. At higher temperatures (34.3–50 °C), a noticeable decline in removal efficiency was observed, suggesting that thermal conditions can compromise the stability of the flocculant system. This behavior may be associated with temperature-induced changes in the structure of organic components or in the solubility and availability of ionic species within the eggshell-derived matrix. Comparable trends have been reported for polymer-based flocculants, in which elevated temperatures reduce the intermolecular interactions required for the formation and maintenance of stable floc [5,26].
From a methodological perspective, the optimization strategy adopted in this study differs from the traditional one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) approaches commonly used in flocculation studies. Instead, a factorial experimental design with central points was employed to evaluate the combined effects of the main operation variables. This approach enables the identification of interaction effects and improves the robustness of the optimization process. Similar design of experiment strategies have been successfully applied in microalgal flocculation studies, including the shell waste bioflocculation for biodiesel-related biomass harvesting, highlighting the scientific validity of multivariate experimental designs in the development of efficient bioflocculation processes [20].
The statistical evaluation confirms the robustness of the proposed model. Analysis of variance yielded a high coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.97), while the lack-of-fit test was not statistically significant, indicating that the linear model adequately describes the system response. This conclusion is reinforced by the diagnostic plots, including the normal probability plot of residuals, residuals versus predicted values, and residuals versus run order (Figure 7). In all cases, residuals exhibited an approximately normal distribution, were randomly dispersed around zero, and showed no systematic patterns related to factor levels.
From a wider position, the integration of eggshell-derived bioflocculants with a controlled experimental design provides a practical framework for the development of low-cost wastewater treatment solutions. In addition to effective microalgal removal, the process achieved substantial reductions in nutrient concentrations and microbial indicators, highlighting its potential as a multifunctional and biofriendly treatment strategy.

5. Conclusions

This study shows that an eggshell-derived bioflocculant can effectively remove Chlorella spp. and associated contaminants from agricultural wastewater when operating conditions are optimized. Using a factorial design, maximum removal performance was obtained at pH 10, 18.5 °C, a bioflocculant dosage of 100 mg L−1, and an initial algal density of approximately 3.76 × 107 cells mL−1, achieving a maximum biomass removal efficiency of 094. This set of operational parameters was essential to maximize flocculation performance and demonstrates the process’s potential as a strategy for mitigating nutrient, organic, and microbial contamination in agricultural wastewater.
In addition to biomass harvesting, the process led to notable reductions in nitrates (87%), COD (78%), phosphates (21%), and coliform bacteria (99.6%), indicating that the eggshell-based material contributes simultaneously to solid removal and water quality improvement. These results highlight the practical value of calcium carbonate-rich waste as a multifunctional treatment agent within a single flocculation step.
Future work should further characterize the material by quantifying calcium release at different dosage levels, for example, using complexometric titration with EDTA or ICP-OES. Such characterization would support improved process control and dosage selection under applied conditions. Also, it could include determining the zeta potential and point of zero charge of the bioflocculant to further elucidate electrostatic interactions. Overall, the findings support the potential of eggshell-derived bioflocculants as a low-cost and resource-efficient option for wastewater treatment systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.G.; methodology, K.G.; software, K.G.; validation, K.G. and M.Q.; formal analysis, K.G. and M.Q.; investigation, K.G., A.I. and M.Q.; resources, A.I.; data curation, K.G.; writing—original draft preparation, K.G.; writing and review and editing, K.G. and M.Q.; visualization, K.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors. The data are not publicly available due to their use in an ongoing research project.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Instituto Superior Sucre, a public higher education institution, for providing the facilities and infrastructure where the experimental work was carried out. Special thanks are given to Alexandra Erazo for her support and assistance with the use of laboratory facilities, and to Rocío Chamba for her valuable help with laboratory analyses and data handling during the experimental phase. During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used OpenAI (GPT-4 model) for language refinement and clarity improvement. The authors reviewed and edited the generated content and take full responsibility for the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
DOEDesign of the experiments
ODOptical density
CODChemical oxygen demand
PBRsPhotobioreactors

References

  1. Narayanan, M.; Prabhakaran, M.; Natarajan, D.; Kandasamy, S.; Raja, R.; Carvalho, I.S.; Ashokkumar, V.; Chinnathambi, A.; Alharbi, S.A.; Devarayan, K.; et al. Phycoremediation Potential of Chlorella Sp. on the Polluted Thirumanimutharu River Water. Chemosphere 2021, 277, 130246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Tao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, A.; Li, T.; Sang, M.; Zhang, C. Freshwater Microalgae Harvested via Flocculation Induced by pH Decrease. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2013, 6, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chen, E.S.; Bridgeman, T.B. The Reduction of Chlorella Vulgaris Concentrations through UV-C Radiation Treatments: A Nature-Based Solution (NBS). Environ. Res. 2017, 156, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rabalais, N.N.; Turner, R.E. Management Case Study. In Treatise on Estuarine and Coastal Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 77–101. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tanvir, R.U.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, J. Cyanobacterial Community Succession and Associated Cyanotoxin Production in Hypereutrophic and Eutrophic Freshwaters. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 290, 118056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tang, C.-C.; Tian, Y.; Liang, H.; Zuo, W.; Wang, Z.-W.; Zhang, J.; He, Z.-W. Enhanced Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal from Domestic Wastewater via Algae-Assisted Sequencing Batch Biofilm Reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 250, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, F.; Zhou, C.; Li, G.; Peng, F. Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Glyphosate Adsorption on Resin D301. Arab. J. Chem. 2016, 9, S1665–S1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, S.; Ahn, C.H.; Kim, E.J.; Park, J.R.; Joo, J.C. Growth Inhibition of Harmful Algae Using TiO2-Embedded Expanded Polystyrene Balls in the Hypereutrophic Stream. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 398, 123172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Renault, F.; Sancey, B.; Badot, P.-M.; Crini, G. Chitosan for Coagulation/Flocculation Processes—An Eco-Friendly Approach. Eur. Polym. J. 2009, 45, 1337–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Laopaiboon, P.; Thani, A.; Leelavatcharamas, V.; Laopaiboon, L. Acid Hydrolysis of Sugarcane Bagasse for Lactic Acid Production. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 1036–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Salehizadeh, H.; Shojaosadati, S.A. Extracellular Biopolymeric Flocculants. Biotechnol. Adv. 2001, 19, 371–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kothari, R.; Pathak, V.V.; Pandey, A.; Ahmad, S.; Srivastava, C.; Tyagi, V.V. A Novel Method to Harvest Chlorella Sp. via Low Cost Bioflocculant: Influence of Temperature with Kinetic and Thermodynamic Functions. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 225, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Choi, H.J. Effect of Eggshells for the Harvesting of Microalgae Species. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2015, 29, 666–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pandey, A.; Pathak, V.V.; Kothari, R.; Black, P.N.; Tyagi, V.V. Experimental Studies on Zeta Potential of Flocculants for Harvesting of Algae. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 231, 562–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Puspitasari, P.; Yuwanda, V.; Sukarni; Dika, J.W. The Properties of Eggshell Powders with the Variation of Sintering Duration. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 515, 012104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rosnah, R.; Taslim, N.A.; Aman, A.M.; Idris, I.; As’ad, S.; Bukhari, A.; Wahyudin, E. Physicochemical Characteristics of Chicken Eggshell Flour Produced by Hydrochloric Acid and Acetic Acid Extraction. Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 9, 428–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Speight, J.G. Industrial Inorganic Chemistry. In Environmental Inorganic Chemistry for Engineers; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 111–169. [Google Scholar]
  18. Guzmán, K.; Kumar, B.; Grijalva, M.; Debut, A.; Cumbal, L. Ascorbic Acid-Assisted Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles: pH and Stability Study. In Green Chemistry—New Perspectives; Kumar, B., Debut, A., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  19. Guzmán, K.; Kumar, B.; Vallejo, M.J.; Grijalva, M.; Debut, A.; Cumbal, L. Ultrasound-Assisted Synthesis and Antibacterial Activity of Gallic Acid-Chitosan Modified Silver Nanoparticles. Prog. Org. Coat. 2019, 129, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Suparmaniam, U.; Lam, M.K.; Uemura, Y.; Shuit, S.H.; Lim, J.W.; Show, P.L.; Lee, K.T.; Matsumura, Y.; Le, P.T.K. Flocculation of Chlorella Vulgaris by Shell Waste-Derived Bioflocculants for Biodiesel Production: Process Optimization, Characterization and Kinetic Studies. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 702, 134995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Rodríguez, K.; Araujo, M. Temperature and Pressure Effects on Zeta Potential Values of Reservoir Minerals. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2006, 300, 788–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Montgomery, D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 10th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hach Company. Water Analysis Handbook, 7th ed.; Hach Company: Loveland, CO, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  24. APHA; AWWA; WEF. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 23rd ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  25. Vandamme, D.; Foubert, I.; Muylaert, K. Flocculation as a Low-Cost Method for Harvesting Microalgae for Bulk Biomass Production. Trends Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Abalde, J.; Cid, A.; Fidalgo, J.; Torros, E.; Herrero, C. Microalgas: Cultivo y Aplicaciones; Universidade, Servizo de Publicacións: A Coruña, Spain, 1995; 334p. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Calibration curve of Chlorella spp. at 688 nm used for biomass quantification during the growth phase.
Figure 1. Calibration curve of Chlorella spp. at 688 nm used for biomass quantification during the growth phase.
Water 18 01311 g001
Figure 2. The standardized effects of main and interaction terms on the removal rate, with temperature and Initial optical density (OD688) exhibiting the strongest influence.
Figure 2. The standardized effects of main and interaction terms on the removal rate, with temperature and Initial optical density (OD688) exhibiting the strongest influence.
Water 18 01311 g002
Figure 3. (a) Contour and response surface plots showing the interactive effect of temperature (A) and pH (B) on the removal efficiency of Chlorella spp. The plots reveal a synergistic interaction where lower temperatures combined with higher pH levels enhance removal rates, supporting the influence of alkaline destabilization mechanisms in bioflocculation. (b) Cube plots illustrating third-order interaction effects on biomass removal: (a) interaction between pH (B), flocculant concentration (C), and Initial optical density (OD688) (D) at low temperature (A = −1); (b) interaction between temperature (A), flocculant concentration (C), and Initial optical density (OD688) (D) at high pH (B = +1). Plot (a) demonstrates higher removal efficiency under mild conditions, whereas plot (b) shows reduced effectiveness at elevated pH, highlighting context-dependent interactions among variables.
Figure 3. (a) Contour and response surface plots showing the interactive effect of temperature (A) and pH (B) on the removal efficiency of Chlorella spp. The plots reveal a synergistic interaction where lower temperatures combined with higher pH levels enhance removal rates, supporting the influence of alkaline destabilization mechanisms in bioflocculation. (b) Cube plots illustrating third-order interaction effects on biomass removal: (a) interaction between pH (B), flocculant concentration (C), and Initial optical density (OD688) (D) at low temperature (A = −1); (b) interaction between temperature (A), flocculant concentration (C), and Initial optical density (OD688) (D) at high pH (B = +1). Plot (a) demonstrates higher removal efficiency under mild conditions, whereas plot (b) shows reduced effectiveness at elevated pH, highlighting context-dependent interactions among variables.
Water 18 01311 g003
Figure 4. Response optimization plot showing the combination of temperature, pH, bioflocculant dosage, and biomass concentration that maximizes removal efficiency. Most effective parameters for removal were observed at low temperature (18.5 °C), high pH (10), and a bioflocculant concentration of 100 mg L−1, in agreement with the best-performing region predicted by the factorial model.
Figure 4. Response optimization plot showing the combination of temperature, pH, bioflocculant dosage, and biomass concentration that maximizes removal efficiency. Most effective parameters for removal were observed at low temperature (18.5 °C), high pH (10), and a bioflocculant concentration of 100 mg L−1, in agreement with the best-performing region predicted by the factorial model.
Water 18 01311 g004
Figure 5. Flocculation kinetics of Chlorella spp. At different pH values during a 360 min sedimentation period. The decrease in optical density (OD = 2.0 ± 0.2; 3.76 × 107 cells mL−1) over time illustrates the influence of pH on sedimentation rate and biomass aggregation. Faster and more stable clarification was observed at pH 10.
Figure 5. Flocculation kinetics of Chlorella spp. At different pH values during a 360 min sedimentation period. The decrease in optical density (OD = 2.0 ± 0.2; 3.76 × 107 cells mL−1) over time illustrates the influence of pH on sedimentation rate and biomass aggregation. Faster and more stable clarification was observed at pH 10.
Water 18 01311 g005
Figure 6. Relative concentration (%) of contaminants remaining after flocculation under three conditions: untreated control, pH 8, and pH 10 (100 mg L−1 eggshell-derived bioflocculant at 18.5 °C). (a) nitrates, (b) phosphates, (c) chemical oxygen demand (COD), and (d) coliform bacteria. The pH 10 condition showed the highest removal across all parameters.
Figure 6. Relative concentration (%) of contaminants remaining after flocculation under three conditions: untreated control, pH 8, and pH 10 (100 mg L−1 eggshell-derived bioflocculant at 18.5 °C). (a) nitrates, (b) phosphates, (c) chemical oxygen demand (COD), and (d) coliform bacteria. The pH 10 condition showed the highest removal across all parameters.
Water 18 01311 g006
Figure 7. Diagnostic plots for validation of the ANOVA model assumptions: (a) normal probability plot of residuals, confirming normal distribution; (b) residuals vs. predicted values, indicating homoscedasticity and absence of curvature; and (c) residuals vs. run order, verifying independence and lack of systematic trends. These plots collectively support the adequacy and robustness of the linear model used to describe flocculation performance.
Figure 7. Diagnostic plots for validation of the ANOVA model assumptions: (a) normal probability plot of residuals, confirming normal distribution; (b) residuals vs. predicted values, indicating homoscedasticity and absence of curvature; and (c) residuals vs. run order, verifying independence and lack of systematic trends. These plots collectively support the adequacy and robustness of the linear model used to describe flocculation performance.
Water 18 01311 g007
Table 1. Variables and levels considered in the Design of Experiments.
Table 1. Variables and levels considered in the Design of Experiments.
Independent VariablesFactor Level
−10+1
Temperature (A)18.5 °C34.3 °C50 °C
pH of the system (B)8.59.510.5
Flocculant concentration (C)100 ppm550 ppm1000 ppm
Initial Optical density (D)22.53
Table 2. Coded levels of the factors used in the experimental design.
Table 2. Coded levels of the factors used in the experimental design.
ABCDY
STDRunTemperaturepH of the SystemBioflocculant Conc.Initial ODRemoval Rate
18100000.733
92−1−1−110.600
153−11110.763
1041−1−110.677
135−1−1110.821
116−11−110.764
17700000.734
281−1−1−10.683
39−11−1−10.940
161011110.563
191100000.754
812111−10.556
713−111−10.783
41411−1−10.434
6151−11−10.664
516−1−11−10.756
117−1−1−1−10.900
14181−1110.780
201900000.715
122011−110.713
Table 3. ANOVA for the full factorial model.
Table 3. ANOVA for the full factorial model.
SourceSum of SquaresdfMean SquareF-Valuep-Value
Model0.2799150.018739.240.0014
A—Temperature0.106310.1063223.50.0001
B—pH0.006310.006313.290.0219
C—Flocculant concentration0.000310.00040.6440.4672
D—Initial optical density (OD688)0.000410.00040.88380.4004
AB0.035710.035775.120.0010
AC0.002110.00214.450.1025
AD0.047510.047599.940.0006
BC0.009710.009720.40.0107
BD0.001810.00183.80.1231
CD0.010910.010922.970.0087
ABC0.001810.00183.710.1264
ABD0.002110.00214.450.1025
ACD0.032010.032067.380.0012
BCD0.019510.019540.920.0031
ABCD0.003410.00347.070.0564
Residual0.001940.0005--
Lack of Fit0.001110.00114.490.1243
Pure Error0.000830.0003--
Total0.281819---
Table 4. ANOVA for the reduced model (significant terms).
Table 4. ANOVA for the reduced model (significant terms).
SourceSum of SquaresdfMean SquareF-Valuep-Value
Model0.271390.030129.2-
A—Temperature0.106310.1063102.95-
B—pH0.006310.00636.120.0353
AB0.035710.035734.60.0002
AD0.047510.047546.04-
BC0.009710.00979.40.0134
CD0.010910.010910.580.0100
ACD0.032010.032031.040.0003
BCD0.019510.019518.850.0019
ABCD0.003410.00343.260.1045
Curvature0.001110.00111.100.3207
Residual0.009390.0010--
Lack of Fit0.008560.00145.600.0929
Pure Error0.000830.0003--
Total0.281819---
Table 5. pH variation before and after flocculant addition for different target pH values.
Table 5. pH variation before and after flocculant addition for different target pH values.
Initial Optical Density (OD688) (OD)Initial pH (Raw Sample)Adjusted Target pHFinal pH After 360 minΔpH
2.0 ± 0.27.45 ± 0.028.58.51 ± 0.03+0.06
2.0 ± 0.27.45 ± 0.029.59.51 ± 0.04+0.06
2.0 ± 0.27.45 ± 0.0210.010.10 ± 0.02+0.10
3.0 ± 0.27.50 ± 0.028.58.52 ± 0.02+0.02
3.0 ± 0.27.50 ± 0.029.59.53 ± 0.03+0.03
Table 6. Comparison of Water Quality Parameters Before and After Bioflocculant Treatment (Positive Control vs. pH 8 and pH 10).
Table 6. Comparison of Water Quality Parameters Before and After Bioflocculant Treatment (Positive Control vs. pH 8 and pH 10).
ParameterpH ConditionInitial Value (Positive Control)Final Value (After Treatment)Absolute Reduction
Nitrate (mg/L)pH 8398.01 ± 2.1148.2 ± 3.4249.81
pH 10398.01 ± 2.150.3 ± 1.8347.71
Phosphate (mg/L)pH 85.12 ± 0.35.11 ± 0.020.01
pH 105.12 ± 0.34.10 ± 0.051.02
COD (mg/L)pH 81041 ± 15553 ± 12488
pH101041 ± 15231 ± 10810
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guzmán, K.; Izquierdo, A.; Quinga, M. Statistical Optimization of Eggshell-Derived Bioflocculants for the Harvesting of Chlorella spp. and Nutrient Mitigation in Agricultural Wastewater. Water 2026, 18, 1311. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18111311

AMA Style

Guzmán K, Izquierdo A, Quinga M. Statistical Optimization of Eggshell-Derived Bioflocculants for the Harvesting of Chlorella spp. and Nutrient Mitigation in Agricultural Wastewater. Water. 2026; 18(11):1311. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18111311

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guzmán, Katherine, Andrés Izquierdo, and Milton Quinga. 2026. "Statistical Optimization of Eggshell-Derived Bioflocculants for the Harvesting of Chlorella spp. and Nutrient Mitigation in Agricultural Wastewater" Water 18, no. 11: 1311. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18111311

APA Style

Guzmán, K., Izquierdo, A., & Quinga, M. (2026). Statistical Optimization of Eggshell-Derived Bioflocculants for the Harvesting of Chlorella spp. and Nutrient Mitigation in Agricultural Wastewater. Water, 18(11), 1311. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18111311

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop