Next Article in Journal
Quantifying Moisture Source Contributions to Diverse Precipitation Events over the Tibetan Plateau
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Nitrate Sources in the Upper Reaches of Xin’an River Basin Based on the MixSIAR Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optical Analysis Based on UV Absorption Spectrum for Monitoring Total Organic Carbon and Nitrate Nitrogen in River Water

1
Integrated Engineering, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Kyung Hee University, 1732 Deogyeong-daero, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si 17104, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
2
Technical Research Center, HSKorea Co., Ltd., Doosan VentureDigm #826, 415 Heungan-daero, Dongan-gu, Anyang-si 14059, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
3
Plant Engineering Center, Institute for Advanced Engineering, 633-2 Goan-ri, Baegam-myon, Cheoin-gu, Yongin-si 17528, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Water 2025, 17(24), 3586; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17243586
Submission received: 15 November 2025 / Revised: 13 December 2025 / Accepted: 15 December 2025 / Published: 17 December 2025

Abstract

The global deterioration of water quality due to climate change and industrialization has intensified the need for real-time monitoring systems. In South Korea’s automated water quality monitoring networks, measuring total organic carbon (TOC) and nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) as a proxy for total nitrogen (TN) is critical; however, conventional analytical instruments face limitations such as high costs, long analysis times, and the need for chemical reagents. In this study, we developed and evaluated a simultaneous TOC and NO3-N measurement method using HASM-4000, a domestically developed optical sensor based on ultraviolet (UV) absorption spectroscopy. The sensor measures absorbance at 254 nm (TOC) and 220 nm (NO3-N) based on the Beer–Lambert law, with signal processing techniques including optical power compensation (OPC) and Binning–Interpolation (BinInterp) applied to enhance measurement accuracy. Calibration using standard solutions demonstrated excellent linear correlations (R2 > 0.99) between actual and estimated concentrations for both TOC and NO3-N, with accuracy and reproducibility validated against standard methods under laboratory conditions. However, performance degradation was observed in turbid mixed samples due to the optical limitations of the 10 mm pathlength, suggesting the need for future improvements such as adopting a 5 mm pathlength and upgrading optical components. The HASM-4000 sensor enables real-time measurement without a reagent, and preliminary testing with river water samples demonstrates its potential to advance Korea’s water quality monitoring infrastructure by reducing dependence on foreign technologies and facilitating network expansion with cost-effective domestic solutions.

1. Introduction

Globally, water pollution issues have intensified due to climate change, industrialization, and urbanization, increasing the importance of water quality management for rivers, lakes, reservoirs, and groundwater resources [1,2]. To ensure sustainable water resource security and aquatic ecosystem conservation, monitoring systems capable of real-time surveillance and rapid response to water quality changes should be established. In alignment with this international trend, South Korea’s water quality management policy paradigm has shifted from post-treatment approaches to preventive and real-time management systems.
In South Korea, the Ministry of Environment operates various forms of automated water quality monitoring networks (including total automated water quality, load, and nonpoint source pollution monitoring networks) to systematically manage the quality of the water in major rivers nationwide. These networks continuously monitor and manage key water quality indicators including total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), turbidity, electrical conductivity (EC), and temperature [3,4]. These automated monitoring networks serve various purposes, such as signaling early warnings of water quality degradation, tracking pollution sources, and providing scientific evidence for water quality policy formulation [4].
Currently, physicochemical parameters such as pH, DO, turbidity, and electrical conductivity in automated water quality monitoring networks can be measured in real time using multi-parameter sensors [5]. These sensors are based on electrode or optical principles and can be miniaturized and automated, facilitating easy field installation and maintenance. In contrast, organic matter and nutrient indicators such as TOC, TN, and TP still rely on analytical instrument-based measurement methods [6], which offer advantages such as automated measurement capability, high accuracy, and stability, but they possess several inherent limitations, including the following:
  • High initial purchase costs and maintenance expenses;
  • Large installation space and auxiliary equipment requirements;
  • Time requirements of 30 min to 1 h from sample collection to analysis results;
  • Secondary waste generation from large volumes of samples and chemical reagents;
  • Requirement for specialized personnel to maintain precise analytical conditions.
These limitations act as major constraints on policies to expand water quality monitoring networks for broader and more monitoring sites.
Against this background, the transition from analytical instruments to sensor-type measurement devices has recently become a global trend in the water quality monitoring field [7]. In particular, optical sensors utilizing ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) absorbance principles are receiving attention as next-generation water quality monitoring technologies as they are reagentless, enable real-time measurement, and require simple maintenance [8].
UV absorbance-based optical sensors utilize the principle that dissolved organic matter and nitrate in water absorb ultraviolet light at specific wavelengths [9,10]. Organic matter exhibits strong absorbance primarily at the 254 nm wavelength, while nitrate (NO3) shows characteristic absorption spectra in the 200–220 nm wavelength region [11,12,13]. Using these spectroscopic characteristics, TOC and nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) can be simultaneously measured without complex chemical analysis [7,14].
Currently, sensors capable of directly measuring TN do not exist technologically, and the practical approach of measuring NO3-N, a major component of TN, is employed as an alternative. Particularly in oxidized river and lake environments, a significant portion of nitrogen compounds exists in the form of nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N). While ammonium or organic nitrogen may prevail near wastewater discharges, NO3-N measurement often functions as an effective surrogate indicator for total nitrogen (TN) in general surface water monitoring contexts.
However, South Korea’s technological capacity for optical sensors capable of simultaneously measuring TOC and NO3-N is severely limited, with products from a few global manufacturers dominating the market. This increases dependence on foreign equipment for water quality monitoring, causes difficulties in maintenance and technical support, and acts as a factor undermining the self-sufficiency of national water quality management infrastructure. Therefore, the development of simultaneous TOC·NO3-N measurement sensors based on domestic technology is a priority.
This study was conducted to evaluate the field applicability of TOC and NO3-N measurement methods using HASM-4000—a UV absorbance-based optical sensor developed with domestically developed technology—in response to these technical and policy needs. Specifically, the objectives were to (1) elucidate the measurement principles and structural characteristics of the HASM-4000 sensor; (2) establish calibration curves and conduct performance verification using standard materials under laboratory conditions; (3) assess measurement accuracy and reproducibility through comparative evaluation with certified analytical methods for actual river and lake water samples; and (4) identify potential applicability and limitations for field water quality monitoring. Although the calibration experiments were primarily based on standard and synthetic samples, the matrix-dependent nature of UV absorbance is well recognized. To partially address this limitation, ten river water samples collected from national monitoring sites in Korea were additionally analyzed, and comparisons between actual concentrations (TOC_real and NO3-N_real) and sensor-estimated concentrations (TOC_exp and NO3-N_exp) demonstrated preliminary but meaningful similarities (R2 = 0.819 for TOC; R2 = 0.868 for NO3-N). While the validation was performed using samples from Korean monitoring sites, the developed optical sensor platform addresses universal challenges in water quality monitoring such as high costs and reagent consumption. Thus, this study aims to contribute not only to local infrastructure but also to the global development of cost-effective, high-density monitoring networks.

2. Materials and Methods

Methods of measuring total organic carbon (TOC) and nitrate (NO3-N) using UV absorbance were developed, utilizing both a commercial Agilent Cary 60 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and a prototype HASM-4000 manufactured by HSKorea Co., Ltd. Absorbance (or optical density), representing the degree of light absorption in measured samples, was calculated from transmission spectrum information obtained from each instrument based on the Beer–Lambert law.
Absorbance was measured at various concentrations of total organic carbon (TOC), nitrate (NO3-N), and turbidity (NTU) using each instrument. These absorbance measurements were corrected via techniques such as optical power compensation (OPC) and Binning and Interpolation (BinInterp), and concentrations were calculated by deriving correlations.
The standard materials used in this study included distilled water (DI) with TOC and NO3-N concentrations of 0 mg/L or a turbidity of 0 NTU as the blank, and pure unmixed standard materials of 5 mg/L, 10 mg/L, and 20 mg/L were prepared. For mixed TOC and NO3-N solutions excluding turbidity (TU), TOC/NO3-N/TU concentrations were mixed at 5/5/0, 10/10/0, and 20/20/0, while mixed solutions including turbidity were mixed at 5/5/5, 10/10/10, and 20/20/20.

2.1. UV Absorbance Method

The UV absorbance method is used to measure absorbance at specific UV wavelengths to quantify water pollutant concentrations. Sample concentrations can be measured using the Beer–Lambert law, which states that the light absorbed by a solution depends on the concentration and liquid layer thickness. Many substances present in wastewater or river water absorb ultraviolet (UV) light, so concentrations are measured using light in the UV region between 190 and 400 nm.
The UV absorbance method has low maintenance costs and short response times and is known to be particularly suitable for measuring organic matter at low concentrations. A narrow wavelength range of the light source passed through a monochromator or filter is selected and passed through the sample layer, and then absorbance is measured with a detector to quantify the concentration of the target component.
When light passes through a sample, its intensity decreases due to absorption. Transmittance (T) is defined as the ratio of the transmitted light intensity (I) to the incident light intensity (I0), as shown in Equation (1):
T = I/I0
According to the Beer–Lambert law, absorbance (A) is defined as the logarithm of the reciprocal of transmittance, which represents the light absorption capacity of the sample. This relationship is expressed in Equation (2):
A = log(I0/I)

2.2. Data Processing and Correction Techniques

When smooth absorbance spectra cannot be confirmed in the short wavelength region by the UV absorbance method, absorbance or transmission spectra can be corrected through arithmetic methods such as Moving Average (MAvg) and Binning techniques to improve this problem.

2.2.1. Moving Average Method (MAvg)

The Moving Average technique is a smoothing technique that sets a window of constant size for consecutive data sections, calculates the average value of the data in that section, and generates new time series or spectral data. It effectively removes high-frequency noise present in the data, allowing overall signal patterns to be more clearly identified.
The basic formula for MAvg is as follows, where the new value yi at each position i is calculated as the average of n surrounding data points:
y i = 1 n k = i m i + m x k
where xk represents the raw data, and yi denotes the new data with the Moving Average applied. The window size is defined as n = 2m + 1, where m indicates the number of data points included to the left and right of the center point.
Through this technique, abrupt fluctuations and random noise are mitigated, and in spectral data, the stability and reliability of the transmission and absorbance are improved.
Transmission spectrum data output from the spectrometer represents wavelength versus light intensity information in a 2500 pixel × 2-column array format (first column: wavelength; second column: transmittance intensity). In this study, absorbance was calculated using transmittance intensity (second column) and the Beer–Lambert law, and an improved absorbance spectrum was obtained by applying MAvg with avg_size (~2.14 nm = 0.36 nm × 6) to the calculated absorbance.

2.2.2. Binning and Interpolation (BinInterp)

Data Binning is the process of grouping or simplifying data, which reduces data complexity and smooths data by mitigating the effects of noise or minor observation errors. It is particularly used to convert continuous data, such as absorption spectra, into categorical data to simplify analysis or prevent overfitting.
After dividing a given data range into a specific number of bins (sections), original data values belonging to each bin are replaced with representative values (mean, median, etc.) of that bin. As a result, data precision may somewhat decrease, but there is an advantage in identifying overall patterns or trends.
Binning can be simply represented as a function B that assigns an input variable X to specific bins:
B x = b i n l a b e l i     i f   L i < x < U i
Here, x represents the value of the input data point (the original continuous variable), and B(x) is the label or representative value assigned to the bin containing x. The interval [Li, Ui] is defined by the lower bound Li and the upper bound Ui of the i-th bin.
Interpolation (Interp) refers to the process of estimating and filling missing values between data points. It maintains data continuity and supplements missing information by predicting values at unobserved points and is utilized in various fields, including signal processing, where sampled signals are reconstructed into continuous signals.
Values between known data points can be estimated using specific functions (e.g., linear functions, polynomial functions, splines, etc.) based on known surrounding data values, generating new data points within the range of the original data to increase the dataset density or supplement missing data.
In this study, a 2500 × 2 data array, identical to RawData, was reconstructed using Binning and Interpolation (BinInterp). When using Binning, the total number of RawData decreases by the number divided by ‘Bin(2.14 nm, 6)’ (2500/6). To compensate for this data reduction, Interpolation was applied to the binned data in this study to convert it to a 2500 × 2 data array.

2.3. Spectral Analysis Equipment

2.3.1. Agilent Cary 60

The commercial product used for absorbance analysis in this study was the Agilent Cary 60 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Figure 1). This laboratory-grade equipment utilizes two optical paths and a photomultiplier tube (PMT) to simultaneously measure light transmitted through a blank (empty cuvette) and a sample at a single wavelength. This dual-beam configuration provides stable absorbance readings by minimizing noise generated by light-source-intensity fluctuations.
For the analysis of TOC and NO3-N standard samples, absorbance spectra were acquired in the wavelength range of 190–390 nm, with a scanning step size of 2 nm and an integration time of 0.1 s at each wavelength.
TOC and NO3-N standard samples were analyzed using the Cary 60 with a step size of 2 nm and an integration time of 0.1 s at each wavelength, measuring absorbance spectra while varying standard sample concentrations from 190 nm to 390 nm.

2.3.2. HSKorea Co., Ltd. HASM-4000

The ultimate goal of this study was to develop a sensor-type device capable of measuring TOC and NO3-N in a manner suitable for in situ applications. Unlike the Cary 60 described above, the prototype HASM-4000 (Figure 2) employs a single optical path and a 1D-array optical detector (1 × 2500 pixels).
For each sample, light emitted from the light source (Xenon flash lamp L4622, 10 W, Hamamatsu, Hamamatsu City, Japan) in the 200–1100 nm range passes through the sample on the 10 mm optical beam path and enters an optical fiber with a core diameter of 1 mm, and the transmitted light then propagates to the spectrometer, which provides transmission spectrum (optical transmittance) information about the sample in the wavelength region from 150 nm to 1050 nm (0.36 nm/px × 2500 px) inside the spectrometer.
To achieve relatively uniform distribution of light intensity emitted from the light source, the light propagation direction was changed to become similar to parallel light, and unnecessary external light was reduced. Then, a diffuser (DF) and a pinhole (PH) were placed in front of the light source and optical fiber, respectively. Although the Beer–Lambert law theoretically requires monochromatic light and the absence of stray light, practical in situ sensors often utilize broadband light sources (e.g., Xenon flash lamps) and array detectors to achieve real-time monitoring. This approach is widely adopted in both academic research and industrial applications [15]. For instance, Kim et al. [16] and Li et al. [17] successfully quantified organic compounds using similar optical configurations, and Shi et al. [18] validated the use of submersible UV-Vis spectrophotometers for environmental monitoring. Furthermore, commercial sensors from major manufacturers (e.g., YSI) also calculate absorbance based on the fundamental relationship A = log(I0/I) [5]. To ensure the validity of this approach in HASM-4000, we incorporated a diffuser and pinhole to minimize stray light and ensure quasi-collimation, and applied optical power compensation (OPC) to correct for light source fluctuations, thereby securing sufficient linearity (R2 > 0.99) for quantitative analysis.

2.4. Concentration Calculation Model

The concentrations of TOC and NO3-N were derived using the absorbance values at specific wavelengths processed through OPC and BinInterp. The calculation models are based on the following equations:
TOCconcentration = (Abs254 × CTOC,254 + Abs230 × CTOC,230) × RTOC
NO3-Nconcentration = (Abs230 × CNO3,230 + Abs254 × CNO3,254) × RNO3
Here, Abs254 and Abs230 represent the absorbance values at 254 nm and 230 nm, respectively. The empirical constants and ratio factors used in these equations are summarized in Table 1, where the ratio factors (RTOC and RNO3) serve as slope correction coefficients derived from the calibration curves to minimize the deviation between the estimated and actual concentrations.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. UV Spectrum Analysis and Derivation of Calculation Equations for TOC and NO3-N Standard Solutions Using Commercial Equipment

In this study, absorbance spectra measured from 190 nm to 390 nm were first analyzed using the commercial Agilent Cary 60 spectrophotometer, varying the concentrations of TOC and NO3-N standard samples with a step size of 2 nm and an integration time of 0.1 s.
Distilled water (DI) was used as the standard sample for 0 mg/L concentrations of TOC and NO3-N, and TOC standard samples of 2 mg/L, 5 mg/L, 10 mg/L, and 20 mg/L, as well as NO3-N standard samples of 1 mg/L, 2.5 mg/L, 5 mg/L, and 10 mg/L, were used.
As shown in Figure 3a,b, it was confirmed that the absorbance increased with increasing standard sample concentrations at wavelengths below 300 nm for TOC and below 240 nm for NO3-N. Figure 3c,d show the normalized TOC and NO3-N absorbance spectra (excluding DI) between 0 and 1. Normalization is a spectroscopic analysis method frequently used to identify major changes in spectra according to changes in external factors. As can be seen in Figure 3c,d, a common characteristic of TOC and NO3-N is that the width of absorption peaks existing around 200 nm tends to broaden as the concentration increases. This broadening effect was particularly evident in higher concentration ranges (e.g., from 10 to 20 mg/L for TOC and from 5 to 10 mg/L for NO3-N). Furthermore, it was confirmed that the absorbance changes abruptly at 210–230 nm and 230–260 nm for TOC, and at 210–230 nm for NO3-N.
When comparing the normalized absorbance spectra of TOC (20 mg/L) and NO3-N (5 mg/L), the two spectra exhibit similar shapes below 220 nm, indicating spectral overlap.
To more accurately confirm appropriate wavelength ranges and absorption peaks for each item, non-linear curve fitting was performed, and the results are illustrated in Figure 4. As a result of non-linear curve fitting, three absorption peaks appeared for TOC (200 nm, 230 nm, and 280 nm) and two for NO3-N (200 nm and 220 nm).
For NO3-N, since absorption peaks do not exist at wavelengths above 240 nm, it is useful to utilize absorbance at wavelengths above 240 nm for TOC concentration calculations. Additionally, for NO3-N, since two peaks that also appear in TOC coexist, care should be taken in selecting wavelengths suitable for NO3-N concentration calculations. In particular, as shown in Figure 4a, it was confirmed that an optical window exists between 240 and 260 nm, where absorption wavelengths independent of other absorption peaks can be selected.
Figure 5 illustrates the relationship between concentration and absorbance intensity measured at specific wavelengths for TOC and NO3-N standard solutions, referring to the above non-linear curve fitting results. In particular, the absorbance for TOC was evaluated at 230 nm and 254 nm, while that for NO3-N was assessed at 220 nm and 230 nm. The solid lines (blue and green) in each figure represent the linear curve fitting results between concentration and absorbance intensity; the linearity between absorbance and concentration can be confirmed through these lines, as summarized in Table 2.
Changes in absorbance intensity relative to concentration changes show relatively larger slopes at shorter wavelengths (TOC 230 nm and NO3-N 220 nm). As indicated by the non-linear curve fitting results (Figure 4), absorption at a wavelength of 230 nm coexists in both NO3-N and TOC absorption regions, resulting in similar slope values between the two calibration curves.
The linear correlation derived from changes in absorbance at specific wavelengths relative to the standard sample concentration is shown in Table 2. According to these results, it is appropriate to use absorbances at 230 nm and 254 nm for TOC and NO3-N concentration calculations.

3.2. Development and Data Analysis of Optical Detection Sensor Prototype (HASM-4000)

In this section, we describe the analysis of absorption spectra using HASM-4000, developed by applying a single optical path (1D-array optical detector) to develop a sensor-type spectrophotometric device.
HASM-4000, which is structurally different from the Cary 60, measures blank (air or DI) first, and then separately measures the target substance (sample) and calculates the absorbance. Figure 6 shows the absorbance spectra measured and calculated using the Cary 60 and HASM-4000 for DI and mixed solutions. Relatively larger noise signals can be observed in the HASM-4000 absorbance spectrum, necessitating research on data processing and analysis techniques that can reduce noise.

3.2.1. Optical Power Compensation (OPC)

Although emitted light can be changed to make it similar to parallel light, and external light can be reduced mechanically using diffusers or pinholes, correction is needed for changes in the intensity of light emitted from the light source over time between blank (DI) and mixed sample measurement stages. As mentioned earlier, spectrophotometric equipment such as the Cary 60 calculates absorbance by simultaneously measuring the blank/sample, but HASM-4000 sequentially conducts these measurements in two steps. Even excellent light sources generally have intensity fluctuations over time.
To compensate for such light source fluctuations, a UV photodiode (200–400 nm, JES1ISZ, Laser Components, Olching, Germany) was installed in front of the light source to measure the intensity of light emitted from the source. The measured light intensity was used to compensate for the transmitted light intensity in the 200–400 nm range, considering the light source’s irradiation spectrum and the spectrometer’s wavelength-dependent responsivity, after which the sample absorbance was calculated.
Figure 7 shows absorbance spectra before non-optical power compensation (NOPC) and after optical power compensation (OPC), when applying light intensity compensation to RawData measured from samples, and absorbance changes over measurement time for two specific wavelengths (λ1: 230 nm and λ2: 254 nm). Although differences before/after compensation are difficult to distinguish in spectra and along the time axis, as shown in Figure 8 as a histogram, it is confirmed that absorbance values concentrate slightly more around the mean value when the OPC process is applied, based on the standard deviation of a normal distribution.
The effect of OPC is minimal because the optical power changes in the light source have relatively small fluctuations at the average output. When the light source is unstable, the OPC effect is expected to appear distinctly.

3.2.2. Data Processing and Correction Results: Moving Average (MAvg) and Binning–Interpolation (BinInterp)

Moving Average (MAvg) and Binning and Interpolation techniques are generally used for absorbance correction and were employed in this study. MAvg was applied to the absorbance spectra because the phenomenon of transmission spectrum shifting (spectral distortion) can occur depending on avg_size, while BinInterp was applied to transmission spectra because it can prevent the distortion of wavelength information.
In this study, a 2500 × 2 data array, identical to RawData, was reconstructed for the Binning/Interpolation application. The spectral data, originally consisting of 2500 points, were reduced by a factor of 6 through the Binning process (averaging every 6 adjacent pixels, corresponding to approximately 2.14 nm). To compensate for this data reduction, Interpolation was applied to the binned data in this study to convert it to a 2500 × 2 data array.
Figure 9 shows the results when RawData, MAvg, and BinInterp were applied. Compared to RawData, the other spectra exhibit a broadening phenomenon in the transmission spectrum. However, in the case of MAvg, it can be confirmed that wavelength distortion occurred clearly (indicated by black arrows) compared to RawData. Therefore, in this study, data were processed to enable absorbance calculation after applying BinInterp to the transmission spectrum.

3.2.3. Result Analysis

The absorbance spectra for various standard samples and mixed samples were analyzed by applying optical power compensation (OPC), Moving Average (MAvg), and Binning/Interpolation (BinInterp). Figure 10 shows the absorbance spectrum analysis results according to the following combinations of individual techniques:
(a)
When OPC was not applied;
(b)
When OPC was applied;
(c)
When OPC and MAvg were applied;
(d)
When OPC and BinInterp were applied.
The samples used were mixed with TOC (mg/L), NO3-N (mg/L), and turbidity (NTU) concentrations of 20-0-0, 0-20-0, 0-0-20, 20-20-0, and 20-20-20.
As mentioned earlier, in the red ovals shown in (a) and (b), it is difficult to distinguish signals from noise with light compensation alone, but signal values were relatively increased and noise width decreased. In the black line within the blue ovals of (c) and (d), changes in spectral trends can be observed. It was found that the absorbance spectra from the application of OPC and BinInterp showed distinctly improved noise compared to other combinations.
To quantitatively validate this noise reduction performance, we evaluated the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) using standard solutions. As shown in Figure 11, the analysis yielded SNR values of 34.4 dB and 41.7 dB for TOC concentrations of 5 mg/L and 20 mg/L, respectively, while for NO3-N, the SNR values were 24.0 dB and 35.0 dB at 5 mg/L and 20 mg/L, respectively. These results confirm that the combined application of OPC and Binning–Interpolation effectively suppresses noise (>1 dB threshold), ensuring stable measurement signals even in lower concentration ranges.
Figure 12 presents the results of linear regression analysis based on stable measurement signals, excluding transient noise caused by bubbles during sample injection. The analysis confirmed excellent linearity (R2 > 0.99) for both TOC and NO3-N, indicating that the estimated concentrations derived from the sensor are highly correlated with the actual concentrations. Although there are some differences between the actual and estimated concentrations, these can be adjusted by modifying the TOC and NO3 ratio values in the concentration calculation equations.
To preliminarily evaluate the applicability of the proposed calibration model under real-world environmental conditions, ten river water samples were additionally collected from national water quality monitoring sites in Korea. Actual concentrations were analyzed using a certified laboratory analyzer (SHIMADZU TOC-L (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) for TOC and HACH DR3900 (Hach, Loveland, CO, USA) for NO3-N), which were then processed using HASM-4000 to derive estimated concentrations (TOC_exp and NO3-N_exp) based on the UV absorbance preprocessing and regression equations established in this study. Figure 13 shows a comparison between actual and estimated concentrations, demonstrating reasonable consistency and yielding determination coefficients of R2 = 0.819 for TOC and R2 = 0.868 for NO3-N. These preliminary results indicate that the optical–computational measurement approach has potential for application in natural river water matrices; however, broader validation across diverse hydrological and seasonal conditions is required to further substantiate field-scale reliability.

3.2.4. Measurement Uncertainty and Chemometric Correction

To address the issue of overlapping absorption spectra between TOC and NO3-N, we employed a Multivariate Linear Regression (MLR) model (Equations (3) and (4)). This chemometric approach mathematically corrects for spectral interference by combining the absorbances at the primary (λmain) and interfering (λinterfering) wavelengths with empirical constants derived from standard mixtures. This approach effectively separates the overlapping signals, allowing for accurate quantification even in the presence of spectral interference.
Furthermore, to quantify the noise reduction performance and assess measurement uncertainty, we evaluated the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) using standard solutions. As shown in Figure 13, the analysis yielded SNR values of 34.4 dB and 41.7 dB for TOC concentrations of 5 mg/L and 20 mg/L, respectively, while for NO3-N, the SNR values were 24.0 dB and 35.0 dB at 5 mg/L and 20 mg/L, respectively. These results demonstrate that the integrated OPC and Binning–Interpolation algorithms effectively suppress noise (>1 dB threshold), ensuring stable measurement signals.
Based on this SNR data, the measurement uncertainty was evaluated. For 5 mg/L samples, the measurement standard deviation σ was calculated as approximately 0.12 mg/L for TOC and 0.29 mg/L for NO3-N. These values correspond to a measurement uncertainty of approximately ±2.4% (TOC) and ±5.8% (NO3-N), which falls well within the acceptable error margin (±5–10%) typically required for in situ water quality sensors.

4. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

In this study, the sensor-type optical analytical equipment HASM-4000—capable of simultaneously analyzing TOC and NO3-N and suitable for underwater immersion and portability—was manufactured, and optical measurements were performed on actual TOC and NO3-N standard samples using the device. Measurement data were obtained as light emitted from the light source passed through samples placed in a 10 mm optical path, and light incident on the spectrometer was dispersed into transmission spectrum information in the 200–1050 nm region. After data preprocessing via optical power compensation (OPC) and Binning and Interpolation (BinInterp), sample absorbance spectra were derived according to the Beer–Lambert law, which were used to determine TOC and NO3-N concentration calculation equations. By confirming a high R2 value of 0.999 between actual sample concentrations and experimental sample concentrations, TOC and NO3-N measurement capabilities were verified using standard samples with HASM-4000. Additionally, preliminary validation using actual river water samples showed promising correlations (R2 > 0.8), suggesting the method’s feasibility for field application.
However, the correlations observed in the pure standard samples could not be confirmed in mixed samples of turbidity with TOC and NO3-N, likely due to the optical measurement limitations of the HASM-4000 equipment, which was designed with a 10 mm optical path. To quantitatively assess the impact of pathlength on scattering interference, we conducted a supplementary experiment comparing absorbance spectra using 1 mm and 10 mm pathlengths (see Supplementary Information, Figure S1). The results demonstrated that reducing the pathlength to 1 mm decreased the turbidity-induced absorbance signal to approximately 6.5% of that observed at 10 mm. This confirms that shortening the optical path is a physically effective strategy for mitigating scattering interference.
To overcome these limitations in field application, future research is needed to develop new concentration calculation methods that utilize absorbance ratio (AR) values of λ12 and λ21 and have non-linearity according to concentration for constants used in the final calculation equation.
Furthermore, based on the findings from our supplementary pathlength experiment, we plan to transition the optical path from 10 mm to 5 mm and incorporate collimating lenses to parallelize the emitted light, along with focusing lenses to collect the transmitted light. Moreover, replacing currently used self-manufactured diffusers and pinholes with commercial products for additional research is expected to improve absorbance below 250 nm and enhance performance. While this study confirmed the sensor’s potential through standard and preliminary field samples, further research is needed to conduct comprehensive field validation across diverse hydrological conditions to identify and mitigate interference effects leading to its commercialization. In addition to standard and synthetic solutions, preliminary testing using ten river water samples demonstrated reasonable consistency between actual laboratory-measured concentrations and sensor-estimated concentrations (R2 = 0.819 for TOC; R2 = 0.868 for NO3-N). These findings suggest that the optical–computational framework has potential for field application; however, comprehensive validation across diverse water bodies, seasonal variations, and matrix conditions remains essential for reliable deployment.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/w17243586/s1, Figure S1: Absorbance Analysis of Turbidity Standard Solutions at Optical Pathlengths of 1 mm and 10 mm.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K. and C.Y.; methodology, M.K., S.P., B.P. and C.Y.; validation, M.K., B.P. and S.K.; investigation, H.K.; resources, H.K.; data curation, S.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K. and S.P.; writing—review and editing, T.W., S.K., J.J. and C.Y.; visualization, S.P. and T.W.; supervision, B.P.; project administration, M.K.; funding acquisition, M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Korea Water Cluster through the 2025 Support Project for the Leading Materials, Parts and Equipment (MPE) (202502-0101), and by the Energy Demand Management Core Technology Development Project (RS-2025-02307821) funded by the Ministry of Climate, Energy and Environment and the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that helped improve the quality of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Seongwook Park, Byoungsun Park, Hongseok Kim were employed by the company HSKorea Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors declare that this study received funding from Korea Water Cluster. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
TOCTotal organic carbon
NO3-NNitrate nitrogen
UVUltraviolet
OPCOptical power compensation
NOPCNon-optical power compensation
MAvgMoving average
BinInterpBinning and interpolation
DIDistilled water

References

  1. Xue, J.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, M. A review of non-point source water pollution modeling for the urban-rural transitional areas of China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 32706–32721. [Google Scholar]
  2. Haas, J.C.; Birk, S. Trends in Austrian groundwater—Climate or human impact? J. Hydrol. X 2023, 19, 100153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Water Environment Information System. Available online: https://water.nier.go.kr/web (accessed on 14 December 2025).
  4. Ministry of Environment (MOE). 2025 Plan for Installation and Operation of the National Water Environment Monitoring Network; Ministry of Environment: Sejong City, Republic of Korea, 2025.
  5. YSI (Xylem). UV-Vis Spectrophotometric Sensors for Wastewater Treatment Applications; Technical Note; YSI: Yellow Springs, OH, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  6. American Public Health Association; American Water Works Association; Water Environment Federation. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 24th ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yu, J.; Kim, H.; Park, N. Recent Measurement Technologies for Water Quality Monitoring in Wastewater Treatment Plants. J. Korean Soc. Environ. Eng. 2019, 41, 745–758. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pellerin, B.A.; Bergamaschi, B.A. Optical sensors for water quality. LakeLine 2014, 34, 15–18. [Google Scholar]
  9. Thomas, O.; Burgess, C. UV-Visible Spectrophotometry of Water and Wastewater, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rieger, L.; Langergraber, G.; Thomann, M.; Fleischmann, N.; Siegrist, H. Spectral in-situ analysis of NO2, NO3, COD, DOC and TSS in the effluent of a WWTP. Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 50, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Tipping, E.; Corbishley, H.T.; Koprivnjak, J.F.; Lapworth, D.J.; Miller, M.P.; Vincent, C.D.; Hamilton-Taylor, J. Quantification of natural DOM from UV absorption at two wavelengths. Environ. Chem. 2009, 6, 472–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kufelnicki, A.; Jaciubek-Rosińska, M. Determination of nitrate ion concentration via UV absorption and fluorescence. Przegląd Elektrotechniczny 2012, 88, 218–220. [Google Scholar]
  13. Causse, J.; Thomas, O.; Jung, A.V.; Thomas, M.F. Direct DOC and nitrate determination in water using dual pathlength and second derivative UV spectrophotometry. Water Res. 2017, 108, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lal, S.; Jadhav, P.; Hwang, H.; Kadam, P.; Narasimhan, M.; Roy, N.; Pawar, S.; Lahane, B. A review on electrochemical and optical sensors for nitrate detection in water. J. Water Process Eng. 2023, 51, 103420. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee, S.; Kim, K. Water Quality Measurement Method and Apparatus Using an Optical Sensor. Korea Patent No. KR100622074B1, 14 September 2006. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim, C.; Eom, J.B.; Jung, S.; Ji, T. Detection of Organic Compounds in Water by an Optical Absorbance Method. Sensors 2016, 16, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, J.; Pan, S.; Bian, J.; Jiang, W. An Improved-Bagging Model for Water Chemical Oxygen Demand Measurements Using UV-Vis Spectroscopy. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 161834–161845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shi, Z.; Chow, C.W.K.; Fabris, R.; Liu, J.; Sawade, E. Evaluation of the impact of suspended particles on the UV absorbance at 254 nm (UV254) measurements using a submersible UV-Vis spectrophotometer. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 12576–12586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Experimental setup utilizing the Agilent Cary 60 UV-Vis spectrophotometer: (a) external view of the equipment and (b) schematic diagram of the optical system featuring the Xenon flash lamp source and dual-beam configuration.
Figure 1. Experimental setup utilizing the Agilent Cary 60 UV-Vis spectrophotometer: (a) external view of the equipment and (b) schematic diagram of the optical system featuring the Xenon flash lamp source and dual-beam configuration.
Water 17 03586 g001
Figure 2. Design schematic of HASM-4000 developed by HSKorea Co., Ltd.
Figure 2. Design schematic of HASM-4000 developed by HSKorea Co., Ltd.
Water 17 03586 g002
Figure 3. Absorbance spectra (top) and normalized absorbance spectra (bottom) of standard solutions measured using Cary 60 for (a,c) TOC and (b,d) NO3-N.
Figure 3. Absorbance spectra (top) and normalized absorbance spectra (bottom) of standard solutions measured using Cary 60 for (a,c) TOC and (b,d) NO3-N.
Water 17 03586 g003
Figure 4. Non-linear curve fitting results for the normalized absorbance spectra of (a) TOC 2.0 mg/L and (b) NO3-N 5.0 mg/L standard solutions.
Figure 4. Non-linear curve fitting results for the normalized absorbance spectra of (a) TOC 2.0 mg/L and (b) NO3-N 5.0 mg/L standard solutions.
Water 17 03586 g004
Figure 5. Absorbance spectra at specific wavelengths as a function of concentration for each standard solution: (a) TOC absorbance measured at 230 nm and 254 nm; (b) NO3-N absorbance measured at 220 nm and 230 nm.
Figure 5. Absorbance spectra at specific wavelengths as a function of concentration for each standard solution: (a) TOC absorbance measured at 230 nm and 254 nm; (b) NO3-N absorbance measured at 220 nm and 230 nm.
Water 17 03586 g005
Figure 6. Absorbance spectra of (a) DI and (b) mixed solutions containing TOC, NO3-N, and turbidity measured using Cary 60 and HASM-4000.
Figure 6. Absorbance spectra of (a) DI and (b) mixed solutions containing TOC, NO3-N, and turbidity measured using Cary 60 and HASM-4000.
Water 17 03586 g006
Figure 7. Absorbance before and after OPC correction: (a) absorbance spectra as a function of wavelength and (b) time-dependent absorbance measured at 230 nm and 254 nm.
Figure 7. Absorbance before and after OPC correction: (a) absorbance spectra as a function of wavelength and (b) time-dependent absorbance measured at 230 nm and 254 nm.
Water 17 03586 g007
Figure 8. Normal distribution of absorbance values at 230 nm and 254 nm before and after OPC correction.
Figure 8. Normal distribution of absorbance values at 230 nm and 254 nm before and after OPC correction.
Water 17 03586 g008
Figure 9. Transmittance intensity as a function of wavelength for raw data, as well as MAvg and BinInterp applied data.
Figure 9. Transmittance intensity as a function of wavelength for raw data, as well as MAvg and BinInterp applied data.
Water 17 03586 g009
Figure 10. The absorbance spectrum analysis results according to the following combinations of individual techniques: (a) none, (b) OPC, (c) OPC and MAvg, and (d) OPC and BinInterp.
Figure 10. The absorbance spectrum analysis results according to the following combinations of individual techniques: (a) none, (b) OPC, (c) OPC and MAvg, and (d) OPC and BinInterp.
Water 17 03586 g010
Figure 11. Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) analysis histograms for TOC and NO3-N standard samples after applying OPC and BinInterp: (a) 5 mg/L of TOC, (b) 20 mg/L of TOC, (c) 5 mg/L of NO3-N, and (d) 20 mg/L of NO3-N.
Figure 11. Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) analysis histograms for TOC and NO3-N standard samples after applying OPC and BinInterp: (a) 5 mg/L of TOC, (b) 20 mg/L of TOC, (c) 5 mg/L of NO3-N, and (d) 20 mg/L of NO3-N.
Water 17 03586 g011
Figure 12. Linear regression analysis between actual and estimated concentrations for (a) TOC and (b) NO3-N based on stable measurement data (R2 > 0.99).
Figure 12. Linear regression analysis between actual and estimated concentrations for (a) TOC and (b) NO3-N based on stable measurement data (R2 > 0.99).
Water 17 03586 g012
Figure 13. Comparison between actual and estimated concentrations for TOC and NO3-N using field samples.
Figure 13. Comparison between actual and estimated concentrations for TOC and NO3-N using field samples.
Water 17 03586 g013
Table 1. Empirical constants and ratio factors for TOC and NO3-N concentration calculation.
Table 1. Empirical constants and ratio factors for TOC and NO3-N concentration calculation.
ParameterSymbolValueDescription
TOC ConstantsCTOC,2541Weight for absorbance at 254 nm
CTOC,2300.00529Empirical constant for absorbance ratio (λ254/λ230)
RTOC60.6Slope correction factor (ratio)
NO3-N ConstantsCNO3,2301Weight for absorbance at 230 nm
CNO3,2354−3.5189Empirical constant for absorbance ratio (λ230/λ254)
RNO3-N23.2Slope correction factor (ratio)
Table 2. Linear correlation equations between absorbance and concentration.
Table 2. Linear correlation equations between absorbance and concentration.
Equationy = a + bx
ItemsNO3-NTOC
Wavelength (nm)220230230254
Intercept0.0285 ± 0.0268−0.0003 ± 0.0010−0.0021 ± 0.0052−0.0021 ± 0.0018
Slope0.2543 ± 0.00520.0600 ± 0.00020.0721 ± 0.00050.0185 ± 0.0002
R20.99871.00000.99990.9997
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, M.; Park, S.; Park, B.; Kim, H.; Woo, T.; Kim, S.; Jang, J.; Yoo, C. Optical Analysis Based on UV Absorption Spectrum for Monitoring Total Organic Carbon and Nitrate Nitrogen in River Water. Water 2025, 17, 3586. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17243586

AMA Style

Kim M, Park S, Park B, Kim H, Woo T, Kim S, Jang J, Yoo C. Optical Analysis Based on UV Absorption Spectrum for Monitoring Total Organic Carbon and Nitrate Nitrogen in River Water. Water. 2025; 17(24):3586. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17243586

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Minhan, Seongwook Park, Byoungsun Park, Hongseok Kim, Taeyong Woo, Sangyoun Kim, Junghee Jang, and Changkyoo Yoo. 2025. "Optical Analysis Based on UV Absorption Spectrum for Monitoring Total Organic Carbon and Nitrate Nitrogen in River Water" Water 17, no. 24: 3586. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17243586

APA Style

Kim, M., Park, S., Park, B., Kim, H., Woo, T., Kim, S., Jang, J., & Yoo, C. (2025). Optical Analysis Based on UV Absorption Spectrum for Monitoring Total Organic Carbon and Nitrate Nitrogen in River Water. Water, 17(24), 3586. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17243586

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop