Next Article in Journal
Karstological Significance of the Study on Deep Fracture–Vug Reservoirs in the Tarim Basin Based on Paleo-Modern Comparison
Previous Article in Journal
From Carbon Sinks to Carbon Sources: A Regime Shift Induced by the Desiccation of Floodplain Lakes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effects of Inorganic Carbon and Irradiance on the Photosynthetic Performance and Growth of the Macroalga Sargassum horneri

1
Department of Aquaculture, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung City 20224, Taiwan
2
Center of Excellence for the Ocean, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung City 20224, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2025, 17(24), 3528; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17243528
Submission received: 19 August 2025 / Revised: 27 November 2025 / Accepted: 5 December 2025 / Published: 12 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Biodiversity and Functionality of Aquatic Ecosystems)

Abstract

Sargassum horneri is a highly productive macroalgal species capable of assimilating dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and converting CO2 into carbohydrates, making it a promising solution for carbon capture and biomass enhancement. Owing to its wide distribution and natural abundance, the utilization of S. horneri may help mitigate rising oceanic CO2 concentrations. This study evaluated the combined effects of inorganic carbon availability (2000, 4000, and 8000 μM NaHCO3) and irradiance (100, 150, and 200 µmol photons m−2 s−1) on photosynthetic performance and growth across short-term (24 h) and long-term (4-week) experimental trials. Carbon enrichment and light intensity interacted to significantly influence growth and carbon assimilation. The highest growth rate (35.83 ± 3.95%) was observed under 8000 μM DIC (0.75 g L−1) at 200 µmol photons m−2 s−1, corresponding to an optimal mean growth condition of 19 ± 0.04% (p < 0.05). These findings demonstrate that elevated inorganic carbon enhances photosynthetic efficiency by supplying sufficient substrate for carbon fixation, thereby supporting the feasibility of Sargassum horneri as a viable species for CO2 absorption and carbon capture applications.

1. Introduction

Rising levels of anthropogenic carbon emissions have significantly altered global biogeochemical processes, with the world’s oceans absorbing a substantial proportion of excess atmospheric CO2 [1]. This influx of dissolved carbon directly influences carbonate system dynamics, water chemistry, and the ecological interactions of marine organisms, including Sargassum horneri, a pelagic brown macroalga of ecological and functional importance [2]. S. horneri plays a vital role in coastal ecosystems by contributing to primary productivity, enhancing water quality, and influencing parameters such as alkalinity, dissolved oxygen, and temperature regulation [3].
Native to the northwestern Pacific, S. horneri displays a broad biogeographical range and frequently forms large drifting mats, commonly referred to as “golden tides.” These floating assemblages serve as nursery grounds and feeding habitats for diverse coastal species, while also impacting community structures and ecosystem function [4,5,6]. Numerous studies highlight S. horneri as a highly functional macroalga rich in sulfated polysaccharides with notable anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antitumor, and antiallergenic properties, demonstrating proven benefits in aquaculture species such as Litopenaeus vannamei through enhanced growth and immunity [7]. Brown algae, including S. horneri, have also been identified as effective bioindicators of heavy metal pollution [1], and are widely recognized for their applications in feed, fertilizers, biofuel production, and commercially valuable bioactive compounds such as fucoidan, fucoxanthin, and alginates [8,9,10]. These traits indicate S. horneri to be a promising macroalgal species for sustainable cultivation and utilization in environmental mitigation and biotechnological development [1,8].
Sargassum horneri exhibits high productivity and rapid growth, supported by buoyant gas-filled vesicles that maintain thallus flotation and promote extensive dispersal. Individuals can reach up to 5 m in length within a year [5]. Growth and productivity are influenced by environmental factors such as light intensity and quality, temperature, and nutrient availability. Photosynthesis drives carbon assimilation and biomass accumulation, converting light energy into chemical energy stored as glucose derived from inorganic carbon uptake [11,12]. Brown algae possess characteristic pigment suites that include chlorophyll a, chlorophyll c, fucoxanthin, β-carotene, and xanthophylls which exhibit broad absorption spectra and enhance light harvesting efficiency [13,14].
Photosynthetic capacity in macroalgae is governed by the Photosynthetic Electron Transport Chain (PETC), with performance typically quantified through the electron transport rate (ETR). Electron flow through Photosystems II and I generate the proton gradient necessary for ATP synthesis, while NADPH production supports carbon fixation via the Calvin–Benson cycle [15,16]. In dark-adapted states, CO2 assimilation is mediated within the chloroplast stroma by the enzyme Rubisco (ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase), which catalyzes carbon fixation through the C3 metabolic pathway [17]. Marine macroalgae, including S. horneri, have evolved Carbon-Concentrating Mechanisms (CCMs) that enhance intracellular CO2 availability. These mechanisms include enzymatic conversion of bicarbonate (HCO3) to CO2 and carbonic anhydrase activity that elevates CO2 concentration near the Rubisco active site [15]. Some studies further report the involvement of C4-associated enzymes—such as pyruvate or orthophosphate dikinase (PPDK), which may contribute to photoprotection and mitigate photoinhibition under high-light stress [18,19,20,21]. Together, these adaptations regulate photosynthetic efficiency and support the ecological success of S. horneri, while also presenting opportunities for industrial-scale biomass production.
To better understand the interactive effects of light intensity and inorganic carbon availability on S. horneri, the present study conducted both a short-term (24 h; Trial 1) and long-term (4 weeks; Trial 2) experiment. The objectives were as follows:
  • To evaluate the influence of inorganic carbon on Photosystem II function and photosynthetic efficiency;
  • To quantify growth performance and biomass accumulation in response to varying light and carbon conditions;
  • To assess how DIC and total alkalinity influence CO2 assimilation in Sargassum horneri.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design

The study consisted of two sequential experimental phases: a short-term trial (24 h) to assess initial physiological responses and methodological feasibility, followed by a long-term trial conducted over four weeks. A 3 × 3 × 3 factorial design was implemented using three inorganic carbon concentrations (2000, 4000, and 8000 µmol/kg NaHCO3) and three irradiance levels (100, 150, and 200 µmol photons m−2 s−1), a total of 9 treatments replicated three times (n = 27). This design allowed assessment of the interactive effects of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) availability and light intensity on photosynthetic performance, carbon assimilation, and growth. Data collection encompassed chlorophyll fluorescence measurements and analyses of DIC, pH, and total alkalinity (TA).

2.2. Experimental Sampling and Procedure

Naturally occurring Sargassum horneri thalli were collected from the northern coast of Taiwan in April 2024. Samples were transported to the National Taiwan Ocean University Aquatic Center Laboratory, cleaned of epiphytes and debris, and acclimated for seven days in a 1 m3 fiberglass tank maintained at 20 °C under continuous aeration and ambient light. Experimental treatments consisted of 30.0 ± 0.5 g fresh weight portions placed individually into nine 20 L culture vessels maintained at 20 °C with continuous aeration and artificial LED illumination. PES nutrient medium was added at a ratio of 30 mL per 1000 mL seawater. Irradiance was quantified using a UPRtek MK350S handheld spectrometer, and target light levels (100, 150, 200 μmol photons m−2 s−1) were applied with a ±10% allowable variance. Inorganic carbon treatments were prepared by mixing Na2CO3 and NaHCO3 in a 1:2 mass ratio, at 0, 0.35, and 0.75 g L−1, corresponding to nominal DIC levels of 2000, 4000, and 8000 µmol/kg, respectively. Each week, temperature, pH, salinity, and dissolved oxygen were measured using a WQC-30 portable water quality meter (Hach, Ireland). At each sampling point (24 h for the short-term trial and weekly for the long-term trial), 250 mL water samples were collected, stored at –4 °C, and used for DIC and TA analyses. Following each weekly sampling, culture media were replaced with fresh natural seawater supplemented with PES medium, following the procedures described in [20,22].

2.3. Chlorophyll Fluorescence

The photosynthetic efficiency was evaluated using a portable Diving-PAM pulse-amplitude-modulated fluorometer (Heinz Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany, 2019) with WinControl 3.30 software. Samples were dark-adapted for 20 min before measurements.
Equation (1). Maximum Quantum Yield of PSII
F v F m = F m F o F m
where F0 is the minimal fluorescence yield, Fₘ is the maximal fluorescence under a saturating pulse, and Fᵥ (variable fluorescence) represents the reduction state of PSII reaction centers. A saturating pulse of 809–814 µmol photons m−2 s−1 for 1 s was applied to obtain maximum fluorescence values following [23].
Equation (2). Relative Electron Transport Rate
r E T R = P A R × Y I I × 0.84 × 0.5
where PAR is photosynthetically active radiation, Y(II) is the effective quantum yield of PSII, 0.84 represents the assumed light absorptance, and 0.5 denotes equal energy distribution between PSI and PSII.
Light-response (rapid light) curves were generated to determine rETR, ETRmax, and related photosynthetic parameters following methods described in [21,24].

2.4. Inorganic Carbon Analysis

DIC and TA were quantified at the conclusion of each experimental trial, as described in [25,26,27,28]. Water samples were collected in 250 mL polyethylene bottles, preserved with 200 µL HgCl2, and stored at 4 °C until analysis.
Equation (3). Dissolved Inorganic Carbon
D I C = C O 2 a q + H 2 C O 3 + H C O 3 + [ C O 3 2 ]
For total organic carbon (TOC) analysis, 150 mL amber glass bottles were filled with culture water and acidified with three drops of H2SO4 to enhance conductivity. TA was determined via titration following standard carbonate chemistry protocols [24,29], enabling conversion among bicarbonate, carbonate, and hydroxide species. All analyses were conducted at a controlled temperature of 20 °C and pH 8.
Algal biomass from each treatment (n = 27) was dried to a constant weight at 60 °C and homogenized for elemental analysis using a CHN analyzer (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) to determine tissue carbon content pursual to [30,31].
Equation (4). Carbon Concentration
C = g L g L 1

2.5. Biomass and Growth Determination

Growth was assessed by measuring initial (W1) and final (W2) wet weights of algal samples following [31,32].
Equation (5). Relative Growth Rate (RGR)
R G R = ln W 2 ln W 1 Δ t ( d a y 1 )
Equation (6). Growth Percentage (%)
% G r o w t h = W 2 W 1 W 2 × 100 %
Growth rates were derived for each replicate under all light and carbon treatments and averaged for each treatment level.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS v26.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Chicago, IL, USA). A two-way ANOVA was performed to assess the main and interactive effects of irradiance and inorganic carbon concentration on measured parameters. Tukey’s post hoc test was used to identify significant pairwise differences at p ≤ 0.05. Normality and homogeneity of variance were evaluated using Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests, respectively. All data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and statistically significant differences are denoted by lowercase superscript letters.

3. Results and Discussion

Given an increased interest in marine vegetation acting as carbon sinks for anthropogenic CO2, this experiment found Sargassum horneri to be highly useful for the uptake of dissolved inorganic carbon for utilization and conversion into functional organic compounds for enhanced biomass and growth [33,34].

3.1. The Photosynthetic Performance of S. horneri

The interactions of light intensity and inorganic carbon influenced growth with an optimal yield condition (Table 1), as shown by L2_C3 or (150 μmol photons m−2 s−1) and high carbon (8000 μmol/kg); a similar trend with dissolved oxygen O2 levels (Figure 2b) ranging from approximately 6.9–9.4 mgL−1 depicting a higher photosynthetic O2 evolution was also shown under both higher light intensity and moderate carbon concentration, indicating a greater efficiency of Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCSU) subject to varying environmental conditions leading to adaptation strategies [15,35]. Although salinity levels remained consistent among all treatments, photoinhibition was shown at the highest light level of 200 μmol photons m−2 s−1; likewise, the treatment conditions with higher amounts of inorganic carbon indicate that S. horneri benefits from carbon enrichment coupled with moderate irradiance; comparably, floating algae require a greater exposure to high levels of light and temperature with lower levels of dissolved CO2, which may be associated with the activation of the C4 pathway [36,37].
Significant variability was observed among treatments in total organic carbon (TOC), pH, dissolved oxygen (O2), salinity, biomass (Wt.), and maximum electron transport rate (ETRmax). TOC values ranged from 0.34 ± 0.07 to 0.62 ± 0.004, with the highest concentration recorded under treatment L1_C1, which differed significantly from the mid- and high-light carbon treatments (p < 0.05). pH remained generally elevated across all treatments (8.89–9.21), while O2 levels increased under higher carbon and irradiance conditions, reaching up to 9.43 ± 4.30 mgL−1 in L3_C3, indicating enhanced photosynthetic O2 evolution [37]. Biomass accumulation showed treatment-specific differences, with the greatest final wet weight observed in L2_C3 (5.14 ± 0.086 g), which was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than several low-light treatments. Maximum electron transport rates (ETRmax) ranged from (12.95 ± 1.69 to 20.08 ± 1.92), with peak values occurring under L2_C3, demonstrating that moderate irradiance paired with high levels of inorganic carbon promoted the highest photosynthetic performance (Figure 1). Generally, this trial indicates that intermediate light levels (L2) combined with elevated inorganic carbon levels (C3) produced the most favorable physiological and photosynthetic response in Sargassum horneri.
Growth in terms of biomass accumulation was statistically significant with the highest value determined at (L2_C3) or 150 m−2 s−1 8000 μmol/kg; comparably, the lowest was 5.14 ± 0.09 (L3_C2) or 200 m−2 s−1 4000 μmol/kg: 4.24 ± 0.37, indicating an ideal growth condition of moderate light couple with higher carbon input. The rETR increased asymptotically with rising PAR in all treatments, reflecting enhanced photochemical activity as photon availability increased. Algae grown under high-irradiance conditions (200 µmol photons m−2 s−1) consistently demonstrated the highest rETR values across the PAR range, indicating greater photosynthetic capacity and improved utilization of light energy.
Carbon enrichment further modulated photochemical efficiency, with 4000 and 8000 µmol/kg treatments supporting higher rETR at elevated PAR compared to 2000 µmol/kg. These trends reflect strong light-dependent enhancement of photosynthetic electron transport, with inorganic carbon playing a secondary but stimulatory role under high photon flux densities [37,38].
On completion of the short-term trial (24 h), the average carbon ratio of dried Sargassum horneri tissues remained relatively uniform across treatments (approximately 0.65–0.70; Figure 2a), with no statistically significant differences among the various light or inorganic carbon levels [39,40]. In contrast, dissolved oxygen (DO) levels exhibited greater variability among treatments (Figure 2b), ranging from approximately (6 to 10 mgL−1). The highest mean DO concentration (9.43 ± 4.30 mgL−1) occurred under 150 µmol photons m−2 s−1 and 8000 μmol/kg DIC, whereas the lowest value (6.93 ± 0.51 mgL−1) was observed under 200 µmol photons m−2 s−1 with 8000 μmol/kg DIC. The broad error range associated with the highest DO values suggests substantial metabolic fluctuation, potentially attributable to transient changes in photosynthetic activity. Conversely, the reduced DO production at the highest irradiance level may reflect photoinhibition or light-induced stress, which can limit oxygen evolution despite ample inorganic carbon availability [39,41].
Growth rate (Figure 3a) increased noticeably under higher irradiance and elevated inorganic carbon concentrations. The combination of 200 µmol photons m−2 s−1 and 8000 μmol/kg DIC (L3_C3) yielded the highest growth rate (~30%) (Table 2), representing a statistically significant enhancement relative to other treatments. This pattern indicates that increased carbon availability, when paired with high light, facilitates greater rates of carbon fixation and assimilation, thereby promoting more rapid biomass production [37].
Figure 3b further supports this trend, as higher irradiance and inorganic carbon levels resulted in increased organic carbon accumulation within algal tissues. This enhancement reflects elevated photosynthetic carbon assimilation and storage under carbon-enriched, high-light conditions. Conversely, lower organic carbon ratios under weak irradiance indicate reduced photosynthetic activity and slower buildup of organic reserves [42]. Together, these results demonstrate that stronger irradiance combined with high inorganic carbon availability maximizes both biomass accumulation and organic carbon storage, reinforcing the species’ capacity for effective carbon assimilation under enriched conditions.
Sargassum horneri demonstrated substantial photo physiological plasticity across the tested irradiance and inorganic carbon regimes. The stability of maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm; Figure 4a and Figure 5a) across treatments indicates that photosystem II (PSII) remained functionally robust, with no evidence of photoinhibition or stress-related decline. Enhanced ETRmax values under moderate to high irradiance (150–200 µmol photons m−2 s−1) combined with elevated inorganic carbon availability (4000–8000 µmol kg−1) reflect greater electron transport capacity and improved photochemical energy conversion efficiency. This irradiance–carbon combination likely represents an optimal physiological range supporting high photosynthetic performance and biomass accumulation in S. horneri [21].
ETRmax values (Figure 4b) increased from approximately 10 to 25 µmol photons m−2 s−1, with the highest rates consistently observed under moderate–high light and mid-to-high carbon availability. In contrast, the lowest ETRmax values (Figure 5b), denoted by the superscript (‘c’), occurred under low-light conditions (100 µmol photons m−2 s−1) despite moderate carbon supply (4000 µmol kg−1), indicating photon limitation. Collectively, these patterns confirm that ETRmax is a reliable indicator of the photosynthetic activity of PSII and that S. horneri relies exclusively on irradiance, with carbon enrichment providing secondary enhancement under sufficient light [43]. This outcome suggests that Sargassum horneri exhibits enhanced electron transport activity and therefore higher photosynthetic efficiency when both irradiance and inorganic carbon are available at moderate to high levels [37,44]. However, beyond this range, neither extremely high carbon concentrations nor further increases in light intensity produced additional gains in ETRmax, indicating the presence of a physiological saturation threshold in the photosynthetic apparatus of S. horneri [45]. Comparable trends have been reported in other macroalgae; for example, dissolved CO2 enrichment significantly enhanced pigment content and biomass accumulation in Colaconema formosanum when supplemented with 1 gL−1 inorganic carbon [20,22]. Such responses highlight the importance of environmental conditions in shaping algal photo-acclimation strategies [17,35].
Floating macroalgae, like S. horneri, often experience elevated light and temperature alongside relatively low dissolved CO2, conditions that may induce alternative carbon assimilation pathways such as enhanced C4 like metabolism to maintain efficient uptake and fixation [19,45]. Light is a dominant driver of biomass production in S.horneri with increases in RGR from the lowest to the highes light levels L1–L3 (Table 2) irrespective of carbon levels. Although some studies have argued that atmospheric CO2 influx is largely independent of photosynthetic carbon fixation, other analyses suggest that increases in external CO2 can stimulate carboxylation in C3 species until a saturation point is reached, beyond which photosynthetic efficiency declines due to biochemical limitations; indicating an altered carbon storage rather than rapid growth, by a higher carbon ratio at L1_C1 (Table 2) [28,29,46,47]. Further investigation into S. horneri’s photosynthetic capacities including responses to variable light spectra, fluctuating irradiance, and differing carbonate chemistry would provide valuable insights into its acclimation mechanisms [36,37]. Such research would not only advance understanding of its physiological ecology but also inform assessments of its stress tolerance, cultural suitability, and broader adaptive potential within dynamic marine environments [27,48].

3.2. The Effects of Inorganic Carbon on S. horneri Culture Medium

Variations in irradiance (100, 150, and 200 µmol photons m−2 s−1) and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC; 2000, 4000, and 8000 µM) produced measurable differences in total alkalinity (TA), pH, dissolved oxygen (O2), and salinity in the culture medium (Table 1). Notable fluctuations in pH and TA (Figure 6a,b) suggest dynamic carbonate system responses that may have influenced DIC availability, particularly through enhanced utilization of bicarbonate (HCO3) during dark-adapted and light-driven CO2 fixation (Figure 3a) [45]. These changes corresponded with increases in biomass, indicating a positive relationship between inorganic carbon enrichment and S. horneri growth.
DIC enrichment at 8000 µmol/kg produced the most consistent treatment effects across all irradiance levels, demonstrating a strong light × carbon interaction during the T1 trial. This trend is reflected in (Figure 6a,b), which show a clear relationship between inorganic carbon concentration, irradiance, pH, and seawater carbonate chemistry [49,50]. DIC increased predictably with carbon additions, with the lowest concentrations observed at 2000 µmol/kg (‘c’), intermediate levels at 4000 µmol/kg (‘b’), and highest at 8000 µmol/kg (‘a’), a pattern that remained consistent across all light treatments. Despite these differences, pH values remained relatively stable (8.89–9.21), indicating only minor fluctuations in response to carbon enrichment.
The stability of pH suggests strong natural buffering capacity of seawater and active CO2 uptake by S. horneri during photosynthesis [25,26,27,49]. As inorganic carbon availability increased, pH remained near neutral-alkaline (~8.0–9.0), consistent with efficient removal of CO2 and HCO3 from the medium during carbon fixation and associated oxygen evolution [30,51]. TA values further demonstrated that irradiance exerted only minimal influence on carbonate speciation, with bicarbonate (HCO3) remaining the dominant form of inorganic carbon available to S. horneri [28]. A similar pattern was observed in the long-term experiment (T2; Figure 7), where DIC increased with carbon additions and pH again remained stable between 8.5 and 9.0. At the highest irradiance level (200 µmol photons m−2 s−1), elevated carbon availability promoted both greater photosynthetic uptake and consistent chemical conditions, suggesting balanced carbonate dynamics. These results indicate that during photosynthesis, S. horneri actively consumes HCO3, thereby reducing its proportion in the medium and shifting the carbonate system toward increased CO32− formation [31,52]. Light intensity amplified this effect slightly, reflecting enhanced photosynthetic carbon assimilation under stronger irradiance [44,53]. Overall, the combined patterns of DIC, TA, and pH demonstrate that Sargassum horneri relies heavily on bicarbonate as a carbon substrate, efficiently regulates carbonate equilibrium during growth, and plays a functional role in seawater carbonate cycling and alkalinity maintenance—a key mechanisms supporting its potential in marine carbon capture and biogeochemical regulation [31,54].
Across all nine treatment combinations (Figure 8), bicarbonate (HCO3) constituted the dominant fraction of the dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) pool, representing approximately 65–70% of total inorganic carbon. Carbonate ions (CO32−) accounted for 25–30%, while dissolved CO2 contributed less than 10%. These proportions remained relatively stable across varying irradiance and inorganic carbon concentrations, reflecting the intrinsic carbonate equilibrium of seawater in which bicarbonate is the predominant carbon species at pH values near 8 [28]. This distribution aligns with typical marine conditions, where most of the carbon exists as HCO3 rather than free CO2 due to seawater buffering and equilibrium constraints and partitioning among CO2, HCO3, and CO32− [25,26,27].
Previous research has shown that bicarbonate acquisition varies considerably among macroalgal species and is often linked to physiological adaptation [38]. For example, in Colaconema formosanum, shifts in salinity and inorganic carbon enrichment significantly affected pigment synthesis and growth [20,22]. In the present study, total alkalinity (TA), stable pH values, and controlled temperature collectively determined the availability of DIC in the culture medium, which in turn influenced both carbon uptake and photosynthetic performance [32,55]. These outcomes suggest that, within the tested range, the relative proportions of carbon species are governed primarily by carbonate chemistry rather than irradiance levels. Although irradiance did not markedly alter the chemical speciation of DIC, it remains a key driver of macroalgal physiology [37,38,44]. Light availability directly influences growth, reproductive capacity, and metabolic performance in Sargassum horneri, consistent with findings reported for the related brown alga Hizikia fusiformis, which exhibits enhanced growth under optimal photorespiratory and photo-inhibitory conditions [33,34,48,56]. Similar studies on C. formosanum demonstrated that supplementation with inorganic carbon growth increased by approximately 18%, driven by enhanced pigment production and carbon assimilation [20,22,57].
Under controlled laboratory conditions these findings determined that S. horneri growth and photosynthetic efficiency are strongly influenced by the absolute availability of inorganic carbon but only minimally affected by irradiance-induced shifts in carbonate speciation [2,28,58]. Instead, irradiance primarily regulates metabolic activity—such as rETR, ETRmax, and biomass accumulation [37], while the chemical balance among carbon species remains governed by seawater carbonate equilibrium [25,28].
Finally, field-based validation remains necessary to confirm whether these laboratory-derived physiological responses apply to natural S. horneri populations or large-scale cultivation settings, where hydrodynamics, turbulence, diurnal cycles, and nutrient availability may further modify carbonate chemistry and carbon-use strategies [49,59].

4. Conclusions

Our experimental study revealed that Sargassum horneri is an efficient and resilient macroalgal species capable of sustaining photosynthetic efficiency, regulating carbonate use, and generating biomass across a range of light and carbon conditions with a maximum growth rate of 35–36% with the inclusion of 0.75 g/L of dissolved inorganic carbon. Light intensity paired with elevated inorganic carbon maximized growth and electron transport efficiency, while moderate conditions maintained a higher performance without signs of stress at the highest RGR of 0.012 day–1 alongside a 27.8 % increase in growth at optimum conditions. These traits of strong carbon assimilation, stable photo physiology, oxygen production, and the ability to alter the surrounding carbonate chemistry support the ecological role of S. horneri as both a fast-growing primary producer and a potential contributor to coastal carbon sequestration and bioremediation in carbon-enriched, high-light environments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.-C.L.; methodology: H.-Y.Y. and J.W.-S.; formal analysis: H.-Y.Y. and J.W.-S.; writing—original draft: J.W.-S.; writing—review and editing: H.-Y.Y. and M.-C.L.; resources: Y.-J.C. and F.-H.N.; supervision: M.-C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lee, M.-C.; Yeh, H.-Y.; Chang, C.-M.; Liou, Y.-F.; Nan, F.-H.; Wungen-Sani, J. Tracking and Utilizing Sargassum, an Abundant Resource from the Caribbean Sea. Water 2023, 15, 2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schulz, K.G.; Bach, L.T.; Dickson, A.G. Seawater carbonate chemistry considerations for ocean alkalinity enhancement research: Theory, measurements, and calculations. In Guide to Best Practices in Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement Research; Copernicus Publications: Göttingen, Germany, 2023; Volume 2-oae2023, p. 2. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yeh, H.-Y.; Libatique, M.J.; Liao, Z.-H.; Nan, F.-H.; Lee, M.-C. Environmental factors impact the early life stages of Sargassum ilicifolium in laboratory. Algal Res. 2021, 56, 102306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Komatsu, T.; Fukuda, M.; Mikami, A.; Mizuno, S.; Kantachumpoo, A.; Tanoue, H.; Kawamiya, M. Possible change in distribution of seaweed, Sargassum horneri, in northeast Asia under A2 scenario of global warming and consequent effect on some fish. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2014, 85, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Minami, K.; Kita, C.; Shirakawa, H.; Kawauchi, Y.; Shao, H.; Tomiyasu, M.; Iwahara, Y.; Takahara, H.; Kitagawa, T.; Miyashita, K. Acoustic characteristics of a potentially important macroalgae, Sargassum horneri, for coastal fisheries. Fish. Res. 2021, 240, 105955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, Z.; Jiang, X.; Li, B.; Lv, Z.; Wu, H.; Zang, S.; Yan, F.; Bao, M. Effects of UVR on Photosynthesis in Sargassum horneri (Turner) C. Agardh Adapted to Different Nitrogen Levels. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lee, P.T.; Tran, H.T.Q.; Huang, H.-T.; Nan, F.-H.; Lee, M.-C. Sargassum horneri extracts stimulate innate immunity, enhance growth performance, and upregulate immune genes in the white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 102, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. López Miranda, J.L.; Celis, L.B.; Estévez, M.; Chávez, V.; van Tussenbroek, B.I.; Uribe-Martínez, A.; Cuevas, E.; Pantoja, I.R.; Masia, L.; Cauich-Kantun, C.; et al. Commercial Potential of Pelagic Sargassum spp. in Mexico. Front. Mar. Sci. 2021, 8, 768470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Holdt, S.L.; Kraan, S. Bioactive compounds in seaweed: Functional food applications and legislation. J. Appl. Phycol. 2011, 23, 543–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, R.; Zhang, X.X.; Tang, Y.X.; Mao, J.L. Composition, isolation, purification and biological activities of Sargassum fusiforme polysaccharides: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 228, 115381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lima-Melo, Y.; Kılıç, M.; Aro, E.-M.; Gollan, P.J. Photosystem I Inhibition, Protection and Signalling: Knowns and Unknowns. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 791124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Moreira, D.; Pires, J.C.M. Atmospheric CO2 capture by algae: Negative carbon dioxide emission path. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 215, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, M.; Hu, C.; Cannizzaro, J.; English, D.; Han, X.; Naar, D.; Lapointe, B.; Brewton, R.; Hernandez, F. Remote Sensing of Sargassum Biomass, Nutrients, and Pigments. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2018, 45, 12359–12367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lewey, S.A.; Gorham, J. Pigment composition and photosynthesis in Sargassum muticum. Mar. Biol. 1984, 80, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Haehnel, W. Photosynthetic Electron Transport in Higher Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1984, 35, 659–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, S.; Zou, B.; Cao, P.; Su, X.; Xie, F.; Pan, X.; Li, M. Structural insights into photosynthetic cyclic electron transport. Mol. Plant 2023, 16, 187–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vakaloloma, U.; Ho, T.H.; Loh, J.-Y.; Chong, C.M.; Wangkahart, E.; Lee, M.-C.; Nan, F.-H.; Lai, H.-C.; Lee, P.-T. Modulation of immune genes in the mucosal-associated lymphoid tissues of cobia by Sarcodia suae extract. Vet. Res. Commun. 2023, 47, 1973–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Takahashi, S.; Milward, S.E.; Fan, D.-Y.; Chow, W.S.; Badger, M.R. How does cyclic electron flow alleviate photoinhibition in Arabidopsis? Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 1560–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Haimovich-Dayan, M.; Garfinkel, N.; Ewe, D.; Marcus, Y.; Gruber, A.; Wagner, H.; Kroth, P.G.; Kaplan, A. The role of C4 metabolism in the marine diatom Haeodactylum tricornutum. New Phytol. 2013, 197, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yeh, H.Y.; Wang, W.-L.; Lin, Y.-K.; Nan, F.-H.; Lee, M.-C. Optimizing inorganic carbon and salinity for enhanced biomass and pigment production in Colaconema formosanum: Implications for sustainable carbon sequestration and stress responses. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 388, 129720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Y.; Zhong, Z.; Qin, S.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Liu, Z. Effects of Temperature and Light on Growth Rate and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Sargassum horneri. J. Ocean. Univ. China 2021, 20, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lin, S.-M.; Huang, R.; Ogawa, H.; Liu, L.-C.; Wang, Y.-C.; Chiou, Y. Assessment of germling ability of the introduced marine brown alga, Sargassum horneri, in Northern Taiwan. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 2641–2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Maxwell, K.; Johnson, G.N. Chlorophyll fluorescence—A practical guide. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Beer, S.; Björk, M. Measuring rates of photosynthesis of two tropical seagrasses by pulse amplitude modulated (PAM) fluorometry. Aquat. Bot. 2000, 66, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chapter 1 Equilibrium. In Elsevier Oceanography Series; Zeebe, R.E., Wolf-Gladrow, D., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 1–84. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chapter 2 Kinetics. In Elsevier Oceanography Series; Zeebe, R.E., Wolf-Gladrow, D., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 85–140. [Google Scholar]
  27. Chapter 3 Stable isotope fractionation. In Elsevier Oceanography Series; Zeebe, R.E., Wolf-Gladrow, D., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 141–250. [Google Scholar]
  28. Millero, F.J. Chemical Oceanography, 2nd ed.; Taylor & Francis: Oxfordshire, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  29. Skoog, D.A.; Holler, F.J.; Crouch, S.R. Principles of Instrumental Analysis; Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  30. Brown, J.L.; Hill, D.J.; Dolan, A.M.; Carnaval, A.C.; Haywood, A.M. PaleoClim, high spatial resolution paleoclimate surfaces for global land areas. Sci. Data 2018, 5, 180254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hunt, R. Plant Growth Curves; Edward Arnold: London, UK, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lobban, C.S.; Harrison, P.J. Seaweed Ecology and Physiology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sun, X.; Wang, Q.; Luo, D.; Xu, Z.; Sun, P.; Guo, J.; Wang, H.; Liu, Z.; Yang, Y. Local effects of Sargassum beds on the seawater carbonate system and plankton community. Algal Res. 2025, 85, 103860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chung, I.K.; Beardall, J.; Mehta, S.; Sahoo, D.; Stojkovic, S. Using marine macroalgae for carbon sequestration: A critical appraisal. J. Appl. Phycol. 2010, 23, 877–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, D.; Ma, Q.; Valiela, I.; Anderson, D.M.; Keesing, J.K.; Gao, K.; Zhen, Y.; Sun, X.; Wang, Y. Role of C4 carbon fixation in Ulva prolifera, the macroalga responsible for the world’s largest green tides. Commun. Biol. 2020, 3, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, Z.; Li, L.; Jiang, H.; Yan, F.; Liu, L.; Zang, S.; Ma, Y.; Wu, H. Photosynthetic responses of a golden tide alga (Sargassum horneri) to ultraviolet radiation. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 978376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gao, K.; Beardall, J.; Häder, D.-P.; Hall-Spencer, J.M.; Gao, G.; Hutchins, D.A. Effects of Ocean Acidification on Marine Photosynthetic Organisms Under the Concurrent Influences of Warming, UV Radiation, and Deoxygenation. Front. Mar. Sci. 2019, 6, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sun, J.; Zhao, C.; Zhao, S.; Dai, W.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J.; Xu, J.; He, P. Diversity of CO2 Concentrating Mechanisms in Macroalgae Photosynthesis: A Case Study of Ulva sp. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Reinfelder, J.R.; Milligan, A.J.; Morel, F.M.M. The Role of the C4 Pathway in Carbon Accumulation and Fixation in a Marine Diatom. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 2106–2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zabaleta, E.; Martin, M.V.; Braun, H.-P. A basal carbon concentrating mechanism in plants? Plant Sci. 2012, 187, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Gordon, D.M.; Sand-Jensen, K. Effects of O2, pH and DIC on photosynthetic net-O2 evolution by marine macroalgae. Mar. Biol. 1990, 106, 445–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Holišová, P.; Zitová, M.; Klem, K.; Urban, O. Effect of elevated carbon dioxide concentration on carbon assimilation under fluctuating light. J. Environ. Qual. 2012, 41, 1931–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gao, J.; Liu, G.; Li, X.; Tang, M.; Cao, X.; Zhou, Y.; Song, C. Organic carbon quantity and composition jointly modulate the differentiation of nitrate reduction pathways in sediments of the Chinese eutrophic lake, Lake Chaohu. Water Res. 2022, 220, 118720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Falkowski, P.G.; Raven, J.A. Aquatic Photosynthesis; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  45. Raven, J.A.; Beardall, J.; Sánchez-Baracaldo, P. The possible evolution and future of CO2-concentrating mechanisms. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 3701–3716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Poorter, H.; Knopf, O.; Wright, I.J.; Temme, A.A.; Hogewoning, S.W.; Graf, A.; Cernusak, L.A.; Pons, T.L. A meta-analysis of responses of C3 plants to atmospheric CO2: Dose–response curves for 85 traits ranging from the molecular to the whole-plant level. New Phytol. 2022, 233, 1560–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Ju, W.; Chen, J.M.; Ciais, P.; Cescatti, A.; Sardans, J.; Janssens, I.A.; Wu, M.; Berry, J.A.; et al. Recent global decline of CO2 fertilization effects on vegetation photosynthesis. Science 2020, 370, 1295–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Krause-Jensen, D.; Duarte, C.M. Substantial role of macroalgae in marine carbon sequestration. Nat. Geosci. 2016, 9, 737–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hurd, C.L.; Harrison, P.J.; Bischof, K.; Lobban, C.S. Seaweed Ecology and Physiology, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  50. Wu, H.; Feng, J.; Li, X.; Zhao, C.; Liu, Y.; Yu, J.; Xu, J. Effects of increased CO2 and temperature on the physiological characteristics of the golden tide blooming macroalgae Sargassum horneri in the Yellow Sea, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 146, 639–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yan, F.; Jiang, H.; Ma, Y.; Cui, C.; Qin, H.; Liu, L.; Zang, S.; Xing, H.; Xu, Z.; Wu, H. Combined Influences of Light and Nitrogen Enrichment on the Physiological Performance of a Golden Tide Alga (Sargassum horneri). J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lee, C.-H.; Lee, K.; Kim, M.; Kim, J.; Zhang, Y.; Kang, J.W.; Choi, I.H.; Oh, J.C.; Choi, Y.; Kim, J.; et al. Alkalinity (Bicarbonate) Pumping by Coastal Macroalgal Forests. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2025, 52, e2025GL115753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Celis-Plá, P.; Martínez, B.; Korbee, N.; Hall-Spencer, J.M.; Figueroa, F.L. Photoprotective responses in a brown macroalgae Cystoseira tamariscifolia to increases in CO2 and temperature. Mar. Environ. Res. 2017, 130, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chen, B.; Yeh, H.-Y.; Huang, C.-H.; Lung, W.Q.C.; Chen, Y.-J.; Lee, P.-T.; Nan, F.-H.; Lee, M.-C. Effects of indoor culture conditions on growth and phycoerythrin content of Proteomonas sulcata (Cryptophyta) assessed by flow cytometry. J. Appl. Phycol. 2022, 34, 1201–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhai, W. Characteristics of Marine Chemical Environment and the Measurements and Analyses of Seawater Carbonate Chemistry. In Research Methods of Environmental Physiology in Aquatic Sciences; Gao, K., Hutchins, D.A., Beardall, J., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 3–16. [Google Scholar]
  56. Kokubu, S.; Nishihara, G.N.; Watanabe, Y.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Amamo, Y.; Terada, R. The effect of irradiance and temperature on the photosynthesis of a native alga Sargassum fusiforme (Fucales) from Kagoshima, Japan. Phycologia 2015, 54, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yeh, H.Y.; Wang, W.-L.; Nan, F.-H.; Lee, M.-C. Enhanced Colaconema formosanum biomass and phycoerythrin yield after manipulating inorganic carbon, irradiance, and photoperiod. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 352, 127073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ji, Y.; Gao, K. Effects of climate change factors on marine macroalgae: A review. Adv. Mar. Biol. 2021, 88, 91–136. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  59. Bach, L.T.; Tamsitt, V.; Gower, J.; Hurd, C.L.; Raven, J.A.; Boyd, P.W. Testing the climate intervention potential of ocean afforestation using the Great Atlantic Sargassum Belt. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Short-term experimental trial 12; 12 h (T1) rETR (relative rate of electron transport) vs. PAR (photosynthetically active radiation). Means + SD, n = 9 treatment levels.
Figure 1. Short-term experimental trial 12; 12 h (T1) rETR (relative rate of electron transport) vs. PAR (photosynthetically active radiation). Means + SD, n = 9 treatment levels.
Water 17 03528 g001
Figure 2. Physiological indicators of S. horneri (T1). (a) Inorganic carbon ratio and (b) dissolved O2. Means + SD, n = 9 treatment levels.
Figure 2. Physiological indicators of S. horneri (T1). (a) Inorganic carbon ratio and (b) dissolved O2. Means + SD, n = 9 treatment levels.
Water 17 03528 g002
Figure 3. The effects of light intensity (irradiance) and inorganic carbon concentration (T1); (a) the growth rate (%) and (b) the organic carbon ratio (algal weight). Superscripts indicate significant differences among treatments. N = 9.
Figure 3. The effects of light intensity (irradiance) and inorganic carbon concentration (T1); (a) the growth rate (%) and (b) the organic carbon ratio (algal weight). Superscripts indicate significant differences among treatments. N = 9.
Water 17 03528 g003
Figure 4. The measure of photosynthetic performance (a) Fv/Fm, the maximum quantum yield of Photosystem II; (b) ETRmax, measure of photosynthetic activity (μmol electrons m−2 s−1) over a 4-week trial period (T2) under 3 light intensities and 3 nutrient concentrations. N = 9.
Figure 4. The measure of photosynthetic performance (a) Fv/Fm, the maximum quantum yield of Photosystem II; (b) ETRmax, measure of photosynthetic activity (μmol electrons m−2 s−1) over a 4-week trial period (T2) under 3 light intensities and 3 nutrient concentrations. N = 9.
Water 17 03528 g004
Figure 5. The effects of light intensity (irradiance) and inorganic carbon concentration on the photosynthetic performance of S. horneri; (a) Fv/Fm, photosynthetic efficiency; (b) ETRmax, maximum electron transport rate). Superscripts indicate significant differences among treatments. N = 9.
Figure 5. The effects of light intensity (irradiance) and inorganic carbon concentration on the photosynthetic performance of S. horneri; (a) Fv/Fm, photosynthetic efficiency; (b) ETRmax, maximum electron transport rate). Superscripts indicate significant differences among treatments. N = 9.
Water 17 03528 g005
Figure 6. T1 seawater inorganic carbon and pH levels in S. horneri culture medium coupled with a relationship between light intensity (irradiance) and inorganic carbon concentration (DIC in seawater (bars) and pH (orange line). (a) Dissolved inorganic carbon. (b) Total alkalinity. Superscripts indicate significant differences among treatments. N = 9.
Figure 6. T1 seawater inorganic carbon and pH levels in S. horneri culture medium coupled with a relationship between light intensity (irradiance) and inorganic carbon concentration (DIC in seawater (bars) and pH (orange line). (a) Dissolved inorganic carbon. (b) Total alkalinity. Superscripts indicate significant differences among treatments. N = 9.
Water 17 03528 g006
Figure 7. T2 seawater inorganic carbon and pH levels in S. horneri culture medium coupled with a relationship between light intensity (irradiance) and inorganic carbon concentration (DIC in seawater (bars) and pH (orange line)). (a) Dissolved inorganic carbon. (b) Total alkalinity. Superscripts indicate significant differences among treatments. N = 9.
Figure 7. T2 seawater inorganic carbon and pH levels in S. horneri culture medium coupled with a relationship between light intensity (irradiance) and inorganic carbon concentration (DIC in seawater (bars) and pH (orange line)). (a) Dissolved inorganic carbon. (b) Total alkalinity. Superscripts indicate significant differences among treatments. N = 9.
Water 17 03528 g007
Figure 8. (a) T1 and (b) T2: Carbon speciation of CO2, HCO3 (bicarbonate), and CO32− (carbonate) distribution in S. horneri culture medium under 3 light intensities (irradiance) and 3 inorganic carbon concentrations. N = 9.
Figure 8. (a) T1 and (b) T2: Carbon speciation of CO2, HCO3 (bicarbonate), and CO32− (carbonate) distribution in S. horneri culture medium under 3 light intensities (irradiance) and 3 inorganic carbon concentrations. N = 9.
Water 17 03528 g008
Table 1. A one-way analysis of variance, ANOVA, of the factors influencing growth over a long-term period (T2) with the interactions of light (irradiance) and inorganic carbon.
Table 1. A one-way analysis of variance, ANOVA, of the factors influencing growth over a long-term period (T2) with the interactions of light (irradiance) and inorganic carbon.
TreatmentsTotal Organic CarbonpHO2
(mg L−1)
SalinityWeight
(g)
ETRm
(μmol photons m−2 s−1)
L1_C10.618 ± 0.004 c9.12 ± 0.14 b7.17 ± 3.12 a3.10 ± 0.17 ab4.63 ± 0.35 abc19.5 ± 0.46 b
L1_C20.374 ± 0.006 b9.18 ± 0.03 b7.13 ± 1.33 a3.03 ± 0.15 ab4.46 ± 0.06 ab12.9 ± 1.69 b
L1_C30.371 ± 0.002 ab8.95 ± 0.05 a8.07 ± 0.86 a3.30 ± 0.17 abc4.49 ± 0.06 ab19.0 ± 5.21 a
L2_C10.370 ± 0.005 ab9.14 ± 0.12 b7.20 ± 0.26 a3.00 ± 0.00 a4.88 ± 0.47 abc17.5 ± 2.21 b
L2_C20.368 ± 0.002 ab9.21 ± 0.04 b7.83 ± 0.21 a3.07 ± 0.12 ab4.60 ± 0.25 bc15.7 ± 0.43 b
L2_C30.401 ± 0.006 b8.89 ± 0.09 a8.87 ± 1.16 a3.27 ± 0.15 abc5.14 ± 0.09 c20.1 ± 1.92 a
L3_C10.378 ± 0.030 ab9.19 ± 0.02 b6.93 ± 0.51 a3.13 ± 0.15 ab4.71 ± 0.49 abc18.3 ± 1.67 b
L3_C20.394 ± 0.003 b9.20 ± 0.08 b7.77 ± 0.67 a3.47 ± 0.06 c4.24 ± 0.37 c14.2 ± 5.98 b
L3_C30.343 ± 0.065 a8.93 ± 0.06 a9.43 ± 4.30 a3.17 ± 0.08 ab5.16 ± 0.05 c18.6 ± 4.44 a
Notes: L1, L2, L3: Light intensity levels (100, 150, and 200 μmol photons m−2 s−1). C1, C2, C3: Inorganic carbon concentrations (2000, 4000, and 8000 μmol/kg) ± mean ± standard deviation, SD (variation among replicates). Superscript letters (a, b, c) indicate significant difference.
Table 2. Relative growth rate (RGR), percentage growth, and organic carbon ratio across light × carbon treatments in Sargassum horneri over a long-term period (T2) with interactions of light (irradiance) and inorganic carbon.
Table 2. Relative growth rate (RGR), percentage growth, and organic carbon ratio across light × carbon treatments in Sargassum horneri over a long-term period (T2) with interactions of light (irradiance) and inorganic carbon.
TreatmentRGR (day−1)Growth (%)Organic Carbon Ratio (Algal Wt.)
L1_C10.00422.300.62
L1_C20.00422.260.37
L1_C30.00522.800.37
L2_C10.00925.470.37
L2_C20.00623.590.37
L2_C30.00623.830.40
L3_C10.00925.470.38
L3_C20.01227.780.39
L3_C30.00925.830.34
Notes: L1, L2, L3: Light intensity levels (100, 150, and 200 μmol photons m−2 s−1). C1, C2, C3: Inorganic carbon concentrations (2000, 4000, and 8000 μM).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wungen-Sani, J.; Yeh, H.-Y.; Chen, Y.-J.; Nan, F.-H.; Lee, M.-C. The Effects of Inorganic Carbon and Irradiance on the Photosynthetic Performance and Growth of the Macroalga Sargassum horneri. Water 2025, 17, 3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17243528

AMA Style

Wungen-Sani J, Yeh H-Y, Chen Y-J, Nan F-H, Lee M-C. The Effects of Inorganic Carbon and Irradiance on the Photosynthetic Performance and Growth of the Macroalga Sargassum horneri. Water. 2025; 17(24):3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17243528

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wungen-Sani, Jane, Han-Yang Yeh, Yi-Jung Chen, Fan-Hua Nan, and Meng-Chou Lee. 2025. "The Effects of Inorganic Carbon and Irradiance on the Photosynthetic Performance and Growth of the Macroalga Sargassum horneri" Water 17, no. 24: 3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17243528

APA Style

Wungen-Sani, J., Yeh, H.-Y., Chen, Y.-J., Nan, F.-H., & Lee, M.-C. (2025). The Effects of Inorganic Carbon and Irradiance on the Photosynthetic Performance and Growth of the Macroalga Sargassum horneri. Water, 17(24), 3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17243528

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop