Next Article in Journal
Hybrid Decomposition Strategies and Model Combinatorial Optimization for Runoff Prediction
Previous Article in Journal
A Study on the Coordinated Operation of Reservoirs with Low Watershed Magnification Ratios Using Surplus Storage Capacity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Review of Sub-Models in Groundwater System Dynamics Models to Facilitate “Lego-Like” Modeling

by
Mehdi Moghadam Manesh
* and
Allyson Beall King
The School of the Environment, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2025, 17(17), 2559; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17172559
Submission received: 9 July 2025 / Revised: 19 August 2025 / Accepted: 26 August 2025 / Published: 29 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Hydraulics and Hydrodynamics)

Abstract

Groundwater resource management involves complex socio-hydrological systems characterized by dynamic feedback, uncertainty, and common misconceptions among decision-makers. While deterministic models like MODFLOW simulate physical hydrology effectively, they fall short in capturing the social, legal, and behavioral dynamics shaping groundwater use. System dynamics (SD) modeling offers a robust alternative by incorporating feedback loops, delays, and nonlinearities. Yet, model conceptualization remains one of the most challenging steps in SD practice. Experienced modelers often apply a “Lego-like” approach—assembling new models from pre-validated sub-models. However, this strategy depends on access to well-documented sub-model libraries, which are typically unavailable to newcomers. To address this barrier, we systematically review and classify socio-economic sub-models from existing groundwater SD literature, organizing them by system archetypes and generic structures. The resulting modular library offers a practical resource that supports newcomers in building structured, scalable models. This approach improves conceptual clarity, enhances model reusability, and facilitates faster development of SD models tailored to groundwater systems. The study concludes by identifying directions for future research, including expanding the sub-model library, clarifying criteria for base-model selection, improving integration methods, and applying these approaches through diverse case studies to further strengthen the robustness and utility of groundwater SD modeling.
Keywords: system dynamics (SD); model conceptualization; Lego-like modeling; modular modeling; groundwater; sub-models; archetypes; generic structures system dynamics (SD); model conceptualization; Lego-like modeling; modular modeling; groundwater; sub-models; archetypes; generic structures

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moghadam Manesh, M.; Beall King, A. Review of Sub-Models in Groundwater System Dynamics Models to Facilitate “Lego-Like” Modeling. Water 2025, 17, 2559. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17172559

AMA Style

Moghadam Manesh M, Beall King A. Review of Sub-Models in Groundwater System Dynamics Models to Facilitate “Lego-Like” Modeling. Water. 2025; 17(17):2559. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17172559

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moghadam Manesh, Mehdi, and Allyson Beall King. 2025. "Review of Sub-Models in Groundwater System Dynamics Models to Facilitate “Lego-Like” Modeling" Water 17, no. 17: 2559. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17172559

APA Style

Moghadam Manesh, M., & Beall King, A. (2025). Review of Sub-Models in Groundwater System Dynamics Models to Facilitate “Lego-Like” Modeling. Water, 17(17), 2559. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17172559

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop