Next Article in Journal
Migration and Heating Mechanisms of Deep-Cyclogenic Thermal Water in Geothermal-Anomaly Mines
Previous Article in Journal
AI-Based Time-Series Ensemble Approach Coupled with a Hydrological Model for Reservoir Storage Prediction in Korea
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Towards Sustainable Proton Exchange Membranes: Materials and Challenges for Water Electrolysis

by
Filip Komers
1,2,
Daniela Plachá
3,*,
Bart Van der Bruggen
1,4 and
Svetlozar Velizarov
5,*
1
Laboratory of Advanced Nanomaterials, Nanotechnology Centre, CEET, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
2
Faculty of Materials Science and Technology, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
3
Energy Research Centre, CEET, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
4
Department of Chemical Engineering, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
5
LAQV/REQUIMTE, Department of Chemistry, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA FCT, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2025, 17(22), 3297; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17223297
Submission received: 30 September 2025 / Revised: 2 November 2025 / Accepted: 14 November 2025 / Published: 18 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Water-Energy Nexus)

Abstract

This article provides a comparative analysis of sustainable polymer membranes based on biopolymers and Nafion in the context of proton exchange membrane (PEM) for water electrolyzers. Nafion, a perfluorinated polymer, has been a standard choice for PEM applications due to its excellent proton conductivity and chemical stability. However, the sustainability challenges associated with its production, lifecycle and cost necessitate the exploration of alternative materials that may offer comparable performance while being environmentally friendly. The most promising alternative polymer for PEM electrolyzers appears to be cellulose with good thermal stability at 200 °C and a water absorption of 35%, which is slightly higher compared to Nafion membranes with a water absorption value of around 30%. Sustainable PEMs also have much lower hydrogen permeability, e.g., chitosan has been determined to have a permeability of 7 barrers, while Nafion is characterized by a value of more than 100 barrers. The biggest drawbacks of sustainable membranes are proton conductivity and durability, where Nafion membranes are still superior. This review also focuses on mechanical properties, chemical resistance, preparation methods and cost-effectiveness. Sustainable polymers show promising properties for supporting efficient hydrogen production, especially in dynamic operating environments facilitated by renewable energy sources.
Keywords: proton exchange membrane; water electrolysis; sustainable materials; green hydrogen proton exchange membrane; water electrolysis; sustainable materials; green hydrogen

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Komers, F.; Plachá, D.; Van der Bruggen, B.; Velizarov, S. Towards Sustainable Proton Exchange Membranes: Materials and Challenges for Water Electrolysis. Water 2025, 17, 3297. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17223297

AMA Style

Komers F, Plachá D, Van der Bruggen B, Velizarov S. Towards Sustainable Proton Exchange Membranes: Materials and Challenges for Water Electrolysis. Water. 2025; 17(22):3297. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17223297

Chicago/Turabian Style

Komers, Filip, Daniela Plachá, Bart Van der Bruggen, and Svetlozar Velizarov. 2025. "Towards Sustainable Proton Exchange Membranes: Materials and Challenges for Water Electrolysis" Water 17, no. 22: 3297. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17223297

APA Style

Komers, F., Plachá, D., Van der Bruggen, B., & Velizarov, S. (2025). Towards Sustainable Proton Exchange Membranes: Materials and Challenges for Water Electrolysis. Water, 17(22), 3297. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17223297

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop