Next Article in Journal
Urban Flood Risk Assessment Based on DEMATEL-ANP Hybrid Fuzzy Evaluation and Hydrodynamic Model
Previous Article in Journal
The Salinity Difference and Clay Mineral Types Affect the Distribution of Microplastics in the Seabed: New Evidence from the Western North Yellow Sea
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mechanisms of Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid Retention in Low-Permeability Aquifer Lenses: Effects on Contaminant Remediation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Soil–Groundwater Environmental Quality and Water Resource: Assessment of Contaminant Sources, Species, and Transformations

1
Tianjin Center, China Geological Survey, Tianjin 300170, China
2
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Coast Geological Processes and Environmental Safety, Tianjin 300170, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2025, 17(10), 1493; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17101493
Submission received: 28 April 2025 / Accepted: 14 May 2025 / Published: 15 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil and Groundwater Quality and Resources Assessment)

1. Introduction

Globally, 80% of the world’s population are at high risk of water scarcity, with global water scarcity increasing due to climate change, population growth, and economic development [1,2,3,4]. As the largest available fresh water and key component of the global water cycle, groundwater provides a valuable water resource for the vast majority of the population, supplying river flow, lakes or wetlands, industrial–agricultural activities, ecosystem health, and sustainable development [5,6,7,8]. However, under the influence of climate change and high-intensity human activities, groundwater resources and security have suffered a serious crisis [7,9,10]. This problem has attracted the attention of many countries, and it is also a hotspot and crucial problem in hydrogeology and hydrology [1,8,11]. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the changes in groundwater resources and quality, along with the factors influencing them, is essential to ensure sustainable groundwater resources for humans and ecosystems.
Human activities, particularly in regions experiencing the development of industry and agriculture and exploitation of mineral resources, pose increasing threats to terrestrial ecosystems and groundwater environments [1,8]. This situation is critical in areas facing water scarcity, where groundwater serves as the primary source of drinking water. Such concerns center around water depletion, soil–groundwater environment deterioration, and ecological–health risks associated with various contaminants [1,12]. The concentrations of contaminants in these ecosystems are complex due to complex hydrogeological conditions, long-term water–rock interactions, diverse groundwater recharge patterns, hydrologic–biogeochemical processes, and intensive human exploitation [7,13,14]. Notably, the threat extends to both traditional and emerging inorganic and organic pollutants, which find their way into human bodies via bioaccumulation, food chains, and drinking water, thus leading to health risks such as chemical toxicity, radiation exposure, and carcinogenic effects. Thus, the synergetic effects of natural and anthropogenic drivers further complicate conventional groundwater quality and resource problems.
Faced with increasingly severe water scarcity and ecological environment deterioration, there is an urgent need to carry out in-depth and detailed research on groundwater quality and resource management, as well as the type, sources, and mobilization and transformation of various contaminants. Meanwhile, on the basis of traditional methods such as numerical simulation, hydrogeochemistry, and environmental isotopic tracer (C, N, S, H, O, etc.), it is imperative to explore advances in technologies or methods such as remote sensing techniques, emerging datasets, machine learning, earth system models, and non-traditional stable isotopes (Fe, Ca, Mg, B, Li, Br, Cl, etc.). Leveraging these innovations is essential for scientifically managing groundwater resources and uncovering the sources, mobilization, and transformation of contaminants [1,4,6,7,15,16,17,18,19,20].
This Special Issue, entitled “Soil and Groundwater Quality and Resources Assessment”, synthesizes interdisciplinary investigations into hydrological mechanisms, contaminant transport processes, and sustainable resource management strategies. Through systematic analysis of 17 peer-reviewed studies, this collection elucidates critical advancements and persistent barriers in groundwater quality preservation and resource governance. Crucially, the compiled works collectively advance methodological frameworks for quantifying climate change or anthropogenic impacts on contaminant fate and aquifer systems and optimize remediation protocols through coupled experimental–numerical approaches. By elucidating contamination pathways, remediation strategies, and resource allocation models, these studies reinforce the scientific foundation for ecosystem preservation while addressing technical and policy implementation gaps.

2. Hydrological Processes and Water Resources

Emerging research highlights the intensification of hydrological stress and water resource instability under combined climatic change and anthropogenic perturbations, critically constraining water accessibility for both societal and ecological systems across multiple regions [1,8,21]. Chen’s predictive modeling (contribution 1), integrating remote sensing datasets with statistical methods, has demonstrated significant runoff reductions in the Miyun Reservoir Basin, primarily attributed to shifting precipitation regimes and urban expansion. Concurrently, the hydrogeological suitability evaluated by Meng et al. (contribution 2) in the Erlian Basin has optimized in situ uranium leaching (ISL) operations through geochemical and permeability analyses, achieving equilibrium between mineral exploitation and aquifer preservation. Yang and Mirjat (contribution 3) determined the hydrogeological characterization of the Tando Allahyar aquifer through coupled pumping tests and numerical simulations to quantify aquifer parameters and evaluate the risks of saline intrusion during prolonged extraction. The innovative field experiments carried out by Wang et al. (contribution 4) further demonstrate the technical viability of sandstone reservoir reinjection in Tianjin’s geothermal systems, presenting dual solutions for energy production and aquifer conservation. These investigations collectively highlight the compounding impacts of precipitation variability and human interventions on water resource sustainability.
Concurrently, coastal and arid zone aquifers face escalating challenges regarding both water quality and quantity. For example, through a comprehensive analysis of Southern China’s coastal groundwater systems, He et al. (contribution 5) identified four dominant controls on hydrochemistry, including mineral weathering, evaporative concentration, seawater intrusion, and anthropogenic inputs. Also, it was found that the sources of nitrate present distinct spatial heterogeneity, which provides new insights into groundwater pollution in the coastal zone. The complementary studies in Xilinhot’s grassland aquifers by Xia et al. (contribution 6) establish that livestock operations and mineral dissolution jointly govern groundwater quality patterns, exposing the vulnerability of the ecological environment and water resources in cold arid regions under intensified human pressures. Si’s critical investigations (contribution 7) in typical districts of Ordos city elucidate the cyclical changes in chloride ions in groundwater systems, quantitatively differentiating contamination contributions from natural geochemical processes versus human pollution sources in arid environments.
These findings underscore the need to prioritize groundwater quality research, given its equivalent significance to water security compared to quantity concerns, particularly as groundwater sustains potable water supplies for approximately 50% of the global population [6,7].

3. Contaminant Assessment and Sources

Soil–groundwater contamination assessment and the sources controlled by intense climate change and intensified human activities are long-term global challenges [21,22,23]. Under the combined influence of multiple factors, physical–chemical–biological processes such as the leaching, dissolution, desorption, enrichment, degradation, and transformation of various contaminants occur and migrate underground through surface water–soil–groundwater interactions [12]. Additionally, the extraction of groundwater, hydrogeological features, geogenic hazardous substances, dominant hydrogeochemical processes, and key factors have been verified to control the occurrence of geogenic contaminated groundwater [21,24,25,26,27,28,29].
For instance, the co-enrichment mechanism of arsenic and fluorine in the Aksu River Basin uncovered by Ji et al. (contribution 8), posing significant health risks, is attributed to the synergistic effect of a weak reducing alkaline groundwater environment and strong evaporative concentration, and this phenomenon is increasingly observed in arid areas. Notably, Zhu’s research (contribution 9) and Liu’s study (contribution 10) confirmed that heavy metal contamination caused by human activities, particularly in mining-affected regions and intensive agricultural zones, remains an urgent problem, as evidenced by topsoil in the Qaidam Basin and water sediments in the Baiyangdian Lake. Advanced source apportionment methodologies, integrating positive matrix factorization (PMF) with principal component analysis (PCA), successfully discriminate between geogenic weathering signatures and anthropogenic emission fingerprints, enabling targeted risk mitigation strategies.

4. Mobilization and Transformation

Contaminants, both geogenic (arsenic, fluoride, uranium) and anthropogenic (heavy metal, pesticides, PAHs, microplastics, emerging pollutants), exhibit complex speciation, mobility, and toxicity [12,21,22,24,25,26,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Their distribution and transformations are governed by hydrogeological heterogeneity, biogeochemical cycling, and land-use interactions. Notably, emerging contaminants such as endocrine disruptors, antibiotic resistance genes, PFASs, rare earth elements, etc., have gradually attracted worldwide attention. Their occurrence form, mobilization and transformation, biotoxicity, and treatment technology in groundwater systems have become research hotspots in recent years [34,36,37,38,39,40,41]. Recent work has advanced our understanding of the contaminants that migrate and transform through soil–groundwater systems via leaching, sorption, redox shifts, and biological mediation.
Some case studies have advanced our understanding of contaminant transport mechanisms and remediation strategies across diverse environmental systems. In the Yangtze River iron mining district, Zeng et al. (contribution 11) adopted sequential chemical extraction protocols combined with leaching simulations under rainfall conditions to clarify the migration dynamics of potentially toxic elements (PTEs). They demonstrated critical associations between spatial distribution patterns, weathering processes, and resultant ecological risks. Furthermore, batch experiments, explored by Yang and Wang (contribution 12), have quantified petroleum pollutants’ transport mechanisms and differentiation processes in vadose zones, revealing that medium–low-permeability strata combined with elevated moisture content effectively suppress nonaqueous-phase liquid (NAPL) migration and volatilization. Meanwhile, recent pore-scale investigations in low-permeability aquifers conducted by Sun et al. (contribution 13) have identified capillary heterogeneity as a primary control on NAPL retention. Their experiments reveal the hindrance of capillary action to remediation work and challenge conventional remediation approaches. The concurrent technological innovations by Yang and Zhang (contribution 14) demonstrate synergistic effects when combining slow-release oxygen materials with specialized microbial consortia. The 98% BTEX degradation efficiency on the field scale marks a breakthrough in the in situ repair progress of bioenhancement technology.
These findings collectively underscore the necessity for characterizing and simulating the mobilization and transformation of contaminants across surface–subsurface hydrological continua to inform sustainable groundwater management. To confront this challenge effectively, in-depth and comprehensive research is imperative to uncover the sources of these pollutants and assess their potential impacts on human health and ecosystems [40,42,43].

5. Challenges and New Techniques

Emerging as a critical priority in global water security, comprehensive groundwater resource evaluation requires the systematic integration of quantity and quality assessments to address escalating ecological degradation. Sustaining aquifer ecosystem integrity constitutes a complex challenge necessitating interdisciplinary solutions, where pollutant dynamics (sources, species, mobilization, transformation, and fate) exhibit significant complexity due to synergistic interactions between natural and anthropogenic drivers. These include climate change, land-use practices, groundwater extraction intensity, the heterogeneity of water-bearing media, the complexity of hydrogeological structures, hydrodynamic conditions, and their coupling with geochemical or biogeochemical processes. Such multifaceted interactions fundamentally govern contaminant migration pathways while posing substantial challenges to predictive modeling and sustainable management frameworks.
In response, there is an urgent need to develop and adopt innovative methods and technologies for effectively identifying and managing groundwater resources and quality. Since the late 20th century, advancements in satellite technology, data science, information systems, and experimental testing have enabled the exploration of cutting-edge approaches. These include remote sensing techniques [18,19,44], emerging datasets [45,46], machine learning [34,35,47], advanced geological and hydrological models [8,48], contaminant migration modeling [49,50], and non-traditional stable isotopes [16,51]. Such innovations are crucial for achieving the scientific and sustainable management of groundwater resources and ensuring water quality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.J. and Y.S.; writing—original draft preparation, W.J. writing—review and editing, Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42302299).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the authors who contributed and will contribute to this Special Issue. We would also like to thank all the reviewers for providing their valuable comments, which have greatly improved the quality of the published papers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Chen, S.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, F.; Zhang, J.; Ning, H. Analysis of Runoff Variation Characteristics and Influencing Factors in the Typical Watershed of Miyun Reservoir, China. Water 2025, 17, 442.
  • Meng, L.; Ning, H.; Jiang, W.; Sheng, Y.; Wang, W.; Tang, C. Comprehensive Study on Hydrogeological Conditions and Suitability Evaluation of In Situ Leaching for Sandstone-Hosted Uranium Deposit in Erlian Basin. Water 2024, 16, 2785.
  • Yang, X.; Mirjat, M.U.; Baloch, A.; Talpur, M.A.; Kori, S.M.; Soothar, R.K.; Shaikh, S.A.; Mari, I.A.; Chandio, F.A. The Characterization of Aquifer Parameters in Using Skimming Tubewells Through the Pumping Test Method: A Case Study of Tando Allahyar. Water 2024, 16, 3180.
  • Wang, B.; Zhao, Y.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, S.; Yang, B.; Liu, F. Feasibility Research on Surface Water Reinjection into the Sandstone Geothermal Reservoir of the Guantao Formation in Tianjin Based on Laboratory Experiments. Water 2024, 16, 2475.
  • He, J.; Wu, P.; Li, Y.; Zeng, M.; Chen, C.; Jakada, H.; Zhao, X. Comprehending Spatial Distribution and Controlling Mechanisms of Groundwater in Topical Coastal Aquifers of Southern China Based on Hydrochemical Evaluations. Water 2024, 16, 2502.
  • Xia, Y.; Chen, G.; Liu, F.; Zhang, J.; Ning, H. Hydrogeochemical Characteristics and Health Risk Assessment of Groundwater in Grassland Watersheds of Cold and Arid Regions in Xilinhot, China. Water 2024, 16, 2488.
  • Si, L.; Zhang, B.; Zhou, R.; Jiang, R.; Dong, W.; Ma, R.; Liu, S. Study on the Evolution Mechanism of Temporal Variability of Chloride Ions in Typical Districts of Ordos City. Water 2024, 16, 2935.
  • Ji, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, X.; Zhou, J.; Sun, Y.; Lei, M. Distribution and Co-Enrichment Factors of Arsenic and Fluoride in the Groundwater of the Plain Area of the Aksu River Basin, Xinjiang, PR China. Water 2024, 16, 3201.
  • Zhu, M.; Yao, Z.; Xu, X.; Wei, Y.; Yan, X.; Xiao, M. Accumulation, Source Apportionment, and Ecological-Health Risks Assessment of Topsoil Heavy Metals in Agricultural and Pastoral Areas in the Eastern Qaidam Basin, China. Water 2024, 16, 3719.
  • Liu, H.; Bai, Y.; Gao, Y.; Han, B.; Miao, J.; Shi, Y.; Yang, F. Status, Sources, and Risks of Heavy Metals in Surface Sediments of Baiyangdian Lake and Inflow Rivers, North China. Water 2024, 16, 2723.
  • Zeng, Y.; Xu, Z.; Dong, B. Spatial Distribution, Leaching Characteristics, and Ecological and Health Risk Assessment of Potential Toxic Elements in a Typical Open-Pit Iron Mine Along the Yangzi River. Water 2024, 16, 3017.
  • Yang, M.; Wang, B.; Xia, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Li, C.; Cao, Z. Changing Soil Water Content: Main Trigger of the Multi-Phase Mobilization and Transformation of Petroleum Pollution Components—Insights from the Batch Experiments. Water 2024, 16, 1775.
  • Sun, W.; Wang, S.; Yu, J.; Lin, H.; Sun, L. Mechanisms of Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid Retention in Low-Permeability Aquifer Lenses: Effects on Contaminant Remediation. Water 2025, 17, 573.
  • Yang, S.; Zhang, S.; Ma, S.; Zhao, S.; Liu, Z. Field Demonstration of In Situ Slow-Release Oxygen Chemicals Coupled with Microbial Agents for Injection to Remediate BTEX Contamination. Water 2024, 16, 2815.

References

  1. Scanlon, B.R.; Fakhreddine, S.; Rateb, A.; de Graa, I.; Famiglietti, J.; Gleeson, T.; Grafton, R.Q.; Jobbagy, E.; Kebede, S.; Kolusu, S.R.; et al. Global water resources and the role of groundwater in a resilient water future. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2023, 4, 87–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Srivastava, S.; Mehta, L.; Naess, L.O. Increased attention to water is key to adaptation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2022, 12, 113–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xiao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, H.; Wang, L.W.; Han, J.B.; Hao, Q.C.; Wang, J.; Zhao, Z.; Hu, W.X.; Wang, S.B.; et al. Interaction regimes of surface waterand groundwater in a hyper-aridendorheic watershed on TibetanPlateau: Insights from multi-proxydata. J. Hydrol. 2024, 644, 132020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xie, J.; Liu, X.; Jasechko, S.; Berghuijs, W.; Wang, K.; Liu, C.; Reichstein, M.; Jung, M.; Koirala, S. Majority of global river flow sustained by groundwater. Nat. Geosci. 2024, 2024. 17, 770–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cuthbert, M.O.; Gleeson, T.; Moosdorf, N.; Befus, K.M.; Schneider, A.; Hartmann, J.; Lehner, B. Global patterns and dynamics of climate-groundwater interactions. Nat. Clim. Change 2019, 9, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rohde, M.M.; Albano, C.M.; Huggins, X.; Klausmeyer, K.R.; Morton, C.; Sharman, A.; Zaveri, E.; Saito, L.; Freed, Z.; Howard, J.K.; et al. Groundwater-dependent ecosystem map exposes global dryland protection needs. Nature 2024, 632, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jasechko, S.; Seybold, H.; Perrone, D.; Fan, Y.; Shamsudduha, M.; Taylor, R.G.; Fallatah, O.; Kirchner, J.W. Rapid groundwater decline and some cases of recovery in aquifers globally. Nature 2024, 625, 715–721. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kuang, X.X.; Liu, J.G.; Scanlon, B.R.; Jiao, J.J.; Jasechko, S.; Lancia, M.; Biskaborn, B.K.; Wada, Y.; Li, H.L.; Zeng, Z.Z.; et al. The changing nature of groundwater in the global water cycle. Science 2024, 383, eadf0630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Niazi, H.; Wild, T.B.; Turner, S.W.D.; Graham, N.T.; Hejazi, M.; Msangi, S.; Kim, S.; Lamontagne, J.R.; Mengqi Zhao, M.Q. Global peak water limit of future groundwater withdrawals. Nat. Sustain. 2024, 7, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Long, D.; Yang, W.; Scanlon, B.R.; Zhao, J.S.; Liu, D.; Burek, P.; Pan, Y.; You, L.Z.; Wada, Y. South-to-North Water Diversion stabilizing Beijing’s groundwater levels. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Thaw, M.; GebreEgziabher, M.; Villafañe-Pagán, J.Y.; Jasechko, S. Modern groundwater reaches deeper depths in heavily pumped aquifer systems. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sheng, Y.Z.; Jiang, J.W.; Zhang, M. Mobilization, Speciation, and Transformation of Organic and Inorganic Contaminants in Soil-Groundwater Ecosystems. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 11454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sheng, Y.; Baars, O.; Guo, D.; Whitham, J.; Srivastava, S.; Dong, H.L. Mineral-bound trace metals as cofactors for anaerobic biological nitrogen fixation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 7206–7216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rohde, M.M.; Stella, J.C.; Singer, M.B.; Roberts, D.A.; Caylor, K.K.; Albano, C.M. Establishing ecological thresholds and targets for groundwater management. Nat. Water. 2024, 2, 312–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jiang, W.J.; Wang, G.C.; Sheng, Y.Z.; Shi, X.M.; Zhang, H. Isotopes in groundwater (2H, 18O, 14C) revealed the climate and groundwater re-charge in the Northern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 666, 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jiang, W.J.; Sheng, Y.Z.; Wang, G.C.; Shi, Z.M.; Liu, F.T.; Zhang, J.; Chen, D.L. Cl, Br, B, Li, and noble gases isotopes to study the origin and evolution of deep groundwater in sedimentary basins, a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2022, 20, 1497–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cao, W.G.; Zhang, Z.; Fu, Y.; Zhao, L.H.; Ren, Y.; Nan, T.; Guo, H.M. Prediction of arsenic and fluoride in groundwater of the North China Plain using enhanced stacking ensemble learning. Water Res. 2024, 259, 121848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Rateb, A.; Scanlon, B.R.; Pool, D.R.; Sun, A.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Chen, J.L.; Clark, B.; Faunt, C.C.; Haugh, C.J.; Hill, M.; et al. Comparison of Groundwater Storage Changes From GRACE Satellites With Monitoring and Modeling of Major U.S. Aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 2020, 56, e2020WR027556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, J.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, C.; Gong, H.; Xu, L.; Huang, Z.; Lu, S. Comparison of groundwater storage changes over losing and gaining aquifers of China using GRACE satellites, modeling and in-situ observations. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 938, 173514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jiang, W.J.; Sheng, Y.Z.; Shi, Z.M.; Guo, H.M.; Chen, X.L.; Mao, H.R.; Liu, F.T.; Ning, H.; Liu, N.N.; Wang, G.C. 2024 Hydrogeochemical characteristics and evolution of formation water in the continental sedimentary basin: A case study in the Qaidam Basin, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 957, 177672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mukherjee, A.; Coomar, P.; Sarkar, S.; Johannesson, K.H.; Fryar, A.E.; Schreiber, M.E.; Ahmed, K.M.; Alam, M.A.; Bhattacharya, P.; Bundschuh, J.; et al. Arsenic and other geogenic contaminants in global groundwater. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2024, 5, 312–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abascal, E.; Gómez-Coma, L.; Ortiz, I.; Ortiz, A. Global diagnosis of nitrate pollution in groundwater and review of removal technologies. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 810, 152233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gandhi, T.P.; Sampath, P.V.; Maliyekkal, S.M. A critical review of uranium contamination in groundwater: Treatment and sludge disposal. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 825, 153947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Y.X.; Li, J.X.; Ma, T.; Xie, X.J.; Deng, Y.M.; Gan, Y.Q. Genesis of geogenic contaminated groundwater: As, F and I. Crit. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 51, 2895–2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, B.; Sun, Z.X.; Guo, Y.D.; Zhou, Z.K.; Wang, X.G.; Ke, P.C. Occurrence characteristics of uranium mineral-related substances in various environmental media in China: A critical review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 441, 129856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liu, X.; Beusen, A.H.W.; van Grinsven, H.J.M.; Wang, J.J.; van Hoek, W.J.; Ran, X.B.; José, M.; Mogollón, J.M.; Bouwman, A.F. Impact of groundwater nitrogen legacy on water quality. Nat. Sustain. 2024, 7, 891–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Podgorski, J.; Berg, M. Global analysis and prediction of fluoride in groundwater. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Podgorski, J.; Berg, M. Global threat of arsenic in groundwater. Science 2020, 368, 845–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aullón, A.A.; Schulz, C.; Bundschuh, J.; Jacks, G.; Thunvik, R.; Gustafsson, J.P.; Mörth, C.M.; Sraceke, O.; Ahmad, A.; Bhattacharya, P. Hydrogeochemical controls on the mobility of arsenic, fluoride and other geogenic co-contaminants in the shallow aquifers of northeastern LaPampa Province in Argentina. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 715, 136671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhou, X.; Sheng, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Jiang, M.Y.; Wang, M.M.; Zhu, Z.H.; Li, G.Y.; Baars, O.; Dong, H.L. Bioavailability of molybdenite to support nitrogen fixation on early Earth by an anoxygenic phototroph. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 2024, 647, 119056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nghiem, A.A.; Prommer, H.; Mozumder, M.R.H.; Siade, A.; Jamieson, J.; Ahmed, K.M.; van Geen, A.; Bostick, B.C. Sulfate reduction accelerates groundwater arsenic contamination even in aquifers with abundant iron oxides. Nat. Water 2023, 1, 151–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ning, H.; Jiang, W.J.; Sheng, Y.Z.; Wang, K.L.; Chen, S.M.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, F.T. Comprehensive evaluation of nitrogen contamination in water ecosystems of the Miyun reservoir watershed, northern China: Distribution, source apportionment and risk assessment. Environ. Geochem. Health 2024, 46, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Vengosh, A.; Coyte, R.M.; Podgorski, J.; Johnson, T.M. A critical review on the occurrence and distribution of the uranium- and tho-rium-decay nuclides and their effect on the quality of groundwater. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 808, 151914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zainab, S.M.; Junaid, M.; Xu, N.; Malik, R.N. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) in ground Water. A global review on dissemination, sources, interactions, environmental and human health risks. Water Res. 2020, 187, 116455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Fernández-Fernández, V.; Ramil, M.; Cela, R.; Rodríguez, I. Occurrence and risk assessment of pesticides and pharmaceuticals in viticulture impacted watersheds from Northwest Spain. Chemosphere 2023, 341, 140098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yun, J.; Yang, Q.; Zhao, C.; Chen, C.Z.; Liu, G.R. Atmospheric emissions of fine particle matter bound rare earth elements from industry. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 9338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhou, J.; Yang, Z.S.; Liu, Q.; Liu, Y.M.; Liu, M.L.; Wang, T.C.; Zhu, L.Y. Insights into Uptake, Translocation, and Transformation Mechanisms of Perfluorophosphinates and Perfluorophosphonates in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. MacLeod, M.; Arp, H.P.H.; Tekman, M.B.; Jahnke, A. The global threat from plastic pollution. Science 2021, 373, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tang, K.H.D.; Li, R.; Li, Z.; Wang, D. Health risk of human exposure to microplastics: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2024, 22, 1155–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Grunfeld, D.A.; Gilbert, D.; Hou, J.; Jones, A.M.; Lee, M.J.; Kibbey, T.C.G.; O’Carroll1, D.M. Underestimated burden of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in global surface waters and groundwaters. Nat. Geosci. 2024, 17, 340–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lyu, X.Y.; Xiao, F.; Shen, C.Y.; Chen, J.J.; Park, C.M.; Sun, Y.Y.; Flury, M.; Wang, D.J. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Subsurface Environments: Occurrence, Fate, Transport, and Research Prospect. Rev. Geophys. 2022, 60, e2021RG000765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, F.; Xiang, L.; Leung, K.; Elsner, M.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Pan, B.; Sun, H.; An, T.; Ying, G.; et al. Emerging contaminants: A One Health perspective. Innovation 2024, 5, 100612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kozlov, M. Landmark study links microplastics to serious health problems. Nature 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Huang, Z.; Yeh, P.J.F.; Jiao, J.J.; Luo, X.; Pan, Y.; Long, Y.; Pan, Y.; Long, Y.N.; Zhang, C.; Zheng, L.Q. A new approach for assessing groundwater recharge by combining GRACE and baseflow with case studies in karst areas of southwest China. Water Resour. Res. 2023, 59, e2022WR032091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. He, Y.Q.; McDonough, L.K.; Zainab, S.M.; Guo, Z.F.; Chen, C.; Xu, Y.Y. Microplastic accumulation in groundwater: Data-scaled insights and future research. Water Res. 2024, 258, 121808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Reichstein, M.; Camps-valls, G.; Stevens, B.; Jung, M.; Denzler, J.; Carvalhais, N.; Prabhat. Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature 2019, 566, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jiang, W.J.; Meng, L.S.; Liu, F.T.; Sheng, Y.Z.; Chen, S.M.; Yang, J.L.; Mao, H.R.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Ning, H. Distribution, source investigation, and risk assessment of topsoil heavy metals in areas with intensive anthropogenic activities using the positive matrix factorization (PMF) model coupled with self-organizing map (SOM). Environ. Geochem. Health 2023, 45, 6353–6370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zang, Y.G.; Hou, X.S.; Li, Z.P.; Li, P.; Sun, Y.; Yu, B.W.; Li, M. Quantify the effects of groundwater level recovery on groundwater nitrate dynamics through a quasi-3D integrated model for the vadose zone-groundwater coupled system. Water Res. 2022, 226, 119213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wei, Y.Q.; Chen, Y.L.; Cao, X.D.; Yeh, T.C.J.; Zhang, J.; Zhan, Z.; Cui, Y.D.; Li, H. Modeling of Microplastics Migration in Soil and Groundwater: Insights into Dispersion and Particle Property Effects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 15224–15235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pang, M.; Du, E.H.; Zheng, C.M. Contaminant Transport Modeling and Source Attribution with Attention-Based Graph Neural Network. Water Resour. Res. 2024, 60, e2023WR035278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mao, H.R.; Wang, G.C.; Liao, F.; Shi, Z.; Rao, Z.; Zhang, H.Y.; Qiao, Z.Y.; Bai, Y.F.; Chen, X.L.; Yan, X.; et al. Spatiotemporal Variation of Groundwater Nitrate Concentration Controlled by Groundwater Flow in a Large Basin: Evidence From Multi-Isotopes (15N, 11B, 18O, and 2H). Water Resour. Res. 2024, 60, e2023WR035299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, W.; Sheng, Y. Soil–Groundwater Environmental Quality and Water Resource: Assessment of Contaminant Sources, Species, and Transformations. Water 2025, 17, 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17101493

AMA Style

Jiang W, Sheng Y. Soil–Groundwater Environmental Quality and Water Resource: Assessment of Contaminant Sources, Species, and Transformations. Water. 2025; 17(10):1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17101493

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Wanjun, and Yizhi Sheng. 2025. "Soil–Groundwater Environmental Quality and Water Resource: Assessment of Contaminant Sources, Species, and Transformations" Water 17, no. 10: 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17101493

APA Style

Jiang, W., & Sheng, Y. (2025). Soil–Groundwater Environmental Quality and Water Resource: Assessment of Contaminant Sources, Species, and Transformations. Water, 17(10), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17101493

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop