Next Article in Journal
Comparative Assessment Using Different Topographic Change Detection Algorithms for Gravity Erosion Quantification Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical and Isotopic Investigation of Abiotic Oxidation of Lactate Substrate in the Presence of Varied Electron Acceptors and Under Circumneutral Anaerobic Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Changes of Ecosystem Service Value in the Water Source Area of the West Route of the South–North Water Diversion Project

1
College of Environmental Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
3
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Environment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2025, 17(15), 2305; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17152305 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 26 May 2025 / Revised: 17 July 2025 / Accepted: 22 July 2025 / Published: 3 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Watershed Ecohydrology and Water Quality Modeling)

Abstract

To ensure water source security and sustainability of the national major strategic project “South-to-North Water Diversion”, this study aims to evaluate the spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of the ecosystem service value (ESV) in its water source area from 2002 to 2022. This study reveals its changing trends and main influencing factors, and thereby provides scientific support for the ecological protection and management of the water source area. Quantitative assessment of the ESV of the region was carried out using the Equivalence Factor Method (EFM), aiming to provide scientific support for ecological protection and resource management decision-making. In the past 20 years, the ESV has shown an upward trend year by year, increasing by 96%. The regions with the highest ESV were Garzê Prefecture and Aba Prefecture, which increased by 130.3% and 60.6%, respectively. The ESV of Xinlong county, Danba county, Rangtang county, and Daofu county increased 4.8 times, 1.5 times, 12.5 times, and 8.9 times, respectively. In the last two decades, arable land has decreased by 91%, while the proportions of bare land and water have decreased by 84% and 91%, respectively. Grassland had the largest proportion. Forests and grasslands, vital for climate regulation, water cycle management, and biodiversity conservation, have expanded by 74% and 43%, respectively. It can be seen from Moran’s I index values that the dataset as a whole showed a slight positive spatial autocorrelation, which increased from −0.041396 to 0.046377. This study reveals the changing trends in ESV and the main influencing factors, and thereby provides scientific support for the ecological protection and management of the water source area.

1. Introduction

China’s South–North Water Diversion Project, a critical hydraulic infrastructure initiative, mitigates regional water disparities and promotes equitable economic development across regions. The unimplemented Western Route aims to resolve western water shortages through inter-basin transfer from the Yangtze to the Yellow River. The ecosystem service value (ESV) can measure regional ecological quality, which is the foundation of ecological protection and an important basis for ecological engineering decision-making [1]. Accurately calculating ESV is crucial for scientifically managing ecosystems [2]. This study focuses on the water source area and explores the impact of water diversion on the ESV of the water source area, providing a research basis for ecological compensation after the implementation of the project.
Ecosystem services are the various goods and services that natural systems provide, directly or indirectly, to human societies through their processes and structures [3]. Spearheaded by the United Nations, the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) constituted the inaugural global effort to systematically appraise ecosystem services’ conditions and trajectories. It laid a conceptual foundation for ecosystem service science and significantly advanced the development of valuation methodologies worldwide. Among these, monetary valuation methods have gained prominence for translating ecosystem functions into quantifiable economic indicators, thus offering valuable support for policy-making, natural resource management, and the design of ecological compensation mechanisms. Such monetary assessments not only help reveal the hidden economic contributions of ecosystems to regional development, but also serve as key metrics for evaluating ecological civilization progress and sustainability performance at the regional level [4].
The quantitative assessment of ESV primarily relies on two methods: the functional value method and the equivalent factor method [5]. While the functional method offers greater theoretical accuracy, it requires extensive ecological and socioeconomic data, making it less practical for large-scale or data-scarce areas [6]. Owing to its straightforward methodology and extensive relevance, the equivalent factor approach has seen predominant adoption. Costanza’s study pioneered ESV estimation using unit-area values of land use categories. However, the global averages used limit its direct applicability in ecologically diverse regions such as China [7,8]. To address this, Xie Gaodi et al. [9] developed a localized equivalent factor system tailored to China’s ecological conditions. This approach is now extensively applied across various spatial scales in China, including watersheds [10], provinces [11,12], and cities [13], supporting ecological compensation, land use planning, and sustainability efforts.
ESV encompasses four key categories: cultural, regulating, provisioning, and supporting services [14]. The majority of ESV [15] focuses on agricultural lands, forests, wetlands, and so on. Grassland and forest degradation and biodiversity loss threaten the stability of the regional ecological environment [16,17]. This assessment method can effectively guide the restoration of ecosystems, maintain ecological security, and inform land use planning [18]. The ecological environment in the western region of China is fragile. Frequent alterations to land use patterns have undermined the inherent configuration and equilibrium of regional ecosystems, leading to a degradation of ecosystem service capacity, amplifying ecological vulnerabilities, and ultimately jeopardizing the prospects for sustainable development [19,20]. The change in land use involved multiple factors, which was a complex process [21]. The water source area is sensitive to both climate change and human activities [22]. As critical safeguards for preserving ecosystem integrity, water retention capacity, and environmental sustainability, quantifying the ESV of key eco-functional areas helps in the rational planning of land use and implementation of good environmental protection measures, ultimately achieving the goal of ecological economic coordination, stability, and sustainable development.
With this background, the present study was conducted with three objectives: (i) to develop an ESV assessment model suitable for the Western Route region; (ii) to analyze the spatiotemporal patterns and evolution of ESV from 2002 to 2022 using Moran’s I index; and (iii) to explore the spatial response mechanisms of ESV under land use change.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Area and Region Division

For this study, three provincial-level administrative regions—Sichuan, Yunnan, and Qinghai provinces—were selected, covering 9 prefecture-level administrative divisions and 47 county-level administrative units (Figure 1). The study area is primarily located in the northwestern plateau region of Sichuan Province, characterized by its remote geographical location, underdeveloped economy, and fragile ecological environment.
Three typical years of 2002 (Figure 2a), 2012(Figure 2b), and 2022 (Figure 2c) of land use status data were selected, classifying land use types into six categories based on regional characteristics: cropland, forest, grassland, wetland, bare land, and water bodies. This study merged similar land use types to obtain six types of land. The farmland ecosystem in the research area includes dry land and paddy fields, collectively referred to as farmland; woodland, shrubland, sparse woodland, and other forest types, etc., are integrated into a forest ecosystem; high, medium, and low coverage grasslands, etc., are merged into grassland ecosystems; lakes, rivers, reservoirs, etc., are merged into aquatic ecosystems; bare land and unused land form two additional separate ecosystems. This article focused on the study of natural ecosystems and therefore did not consider construction land, such as urban land, rural residential areas, and tourist attractions. The spatial raster data resolution was 30 m, using the CGCS1984 coordinate system.

2.2. Ecosystem Service Value Assessment

This study quantifies the ESV of the research area by adapting Xie Gaodi’s “equivalent value per unit area” table, which is integrated with the ecological characteristics of regions such as Garzê and Aba in the Western Route Project area. Data sources included land use planning documents, statistical yearbooks, and peer-reviewed literature. In these regions, ecosystems such as farmland, grasslands, and forests have significant contributions to the local social, economic, and ecological environment services; therefore, accurately assessing their ESV has high practical value.
The equivalent factor method quantifies ESV by establishing a benchmark unit’s ESV equivalent factor. This standard serves to gauge relative contributions across ecosystems [9]. The standard equivalent of this study is defined as the economic value of the annual natural grain output of farmland with a national average yield of 1 hectare, and all subsequent studies are based on this parameter; for example, according to the research method of Xie [9], the net profit of food production in agricultural ecosystems is used as a standard equivalent factor for the value of ecosystem services. The calculation formula is as follows:
E a = 1 7 e = 1 h m e p e q e M
m e = 1 h i = 1 h m i
p e = 1 h i = 1 h p i
q e = 1 h i = 1 h q i
M = 1 h i = 1 h M i
where Ea is the unit equivalent factor economic value, CNY/ha; pe is the average price of grain, CNY/kg; qe is the yield per unit area of grain planted, kg/ha; me is the area for planting crops, ha; M is the total planting area of major crops, ha. m i , p i , q i , and M i are the area planted with e crop in year i (hm2), the national average price (CNY/t), the production per unit area (t/hm2), and the area planted with all crops in year i (hm2), respectively.
E S V = n = 1 i A i S i E a
where Ai refers to the coefficient for land type; Si represents the land area; and ESV represents the ecosystem services value.

2.3. Data Sources

The statistical data for 2002, 2012, and 2022 (Table 1) were sourced from the national compilation of agricultural product cost–benefit data and China statistical yearbook and city yearbooks. The specific value of the standard equivalent can be calculated and applied to quantify and compare different ecosystem services.

2.4. Moran’s I Index

Inter-county ESV spatial distributions within the source basin were analyzed through Moran’s I autocorrelation testing [23]. Moran’s I index measures the degree to which similar values tend to cluster together in spatial data, and is used to reflect the overall spatial autocorrelation strength throughout the study area with a single value. x e x ¯ 2 : The deviation between the values of different regions multiplied by spatial deviation and the average value. x e x ¯ x j x ¯ : Multiplying the deviations of two regions (i and j), the positive or negative value of this product represents the degree of similarity between the two regions. W e j : representing the spatial relationship between region e and region j, and weighting the “trend similarity” between all adjacent regions. Moran’s I is −1~1. Moran’s I > 0 signifies spatial clustering, I < 0 denotes dispersion, and values approaching 0 suggest random spatial distribution. The calculation formula is as follows:
I = n e = 1 n j = 1 n W e j × e = 1 n j = 1 n W e j x e x ¯ x j x ¯ e = 1 n x e x ¯ 2
where I is Moran’s I index; n is the number of spatial units; xe and xj are the attribute values of the location where evaluation units e and j are located, respectively; and Wej is the spatial weight adjacency matrix.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Changes in Land Use Types

The changes in land use types identified by remote sensing images from 2002 to 2022 are shown in Table 2. In 2002, the majority of land use types were cultivated land, forests, and grasslands, accounting for 390,800 ha, 621,700 ha, and 1,691,800 ha, respectively, with proportions of 13%, 21%, and 59%. In 2012, the majority of land use types were forests and grasslands, accounting for 641,900 hectares and 2.3066 million hectares, respectively, with proportions of 21% and 76%. In 2022, the majority of land use types were forests and grasslands, accounting for 1.0843 million hectares and 2.4155 million hectares, respectively, with proportions of 30% and 68%. Cultivable acreage has plummeted 91% over the last two decades, and the proportions of bare land and water have decreased by 84% and 91%, respectively. Forests and grasslands showed an increasing trend, increasing by 74% and 43%, respectively. National ecological conservation policies and land use reconfigurations partially explain observed land use transitions. Notably, sustained implementation of initiatives like “Grain for Green” (GFG) has accelerated the transformation of cropland into forest and grassland ecosystems [24,25]. This pattern is consistent with findings from other ecologically vulnerable areas in western China, where policy interventions and ecological restoration efforts have jointly contributed to the gradual recovery of natural ecosystems [26].
Meanwhile, the substantial reduction in barren land and water bodies may be influenced by a combination of factors, including climatic variability, hydrological regulation, and potential limitations in remote sensing classification accuracy. To better understand the underlying drivers of these changes, future research should consider integrating ground-based observations with meteorological and hydrological datasets to enhance the explanatory power of land use change analyses.

3.2. Ecosystem Service Value of Districts in the Water Source Area

Figure 3a–e illustrate the 2002 ESV distribution across the water source area, totaling CNY 108.45 billion. Garzê Prefecture’s ESV exceeded Aba Prefecture’s during this period. The lowest among them was Jinchuan county; the highest was Daofu county. Xiaojin county and Luhuo county were both relatively high, at CNY 10.97 billion and CNY 7.51 billion, respectively. Service value composition: provisioning 7%; regulating 68%; supporting 21%; cultural 4%. Regulating and supporting services collectively accounted for 89% of total ESV. The largest proportion of regulating services was hydrological regulation and climate regulation, while the largest proportion of supporting services was biodiversity. The largest proportions of provisioning services were water resource supply and raw material production. The provisioning service was CNY 7.248 billion, with Jinchuan county having the lowest provisioning value and Daofu county having the highest value of CNY 679 million. Xiaojin county, Luhuo county, Luding county, and Xinlong county have higher values of CNY 670 million, CNY 422 million, CNY 321 million, and CNY 318 million, respectively. The value of regulatory services is CNY 68.589 billion, with Jinchuan county having the lowest regulatory value, Daofu county having the highest, and Xiaojin county, Luhuo county, Xinlong county, Luding county, and Hongyuan county having higher regulatory values of CNY 6.816 billion, CNY 4.75 billion, CNY 3.569 billion, CNY 3.147 billion, and CNY 2.78 billion, respectively. The values of supporting services and cultural services were CNY 21.092 billion and CNY 4.274 billion, respectively. The distribution of the highest supporting services and cultural services was consistent across the counties. Daofu county, Xiaojin county, Luhuo county, Xinlong county, and Aba county had higher supporting services, at CNY 2.731 billion, CNY 2.336 billion, CNY 1.593 billion, CNY 1.041 billion, and CNY 964 billion, respectively.
Figure 4a–e depict the 2012 ESV distribution across the water source area, totaling CNY 158.45 billion, with Garzê Prefecture exhibiting higher ESV than Aba Prefecture. The lowest was Seda county; the highest was Xinlong county. Danba county and Banma county were both relatively high, at CNY 24.91 billion and CNY 23.346 billion, respectively. The proportion of provisioning services, regulating services, supporting services, and cultural services was 8%, 64%, 23%, and 5%, respectively, with regulating services and supporting services accounting for 87% of the value of ecological services. Hydrological and climate regulation dominated regulating services, while biodiversity constituted the primary supporting service. The largest proportions of provisioning services were water resource supply and raw material production. The provisioning services value was CNY 12.747 billion, with Songpan county having the lowest provisioning services value and Xinlong county having the highest value of CNY 2.592 billion. Banma county, Danba county, Daofu county, and Rangtang county have higher values: CNY 1.91 billion, CNY 1.889 billion, CNY 1.85 billion, and CNY 1.588 billion, respectively. The value of regulatory services was CNY 101.596 billion, with Songpan county having the lowest regulatory value and Xinlong county having the highest value, at CNY 20.508 billion. Danba county, Daofu county, Bama county, and Rangtang county have higher regulatory values of CNY 16.109 billion, CNY 14.783 billion, CNY 14.782 billion, and CNY 12.28 billion, respectively. The value of supporting services and cultural services was CNY 36.704 billion and CNY 7.407 billion, respectively. The distribution of the highest supporting services and cultural services was consistent among the counties, with Xinlong county, Danba county, Bama county, Daofu county, and Rangtang county having higher supporting services, at CNY 7.57 billion, CNY 5.754 billion, CNY 5.536 billion, CNY 5.454 billion, and CNY 4.601 billion, respectively.
The ESV of the water source area in 2022 was also investigated (Figure 5a–e). The ESV in 2022 was CNY 198.518 billion, and the ESV of Garzê Prefecture was greater than that of Aba Prefecture. Lixian county had the lowest ESV; Xinlong county had the highest. Daofu county and Danba county were both relatively high, at CNY 31.547 billion and CNY 25.203 billion, respectively. Ecosystem service values comprised provisioning (6%), regulating (65%), supporting (24%), and cultural (5%) categories, where regulating and supporting services collectively constituted 89% of total ESV. Hydrological/climate regulation dominated regulating services, while biodiversity represented the primary supporting service component. The largest proportions of provisioning services were water resource supply and raw material production. The supplying service value was CNY 12.126 billion, with Songpan county having the lowest value and Xinlong county having the highest at CNY 1.988 billion. Daofu county, Danba county, Rangtang county, and Banma county have higher values of CNY 1.912 billion, CNY 1.48 billion, CNY 1.476 billion, and CNY 1.414 billion, respectively. The value of regulating services was CNY 129.871 billion, with Songpan county having the lowest regulating value and Xinlong county having the highest at CNY 207.44 billion. Daofu county, Danba county, Rangtang county, and Banma county have higher regulatory values of CNY 20.605 billion, CNY 16.583 billion, CNY 15.374 billion, and CNY 14.364 billion, respectively. The values of supporting services and cultural services were CNY 47.039 billion and CNY 9.482 billion, respectively. The distribution of the highest supporting services and cultural services was consistent among the counties, with Xinlong county, Daofu county, Danba county, Rangtang county, and Banma county having higher supporting services, at CNY 7.671 billion, CNY 7.516 billion, CNY 5.944 billion, CNY 5.696 billion, and CNY 5.386 billion, respectively.
The ecosystem service values of different cities in the water source area of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project were calculated for the years 2002, 2012, and 2022 (Table 3). The ESVs of water source areas in 2002, 2012, and 2022 were CNY 101.202 billion, CNY 158.453 billion, and CNY 198.518 billion, respectively. In the past 20 years, the ESV has shown an upward trend year by year, increasing by 96%. The regions with the highest ESV were Garzê Prefecture and Aba Prefecture, which increased by 130.3% and 60.6%, respectively, over the past 20 years. The value of ecological services in Xinlong, Danba, Litang, and Daofu counties has increased significantly, by 4.8, 1.5, 12.5, and 8.9 times, respectively, over the past 20 years, suggesting that localized ecological restoration and land management policies have achieved positive results. In terms of land use types, farmland has decreased by 91%, while water bodies have decreased by 98%; forests and grasslands have increased by 1.6 times and 40 times, respectively. Forests and grasslands play a crucial role in climate regulation, hydrological regulation, and maintaining biodiversity. This structural shift has had a profound impact on regional ecosystem functioning. Forests and grasslands play key roles in climate regulation, hydrological cycle, and biodiversity maintenance, especially in high-altitude areas where ecosystems are more fragile but have higher potential for ecological services [27]. The results of this study are consistent with previous research on ecosystem evolution in mountainous areas of western China, which concluded that the area covered by natural ecosystems has continued to expand under the combined effects of policy intervention and ecological restoration [28]. Therefore, accurate quantification of regional ESV is important for improving public ecological awareness, promoting the construction of ecological compensation mechanisms, and supporting land use policy formulation [29].

3.3. Moran’s I Index of ESV

Moran’s I indexes of ESVs from 2002 to 2022 are shown in Table 4. The p-value was used to determine the significance of spatial autocorrelation. The z-value was used to evaluate the degree of deviation between Moran’s I index and the expected random distribution, helping to explain whether the data have a tendency toward clustering or dispersion in space. Moran’s I index itself was used to quantify the strength of spatial autocorrelation, helping to determine whether data were positively or negatively correlated. It can be seen from Moran’s I index values that the dataset as a whole showed a slight positive spatial autocorrelation, and this spatial autocorrelation gradually increased from −0.041396 to 0.046377 over the past 20 years.

4. Conclusions

In this study, based on the equivalent factor method, combined with remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) techniques, we quantitatively evaluated the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of ESV in water source areas in typical years (2002, 2012, and 2022), and revealed its spatial agglomeration and distribution pattern through the Moran index. The results show that the growth of ESV has significant spatial heterogeneity, and some counties, such as Xinlong, Litang, and Daofu, have significant growth in ecological value, indicating that the effectiveness of local ecological management is beginning to be realized. Collectively, this research elucidates alpine ecosystem service dynamics while informing regional ecological compensation, territorial spatial optimization, and ecological restoration policy design. Advancing ecosystem service applications for sustainable development requires synthesizing multi-source climate, socioeconomic, and field data to decode human–nature interdependencies.

Author Contributions

Methodology, B.Y.; Validation, Y.L.; Formal analysis, B.L.; Investigation, X.X.; Data curation, Y.Y.; Writing—original draft, F.X.; Writing—review & editing, Z.D.; Funding acquisition, S.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work is financially supported by the ecological compensation mechanism and biological invasion risk analysis for water diversion in the Western Route Project (2022YFC3202404). The funder is Shuhu Xiao.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Guo, H.; Song, X.; Leng, P.; Zhu, X.; Hu, R.; Guo, D.; Gao, L.; Wang, Y.; Xue, K. Higher water ecological service values have better network connectivity in the middle Yellow River basin. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 160, 111797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Costanza, R.; de Groot, R.; Sutton, P.; van der Ploeg, S.; Anderson, S.J.; Kubiszewski, I.; Farber, S.; Turner, R.K. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Change 2014, 26, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Daily, G.C. Management objectives for the protection of ecosystem services. Environ. Sci. Policy 2000, 3, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kang, Z.; Ling, H.; Gong, Y.; Yan, J.; Han, F.; Shan, Q.; Zhang, G. The precise implementation of the ecological water transfer project effectively promotes the enhancement of desert riparian ecosystem service value in the mainstream of Tarim River. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 169, 112914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Richter, F.; Jan, P.; El Benni, N.; Lüscher, A.; Buchmann, N.; Klaus, V.H. A guide to assess and value ecosystem services of grasslands. Ecosyst. Serv. 2021, 52, 101376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jiang, W.; Wu, T.; Fu, B. The value of ecosystem services in China: A systematic review for twenty years. Ecosyst. Serv. 2021, 52, 101365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fang, J.; Xu, L.; Lu, Q. Ecological security patterns of Chinese lakes based on ecosystem service values assessment and human threat factors evaluation. Ecol. Inform. 2024, 82, 102754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guo, X.; Liu, Z.; Chen, M.; Liu, J.; Yang, M. Decentralized wastewater treatment technologies and management in Chinese villages. Front. Env. Sci. Eng. 2014, 8, 929–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xie, G.; Zhang, C.; Zhen, L.; Zhang, L. Dynamic changes in the value of China’s ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 26, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pan, N.; Guan, Q.; Wang, Q.; Sun, Y.; Li, H.; Ma, Y. Spatial differentiation and driving mechanisms in ecosystem service value of Arid region: A case study in the middle and lower reaches of Shule River Basin, NW China. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 319, 128718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lu, Z.; Feng, Q.; Xie, J.; Yin, Z.; Zhu, M.; Xu, M. The reallocation of water and ecosystem service values in arid ecosystems with the implementation of an ecological water diversion project. Appl. Water Sci. 2023, 13, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Su, K.; Wei, D.Z.; Lin, W.X. Evaluation of ecosystem services value and its implications for policy making in China—A case study of Fujian province. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 108, 105752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, L.; Fang, C.; Zhu, C.; Gao, Q. Ecosystem service trade-offs and identification of eco-optimal regions in urban agglomerations in arid regions of China. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 373, 133823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zheng, Y.; Sang, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, S.; Chang, J. Ecological services value of ‘natural-artificial’ water cycle: Valuation method and its application in the Yangtze River Basin of China. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 158, 111324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Costanza, R.; d’Arge, R.; De Groot, R.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; O’neill, R.V.; Paruelo, J.; et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Estoque, R. A review of the sustainability concept and the state of SDG monitoring using remote sensing. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guo, H.; Chen, F.; Sun, Z.; Liu, J.; Liang, D. Big Earth Data: A practice of sustainability science to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Sci. Bull 2021, 66, 1050–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, R.M.; Li, L.; Guo, L.J.; Jiao, L.J.; Wang, Y.F.; Cao, L.P.; Wang, Y. Multiscenario simulation of ecological risk assessment based on ecosystem service values in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2022, 194, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cao, Y.; Kong, L.; Zhang, L.; Ouyang, Z. The balance between economic development and ecosystem service value in the process of land urbanization: A case study of China’s land urbanization from 2000 to 2015. Land Use Policy 2021, 108, 105536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tan, L.; Luo, W.; Yang, B.; Huang, M.; Shuai, S.; Cheng, C.; Zhou, X.; Li, M.; Hu, C. Evaluation of landscape ecological risk in key ecological functional zone of South–to–North Water Diversion Project, China. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 147, 109934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kang, Y.; Cheng, C.; Liu, X.; Zhang, F.; Li, Z.; Lu, S. An ecosystem services value assessment of land-use change in Chengdu: Based on a modification of scarcity factor. Phys. Chem. Earth 2019, 110, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, S.; Wu, T.; Guo, L.; Zhao, Y. Assessing ecological risk on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau based on future land use scenarios and ecosystem service values. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 154, 110769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qin, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Q.; Song, Y.; Peng, M.; Cheng, H. Driving factors of soil selenium accumulation in regional enrichment area at selenium-deficient soil belt of China: An enlightenment of Moran’s index and machine learning. J. Geochem. Explor. 2025, 274, 107746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, J.; Li, S.; Ouyang, Z.; Tam, C.; Chen, X. Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China’s policies for ecosystem services. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 9477–9482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hua, F.; Wang, X.; Zheng, X.; Fisher, B.; Wang, L.; Zhu, J.; Tang, Y.; Yu, D.W.; Wilcove, D.S. Opportunities for biodiversity gains under the world’s largest reforestation programme. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, J.; Zhao, W.; Wang, G.; Yang, S.; Pereira, P. Effects of long-term affore station and natural grassland recovery on soil properties and quality in Loess Plateau (China). Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 770, 144833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Grêt-Regamey, A.; Brunner, S.H.; Altwegg, J.; Bebi, P. Facing uncertainty in ecosystem services-based resource management. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 127, S145–S154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Schirpke, U.; Tasser, E.; Tappeiner, U. Predicting scenic beauty of mountain regions. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 111, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pascual, U.; Balvanera, P.; Díaz, S.; Pataki, G.; Roth, E.; Stenseke, M.; Watson, R.T.; Başak Dessane, E.; Islar, M.; Kelemen, E.; et al. Valuing nature’s contributions to people: The IPBES approach. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2017, 26, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The water source area of the Western Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project involves administrative districts and counties.
Figure 1. The water source area of the Western Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project involves administrative districts and counties.
Water 17 02305 g001
Figure 2. Land use types in water source areas from 2002 to 2022. (a) 2002; (b) 2012; (c) 2022.
Figure 2. Land use types in water source areas from 2002 to 2022. (a) 2002; (b) 2012; (c) 2022.
Water 17 02305 g002aWater 17 02305 g002b
Figure 3. ESV of water source area in 2002. (a) ESV in 2002; (b) provisioning service; (c) regulating services; (d) supporting services; (e) cultural services.
Figure 3. ESV of water source area in 2002. (a) ESV in 2002; (b) provisioning service; (c) regulating services; (d) supporting services; (e) cultural services.
Water 17 02305 g003aWater 17 02305 g003b
Figure 4. ESV of the water source area in 2012. (a) ESV in 2012; (b) provisioning service; (c) regulating services; (d) supporting services; (e) cultural services.
Figure 4. ESV of the water source area in 2012. (a) ESV in 2012; (b) provisioning service; (c) regulating services; (d) supporting services; (e) cultural services.
Water 17 02305 g004aWater 17 02305 g004b
Figure 5. ESV of water source area in 2022. (a) ESV in 2022; (b) provisioning service; (c) regulating services; (d) supporting services; (e) cultural services.
Figure 5. ESV of water source area in 2022. (a) ESV in 2022; (b) provisioning service; (c) regulating services; (d) supporting services; (e) cultural services.
Water 17 02305 g005aWater 17 02305 g005b
Table 1. Statistical data sources from 2002 to 2022.
Table 1. Statistical data sources from 2002 to 2022.
DataData Sources
Land use dataInstitute of Geographic Sciences and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Resource Environmental Science and Data Center
China City Yearbook
Crop-related dataChina Statistical Yearbook (2002–2022)
National average price of food cropsCompilation of National Data on Costs and Returns of Agricultural Products (2002–2022)
Table 2. Changes in land use types from 2002 to 2022.
Table 2. Changes in land use types from 2002 to 2022.
Land Use Types200220122022
Area (ha)Proportion (%)Area (ha)Proportion (%)Area (ha)Proportion (%)
Cultivated land390,80013.6356,4001.8633,8000.95
Forests621,70021.68641,90021.201,084,30030.51
Grasslands1,691,80058.982,306,60076.192,415,50067.96
Wetland250.00170.00150.00
Bare land86,5003.0110,0000.3313,7000.39
Water bodies77,4002.7012,3000.4167000.19
Table 3. Changes in ESV from 2002 to 2022 at city (prefecture) level.
Table 3. Changes in ESV from 2002 to 2022 at city (prefecture) level.
CityESV (CNY 100 Million)ΔESV (%)
2002201220222012–20022022–20122022–2002
Garzê Prefecture431.64858.50993.910.990.161.30
Aba Prefecture248.60283.64399.260.140.410.61
Liangshan144.2398.38192.51−0.320.960.33
Leshan84.9023.4424.77−0.720.06−0.71
Panzhihua35.282.422.99−0.930.24−0.92
Yaan25.7379.59145.032.090.824.64
Yushu Prefecture4.17118.2250.2827.35−0.5711.06
Guoluo Prefecture20.56236.05225.0210.48−0.059.94
Lijiang16.901.471.35−0.91−0.08−0.92
Table 4. Moran’s I index of ESV from 2002 to 2022.
Table 4. Moran’s I index of ESV from 2002 to 2022.
YearMoran’s I Indexzp
2002−0.041396−0.317050.751202
2012−0.004779−0.2098760.833788
20220.0463770.8867320.375223
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Du, Z.; Li, B.; Yan, B.; Xing, F.; Xiao, S.; Xu, X.; Yuan, Y.; Liu, Y. Changes of Ecosystem Service Value in the Water Source Area of the West Route of the South–North Water Diversion Project. Water 2025, 17, 2305. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17152305

AMA Style

Du Z, Li B, Yan B, Xing F, Xiao S, Xu X, Yuan Y, Liu Y. Changes of Ecosystem Service Value in the Water Source Area of the West Route of the South–North Water Diversion Project. Water. 2025; 17(15):2305. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17152305

Chicago/Turabian Style

Du, Zhimin, Bo Li, Bingfei Yan, Fei Xing, Shuhu Xiao, Xiaohe Xu, Yakun Yuan, and Yongzhi Liu. 2025. "Changes of Ecosystem Service Value in the Water Source Area of the West Route of the South–North Water Diversion Project" Water 17, no. 15: 2305. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17152305

APA Style

Du, Z., Li, B., Yan, B., Xing, F., Xiao, S., Xu, X., Yuan, Y., & Liu, Y. (2025). Changes of Ecosystem Service Value in the Water Source Area of the West Route of the South–North Water Diversion Project. Water, 17(15), 2305. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17152305

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop