Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Climate Change on Water Quality: A Critical Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Runoff Estimation in the Upper Yangtze River Basin Based on CMIP6 and WRF-Hydro Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Untangling the Characteristics and Ecological Processes of Microbial Community Assembly in the Source Area of the East Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project in China Under Different Water Periods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Freshwater Ecosystems—Biodiversity and Protection

1
National Water Reference Laboratory of Slovakia, Department of Assessment and Aquatic Ecosystems Research, Water Research Institute, 81249 Bratislava, Slovakia
2
Department of Hydroecology and Water Protection, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”—National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
3
Department of Biology, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
4
Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Višegradska 33, 18000 Niš, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2025, 17(21), 3109; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17213109
Submission received: 24 October 2025 / Accepted: 27 October 2025 / Published: 30 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Freshwater Ecosystems—Biodiversity and Protection)

1. Introduction to the Special Issue

In recent times, there have been growing concerns about biodiversity and habitat protection in all ecosystems, especially freshwater ecosystems, since some of the strongest negative anthropogenic influences are evident in lakes, rivers, ponds, and floodplains [1,2,3]. Globally, efforts are being made to protect biodiversity, reduce habitat destruction, and ensure vital ecological services through the assessment and monitoring of aquatic habitats and communities, as well as the development of protection, revitalization, and restoration plans for natural freshwater ecosystems [2,3,4]. To achieve these goals, it is essential to understand how ecosystems function, the status of present communities, and the main environmental factors influencing them [5,6]. Furthermore, biotic elements or multi-indicator approaches can be instrumental in the protection and management of freshwater systems [5,6,7].
It is vital to approach these issues from different angles and disciplines because freshwater bioassessment is complex process. Certain taxonomic groups, such as Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera (EPT), oligochaetes, and chironomids, are particularly important as indicators of water quality, reflecting both good and degraded status [5,6,7]. With increasing anthropogenic pressures and climate change, there is a pressing need for regular monitoring of aquatic ecosystems and for updating and improving applied bioassessment methods. Large-scale international initiatives, such as the Joint Danube Survey, play a critical role in comprehensive data collection and analysis regarding aquatic biodiversity, biotic community structure, chemical status, pollution, microplastics, hydromorphological alterations, and other ecosystem parameters [8,9].
Microplastic pollution has emerged as a major concern in recent years, affecting organisms across trophic levels and potentially impacting human health [8]. Molecular approaches such as eDNA metabarcoding have advanced our ability to accurately assess biodiversity. For instance, Pleše and Buj assessed endangered lamprey species in Croatia, providing insights into their phylogeny, ecology, and conservation needs. Similarly, Šimunović et al. studied the phytoplankton community in a karstic lake, using both morphological and molecular methods to evaluate the applicability of eDNA metabarcoding as a biomonitoring tool.
The aim of this Special Issue is to highlight contemporary challenges in freshwater ecology, including biodiversity loss, environmental stressors—both natural and anthropogenic—biotic community structure and functional complexity, and the application of molecular analyses in hydrobiological research and bioassessment. The contributions gathered here provide valuable insights from diverse studies and demonstrate the importance of integrating classical ecological approaches with modern molecular, chemical, and biotic assessment tools [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12].

2. A Summary of the Special Issue

This Special Issue presents 11 research articles focused on the ecology, biodiversity, and monitoring of freshwater ecosystems under increasing anthropogenic pressures. The studies cover a wide range of topics, including phytoplankton assessment using morphological and molecular approaches, ecological differentiation of oligochaete communities, and conservation of Unio crassus. Other contributions explore the application of the EPT index for water quality assessment, microplastic pollution in benthic organisms, and the genetic diversity and conservation requirements of lampreys in Croatia. Research on meiofaunal assemblages in Baiyangdian Lake (China) further advances understanding of ecosystem health and restoration priorities. Together, these studies provide valuable insights into freshwater biodiversity and highlight the importance of integrating classical and modern approaches for effective ecological assessment and management.
Šimunović et al. presented a study characterizing the phytoplankton community of a natural karstic lake by combining and comparing morphological and molecular approaches to check the applicability of eDNA metabarcoding as a biomonitoring tool. A total of 51 phytoplankton taxa were found using the morphological approach, whilst the molecular approach discovered 97 ASVs that corresponded to the algal community. The comparability of both approaches in describing phytoplankton communities is evident in the designation of centric diatoms, dinoflagellates and cryptophytes as descriptive taxa. The authors also showed that both approaches proved reliable in detecting functional groups (Lo, C, X2, X3) with similar ecological demands. It was confirmed that eDNA metabarcoding is an applicable tool for biodiversity monitoring of a natural karst lake and should be used as a feasible supplement to traditional microscopy in phytoplankton community assessments.
Atanacković et al. examined the distribution of oligochaete species and their ecological differentiation with respect to environmental factors: altitude, temperature, oxygen concentration, conductivity, total organic carbon, and waterbody type. Although they are widespread, differentiation of oligochaete communities in four waterbody types and altitudinal groups was observed through alpha and beta diversity. The study showed that the total beta diversity decreased with a decrease in waterbody size and with an increase in the size of substrate particles, river flow velocity, and altitude. Communities from small mountain rivers and streams and large and medium rivers with coarser substrates differed from other oligochaete communities. The described research represents an important step for using oligochaetes more reliably and effectively, as they are a necessary BQE (biological quality element) in the biological validation of waterbody typology in routine monitoring practice.
Tomović et al. contributed to the knowledge on Unio crassus Philipson, 1788, a species with high priority for conservation. The research covered a variety of waterbody types throughout Serbia, and distribution data were considered over three time periods from 1953 to 2019. The paper summarizes all the available literature data, field research and information obtained during the review of the malacological material collection of the Natural History Museum in Belgrade. The results show a positive population trend, which is reflected in an extension of the distribution area and an increase in population density. The study also revealed better insights into the habitat requirements and limiting factors of the species (e.g., substrate characteristics, waterbody types, altitude, and some nutrients seem to be of great importance for the occurrence of the species).
Tubić et al. evaluated the significance of the EPT index in the water quality assessment of three types of waterbodies in hilly and mountainous regions of Serbia. The authors compared the obtained values of biological indices used for the water quality assessment according to the national legislation with the overall status assessment represented by the ecological quality classes (EQC). The results indicate that the EPT index is an excellent indicator of changes in water quality and an important tool for the ecological categorization of waterbodies in mountainous regions.
Stanković et al. studied microplastics in chosen benthic organisms (Corbicula spp., Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri (Claparede, 1862), and Polypedilum nubeculosum (Meigen, 1804)), obtained during the Joint Danube Survey 4 (JDS4) expedition. Alkaline and enzymatic protocols were performed for tissue degradation, followed by filtering through glass microfiber filters (mesh size 0.5 µm), and MP particles were photographed, measured, and counted. After µ-ATR-FTIR spectroscopy analysis, the particles were characterized as polycarbonate (PC), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene–polyethylene copolymer (PP-PE), nylon (polyamide-PA) and cellophane, with PET being dominant. New knowledge on microplastics in aquatic environments and organisms is crucial for the protection of nature.
Pleše and Buj addressed the pressing issue of protecting endangered lamprey species in Croatia, a crucial element in preserving biodiversity, particularly in the face of increasing human-induced impacts on natural ecosystems due to global warming. The study aimed to bridge the knowledge gap by assessing the genetic diversity and structure of identified lamprey species and lineages in Croatia using the gene for cytochrome b. The research revealed four distinct lineages within the species Eudontomyzon vladykovi Oliva and Zanandrea, 1959, confirmed the presence of the species Eudontomyzon danfordi Regan, 1911, in Croatia, and provided important insights into the intricate relationships and conservation needs of lampreys, providing a basis for future discussions involving additional genetic markers. By gaining a comprehensive understanding of the taxonomy, ecology, and genetic diversity of lampreys, we can ensure their conservation and that of associated ecosystems.
Cao et al. conducted their research on the Baiyangdian Lake, North China Plain, which plays a pivotal role in maintaining the regional ecological balance and biodiversity. The aim was to evaluate the density, spatiotemporal patterns, and habitat response dynamics of meiofauna, primarily comprising freshwater nematodes (91.78%), ostracods, and copepods. The study indicated that the distribution and abundance of meiofauna were significantly affected by environmental factors, with water depth and ammonia nitrogen levels being potential key determinants. The authors evaluated the “health status” of the Baiyangdian ecosystem, which can later aid the protection of biodiversity of this area, and can also provide scientific support for its ecological restoration and governance as well as the assessment of ecological service functions.
Together, these studies demonstrate the value of integrating traditional ecological approaches with molecular, chemical, and biotic assessment tools. They contribute to a better understanding of ecosystem responses and inform effective conservation and management strategies, advancing global efforts to preserve freshwater biodiversity and maintain sustainable aquatic environments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: D.Č., M.R., F.S. and D.M.; writing—original draft preparation: D.Č. and M.R.; writing—review and editing: D.Č., M.R., F.S. and D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The Guest Editors thank all authors for their contributions and the reviewers for their constructive comments. Special thanks are also extended to the editorial team of Water for their professional assistance and support.

Conflicts of Interest

The Guest Editors served as editors for this Special Issue but had no role in the peer-review or decision-making processes for papers in which they were authors. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Šimunović, M.; Kulaš, A.; Žutinić, P.; Gligora Udovič, M. Phytoplankton Diversity of a Natural Karst Lake Combining Morphological and Molecular Approaches. Water 2023, 15, 1379. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15071379.
  • Atanacković, A.; Popović, N.; Marinković, N.; Tomović, J.; Đuknić, J.; Stanković, J.; Paunović, M. Effects of Environmental Factors on the Distribution and Diversity of Aquatic Oligochaetes. Water 2023, 15, 3873. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15223873.
  • Tomović, J.; Simić, V.; Petrović, A.; Atanacković, A.; Zorić, K.; Paunović, M.; Raković, M. Distribution Range of the Endangered Species Unio crassus Philipsson, 1788 in Serbia (Western Balkans Region), Historical and Recent Data. Water 2023, 15, 4248. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15244248.
  • Tubić, B.; Andjus, S.; Zorić, K.; Vasiljević, B.; Jovičić, K.; Čanak Atlagić, J.; Paunović, M. Aquatic Insects (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera) Metric as an Important Tool in Water Quality Assessment in Hilly and Mountain Streams. Water 2024, 16, 849. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16060849.
  • Stanković, J.; Milošević, D.; Paunović, M.; Jovanović, B.; Popović, N.; Tomović, J.; Atanacković, A.; Radulović, K.; Lončarević, D.; Raković, M. Microplastics in the Danube River and Its Main Tributaries—Ingestion by Freshwater Macroinvertebrates. Water 2024, 16, 962. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16070962.
  • Pleše, S.; Buj, I. Tackling the Phylogeny of Lampreys—Insight from the Croatia’s Danube Basin. Water 2024, 16, 1153. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16081153.
  • Cao, Y.; Mu, J.; Pan, Z.; Ma, F.; Liu, J.; Dong, H.; Zhang, W.; Wang, L. Study on the Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics of Meiofauna in Baiyangdian Lake and Its Influencing Factors. Water 2024, 16, 1959. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16141959.
  • Sotomayor, G.; Alvarado, A.; Romero, J.; López, C.; Aguilar, M.; Forio, M.; Goethals, P. Limnological Characteristics and Relationships with Primary Productivity in Two High Andean Hydroelectric Reservoirs in Ecuador. Water 2024, 16, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16142012.
  • Zhang, Y.; He, W.; Wang, L.; Ou, D.; Qiu, J.; Li, W.; Huang, H. Environmental DNA Metabarcoding as a Promising Conservation Tool for Monitoring Fish Diversity in Dongshan Bay, China. Water 2025, 17, 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17030452.
  • Liu, X.; Ho, L.; De Cock, A.; De Saeyer, N.; Pham, K.; Panique-Casso, D.; Forio, M.; Goethals, P. Water Quality and Its Influence on Waterbird Habitat Distribution: A Study Along the Lieve River, Belgium. Water 2025, 17, 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17040595.
  • Cai, W.; Wen, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, X.; Zheng, H.; Chen, J.; Hu, Z.; Zhong, Q.; Wu, J. Untangling the Characteristics and Ecological Processes of Microbial Community Assembly in the Source Area of the East Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project in China Under Different Water Periods. Water 2025, 17, 649. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17050649.

References

  1. Dudgeon, D.; Arthington, A.H.; Gessner, M.O.; Kawabata, Z.I.; Knowler, D.J.; Lévêque, C.; Naiman, R.J.; Prieur-Richard, A.H.; Soto, D.; Stiassny, M.L.J.; et al. Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol. Rev. 2006, 81, 163–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Vörösmarty, C.J.; McIntyre, P.B.; Gessner, M.O.; Dudgeon, D.; Prusevich, A.; Green, P.; Glidden, S.; Bunn, S.E.; Sullivan, C.A.; Liermann, C.R.; et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 2010, 467, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Allan, J.D.; Castillo, M.M. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters, 2nd ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  4. Poff, N.L.; Allan, J.D.; Bain, M.B.; Karr, J.R.; Prestegaard, K.L.; Richter, B.D.; Sparks, R.E.; Stromberg, J.C. The natural flow regime: A paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 1997, 47, 769–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bonada, N.; Prat, N.; Resh, V.H.; Statzner, B. Developments in aquatic insect biomonitoring: A comparative analysis of recent approaches. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2006, 51, 495–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Heino, J.; Mykrä, H.; Kotanen, J. Environmental and spatial controls of freshwater invertebrate assemblages across Europe. Freshw. Biol. 2008, 53, 796–813. [Google Scholar]
  7. Roussel, J.M.; Paillisson, J.M.; Tréguier, A.; Petit, E. The downside of eDNA as a biomonitoring tool: Lessons from the literature. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 344–352. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wagner, M.; Lambert, S. Freshwater microplastics: Emerging ecological threats and methods for detection. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 234, 331–341. [Google Scholar]
  9. Woodward, G.; Perkins, D.M.; Brown, L.E. Climate change and freshwater ecosystems: Impacts across multiple levels of organization. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2010, 365, 2093–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Deiner, K.; Bik, H.M.; Mächler, E.; Seymour, M.; Lacoursière-Roussel, A.; Altermatt, F.; Creer, S.; Bista, I.; Lodge, D.M.; de Vere, N.; et al. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities. Mol. Ecol. 2017, 26, 5872–5895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Maitland, P.S.; Renaud, C.B. Lampreys: Conservation and Status of 2nd Order Freshwater Vertebrates. Fish Fish. 2011, 12, 89–116. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bista, I.; Carvalho, G.R.; Walsh, K.; Seymour, M.; Hajibabaei, M.; Lallias, D.; Creer, S. Annual monitoring of freshwater biodiversity using eDNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. 2017, 26, 5432–5447. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Čerba, D.; Raković, M.; Stević, F.; Milošević, D. Freshwater Ecosystems—Biodiversity and Protection. Water 2025, 17, 3109. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17213109

AMA Style

Čerba D, Raković M, Stević F, Milošević D. Freshwater Ecosystems—Biodiversity and Protection. Water. 2025; 17(21):3109. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17213109

Chicago/Turabian Style

Čerba, Dubravka, Maja Raković, Filip Stević, and Djuradj Milošević. 2025. "Freshwater Ecosystems—Biodiversity and Protection" Water 17, no. 21: 3109. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17213109

APA Style

Čerba, D., Raković, M., Stević, F., & Milošević, D. (2025). Freshwater Ecosystems—Biodiversity and Protection. Water, 17(21), 3109. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17213109

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop