Next Article in Journal
Mapping Groundwater Potential in Arid Regions: A Geographic Information System and Remote Sensing Approach for Sustainable Resource Management in Khamis Mushayt, Saudi Arabia
Previous Article in Journal
Water Environment Assessment of Xin’an River Basin in China Based on DPSIR and Entropy Weight–TOPSIS Models
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Satellite Retrieval and Spatiotemporal Variability in Chlorophyll-a for Marine Ranching: An Example from Daya Bay, Guangdong Province, China

1
School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
2
Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Water Environment Remote Sensing Monitoring, Guangzhou 510006, China
3
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519000, China
4
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Urbanization and Geo-Simulation, Guangzhou 510006, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2025, 17(6), 780; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17060780
Submission received: 27 January 2025 / Revised: 19 February 2025 / Accepted: 5 March 2025 / Published: 7 March 2025

Abstract

With the planning and construction of marine ranching in China, water quality has become one of the critical limiting factors for the development of marine ranching. Due to geographical differences, marine ranches exhibit varying water quality conditions under the influence of the continental shelf. To the best of our knowledge, there is limited research on satellite-based water quality monitoring for marine ranching and the spatiotemporal variations in marine ranches in different geographical locations. Chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) is a key indicator of the ecological health and disaster prevention capacity of marine ranching, as it reflects the conditions of eutrophication and is crucial for the high-quality, sustainable operation of marine ranching. Using a physically based model, this study focuses on the retrieval of Chl-a concentration in Daya Bay. The coefficient of determination (R2) between the model retrieval values and the in situ Chl-a data is 0.69, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.52 μg/L and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 44.25%. Seasonal variations in Chl-a concentration are observed in Daya Bay and are higher in spring–summer and lower in autumn–winter. In the YangMeikeng waters, Chl-a concentration shows a declining trend with the development of marine ranching. A comparison between the YangMeikeng (nearshore) and XiaoXingshan (offshore) marine ranches suggests that offshore ranching may be less impacted by terrestrial pollutants. The primary sources of Chl-a input in Daya Bay are the Dan’ao River and the aquaculture areas in the northeastern part of the bay. This study can provide valuable information for the protection and management of marine ranching.

1. Introduction

As the global population grows and economies develop, the demand for marine fishery products continues to rise. However, unsustainable fishing practices, such as overfishing and illegal fishing, have led to a significant decline in coastal marine fishery resources. Additionally, the continuous generation and discharge of terrestrial pollutants into the ocean have caused eutrophication in coastal waters, further degrading the marine ecological environment [1,2]. In this context, to promote the sustainable development of marine biological resources and the protection of the marine ecosystem, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) introduced the concept of the “Blue Growth Initiative” [3,4]. Guided by the concept, scientists have proposed the idea of marine ranching, referring to ecosystems constructed in suitable sea areas based on ecological principles, utilizing natural productivity, modern engineering technology, and management models through habitat restoration and artificial breeding [5]. They serve the dual purpose of environmental protection and resource conservation and the sustainable production of fisheries. Marine ranching facilitates coastal ecological restoration, restores fishery resources, and ensures continuous production, attracting global attention. In recent years, the Chinese government has also released the “National Marine Ranching Demonstration Zone Construction Plan (2017–2025)”, aiming to accelerate the development of marine ranching [6,7].
However, the dual functions of ecological restoration and fishery production in marine ranching are closely related to the water quality of the coastal region [8,9]. According to the “Specifications for the Management of National Marine ranching Demonstration Zones” promulgated by the Chinese government, seawater quality in a marine ranching site should comply with Class II seawater quality standards. In practice, water quality monitoring plays a crucial role in the planning stage and throughout the entire life-cycle, including the construction and operation stages. Specifically, during the construction stage, water quality information can be used to monitor the potential environmental impacts caused by construction activities [10,11] and serves as a critical indicator of the health of the marine ranch ecosystem, helping to predict and warn of ecological disasters such as red tides during the operation stage [12,13]. Therefore, monitoring water quality in marine ranch regions is of significant practical importance. However, based on our understanding, there is currently limited focus and research on this aspect.
Currently, water quality monitoring for marine ranching primarily relies on manual water sample collection and buoy monitoring stations [14]. Manual sampling requires significant labor and time costs, especially in extensive coastal regions, making it difficult to effectively capture changes in water quality [15]. Buoy monitoring requires substantial financial investment in equipment, and issues such as sensor fouling and sampler blockages make maintenance and repairs challenging, resulting in poor long-term operational reliability. As a result, traditional water quality monitoring methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive, unable to meet the needs for large-scale, stable, and continuous monitoring. Additionally, they are insufficient for reflecting the complete condition of large-scale marine ranching [16,17,18,19]. With its continuous development, satellite remote sensing technology has become an effective method for large-scale, continuous, real-time water quality inversion and monitoring [20,21,22,23]. Remote sensing offers advantages such as wide spatial coverage, broad spectral range, high timeliness, and high spatial and spectral resolution [24,25,26,27]. Compared to traditional monitoring technologies, remote sensing overcomes the limitations of high costs and low timeliness, providing large-scale, periodic water quality monitoring results for target coastal regions [28,29,30,31].
In water quality remote sensing monitoring, Chl-a is a crucial indicator of the ecological health and disaster resilience of marine ranching [32,33,34]. Influenced by terrestrial nutrients, seawater movement, and the metabolic activity of phytoplankton, changes in Chl-a reflect the eutrophication condition in marine ranching areas [35,36,37]. High Chl-a concentrations are often associated with harmful algal bloom events, which threaten the marine ranching ecosystem and cause significant economic losses. Therefore, Chl-a monitoring is essential for the high-quality and sustainable operation of marine ranching. Current research on Chl-a retrieval models primarily focuses on data-driven empirical and semi-empirical models. Zhang et al. established a statistical model based on a univariate quadratic equation using band-Ultra Blue and band-Blue of Landsat-8 to estimate Chl-a in the coral reef areas of the South China Sea [34]. In fact, machine learning models are also a type of statistical model. Cen et al. established a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network to estimate the Chl-a in the East China Sea [38]. While data-driven models demonstrate high accuracy in inversion regions, they often lack clear physical significance, which has been a point of contention. Additionally, in practical studies, the availability of water quality data in coastal areas is often limited, or there are information barriers, leading to the failure of data-driven models. Therefore, this study aims to establish a Chl-a retrieval model that has clear physical meaning and does not rely on large amounts of water quality data.
This study focuses on the marine ranching areas in Daya Bay, with the objectives of: (1) retrieving Chl-a in Daya Bay using a physically based model; (2) analyzing the spatiotemporal variability and seasonal patterns of Chl-a in Daya Bay; and (3) comparing Chl-a concentrations between YangMeikeng (nearshore marine ranching) and XiaoXingshan (offshore marine ranching) to better understand the spatial and temporal dynamics of marine ranching water quality in these distinct geographical environments.

2. Methodology

2.1. Study Area

Daya Bay is located between 114°30′ E and 114°50′ E, and 22°30′ N and 22°50′ N, in the northern part of the South China Sea. It is bordered by the Dapeng Peninsula in Longgang, Shenzhen (Dapeng New District, west coast), Tieluzhang in Huiyang, Huizhou (Aotou and Xiayong Streets, Daya Bay Economic and Technological Development Zone, north coast), and the Renping Peninsula in Huidong (east coast). To the east, it adjoins Honghai Bay, while to the west, it is adjacent to Dapeng Bay (as shown in Figure 1). Daya Bay is a typical subtropical, semi-enclosed bay and the northernmost bay in the South China Sea, extending furthest into the mainland. Covering an area of approximately 600 km2, it has a maximum depth of 21 m and an average depth of 11 m. The tidal currents are predominantly reciprocating, with stronger currents at the bay mouth compared to the bay head. The bay’s coastline is varied and rugged, consisting mainly of rocky, sandy, gravelly, muddy, and mangrove shores. This area is home to a rich diversity of large benthic organisms, contributing to its high biodiversity. The XiaoXingshan marine ranch has been designated as a national-level marine ranching demonstration zone, while the YangMeikeng sea areas have also been included in the national marine ranching demonstration zone plan. Geographically, the YangMeikeng marine ranch is closer to the continental shelf, while the XiaoXingshan marine ranch is closer to the open ocean. Thus, monitoring water quality in this region is essential for the successful development and management of marine ranching.

2.2. Data

Sentinel-2 is a high-resolution multispectral imaging satellite constellation launched by the European Space Agency (ESA) in 2015, comprising two satellites: Sentinel-2A and Sentinel-2B. These satellites are primarily used for land management, agriculture and forestry, disaster control, and risk mapping. They inherit the legacy of the SPOT and Landsat programs, providing high-quality data support for multispectral observations. Sentinel-2 is equipped with a multispectral imager (MSI) that covers 13 spectral bands, with an imaging swath width of 290 km and a revisit period of 5 days. Due to their high resolution, short revisit period, and multispectral imaging capabilities, Sentinel-2 data are widely used in various environmental and Geographic Information System (GIS) applications, such as land cover classification, agricultural monitoring, forest health assessment, and disaster response [39,40,41]. Its multispectral data not only enhance the ability to identify surface features but also improve the accuracy and timeliness of environmental change monitoring [42,43,44]. In terms of water quality monitoring, its high-resolution images aid in detecting suspended matter and algal distributions in water system, thereby supporting environmental protection and water resource management.
The validation data were obtained from nearshore seawater quality monitoring information publicly available from the Guangdong Provincial Department of Ecology and Environment (GPDEE), and the observational data were supplied by the South China Sea Institute of Oceanology (SCSIO), Chinese Academy of Sciences. Chl-a concentrations are continuously monitored in real time using fluorescence-based sensors mounted on buoys [45], and the measurements are made at a depth of 0.5 m. These water quality validation data are further used to perform accuracy assessments for validating the Chl-a concentration retrieval model introduced in Section 2.4. The Sentinel-2 images are matched with the buoy station’s geographical coordinates and date information, with a time window of ±3 days. A previous study suggested that a time window of ±3 days between satellite data acquisition and in situ measurements can effectively improve Chl-a retrieval accuracy [46].

2.3. Preprocessing of Satellite Data

In this study, atmospheric correction was performed using the ACOLITE algorithm. ACOLITE is a program developed by the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences (RBINS) specifically designed for processing satellite water imagery. It defaults to using dark spectrum fitting for its algorithm [47]. The main advantage of ACOLITE is its ability to quickly and directly process high-resolution satellite imagery for aquatic applications (coastal/oceanic and inland waters). The algorithm can be downloaded from http://github.com/acolite (accessed on 20 July 2024) and used with the ACOLITE GUI. Sun glint masks used Cox–Munk model and Cloud masks was conducted via a threshold-based extraction method. Water segmentation was performed using the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI). The specific image and processing flow are shown in Figure 2.

2.4. Physically Based Retrieval Model

In our previous study, a physical-based retrieval model based on unit inherent optical parameters was established [48], as shown in the Formula (1). By measuring unit inherent optical parameters and substituting the band values, the three unknown variable “Dc”, “Du”, and “Ds” can be solved. In this study, we utilizes four bands (RGB and NIR) from Sentinel-2 with a spatial resolution of 10 m to estimate Chl-a concentration (“Dc”). The unit inherent optical parameters were measured based on typical polluted water bodies within the study area, following the measurement methods outlined in our previous research [49,50]. All the unit inherent optical parameters of Daya Bay are shown in Table 1.
r r s = ( b w + b c     D c + b u     D u + b s     D s ) β Θ 4 ( sec θ W I O Z + sec θ W O O Z ) a w + b w + ( a c + b c ) D c + ( a u + b u ) D u + ( a s + b s ) D s
In Formula (1), “ r r s ” is the water-leaving reflectance, “ β Θ ” represents the scattering phase function, and “ θ W I O Z ” and “ θ W O O Z ” are the zenith angle of the incident light and the upwelling light beneath the water surface, respectively. “ a w ” and “ b w ”, “ a c ” and “ b c ”, “ a u ” and “ b u ”, and “ a s “ and “ b s ” represent the absorption and scattering coefficients of water, Chl-a, suspended sediment, and aerobic organic matter, respectively. “ D c ”, “ D u ”, and “ D s ” denote the concentration of Chl-a, suspended sediment, and aerobic organic matter, respectively.
Table 1. The unit inherent optical parameters of each component in seawater.
Table 1. The unit inherent optical parameters of each component in seawater.
Band 2Band 3Band 4Band 8
central wavelength (nm)490560665842
a (m-1)water0.01960.08440.42213.7938
Chl-a0.93100.63080.93940.5348
suspended sediment0.12020.04630.03210.1144
aerobic organic matter0.19610.14040.12930.1001
b (m-1)water0.00310.00170.00080.0003
Chl-a0.09060.17210.09050.1418
suspended sediment0.05230.05890.0529
aerobic organic matter0.00780.00980.0047

2.5. Accuracy Assessment

To evaluate the accuracy of the Chl-a inversion model for Daya Bay, three indicators were used: coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE).
The formula for calculating R2 is
R 2 = 1 y i f i 2 y i Y 2
where “ R 2 ” is the coefficient of determination, “ y i ” is Chl-a at the validation point, “ f i ” is the value retrieved from inversion model, and “ Y ” is the mean Chl-a at the validation points.
The formula for calculating RMSE is
R M S E = y i f i 2 n
where “ n ” is the sample size, “ y i ” is Chl-a at the validation point, and “ f i “ is the value retrieved from inversion model.
The formula for calculating MAPE is
M A P E = 1 n y i f i 100 %

2.6. Spatiotemporal Evolution Analysis

We conducted a spatiotemporal evolution analysis of Daya Bay from 2020 to 2024. For the intra-annual calculation of Chl-a, at least three years of monthly data are required to compute the monthly mean Chl-a concentration. For the interannual calculation of Chl-a, one image per quarter is selected, resulting in a total of four images, to calculate the annual mean.
Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) is a non-parametric statistical method that treats each raster cell as a point and utilizes a kernel function (such as the Gaussian kernel) to weight these points, generating a smooth probability density function. In this study, KDE is employed to effectively assess the spatial distribution characteristics of Chl-a in the Daya Bay region, identifying areas of high Chl-a concentration. To enhance computational efficiency, this study adopts bilinear interpolation to resample the original raster data to a resolution of 50 m.
To investigate interannual variation trends, the trend (also referred to as the rate of change) at each location within the study area was calculated and represented as the linear slope of the annual average Chl-a map, following the methodology used in many previous studies [51,52].

3. Results

3.1. Model Performance

The validation conducted using satellite-to-ground matching points shows that the Chl-a concentration estimated based on our model is in good agreement with the in situ data. The matching points generally lie along the 1:1 line (Figure 3), with a R2 of 0.69, a RMSE of 1.52 μg/L and a MAPE of 44.25%. All validation points are listed in Table 2, revealing that the model tends to exhibit relatively larger errors at lower Chl-a concentrations. This may be due to the influence of suspended sediments in the shortwave blue and green regions, which significantly affect the absorption and scattering properties of Chl-a in waters with lower Chl-a concentrations [53]. Moreover, aerobic organic matter absorbs light in the visible spectrum, particularly at shorter wavelengths, increasing water absorbance and reducing the intensity of Chl-a reflection signals. This interference becomes more pronounced in waters with lower Chl-a concentrations. Therefore, further research and refinement of the model are needed in the future.

3.2. Intra-Annual Spatiotemporal Distribution Pattern of Chl-a

Chl-a exhibits spatial variation across different regions of Daya Bay (Figure 4). Generally, higher Chl-a concentrations are observed at the bay head, while lower concentrations are found at the bay mouth. In the middle of the bay, nearshore areas show elevated Chl-a levels, particularly around river estuaries and land-adjacent regions. The results indicate that Chl-a exhibit an increasing trend followed by a subsequent decline over the course of the year. Moreover, the spatial distribution patterns of Chl-a in Daya Bay show significant differences between the spring–summer and autumn–winter seasons. In winter (January and February), Chl-a concentrations in Daya Bay are relatively low, with higher values observed only in nearshore areas. By March, Chl-a concentrations within the bay remain low, but a significant increase is observed at the interface between the bay and the coast. In May, Chl-a in coastal regions increases substantially. Despite the impact of cloud cover on image quality between June and August, it is still evident that the Chl-a concentration reaches its annual peak (Figure 4 Jun–Aug). From September to November, Chl-a gradually declines, reaching lower levels by December.

3.3. Interannual Variation Trend of Chl-a

Figure 5 illustrates the rate of change in Chl-a concentration over a five-year period (2020–2024). During this observation period, the southwestern coastal region of Daya Bay exhibited a significant decreasing trend in Chl-a concentration, which may be linked to ongoing environmental remediation efforts associated with the establishment and development of the YangMeikeng marine ranch. These efforts likely contributed to improvements in water quality and the reduction in nutrient loads in the region. In contrast, certain areas within the central bay experienced a marked increase in Chl-a concentrations, which may be attributed to the expansion of aquaculture zones. The growth of aquaculture activities in this region has the potential to increase nutrient input into the water, stimulating phytoplankton growth and consequently raising Chl-a levels. This increase in Chl-a in the central bay warrants further investigation, as it could indicate shifts in the ecological balance due to anthropogenic influences.

3.4. Comparison Between Nearshore and Offshore Marine Ranching

The YangMeikeng marine ranch, a representative example of nearshore marine ranching, exhibits distinct seasonal variations in Chl-a concentration throughout the year, as shown in Figure 6. Chl-a concentrations are higher from May to October, while they remain relatively low from November to March. Figure 7 illustrates the seasonal changes in the XiaoXingshan marine ranch, an example of offshore marine ranching. Compared to YangMeikeng, the duration of elevated Chl-a concentrations at XiaoXingshan is shorter, with the highest peak occurring primarily in May and June, followed by lower concentrations during the remaining months. Nearshore marine ranching is more susceptible to terrestrial pollution due to its proximity to the coast [54]. In contrast, offshore marine ranching benefits from cleaner seawater with less exposure to terrestrial contaminants, stronger seawater circulation, and richer marine biodiversity. However, nearshore marine ranching has lower management and maintenance costs and is more accessible for routine monitoring and management. Therefore, it is essential to consider various factors when planning and developing marine ranching to ensure site-specific and sustainable practices.

4. Discussion

4.1. Spatiotemporal Analysis of Chl-a

The spatial distribution of Chl-a exhibits a general decreasing trend from land towards the ocean. Coastal waters are more susceptible to the input of land-based pollutants and human activities, resulting in higher Chl-a concentrations. However, certain areas within the bay also exhibit high Chl-a concentrations, potentially due to disturbances caused by suspended sediments. Suspended sediments act as key carriers for pollutant migration and recirculation. With their high specific surface area and adsorption capacity, these sediments can adsorb a variety of pollutants, including heavy metals, organic contaminants, and nutrients [55,56]. This adsorption process facilitates pollutant migration and diffusion alongside suspended sediments or their subsequent sedimentation and fixation [57]. At the bay mouth, Chl-a concentrations are relatively low, as offshore areas experience a dilution effect due to seawater influx. Offshore waters generally contain fewer pollutants and nutrients, and the dilution process further reduces the concentrations of pollutants, including Chl-a [58,59]. This dilution effect is particularly pronounced in the bay mouth and areas with active tidal exchange [60], contributing to a reduction in pollutant loads and an improvement in water quality.
In intra-annual variation, the seasonal fluctuations in Chl-a concentration are closely tied to phytoplankton growth cycles, oceanic dynamics, and environmental conditions, which together account for the pronounced seasonal changes observed in Daya Bay. During winter, most phytoplankton enter a dormant state, leading to lower Chl-a concentrations in this season. As early summer approaches, rising sea temperatures in Daya Bay, combined with upwelling along the eastern Guangdong coast, bring nutrient-rich deep waters to the surface, further stimulating phytoplankton growth. The rapid proliferation of algae during the summer results in a sharp increase in Chl-a concentrations over a short period [61]. Moreover, large river runoffs in summer deliver additional nutrients into Daya Bay, enhancing vertical mixing in the water column and providing more resources for phytoplankton growth [62,63].

4.2. Pollution Source Analysis

Figure 8a shows the kernel density estimation of Chl-a in Daya Bay, highlighting two hotspot regions with elevated Chl-a concentrations. Most of the Chl-a in nearshore areas is derived from terrestrial inputs [64]. According to marine and fishery statistical bulletins, Region I (Figure 8b) is designated as an aquaculture zone [65]. In aquaculture, large amounts of feed and bait are introduced, containing abundant nutrients, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus, which are essential for algal growth [66,67,68]. As the concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus increase, algae proliferate rapidly, leading to a rise in Chl-a concentration in the water [69,70]. This phenomenon is especially evident in aquaculture areas, where excessive nutrient inputs not only promote algal growth but can also trigger eutrophication and other ecological issues. This explains the elevated Chl-a concentrations in Region I, consistent with the patterns observed in this study. A similar pattern of higher Chl-a concentrations is observed in the coastal areas of Region II (Figure 8c). Region II encompasses the estuary of the Dan’ao River, which may be influenced by terrestrial pollutants. As the largest tributary flowing into Daya Bay, the Dan’ao River is heavily impacted by domestic wastewater, contributing the majority of dissolved inorganic nitrogen and dissolved reactive phosphorus to the bay [71]. In addition to nitrogen and phosphorus from urban wastewater, agricultural chemical pollution is also a significant contributor to nutrient enrichment in Daya Bay [72]. Furthermore, discharges from the Dan’ao River and nearby industrial areas are also considered major sources of pollution [73]. These findings align with the patterns observed in this study.

4.3. Uncertainty Analysis

In remote sensing-based Chl-a retrieval, there exist several uncertainties that require further investigation. Firstly, over 90% of the radiation signal received by sensors originates from atmospheric effects, such as Rayleigh scattering, with water-related signals accounting for less than 10% [74]. Therefore, the accuracy of atmospheric correction directly influences the final accuracy of water quality remote sensing inversion. Additionally, the concentration and type of aerosols vary significantly across different regions and seasons [75,76]. The presence of residual transparent cirrus clouds, cloud cover over the water surface, and shadows from ships and riverside structures are difficult to fully eliminate, further increasing uncertainty in atmospheric correction.
The components in water exhibit both temporal and spatial variability, and they have different impacts on the absorption and scattering characteristics of light. This leads to heterogeneity in inherent optical properties (IOPs) over time and space. The radiative transfer model used in this study relies on IOPs, and their spatiotemporal heterogeneity adds uncertainty to the inversion results. Due to data availability constraints, this study’s model was unable to further account for the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of IOP. Moreover, in shallow water areas, bottom reflection may affect the water’s reflectance signal, potentially leading to biased estimates of Chl-a concentration. Future research will focus on further analyzing the temporal and spatial variations in IOPs and the bottom substrate in shallow water areas to reduce uncertainty in the model.

5. Conclusions

Regular Chl-a monitoring is essential for maintaining the ecological balance of coastal ecosystems and ensuring the high-quality operation of marine ranching. The spatial distribution of Chl-a concentrations derived from Sentinel-2 satellite inversion products reveals higher Chl-a concentrations at the top of the Daya Bay and lower ones at the bay mouth. Seasonal variation in Chl-a concentrations is evident throughout the year, with higher concentrations in summer and lower in winter. The main drivers behind this seasonal variation are water temperature, phytoplankton growth conditions, and ocean dynamics. In Yangmeikeng waters, Chl-a concentrations show a declining trend with the development of marine ranching. Additionally, compared to the YangMeikeng (nearshore) marine ranch, XiaoXingshan (offshore) is less impacted by terrestrial pollutants. These findings can help local governments take effective measures to improve marine ranching planning, construction, and water quality management.

Author Contributions

J.Y.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data analysis, Validation, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review and Editing. R.D.: Conceptualization, Supervision. Y.M.: Data analysis. J.L.: Formal analysis. Y.G.: Formal analysis. C.L.: Investigation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41071230 and 41901352); the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China (No. 2017B020216001); the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (No. 2020A1515010780 and 2022B1515130001); and the Guangzhou Science and Technology Programme (No. 202102020454).

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the data support of the European Space Agency (ESA) and the South China Sea Institute of Oceanology. Additionally, we sincerely appreciate all the anonymous reviewers for their excellent comments and efforts.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhou, Q.; Wang, S.; Liu, J.; Hu, X.; Liu, Y.; He, Y.; He, X.; Wu, X. Geological Evolution of Offshore Pollution and Its Long-Term Potential Impacts on Marine Ecosystems. Geosci. Front. 2022, 13, 101427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Häder, D.P.; Banaszak, A.T.; Villafañe, V.E.; Narvarte, M.A.; González, R.A.; Helbling, E.W. Anthropogenic Pollution of Aquatic Ecosystems: Emerging Problems with Global Implications. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 713, 136586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Brugère, C.; Aguilar-Manjarrez, J.; Beveridge, M.C.M.; Soto, D. The Ecosystem Approach to Aquaculture 10 Years on—A Critical Review and Consideration of Its Future Role in Blue Growth. Rev. Aquac. 2019, 11, 493–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Eikeset, A.M.; Mazzarella, A.B.; Davíðsdóttir, B.; Klinger, D.H.; Levin, S.A.; Rovenskaya, E.; Stenseth, N.C. What Is Blue Growth? The Semantics of “Sustainable Development” of Marine Environments. Mar. Policy 2018, 87, 177–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhou, X.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, S.; Lin, J. Marine Ranching Construction and Management in East China Sea: Programs for Sustainable Fishery and Aquaculture. Water 2019, 11, 1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Qin, M.; Wang, X.; Du, Y.; Wan, X. Influencing Factors of Spatial Variation of National Marine Ranching in China. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2021, 199, 105407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yu, H.; Wang, Y.; Yin, W.; Li, D. Policy Network Analysis of China’s Ocean Ranching Policy: Network Structure, Actors and Interaction. Mar. Policy 2022, 140, 105070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brown, A.R.; Webber, J.; Zonneveld, S.; Carless, D.; Jackson, B.; Artioli, Y.; Miller, P.I.; Holmyard, J.; Baker-Austin, C.; Kershaw, S.; et al. Stakeholder Perspectives on the Importance of Water Quality and Other Constraints for Sustainable Mariculture. Environ. Sci. Policy 2020, 114, 506–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gambin, A.F.; Angelats, E.; Gonzalez, J.S.; Miozzo, M.; DIni, P. Sustainable Marine Ecosystems: Deep Learning for Water Quality Assessment and Forecasting. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 121344–121365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Purcell, A.; Bruen, M.; Cocchiglia, L.; Kelly-Quinn, M. Water Quality Monitoring during the Construction of the M3 Motorway in Ireland. Water Environ. J. 2012, 26, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Neposhyvailenko, N.; Omelych, I.; Dziuba, N. Assessment of Environmental Impact of Road Construction Based on Results of Remote Sensing Monitoring. Agrology 2024, 7, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vidic, R.D.; Brantley, S.L.; Vandenbossche, J.M.; Yoxtheimer, D.; Abad, J.D. Impact of Shale Gas Development on Regional Water Quality. Science 2013, 340, 1235009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zahir, M.; Su, Y.; Shahzad, M.I.; Ayub, G.; Rahman, S.U.; Ijaz, J. A Review on Monitoring, Forecasting, and Early Warning of Harmful Algal Bloom. Aquaculture 2024, 593, 741351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Arndt, J.; Kirchner, J.S.; Jewell, K.S.; Schluesener, M.P.; Wick, A.; Ternes, T.A.; Duester, L. Making Waves: Time for Chemical Surface Water Quality Monitoring to Catch up with Its Technical Potential. Water Res. 2022, 213, 118168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Blondeau-Patissier, D.; Gower, J.F.R.; Dekker, A.G.; Phinn, S.R.; Brando, V.E. A Review of Ocean Color Remote Sensing Methods and Statistical Techniques for the Detection, Mapping and Analysis of Phytoplankton Blooms in Coastal and Open Oceans. Prog. Oceanogr. 2014, 123, 123–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cao, Q.; Yu, G.; Sun, S.; Dou, Y.; Li, H.; Qiao, Z. Monitoring Water Quality of the Haihe River Based on Ground-Based Hyperspectral Remote Sensing. Water 2022, 14, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Y.; Li, W.; Wen, W.; Zhuang, F.; Yu, T.; Zhang, L.; Zhuang, Y. Universal High-Frequency Monitoring Methods of River Water Quality in China Based on Machine Learning. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 947, 174641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, L.; Driscol, J.; Sarigai, S.; Wu, Q.; Lippitt, C.D.; Morgan, M. Towards Synoptic Water Monitoring Systems: A Review of AI Methods for Automating Water Body Detection and Water Quality Monitoring Using Remote Sensing. Sensors 2022, 22, 2416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Adjovu, G.E.; Stephen, H.; James, D.; Ahmad, S. Overview of the Application of Remote Sensing in Effective Monitoring of Water Quality Parameters. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, L.; Yue, X.; Wang, H.; Ling, K.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; Hong, J.; Pen, W.; Song, H. Dynamic Inversion of Inland Aquaculture Water Quality Based on UAVs-WSN Spectral Analysis. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yu, C.; Zhang, Z. Multispectral Remote Sensing for Estimating Water Quality Parameters: A Comparative Study of Inversion Methods Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). Sustainability 2023, 15, 10298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, H.; Kong, J.; Hu, H.; Du, Y.; Gao, M.; Chen, F. A Review of Remote Sensing for Water Quality Retrieval: Progress and Challenges. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lai, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, Z.; Yin, Y.; Chen, X.; Jin, J.; Wu, S. Long-Term Spatiotemporal Mapping in Lacustrine Environment by Remote Sensing:Review with Case Study, Challenges, and Future Directions. Water Res. 2024, 267, 122457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jiao, W.; Wang, L.; McCabe, M.F. Multi-Sensor Remote Sensing for Drought Characterization: Current Status, Opportunities and a Roadmap for the Future. Remote Sens. Environ. 2021, 256, 112313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shao, Z.; Wu, W.; Li, D. Spatio-Temporal-Spectral Observation Model for Urban Remote Sensing. Geo-Spat. Inf. Sci. 2021, 24, 372–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sishodia, R.P.; Ray, R.L.; Singh, S.K. Applications of Remote Sensing in Precision Agriculture: A Review. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Khanal, S.; Kushal, K.C.; Fulton, J.P.; Shearer, S.; Ozkan, E. Remote Sensing in Agriculture—Accomplishments, Limitations, and Opportunities. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zainurin, S.N.; Wan Ismail, W.Z.; Mahamud, S.N.I.; Ismail, I.; Jamaludin, J.; Ariffin, K.N.Z.; Wan Ahmad Kamil, W.M. Advancements in Monitoring Water Quality Based on Various Sensing Methods: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2022, 19, 14080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, J.; Chen, S.; Fu, R.; Li, D.; Jiang, H.; Wang, C.; Peng, Y.; Jia, K.; Hicks, B.J. Remote Sensing Big Data for Water Environment Monitoring: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Prospects. Earths Future 2022, 10, e2021EF002289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhou, S.; Xiao, M.; Zhang, J.; Huang, Y.; Jin, Z.; Xiong, B. Inversion of Water Quality by Remote-Sensing Monitoring Based on Machine Learning in Complex Freshwater Environments. Desalination Water Treat. 2023, 291, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Adjovu, G.E.; Stephen, H.; James, D.; Ahmad, S. Measurement of Total Dissolved Solids and Total Suspended Solids in Water Systems: A Review of the Issues, Conventional, and Remote Sensing Techniques. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 3534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, J.; Wang, Y.S. A Comprehensive Approach to Assessing Eutrophication for the Guangdong Coastal Waters in China. Front. Mar. Sci. 2023, 10, 1280821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lan, J.; Liu, P.; Hu, X.; Zhu, S. Harmful Algal Blooms in Eutrophic Marine Environments: Causes, Monitoring, and Treatment. Water 2024, 16, 2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, W.; Huang, R.; Deng, S.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y. Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Sea Surface Chlorophyll-a in Coral Reefs of the South China Sea over the Past Decade Based on Landsat-8 Operational Land Images. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 935, 173433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, S.; Liu, N.; Luo, M.; Jiang, T.; Chan, T.O.; Yau, C.S.T.; Sun, Y. Downscaling Sentinel-3 Chlorophyll-a Concentration for Inland Lakes Based on Multivariate Analysis and Gradient Boosting Decision Trees Regression. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2023, 16, 7850–7865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Christou, P.; Domenikiotis, C.; Neofitou, N.; Vafidis, D. Study of the Spatiotemporal Variability of Oceanographic Parameters and Their Relationship to Holothuria Species Abundance in a Marine Protected Area of the Mediterranean Using Satellite Imagery. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 5946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Quang, N.H.; Nguyen, M.N.; Paget, M.; Anstee, J.; Viet, N.D.; Nones, M.; Tuan, V.A. Assessment of Human-Induced Effects on Sea/Brackish Water Chlorophyll-a Concentration in Ha Long Bay of Vietnam with Google Earth Engine. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cen, H.; Jiang, J.; Han, G.; Lin, X.; Liu, Y.; Jia, X.; Ji, Q.; Li, B. Applying Deep Learning in the Prediction of Chlorophyll-a in the East China Sea. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 5461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Scharvogel, D.; Brandmeier, M.; Weis, M. A Deep Learning Approach for Calamity Assessment Using Sentinel-2 Data. Forests 2020, 11, 1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Campos-Taberner, M.; García-Haro, F.J.; Martínez, B.; Izquierdo-Verdiguier, E.; Atzberger, C.; Camps-Valls, G.; Gilabert, M.A. Understanding Deep Learning in Land Use Classification Based on Sentinel-2 Time Series. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lasaponara, R.; Tucci, B.; Ghermandi, L. On the Use of Satellite Sentinel 2 Data for Automatic Mapping of Burnt Areas and Burn Severity. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cian, F.; Delgado Blasco, J.M.; Ivanescu, C. Improving Rapid Flood Impact Assessment: An Enhanced Multi-Sensor Approach Including a New Flood Mapping Method Based on Sentinel-2 Data. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 369, 122326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Phiri, D.; Simwanda, M.; Salekin, S.; Nyirenda, V.R.; Murayama, Y.; Ranagalage, M. Sentinel-2 Data for Land Cover/Use Mapping: A Review. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Alekseev, A.; Chernikhovskii, D. Assessment of the Health Status of Tree Stands Based on Sentinel-2B Remote Sensing Materials and the Short-Wave Vegetation Index SWVI. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing Ltd.: Bristol, UK, 2021; Volume 876. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zeng, L.; Li, D. Development of in Situ Sensors for Chlorophyll Concentration Measurement. J. Sens. 2015, 2015, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liqiong, J.H.; Chen, C.X.; Tian, L.; Feng, L.; Yesou, H.; Li, F.; Huang, J.; Chen, L.; Chen, X. Modification and Validation of a Quasi-Analytical Algorithm for Inherent Optical Properties in the Turbid Waters of Poyang Lake, China. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2014, 8, 083643. [Google Scholar]
  47. Vanhellemont, Q. Adaptation of the Dark Spectrum Fitting Atmospheric Correction for Aquatic Applications of the Landsat and Sentinel-2 Archives. Remote Sens. Environ. 2019, 225, 175–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, J.; Zhang, W.; Deng, R.; Lu, Z.; Liang, Y.; Shen, X.; Xiong, L.; Liu, Y. The Study of Spatial-Temporal Characteristics for CODMn in Shenzhen Reservoir Based on GF-1 WFV. J. Remote Sens. 2022, 26, 1562–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lu, S.; Deng, R.; Liang, Y.; Xiong, L.; Ai, X.; Qin, Y. Remote Sensing Retrieval of Total Phosphorus in the Pearl River Channels Based on the GF-1 Remote Sensing Data. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ruru, D.; Yingqing, H.; Yan, Q.; Qidong, C.; Lei, C. Measuring Pure Water Absorption Coefficient in the Near-Infrared Spectrum (900–2500 nm). J. Remote Sens. 2012, 16, 192–206. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang, J.; Tong, Y.; Feng, L.; Zhao, D.; Zheng, C.; Tang, J. Satellite-Observed Decreases in Water Turbidity in the Pearl River Estuary: Potential Linkage with Sea-Level Rise. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 2021, 126, e2020JC016842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Guan, Q.; Feng, L.; Hou, X.; Schurgers, G.; Zheng, Y.; Tang, J. Eutrophication changes in fifty large lakes on the Yangtze Plain of China derived from MERIS and OLCI observations. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2020, 246, 111890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jiang, G.; Loiselle, S.A.; Yang, D.; Ma, R.; Su, W.; Gao, C. Remote estimation of chlorophyll a concentrations over a wide range of optical conditions based on water classification from VIIRS observations. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2020, 241, 111735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tang, X.; Li, R.; Han, D.; Scholz, M. Response of Eutrophication Development to Variations in Nutrients and Hydrological Regime: A Case Study in the Changjiang River (Yangtze) Basin. Water 2020, 12, 1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, C.; Song, Y.; Li, Y.; Yin, Y.; Cai, Y. Confounding effects of seasonality and anthropogenic river regulation on suspended particulate matter-driven mercury transport to coastal seas. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 469, 133979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, X.; Sheng, Y.; Liu, Q.; Li, Z. Suspended particulate matter affects the distribution and migration of heavy metals in the Yellow River. Sci. Total. Environ. 2024, 912, 169537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zou, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Ahmed, M.K.; Chen, K.; Wu, J.; Xu, Y.; Lin, Y.; Xiao, X.; Chen, B.; et al. Distribution and assessment of heavy metals in suspended particles in the Sundarban mangrove river, Bangladesh. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 181, 113856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhou, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhou, Y.; Mao, X.-Z. Eutrophication control strategies for highly anthropogenic influenced coastal waters. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 705, 135760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Xiong, J.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, J.; Quan, F.; Lu, H.; Zeng, H. Impact of climate change on coastal water quality and its interaction with pollution prevention efforts. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 325, 116557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sun, X.; Dong, Z.; Zhang, W.; Sun, X.; Hou, C.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, J.; et al. Seasonal and spatial variations in nutrients under the influence of natural and anthropogenic factors in coastal waters of the northern Yellow Sea, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 175, 113171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lv, H.; Yang, J.; Liu, L.; Yu, X.; Yu, Z.; Chiang, P. Temperature and nutrients are significant drivers of seasonal shift in phytoplankton community from a drinking water reservoir, subtropical China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 5917–5928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jäger, C.G.; Diehl, S.; Schmidt, G.M. Influence of water-column depth and mixing on phytoplankton biomass, community composition, and nutrients. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2008, 53, 2361–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Klausmeier, C.A.; Litchman, E. Algal games: The vertical distribution of phytoplankton in poorly mixed water columns. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2001, 46, 1998–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, Y.; Gao, Z. Contrasting chlorophyll-a seasonal patterns between nearshore and offshore waters in the Bohai and Yellow Seas, China: A new analysis using improved satellite data. Cont. Shelf Res. 2020, 203, 104173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, Z.; Li, S.; Liu, Z.; Sun, Z.; Mo, L.; Bao, M.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, X. Diversity and distribution of culturable fouling bacteria in typical mariculture zones in Daya Bay, South China. Arch. Microbiol. 2023, 205, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bai, D.; Li, X.; Liu, Z.; Wan, L.; Song, C.; Zhou, Y.; Cao, X. Nitrogen and phosphorus turnover and coupling in ponds with different aquaculture species. Aquaculture 2023, 563, 738997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Albrektsen, S.; Kortet, R.; Skov, P.V.; Ytteborg, E.; Gitlesen, S.; Kleinegris, D.; Mydland, L.; Hansen, J.Ø.; Lock, E.; Mørkøre, T.; et al. Future feed resources in sustainable salmonid production: A review. Rev. Aquac. 2022, 14, 1790–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Naseem, S.; Bhat, S.U.; Gani, A.; Bhat, F.A. Perspectives on utilization of macrophytes as feed ingredient for fish in future aquaculture. Rev. Aquac. 2021, 13, 282–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ma, M.; Jia, J.; Hu, Y.; Yang, J.; Lu, Y.; Shi, K.; Gao, Y. Changes in chlorophyll a and its response to nitrogen and phosphorus characteristics over the past three decades in Poyang Lake, China. Ecohydrology 2021, 14, e2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nong, X.; Huang, L.; Chen, L.; Wei, J.; Li, R. Distribution, relationship, and environmental driving factors of chlorophyll-a and algal cell density: A national view of China. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2024, 54, e03084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rajapaksha, R.P.; Wu, M.-L.; Wang, Y.-T.; Bandara, G.; Atapaththu, K.S.S.; Wang, Y.-S. Long-term alterations of nutrient dynamics and phytoplankton communities in Daya Bay, South China Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2024, 208, 116955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Xiong, L.; Xi, B.; Wu, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhang, L.; Huang, X.; Macreadie, P.I. Nutrient input estimation and reduction strategies related to land use and landscape pattern (LULP) in a near-eutrophic coastal bay with a small watershed in the South China sea. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2021, 206, 105573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tao, W.; Li, H.; Peng, X.; Zhang, W.; Lou, Q.; Gong, J.; Ye, J. Characteristics of Heavy Metals in Seawater and Sediments from Daya Bay (South China): Environmental Fates, Source Apportionment and Ecological Risks. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kaufman, Y.J.; Tanré, D.; Gordon, H.R.; Nakajima, T.; Lenoble, J.; Frouin, R.; Grassl, H.; Herman, B.M.; King, M.D.; Teillet, P.M. Passive remote sensing of tropospheric aerosol and atmospheric correction for the aerosol effect. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 1997, 102, 16815–16830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhao, B.; Jiang, J.H.; Diner, D.J.; Su, H.; Gu, Y.; Liou, K.-N.; Jiang, Z.; Huang, L.; Takano, Y.; Fan, X.; et al. Intra-annual variations of regional aerosol optical depth, vertical distribution, and particle types from multiple satellite and ground-based observational datasets. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2018, 18, 11247–11260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sun, Y.L.; Wang, Z.F.; Du, W.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Q.Q.; Fu, P.Q.; Pan, X.L.; Li, J.; Jayne, J.; Worsnop, D.R. Long-term real-time measurements of aerosol particle composition in Beijing, China: Seasonal variations, meteorological effects, and source analysis. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 10149–10165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of Daya Bay and the sites of in situ Chl-a data (e.g., GPDEE, SCSIO data). SCSIO represents the in situ data collected by the South China Sea Institute of Oceanology; GPDEE represents the Guangdong Provincial Department of Ecology and Environment data.
Figure 1. Location of Daya Bay and the sites of in situ Chl-a data (e.g., GPDEE, SCSIO data). SCSIO represents the in situ data collected by the South China Sea Institute of Oceanology; GPDEE represents the Guangdong Provincial Department of Ecology and Environment data.
Water 17 00780 g001
Figure 2. Satellite imagery preprocessing flowchart.
Figure 2. Satellite imagery preprocessing flowchart.
Water 17 00780 g002
Figure 3. Accuracy assessment result.
Figure 3. Accuracy assessment result.
Water 17 00780 g003
Figure 4. Intra-annual Chl-a distribution in Daya Bay from Sentinel-2. White areas in the resulting maps indicate land regions. The seasonal divisions in Daya Bay are as follows: March to May is spring, June to August is summer, September to November is autumn, and December to February of the following year is winter.
Figure 4. Intra-annual Chl-a distribution in Daya Bay from Sentinel-2. White areas in the resulting maps indicate land regions. The seasonal divisions in Daya Bay are as follows: March to May is spring, June to August is summer, September to November is autumn, and December to February of the following year is winter.
Water 17 00780 g004
Figure 5. The rate of change in Chl-a concentration (μg/L yr−1). The map on the left shows the Chl-a concentration change rate in YangMeikeng. Only locations with significant trends (p < 0.05) are color-coded.
Figure 5. The rate of change in Chl-a concentration (μg/L yr−1). The map on the left shows the Chl-a concentration change rate in YangMeikeng. Only locations with significant trends (p < 0.05) are color-coded.
Water 17 00780 g005
Figure 6. Monthly Chl-a distribution in the YangMeikeng marine ranch.
Figure 6. Monthly Chl-a distribution in the YangMeikeng marine ranch.
Water 17 00780 g006
Figure 7. Monthly Chl-a distribution in the XiaoXingshan marine ranch.
Figure 7. Monthly Chl-a distribution in the XiaoXingshan marine ranch.
Water 17 00780 g007
Figure 8. Kernel density estimation (a); pollution source Region I (b); pollution source Region II (c).
Figure 8. Kernel density estimation (a); pollution source Region I (b); pollution source Region II (c).
Water 17 00780 g008
Table 2. Statistical comparison between the in situ value and model retrieval value of Chl-a.
Table 2. Statistical comparison between the in situ value and model retrieval value of Chl-a.
No.DateMeasured Value
(μg/L)
Inversion Value
(μg/L)
MAPE
120 October 20204.55.6826.22%
221 October 20201.92.3121.58%
321 October 202021.3234.00%
422 October 20201.42.6085.71%
522 October 20201.351.312.96%
622 October 20201.30.8137.69%
731 October 20204.495.3118.35%
81 November 20200.330.83151.52%
930 October 20201.051.7869.52%
1022 October 20203.53.1210.86%
111 November 20200.61.44140.00%
1216 August 20196.044.3527.98%
1316 August 20196.825.7715.40%
1416 August 20191.531.8218.95%
1516 August 20191.753.1580.00%
1617 August 20199.485.3343.78%
1717 August 20195.687.6234.15%
1816 August 20193.514.2220.23%
1917 August 20194.854.771.63%
2017 August 20194.946.2125.71%
2117 August 20199.8312.5427.57%
2217 August 20199.9813.6136.37%
2318 August 20199.98.6612.48%
2416 August 20192.064.51118.93%
2517 August 20191.610.4870.19%
2617 August 20192.613.2725.29%
2718 August 20194.52.7838.22%
2818 August 20192.466.48163.41%
2918 August 20192.553.6643.53%
3017 August 20191.61.534.38%
3118 August 20191.572.3449.04%
3218 August 20191.532.1943.14%
3315 August 20191.461.2812.33%
3418 August 20194.474.694.92%
3515 August 20191.360.7247.06%
3615 August 20190.180.3383.33%
3715 August 20191.661.547.23%
3816 August 20193.544.5227.68%
Min-0.180.331.63%
Max-9.9813.61163.41%
Average-3.423.8144.25%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, J.; Deng, R.; Ma, Y.; Li, J.; Guo, Y.; Lei, C. Satellite Retrieval and Spatiotemporal Variability in Chlorophyll-a for Marine Ranching: An Example from Daya Bay, Guangdong Province, China. Water 2025, 17, 780. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17060780

AMA Style

Yang J, Deng R, Ma Y, Li J, Guo Y, Lei C. Satellite Retrieval and Spatiotemporal Variability in Chlorophyll-a for Marine Ranching: An Example from Daya Bay, Guangdong Province, China. Water. 2025; 17(6):780. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17060780

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Junying, Ruru Deng, Yiwei Ma, Jiayi Li, Yu Guo, and Cong Lei. 2025. "Satellite Retrieval and Spatiotemporal Variability in Chlorophyll-a for Marine Ranching: An Example from Daya Bay, Guangdong Province, China" Water 17, no. 6: 780. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17060780

APA Style

Yang, J., Deng, R., Ma, Y., Li, J., Guo, Y., & Lei, C. (2025). Satellite Retrieval and Spatiotemporal Variability in Chlorophyll-a for Marine Ranching: An Example from Daya Bay, Guangdong Province, China. Water, 17(6), 780. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17060780

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop